1
|
The Singapore National Precision Medicine Strategy. Nat Genet 2023; 55:178-186. [PMID: 36658435 DOI: 10.1038/s41588-022-01274-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Precision medicine promises to transform healthcare for groups and individuals through early disease detection, refining diagnoses and tailoring treatments. Analysis of large-scale genomic-phenotypic databases is a critical enabler of precision medicine. Although Asia is home to 60% of the world's population, many Asian ancestries are under-represented in existing databases, leading to missed opportunities for new discoveries, particularly for diseases most relevant for these populations. The Singapore National Precision Medicine initiative is a whole-of-government 10-year initiative aiming to generate precision medicine data of up to one million individuals, integrating genomic, lifestyle, health, social and environmental data. Beyond technologies, routine adoption of precision medicine in clinical practice requires social, ethical, legal and regulatory barriers to be addressed. Identifying driver use cases in which precision medicine results in standardized changes to clinical workflows or improvements in population health, coupled with health economic analysis to demonstrate value-based healthcare, is a vital prerequisite for responsible health system adoption.
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
Introducing precision medicine strategies into routine practice will require robust economic evidence. Decision-makers need to understand the value of a precision medicine strategy compared with alternative ways to treat patients. This chapter describes health economic analysis techniques that are needed to generate this evidence. The value of any precision medicine strategy can be demonstrated early to inform evidence generation and improve the likelihood of translation into routine practice. Advances in health economic analysis techniques are also explained and their relevance to precision medicine is highlighted. Ensuring that constraints on delivery are resolved to increase uptake and implementation will improve the value of a new precision medicine strategy. Empirical methods to quantify stakeholders' preferences can be effective to inform the design of a precision medicine intervention or service delivery model. A range of techniques to generate relevant economic evidence are now available to support the development and translation of precision medicine into routine practice. This economic evidence is essential to inform resource allocation decisions and will enable patients to benefit from cost-effective precision medicine strategies in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Payne
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| | - Sean P Gavan
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pataky RE, Bryan S, Sadatsafavi M, Peacock S, Regier DA. Tools for the Economic Evaluation of Precision Medicine: A Scoping Review of Frameworks for Valuing Heterogeneity-Informed Decisions. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2022; 40:931-941. [PMID: 35895254 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-022-01176-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/26/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Precision medicine highlights the importance of exploring heterogeneity in the effectiveness and costs of interventions. Our objective was to identify and compare frameworks for valuing heterogeneity-informed decisions, and consider their strengths and weaknesses for application to precision medicine. METHODS We conducted a scoping review to identify papers that proposed an analytical framework to place a value, in terms of costs and health benefits, on using heterogeneity to inform treatment selection. The search included English-language papers indexed in MEDLINE, Embase or EconLit, and a manual review of references and citations. We compared the frameworks qualitatively considering: the purpose and setting of the analysis; the types of precision medicine interventions where the framework could be applied; and the framework's ability to address the methodological challenges of evaluating precision medicine. RESULTS Four analytical frameworks were identified: value of stratification, value of heterogeneity, expected value of individualised care and loss with respect to efficient diffusion. Each framework is suited to slightly different settings and research questions. All focus on maximising net benefit, and quantify the opportunity cost of ignoring heterogeneity by comparing individualised or stratified decisions to a means-based population-wide decision. Where the frameworks differ is in their approaches to uncertainty, and in the additional metrics they consider. CONCLUSIONS Identifying and utilising heterogeneity is at the core of precision medicine, and the ability to quantify the value of heterogeneity-informed decisions is critical. Using an analytical framework to value heterogeneity will help provide evidence to inform investment in precision medicine interventions, appropriately capturing the value of targeted health interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reka E Pataky
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer Research Centre, 675 W. 10th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, Canada.
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| | - Stirling Bryan
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Mohsen Sadatsafavi
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Stuart Peacock
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer Research Centre, 675 W. 10th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, Canada
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada
| | - Dean A Regier
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer Research Centre, 675 W. 10th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, Canada
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vellekoop H, Versteegh M, Huygens S, Corro Ramos I, Szilberhorn L, Zelei T, Nagy B, Tsiachristas A, Koleva-Kolarova R, Wordsworth S, Rutten-van Mölken M. The Net Benefit of Personalized Medicine: A Systematic Literature Review and Regression Analysis. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2022; 25:1428-1438. [PMID: 35248467 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2021] [Revised: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 01/09/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Amidst conflicting expectations about the benefits of personalized medicine (PM) and the potentially high implementation costs, we reviewed the available evidence on the cost-effectiveness of PM relative to non-PM. METHODS We conducted a systematic literature review of economic evaluations of PM and extracted data, including incremental quality-adjusted life-years (ΔQALYs) and incremental costs (Δcosts). ΔQALYs and Δcosts were combined with estimates of national cost-effectiveness thresholds to calculate incremental net monetary benefit (ΔNMB). Regression analyses were performed with these variables as dependent variables and PM intervention characteristics as independent variables. Random intercepts were used to cluster studies according to country. RESULTS Of 4774 studies reviewed, 128 were selected, providing cost-effectiveness data for 279 PM interventions. Most studies were set in the United States (48%) and the United Kingdom (16%) and adopted a healthcare perspective (82%). Cancer treatments (60%) and pharmaceutical interventions (72%) occurred frequently. Prognostic tests (19%) and tests to identify (non)responders (37%) were least and most common, respectively. Industry sponsorship occurred in 32%. Median ΔQALYs, Δcosts, and ΔNMB per individual were 0.03, Int$575, and Int$18, respectively. We found large heterogeneity in cost-effectiveness. Regression analysis showed that gene therapies were associated with higher ΔQALYs than other interventions. PM interventions for neoplasms brought higher ΔNMB than PM interventions for other conditions. Nonetheless, average ΔNMB in the 'neoplasm' group was found to be negative. CONCLUSIONS PM brings improvements in health but often at a high cost, resulting in 0 to negative ΔNMB on average. Pricing policies may be needed to reduce the costs of interventions with negative ΔNMB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heleen Vellekoop
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Matthijs Versteegh
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Simone Huygens
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Isaac Corro Ramos
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Tamás Zelei
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Balázs Nagy
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
| | | | | | - Sarah Wordsworth
- Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Maureen Rutten-van Mölken
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Challenges of conducting value assessment for Comprehensive Genomic Profiling. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2022; 38:e57. [PMID: 35674123 DOI: 10.1017/s026646232200040x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
6
|
Mostbauer H, Nishkumay O, Rokyta O, Vavryniuk V. Warfarin resistance: possibilities to solve this problem. A case report. J Int Med Res 2022; 50:3000605221103959. [PMID: 35748017 PMCID: PMC9235305 DOI: 10.1177/03000605221103959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Effective prevention of thromboembolism is essential for patients with mechanical
prosthetic heart valves. For this group of patients, vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) remain
the drug group of choice despite the widespread use of new anticoagulants in other
diseases. As a consequence, warfarin resistance remains a serious challenge for
physicians. The current report describes a 65-year-old male patient that had a mechanical
prosthetic aortic valve implanted due to severe aortic insufficiency after infective
endocarditis. Despite consistent increases in his warfarin dose, the level of
international normalized ratio (INR) remained very low. The patient was considered to have
warfarin resistance. Warfarin was successfully replaced by another VKA, acenocoumarol,
which resulted in a stable INR observed over 1 year of follow-up. Achieving the target INR
in patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves using VKAs is the main goal of
thromboprophylaxis. Although the genetic changes that cause warfarin resistance are
understood, the options to overcome these pharmacogenetic issues remain limited. Based on
the success with this current patient, physicians with similar patients with warfarin
resistance might wish to consider replacing warfarin with acenocoumarol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Halyna Mostbauer
- Department of Internal Medicine Number 2, Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv, Ukraine
| | - Olga Nishkumay
- Department of Internal Medicine Number 2, Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv, Ukraine
| | - Oksana Rokyta
- Department of Internal Medicine Number 2, Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv, Ukraine
| | - Valeriia Vavryniuk
- Department of Internal Medicine Number 2, Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv, Ukraine
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cruz Navarro J, Ponce Mejia LL, Robertson C. A Precision Medicine Agenda in Traumatic Brain Injury. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:713100. [PMID: 35370671 PMCID: PMC8966615 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.713100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury remains a leading cause of death and disability across the globe. Substantial uncertainty in outcome prediction continues to be the rule notwithstanding the existing prediction models. Additionally, despite very promising preclinical data, randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of neuroprotective strategies in moderate and severe TBI have failed to demonstrate significant treatment effects. Better predictive models are needed, as the existing validated ones are more useful in prognosticating poor outcome and do not include biomarkers, genomics, proteonomics, metabolomics, etc. Invasive neuromonitoring long believed to be a "game changer" in the care of TBI patients have shown mixed results, and the level of evidence to support its widespread use remains insufficient. This is due in part to the extremely heterogenous nature of the disease regarding its etiology, pathology and severity. Currently, the diagnosis of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the acute setting is centered on neurological examination and neuroimaging tools such as CT scanning and MRI, and its treatment has been largely confronted using a "one-size-fits-all" approach, that has left us with many unanswered questions. Precision medicine is an innovative approach for TBI treatment that considers individual variability in genes, environment, and lifestyle and has expanded across the medical fields. In this article, we briefly explore the field of precision medicine in TBI including biomarkers for therapeutic decision-making, multimodal neuromonitoring, and genomics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jovany Cruz Navarro
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Lucido L Ponce Mejia
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Neurology, LSU Health Science Center, New Orleans, LA, United States
| | - Claudia Robertson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Vellekoop H, Huygens S, Versteegh M, Szilberhorn L, Zelei T, Nagy B, Koleva-Kolarova R, Tsiachristas A, Wordsworth S, Rutten-van Mölken M. Guidance for the Harmonisation and Improvement of Economic Evaluations of Personalised Medicine. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2021; 39:771-788. [PMID: 33860928 PMCID: PMC8200346 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-021-01010-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to develop guidance contributing to improved consistency and quality in economic evaluations of personalised medicine (PM), given current ambiguity about how to measure the value of PM as well as considerable variation in the methodology and reporting in economic evaluations of PM. METHODS A targeted literature review of methodological papers was performed for an overview of modelling challenges in PM. Expert interviews were held to discuss best modelling practice. A systematic literature review of economic evaluations of PM was conducted to gain insight into current modelling practice. The findings were synthesised and used to develop a set of draft recommendations. The draft recommendations were discussed at a stakeholder workshop and subsequently finalised. RESULTS Twenty-two methodological papers were identified. Some argued that the challenges in modelling PM can be addressed within existing methodological frameworks, others disagreed. Eighteen experts were interviewed. They believed large uncertainty to be a key concern. Out of 195 economic evaluations of PM identified, 56% addressed none of the identified modelling challenges. A set of 23 recommendations was developed. Eight recommendations focus on the modelling of test-treatment pathways. The use of non-randomised controlled trial data is discouraged but several recommendations are provided in case randomised controlled trial data are unavailable. The parameterisation of structural uncertainty is recommended. Other recommendations consider perspective and discounting; premature survival data; additional value elements; patient and clinician compliance; and managed entry agreements. CONCLUSIONS This study provides a comprehensive list of recommendations to modellers of PM and to evaluators and reviewers of PM models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heleen Vellekoop
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Simone Huygens
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Matthijs Versteegh
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Tamás Zelei
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Balázs Nagy
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
| | | | | | - Sarah Wordsworth
- Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Maureen Rutten-van Mölken
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Recognizing the ethical implications of stem cell research: A call for broadening the scope. Stem Cell Reports 2021; 16:1656-1661. [PMID: 34214488 PMCID: PMC8282461 DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2021.05.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Revised: 05/29/2021] [Accepted: 05/31/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The ethical implications of stem cell research are often described in terms of risks, side effects, safety, and therapeutic value, which are examples of so-called hard impacts. Hard impacts are typically measurable and quantifiable. To understand the broader spectrum of ethical implications of stem cell research on science and society, it is equally important to recognize soft impacts. Soft impacts are the effects on behavior, experiences, actions, moral values, and social structures; these are often indirect effects of stem cell research. The combined notions of hard and soft impacts offer a broader way of thinking about the social and ethical implications of stem cell research and can help to steer stem cell research into a sociable desirable direction. Soft impacts enable researchers to become more aware of the broad range of significant implications involved in their work and deserve equal attention for understanding such ethical and societal effects of stem cell research.
