Chronic Hepatitis C in Elderly Patients: Current Evidence with Direct-Acting Antivirals

Risk of adverse outcomes following treatment with direct acting antiviral drugs in HCV infected patients with liver cirrhosis

Introduction

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the second major cause of death in Pakistan. Previously, interferon-based regimens were considered highly recommended therapy for HCV patients. Since 2015, interferon-based therapy has been replaced with interferon-free therapy also known as Direct Acting Antiviral (DAA) drugs. The treatment response of interferon-free regimens has been reported as highly effective treatment option with more than 90% sustained virological response (SVR) in chronic HCV infected patients in western countries of the world.

Objective

This study aims to analyze the treatment response of DAA drugs in HCV-infected Pakistani population with liver cirrhosis.

Methodology

We collected the total 94 sample of the HCV infected patients, from June 2020 to September 2020. Forty-six (46) patients were cirrhotic, and forty-eight (48) patients were non-cirrhotic. Data was analyzed using IBM SPSS version 21 software.

Conclusion

The findings of our study suggest that the response rate was 82.60% in HCV cirrhotic patients and 68.75% in HCV non-cirrhotic patients. Our study showed that overall treatment response was independent of age and gender. We also observed some adverse effects such as hepatocellular carcinoma, portosystemic encephalopathy (PSE), spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), hepatorenal syndrome (HRS), upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB), ascites, among patients following treatment with interferon-free regimens.

Virus Infections in Older People

Older people are more prone to viral infections, and often have worse outcomes. This was well demonstrated during the COVID-19 pandemic, where a disproportionate number of deaths occurred in the oldest and frailest people. The assessment of the older person with a viral infection is complicated by the high prevalence of multiple comorbidities and sensory or cognitive impairment. They often present with common geriatric syndromes such as falls or delirium, rather than the more typical features of a viral illness in younger people. Comprehensive geriatric assessment by a specialist multidisciplinary team is the gold standard of management, as viral illness is unlikely to present in isolation of other healthcare needs. We discuss the presentation, diagnosis, prevention, and management of common viral infections-respiratory syncytial virus, coronavirus, norovirus, influenza, hepatitis, herpes, and dengue viruses-with special consideration of infections in the older patient.

Efficacy and safety of glecaprevir and pibrentasvir in Japanese patients with hepatitis C virus infection aged 75 years or older

Background

It is estimated that approximately 50% of patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in Japan are currently over 75 years old. However, patients aged ≥ 75 years are typically underrepresented in clinical trials of direct-acting antivirals. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of glecaprevir and pibrentasvir (G/P) treatment in Japanese patients with HCV infection aged ≥ 75 years.

Methods

This multicenter, retrospective study included 271 Japanese patients with HCV infection from 12 centers in Miyazaki Prefecture, Japan. Demographic, clinical, virological, and adverse events (AEs) data obtained during and after G/P treatment were collected from medical records. The patients were divided into two groups: younger (n = 199, aged < 75 years) and older (n = 72, aged ≥ 75 years). Virological data and AEs were analyzed according to the age group.

Results

In intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol analyses, the overall sustained virological response 12 (SVR12) rates were 93% and 98.8%, respectively. Two patients in the older group and 14 patients in the younger group dropped out before SVR12 assessment. Although patients in the older group tended to have liver cirrhosis, 95.8% in the older group and 92% in the younger group achieved SVR12 in the ITT analysis (P = 0.404). In total, 48 (17.7%) patients experienced treatment-related AEs. Common AEs during treatment included pruritus, headache, and fatigue. The AEs were not significantly different between the two groups.

Conclusions

Compared with younger patients, older patients showed similar virological response and tolerance to G/P treatment.

Safety and efficacy of directly-acting antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis C virus in elderly people

INTRODUCTION

In Italy, the prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is higher in the elderly, although the efficacy and safety of treatment in this population has not been extensively studied. Moreover, little is known about how much pharmacological interaction affects eligibility to treatment and to what extent the treatment affects subsequent outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of directly acting antivirals (DAAs), drug-to-drug interactions, and post-treatment outcomes in 138 patients with HCV aged 70 years or older, who were consecutively treated in our center between 2015 and 2020.

