Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Associated with Statin Use: A Disproportionality Analysis of the FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System

The role of statins in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: protective or not?

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease of motor neurons characterized by muscle weakness, muscle twitching, and muscle wasting. ALS is regarded as the third-most frequent neurodegenerative disease, subsequent to Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD). The World Health Organization (WHO) in 2007 declared that prolonged use of statins may induce development of ALS-like syndrome and may increase ALS risk. Subsequently, different studies have implicated statins in the pathogenesis of ALS. In contrast, results from preclinical and clinical studies highlighted the protective role of statins against ALS neuropathology. Recently, meta-analyses and systematic reviews illustrated no association between long-term use of statins and ALS risk. These findings highlighted controversial points regarding the effects of statins on ALS pathogenesis and risk. The neuroprotective effects of statins against the development and progression of ALS may be mediated by regulating dyslipidemia and inflammatory changes. However, the mechanism for induction of ALS neuropathology by statins may be related to the dysregulation of liver X receptor signaling (LXR) signaling in the motor neurons and reduction of cholesterol, which has a neuroprotective effect against ALS neuropathology. Nevertheless, the exact role of statins on the pathogenesis of ALS was not fully elucidated. Therefore, this narrative review aims to discuss the role of statins in ALS neuropathology.

Association between genetically proxied lipid-lowering drug targets, lipid traits, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a mendelian randomization study

BACKGROUND

The use of circulating lipid traits as biomarkers to predict the risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is currently controversial, and the evidence-based medical evidence for the use of lipid-lowering agents, especially statins, on ALS risk remains insufficient. Our aim was to apply a Mendelian randomization (MR) approach to assess the causal impact of lipid-lowering agents and circulating lipid traits on ALS risk.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our study included primary and secondary analyses, in which the risk associations of lipid-lowering gene inhibitors, lipid traits, and ALS were assessed by the inverse variance weighting method as the primary approach. The robustness of the results was assessed using LDSC assessment, conventional MR sensitivity analysis, and used Mediating MR to explore potential mechanisms of occurrence. In the secondary analysis, the association of lipid-lowering genes with ALS was validated using the Summary data-based Mendelian Randomization (SMR) method.

RESULTS

Our results showed strong evidence between genetic proxies for Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) inhibitor (OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.68 - 0.86; P = 5.58 × 10-6) and reduced risk of ALS. Additionally, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR) inhibitor (OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 0. 85-1.33) was not found to increase ALS risk. SMR results suggested that ApoB expression was associated with increased ALS risk, and colocalization analysis did not support a significant common genetic variation between ApoB and ALS. Mediator MR analysis suggested a possible mediating role for interleukin-6 and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). While elevated LDL-C was significantly associated with increased risk of ALS among lipid traits, total cholesterol (TC) and ApoB were weakly associated with ALS. LDSC results suggested a potential genetic correlation between these lipid traits and ALS.

CONCLUSIONS

Using ApoB inhibitor can lower the risk of ALS, statins do not trigger ALS, and LDL-C, TC, and ApoB levels can predict the risk of ALS.

Discovery and Exploration of Lipid-Modifying Drug Targets for ALS by Mendelian Randomization

Observational studies have faced challenges in identifying replicable causes for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). To address this, we employed an unbiased and data-driven approach to discover and explore potential causal exposures using two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses. In the phenotype discovery stage, we assessed 3948 environmental exposures from the UK Biobank and utilized ALS summary statistics (Europeans, 20,806 cases, 59,804 controls) as the outcome within a phenome-wide MR pipeline. Through a range of sensitivity analyses, two medication traits were identified to be protective for ALS. In the target exploration stage, we further conducted drug target MR analyses using the latest and trans-ethnic summary data on lipid-related traits and ALS (Europeans, 27,205 cases, 110,881 controls; East Asians, 1234 cases, 2850 controls). Our aim was to explore potential causal drug targets through six lipid-modifying effects. These comprehensive analyses revealed significant findings. Specifically, "cholesterol-lowering medication" and "atorvastatin" survived predefined criteria in the phenotype discovery stage and exhibited a protective effect on ALS. Further in the target exploration stage, we demonstrated that the therapeutic effect of APOB through LDL-lowering was associated with reduced ALS liability in Europeans (OR = 0.835, P = 5.61E - 5). Additionally, the therapeutic effect of APOA1 and LDLR through TC-lowering was associated with reduced ALS liability in East Asians (APOA1, OR = 0.859, P = 5.38E - 4; LDLR, OR = 0.910, P = 2.73E - 5). Overall, we propose potential protective effects of cholesterol-lowering drugs or statins on ALS risk from thousands of exposures. Our research also suggests APOB, APOA1, and LDLR as novel therapeutic targets for ALS and supports their potential protective mechanisms may be mediated by LDL-lowering or TC-lowering effects.