Collapse
|
10
|
Mohammadi T, Sadatsafavi M, Carlsten C. The economics of precision health: preventing air pollution-induced exacerbation in asthma. ERJ Open Res 2021; 7:00790-2020. [PMID: 33778052 PMCID: PMC7983226 DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00790-2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 01/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The demonstrable value of precision medicine, in the context of common environmental exposures, has scarcely been explored. This study evaluated the cost effectiveness of a preventive personalised intervention to reduce the adverse effect of air pollution in the context of asthma. A decision–analytic model was used to conduct a cost-utility analysis of prevention interventions in case of acute exposure to air pollution in mild asthma. Three different strategies, as follows, were compared: no preventive intervention; precision health strategy based on information from genotype testing, followed with treating high-risk patients; and prescribing additional medication to all mild asthmatics as a preventive intervention. The costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) in the base case and alternative scenarios were obtained through probabilistic analysis. The results showed that the precision prevention intervention (anticipatory intervention for asthmatics, guided by relevant genetic abnormality, in the face of acute air pollution) is a cost-effective strategy compared with no such intervention, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of CAD 49 555 per QALY. Furthermore, this strategy is a dominant strategy compared with an intervention that prescribes medication indiscriminately to all asthmatics. The incorporation of genomic testing to stratify risk of asthmatics to pollution-driven exacerbations, and then tailoring a preventive intervention accordingly, may be cost effective relative to untailored methods. These results lend plausibility to the use of precision medicine for limiting asthma exacerbation in the context of air pollution and, potentially, other exposures. Glutathione-S-transferase genotyping to determine the use of preventive asthma medication in the face of air pollution is cost effective in this model. Precision prevention in the setting of common environmental exposures may be used in other contexts.https://bit.ly/35Lab4b
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tima Mohammadi
- Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Mohsen Sadatsafavi
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Chris Carlsten
- Air Pollution Exposure Laboratory, Division of Respiratory Medicine, Dept of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kasztura M, Richard A, Bempong NE, Loncar D, Flahault A. Cost-effectiveness of precision medicine: a scoping review. Int J Public Health 2019; 64:1261-1271. [PMID: 31650223 PMCID: PMC6867980 DOI: 10.1007/s00038-019-01298-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2019] [Revised: 08/19/2019] [Accepted: 09/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Precision medicine (PM) aims to improve patient outcomes by stratifying or individualizing diagnosis and treatment decisions. Previous reviews found inconclusive evidence as to the cost-effectiveness of PM. The purpose of this scoping review was to describe current research findings on the cost-effectiveness of PM and to identify characteristics of cost-effective interventions.
Methods We searched PubMed with a combination of terms related to PM and economic evaluations and included studies published between 2014 and 2017.
Results A total of 83 articles were included, of which two-thirds were published in Europe and the USA. The majority of studies concluded that the PM intervention was at least cost-effective compared to usual care. However, the willingness-to-pay thresholds varied widely. Key factors influencing cost-effectiveness included the prevalence of the genetic condition in the target population, costs of genetic testing and companion treatment and the probability of complications or mortality. Conclusions This review may help inform decisions about reimbursement, research and development of PM interventions. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00038-019-01298-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Kasztura
- Department of Health Professions, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Aude Richard
- Institute of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Nefti-Eboni Bempong
- Institute of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Dejan Loncar
- Institute of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Antoine Flahault
- Institute of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Antoñanzas F, Juárez-Castelló CA, Rodríguez-Ibeas R. Pre-approval incentives to promote adoption of personalized medicine: a theoretical approach. HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW 2019; 9:28. [PMID: 31664604 PMCID: PMC6820936 DOI: 10.1186/s13561-019-0244-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2018] [Accepted: 10/06/2019] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Currently, personalised medicine is becoming more frequently used and many drug companies are including this strategy to gain market access for very specialized therapies. In this article, in order to understand the relationships between the health authority and the drug company when deciding upon the implementation of personalized medicines, we take a theoretical perspective to model it when the price and reimbursement policy follows a pay-for-performance scheme. During the development of a new drug, the firm must decide whether to generate additional knowledge by investing in additional resources to stratify the target population based on a biomarker or directly apply for marketing authorization for the new treatment without information on the characteristics of patients who could respond to it. In this context, we assume that the pricing policy is set by the health authority, and then we characterize the pricing and investment decisions contingent on the rate of response to the treatment. RESULTS We find that the price when the firm carries out R&D leading to the personalized treatments is not necessarily higher than the price if the firm does not carry out the R&D investment. When the rate of response to the treatment is too low, then the new drug is not marketed. If the rate of response is too high, personalized medicine is not implemented. For intermediate values of the rate of response, the adoption of personalized medicine may occur if the investment costs are sufficiently low; otherwise, the treatment is given to all patients without additional information on their characteristics. The higher the quality of the genetic test (in terms of its sensitivity and specificity), the wider the interval for the values of the proportional responders for which personalized medicine may be implemented. CONCLUSIONS Our findings show that pre-approval incentives (prices) to promote the personalized treatments depend on the specific characteristics of the disease and the efficacy of the treatment. The model gives an intuitive idea about what to expect in terms of price incentives when the possibility of personalizing treatments becomes a strategic decision for the stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F. Antoñanzas
- Department of Economics, University of La Rioja, 26004 Logroño, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Miscio G, Paroni G, Bisceglia P, Gravina C, Urbano M, Lozupone M, Piccininni C, Prisciandaro M, Ciavarella G, Daniele A, Bellomo A, Panza F, Di Mauro L, Greco A, Seripa D. Pharmacogenetics in the clinical analysis laboratory: clinical practice, research, and drug development pipeline. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2019; 15:751-765. [PMID: 31512953 DOI: 10.1080/17425255.2019.1658742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Over the last decade, the spread of next-generation sequencing technology along with the rising cost in health management in national health systems has led to widespread use/abuse of pharmacogenetic tests (PGx) in the practice of many clinical disciplines. However, given their clinical significance, it is important to standardize these tests for having an interaction with the clinical analysis laboratory (CAL), in which a PGx service can meet these requirements. Areas covered: A diagnostic test must meet the criteria of reproducibility and validity for its utility in the clinical routine. This present review mainly describes the utility of introducing PGx tests in the CAL routine to produce correct results useful for setting up personalized drug treatments. Expert opinion: With a PGx service, CALs can provide the right tool to help clinicians to make better choices about different categories of drugs and their dosage and to manage the economic impact both in hospital-based settings and in National Health Services, throughout electronic health records. Advances in PGx also allow a new approach for pharmaceutical companies in order to improve drug development and clinical trials. As a result, CALs can achieve a powerful source of epidemiological, clinical, and research findings from PGx tests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Miscio
- Clinical Laboratory Analysis and Transfusional Medicine, Laboratory and Transfusional Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza , Foggia , Italy
| | - Giulia Paroni
- Research Laboratory, Complex Structure of Geriatrics, Department of Medical Sciences, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza , Foggia , Italy
| | - Paola Bisceglia
- Research Laboratory, Complex Structure of Geriatrics, Department of Medical Sciences, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza , Foggia , Italy
| | - Carolina Gravina
- Research Laboratory, Complex Structure of Geriatrics, Department of Medical Sciences, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza , Foggia , Italy
| | - Maria Urbano
- Research Laboratory, Complex Structure of Geriatrics, Department of Medical Sciences, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza , Foggia , Italy
| | - Madia Lozupone
- Neurodegenerative Disease Unit, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience, and Sense Organs, University of Bari Aldo Moro , Bari , Italy
| | - Carla Piccininni
- Psychiatric Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia , Foggia , Italy
| | - Michele Prisciandaro
- Clinical Laboratory Analysis and Transfusional Medicine, Laboratory and Transfusional Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza , Foggia , Italy
| | - Grazia Ciavarella
- Clinical Laboratory Analysis and Transfusional Medicine, Laboratory and Transfusional Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza , Foggia , Italy
| | - Antonio Daniele
- Institute of Neurology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart , Rome , Italy.,Institute of Neurology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS , Rome , Italy
| | - Antonello Bellomo
- Psychiatric Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia , Foggia , Italy
| | - Francesco Panza
- Research Laboratory, Complex Structure of Geriatrics, Department of Medical Sciences, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza , Foggia , Italy.,Neurodegenerative Disease Unit, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience, and Sense Organs, University of Bari Aldo Moro , Bari , Italy
| | - Lazzaro Di Mauro
- Clinical Laboratory Analysis and Transfusional Medicine, Laboratory and Transfusional Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza , Foggia , Italy
| | - Antonio Greco
- Research Laboratory, Complex Structure of Geriatrics, Department of Medical Sciences, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza , Foggia , Italy
| | - Davide Seripa
- Research Laboratory, Complex Structure of Geriatrics, Department of Medical Sciences, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza , Foggia , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Decision Support for Re-Designed Medicinal Products - Assessing Consequences of a Customizable Product Design on the Value Chain from a Sustainability Perspective. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019. [DOI: 10.1017/dsi.2019.91] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
AbstractDespite advances in pharmacological research providing means for individually customized patient attribute treatments, the 'one-size-fits-all' paradigm remains. Customization is associated with cost increases and the value assessment of customized medicinal products shows upon a narrow economic focus. Inspired by value models, emerging in manufacturing industry research, this study suggests a novel methodology encompassing a full sustainability perspective, including the social, economic and ecological dimension, for design decision support for medicinal products. A concept screening matrix is adapted, using sustainability criteria as value indicators. The focus is to create value for the whole pharmaceutical value chain whilst keeping the core purpose of medicinal products, i.e. to bring societal benefits. An illustrative case study presents an application of the methodology on a commercial product for curing hypertension. The traditional product design for hypertension treatment is compared to a customized product design. Results indicate that a customized product design is preferable if value is to be created from a social or/and an ecological sustainability perspective.
