1
|
Xu RH, Wong ELY, Luo N, Norman R, Lehmann J, Holzner B, King MT, Kemmler G. The EORTC QLU-C10D: the Hong Kong valuation study. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2024; 25:889-901. [PMID: 37768519 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-023-01632-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The EORTC QLU-C10D is a new preference-based measure derived from the EORTC QLQ-C30. Country-specific value sets are required to support the cost-utility analysis of cancer-related interventions. This study aimed to generate an EORTC QLU-C10 value set for Hong Kong (HK). METHODS A HK online panel was quota-sampled to achieve an adult general population sample representative by sex and age. Participants were invited to complete an online discrete choice experiment survey. Each participant was asked to complete 16 choice-pairs, randomly assigned from a total of 960 choice-pairs, each comprising two QLU-C10D health states and a duration attribute. Conditional and mixed logistic regression analyses were used to analyse the data. RESULTS The analysis included data from 1041 respondents who had successfully completed the online survey. The distribution of sex did not differ from that of the general population, but a significant difference was found among age groups. A weighting analysis for non-representative variable (age) was used. Utility decrements were generally monotonic, with the largest decrements for physical functioning (- 0.308), role functioning (- 0.165), and pain (- 0.161). The mean QLU-C10D utility score of the participants was 0.804 (median = 0.838, worst to best = - 0.169 to 1). The value of the worst health state was - 0.223, which was sufficiently lower than 0 (being dead). CONCLUSIONS This study established HK utility weights for the QLU-C10D, which can facilitate cost-utility analyses across cancer-related health programmes and technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Huan Xu
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong SAR, China.
- JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Sha Tin, Hong Kong SAR, China.
| | - Eliza Lai-Yi Wong
- JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Sha Tin, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Nan Luo
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, The National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Richard Norman
- School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Jens Lehmann
- Division of Psychiatry II, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Bernhard Holzner
- Division of Psychiatry II, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Madeleine T King
- School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Georg Kemmler
- Division of Psychiatry I, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shiroiwa T, King MT, Norman R, Müller F, Campbell R, Kemmler G, Murata T, Shimozuma K, Fukuda T. Japanese value set for the EORTC QLU-C10D: A multi-attribute utility instrument based on the EORTC QLQ-C30 cancer-specific quality-of-life questionnaire. Qual Life Res 2024; 33:1865-1879. [PMID: 38724771 PMCID: PMC11176232 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-024-03655-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to develop a Japanese value set for the EORTC QLU-C10D, a multi-attribute utility measure derived from the cancer-specific health-related quality-of-life (HRQL) questionnaire, the EORTC QLQ-C30. The QLU-C10D contains ten HRQL dimensions: physical, role, social and emotional functioning, pain, fatigue, sleep, appetite, nausea, and bowel problems. METHODS Quota sampling of a Japanese online panel was used to achieve representativeness of the Japanese general population by sex and age (≥ 18 years). The valuation method was an online discrete choice experiment. Each participant considered 16 choice pairs, randomly assigned from 960 choice pairs. Each pair included two QLU-C10D health states and life expectancy. Data were analyzed using conditional logistic regression, parameterized to fit the quality-adjusted life-year framework. Preference weights were calculated as the ratio of each dimension-level coefficient to the coefficient for life expectancy. RESULTS A total of 2809 eligible panel members consented, 2662/2809 (95%) completed at least one choice pair, and 2435/2662 (91%) completed all choice pairs. Within dimensions, preference weights were generally monotonic. Physical functioning, role functioning, and pain were associated with the largest utility weights. Intermediate utility weights were associated with social functioning and nausea; the remaining symptoms and emotional functioning were associated with smaller utility decrements. The value of the worst health state was - 0.221, lower than that seen in most other existing QLU-C10D country-specific value sets. CONCLUSIONS The Japan-specific QLU-C10D value set is suitable for evaluating the cost and utility of oncology treatments for Japanese health technology assessment and decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Shiroiwa
- Center for Outcomes Research and Economic Evaluation for Health (C2H), National Institute of Public Health, Wako, Saitama, Japan.
| | - M T King
- Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Group, Brussels, Belgium
| | - R Norman
- School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - F Müller
- Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Global Health, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - R Campbell
- Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - G Kemmler
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Group, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics I, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - T Murata
- Crecon Medical Assessment Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan
| | - K Shimozuma
- College of Life Sciences, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Japan
| | - T Fukuda
- Center for Outcomes Research and Economic Evaluation for Health (C2H), National Institute of Public Health, Wako, Saitama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tsui TCO, Torres SC, Bielecki JM, Mitsakakis N, Trudeau ME, Bremner KE, Davis AM, Krahn MD. A scoping review to create a framework for the steps in developing condition-specific preference-based instruments de novo or from an existing non-preference-based instrument: use of item response theory or Rasch analysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2024; 22:38. [PMID: 38745165 PMCID: PMC11094879 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-024-02253-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is no widely accepted framework to guide the development of condition-specific preference-based instruments (CSPBIs) that includes both de novo and from existing non-preference-based instruments. The purpose of this study was to address this gap by reviewing the published literature on CSPBIs, with particular attention to the application of item response theory (IRT) and Rasch analysis in their development. METHODS A scoping review of the literature covering the concepts of all phases of CSPBI development and evaluation was performed from MEDLINE, Embase, PsychInfo, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library, from inception to December 30, 2022. RESULTS The titles and abstracts of 1,967 unique references were reviewed. After retrieving and reviewing 154 full-text articles, data were extracted from 109 articles, representing 41 CSPBIs covering 21 diseases or conditions. The development of CSPBIs was conceptualized as a 15-step framework, covering four phases: 1) develop initial questionnaire items (when no suitable non-preference-based instrument exists), 2) establish the dimensional structure, 3) reduce items per dimension, 4) value and model health state utilities. Thirty-nine instruments used a type of Rasch model and two instruments used IRT models in phase 3. CONCLUSION We present an expanded framework that outlines the development of CSPBIs, both from existing non-preference-based instruments and de novo when no suitable non-preference-based instrument exists, using IRT and Rasch analysis. For items that fit the Rasch model, developers selected one item per dimension and explored item response level reduction. This framework will guide researchers who are developing or assessing CSPBIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa C O Tsui
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Child Health and Evaluative Sciences, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Sofia C Torres
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Joanna M Bielecki
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nicholas Mitsakakis
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Maureen E Trudeau
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Karen E Bremner
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Aileen M Davis
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Murray D Krahn
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Carrillo de Albornoz S, Higgins AM, Petrie D, Irving A, Fanning L, Weinkove R, Crispin P, Dendle C, Gilbertson M, Johnston A, Keegan A, Pepperell D, Pullon H, Reynolds J, van Tonder T, Trotman J, Waters N, Wellard C, Weston H, Morrissey CO, Wood EM, McQuilten ZK. Economic evaluation: immunoglobulin vs prophylactic antibiotics in hypogammaglobulinemia and hematological malignancies. Blood Adv 2024; 8:2259-2267. [PMID: 38484199 PMCID: PMC11116992 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023012047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 05/15/2024] Open
Abstract
ABSTRACT Patients with hematological malignancies are at high risk of developing hypogammaglobulinemia (HGG) and infections. Immunoglobulin (Ig) is one recommended option to prevent these infections, but it is expensive, and its cost-effectiveness compared with other prevention strategies remains unknown. We conducted a trial-based economic evaluation from the Australian health care system perspective to estimate the 12-month cost-effectiveness of prophylactic Ig vs prophylactic antibiotics in 63 adults with HGG and hematological malignancies participating in the RATIONAL feasibility trial. Two analyses were conducted: (1) cost-utility analysis to assess the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained; and (2) cost-effectiveness analysis to assess the incremental cost per serious infection prevented (grade ≥3) and per any infection (any grade) prevented. Over 12 months, the total cost per patient was significantly higher in the Ig group than in the antibiotic group (mean difference, AU$29 140; P < .001). Most patients received IVIg, which was the main cost driver; only 2 patients in the intervention arm received subcutaneous Ig. There were nonsignificant differences in health outcomes. Results showed Ig was more costly than antibiotics and associated with fewer QALYs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of Ig vs antibiotics was AU$111 262 per serious infection prevented, but Ig was more costly and associated with more infections when all infections were included. On average and for this patient population, Ig prophylaxis may not be cost-effective compared with prophylactic antibiotics. Further research is needed to confirm these findings in a larger population and considering longer-term outcomes. The trial was registered at the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry as #ACTRN12616001723471.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Carrillo de Albornoz
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Health Economics, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Alisa M. Higgins
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Dennis Petrie
- Centre for Health Economics, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Adam Irving
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Health Economics, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Laura Fanning
- Centre for Health Economics, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Robert Weinkove
- Te Rerenga Ora Wellington Blood & Cancer Centre, Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand Capital, Coast & Hutt Valley, Wellington, New Zealand
- Cancer Immunotherapy Programme, Malaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand
- Department of Pathology & Molecular Medicine, University of Otago Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Philip Crispin
- Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia
- School of Medicine and Psychology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Claire Dendle
- Monash Infectious Diseases, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia
- School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Anna Johnston
- Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Australia
- University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
| | - Anastazia Keegan
- PathWest Laboratory Medicine, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | | | - Humphrey Pullon
- Department of Haematology, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - John Reynolds
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Tina van Tonder
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Judith Trotman
- Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Neil Waters
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Cameron Wellard
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Helen Weston
- Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Sunshine Coast, Australia
| | - C. Orla Morrissey
- Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Erica M. Wood
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Zoe K. McQuilten