Genetic variation in targets of lipid-lowering drugs and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis risk: a Mendelian randomization study

BACKGROUND

The use of lipid-lowering drugs is still highly controversial in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). We performed a drug-target Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to investigate the effect of targeted lipid-lowering drugs on the risk of ALS.

METHODS

First, we evaluated the causal relationship between HMG-CoA (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A) reductase (HMGCR) inhibitors-taking trait and ALS using a bidirectional two-sample MR study. Second, we investigated the causal relationship between lipid-lowering drugs and ALS through a drug-target MR approach. The summary data for HMGCR inhibitors-taking traits were extracted from a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of medication use and associated disease in the UK Biobank. The summary data for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoprotein B (apoB) were extracted from a meta-analysis of GWAS in individuals of European ancestry in the UKB. The GWAS summary data of ALS were obtained from the Project MinE.

RESULTS

Our bidirectional two-sample MR showed that genetically determined increased HMGCR inhibitors-taking trait was an independent risk factor for ALS (odds ratio [OR] = 1.090, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.035-1.150, p = 0.001). The results of drug-target MR showed that the increased expression of the HMGCR gene in blood with the higher risk of ALS (OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.01-1.46; p = 0.042) through SMR method and the apoB level mediated by the APOB gene increased the risk of ALS (OR = 1.15; 95% CI =1.05-1.25; p = 0.001) through inverse-variance weighted MR method.

CONCLUSION

This present study provides genetic support for a positive causal effect of HMGCR inhibitors-taking trait and ALS. The reason for this may be due to the underlying disease condition behind the medication, rather than the medication itself. Our findings also suggested that HMGCR and apoB inhibitors may have potential protective effects on ALS.

Degradation of neuromuscular junction contributes to muscle weakness but not physical compromise in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients taking lipids-lowering medications

OBJECTIVES

The relevant data about the effects and the associated mechanisms of statins on muscle strength and physical capacity is inconsistent. We investigated the potential contribution of neuromuscular junction (NMJ) degradation to muscle weakness and physical compromise in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) on statins.

METHOD

We recruited male COPD patients (age range = 63-75 years, n = 150) as nonusers (n = 71) and users of statin medications (n = 79) along with age-matched controls (n = 76). The COPD patients were evaluated at baseline and one year later. The data about handgrip strength (HGS), body composition, short physical performance battery (SPPB), and plasma c-terminal agrin fragment-22 (CAF22) as a marker of NMJ disintegration was collected at two time points.

RESULTS

We observed lower HGS, SPPB scores, and higher CAF22 levels in all COPD patients than controls, irrespective of the treatment status (all p < 0.05). Statins further reduced HGS and elevated CAF22 in COPD patients (both p < 0.05). The decline in SPPB was relatively modest in statin users (≈3.7%, p = 0.032) than in nonusers (≈8.7%, p = 0.002). The elevated plasma CAF22 exhibited robust negative correlations with a reduction in HGS but not with SPPB in COPD patients taking statins. We also found a reduction in markers of inflammation and no increase in oxidative stress markers following statin use in COPD patients.

CONCLUSION

Altogether, statin-induced NMJ degradation exacerbates muscle decline but does not contribute to physical compromise in COPD patients.

Mendelian Randomization Analysis Reveals Statins Potentially Increase Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Risk Independent of Peripheral Cholesterol-Lowering Effects

BACKGROUND

Observational studies suggest that statins may affect amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). However, they are limited by confounding and reverse causality biases. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the potential causal associations between statins and ALS using a mendelian randomization (MR) approach.

METHODS

Two-sample MR and drug-target MR were performed. Exposure sources included GWAS summary statistics of statin use, low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), HMGCR-mediated LDL-C and LDL-C response to statins.