Collapse
|
15
|
Malogajski J, Branković I, Land JA, Thomas PPM, Morré SA, Ambrosino E. The Potential Role for Host Genetic Profiling in Screening for Chlamydia-Associated Tubal Factor Infertility (TFI)-New Perspectives. Genes (Basel) 2019; 10:genes10060410. [PMID: 31142036 PMCID: PMC6627277 DOI: 10.3390/genes10060410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2019] [Revised: 05/23/2019] [Accepted: 05/24/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Host immunogenetic factors can affect late complications of urogenital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis. These findings are creating new avenues for updating existing risk prediction models for C. trachomatis-associated tubal factor infertility (TFI). Research into host factors and its utilization may therefore have future implications for diagnosing C. trachomatis-induced infertility. We outline the epidemiological situation regarding C. trachomatis and TFI in high-income countries. Thereupon, we review the main characteristics of the population undergoing fertility work-up and identify screening and diagnostic strategies for TFI currently in place. The Netherlands is an exemplary model for the state of the art in high-income countries. Within the framework of existing clinical approaches, we propose a scenario for the translation of relevant genome-based information into triage of infertile women, with the objective of implementing genetic profiling in the routine investigation of TFI. Furthermore, we describe the state of the art in relevant gene- and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) based clinical prediction models and place our perspectives in the context of these applications. We conclude that the introduction of a genetic test of proven validity into the assessment of TFI should help reduce patient burden from invasive and costly examinations by achieving a more precise risk stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jelena Malogajski
- Institute of Public Health Genomics, Department of Genetics and Cell Biology, Research Institute GROW, Faculty of Health, Medicine & Life Sciences, University of Maastricht, 6211 LK Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- Department of Public Health, School of Health Professions, Long Island University-Brooklyn, Brooklyn, New York, NY 11201, USA.
| | - Ivan Branković
- Institute of Public Health Genomics, Department of Genetics and Cell Biology, Research Institute GROW, Faculty of Health, Medicine & Life Sciences, University of Maastricht, 6211 LK Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- Department of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Infection Biology, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Jolande A Land
- Institute of Public Health Genomics, Department of Genetics and Cell Biology, Research Institute GROW, Faculty of Health, Medicine & Life Sciences, University of Maastricht, 6211 LK Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Pierre P M Thomas
- Institute of Public Health Genomics, Department of Genetics and Cell Biology, Research Institute GROW, Faculty of Health, Medicine & Life Sciences, University of Maastricht, 6211 LK Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- Laboratory of Immunogenetics, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, VU University Medical Center, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Servaas A Morré
- Institute of Public Health Genomics, Department of Genetics and Cell Biology, Research Institute GROW, Faculty of Health, Medicine & Life Sciences, University of Maastricht, 6211 LK Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- Laboratory of Immunogenetics, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, VU University Medical Center, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Elena Ambrosino
- Institute of Public Health Genomics, Department of Genetics and Cell Biology, Research Institute GROW, Faculty of Health, Medicine & Life Sciences, University of Maastricht, 6211 LK Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Faruque F, Noh H, Hussain A, Neuberger E, Onukwugha E. Economic Value of Pharmacogenetic Testing for Cancer Drugs with Clinically Relevant Drug-Gene Associations: A Systematic Literature Review. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 2019; 25:260-271. [PMID: 30698084 PMCID: PMC7397474 DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.2.260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pharmacogenetic testing can provide predictive insights about the efficacy and safety of drugs used in cancer treatment. Although many drug-gene associations have been reported in the literature, the strength of evidence supporting each association can vary significantly. Even among the subgroup of drugs classified by the PharmGKB database to have a high or moderate level of evidence, there is limited information regarding the economic value of pharmacogenetic testing. OBJECTIVES To: (a) summarize the available pharmacoeconomic evidence assessing the value of pharmacogenetic testing for cancer drugs with clinically relevant drug-gene associations; (b) determine the quality of the studies that contain this evidence; and (c) discuss the quality of this evidence with respect to the level of evidence of the drug-gene associations. METHODS The PharmGKB database was used to identify cancer drugs with clinically relevant drug-gene associations graded high (1A, 1B) or moderate (2A, 2B). A systematic literature review was conducted using these drugs. Ovid MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched to identify cost-effectiveness, cost-utility, or cost-minimization studies comparing pharmacogenetic testing to an alternative. Cost and effect values from every relevant comparison within the studies were extracted, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was either extracted or calculated for each comparison. Quality assessment was conducted for each study using the Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) instrument. Qualitative synthesis was used to summarize the data. RESULTS The search yielded 2,191 citations, of which 35 studies met the inclusion criteria. Pharmacoeconomic studies were available for the following drugs from the PharmGKB database: fluoropyrimidine, 6-mercaptopurine, irinotecan, carboplatin, cisplatin, erlotinib, gefitinib, cetuximab, panitumumab, and trastuzumab. The studies were conducted in Asia, Europe, Canada, the United States, and Mexico and reported cost-utility, cost-effectiveness, and cost-minimization outcomes. The mean QHES score was 80 (SD = 22) for the studies of drug-gene pairs with high (1A, 1B) and moderate (2A, 2B) levels of evidence (1A = 82, 1B = 93, 2A = 71, and 2B = 74). There was variation across studies in terms of reporting. 109 relevant comparisons were identified within the studies. Of those that reported cost per life-year or cost per quality-adjusted life-year (n = 58 comparisons), pharmacogenetic testing was dominant in 21% overall and 42%, 21%, 17%, and 5% of the comparisons in Asia, Europe, Canada, and the United States, respectively. Variability was observed in the ICER values regardless of geographic region or drug. Pharmacogenetic testing was cost saving in 17 of 19 cost-minimization comparisons and was favored most frequently when compared with genetically indiscriminate strategies containing the drug of interest. CONCLUSIONS There was mixed evidence regarding the value of pharmacogenetic testing to guide cancer treatment. For future pharmacogenomic-related economic studies, we recommend prioritizing clinically relevant drug-gene associations and greater adherence to available best practice guidelines for conducting and reporting economic evaluation studies. DISCLOSURES No outside funding supported this review. Part of Hussain's research time was supported by a Merit Review Award (I01 BX000545), Medical Research Service, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Hussain also reports personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, and France Foundation, outside the submitted work. Onukwugha reports grants from Pfizer and Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, along with advisory board fees from Novo Nordisk, outside the submitted work. Faruque, Neuberger, and Noh have nothing to disclose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fahim Faruque
- University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore
| | - Heejung Noh
- University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore
| | - Arif Hussain
- Baltimore VA Medical Center and University of Maryland Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore
| | | | - Eberechukwu Onukwugha
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
Precision medicine is making an impact on patients, health care delivery systems, and research participants in ways that were only imagined fifteen years ago when the human genome was first sequenced. Discovery of disease-causing and drug-response genetic variants has accelerated, while adoption into clinical medicine has lagged. We define precision medicine and the stakeholder community required to enable its integration into research and health care. We explore the intersection of data science, analytics, and precision medicine in the formation of health systems that carry out research in the context of clinical care and that optimize the tools and information used to deliver improved patient outcomes. We provide examples of real-world impact and conclude with a policy and economic agenda necessary for the adoption of this new paradigm of health care both in the United States and globally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geoffrey S Ginsburg
- Geoffrey S. Ginsburg ( ) is director of the Duke Center for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine, Duke University, in Durham, North Carolina
| | - Kathryn A Phillips
- Kathryn A. Phillips is a professor of health economics and health services research at the University of California San Francisco
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Santos M, Stefani S, Neto JPR, Santos MC. New Challenges in Oncology for the Brazilian Private Health Sector: Specialists' Concerns After the ISPOR International Congress in Boston, Massachusetts, 2017. Value Health Reg Issues 2019; 20:12-18. [PMID: 30634086 DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2018.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2018] [Revised: 08/16/2018] [Accepted: 10/09/2018] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
The congress of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research is one of the main worldwide forums for the dissemination of research and knowledge on healthcare economics. Brazil is the largest country in Latin America, with a per-capita gross domestic product of $15 200 in 2017 and healthcare expenditure of the order of $1 318 per inhabitant. Brazilian specialists participated actively in the society's latest congress, which took place in Boston, Massachusetts, from May 20 to 24, 2017. They met to discuss the main topics dealt with at the congress and their applicability to Brazilian realities. The topics chosen were precision medicine, new challenges for economic modeling within oncology and immuno-oncology, data to aid in managerial decision making (ie, data from real-world studies), and, lastly, strategies for accessing high-cost medications in Brazil. This opinion article sought to report the main conclusions and consensus reached by this group of specialists on the occasion of this discussion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcos Santos
- Faculty of Health and Sciences, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
| | - Stephen Stefani
- Mae de Deus Cancer Institute, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
Conditions of scarcity impact healthcare services for cancer patients. This is the unpleasant reality for nations, local governments, hospitals, and even individual doctors. This means that medical services judged by objective standards as potentially effective by medical professionals are limited because of financial or access scarcity. With this situation of scarcity as premise, one must raise the ethical question of how to deal with scarcity while respecting fundamental principles of human dignity and human rights. This chapter focuses on the German healthcare context where dignity and rights form the basis and framework for medical ethics. Accordingly, in Germany, rationing medical services for life-threatening diseases has been traditionally and appropriately criticized and prohibited. Granting a situation of scarcity, however, some prioritization becomes increasingly necessary. Thus, there is present need for careful ethical analysis of non-emergency regulatory prioritization principles and protocols. Above all, analysis and conclusions must preserve and foster society's deepest moral commitments.