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Clinical Haematology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pilz MJ, Seyringer S, Al-Naesan I, King MT, Bottomley A, Norman R, Schlosser L, Hell T, Gamper EM. Cancer-Specific Health Utilities: Evaluation of Core Measurement Properties of the EORTC QLU-C10D in Lung Cancer Patients-Data from Four Multicentre LUX-Lung Trials, Applying Six Country Tariffs. PHARMACOECONOMICS - OPEN 2024:10.1007/s41669-024-00484-9. [PMID: 38696019 DOI: 10.1007/s41669-024-00484-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cost-utility analysis generally requires valid preference-based measures (PBMs) to assess the utility of patient health. While generic PBMs are widely used, disease-specific PBMs may capture additional aspects of health relevant for certain patient populations. This study investigates the construct and concurrent criterion validity of the cancer-specific European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Utility-Core 10 dimensions (QLU-C10D) in non-small-cell lung cancer patients. METHODS We retrospectively analysed data from four multicentre LUX-Lung trials, all of which had administered the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and the EQ-5D-3L. We applied six country-specific value sets (Australia, Canada, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, and the United Kingdom) to both instruments. Criterion validity was assessed via correlations between the instruments' utility scores. Correlations of divergent and convergent domains and Bland-Altman plots investigated construct validity. Floor and ceiling effects were assessed. RESULTS The comparison of the EORTC QLU-C10D and EQ-5D-3L produced homogenous results for five of the six country tariffs. High correlations of utilities (r > 0.7) were found for all country tariffs except for the Netherlands. Moderate to high correlations of converging domain pairs (r from 0.472 to 0.718) were found with few exceptions, such as the Social Functioning-Usual Activities domain pair (max. r = 0.376). For all but the Dutch tariff, the EORTC QLU-C10D produced consistently lower utility values compared to the EQ-5D-3L (x̄ difference from - 0.082 to 0.033). Floor and ceiling effects were consistently lower for the EORTC QLU-C10D (max. 4.67% for utilities). CONCLUSIONS The six country tariffs showed good psychometric properties for the EORTC QLU-C10D in lung cancer patients. Criterion and construct validity was established. The QLU-C10D showed superior measurement precision towards the upper and lower end of the scale compared to the EQ-5D-3L, which is important when cost-utility analysis seeks to measure health change across the severity spectrum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Micha J Pilz
- University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Simone Seyringer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Imad Al-Naesan
- University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Madeleine T King
- School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Andrew Bottomley
- Quality of Life Department, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Richard Norman
- School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Lisa Schlosser
- Department of Mathematics, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Tobias Hell
- Department of Mathematics, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Eva Maria Gamper
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lehmann J, Rojas-Concha L, Petersen MA, Holzner B, Norman R, King MT, Kemmler G. Danish value sets for the EORTC QLU-C10D utility instrument. Qual Life Res 2024; 33:831-841. [PMID: 38183563 PMCID: PMC10894119 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-023-03569-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/08/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE In this study, we developed Danish utility weights for the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLU-C10D, a cancer-specific utility instrument based on the EORTC QLQ-C30. METHODS Following a standardized methodology, 1001 adult participants from the Danish general population were quota-sampled and completed a cross-sectional web-based survey and discrete choice experiment (DCE). In the DCE, participants considered 16 choice sets constructed from the key 10 dimensions of the QLU-C10D and chose their preferred health state for each one. Utility weights were calculated using conditional logistic regression with correction for non-monotonicity. RESULTS The sample (n = 1001) was representative of the Danish general population with regard to age and gender. The domains with the largest utility decrements, i.e., the domains with the biggest impact on health utility, were physical functioning (- 0.224), pain (- 0.160), and role functioning (- 0.136). The smallest utility decrements were observed for the domains lack of appetite (- 0.024), sleep disorders (- 0.057), and fatigue (- 0.064). Non-monotonicity of severity levels was observed for the domains sleep disturbances, lack of appetite, and bowel problems. Deviations from monotonicity were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION The EORTC QLU-C10D is a relatively new multi-attribute utility instrument and is a promising cancer-specific health technology assessment candidate measure. The country-specific Danish utility weights from this study can be used for cost-utility analyses in Danish patients and for comparison with other country-specific utility data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens Lehmann
- University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraße 36, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
- University Hospital of Psychiatry I, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - Leslye Rojas-Concha
- Palliative Care Research Unit, Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine GP, Bispebjerg & Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Morten Aagaard Petersen
- Palliative Care Research Unit, Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine GP, Bispebjerg & Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Bernhard Holzner
- University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraße 36, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Richard Norman
- School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Madeleine T King
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Georg Kemmler
- University Hospital of Psychiatry I, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nielsen LK, Schjesvold F, Möller S, Guldbrandsen N, Hansson M, Remes K, Peceliunas V, Abildgaard N, Gregersen H, King MT. Health-related quality of life and quality-adjusted progression free survival for carfilzomib and dexamethasone maintenance following salvage autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma: a randomized phase 2 trial by the Nordic Myeloma Study Group. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2024; 8:15. [PMID: 38315268 PMCID: PMC10844184 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-024-00691-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Decisions regarding maintenance therapy in patients with multiple myeloma should be based on both treatment efficacy and health-related quality of life (HRQL) consequences. In the CARFI trial, patients with first relapse of multiple myeloma underwent salvage autologous stem cell transplantation (salvage ASCT) before randomization to carfilzomib-dexamethasone maintenance therapy (Kd) or observation. The primary clinical endpoint was time to progression, which was extended by 8 months by Kd. The aim of this paper is to present the all HRQL endpoints of the CARFI trial including the HRQL effect of Kd maintenance therapy relative to observation. The primary HRQL endpoint was assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30 Summary score (QLQ-C30-sum) at 8 months follow-up. A key secondary HRQL endpoint was quality-adjusted progression-free-survival (QAPFS). METHODS HRQL was assessed with EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-MY20 and FACT/GOG-Ntx at randomization and every second month during follow-up. HRQL data were analyzed with linear mixed effect models until 8 months follow-up. QAPFS per individual was calculated by multiplying progression-free survival (PFS) by two quality-adjustment metrics, the QLQ-C30-sum and EORTC Quality of Life Utility Measure-Core 10 dimensions (QLU-C10D). The QAPFS per treatment group was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. P < 0.05 was used for statistical significance, and a between-group minimal important difference of 10 points was interpreted as clinically relevant for the QLQ-C30-sum. RESULTS 168 patients were randomized. HRQL questionnaire compliance was 93%. For the QLQ-C30-sum, the difference of 4.62 points (95% confidence interval (CI) -8.9: -0.4, p = 0.032) was not clinically relevant. PFS was 19.3 months for the Kd maintenance group and 16.8 months for the observation group; difference = 2.5 months (95% CI 0.5; 4.5). QAPFS based on the QLQ-C30-sum for the Kd maintenance group was 18.0 months (95% CI 16.4; 19.6) and for the observation group 15.0 months (95% CI 13.5; 16.5); difference = 3.0 months (95% CI 0.8-5.3). QAPFS based on the QLU-C10D for the Kd maintenance group was 17.5 months (95% CI 15.9; 19.2) and 14.0 months (95% CI 12.4; 15.5) for the observation group; difference = 3.5 months (95% CI 1.1-5.9). CONCLUSIONS Kd maintenance therapy after salvage ASCT did not adversely affect overall HRQL, but adjustment for HRQL reduced the PFS compared to unadjusted PFS. PFS of maintenance therapy should be quality-adjusted to balance the benefits and HRQL impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lene Kongsgaard Nielsen
- Quality of life Research Center, Department of Hematology, Odense University Hospital, DK-5000, Odense, Denmark.
- Department of Hematology, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark.
- Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
| | - Fredrik Schjesvold
- Oslo Myeloma Center, Department of Hematology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- KG Jebsen Center for B cell malignancies, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sören Möller
- Open Patient data Explorative Network, OPEN, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Nina Guldbrandsen
- Oslo Myeloma Center, Department of Hematology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Markus Hansson
- Department of Hematology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Kari Remes
- Department of Hematology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Valdas Peceliunas
- Department of Hematology, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Niels Abildgaard
- Quality of life Research Center, Department of Hematology, Odense University Hospital, DK-5000, Odense, Denmark
- Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Open Patient data Explorative Network, OPEN, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Henrik Gregersen
- Department of Hematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Madeleine T King
- Quality of life Research Center, Department of Hematology, Odense University Hospital, DK-5000, Odense, Denmark
- School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Roberts MJ, Conduit C, Davis ID, Effeney RM, Williams S, Martin JM, Hofman MS, Hruby G, Eapen R, Gianacas C, Papa N, Lourenço RDA, Dhillon HM, Allen R, Fontela A, Kaur B, Emmett L. The Dedicated Imaging Post-Prostatectomy for Enhanced Radiotherapy outcomes (DIPPER) trial protocol: a multicentre, randomised trial of salvage radiotherapy versus surveillance for low-risk biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2024; 133 Suppl 3:39-47. [PMID: 37604702 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Salvage radiation therapy (SRT) and surveillance for low-risk prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence have competing risks and benefits. The efficacy of early SRT to the prostate bed with or without pelvic lymph nodes compared to surveillance in patients with PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy and no identifiable recurrent disease evident on prostate specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography/computer tomography (PSMA-PET/CT) is unknown. STUDY DESIGN The Dedicated Imaging Post-Prostatectomy for Enhanced Radiotherapy outcomes (DIPPER) is an open-label, multicentre, randomised Phase II trial. ENDPOINTS The primary endpoint is 3-year event-free survival, with events comprising one of PSA recurrence (PSA ≥0.2 ng/mL higher than baseline), radiological evidence of metastatic disease, or initiation of systemic or other salvage treatments. Secondary endpoints include patient-reported outcomes, treatment patterns, participant perceptions, and cost-effectiveness. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Eligible participants have PSA recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy, defined by serum PSA level of 0.2-0.5 ng/mL, deemed low risk according to modified European Association of Urology biochemical recurrence risk criteria (International Society for Urological Pathology Grade Group ≤2, PSA doubling time >12 months), with no definite/probable recurrent prostate cancer on PSMA-PET/CT. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 100 participants will be recruited from five Australian centres and randomised 1:1 to SRT or surveillance. Participants will undergo 6-monthly clinical evaluation for up to 36 months. Androgen-deprivation therapy is not permissible. Enrolment commenced May 2023. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial has been registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN: ACTRN12622001478707).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Roberts
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (ANZUP), Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Qld, Australia
- Redcliffe Hospital, Redcliffe, Qld, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
| | - Ciara Conduit
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (ANZUP), Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Ian D Davis
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (ANZUP), Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Eastern Health, Box Hill, Vic., Australia
- Monash University Eastern Health Clinical School, Box Hill, Clayton, Vic., Australia
| | - Rachel M Effeney
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (ANZUP), Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Qld, Australia
- Redcliffe Hospital, Redcliffe, Qld, Australia
| | - Scott Williams
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (ANZUP), Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Jarad M Martin
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (ANZUP), Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
- University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
- Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence (ProsTIC), Peter MacCallum Centre, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - George Hruby
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (ANZUP), Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- St Vincent's Clinic, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Renu Eapen
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (ANZUP), Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, Vic., Australia
- Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Vic., Australia
| | - Chris Gianacas
- School of Population Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- The George Institute for Global Health, Newtown, NSW, Australia
| | - Nathan Papa
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (ANZUP), Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Richard De Abreu Lourenço
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (ANZUP), Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Haryana M Dhillon
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (ANZUP), Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Ray Allen
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (ANZUP), Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Antoinette Fontela
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (ANZUP), Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Baldeep Kaur