RESULTS

Genetic predisposition to statin medication was associated with increased ALS risk (OR = 1.085, 95% CI = 1.025-1.148, p = 0.005). After removing SNPs significantly associated with statin use from the instrumental variables (IVs), LDL-C-related higher ALS risk was absent (before removing: OR = 1.075, 95% CI = 1.013-1.141, p = 0.017; after removing: OR = 1.036, 95% CI = 0.949-1.131, p = 0.432). HMGCR-mediated LDL-C (OR = 1.033, 95% CI = 0.823-1.296, p = 0.779) and blood LDL-C response to statins (OR = 0.998, 95% CI = 0.991-1.005, p = 0.538) had no association with ALS.

CONCLUSIONS

Here, we show that statins may be a risky exposure that increases ALS risk independent of the lowering effect of LDL-C in peripheral circulation. This provides insights into ALS development and prevention.

Historical Review of the Use of Relative Risk Statistics in the Portrayal of the Purported Hazards of High LDL Cholesterol and the Benefits of Lipid-Lowering Therapy

The manner in which clinical trial investigators present their findings to healthcare providers and the public can have a substantial influence on their impact. For example, if a heart attack occurs in 2% of those in the placebo group and in 1% of those in the drug-treated group, the benefit to the treated population is only one percentage point better than no treatment. This finding is unlikely to generate much enthusiasm from the study sponsors and in the reporting of the findings to the public. Instead, trial directors can amplify the magnitude of the appearance of the treatment benefit by using the relative risk (RR) value of a 50% reduction of the risk of a heart attack, since one is 50% of two. By using the RR type of data analysis, clinical trial directors can promote the outcome of their trial in their publication and to the media as highly successful while minimizing or disregarding entirely the absolute risk (AR) reduction of only one percentage point. The practice of expressing the RR without the AR has become routinely deployed in the reporting of findings in many different areas of clinical research. We have provided a historical perspective on how this form of data presentation has become commonplace in the reporting of findings from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on coronary heart disease (CHD) event monitoring and prevention over the past four decades. We assert that the emphasis on RR coupled with insufficient disclosure of AR in the reporting of RCT outcomes has led healthcare providers and the public to overestimate concerns about high cholesterol and to be misled as to the magnitude of the benefits of cholesterol-lowering therapy. The goal of this review is to prompt the scientific community to address this misleading approach to data presentation.

Statin therapy is not warranted for a person with high LDL-cholesterol on a low-carbohydrate diet

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although there is an extensive literature on the efficacy of the low carbohydrate diet (LCD) for weight loss and in the management of type 2 diabetes, concerns have been raised that the LCD may increase cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk by increasing the level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). We have assessed the value of LDL-C as a CVD risk factor, as well as effects of the LCD on other CVD risk factors. We have also reviewed findings that provide guidance as to whether statin therapy would be beneficial for individuals with high LDL-C on an LCD.

RECENT FINDINGS

Multiple longitudinal trials have demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of the LCD, while also providing evidence of improvements in the most reliable CVD risk factors. Recent findings have also confirmed how ineffective LDL-C is in predicting CVD risk.

SUMMARY

Extensive research has demonstrated the efficacy of the LCD to improve the most robust CVD risk factors, such as hyperglycemia, hypertension, and atherogenic dyslipidemia. Our review of the literature indicates that statin therapy for both primary and secondary prevention of CVD is not warranted for individuals on an LCD with elevated LDL-C who have achieved a low triglyceride/HDL ratio.

Statin Medications and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Incidence and Mortality

Studies of statins and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) incidence and survival have had conflicting findings possibly related to difficulties with confounding by indication. We considered potency of statins used and duration of use to explore confounding by indication. Within the Clalit Health Services in Israel, we identified 948 ALS case patients from 2004 through 2017 and matched them with 1,000 control subjects each. Any statin use up to 3 years before ALS onset was not associated with ALS incidence but was associated with a reduced hazard ratio (HR) for death. Odds of ALS did not vary by statin potency, but use of only lower-potency statins was associated with longer survival (HR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.68, 0.98), whereas the association with higher-potency statins was null compared with those case patients who did not use statins. However, duration of statin use appeared to account for these findings. Those who used statins only up to 3 years had longer survival (HR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.61, 0.96) than did case patients who did not use statins, but those who used statins for >3 years did not. Although other explanations are possible, these findings could suggest a protective effect of statins on ALS survival that is partially masked by a worse prognosis from underlying reasons for taking statins that deserves further exploration.

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis as an Adverse Drug Reaction: A Disproportionality Analysis of the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System

INTRODUCTION

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis is a fatal progressive disease with a still unclear multi-factorial etiology. This study focused on the potential relationship between drug exposure and the development of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis by performing a detailed analysis of events reported in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database.