Collapse
|
20
|
Weymann D, Pataky R, Regier DA. Economic Evaluations of Next-Generation Precision Oncology: A Critical Review. JCO Precis Oncol 2018; 2:1-23. [DOI: 10.1200/po.17.00311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Precision oncology has the potential to improve patient health and reduce treatment costs. Yet the up-front cost of genomic testing with next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies can be prohibitive. Our study is a structured review of economic evaluations of precision oncology informed by NGS. The aim is to characterize the availability and scope of economic evidence. Materials and Methods We searched Medline (PubMed), Embase (Ovid), and Web of Science databases for English-language full-text peer-reviewed articles published between 2000 and 2016. We focused our search on articles that estimated the benefit of precision oncology in relation to its costs. We excluded studies that did not undertake full economic evaluations or did not focus on NGS technologies. We reviewed all included studies and summarized key methodological and empirical study characteristics. Results Fifty-five economic evaluations met our inclusion criteria. The number of published studies increased steadily, from three studies between 2005 and 2007 to 26 between 2014 and 2016. Most studies evaluated multiplex panels (86%). We found testing was frequently used to predict prognosis (67%), to diagnose patients (24%), or to identify targeted therapeutic options (7%). Methods and cost effectiveness differed according to NGS technology, test strategy, and cancer type. Deterministic and probabilistic analyses were typically used to characterize parameter and decision uncertainty (91% and 75%). Conclusion Although the availability of economic evidence examining precision oncology increased over time, methods used often did not align with current guidelines. Future evaluations should undertake extensive sensitivity analysis to address all sources of uncertainty associated with rapidly changing NGS technologies. Furthermore, additional research is needed evaluating the cost effectiveness of more comprehensive next-generation technologies before implementing these on a wider scale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deirdre Weymann
- All authors, Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, BC Cancer; and Dean A. Regier, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Reka Pataky
- All authors, Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, BC Cancer; and Dean A. Regier, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Dean A. Regier
- All authors, Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, BC Cancer; and Dean A. Regier, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Christensen KD, Vassy JL, Phillips KA, Blout CL, Azzariti DR, Lu CY, Robinson JO, Lee K, Douglas MP, Yeh JM, Machini K, Stout NK, Rehm HL, McGuire AL, Green RC, Dukhovny D. Short-term costs of integrating whole-genome sequencing into primary care and cardiology settings: a pilot randomized trial. Genet Med 2018; 20:1544-1553. [PMID: 29565423 PMCID: PMC6151171 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2018.35] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2017] [Accepted: 01/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Great uncertainty exists about the costs associated with whole genome sequencing (WGS). Methods One hundred cardiology patients with cardiomyopathy diagnoses, and 100 ostensibly healthy primary care patients were randomized to receive a family history report alone or with a WGS report. Cardiology patients also reviewed prior genetic test results. WGS costs were estimated by tracking resource use and staff time. Downstream costs were estimated by identifying services in administrative data, medical records, and patient surveys for 6 months. Results The incremental cost per patient of WGS testing was $5,098 in cardiology settings and $5,073 in primary care settings compared to family history alone. Mean six month downstream costs did not differ statistically between the control and WGS arms in either setting (cardiology: difference = −$1,560, 95%CI −$7,558 to $3,866, p=0.36; primary care: difference = $681, 95%CI −$884 to $2,171, p=0.70). Scenario analyses showed the cost reduction of omitting or limiting the types of secondary findings was less than $69 and $182 per patient in cardiology and primary care, respectively. Conclusion Short-term costs of WGS were driven by the costs of sequencing and interpretation rather than downstream healthcare. Disclosing additional types of secondary findings has a limited cost impact following disclosure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kurt D Christensen
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. .,Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| | - Jason L Vassy
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Section of General Internal Medicine, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kathryn A Phillips
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Center for Translational and Policy Research on Personalized Medicine (TRANSPERS), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.,Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy and Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Carrie L Blout
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Danielle R Azzariti
- Partners HealthCare Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Christine Y Lu
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jill O Robinson
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kaitlyn Lee
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Michael P Douglas
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Center for Translational and Policy Research on Personalized Medicine (TRANSPERS), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jennifer M Yeh
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Division of General Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kalotina Machini
- Partners HealthCare Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Natasha K Stout
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Heidi L Rehm
- Partners HealthCare Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Amy L McGuire
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Robert C Green
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.,Partners HealthCare Personalized Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Dmitry Dukhovny
- Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wright S, Daker-White G, Newman W, Payne K. Understanding barriers to the introduction of precision medicines in non-small cell lung cancer: A qualitative interview protocol. Wellcome Open Res 2018; 3:24. [PMID: 29780892 PMCID: PMC5934686 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.13976.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: While precision medicines targeting genetic mutations and alterations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been available since 2010, their adoption into clinical practice has been slow. Evidence suggests that a number of barriers, such as insufficient clinician knowledge, a need for training of test providers, or a lack of specific clinical guidelines, may slow the implementation of precision in general. However, little attention has been given to the barriers to providing precision medicines in NSCLC. The purpose of this protocol is to outline the design for a qualitative interview study to identify the barriers and facilitators to the provision of precision medicines for NSCLC. Methods: This study will use semi-structured interviews with clinicians (n=10), test providers (n=10), and service commissioners (n=10) to identify the perceived barriers and facilitators to providing historical, current, and future precision medicines in NSCLC. Participants will be identified through mailing list advertisements and snowball sampling. Recruitment will continue until data saturation, indicated by no new themes arising from the data. Interviews will be conducted by telephone to facilitate geographical diversity. The qualitative data will be analysed using a framework analysis with themes anticipated to relate to; relevant barriers to providing precision medicines, the impact of different barriers on medicine provision, changes in the ability to provide precision medicines over time, and strategies to facilitate the provision of precision medicines. Ethics: This study has been approved by the University of Manchester Proportionate Review Research Ethics Committee (Reference number: 2017-1885-3619). Written consent will be obtained from all participants. Conclusion: This study is the first to explore the barriers and facilitators to providing precision medicines for NSCLC in the English NHS. The findings will inform strategies to improve the implementation of future precision medicines. These findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications and national and international conferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart Wright
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Gavin Daker-White
- Centre for Primary Care, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - William Newman
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Katherine Payne
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Are whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing approaches cost-effective? A systematic review of the literature. Genet Med 2018; 20:1122-1130. [PMID: 29446766 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2017.247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 313] [Impact Index Per Article: 52.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2017] [Accepted: 11/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We conducted a systematic literature review to summarize the current health economic evidence for whole-exome sequencing (WES) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS). METHODS Relevant studies were identified in the EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EconLit and University of York Centre for Reviews and Dissemination databases from January 2005 to July 2016. Publications were included in the review if they were economic evaluations, cost studies, or outcome studies. RESULTS Thirty-six studies met our inclusion criteria. These publications investigated the use of WES and WGS in a variety of genetic conditions in clinical practice, the most common being neurological or neurodevelopmental disorders. Study sample size varied from a single child to 2,000 patients. Cost estimates for a single test ranged from $555 to $5,169 for WES and from $1,906 to $24,810 for WGS. Few cost analyses presented data transparently and many publications did not state which components were included in cost estimates. CONCLUSION The current health economic evidence base to support the more widespread use of WES and WGS in clinical practice is very limited. Studies that carefully evaluate the costs, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of these tests are urgently needed to support their translation into clinical practice.