RESULTS

The mean age was 77 years old (range = 70-95 years old). The Cumulative Illness Rating Scale of pretherapy severity was classified as moderate to severe in 65% of patients. Fifty-five patients (40%) presented compensated cirrhosis, eight of which were complicated by hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and all were cured before treatment. One hundred two patients (74%) were taking two or more drugs (range = 0-5 concomitant drugs registered) and in 29 patients (21%) we found potential drug-to-drug interaction. In 11 of those 29 patients (38%), we were forced to change the chronic therapy, when all therapeutic regimens were equal in terms of efficacy and interactions, to avoid potentially serious drug interactions. One serious adverse event occurred in our sample population (i.e., diverticular bleeding due to interaction with direct oral anticoagulants [DOACs]), whereas mild side effects occurred in 37% of patients. The undetectability of HCV RNA at the end of treatment was achieved in 97% of patients, whereas a sustained virological response (SVR) 12 and SVR 24 were obtained in 98% of patients. When comparing pretherapy with post-therapy data, after a medium follow-up of 15 months (median = 1 year, minimum = 2 months, and maximum = 4 years), we observed a reduction in the incidence of episodes of liver decompensation in patients with cirrhosis and a slight increase in the incidence of HCC (with 6 recurrent and 5 de novo HCC), diagnosed within 13 months from the end of therapy. In all patients, we found a significant improvement in all ultrasound variables and a significant reduction in the elastographic measurements. No significant differences in outcomes were observed dividing the population into patients aged ≥ 80 and < 80 years old.

CONCLUSIONS

Directly acting antiviral therapy was found to be safe and effective in elderly people, and, despite the large number of concomitant drugs, pharmacological interactions appeared to not affect the adherence to therapy or the incidence of adverse events. Side effects were mostly independent from the type of DAA used and from the burden of comorbidity. In long-term follow-up, the benefit of DAA therapy mainly concerned liver pathology and should be strongly advised in patients with cirrhosis. The therapy was found to not affect extrahepatic comorbidities but allowed to end follow-up in noncirrhotic patients with savings in terms of resources. Finally, patients should not be excluded based on age if they have a good performance status.

Outcomes in the Era of Interferon-Free Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy After Liver Transplantation in Patients with Hepatitis C Virus and Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background/Aims

Several studies have shown improved outcome of liver transplant (LT) recipients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) since the widespread clinical use of interferon-free direct-acting antivirals (IFN-free DAAs). However, the association of IFN-free DAA therapy on tumor characteristics and on the outcome of LT in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has not been studied. We aimed to examine pre-transplant HCC characteristics and post-LT outcomes in the IFN-based DAA treatment and IFN-free DAA treatment eras.

Methods

Using the United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database, we analyzed adults with a diagnosis of HCV and HCC who received LTs from deceased donors from 04/2012 to 12/2017. Cox regression models were used to identify the association between the IFN-based DAA treatment vs IFN-free DAA treatment era and study outcomes (mortality, graft failure, and HCC recurrence at 1 and 3 years).

Results

Complete tumor necrosis was significantly higher in the IFN-free DAA treatment era (22.73% vs 18.22%; P <0.01). No other HCC tumor characteristics differed significantly between the two eras. HCC recurrence rates were similar between the two eras. On multivariate Cox regression analysis, patients who had transplants in the IFN-free DAA treatment era had lower risk of graft failure compared with the IFN-based DAA treatment group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25–0.77; P <0.01). Patient mortality was lower in the IFN-free DAA treatment era although the difference was not statistically significant (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.60–1.13; P =0.22).

Conclusion

LT recipients in the IFN-free DAA treatment era had significantly higher complete tumor necrosis in explants. Other HCC tumor characteristics were similar between the two eras. Post-LT graft failure at 1 and 3 years significantly decreased in the IFN-free DAA treatment era among patients with HCV and HCC, although patient mortality was not statistically different.

Cost-effectiveness of a "treat-all" strategy using Direct-Acting Antivirals (DAAs) for Japanese patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 at different fibrosis stages

Aim

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of therapeutic strategies initiated at different stages of liver fibrosis using three direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), sofosbuvir-ledipasvir (SL), glecaprevir-pibrentasvir (GP), and elbasvir plus grazoprevir (E/G), for Japanese patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) genotype 1.

Methods

We created an analytical decision model reflecting the progression of liver fibrosis stages to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of alternative therapeutic strategies applied at different fibrosis stages. We compared six treatment strategies: treating all patients regardless of fibrosis stage (TA), treating individual patients with one of four treatments starting at four respective stages of liver fibrosis progression (F1S: withholding treatment at stage F0 and starting treatment from stage F1 or higher, and three successive options, F2S, F3S, and F4S), and administering no antiviral treatment (NoRx). We adopted a lifetime horizon and Japanese health insurance payers’ perspective.

Results

The base case analysis showed that the incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gain of TA by SL, GP, and E/G compared with the strategies of starting treatments for patients with the advanced fibrosis stage, F2S, varied from 0.32 to 0.33, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were US$24,320, US$18,160 and US$17,410 per QALY, respectively. On the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve, TA was most likely to be cost-effective, with the three DAAs at the willingness to pay thresholds of US$50,000.