- The George Institute for Global Health, Newtown, NSW, Australia
| | - Louise Emmett
- The Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (ANZUP), Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- University of NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bulamu NB, Chen G, McGrane E, Cock C, Young GP, Symonds EL. Health utility assessments in individuals undergoing diagnostic and surveillance colonoscopy: improved discrimination with a cancer-specific scale. Cancer Causes Control 2024; 35:347-357. [PMID: 37747615 PMCID: PMC10787680 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-023-01789-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the sensitivity and discriminant validity of generic and cancer-specific measures for assessing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for individuals undergoing diagnostic or surveillance colonoscopy for colorectal cancer. METHODS HRQoL was assessed using EQ-5D-5L (generic), and EORTC QLQ-C30 (cancer-specific) scales, 14 days after (baseline) and one-year following colonoscopy (follow-up). Utility scores were calculated by mapping EORTC-QLQ-C30 onto QLU-C10D. Differences between participants with different indications for colonoscopy (positive faecal occult blood test (FOBT), surveillance, or symptoms) and colonoscopy findings (no polyps, polyps, or cancer) were tested using Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis H tests. Sensitivity was assessed by calculating the ceiling effects (proportion reporting the best possible level). RESULTS 246 adults completed the survey, including those undergoing colonoscopy for symptoms (n = 87), positive FOBT (n = 92) or surveillance (n = 67). Those with symptoms had the lowest HRQoL at both baseline and follow-up, with differences observed within the HRQoL domains/areas of role function, appetite loss and bowel function on the QLU-C10D. No differences were found in HRQoL when stratified by findings at colonoscopy with both measures or when comparing baseline and follow-up responses. Participants reporting full health with EQ-5D-5L (21% at baseline and 16% at follow-up) still had problems on the QLU-C10D, with fatigue and sleep at baseline and with role function and fatigue at follow-up. CONCLUSION Patients undergoing colonoscopy for symptoms had lower HRQoL compared to surveillance or positive FOBT. The cancer-specific QLU-C10D was more sensitive and had greater discriminant ability between patients undergoing colonoscopy for different indications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norma B Bulamu
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
| | - Gang Chen
- Monash Business School, Centre for Health Economics, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Ellen McGrane
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Charles Cock
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Gastroenterology Department, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Graeme P Young
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Erin L Symonds
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Gastroenterology Department, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
McCaffrey N, Ratcliffe J, Currow D, Engel L, Hutchinson C. What Aspects of Quality of Life are Important from Palliative Care Patients' Perspectives? A Framework Analysis to Inform Preference-Based Measures for Palliative and End-of-Life Settings. THE PATIENT 2024; 17:39-52. [PMID: 37975965 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-023-00651-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Preference-based outcome measures are commonly applied in economic analyses to inform healthcare resource allocation decisions. Few preference-based outcome measures have been specifically developed for palliative and end-of-life settings. This study aimed to identify which quality-of-life domains are most important to Australians receiving specialised palliative care services to help determine if the development of a new condition-specific preference-based outcome measure is warranted. METHODS In-depth face-to-face interviews were conducted with 18 participants recruited from palliative care services in South Australia. Data were analysed using a framework analysis drawing on findings from a systematic review of international qualitative studies investigating the quality-of-life preferences of patients receiving palliation (domains identified included cognitive, emotional, healthcare, personal autonomy, physical, preparatory, social, spiritual). Participants identified missing or irrelevant domains in the EQ-5D and QLU-C10D questionnaires and ranked the importance of domains. RESULTS A priori domains were refined into cognitive, environmental, financial, independence, physical, psychological, social and spiritual. The confirmation of the eight important quality-of-life domains across multiple international studies suggests there is a relatively high degree of convergence on the perspectives of patients in different countries. Four domains derived from the interviews are not covered by the EQ-5D and QLU-C10D (cognitive, environmental, financial, spiritual), including one of the most important (spiritual). CONCLUSIONS Existing, popular, preference-based outcome measures such as the EQ-5D do not incorporate the most important, patient-valued, quality-of-life domains in the palliative and end-of-life settings. Development of a new, more relevant and comprehensive preference-based outcome measure could improve the allocation of resources to patient-valued services and have wide applicability internationally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikki McCaffrey
- Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin Health Economics, SHSD, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
| | - Julie Ratcliffe
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - David Currow
- Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Lidia Engel
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Claire Hutchinson
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
King MT, Revicki DA, Norman R, Müller F, Viney RC, Pickard AS, Cella D, Shaw JW. United States Value Set for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General Eight Dimensions (FACT-8D), a Cancer-Specific Preference-Based Quality of Life Instrument. PHARMACOECONOMICS - OPEN 2024; 8:49-63. [PMID: 38060096 PMCID: PMC10781923 DOI: 10.1007/s41669-023-00448-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop a value set reflecting the United States (US) general population's preferences for health states described by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) eight-dimensions preference-based multi-attribute utility instrument (FACT-8D), derived from the FACT-General cancer-specific health-related quality-of-life (HRQL) questionnaire. METHODS A US online panel was quota-sampled to achieve a general population sample representative by sex, age (≥ 18 years), race and ethnicity. A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was used to value health states. The valuation task involved choosing between pairs of health states (choice-sets) described by varying levels of the FACT-8D HRQL dimensions and survival (life-years). The DCE included 100 choice-sets; each respondent was randomly allocated 16 choice-sets. Data were analysed using conditional logit regression parameterized to fit the quality-adjusted life-year framework, weighted for sociodemographic variables that were non-representative of the US general population. Preference weights were calculated as the ratio of HRQL-level coefficients to the survival coefficient. RESULTS 2562 panel members opted in, 2462 (96%) completed at least one choice-set and 2357 (92%) completed 16 choice-sets. Pain and nausea were associated with the largest utility weights, work and sleep had more moderate utility weights, and sadness, worry and support had the smallest utility weights. Within dimensions, more severe HRQL levels were generally associated with larger weights. A preference-weighting algorithm to estimate US utilities from responses to the FACT-General questionnaire was generated. The worst health state's value was -0.33. CONCLUSIONS This value set provides US population utilities for health states defined by the FACT-8D for use in evaluating oncology treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madeleine T King
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - D A Revicki
- Revicki Outcomes Research Consulting, Sarasota, FL, USA
| | - R Norman
- School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - F Müller
- Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R C Viney
- Centre for Health Economics Research & Evaluation, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - A S Pickard
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - D Cella
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - J W Shaw
- Patient-Reported Outcomes Assessment, Global Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tew M, Douglas AP, Szer J, Bajel A, Harrison SJ, Tio SY, Worth LJ, Hicks RJ, Ritchie D, Slavin MA, Thursky KA, Dalziel K. Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of [ 18F]FDG-PET/CT for investigation of persistent or recurrent neutropenic fever in high-risk haematology patients. Cancer Imaging 2023; 23:119. [PMID: 38102639 PMCID: PMC10724891 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-023-00647-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A recent randomised trial demonstrated [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography in combination with low-dose CT (FDG-PET/CT), compared to standard of care computed tomography (CT) imaging, positively impacted antimicrobial management and outcomes of acute leukaemia and haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients with persistent and recurrent neutropenic fever. We conducted an economic evaluation from a healthcare perspective alongside the clinical trial. METHODS Unit costs in Australian dollars were applied to all resources used (antimicrobials, diagnostic tests, ICU and hospital bed days). Effectiveness was measured as number of patients with antimicrobial rationalisation, 6-month mortality and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) derived from patient-reported trial-based health-related quality-of-life. Generalised linear models were used to analyse costs and outcomes. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for all outcomes and net monetary benefit (NMB) for QALYs were calculated. We performed bootstrapping with 1000 replications using the recycled predictions method. RESULTS The adjusted healthcare costs were lower for FDG-PET/CT (mean $49,563; 95%CI 36,867, 65,133) compared to CT (mean $57,574; 95% CI 44,837, 73,347). The difference in QALYs between the two groups was small (0.001; 95% CI -0.001, 0.004). When simulated 1000 times, FDG-PET/CT was the dominant strategy as it was cheaper with better outcomes than the standard CT group in 74% of simulations. The estimated NMBs at willingness-to-pay thresholds of $50,000 and $100,000 per QALY were positive, thus FDG-PET/CT remained cost-effective at these thresholds. CONCLUSIONS FDG-PET/CT is cost effective when compared to CT for investigation of persistent/recurrent neutropenic fever in high-risk patients, providing further support for incorporation of FDG-PET/CT into clinical guidelines and funding. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03429387.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Tew
- Health Economics Unit, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Abby P Douglas
- National Centre for Infections in Cancer, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jeff Szer
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Clinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Ashish Bajel
- Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Clinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Simon J Harrison
- National Centre for Infections in Cancer, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Clinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Shio Yen Tio
- National Centre for Infections in Cancer, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Leon J Worth
- National Centre for Infections in Cancer, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Rodney J Hicks
- Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - David Ritchie
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Clinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Monica A Slavin
- National Centre for Infections in Cancer, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Health Services Research and Implementation Science, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Karin A Thursky
- National Centre for Infections in Cancer, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Health Services Research and Implementation Science, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Kim Dalziel
- Health Economics Unit, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Zhu W, Zhang M, Pan J, Shi L, Gao H, Xie S. Valuing Chinese medicine quality of life-11 dimensions (CQ-11D) health states using a discrete choice experiment with survival duration (DCE TTO). Health Qual Life Outcomes 2023; 21:99. [PMID: 37612664 PMCID: PMC10463386 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-023-02180-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore generating a health utility value set for the Chinese medicine Quality of life-11 Dimensions (CQ-11D), a utility instrument designed to assess patients' health status while receiving TCM treatment, among the Chinese population. METHODS The study was designed to recruit at least 2400 respondents across mainland China to complete one-to-one, face-to-face interviews. Respondents completed ten discrete choice experiment with survival duration (DCETTO) tasks during interviews. The conditional logit models were used to generate the health utility value set for the CQ-11D using the DCETTO data. RESULTS A total of 2,586 respondents were invited to participate in the survey and 2498 valid interviews were completed (a completion rate of 96.60%). The modified conditional logit model with combing logically inconsistent levels was ultimately selected to construct the health utility value set for the CQ-11D instrument. The range of the measurable health utility value was -0.868 ~ 1. CONCLUSION The study provides the first utility value set for the CQ-11D among the Chinese population. The CQ-11D and corresponding utility value set can be used to measure the health utility values of patients undergoing traditional Chinese medicine interventions, and further facilitate relevant cost-utility analyses. The application of the CQ-11D can support TCM resource allocation in China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wentao Zhu
- Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Higher Education Zone in LiangXiang Town, FangShan District, Beijing, 102488, China.