Collapse
|
24
|
Gavan SP, Thompson AJ, Payne K. The economic case for precision medicine. EXPERT REVIEW OF PRECISION MEDICINE AND DRUG DEVELOPMENT 2018; 3:1-9. [PMID: 29682615 PMCID: PMC5890303 DOI: 10.1080/23808993.2018.1421858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2017] [Accepted: 12/22/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: The advancement of precision medicine into routine clinical practice has been highlighted as an agenda for national and international health care policy. A principle barrier to this advancement is in meeting requirements of the payer or reimbursement agency for health care. This special report aims to explain the economic case for precision medicine, by accounting for the explicit objectives defined by decision-makers responsible for the allocation of limited health care resources. Areas covered: The framework of cost-effectiveness analysis, a method of economic evaluation, is used to describe how precision medicine can, in theory, exploit identifiable patient-level heterogeneity to improve population health outcomes and the relative cost-effectiveness of health care. Four case studies are used to illustrate potential challenges when demonstrating the economic case for a precision medicine in practice. Expert commentary: The economic case for a precision medicine should be considered at an early stage during its research and development phase. Clinical and economic evidence can be generated iteratively and should be in alignment with the objectives and requirements of decision-makers. Programmes of further research, to demonstrate the economic case of a precision medicine, can be prioritized by the extent that they reduce the uncertainty expressed by decision-makers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean P. Gavan
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Alexander J. Thompson
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Katherine Payne
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Arnold M. Simulation modeling for stratified breast cancer screening - a systematic review of cost and quality of life assumptions. BMC Health Serv Res 2017; 17:802. [PMID: 29197417 PMCID: PMC5712150 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2766-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2017] [Accepted: 11/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The economic evaluation of stratified breast cancer screening gains momentum, but produces also very diverse results. Systematic reviews so far focused on modeling techniques and epidemiologic assumptions. However, cost and utility parameters received only little attention. This systematic review assesses simulation models for stratified breast cancer screening based on their cost and utility parameters in each phase of breast cancer screening and care. METHODS A literature review was conducted to compare economic evaluations with simulation models of personalized breast cancer screening. Study quality was assessed using reporting guidelines. Cost and utility inputs were extracted, standardized and structured using a care delivery framework. Studies were then clustered according to their study aim and parameters were compared within the clusters. RESULTS Eighteen studies were identified within three study clusters. Reporting quality was very diverse in all three clusters. Only two studies in cluster 1, four studies in cluster 2 and one study in cluster 3 scored high in the quality appraisal. In addition to the quality appraisal, this review assessed if the simulation models were consistent in integrating all relevant phases of care, if utility parameters were consistent and methodological sound and if cost were compatible and consistent in the actual parameters used for screening, diagnostic work up and treatment. Of 18 studies, only three studies did not show signs of potential bias. CONCLUSION This systematic review shows that a closer look into the cost and utility parameter can help to identify potential bias. Future simulation models should focus on integrating all relevant phases of care, using methodologically sound utility parameters and avoiding inconsistent cost parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Arnold
- Munich Center of Health Sciences, LMU, Munich, Germany. .,Institute of Health Economics and Health Care Management, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany. .,Institut für Gesundheitsökonomie und Management im Gesundheitswesen, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Ludwigstr. 28 RG, 5. OG, 80539, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Terkola R, Antoñanzas F, Postma M. Economic evaluation of personalized medicine: a call for real-world data. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2017; 18:1065-1067. [PMID: 28382502 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-017-0890-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Terkola
- University of Florida-College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, USA
- Unit of PharmacoTherapy, -Epidemiology and -Economics (PTEE), Department of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Maarten Postma
- Unit of PharmacoTherapy, -Epidemiology and -Economics (PTEE), Department of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Institute of Science in Healthy Aging and Healthcare (SHARE), University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Nagler M, Angelillo-Scherrer A, Méan M, Limacher A, Abbal C, Righini M, Beer JH, Osterwalder J, Frauchiger B, Aschwanden M, Matter CM, Kucher N, Cornuz J, Banyai M, Husmann M, Staub D, Mazzolai L, Hugli O, Rodondi N, Aujesky D. Long-term outcomes of elderly patients with CYP2C9 and VKORC1 variants treated with vitamin K antagonists. J Thromb Haemost 2017; 15:2165-2175. [PMID: 28834238 DOI: 10.1111/jth.13810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2017] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
Essentials The long-term effects of VKORC1 and CYP2C9 variants on clinical outcomes remains unclear. We followed 774 patients ≥65 years with venous thromboembolism for a median duration of 30 months. Patients with CYP2C9 variants are at increased risk of death and non-major bleeding. Patients with genetic variants have a slightly lower anticoagulation quality only. SUMMARY Background The long-term effect of polymorphisms of the vitamin K-epoxide reductase (VKORC1) and the cytochrome P450 enzyme gene (CYP2C9) on clinical outcomes remains unclear. Objectives We examined the association between CYP2C9/VKORC1 variants and long-term clinical outcomes in a prospective cohort study of elderly patients treated with vitamin K antagonists for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Methods We followed 774 consecutive patients aged ≥ 65 years with acute VTE from nine Swiss hospitals for a median duration of 30 months. The median duration of initial anticoagulant treatment was 9.4 months. The primary outcome was the time to any clinical event (i.e. the composite endpoint of overall mortality, major and non-major bleeding, and recurrent VTE. Results Overall, 604 (78%) patients had a CYP2C9 or VKORC1 variant. Three hundred and thirty-four patients (43.2%) had any clinical event, 119 (15.4%) died, 100 (12.9%) had major and 167 (21.6%) non-major bleeding, and 100 had (12.9%) recurrent VTE. After adjustment, CYP2C9 (but not VKORC1) variants were associated with any clinical event (hazard ratio [HR], 1.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-1.66), death (HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.19-2.52) and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (sub-hazard ratio [SHR], 1.39; 95% CI, 1.02-1.89), but not with major bleeding (SHR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.69-1.55) or recurrent VTE (SHR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.62-1.44). Patients with genetic variants had a slightly lower anticoagulation quality. Conclusions CYP2C9 was associated with long-term overall mortality and non-major bleeding. Although genetic variants were associated with a slightly lower anticoagulation quality, there was no relationship between genetic variants and major bleeding or VTE recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Nagler
- Department of Haematology and Central Haematology Laboratory, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - A Angelillo-Scherrer
- Department of Haematology and Central Haematology Laboratory, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - M Méan
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - A Limacher
- CTU Bern, and Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - C Abbal
- Division of Hematology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - M Righini
- Division of Angiology and Hemostasis, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - J H Beer
- Cantonal Hospital of Baden, Baden, Switzerland
| | - J Osterwalder
- Emergency Department, Cantonal Hospital of St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland
| | - B Frauchiger
- Department of Internal Medicine, Cantonal Hospital of Frauenfeld, Frauenfeld, Switzerland
| | - M Aschwanden
- Division of Angiology, Basel University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - C M Matter
- Center for Molecular Cardiology, University of Zurich and University Heart Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - N Kucher
- Division of Angiology, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - J Cornuz
- Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - M Banyai
- Division of Angiology, Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - M Husmann
- Division of Angiology, Zurich University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - D Staub
- Division of Angiology, Basel University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - L Mazzolai
- Service of Angiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - O Hugli
- Emergency Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - N Rodondi
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Institute of Primary Health Care, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - D Aujesky
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Hörster L, Schlenk RF, Stadler M, Gabriel M, Thol F, Schildmann J, Vollmann J, Rochau U, Sroczynski G, Wasem J, Ganser A, Port M, Neumann A. Cost-effectiveness of methods in personalized medicine. Results of a decision-analytic model in patients with acute myeloid leukemia with normal karyotype. Leuk Res 2017; 62:84-90. [PMID: 28988037 DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2017.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2017] [Revised: 09/14/2017] [Accepted: 09/17/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND During the last years, molecular genetic data are increasingly used as prognostic and predictive factors in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The molecular genetic profile permits a rapid risk categorization and beyond that a prediction of differential treatment efficacy of post-remission chemotherapy versus an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in specific subgroups. METHODS The aim of this study was to evaluate cost-effectiveness of two different strategies of risk categorization (conventional cytogenetic diagnostics (CCD) versus molecular genetic diagnostics (MGD)) in patients with AML, using a decision-analytic state-transition model. The model is run as (Monte Carlo) microsimulation in which individuals pass through in cycles with a cycle length of one month and a time horizon of ten years. FINDINGS Results show that on average, individuals within the MGD group generated about US$ 32,000 higher costs but survived about seven months longer than individuals within the CCD group. This leads to an Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) of about US$ 4928 per survived month. INTERPRETATION With a GDP (Gross Domestic Product) of US$ 26,467 (€ 33,630) per capita in Germany in 2012, the base-case ICER of US$ 4928 per survived month projected to US$ 59,136 per survived year is in between the simple GDP and the three times GDP per capita.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Hörster
- Institute for Health Care Management and Research, University of Duisburg-Essen, Thea-Leymann-Str. 9, 45127 Essen, Germany.