Conclusions

Our results suggested that administration of DAA treatment for all Japanese patients with genotype 1 CHC regardless of their liver fibrosis stage would be cost-effective under ordinary conditions.

Hepatitis C direct-acting antiviral outcomes in patients 75 years and older

Background and Aim

Elderly patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection have worse interferon‐based treatment outcomes than young patients. Direct‐acting antiviral (DAA) regimens have enabled the treatment of previously difficult‐to‐cure populations. There are few studies that specifically assess DAA treatment outcomes in patients over 75 years of age.

Methods

Design: This was a cohort study. Setting: The setting was three Canadian HCV specialty sites. Participants: Patients aged 75 years and older and treated with DAA without interferon were enrolled. Measurements: Patient demographics, liver fibrosis by transient elastography, treatment regimen, and treatment outcome data were collected.

Results

The mean age of 78 patients in our analysis was 78.6 years (SD 3.5; range: 75–88 years). The most common genotype was 1b (35%). The most frequently utilized regimens included sofosbuvir‐velpatasvir (33%) and ledipasvir‐sofosbuvir (32%). Ribavirin was included for 17% of recipients. Sustained virological response (SVR) was achieved in 94% of patients (69% of those receiving ribavirin and 98% of patients on ribavirin‐free regimens). Ribavirin toxicity contributed to the lower SVR rates in ribavirin‐exposed patients. Ribavirin dosage was decreased in three patients and ultimately discontinued in two of these patients. All treatment was discontinued in another two patients.

Conclusion

Ribavirin‐free DAA therapy is safe and achieves SVR rates in older adults comparable to those described in the general population. RBV inclusion frequently results in complications, often leads to treatment modification or interruption, and does not improve SVR rates in those with advanced age.

Anticholinergic Burden and Safety Outcomes in Older Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C: A Retrospective Cohort Study

AIM

Older patients with chronic hepatitis C infection starting direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are frequently prescribed multiple medications that may be categorized as inappropriate. Anticholinergic burden has been shown to be a predictor of adverse health and functional outcomes. Different scales are available to calculate anticholinergic burden. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of anticholinergic medication among older patients treated with DAAs and the risk factors associated using the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden (ACB) scale, the Anticholinergic Risk Scale (ARS) and the Anticholinergic Drug Scale (ADS) and analyze the resulting safety consequences.

METHODS

Observational, retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients ≥65 years old receiving DAAs and taking concomitant medication. This study was conducted in accordance with the Strengthening the Reporting of observational studies in Epidemiology Statement.

RESULTS

236 patients were included. The average age was 71.7 years, 73.3% cirrhotic, and 47% patients took ≥5 medicines. According to the ACB, ARS and ADS scales, 35.2% (n = 83), 10.6% (n = 25) and 34.3% (n = 81) of the patients were treated with anticholinergic medication. Two hundred-and-six (86%) patients presented any adverse events (AEs) during therapy. ARS scale showed a significant relationship between presence of anticholinergic medication and AEs. A large number of patients suffered anticholinergic events, with more events per patient in patients taking anticholinergic drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

Older hepatitis C chronic patients are exposed to potentially inappropriate polypharmacy and anticholinergic risk, according to the ACB, ARS and ADS scales. The three scales showed different results. Only the ARS scale was associated with AEs, but the rate of anticholinergic effects per patient was significantly higher in patients with anticholinergic drugs, regardless of the scale used. Consider quality of pharmacotherapy when starting DAA with a multidisciplinary approach could improve health outcomes.

Efficacy and safety of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in patients with hepatitis C virus infection aged ≥75 years

AIM

Opportunities to treat older patients with hepatitis C virus infection have increased. We investigated the efficacy and safety of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in patients with HCV infection aged ≥75 years.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 131 patients with hepatitis C virus infection treated with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir at nine institutions in Japan. The patients were divided into two groups according to their age: the elderly group (n = 43, aged ≥75 years) and younger group (n = 88, aged <75 years). We compared the clinical characteristics, virologic response and adverse events between the two groups. The predictive factors for adverse events were also assessed.

RESULTS

The presence of cirrhosis (27.9%), a history of hepatocellular carcinoma (23.3%) and comorbidities (88.4%) were more frequently observed in the elderly group than in the younger group. Six (14.0%) patients in the elderly group and 19 (21.6%) in the younger group dropped out before the sustained virologic response 12 assessment. In the intention-to-treat population, 86.0% in the elderly group and 78.4% in the younger group achieved sustained virologic response 12 (P = 0.30). In the modified intention-to-treat population, all patients achieved sustained virologic response 12. A total of 27.5% of patients experienced adverse events. The most frequently observed adverse events was pruritus, and was significantly associated with female sex, the presence of hemodialysis and serum albumin at baseline <4.0 g/dL.