| | - Mengpei Zhang
- Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Higher Education Zone in LiangXiang Town, FangShan District, Beijing, 102488, China
| | - Jie Pan
- Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Higher Education Zone in LiangXiang Town, FangShan District, Beijing, 102488, China
| | - Lizheng Shi
- Tulane University, 1440 Canal Street Suite 1900, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA
| | - Hailiang Gao
- Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Higher Education Zone in LiangXiang Town, FangShan District, Beijing, 102488, China
| | - Shitong Xie
- School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lippey J, Keogh L, Campbell I, Mann GB, Forrest LE. Impact of a risk based breast screening decision aid on understanding, acceptance and decision making. NPJ Breast Cancer 2023; 9:65. [PMID: 37553371 PMCID: PMC10409718 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-023-00569-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Internationally, population breast cancer screening is moving towards a risk-stratified approach and requires engagement and acceptance from current and future screening clients. A decision aid ( www.defineau.org ) was developed based on women's views, values, and knowledge regarding risk-stratified breast cancer screening. This study aims to evaluate the impact of the decision aid on women's knowledge, risk perception, acceptance of risk assessment and change of screening frequency, and decision-making. Here we report the results of a pre and post-survey in which women who are clients of BreastScreen Victoria were invited to complete an online questionnaire before and after viewing the decision aid. 3200 potential participants were invited, 242 responded with 127 participants completing both surveys. After reviewing the decision aid there was a significant change in knowledge, acceptance of risk-stratified breast cancer screening and of decreased frequency screening for lower risk. High levels of acceptance of risk stratification, genetic testing and broad support for tailored screening persisted pre and post review. The DEFINE decision aid has a positive impact on acceptance of lower frequency screening, a major barrier to the success of a risk-stratified program and may contribute to facilitating change to the population breast screening program in Australia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jocelyn Lippey
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Melbourne, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Department of Surgery, Melbourne, Australia
- St. Vincent's Hospital, Department of Surgery, Fitzroy, Australia
| | - Louise Keogh
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ian Campbell
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Gregory Bruce Mann
- Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Breast Service, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Laura Elenor Forrest
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mukuria C, Peasgood T, McDool E, Norman R, Rowen D, Brazier J. Valuing the EQ Health and Wellbeing Short Using Time Trade-Off and a Discrete Choice Experiment: A Feasibility Study. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2023; 26:1073-1084. [PMID: 36805577 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Revised: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The EQ Health and Wellbeing Short (EQ-HWB-S) is a new generic measure that covers health and wellbeing developed for use in economic evaluation in health and social care. The aim was to test the feasibility of using composite time trade-off (cTTO) and a discrete choice experiment (DCE) based on an international protocol to derive utilities for the EQ-HWB-S and to generate a pilot value set. METHODS A representative UK general population was recruited. Online videoconference interviews were undertaken where cTTO and DCE tasks were administered using EuroQol Portable Valuation Technology. Quality control (QC) was used to assess interviewers' performance. Data were modeled using Tobit, probit, and hybrid models. Feasibility was assessed based on the distribution of data, participants, and reports of understanding from the interviewer, QC and modeling results. RESULTS cTTO and DCE data were available for 520 participants. Demographic characteristics were broadly representative of the UK general population. Interviewers met QC requirements. cTTO values ranged between -1 to 1 with increasing disutility associated with more severe states. Participants understood the tasks and the EQ-HWB-S states; and the interviewers reported high levels of understanding and engagement. The hybrid Tobit heteroscedastic model was selected for the pilot value set with values ranging from -0.384 to 1. Pain, mobility, daily activities, and sad/depressed had the largest disutilities, followed by loneliness, anxiety, exhaustion, control, and cognition in the selected model. CONCLUSIONS EQ-HWB-S can be valued using cTTO and DCE. Further methodological work is recommended to develop a valuation protocol specific to the EQ-HWB-S.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Mukuria
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK.
| | - Tessa Peasgood
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Emily McDool
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - Richard Norman
- Curtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Donna Rowen
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - John Brazier
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Swan JS, Langer MM. Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Measurement Invariance of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lung Cancer Utility Index (FACT-LUI). MDM Policy Pract 2023; 8:23814683231186992. [PMID: 37529767 PMCID: PMC10388633 DOI: 10.1177/23814683231186992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background. A portion of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) instrument contributed to a previously published utility index, the FACT Lung Utility Index or FACT-LUI. Six FACT items representing lung cancer quality of life covered fatigue, pain, dyspnea, cough, anxiety, and depression. Two FACT items had been previously combined by the index authors into one for nausea and/or appetite loss, resulting in 7 final domains. Methods. The objective was to perform measurement invariance testing within a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) framework to support the feasibility of using the FACT-LUI for non-preference-based psychometric applications. The original index patients comprised group 1, and similar FACT patient data (n = 249) from another published study comprised group 2. One 2-factor model and two 1-factor CFA models were evaluated to assess measurement invariance across groups, using varying degrees of item parceling and a small number of residual covariances, all justified by the literature. Results. The 1-factor models were most optimal. A 1-factor model with 1 pair of items parceled showed invariance to the partial scalar level using usual fit criteria across groups, requiring 2 unconstrained intercepts. A 1-factor model with 3 pairs of justified parcels showed full configural, metric, and scalar invariance across groups. Conclusions. The FACT-LUI items fit a partially to fully invariant 1-factor model, suggesting feasibility for non-preference-based applications. Implications. Results suggest useful incorporation of the FACT-LUI into clinical trials with no substantial increased respondent burden, allowing preference-based and other psychometric applications from the same index items. Highlights This work suggests that in addition to being originally designed for use as a utility index, the 7 FACT-LUI items together also fit simple CFA and measurement invariance models. This less expected result indicates that these items as a group are also potentially useful in non-preference-based applications.Clinical trials can make for challenging decisions concerning which patient-reported outcome measures to include without being burdensome. However, the literature suggests a need for improved reporting of quality of life in lung cancer in particular as well as cancer in general. Inclusion of more disease-specific items such as the FACT-LUI may allow for information gathering of both preference-based and non-preference-based data with less demand on patients, similar to what has been done with some generic instruments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Shannon Swan
- Massachusetts General Hospital Institute for Technology Assessment, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michelle M. Langer
- Northwestern University, Feinburg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wang H, Rowen DL, Brazier JE, Jiang L. Discrete Choice Experiments in Health State Valuation: A Systematic Review of Progress and New Trends. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2023; 21:405-418. [PMID: 36997744 PMCID: PMC10062300 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-023-00794-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are increasingly used in health state valuation studies. OBJECTIVE This systematic review updates the progress and new findings of DCE studies in the health state valuation, covering the period since the review of June 2018 to November 2022. The review reports the methods that are currently being used in DCE studies to value health and study design characteristics, and, for the first time, reviews DCE health state valuation studies published in the Chinese language. METHODS English language databases PubMed and Cochrane, and Chinese language databases Wanfang and CNKI were searched using the self-developed search terms. Health state valuation or methodology study papers were included if the study used DCE data to generate a value set for a preference-based measure. Key information extracted included DCE study design strategies applied, methods for anchoring the latent coefficient on to a 0-1 QALY scale and data analysis methods. RESULTS Sixty-five studies were included; one Chinese language publication and 64 English language publications. The number of health state valuation studies using DCE has rapidly increased in recent years and these have been conducted in more countries than prior to 2018. Wide usage of DCE with duration attributes, D-efficient design and models accounting for heterogeneity has continued in recent years. Although more methodological consensus has been found than in studies conducted prior to 2018, this consensus may be driven by valuation studies for common measures with an international protocol (the 'model' valuation research). Valuing long measures with well-being attributes attracted attention and more realistic design strategies (e.g., inconstant time preference, efficient design and implausible states design) were identified. However, more qualitative and quantitative methodology study is still necessary to evaluate the effect of those new methods. CONCLUSIONS The use of DCEs in health state valuation continues to grow dramatically and the methodology progress makes the method more reliable and pragmatic. However, study design is driven by international protocols and method selection is not always justified. There is no gold standard for DCE design, presentation format or anchoring method. More qualitative and quantitative methodology study is recommended to evaluate the effect of new methods before researchers make methodology decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haode Wang
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, 30 Regent St, Sheffield City Centre, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
| | - Donna L Rowen
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, 30 Regent St, Sheffield City Centre, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - John E Brazier
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, 30 Regent St, Sheffield City Centre, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Litian Jiang
- Health Policy Research Unit, Shenzhen Health Development Research and Data Management Center, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Pilz MJ, Nolte S, Liegl G, King M, Norman R, McTaggart-Cowan H, Bottomley A, Rose M, Kemmler G, Holzner B, Gamper EM. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Utility-Core 10 Dimensions: Development and Investigation of General Population Utility Norms for Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and the United Kingdom. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2023; 26:760-767. [PMID: 36572102 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Revised: 12/11/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Utility-Core 10 Dimensions (EORTC QLU-C10D) is a cancer-specific preference-based measure, providing health utilities for use in economic evaluations derived from the widely used health-related quality of life measure, EORTC QLQ-C30. Several EORTC QLU-C10D country-specific value sets are available. This article aimed to provide EORTC QLU-C10D general population utility norms for Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and the United Kingdom, to aid interpretability of obtained utilities in these countries. METHODS Data were collected in aforementioned countries via a quota-sampled, cross-sectional online survey (n = 100/age-sex group; N = approximately 1000/country). Participants were asked to complete the EORTC QLQ-C30 and provide sociodemographic data. Country-specific utility norms were calculated using the respective country tariff on the country's EORTC QLQ-C30 data after weighting to achieve population representativeness for age and sex. Norm values are provided as means (SDs) by country, age, and sex groups. Tukey's multiple comparison test investigated mean differences among countries. The impact of country, age, and sex on utility values was investigated with a multiple linear regression model. RESULTS Country-specific mean utilities range from 0.724 (United Kingdom) to 0.843 (Italy). Country-, sex-, and age-specific mean utilities range from 0.664 for 30- to 39-year-old male Canadians to 0.899 for > 70-year-old male Italians. Utilities were lower in females in 4 of 6 countries, and the impact of age differed among countries. Independent of the impact of age and sex, between-country differences were found (P ≤ .05). CONCLUSION Results showed a varying impact of age and sex on EORTC QLU-C10D utilities and significant between-country differences. Using national utility norms and utility decrements is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Micha Johannes Pilz