| | - Richard F Schlenk
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Michael Stadler
- Department of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology, and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Maria Gabriel
- Department of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology, and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Felicitas Thol
- Department of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology, and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Jan Schildmann
- Dept. of Ethics and Philosophy, Wilhelm Löhe Hochschule, Merkurstraße 41/Südstadtpark 90763 Fürth, Germany; Dept. of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig Maximilians University, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377 München, Germany
| | - Jochen Vollmann
- Institute for Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Malakowturm, Markstraße 258a, 44799 Bochum, Germany
| | - Ursula Rochau
- Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Eduard-Wallnöfer-Zentrum 1, 6060 Hall i.T., Austria; Area 4 Health Technology Assessment and Bioinformatics, ONCOTYROL - Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Karl-Kapferer-Straße 5, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Gaby Sroczynski
- Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Eduard-Wallnöfer-Zentrum 1, 6060 Hall i.T., Austria
| | - Jürgen Wasem
- Institute for Health Care Management and Research, University of Duisburg-Essen, Thea-Leymann-Str. 9, 45127 Essen, Germany
| | - Arnold Ganser
- Department of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology, and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Matthias Port
- Department of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology, and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany; Bundeswehr Institute of Radiobiology affiliated to the University of Ulm, Ernst von Bergmann Kaserne, Neuherbergstr. 11, 80937 Munich, Germany
| | - Anja Neumann
- Institute for Health Care Management and Research, University of Duisburg-Essen, Thea-Leymann-Str. 9, 45127 Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Verbelen M, Weale ME, Lewis CM. Cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenetic-guided treatment: are we there yet? THE PHARMACOGENOMICS JOURNAL 2017; 17:395-402. [PMID: 28607506 PMCID: PMC5637230 DOI: 10.1038/tpj.2017.21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 144] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2016] [Revised: 02/15/2017] [Accepted: 04/14/2017] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Pharmacogenetics (PGx) has the potential to personalize pharmaceutical treatments. Many relevant gene-drug associations have been discovered, but PGx-guided treatment needs to be cost-effective as well as clinically beneficial to be incorporated into standard health-care. We reviewed economic evaluations for PGx associations listed in the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Table of Pharmacogenomic Biomarkers in Drug Labeling. We determined the proportion of evaluations that found PGx-guided treatment to be cost-effective or dominant over the alternative strategies, and estimated the impact on this proportion of removing the cost of genetic testing. Of the 137 PGx associations in the FDA table, 44 economic evaluations, relating to 10 drugs, were identified. Of these evaluations, 57% drew conclusions in favour of PGx testing, of which 30% were cost-effective and 27% were dominant (cost-saving). If genetic information was freely available, 75% of economic evaluations would support PGx-guided treatment, of which 25% would be cost-effective and 50% would be dominant. Thus, PGx-guided treatment can be a cost-effective and even a cost-saving strategy. Having genetic information readily available in the clinical health record is a realistic future prospect, and would make more genetic tests economically worthwhile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Verbelen
- MRC Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - M E Weale
- Division of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - C M Lewis
- MRC Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.,Division of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Malogajski J, Jansen ME, Ouburg S, Ambrosino E, Terwee CB, Morré SA. The attitudes of Dutch fertility specialists towards the addition of genetic testing in screening of tubal factor infertility. SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTHCARE 2017; 12:123-127. [PMID: 28477924 DOI: 10.1016/j.srhc.2017.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2016] [Revised: 01/31/2017] [Accepted: 04/03/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aims to identify elements perceived by Dutch fertility specialists as barriers and facilitators for the introduction of genetic testing, and their attitudes towards the use of genetic information. The genetic test would be implemented in routine screening for tubal pathology and identifies SNPs relevant for the immune response causing tubal pathology. METHODS Experienced reproductive specialists working in Dutch Academic Hospitals were interviewed. Based on the results of four interviews a questionnaire was developed and used to survey medical doctors in six out of eight Dutch Academic hospitals. RESULTS 60.4% (n=91) stated that the addition of genetic markers to the Chlamydia trachomatis antibody test (CAT) in screening for tubal pathology would increase screening accuracy. 68.2% (n=90) agreed they would require additional training on clinical genetics. Clinical utility (91.2%, n=91) and cost-effectiveness (95.6%, n=91) were recognized by the respondents as important factors in gaining support for the new screening strategy. CONCLUSION In summary, respondents showed a positive attitude towards the implementation of a genetic test combined with CAT for tubal factor infertility (TFI) screening. To gain their support the majority of respondents agreed that clinical utility, specifically cost-effectiveness, is an important factor. Comprehensive research about economic implications and utility regarding the introduction of genomic markers should be the next step in the implementation strategy. Furthermore, education and training would need to be developed and offered to fertility care professionals about genetic markers, their interpretation, and implications for clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jelena Malogajski
- Institute for Public Health Genomics, Department of Genetics and Cell Biology, Research Institute GROW, Faculty of Health, Medicine & Life Sciences, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Marleen E Jansen
- Institute for Public Health Genomics, Department of Genetics and Cell Biology, Research Institute GROW, Faculty of Health, Medicine & Life Sciences, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Sander Ouburg
- Laboratory of Immunogenetics, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elena Ambrosino
- Institute for Public Health Genomics, Department of Genetics and Cell Biology, Research Institute GROW, Faculty of Health, Medicine & Life Sciences, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline B Terwee
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and the EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Servaas A Morré
- Institute for Public Health Genomics, Department of Genetics and Cell Biology, Research Institute GROW, Faculty of Health, Medicine & Life Sciences, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Laboratory of Immunogenetics, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Cost and Cost-Effectiveness Assessments of Newborn Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Disease Using Pulse Oximetry: A Review. Int J Neonatal Screen 2017; 3:34. [PMID: 29376140 PMCID: PMC5784211 DOI: 10.3390/ijns3040034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Screening newborns for critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) using pulse oximetry is recommended to allow for the prompt diagnosis and prevention of life-threatening crises. The present review summarizes and critiques six previously published estimates of the costs or cost-effectiveness of CCHD screening from the United Kingdom, United States, and China. Several elements that affect CCHD screening costs were assessed in varying numbers of studies, including screening staff time, instrumentation, and consumables, as well as costs of diagnosis and treatment. A previous US study that used conservative assumptions suggested that CCHD screening is likely to be considered cost-effective from the healthcare sector perspective. Newly available estimates of avoided infant CCHD deaths in several US states that implemented mandatory CCHD screening policies during 2011-2013 suggest a substantially larger reduction in deaths than was projected in the previous US cost-effectiveness analysis. Taking into account these new estimates, we estimate that cost per life-year gained could be as low as USD 12,000. However, that estimate does not take into account future costs of health care and education for surviving children with CCHD nor the costs incurred by health departments to support and monitor CCHD screening policies and programs.
Collapse
|
32
|
Antoñanzas F, Juárez-Castelló CA, Rodríguez-Ibeas R. Implementing personalized medicine with asymmetric information on prevalence rates. HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW 2016; 6:35. [PMID: 27539222 PMCID: PMC4990530 DOI: 10.1186/s13561-016-0113-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2016] [Accepted: 07/22/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Although personalized medicine is becoming the new paradigm to manage some diseases, the economics of personalized medicine have only focused on assessing the efficiency of specific treatments, lacking a theoretical framework analyzing the interactions between pharmaceutical firms and healthcare systems leading to the implementation of personalized treatments. We model the interaction between the hospitals and the manufacturer of a new treatment as an adverse selection problem where the firm does not have perfect information on the prevalence across hospitals of the genetic characteristics of the patients making them eligible to receive a new treatment. As a result of the model, hospitals with high prevalence rates benefit from the information asymmetry only when the standard treatment is inefficient when applied to the patients eligible to receive the new treatment. Otherwise, information asymmetry has no value. Personalized medicine may be fully or partially implemented depending on the proportion of high prevalence hospitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando Antoñanzas
- Department of Economics, University of La Rioja, Cigüeña 60, 26006, Logrono, Spain.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Bertier G, Carrot-Zhang J, Ragoussis V, Joly Y. Integrating precision cancer medicine into healthcare-policy, practice, and research challenges. Genome Med 2016; 8:108. [PMID: 27776531 PMCID: PMC5075982 DOI: 10.1186/s13073-016-0362-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Precision medicine (PM) can be defined as a predictive, preventive, personalized, and participatory healthcare service delivery model. Recent developments in molecular biology and information technology make PM a reality today through the use of massive amounts of genetic, ‘omics’, clinical, environmental, and lifestyle data. With cancer being one of the most prominent public health threats in developed countries, both the research community and governments have been investing significant time, money, and efforts in precision cancer medicine (PCM). Although PCM research is extremely promising, a number of hurdles still remain on the road to an optimal integration of standardized and evidence-based use of PCM in healthcare systems. Indeed, PCM raises a number of technical, organizational, ethical, legal, social, and economic challenges that have to be taken into account in the development of an appropriate health policy framework. Here, we highlight some of the more salient issues regarding the standards needed for integration of PCM into healthcare systems, and we identify fields where more research is needed before policy can be implemented. Key challenges include, but are not limited to, the creation of new standards for the collection, analysis, and sharing of samples and data from cancer patients, and the creation of new clinical trial designs with renewed endpoints. We believe that these issues need to be addressed as a matter of priority by public health policymakers in the coming years for a better integration of PCM into healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabrielle Bertier
- Center of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, 740 Dr. Penfield Avenue, Montreal, QC, H3A 0G1, Canada. .,Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier and Inserm UMR 102, 37 allées Jules Guesde, F-31000, Toulouse, France.