METHODS

The FDA Adverse Event Reporting System quarterly data (January 2004-June 2020) were downloaded and deduplicated. The reporting odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals were calculated as a disproportionality measure. The robustness of the disproportion was assessed accounting for major confounders (i.e., using a broader query, restricting to suspect drugs, and excluding reports with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis as an indication). Disproportionality signals were prioritized based on their consistency across analyses (reporting odds ratio stability).

RESULTS

We retained 1188 amyotrophic lateral sclerosis cases. Sixty-two drugs showed significant disproportionality for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis onset in at least one analysis, and 31 had consistent reporting odds ratio stability, including tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors and statins. Disproportionality signals from ustekinumab, an immunomodulator against interleukins 12-23 used in autoimmune diseases, and the anti-IgE omalizumab were consistent among analyses and unexpected.

CONCLUSIONS

For each drug emerging as possibly associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis onset, biological plausibility, underlying disease, and reverse causality could be argued. Our findings strengthened the plausibility of a precipitating role of drugs primarily through immunomodulation (e.g., tumor necrosis factor-alpha, ustekinumab, and omalizumab), but also by impacting metabolism and the musculoskeletal integrity (e.g., statins and bisphosphonates). Complement and NF-kB dysregulation could represent interesting topics for planning translational mechanistic studies on amyotrophic lateral sclerosis as an adverse drug effect.

Higher blood high density lipoprotein and apolipoprotein A1 levels are associated with reduced risk of developing amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Premorbid body mass index, physical activity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease have been associated with an altered risk of developing amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). There is evidence of shared genetic risk between ALS and lipid metabolism. A very large prospective longitudinal population cohort permits the study of a range of metabolic parameters and the risk of subsequent diagnosis of ALS.

METHODS

The risk of subsequent ALS diagnosis in those enrolled prospectively to the UK Biobank (n=502 409) was examined in relation to baseline levels of blood high and low density lipoprotein (HDL, LDL), total cholesterol, total cholesterol:HDL ratio, apolipoproteins A1 and B (apoA1, apoB), triglycerides, glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and creatinine, plus self-reported exercise and body mass index.

RESULTS

Controlling for age and sex, higher HDL (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.96, p=0.010) and apoA1 (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.94, p=0.005) were associated with a reduced risk of ALS. Higher total cholesterol:HDL was associated with an increased risk of ALS (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.31, p=0.006). In models incorporating multiple metabolic markers, higher LDL or apoB was associated with an increased risk of ALS, in addition to a lower risk with higher HDL or apoA. Coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease and increasing age were also associated with an increased risk of ALS.

CONCLUSIONS

The association of HDL, apoA1 and LDL levels with risk of ALS contributes to an increasing body of evidence that the premorbid metabolic landscape may play a role in pathogenesis. Understanding the molecular basis for these changes will inform presymptomatic biomarker development and therapeutic targeting.

Statin Initiation and Risk of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Danish Population-based Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The evidence of an association between statins and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is heterogeneous and inconclusive.

METHODS

We performed a population-based cohort study consisting of 974,304 statin initiators ≥40 years of age and 1,948,606 matched general population comparators identified from Danish, nationwide registries (1996-2016). We computed incidence rates and hazard ratios (HRs) of a first-time hospital-based diagnosis of ALS. HRs were controlled for sex, birth year, calendar year, medically diagnosed comorbidities, and concomitant medications.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 7.7 years, 852 ALS events occurred among statin initiators (11.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 10.6, 12.1] events per 100,000 person-years) and 1,679 among noninitiators (11.4 [95% CI = 10.9, 12.0] events per 100,000 person years). The overall adjusted HR indicated a slight association between statin initiation and ALS (1.11 [95% CI = 1.00, 1.23]. In the first year after initiation, the HR was 1.40 (95% CI = 1.09, 1.79) for both sexes combined, 1.00 (95% CI = 0.70, 1.42) for men, and 1.92 (95% CI = 1.30, 2.82) for women. The associations diminished to approximately null after the first year of follow-up for both sexes combined and for men, but point estimates were above 1 for women until 10 years after initiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Statin initiation was largely unassociated with ALS diagnosis but was associated with an elevated risk of ALS in women, especially in the first year after initiation. The association could be explained by reverse causation, detection bias, early neurotoxic effects of statins that affect women more than men, or a combination thereof.