- University Hospital of Innsbruck Psychiatry II, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Sandra Nolte
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Gregor Liegl
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Madeleine King
- School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Richard Norman
- School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
| | | | - Andrew Bottomley
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Matthias Rose
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Georg Kemmler
- Division of Psychiatry I, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Bernhard Holzner
- University Hospital of Innsbruck Psychiatry II, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria; Division of Psychiatry I, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Eva Maria Gamper
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
McCaffrey N, Cheah SL, Luckett T, Phillips JL, Agar M, Davidson PM, Boyle F, Shaw T, Currow DC, Lovell M. Treatment patterns and out-of-hospital healthcare resource utilisation by patients with advanced cancer living with pain: An analysis from the Stop Cancer PAIN trial. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0282465. [PMID: 36854021 PMCID: PMC9974128 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND About 70% of patients with advanced cancer experience pain. Few studies have investigated the use of healthcare in this population and the relationship between pain intensity and costs. METHODS Adults with advanced cancer and scored worst pain ≥ 2/10 on a numeric rating scale (NRS) were recruited from 6 Australian oncology/palliative care outpatient services to the Stop Cancer PAIN trial (08/15-06/19). Out-of-hospital, publicly funded services, prescriptions and costs were estimated for the three months before pain screening. Descriptive statistics summarize the clinico-demographic variables, health services and costs, treatments and pain scores. Relationships with costs were explored using Spearman correlations, Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests, and a gamma log-link generalized linear model. RESULTS Overall, 212 participants had median worst pain scores of five (inter-quartile range 4). The most frequently prescribed medications were opioids (60.1%) and peptic ulcer/gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) drugs (51.6%). The total average healthcare cost in the three months before the census date was A$6,742 (95% CI $5,637, $7,847), approximately $27,000 annually. Men had higher mean healthcare costs than women, adjusting for age, cancer type and pain levels (men $7,872, women $4,493, p<0.01) and higher expenditure on prescriptions (men $5,559, women $2,034, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS In this population with pain and cancer, there was no clear relationship between healthcare costs and pain severity. These treatment patterns requiring further exploration including the prevalence of peptic ulcer/GORD drugs, and lipid lowering agents and the higher healthcare costs for men. TRIAL REGISTRATION ACTRN12615000064505. World Health Organisation unique trial number U1111-1164-4649. Registered 23 January 2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikki McCaffrey
- Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood Campus, Burwood, VIC, Australia
- * E-mail:
| | - Seong Leang Cheah
- Faculty of Health, IMPACCT (Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation Sydney), University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Tim Luckett
- Faculty of Health, IMPACCT (Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation Sydney), University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jane L. Phillips
- Faculty of Health, IMPACCT (Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation Sydney), University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Health, School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove Brisbane, Queensland
| | - Meera Agar
- Faculty of Health, IMPACCT (Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation Sydney), University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Patricia M. Davidson
- Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Frances Boyle
- Patricia Ritchie Centre for Cancer Care and Research, Mater Hospital North Sydney, and University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Tim Shaw
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - David C. Currow
- Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Melanie Lovell
- Department of Palliative Care, HammondCare, Greenwich Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Measuring the Wellbeing of Cancer Patients with Generic and Disease-Specific Instruments. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15041351. [PMID: 36831692 PMCID: PMC9954597 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15041351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Different wellbeing measures have been used among cancer patients. This study aimed to first investigate the sensitivity of health state utility (HSU), capability, and subjective wellbeing (SWB) instruments in cancer. A cancer-specific instrument (QLQ-C30) was included and transferred onto the cancer-specific HSU scores. Furthermore, it examined the relative importance of key life domains explaining overall life satisfaction. Data were drawn from the Multi-instrument Comparison survey. Linear regression was used to explore the extent to which the QLQ-C30 sub-scales explain HSU and SWB. Kernel-based Regularized Least Squares (KRLS), a machine learning method, was used to explore the life domain importance of cancer patients. As expected, the QLQ-C30 sub-scales explained the vast majority of the variance in its derived cancer-specific HSU (R2 = 0.96), followed by generic HSU instruments (R2 of 0.65-0.73) and SWB and capability instruments (R2 of 0.33-0.48). The cancer-specific measure was more closely correlated with generic HSU than SWB measures, owing to the construction of these instruments. In addition to health, life achievements, relationships, the standard of living, and future security all play an important role in explaining the overall life satisfaction of cancer patients.
Collapse
|
21
|
Developing an Australian utility value set for MacNew-7D health states. Qual Life Res 2022; 32:1151-1163. [PMID: 36542299 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-022-03325-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A new preference-based measure (MacNew-7D) has recently been developed to allow condition-specific data to be used to capture the quality of life in health economic evaluations in cardiology; however, a general population value set has not yet been developed. This study developed a population utility value set for the MacNew-7D heart disease-specific instrument. METHODS The discrete choice experiments (DCE) technique was chosen as the preference-elicitation method. The DCE asked respondents to compare two options and to state their preferences. The survey was conducted using an online panel of respondents, with quota sampling using age groups, sex and jurisdictions to achieve representativeness of the Australian population. The total design consisted of 200 choice sets, of which each respondent answered eight. Additionally, each respondent answered two quality control choice sets. The best-fitting models were selected on the basis of consistency, parsimony, and goodness of fit. RESULTS In total, 1903 respondents were included in the analyses. The MacNew-7D utility value set ranged from -0.4456 to 1.000 for health states defined by the classification system. The best-fitting model retained all levels for five dimensions and collapsed one adjacent level for the other two dimensions. Findings were robust to sensitivity analyses related to the inclusion or exclusion of dominancy and repeat tasks. CONCLUSION Findings indicated that the MacNew-7D utility value set is likely suitable for estimating quality-adjusted life years derived from the MacNew heart disease health-related quality-of-life questionnaire. This value set was derived from an Australian population-based sample and may not be generalisable to dissimilar populations.
Collapse
|
22
|
Wu X, Qin F, Zhang Q, Qiao J, Qi Y, Liu B. Immunotherapy improved cancer related pain management in patients with advanced Hepato-Pancreatic Biliary Cancers: A propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis. Front Oncol 2022; 12:914591. [PMID: 36212482 PMCID: PMC9533141 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.914591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundHepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) cancer is a serious form of cancer. in many HPB cancers, including cholangiocarcinoma (also known as bile duct cancer), pancreatic cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, gallbladder cancer and ampullary cancer, although several treatment options are developed during these decades, the prognosis is still poor.MethodsA total of 356 HPB cancers patients in advanced stage received different kinds of treatments including adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy. Among these patients with advanced HPB cancers, 135 patients have received standard opioid treatment for pain controlling.ResultsWe performed a PSM analysis to minimize differences between groups. Before PSM, 135 patients received standard opioid treatment for pain controlling were enrolled in this study and divided into 4 groups, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy. Relevant clinical variables that were available at the time of initial diagnosis were used for 1:1 matching between the two groups. After PSM, the cohort consisted of 18 patients in each group. Prior to PSM, patients received targeted therapy and immunotherapy exhibited shorter median OSs than their counterparts for patients received chemotherapy and radiotherapy (p<0.001). there were so survival differences among all the four different treatments for these patients with HPB cancers (p>0.05). We found the OMED (mg) q/day and NRS scores decreased significantly when patients received immunotherapy treatment. Fewer adverse events were showed between immunotherapy group and other three treatment groups, which was consistent with our previous reports.ConclusionIn conclusion, we found that given the same survival benefit, immunotherapy reduced opioid consumption in HPB cancers patients and improved the pain management. Moreover, immunotherapy results in fewer other adverse effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiufang Wu
- Department of Pain, Jinan People’s Hospital, Jinan, China
| | - Fei Qin
- Department of Pain, Jinan People’s Hospital, Jinan, China
| | - Qiangze Zhang
- Department of Pain, Jinan People’s Hospital, Jinan, China
| | - Jianling Qiao
- Department of Medical Oncology, Jinan Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Jinan, China
| | - Yulian Qi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Jinan People’s Hospital, Jinan, China
| | - Bing Liu
- Department of Disease Control and Prevention, Rocket Force Characteristic Medical Center, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Bing Liu,
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kong BY, Sim HW, Barnes EH, Nowak AK, Hovey EJ, Jeffree R, Harrup R, Parkinson J, Gan HK, Pinkham MB, Yip S, Hall M, Tu E, Carter C, Koh ES, Lwin Z, Dowling A, Simes JS, Gedye C. Multi-Arm GlioblastoMa Australasia (MAGMA): protocol for a multiarm randomised clinical trial for people affected by glioblastoma. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e058107. [PMID: 36104135 PMCID: PMC10441685 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant primary central nervous system cancer in adults. The objective of the Multi-Arm GlioblastoMa Australasia (MAGMA) trial is to test hypotheses in real world setting to improve survival of people with GBM. Initial experimental arms are evaluating the effectiveness of interventions in newly diagnosed GBM (ndGBM). This study will compare maximal surgical resection followed by chemoradiotherapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy for 6 months with the addition of (1) 'neoadjuvant' chemotherapy beginning as soon as possible after surgery and/or (2) adjuvant chemotherapy continued until progression within the same study platform. METHODS AND ANALYSIS MAGMA will establish a platform for open-label, multiarm, multicentre randomised controlled testing of treatments for GBM. The study began recruiting in September 2020 and recruitment to the initial two interventions in MAGMA is expected to continue until September 2023.Adults aged ≥18 years with ndGBM will be given the option of undergoing randomisation to each study intervention separately, thereby giving rise to a partial factorial design, with two separate randomisation time points, one for neoadjuvant therapy and one for extended therapy. Patients will have the option of being randomised at each time point or continuing on with standard treatment.The primary outcome for the study is overall survival from the date of initial surgery until death from any cause. Secondary outcomes include progression-free survival, time to first non-temozolomide treatment, overall survival from each treatment randomisation, clinically significant toxicity as measured by grade 3 or 4 adverse events and health-related quality-of-life measures. Tertiary outcomes are predictive/prognostic biomarkers and health utilities and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.The primary analysis of overall survival will be performed separately for each study intervention according to the intention to treat principle on all patients randomised to each study intervention. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study (Protocol version 2.0 dated 23 November 2020) was approved by a lead Human Research Ethics Committee (Sydney Local Health District: 2019/ETH13297). The study will be conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ACTRN12620000048987.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Y Kong