| | - Jian Carrot-Zhang
- Center of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, 740 Dr. Penfield Avenue, Montreal, QC, H3A 0G1, Canada
| | - Vassilis Ragoussis
- Sargent College, Boston University, One Silber Way, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Yann Joly
- Center of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, 740 Dr. Penfield Avenue, Montreal, QC, H3A 0G1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Hoogendoorn M, Feenstra TL, Asukai Y, Briggs AH, Borg S, Dal Negro RW, Hansen RN, Jansson SA, Leidl R, Risebrough N, Samyshkin Y, Wacker ME, Rutten-van Mölken MPMH. Patient Heterogeneity in Health Economic Decision Models for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Are Current Models Suitable to Evaluate Personalized Medicine? VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2016; 19:800-810. [PMID: 27712708 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2015] [Revised: 02/18/2016] [Accepted: 04/03/2016] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess how suitable current chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) cost-effectiveness models are to evaluate personalized treatment options for COPD by exploring the type of heterogeneity included in current models and by validating outcomes for subgroups of patients. METHODS A consortium of COPD modeling groups completed three tasks. First, they reported all patient characteristics included in the model and provided the level of detail in which the input parameters were specified. Second, groups simulated disease progression, mortality, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and costs for hypothetical subgroups of patients that differed in terms of sex, age, smoking status, and lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] % predicted). Finally, model outcomes for exacerbations and mortality for subgroups of patients were validated against published subgroup results of two large COPD trials. RESULTS Nine COPD modeling groups participated. Most models included sex (seven), age (nine), smoking status (six), and FEV1% predicted (nine), mainly to specify disease progression and mortality. Trial results showed higher exacerbation rates for women (found in one model), higher mortality rates for men (two models), lower mortality for younger patients (four models), and higher exacerbation and mortality rates in patients with severe COPD (four models). CONCLUSIONS Most currently available COPD cost-effectiveness models are able to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of personalized treatment on the basis of sex, age, smoking, and FEV1% predicted. Treatment in COPD is, however, more likely to be personalized on the basis of clinical parameters. Two models include several clinical patient characteristics and are therefore most suitable to evaluate personalized treatment, although some important clinical parameters are still missing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martine Hoogendoorn
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Talitha L Feenstra
- Department for Prevention and Health Services Research, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Yumi Asukai
- IMS Health, Health Economics and Outcomes Research and Real-World Evidence Solutions, London, UK
| | - Andrew H Briggs
- Institute of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Sixten Borg
- The Swedish Institute for Health Economics, Lund, Sweden; Health Economics Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Evidera, London, UK
| | - Roberto W Dal Negro
- National Center for Respiratory Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmacoepidemiology (CESFAR), Verona, Italy
| | - Ryan N Hansen
- Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research and Policy Program, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Sven-Arne Jansson
- Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, The OLIN Unit, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Reiner Leidl
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institute of Health Economics and Health Care Management, Member of the German Center for Lung Research, Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich, Neuherberg, Germany
| | | | - Yevgeniy Samyshkin
- IMS Health, Health Economics and Outcomes Research and Real-World Evidence Solutions, London, UK
| | - Margarethe E Wacker
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institute of Health Economics and Health Care Management, Member of the German Center for Lung Research, Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich, Neuherberg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Fugel HJ, Nuijten M, Postma M, Redekop K. Economic Evaluation in Stratified Medicine: Methodological Issues and Challenges. Front Pharmacol 2016; 7:113. [PMID: 27242524 PMCID: PMC4861004 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2016.00113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2016] [Accepted: 04/14/2016] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stratified Medicine (SM) is becoming a practical reality with the targeting of medicines by using a biomarker or genetic-based diagnostic to identify the eligible patient sub-population. Like any healthcare intervention, SM interventions have costs and consequences that must be considered by reimbursement authorities with limited resources. Methodological standards and guidelines exist for economic evaluations in clinical pharmacology and are an important component for health technology assessments (HTAs) in many countries. However, these guidelines have initially been developed for traditional pharmaceuticals and not for complex interventions with multiple components. This raises the issue as to whether these guidelines are adequate to SM interventions or whether new specific guidance and methodology is needed to avoid inconsistencies and contradictory findings when assessing economic value in SM. OBJECTIVE This article describes specific methodological challenges when conducting health economic (HE) evaluations for SM interventions and outlines potential modifications necessary to existing evaluation guidelines /principles that would promote consistent economic evaluations for SM. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS Specific methodological aspects for SM comprise considerations on the choice of comparator, measuring effectiveness and outcomes, appropriate modeling structure and the scope of sensitivity analyses. Although current HE methodology can be applied for SM, greater complexity requires further methodology development and modifications in the guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans-Joerg Fugel
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Gronigen Groningen, Netherlands
| | | | - Maarten Postma
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Gronigen Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Ken Redekop
- Institute of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Gonçalves A, Maraninchi D, Marino P. [Anticancer drugs: Which prices for therapeutic innovations?]. Bull Cancer 2016; 103:361-7. [PMID: 27045535 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2016.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2016] [Accepted: 03/17/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The expanding knowledge of the biological mechanisms underlying tumor development made it possible the recent emergence of new therapeutic approaches that are considered as undoubtedly innovative. Yet, to define and to evaluate the magnitude of a drug innovation require an examination of its intrinsic drug properties, medical utility as well as its mode of emergence. Recently, international academic societies, such as ESMO and ASCO, have proposed practical tools that may help quantifying the medical value of a given innovation. Currently, the sustained flux of therapeutic innovations in oncology is associated with an unprecedented growth of costs, the actual determinants of which remain under debate, but raising the critical issue of drugs pricing, and their potential individual or societal "financial toxicity".
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Gonçalves
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, département d'oncologie médicale, 13009 Marseille, France; Centre de recherche en cancérologie de Marseille (institut Paoli-Calmettes, Inserm 1068, CNRS 7258, Aix-Marseille université), 13009 Marseille, France; Aix-Marseille université, 13284 Marseille, France.
| | - Dominique Maraninchi
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, département d'oncologie médicale, 13009 Marseille, France; Centre de recherche en cancérologie de Marseille (institut Paoli-Calmettes, Inserm 1068, CNRS 7258, Aix-Marseille université), 13009 Marseille, France; Aix-Marseille université, 13284 Marseille, France
| | - Patricia Marino
- Aix-Marseille université, 13284 Marseille, France; Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Inserm UMR912 SESSTIM, 13009 Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Economic Evaluations of Pharmacogenetic and Pharmacogenomic Screening Tests: A Systematic Review. Second Update of the Literature. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0146262. [PMID: 26752539 PMCID: PMC4709231 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2015] [Accepted: 12/15/2015] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Due to extended application of pharmacogenetic and pharmacogenomic screening (PGx) tests it is important to assess whether they provide good value for money. This review provides an update of the literature. Methods A literature search was performed in PubMed and papers published between August 2010 and September 2014, investigating the cost-effectiveness of PGx screening tests, were included. Papers from 2000 until July 2010 were included via two previous systematic reviews. Studies’ overall quality was assessed with the Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) instrument. Results We found 38 studies, which combined with the previous 42 studies resulted in a total of 80 included studies. An average QHES score of 76 was found. Since 2010, more studies were funded by pharmaceutical companies. Most recent studies performed cost-utility analysis, univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses, and discussed limitations of their economic evaluations. Most studies indicated favorable cost-effectiveness. Majority of evaluations did not provide information regarding the intrinsic value of the PGx test. There were considerable differences in the costs for PGx testing. Reporting of the direction and magnitude of bias on the cost-effectiveness estimates as well as motivation for the chosen economic model and perspective were frequently missing. Conclusions Application of PGx tests was mostly found to be a cost-effective or cost-saving strategy. We found that only the minority of recent pharmacoeconomic evaluations assessed the intrinsic value of the PGx tests. There was an increase in the number of studies and in the reporting of quality associated characteristics. To improve future evaluations, scenario analysis including a broad range of PGx tests costs and equal costs of comparator drugs to assess the intrinsic value of the PGx tests, are recommended. In addition, robust clinical evidence regarding PGx tests’ efficacy remains of utmost importance.
Collapse
|
38
|
The Importance of Healthy Living and Defining Lifestyle Medicine. LIFESTYLE MEDICINE 2016. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-24687-1_2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
|
39
|
Schremser K, Rogowski WH, Adler-Reichel S, Tufman ALH, Huber RM, Stollenwerk B. Cost-Effectiveness of an Individualized First-Line Treatment Strategy Offering Erlotinib Based on EGFR Mutation Testing in Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients in Germany. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2015; 33:1215-1228. [PMID: 26081300 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-015-0305-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lung cancer is among the top causes of cancer-related deaths. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors can increase progression-free survival compared with standard chemotherapy in patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of EGFR mutation analysis and first-line therapy with erlotinib for mutation-positive patients compared with non-individualized standard chemotherapy from the perspective of German statutory health insurance. METHODS A state transition model was developed for a time horizon of 10 years (reference year 2014). Data sources were published data from the European Tarceva versus Chemotherapy (EURTAC) randomized trial for drug efficacy and safety and German cost data. We additionally performed deterministic, probabilistic and structural sensitivity analyses. RESULTS The individualized strategy incurred 0.013 additional quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and additional costs of € 200, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of € 15,577/QALY. Results were most sensitive to uncertainty in survival curves and changes in utility values. Cross-validating health utility estimates with recent German data increased the ICER to about € 58,000/QALY. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that the individualized strategy is cost-effective, with a probability exceeding 50 % for a range of possible willingness-to-pay thresholds. LIMITATIONS The uncertainty of the predicted survival curves is substantial, particularly for overall survival, which was not a primary endpoint in the EURTAC study. Also, there is limited data on quality of life in metastatic lung cancer patients. CONCLUSIONS Individualized therapy based on EGFR mutation status has the potential to provide a cost-effective alternative to non-individualized care for patients with advanced adenocarcinoma. Further clinical research is needed to confirm these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Schremser
- Helmholtz Zentrum München (GmbH), German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Institute of Health Economics and Health Care Management, Member of the German Center for Lung Research, Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85758, Neuherberg, Germany.
| | - Wolf H Rogowski
- Helmholtz Zentrum München (GmbH), German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Institute of Health Economics and Health Care Management, Member of the German Center for Lung Research, Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85758, Neuherberg, Germany
- Institute and Outpatient Clinic for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Clinical Center, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sigrid Adler-Reichel
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Medical Clinic and Policlinic IV, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Amanda L H Tufman
- Division of Respiratory Medicine and Thoracic Oncology, Medical Clinic and Policlinic V, Thoracic Oncology Centre Munich, University of Munich, Member of the German Center for Lung Research, Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Munich, Germany
| | - Rudolf M Huber
- Division of Respiratory Medicine and Thoracic Oncology, Medical Clinic and Policlinic V, Thoracic Oncology Centre Munich, University of Munich, Member of the German Center for Lung Research, Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Munich, Germany
| | - Björn Stollenwerk
- Helmholtz Zentrum München (GmbH), German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Institute of Health Economics and Health Care Management, Member of the German Center for Lung Research, Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85758, Neuherberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Grosse SD. When is Genomic Testing Cost-Effective? Testing for Lynch Syndrome in Patients with Newly-Diagnosed Colorectal Cancer and Their Relatives. Healthcare (Basel) 2015; 3:860-78. [PMID: 26473097 PMCID: PMC4604059 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare3040860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Varying estimates of the cost-effectiveness of genomic testing applications can reflect differences in study questions, settings, methods and assumptions. This review compares recently published cost-effectiveness analyses of testing strategies for Lynch Syndrome (LS) in tumors from patients newly diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) for either all adult patients or patients up to age 70 along with cascade testing of relatives of probands. Seven studies published from 2010 through 2015 were identified and summarized. Five studies analyzed the universal offer of testing to adult patients with CRC and two others analyzed testing patients up to age 70; all except one reported incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) < $ 100,000 per life-year or quality-adjusted life-year gained. Three studies found lower ICERs for selective testing strategies using family history-based predictive models compared with universal testing. However, those calculations were based on estimates of sensitivity of predictive models derived from research studies, and it is unclear how sensitive such models are in routine clinical practice. Key model parameters that are influential in ICER estimates included 1) the number of first-degree relatives tested per proband identified with LS and 2) the cost of gene sequencing. Others include the frequency of intensive colonoscopic surveillance, the cost of colonoscopy, and the inclusion of extracolonic surveillance and prevention options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott D Grosse
- National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA; Tel.: +404-498-3074
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
Clinically relevant examples of stratified medicine are available for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this study was to understand the current economic evidence for stratified medicine in RA. Two systematic reviews were conducted to identify: (1) all economic evaluations of stratified treatments for rheumatoid arthritis, or those which have used a subgroup analysis, and (2) all stated preference studies of treatments for rheumatoid arthritis. Ten economic evaluations of stratified treatments for RA, 38 economic evaluations including with a subgroup analysis and eight stated preference studies were identified. There was some evidence to support that stratified approaches to treating a patient with RA may be cost-effective. However, there remain key gaps in the economic evidence base needed to support the introduction of stratified medicine in RA into healthcare systems and considerable uncertainty about how proposed stratified approaches will impact future patient preferences, outcomes and costs when used in routine practice.