TDP-43 mediates SREBF2-regulated gene expression required for oligodendrocyte myelination

Cholesterol metabolism operates autonomously within the central nervous system (CNS), where the majority of cholesterol resides in myelin. We demonstrate that TDP-43, the pathological signature protein for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD), influences cholesterol metabolism in oligodendrocytes. TDP-43 binds directly to mRNA of SREBF2, the master transcription regulator for cholesterol metabolism, and multiple mRNAs encoding proteins responsible for cholesterol biosynthesis and uptake, including HMGCR, HMGCS1, and LDLR. TDP-43 depletion leads to reduced SREBF2 and LDLR expression, and cholesterol levels in vitro and in vivo. TDP-43-mediated changes in cholesterol levels can be restored by reintroducing SREBF2 or LDLR. Additionally, cholesterol supplementation rescues demyelination caused by TDP-43 deletion. Furthermore, oligodendrocytes harboring TDP-43 pathology from FTD patients show reduced HMGCR and HMGCS1, and coaggregation of LDLR and TDP-43. Collectively, our results indicate that TDP-43 plays a role in cholesterol homeostasis in oligodendrocytes, and cholesterol dysmetabolism may be implicated in TDP-43 proteinopathies-related diseases.

Statins and risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a paralytic, heterogeneous and progressive disease characterized by the degeneration of both upper and lower motor neurons. Several studies about the effects of statins drug on the risk of ALS showed contradictory results and evidence for this is inconclusive. So we aimed to perform a meta-analysis on previous studies to clarify the association between statin use and risk of ALS. The databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of science were searched in February 2021 for studies that reported the association between statin use and risk of ALS. The eligible studies had to provide a report on the effect of statin and the incidence of ALS while comparing it to the control group. Articles that had low statin exposure time, the absence of a control group and an unknown number of ALS patients were excluded. The rate ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used for association measures in case-control and cohort studies. After full-text and abstract review, data from 8 studies with a total of 547,622 participants and 13,890 cases of ALS were entered in the present meta-analysis. We combined eight studies using a random-effect model and the RR for statin users among groups was 0.98 (95% CI 0.80-1.20) which indicates no association between statin and incidence of ALS. Also high heterogeneity was detected across the studies (Q value = 26.62, P = .00; I² = 72.71%). In our meta-analysis study, we found no association between statin use and an increase in ALS incidence. This result is in line with some previous studies and provides strong evidence that denies the possible association between statin uptake and disease induction.

Clinical profile of acute pancreatitis following treatment with protease inhibitors: a real-world analysis of post-marketing surveillance data

BACKGROUNDS

Acute pancreatitis (AP) has been reported in patients treated with protease inhibitors (PIs), but there are few real-world studies comparing the occurrence and characteristics of AP after different PI regimens.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Disproportionality analysis and Bayesian analysis were utilized for data mining of the Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database for suspected adverse events involving AP after PI. The times to onset and fatality rates of AP following different PI regimens were also compared.

RESULTS

Based on 33,832 reports related to PIs, 285 cases were associated with AP, involving with 12 out of the 15 studied PIs. Of all the reported AP events related to PIs, 64.56% occurred in men and the median time to onset of AP was 103 (IQR: 26-408) days after the initiation of PI treatment with a fatality rate of 14.02%. Among all PI therapies, indinavir was notably associated with AP, and ritonavir and lopinavir/ritonavir-induced AP cases appeared to be associated with a higher risk of death.

CONCLUSIONS

Most of PIs were associated with AP-related adverse events, among which indinavir has a stronger association with AP but there is no significant difference in fatality rates.

Pathophysiology and Treatment of Non-motor Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis is a progressive and fatal neurodegenerative disease typically presenting with bulbar or limb weakness. There is increasing evidence that amyotrophic lateral sclerosis is a multisystem disease with early and frequent impacts on cognition, behaviour, sleep, pain and fatigue. Dysfunction of normal physiological and metabolic processes also appears common. Evidence from pre-symptomatic studies and large epidemiological cohorts examining risk factors for the future development of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis have reported a high prevalence of changes in behaviour and mental health before the emergence of motor weakness. This suggests that changes beyond the motor system are underway at an early stage with dysfunction across brain networks regulating a variety of cognitive, behavioural and other homeostatic processes. The full impact of non-motor dysfunction continues to be established but there is now sufficient evidence that the presence of non-motor symptoms impacts overall survival in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and with up to 80% reporting non-motor symptoms, there is an urgent need to develop more robust therapeutic approaches. This review provides a contemporary overview of the pathobiology of non-motor dysfunction, offering readers a practical approach with regard to assessment and management. We review the current evidence for pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of non-motor dysfunction in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and highlight the need to further integrate non-motor dysfunction as an important outcome measure for future clinical trial design.