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Hao-Wen Sim
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- St Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Anna K Nowak
- Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Perth, Australia
| | - Elizabeth J Hovey
- Department of Medical Oncology, Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rosalind Jeffree
- Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Rosemary Harrup
- Cancer and Blood Services, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Jonathon Parkinson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Hui K Gan
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - Mark B Pinkham
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
- School of Clinical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Sonia Yip
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Merryn Hall
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Emily Tu
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Candace Carter
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Eng-Siew Koh
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Radiation Oncology, Liverpool Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
- Collaboration for Cancer Outcomes, Research and Evaluation, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
| | - Zarnie Lwin
- Cancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Anthony Dowling
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne Pty Ltd, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
| | - John S Simes
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Craig Gedye
- Department of Medical Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, New South Wales, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Pan CW, He JY, Zhu YB, Zhao CH, Luo N, Wang P. Comparison of EQ-5D-5L and EORTC QLU-C10D utilities in gastric cancer patients. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2022:10.1007/s10198-022-01523-0. [PMID: 36083356 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-022-01523-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To compare measurement properties of the utility scores derived from various country-specific value sets of EQ-5D-5L (5L) and EORTC QLU-C10D (10D) in gastric cancer patient. METHODS The study used cross-sectional data of 243 Chinese gastric cancer patients who completed both 5L and EORTC QLQ-C30. Utility score of QLU-C10D is generated from all the available QLU-C10D value sets currently; the score of 5L is derived from the corresponding 5L value sets for the countries with both the 5L and QLU-C10D value sets and the Chinese 5L value set. Convergent validity was evaluated by testing their correlations with the VAS score. Known-group validity was assessed by comparing the utility scores the patients with different severities. Their relative efficiency (RE) was also compared. RESULTS Correlation coefficient of 5L and QLU-C10D utility scores with VAS ranged from 0.54 to 0.59, and 0.55 to 0.63, respectively. Both the utility scores were in general able to discriminate the patients with different severities; and 5L utility score had higher RE in the majority of known-groups. CONCLUSION EQ-5D-5L and QLU-C10D utility scores were different and, thus, non-swappable. They possess similar convergent validity and known-group validity; while EQ-5D-5L scores may have better discriminative power.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen-Wei Pan
- School of Public Health, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Jun-Yi He
- School of Public Health, Fudan University, 130 Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Key Lab of Health Technology Assessment, National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China (Fudan University), Shanghai, China
| | - Yan-Bo Zhu
- Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Chun-Hua Zhao
- Medical Education and Training Department, Gusu School, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical UniversitySuzhou Municipal HospitalNanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China
| | - Nan Luo
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Pei Wang
- School of Public Health, Fudan University, 130 Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- Key Lab of Health Technology Assessment, National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China (Fudan University), Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Rowen D, Mukuria C, McDool E. A Systematic Review of the Methodologies and Modelling Approaches Used to Generate International EQ-5D-5L Value Sets. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2022; 40:863-882. [PMID: 35829931 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-022-01159-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/15/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The international protocol for valuing EQ-5D-5L focuses upon prescribed preference elicitation methods and design. However, there are no recommendations around sampling, recruitment, data analysis or modelling to generate the EQ-5D-5L value set. This review examines methods used to generate international EQ-5D-5L values sets, across sampling, recruitment, data analysis, modelling, assessing model performance and selection of the recommended value set. METHODS All published EQ-5D-5L value sets were identified by a systematic search and confirmed by the EuroQol Group. Data were extracted to assess sampling, recruitment, preference elicitation techniques and design, data analysis, modelling, assessing model performance, and vale set selection. These are summarised in tables. RESULTS The review included 29 studies with 27 value sets generated using time-trade-off (TTO) data (n = 10) only or using a hybrid model that combines TTO and discrete choice experiment data (n = 17). TTO data were most commonly estimated using a heteroscedastic Tobit model with censoring at - 1, and the hybrid model using a specially created program. Model performance was generally assessed using goodness of fit, logical consistency and significance of coefficients, suitability of the model for the data characteristics and parsimony, though not all selected models account for the specific characteristics of the data. DISCUSSION Different assessments of model performance and reasoning are provided for the selection of the recommended value set for a country. This raises the question of valid criteria for selecting a recommended value set and whether this should rely upon researchers' recommendations when value sets are often used to inform public policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donna Rowen
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
| | - Clara Mukuria
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Emily McDool
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Soo WK, King MT, Pope A, Parente P, Dārziņš P, Davis ID. Integrated Geriatric Assessment and Treatment Effectiveness (INTEGERATE) in older people with cancer starting systemic anticancer treatment in Australia: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. THE LANCET. HEALTHY LONGEVITY 2022; 3:e617-e627. [PMID: 36102776 DOI: 10.1016/s2666-7568(22)00169-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Revised: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effectiveness of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in improving health outcomes in cancer settings is unclear. We evaluated whether CGA can improve health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in older people with cancer who are starting systemic anticancer treatment. METHODS INTEGERATE is a multicentre, open-label, pragmatic, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial that was done at three hospitals in Australia. Participants aged 70 years and older with solid cancer or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma planned for chemotherapy, targeted therapy, or immunotherapy, were randomly assigned (1:1; using a central computer-generated minimisation algorithm with a random element, balancing treatment intent, cancer type, age, sex, and performance status) to receive CGA integrated into oncology care (integrated oncogeriatric care) or usual care only. Group assignment was not concealed from the participants and clinicians. The primary outcome was HRQOL over 24 weeks, assessed at baseline, week 12, week 18, and week 24, using the Elderly Functional Index (ELFI; score range 0-100). Analyses were by intention to treat. The trial is registered with ANZCTR.org.au, ACTRN12614000399695, and is completed. FINDINGS Between Aug 18, 2014, and Sept 5, 2018, 154 participants were randomly assigned to integrated oncogeriatric care (n=76) or usual care (n=78). 13 participants died by week 12 and 130 (92%) of the remaining 141 participants completed two or more ELFI assessments. Participants assigned to integrated oncogeriatric care reported better adjusted ELFI change scores over 24 weeks compared with those in the usual care group (overall main effect of group: t=2·1, df=213, p=0·039; effect size=0·38), with maximal between-group differences at week 18 (mean difference in change 9·8 [95% CI 2·4-17·2]; p=0·010, corrected p=0·030, effect size=0·48). The integrated oncogeriatric care group also had significantly fewer unplanned hospital admissions at 24 weeks (multivariable-adjusted incidence rate ratio 0·60 [95% CI 0·42-0·87]; p=0·0066). No statistically significant between-group difference was observed in overall survival. INTERPRETATION CGA led to better quality of life and health-care delivery in older people receiving systemic anticancer treatment. Routine CGA-based interventions should be considered in at-risk older people starting systemic anticancer treatment. FUNDING National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia), Monash University, and Eastern Health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wee Kheng Soo
- Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Box Hill, VIC, Australia; Cancer Services, Eastern Health, Box Hill, VIC, Australia; Aged Medicine Program, Eastern Health, Box Hill, VIC, Australia.
| | - Madeleine T King
- School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Alun Pope
- Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Box Hill, VIC, Australia
| | - Phillip Parente
- Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Box Hill, VIC, Australia; Cancer Services, Eastern Health, Box Hill, VIC, Australia
| | - Pēteris Dārziņš
- Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Box Hill, VIC, Australia; Aged Medicine Program, Eastern Health, Box Hill, VIC, Australia
| | - Ian D Davis
- Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Box Hill, VIC, Australia; Cancer Services, Eastern Health, Box Hill, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Quality of life in terminally ill cancer patients: what is the role of using complementary and alternative medicines? Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:9421-9432. [PMID: 35915340 PMCID: PMC9342945 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07301-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Cancer is the world's second greatest cause of mortality and a leading cause of death in both developed and developing countries. Patients employ a number of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) methods to deal with the problems and difficulties of cancer, which can have an impact on their quality of life (QOL). The aim of the present study was to assess the correlation between QOL and the use of different CAM methods in terminally ill cancer patients. METHODS This was a cross-sectional study. In southern Iran, 238 individuals with advanced cancer were studied in oncology centers and doctors' offices. During the months of January to August 2021, patients were selected using convenience sampling. A demographic information questionnaire, the EORTC core quality of life questionnaire, and the CAM questionnaire were used to collect data. RESULTS The results showed that terminally ill cancer patients had a good quality of life. Last year, 85.7% of participants used at least one kind of CAM. Furthermore, 45.4% of participants used only one form of CAM, 30.3% used two types of CAM, 6.7% used three types of CAM, and 3.4% used four to five types of CAM. When all CAM users were compared to non-CAM users, CAM users had significantly higher social QOL and overall quality of life. Two subscales of QOL symptoms and function were correlated with cancer history, income, and use of CAMs, and the scores of QOL symptoms and function were greater in CAM users compared to non-CAM users. Among all the study variables, only the usage of CAM was correlated to overall QOL among terminally ill cancer patients. CONCLUSION The current study found that using CAM could affect different aspects of QOL in terminally ill cancer patients. As a result, it is feasible that using CAM could help these people enhance their health and QOL.