CONCLUSION

Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir therapy was effective and well tolerated, even in elderly patients with hepatitis C virus infection aged ≥75 years. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2020; ••: ••-••.

Efficacy and safety of direct-acting antivirals in older patients with cirrhosis and high comorbidity index

OBJECTIVE

There is scarce data with regard to the effectiveness and safety of direct-acting antivirals and possible drug-drug interactions between antiviral therapy and the multiple drugs frequently assumed by older patients. The aim is to evaluate the impact of comorbidities and drug-drug interactions on the efficacy and tolerability of direct-acting antivirals in this population.

METHODS

Observational retrospective study of patients at least 65 years old receiving all-oral antiviral therapy between April 2015 and March 2016.

RESULTS

Two hundred sixty-one patients were identified. Age distribution: 65-74 (73.9%), 75-79 (18.4%) and ≥80 (7.7%) years. Average age was 71 years, 38.7% were male, and 90% of patients took concomitant medication (43% patients taking ≥ 5 medicines). Predicted clinically significant drug-drug interactions were present in 72.8% of patients. The sustained viral response 12 weeks after end of treatment was 96.9%. Patients with serious adverse events received more concomitant drugs and all of them presented a clinical risk group ≥06/5.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct antiviral agents are highly effective also in older patients with advanced liver disease, comorbidities and concomitant medications. Serious adverse events increased with the number of concomitant medications and the severity of comorbidity. A clinical risk group score ≥06/5 may help to decide the indication of antiviral therapy in this difficult-to-treat population.

Efficacy and safety of direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C in the elderly: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND&AIMS

Since the introduction of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) several studies have reported high efficacy and safety in Hepatitis C infected patients, even in those earlier considered difficult-to-treat. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of DAA therapy in elderly patients.

METHODS

The PubMed MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched through July 2018. Two independent researchers extracted data and assessed the quality and risk of bias. Risk ratios (RRs) were pooled using random effects models. The primary outcome was efficacy of DAA therapy assessed by the RR for non-sustained virologic response (SVR) among patients aged <65 vs ≥65 years.

RESULTS

Overall, we identified 63 studies including 34 082 patients treated with different DAAs. Risk for non-SVR was comparable in patients <65 and ≥65 years of age (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.86-1.15; P = 0.979) and even lower in a subgroup analysis of cirrhotic patients ≥65 years of age (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.35-0.99, P = 0.044). Risk for non-SVR was similar between age groups in all other subgroup analyses. Elderly patients had a significantly increased risk of adverse events (AEs) (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.11-1.52, P = 0.001), but not for serious adverse events (P = 0.43) or treatment discontinuation (P = 0.15). Risk for anaemia if treated with additional ribavirin was 2.84 (95% CI 1.73-4.66, P < 0.001) in elderly patients compared to patients <65 years.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that DAAs are highly effective and safe in elderly patients. Ribavirin should be avoided in the elderly as more AEs and particularly anaemia is observed. Further cost-effectiveness analyses are needed to evaluate the socio-economic benefit of treating elderly people without advanced liver disease.

Extracellular Water to Total Body Water Ratio in Viral Liver Diseases: A Study Using Bioimpedance Analysis

Aims: To investigate the relationship between extracellular water to total body water ratio (ECW/TBW) in bioimpedance analysis (BIA) and clinical parameters in hepatitis viruses related to liver diseases. Methods: ECW/TBW was compared in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV, n = 85) and hepatitis C virus (HCV, n = 440) related liver diseases. We also examined factors linked to mild to severe overhydrated state (ECW/TBW ≥0.4). Results: The median ECW/TBW in the HCV group was 0.388 (range, 0.365–0.433), while that in the HBV group was 0.381 (range, 0.363–0.425) (p < 0.0001). In all cases (n = 525), for predicting F3 or more, ECW/TBW yielded the area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC, 0.74912) and for predicting F4, ECW/TBW yielded the AUROC (0.75517). Multivariate analysis showed that age, prothrombin time, serum albumin, and alanine aminotransferase were significant factors linked to ECW/TBW ≥0.4. In patients with FIB-4 index <2, ECW/TBW in the HCV group was significantly higher than that in the HBV group (p = 0.0188), while in patients with 2 ≤ FIB-4 index <4 and FIB-4 index ≥4, the difference in the two groups did not reach significance. Conclusion: ECW/TBW can be different according to hepatitis viruses. Overhydrated status can easily occur in the HCV group even in the non-LC status compared with the HBV group.