Simvastatin Enhances Muscle Regeneration Through Autophagic Defect-Mediated Inflammation and mTOR Activation in G93ASOD1 Mice

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis is a fatal neurodegenerative disease characterised by the selective loss of motor neurons, muscular atrophy, and degeneration. Statins, as 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, are the most widely prescribed drugs to lower cholesterol levels and used for the treatment of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. However, statins are seldom used in muscular diseases, primarily because of their rare statin-associated myopathy. Recently, statins have been shown to reduce muscular damage and improve its function. Here, we investigated the role of statins in myopathy using G93ASOD1 mice. Our results indicated that simvastatin significantly increased the autophagic flux defect and increased inflammation in the skeletal muscles of G93ASOD1 mice. We also found that increased inflammation correlated with aggravated muscle atrophy and fibrosis. Nevertheless, long-term simvastatin treatment promoted the regeneration of damaged muscle by activating the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway. However, administration of simvastatin did not impede vast muscle degeneration and movement dysfunction resulting from the enhanced progressive impairment of the neuromuscular junction. Together, our findings highlighted that simvastatin exacerbated skeletal muscle atrophy and denervation in spite of promoting myogenesis in damaged muscle, providing new insights into the selective use of statin-induced myopathy in ALS.

Antidiabetics, statins and the risk of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Medications that are used for treatment of metabolic disorders have been suggested to be associated with the development of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

METHODS

To examine the associations of antidiabetics and statins with the subsequent risk of ALS we conducted a population-based nested case-control study of 2475 Swedish residents diagnosed with ALS during July 2006 to December 2013 and 12 375 population controls (five for each ALS case). We extracted information on filled prescriptions of antidiabetics and statins for both cases and controls from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register during the years before ALS diagnosis. Conditional logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) for the associations of these medications with ALS risk.

RESULTS

Patients with ALS were less likely to have been prescribed with antidiabetics compared with controls [OR, 0.76; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.65-0.90]. Conversely, statins were not associated with ALS risk overall (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.98-1.19), although a positive association was noted among women (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.10-1.48). The latter association was mostly explained by ALS cases being more likely to have a first prescription of statins during the year before diagnosis compared with controls (OR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.84-3.49).

CONCLUSIONS

The inverse association of antidiabetics with ALS is consistent with the previously reported inverse association between type 2 diabetes and ALS risk. The increase in prescription of statins during the year before ALS diagnosis deserves attention because it might reflect an acceleration of the course of ALS due to statin use.

The current state of heart disease: statins, cholesterol, fat and sugar

After decades of improvement in the outlook for cardiovascular disease (CVD), we are now seeing a plateau. Statins, once believed to be the most important advance in the fight against heart disease, have not mitigated the incidence or prevalence of CVD.

AIM

New research into lipid-lowering drugs is not only questioning their usefulness in primary care, but identifying them as harmful, resulting in the development of other diseases. When the original research is critically analyzed, the data do not reveal drugs that significantly reduce the incidence or prevalence for primary prevention of CVD in the United States.

METHODS

The current article sheds light on our current beliefs into lipid-lowering to treat potential CVD. Through a discussion of the difference between relative risk reduction and absolute risk reduction, the author suggests lifestyle modifications have been and always will be the best way to fight against this deadly chronic disease.

RESULTS

There is over 60 years-worth of scientific research that has been desperately trying to identify sugar as the culprit and driver of CVD disease; however, the medical system continues to fight against fat and cholesterol. This article makes the reader question what the US government, in association with the Medical Establishment (American Heart Association, American Diabetes Association and the American College of Cardiology) have been eschewing for the last 60-70 years as it has NOT been working.

CONCLUSION

The time for a culture-wide paradigm change has come. The author suggests this will only happen if Big Pharma and Big Food industries will change their marketing habits from 'purely taste' to 'best for your health'.