Collapse
|
28
|
Dennett AM, Harding KE, Peiris CL, Shields N, Barton C, Lynch L, Parente P, Lim D, Taylor NF. Efficacy of Group Exercise-Based Cancer Rehabilitation Delivered via Telehealth (TeleCaRe): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2022; 11:e38553. [PMID: 35849441 PMCID: PMC9345024 DOI: 10.2196/38553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Revised: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Access to rehabilitation to support cancer survivors to exercise is poor. Group exercise–based rehabilitation may be delivered remotely, but no trials have currently evaluated their efficacy. Objective We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a group exercise–based cancer rehabilitation program delivered via telehealth compared to usual care for improving the quality of life of cancer survivors. Methods A parallel, assessor-blinded, pragmatic randomized controlled trial with embedded cost and qualitative analysis will be completed. In total, 116 cancer survivors will be recruited from a metropolitan health network in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. The experimental group will attend an 8-week, twice-weekly, 60-minute exercise group session supervised via videoconferencing supplemented by a web-based home exercise program and information portal. The comparison group will receive usual care including standardized exercise advice and written information. Assessments will be completed at weeks 0 (baseline), 9 (post intervention), and 26 (follow-up). The primary outcome will be health-related quality of life measured using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire at week 9. Secondary measures include walking capacity (6-minute walk test), physical activity (activPAL accelerometer), self-efficacy (Health Action Process Approach Questionnaire), and adverse events. Health service data including hospital length of stay, hospital readmissions, and emergency department presentations will be recorded. Semistructured interviews will be completed within an interpretive description framework to explore the patient experience. The primary outcome will be analyzed using linear mixed effects models. A cost-effectiveness analysis will also be performed. Results The trial commenced in April 2022. As of June 2022, we enrolled 14 participants. Conclusions This trial will inform the future implementation of cancer rehabilitation by providing important data about efficacy, safety, cost, and patient experience. Trial Registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12621001417875; https://tinyurl.com/yc5crwtr International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/38553
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy M Dennett
- Allied Health Clinical Research Office, Eastern Health, Box Hill, Australia.,School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia
| | - Katherine E Harding
- Allied Health Clinical Research Office, Eastern Health, Box Hill, Australia.,School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia
| | - Casey L Peiris
- School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia
| | - Nora Shields
- School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia
| | - Christian Barton
- School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia
| | - Lauren Lynch
- Community Health, Eastern Health, Healesville, Australia
| | - Phillip Parente
- Department of Cancer Services, Eastern Health, Box Hill, Australia.,Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - David Lim
- School of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, Australia
| | - Nicholas F Taylor
- Allied Health Clinical Research Office, Eastern Health, Box Hill, Australia.,School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
McTaggart-Cowan H, King MT, Norman R, Costa DSJ, Pickard AS, Viney R, Peacock SJ. The FACT-8D, a new cancer-specific utility algorithm based on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapies-General (FACT-G): a Canadian valuation study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2022; 20:97. [PMID: 35710417 PMCID: PMC9205108 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-022-02002-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Utility instruments are used to assess patients’ health-related quality of life for cost-utility analysis (CUA). However, for cancer patients, the dimensions of generic utility instruments may not capture all the information relevant to the impact of cancer. Cancer-specific utilities provide a useful alternative. Under the auspices of the Multi-Attribute Utility in Cancer Consortium, a cancer-specific utility algorithm was derived from the FACT-G. The new FACT-8D contains eight dimensions: pain, fatigue, nausea, sleep, work, support from family/friends, sadness, and worry health will get worse. The aim of the study was to obtain a Canadian value set for the FACT-8D.
Methods A discrete choice experiment was administered to a Canadian general population online panel, quota sampled by age, sex, and province/territory of residence. Respondents provided responses to 16 choice sets. Each choice set consisted of two health states described by the FACT-8D dimensions plus an attribute representing survival duration. Sample weights were applied and the responses were analyzed using conditional logistic regression, parameterized to fit the quality-adjusted life year framework. The results were converted into utility weights by evaluating the marginal rate of substitution between each level of each FACT-8D dimension with respect to duration.
Results 2228 individuals were recruited. The analysis dataset included n = 1582 individuals, who completed at least one choice set; of which, n = 1501 completed all choice sets. After constraining to ensure monotonicity in the utility function, the largest decrements were for the highest levels of pain (− 0.38), nausea (− 0.30), and problems doing work (− 0.23). The decrements of the remaining dimensions ranged from − 0.08 to − 0.18 for their highest levels. The utility of the worst possible health state was defined as − 0.65, considerably worse than dead.
Conclusions The largest impacts on utility included three generic dimensions (i.e., pain, support, and work) and nausea, a symptom caused by cancer (e.g., brain tumours, gastrointestinal tumours, malignant bowel obstruction) and by common treatments (e.g., chemotherapy, radiotherapy, opioid analgesics). This may make the FACT-8D more informative for CUA evaluating in many cancer contexts, an assertion that must now be tested empirically in head-to-head comparisons with generic utility measures. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12955-022-02002-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen McTaggart-Cowan
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, 675 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, Canada. .,Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
| | | | - Richard Norman
- School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| | - Daniel S J Costa
- School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Pain Management Research Institute, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - A Simon Pickard
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes, and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, USA
| | - Rosalie Viney
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia
| | - Stuart J Peacock
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, 675 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, Canada.,Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Xie S, Wu J, Chen G. Discrete choice experiment with duration versus time trade-off: a comparison of test-retest reliability of health utility elicitation approaches in SF-6Dv2 valuation. Qual Life Res 2022; 31:2791-2803. [PMID: 35610406 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-022-03159-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate and compare the test-retest reliability of discrete choice experiments with duration (DCETTO) and time trade-off (TTO) in the Chinese SF-6Dv2 valuation study. METHODS During face-to-face interviews, a representative sample of the Chinese general population completed 8 TTO tasks and 10 DCETTO tasks. Retest interviews were conducted after two weeks. For both DCETTO and TTO, the consistency of raw responses between the two tests was firstly evaluated at the individual level. Regressions were conducted to investigate the association between the test-retest reliability and the respondents' characteristics and the severity of health states. Consistency was then analyzed at the aggregate level by comparing the rank order of the coefficients of dimensions. RESULTS In total, 162 respondents (51.9% male; range 18-80 years) completed the two tests. The intraclass correlations coefficient 0.958 for TTO, with identical values accounting for 59.3% of observations. 76.4% of choices were identical for DCETTO, with a Kappa statistic of 0.528. Respondents' characteristics had no significant impact while the severity of health states valued in TTO and DCETTO tasks had a significant impact on the test-retest reliability. Both approaches produced relatively stable rank order of dimensions in constrained model estimations between test and retest data. CONCLUSIONS Individual responses of both approaches are relatively stable over time. The rank orders of dimensions in model estimations between test and retest for TTO and DCETTO are also consistent. The differences of utility estimation between the two tests for DCETTO need to be further investigated based on a larger sample size.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shitong Xie
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| | - Jing Wu
- School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China. .,Center for Social Science Survey and Data, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
| | - Gang Chen
- Monash Business School, Centre for Health Economics, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Gamper EM, King MT, Norman R, Loth FLC, Holzner B, Kemmler G. The EORTC QLU-C10D discrete choice experiment for cancer patients: a first step towards patient utility weights. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2022; 6:42. [PMID: 35507194 PMCID: PMC9068836 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-022-00430-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Utility-Core 10 Dimensions (QLU-C10D) is a novel cancer-specific preference-based measure (PBM) for which value sets are being developed for an increasing number of countries. This is done by obtaining health preferences from the respective general population. There is an ongoing discussion if instead patients suffering from the disease in question should be asked for their preferences. We used the QLU-C10D valuation survey, originally designed for use in the general population, in a sample of cancer patients in Austria to assess the methodology’s acceptability and applicability in this target group before obtaining QLU-C10D patient preferences. Methods The core of the QLU-C10D valuation survey is a discrete choice experiment in which respondents are asked to give preferences for certain health states (described by a relatively large number of 10 quality of life domains) and an associated survival time. They therewith are asked to trade off quality of life against life time. As this might be a very burdensome task for cancer patients undergoing treatment, a cognitive interview was conducted in a pilot sample to assess burden and potential additional needs for explanation in order to be able to use the DCE for the development of QLU-C10D patient preferences. In addition, responses to general feedback questions on the survey were compared against responses from a matched control group from the already completed Austrian general population valuation survey. Results We included 48 patients (mean age 59.9 years; 46% female). In the cognitive interview, the majority indicated that their experience with the survey was positive (85%) and overall clarity as good (90%). In response to the general feedback questions, patients rated the presentation of the health states less clear than matched controls (p = 0.008). There was no difference between patients and the general population concerning the difficulty in choosing between the health states (p = 0.344). Conclusion Despite the relatively large number of DCE domains the survey was manageable for patients and allows going on with the QLU-C10D patient valuation study. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-022-00430-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva-Maria Gamper
- Innsbruck Institute of Patient-Centered Outcome Research (IIPCOR), Dr. Stumpf Straße 47, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - Madeleine T King
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Richard Norman
- School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| | - Fanny L C Loth
- Faculty of Philosophy and Education, Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Eichtstätt, Germany
| | - Bernhard Holzner
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.,Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychiatry I, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Georg Kemmler
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychiatry I, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Vatandoust S, Wattchow D, Sposato L, Michael MZ, Leung J, Gormly K, Chen G, Symonds EL, Tie J, Papanicolas LE, Woods S, Gebski V, Mead K, Kuruni A, Karapetis CS. A longitudinal cohort study of watch and wait in complete clinical responders after chemo-radiotherapy for localised rectal cancer: study protocol. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:222. [PMID: 35232427 PMCID: PMC8887187 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09304-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Rectal Cancer is a common malignancy. The current treatment approach for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer involves neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical resection of the rectum. The resection can lead to complications and long-term consequences. A clinical complete response is observed in some patients after chemoradiotherapy. A number of recent studies have shown that patients can be observed safely after completing chemoradiotherapy (without surgery), provided clinical complete response has been achieved. In this approach, resection is reserved for cases of regrowth. This is called the watch and wait approach. This approach potentially avoids unnecessary surgical resection of the rectum and the resulting complications. In this study, we will prospectively investigate this approach. Methods Adult patients with a diagnosis of rectal cancer planned to receive neoadjuvant long course chemoradiotherapy (± subsequent combination chemotherapy) will be consented into the study prior to commencing treatment. After completing the chemoradiotherapy (± subsequent combination chemotherapy), based on the clinical response, subjects will be allocated to one of the following arms: subjects who achieved a clinical complete response will be allocated to the watch and wait arm and others to the standard management arm (which includes resection). The aim of the study is to determine the rate of local failure and other safety and efficacy outcomes in the watch and wait arm. Patient reported outcome measures and the use of biomarkers as part of the clinical monitoring will be studied in both arms of the study. Discussion This study will prospectively investigate the safety of the watch and wait approach. We will investigate predictive biomarkers (molecular biomarkers and imaging biomarkers) and patient reported outcome measures in the study population and the cost effectiveness of the watch and wait approach. This study will also help evaluate a defined monitoring schedule for patients managed with the watch and wait approach. This protocol covers the first two years of follow up, we are planning a subsequent study which covers year 3–5 follow up for the study population. Trial registration. Name of the registry: Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR). Trial registration number: Trial ID: ACTRN12619000207112 Registered 13 February 2019,https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=376810 Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09304-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sina Vatandoust
- Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia. .,Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, Flinders University, Flinders Drive, Bedford Park, Adelaide, South Australia, 5042, Australia.