Collapse
|
42
|
Shabaruddin FH, Fleeman ND, Payne K. Economic evaluations of personalized medicine: existing challenges and current developments. Pharmgenomics Pers Med 2015; 8:115-26. [PMID: 26309416 PMCID: PMC4538689 DOI: 10.2147/pgpm.s35063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Personalized medicine, with the aim of safely, effectively, and cost-effectively targeting treatment to a prespecified patient population, has always been a long-time goal within health care. It is often argued that personalizing treatment will inevitably improve clinical outcomes for patients and help achieve more effective use of health care resources. Demand is increasing for demonstrable evidence of clinical and cost-effectiveness to support the use of personalized medicine in health care. This paper begins with an overview of the existing challenges in conducting economic evaluations of genetics- and genomics-targeted technologies, as an example of personalized medicine. Our paper illustrates the complexity of the challenges faced by these technologies by highlighting the variations in the issues faced by diagnostic tests for somatic variations, generally referring to genetic variation in a tumor, and germline variations, generally referring to inherited genetic variation in enzymes involved in drug metabolic pathways. These tests are typically aimed at stratifying patient populations into subgroups on the basis of clinical effectiveness (response) or safety (avoidance of adverse events). The paper summarizes the data requirements for economic evaluations of genetics and genomics-based technologies while outlining that the main challenges relating to data requirements revolve around the availability and quality of existing data. We conclude by discussing current developments aimed to address the challenges of assessing the cost-effectiveness of genetics and genomics-based technologies, which revolve around two central issues that are interlinked: the need to adapt available evaluation methods and identifying who is responsible for generating evidence for these technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nigel D Fleeman
- Liverpool Reviews and Implementation Group (LRiG), University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Katherine Payne
- Institute of Population Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Antoñanzas F, Juárez-Castelló CA, Rodríguez-Ibeas R. Is personalized medicine a panacea for health management? Some thoughts on its desirability. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2015; 16:455-457. [PMID: 25501260 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-014-0665-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
|
44
|
Economic evidence on identifying clinically actionable findings with whole-genome sequencing: a scoping review. Genet Med 2015; 18:111-6. [PMID: 25996638 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2015.69] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2014] [Accepted: 04/15/2015] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) recommends that mutations in 56 genes for 24 conditions are clinically actionable and should be reported as secondary findings after whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Our aim was to identify published economic evaluations of detecting mutations in these genes among the general population or among targeted/high-risk populations and conditions and identify gaps in knowledge. A targeted PubMed search from 1994 through November 2014 was performed, and we included original, English-language articles reporting cost-effectiveness or a cost-to-utility ratio or net benefits/benefit-cost focused on screening (not treatment) for conditions and genes listed by the ACMG. Articles were screened, classified as targeting a high-risk or general population, and abstracted by two reviewers. General population studies were evaluated for actual cost-effectiveness measures (e.g., incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER)), whereas studies of targeted populations were evaluated for whether at least one scenario proposed was cost-effective (e.g., ICER of ≤$100,000 per life-year or quality-adjusted life-year gained). A total of 607 studies were identified, and 32 relevant studies were included. Identified studies addressed fewer than one-third (7 of 24; 29%) of the ACMG conditions. The cost-effectiveness of screening in the general population was examined for only 2 of 24 conditions (8%). The cost-effectiveness of most genetic findings that the ACMG recommends for return has not been evaluated in economic studies or in the context of screening in the general population. The individual studies do not directly address the cost-effectiveness of WGS.
Collapse
|
45
|
Rogowski W, Payne K, Schnell-Inderst P, Manca A, Rochau U, Jahn B, Alagoz O, Leidl R, Siebert U. Concepts of 'personalization' in personalized medicine: implications for economic evaluation. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2015; 33:49-59. [PMID: 25249200 PMCID: PMC4422179 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-014-0211-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT This study assesses if, and how, existing methods for economic evaluation are applicable to the evaluation of personalized medicine (PM) and, if not, where extension to methods may be required. METHODS A structured workshop was held with a predefined group of experts (n = 47), and was run using a modified nominal group technique. Workshop findings were recorded using extensive note taking, and summarized using thematic data analysis. The workshop was complemented by structured literature searches. RESULTS The key finding emerging from the workshop, using an economic perspective, was that two distinct, but linked, interpretations of the concept of PM exist (personalization by 'physiology' or 'preferences'). These interpretations involve specific challenges for the design and conduct of economic evaluations. Existing evaluative (extra-welfarist) frameworks were generally considered appropriate for evaluating PM. When 'personalization' is viewed as using physiological biomarkers, challenges include representing complex care pathways; representing spillover effects; meeting data requirements such as evidence on heterogeneity; and choosing appropriate time horizons for the value of further research in uncertainty analysis. When viewed as tailoring medicine to patient preferences, further work is needed regarding revealed preferences, e.g. treatment (non)adherence; stated preferences, e.g. risk interpretation and attitude; consideration of heterogeneity in preferences; and the appropriate framework (welfarism vs. extra-welfarism) to incorporate non-health benefits. CONCLUSIONS Ideally, economic evaluations should take account of both interpretations of PM and consider physiology and preferences. It is important for decision makers to be cognizant of the issues involved with the economic evaluation of PM to appropriately interpret the evidence and target future research funding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolf Rogowski
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institute of Health Economics and Health Care Management, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Wahbeh H, Svalina MN, Oken BS. Group, One-on-One, or Internet? Preferences for Mindfulness Meditation Delivery Format and their Predictors. OPEN MEDICINE JOURNAL 2014; 1:66-74. [PMID: 27057260 PMCID: PMC4820831 DOI: 10.2174/1874220301401010066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2014] [Revised: 10/02/2014] [Accepted: 10/10/2014] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Group mindfulness meditation interventions have improved symptoms in many health conditions. However, many people are unwilling to receive group treatment, so alternative delivery methods such as individual and internet may be a useful option. The study objective was to examine mindfulness meditation intervention delivery format preferences and their relationship to potential predictors. DESIGN An online survey was conducted of adult English speakers. Data was collected on interest and preference for internet, individual, or group formats of a mindfulness meditation intervention. Age, gender, personality, and posttraumatic stress disorder score and status and depression status were also collected. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS 500 eligible participants completed the survey (mean age 39±15; range 18-70; 68% female). Participants were more interested in the Internet (n=356) and individual formats (n=384) than the group format (n=245). Fifty-five participants (11%) said they would refuse a group format. Internet was the first choice format for most participants (Internet 212 (43%), Individual 187 (38%), Group 97 (20%) and group was the last choice for most participants (Internet 140 (29%), Individual 70 (14%), Group 279 (57%)). Age, extraversion and emotional stability were significant in predicting first choice format. These results support the need for more research and implementation of alternative mindfulness meditation intervention delivery formats. Future research will incorporate additional predictors and include a broader range of participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helané Wahbeh
- Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
- National College of Natural Medicine, Portland, Oregon
| | | | - Barry S. Oken
- Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Paul Moatti
- Université d'Aix-Marseille-AMU UMR 912 AMU-Inserm-IRD (sciences économiques et sociales de la santé et traitement de l'information médicale- SESSTIM) UMR912 23, rue Stanislas Torrents, 13006 Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Points to consider for prioritizing clinical genetic testing services: a European consensus process oriented at accountability for reasonableness. Eur J Hum Genet 2014; 23:729-35. [PMID: 25248395 PMCID: PMC4795066 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2014] [Revised: 08/11/2014] [Accepted: 08/19/2014] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Given the cost constraints of the European health-care systems, criteria are needed to decide which genetic services to fund from the public budgets, if not all can be covered. To ensure that high-priority services are available equitably within and across the European countries, a shared set of prioritization criteria would be desirable. A decision process following the accountability for reasonableness framework was undertaken, including a multidisciplinary EuroGentest/PPPC-ESHG workshop to develop shared prioritization criteria. Resources are currently too limited to fund all the beneficial genetic testing services available in the next decade. Ethically and economically reflected prioritization criteria are needed. Prioritization should be based on considerations of medical benefit, health need and costs. Medical benefit includes evidence of benefit in terms of clinical benefit, benefit of information for important life decisions, benefit for other people apart from the person tested and the patient-specific likelihood of being affected by the condition tested for. It may be subject to a finite time window. Health need includes the severity of the condition tested for and its progression at the time of testing. Further discussion and better evidence is needed before clearly defined recommendations can be made or a prioritization algorithm proposed. To our knowledge, this is the first time a clinical society has initiated a decision process about health-care prioritization on a European level, following the principles of accountability for reasonableness. We provide points to consider to stimulate this debate across the EU and to serve as a reference for improving patient management.
Collapse
|