Associations of Patient Mood, Modulators of Quality of Life, and Pharmaceuticals with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Survival Duration

Associations of modulators of quality of life (QoL) and survival duration are assessed in the fatal motor neuron disease, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Major categories include clinical impression of mood (CIM); physical health; patient social support; and usage of interventions, pharmaceuticals, and supplements. Associations were assessed at p < 0.05 and p < 0.001 significance thresholds using applicable methods (Chi-square, t-test, ANOVA, logistical regression, random forests, Fisher’s exact test) within a retrospective cohort of 1585 patients. Factors significantly correlated with positive (happy or normal) mood included family support and usage of bi-level positive airway pressure (Bi-PAP) and/or cough assist. Decline in physical factors like presence of dysphagia, drooling, general pain, and decrease in ALSFRS-R total score or forced vital capacity (FVC) significantly correlated with negative (depressed or anxious) mood (p < 0.05). Use of antidepressants or pain medications had no association with ALS patient mood (p > 0.05), but were significantly associated with increased survival (p < 0.05). Positive patient mood, Bi-PAP, cough assist, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), and accompaniment to clinic visits associated with increased survival duration (p < 0.001). Of the 47 most prevalent pharmaceutical and supplement categories, 17 associated with significant survival duration increases ranging +4.5 to +16.5 months. Tricyclic antidepressants, non-opioids, muscle relaxants, and vitamin E had the highest associative increases in survival duration (p < 0.05). Random forests, which examined complex interactions, identified the following pharmaceuticals and supplements as most predictive to survival duration: Vitamin A, multivitamin, PEG supplements, alternative herbs, antihistamines, muscle relaxants, stimulant laxatives, and antispastics. Statins, metformin, and thiazide diuretics had insignificant associations with decreased survival.

Is TNF inhibitor exposure a risk factor for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis?

TNFα modulation has been reported to be either beneficial or detrimental in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and therefore appears as a key issue. We analysed the relationship between TNFα inhibitor (TNFi) exposure and ALS. We performed descriptive analysis of ALS reports in patients treated with TNFi, registered in the French Pharmacovigilance Database (FPvD) and disproportionality analyses by the 'case'/'non-case' method in FPvD and worldwide database (Vigibase^® ). The 8 retrieved ALS cases from the FPvD were 5 with limb-onset and 3 with bulbar-onset forms, in patients aged 43-75 years old, mainly treated for inflammatory rheumatism. The time to onset of the first symptoms ranged from 12 to 108 months, and the cumulative TNFi exposure before the diagnosis ranged from 12 to 120 months. TNFi was discontinued and thereafter survival ranged between 12 and 20 months. Disproportionality analyses showed significant associations between TNFi exposure and ALS in the FPvD and Vigibase^® (160 ALS cases), regardless comparators. A putative association between TNFi and ALS must be interpreted cautiously, but TNFi could act as a predisposing or risk factor. TNFi should therefore be avoided in patients with a known risk of ALS and discontinued in the case of neurological signs of ALS.

Formal comment on "Systematic review of the predictors of statin adherence for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease"

Statins have been prescribed for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) for nearly 3 decades. Throughout this period key opinion leaders in the field have been dismayed by the high rate of non-adherence of patients to follow their statin regimen. Hope et al., [1] have addressed this issue by providing a systematic review of research on predictors of statin adherence for primary prevention of CVD. However, their review does not address the ongoing debate as to whether statin treatment is warranted for primary prevention of CVD, nor does it adequately address concerns regarding adverse effects of statins. We have therefore written a commentary which provides a broader perspective on the benefits versus harms of statin therapy. Our perspective of the literature is that non-adherence to statin treatment for primary prevention of CVD is justified because the meager benefits are more than offset by the extensive harms.

Unfolding the pleiotropic facades of rosuvastatin in therapeutic intervention of myriads of neurodegenerative disorders

Rosuvastatin, a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor, and one of the most popular antihyperlipidemic medications have been found to possess pharmacodynamic activities much different from its usual indication. Recent research studies have revealed the efficacy of rosuvastatin in attenuating neuroinflammation, reducing the progression of Alzheimer's disease, providing protection against cerebral ischaemia and spinal cord injury as well as ameliorating epilepsy. Mechanisms behind the neuroprotective potential of rosuvastatin can be attributed to its pleiotropic effects, independent of its ability to inhibit HMG-CoA reductase. These processes include modulation of several cellular pathways, isoprenylation, effects on oxidative stress, nitrosative levels, inflammation, and immune response. This review aims to assimilate and summarize recent findings on the pharmacological actions of rosuvastatin in attenuating neurological disorders in order to guide future research in this space.