| | - David Wattchow
- Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia.,Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, Flinders University, Flinders Drive, Bedford Park, Adelaide, South Australia, 5042, Australia
| | - Luigi Sposato
- Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia.,Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, Flinders University, Flinders Drive, Bedford Park, Adelaide, South Australia, 5042, Australia
| | - Michael Z Michael
- Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia.,Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, Flinders University, Flinders Drive, Bedford Park, Adelaide, South Australia, 5042, Australia
| | - John Leung
- Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia.,GenesisCare, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Kirsten Gormly
- Dr Jones & Partners Medical Imaging, Adelaide, Australia.,University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Gang Chen
- Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Erin L Symonds
- Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia.,Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, Flinders University, Flinders Drive, Bedford Park, Adelaide, South Australia, 5042, Australia
| | - Jeanne Tie
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia.,Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.,University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Lito Electra Papanicolas
- Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia.,South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Susan Woods
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.,South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Val Gebski
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kelly Mead
- Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | - Christos S Karapetis
- Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia.,Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, Flinders University, Flinders Drive, Bedford Park, Adelaide, South Australia, 5042, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Gandhi M, Tan RS, Lim SL, Rand K, Lam CSP, Luo N, Cheung YB. Investigating 5-Level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) Values Based on Preferences of Patients With Heart Disease. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2022; 25:451-460. [PMID: 35227458 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Revised: 08/25/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Several studies have shown that patients with heart disease value hypothetical health states differently from the general population. We aimed to investigate the health preferences of patients with heart disease and develop a value set for the 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) based on these patient preferences. METHODS Patients with confirmed heart disease were recruited from 2 hospitals in Singapore. A total of 86 EQ-5D-5L health states (10 per patient) were valued using a composite time trade-off method according to the international valuation protocol for EQ-5D-5L; 20-parameter linear models and 8-parameter cross-attribute level effects models with and without an N45 term (indicating whether any health state dimension at level 4 or 5 existed) were estimated. Each model included patient-specific random intercepts. Model performance was evaluated for out-of-sample and in-sample predictive accuracy in terms of root mean square error. The discriminative ability of the utility values was assessed using heart disease-related functional classes. RESULTS A total of 576 patients were included in the analysis. The preferred model, with the lowest out-of-sample root mean square error, was a 20-parameter linear model including N45. Predicted utility values ranged from -0.727 for the worst state to 1 for full health; the value for the second-best state was 0.981. Utility values demonstrated good discriminative ability in differentiating among patients of varied functional classes. CONCLUSIONS An EQ-5D-5L value set representing the preferences of patients with heart disease was developed. The value set could be used for patient-centric economic evaluation and health-related quality of life assessment for patients with heart disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mihir Gandhi
- Biostatistics, Singapore Clinical Research Institute, Singapore; Centre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore; Centre for Child Health Research, Tampere University, Finland.
| | - Ru San Tan
- Department of Cardiology, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Shir Lynn Lim
- Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, Singapore
| | - Kim Rand
- Health Services Research Centre, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway; Maths in Health B. V, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Carolyn S P Lam
- Department of Cardiology, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nan Luo
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yin Bun Cheung
- Centre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore; Centre for Child Health Research, Tampere University, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Nicol JL, Woodrow C, Cunningham BJ, Mollee P, Weber N, Smith MD, Nicol AJ, Gordon LG, Hill MM, Skinner TL. An Individualized Exercise Intervention for People with Multiple Myeloma—Study Protocol of a Randomized Waitlist-Controlled Trial. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:901-923. [PMID: 35200576 PMCID: PMC8870457 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29020077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
People with multiple myeloma (MM) are second only to people with lung cancer for the poorest reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of all cancer types. Whether exercise can improve HRQoL in MM, where bone pain and lesions are common, requires investigation. This trial aims to evaluate the efficacy of an exercise intervention compared with control on HRQoL in people with MM. Following baseline testing, people with MM (n = 60) will be randomized to an exercise (EX) or waitlist control (WT) group. EX will complete 12-weeks of supervised (24 sessions) and unsupervised (12 sessions) individualized, modular multimodal exercise training. From weeks 12–52, EX continue unsupervised training thrice weekly, with one optional supervised group-based session weekly from weeks 12–24. The WT will be asked to maintain their current activity levels for the first 12-weeks, before completing the same protocol as EX for the following 52 weeks. Primary (patient-reported HRQoL) and secondary (bone health and pain, fatigue, cardiorespiratory fitness, muscle strength, body composition, disease response, and blood biomarkers) outcomes will be assessed at baseline, 12-, 24- and 52-weeks. Adverse events, attendance, and adherence will be recorded and cost-effectiveness analysis performed. The findings will inform whether exercise should be included as part of standard myeloma care to improve the health of this unique population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L. Nicol
- School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia; (B.J.C.); (A.J.N.); (T.L.S.)
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane 4006, Australia; (L.G.G.); (M.M.H.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Carmel Woodrow
- Haematology, Division of Cancer, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane 4102, Australia; (C.W.); (P.M.)
| | - Brent J. Cunningham
- School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia; (B.J.C.); (A.J.N.); (T.L.S.)
| | - Peter Mollee
- Haematology, Division of Cancer, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane 4102, Australia; (C.W.); (P.M.)
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4006, Australia
| | - Nicholas Weber
- Haematology, Cancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane 4006, Australia;
| | - Michelle D. Smith
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia;
| | - Andrew J. Nicol
- School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia; (B.J.C.); (A.J.N.); (T.L.S.)
- Brisbane Clinic for Lymphoma, Myeloma and Leukaemia, Greenslopes Private Hospital, Brisbane 4120, Australia
| | - Louisa G. Gordon
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane 4006, Australia; (L.G.G.); (M.M.H.)
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4006, Australia
- Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, School of Nursing and Cancer, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane 4059, Australia
| | - Michelle M. Hill
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane 4006, Australia; (L.G.G.); (M.M.H.)
- UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4006, Australia
| | - Tina L. Skinner
- School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia; (B.J.C.); (A.J.N.); (T.L.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Lee YC, King MT, O'Connell RL, Lanceley A, Joly F, Hilpert F, Davis A, Roncolato FT, Okamoto A, Bryce J, Donnellan P, Oza AM, Avall-Lundqvist E, Berek JS, Ledermann JA, Berton D, Sehouli J, Feeney A, Kaminsky MC, Diamante K, Stockler MR, Friedlander ML. Symptom burden and quality of life with chemotherapy for recurrent ovarian cancer: the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup-Symptom Benefit Study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2022; 32:761-768. [PMID: 35086926 PMCID: PMC9185817 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-003142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG)-Symptom Benefit Study was designed to evaluate the effects of chemotherapy on symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQL) in women having chemotherapy for platinum resistant/refractory recurrent ovarian cancer (PRR-ROC) and potentially platinum sensitive with ≥3 lines of chemotherapy (PPS-ROC ≥3). Methods Participants completed the Measure of Ovarian Cancer Symptoms and Treatment (MOST) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire QLQ-C30 questionnaires at baseline and every 3–4 weeks until progression. Participants were classified symptomatic if they rated ≥4 of 10 in at least one-third of symptoms in the MOST index. Improvement in MOST was defined as two consecutive scores of ≤3 in at least half of the symptomatic items at baseline. Improvement in HRQL was defined as two consecutive scores ≥10 points above baseline in the QLQ-C30 summary score scale (range 0–100). Results Of 948 participants enrolled, 910 (96%) completed baseline questionnaires: 546 with PRR-ROC and 364 with PPS-ROC ≥3. The proportions of participants symptomatic at baseline as per MOST indexes were: abdominal 54%, psychological 53%, and disease- or treatment-related 35%. Improvement was reported in MOST indexes: abdominal 40%, psychological 35%, and disease- or treatment-related 38%. Median time to improvement in abdominal symptoms occurred earlier for PRR-ROC than for PPS-ROC ≥3 (4 vs 6 weeks, p=0.044); median duration of improvement was also similar (9.0 vs 11.7 weeks, p=0.65). Progression-free survival was longer among those with improvement in abdominal symptoms than in those without (median 7.2 vs 2.5 months, p<0.0001). Improvements in HRQL were reported by 77/448 (17%) with PRR-ROC and 61/301 (20%) with PPS-ROC ≥3 (p=0.29), and 102/481 (21%) of those with abdominal symptoms at baseline. Conclusion Over 50% of participants reported abdominal and psychological symptoms at baseline. Of those, 40% reported an improvement within 2 months of starting chemotherapy. Approximately one in six participants reported an improvement in HRQL. Symptom monitoring and supportive care is important as chemotherapy palliated less than half of symptomatic participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yeh Chen Lee
- Australia New Zealand Gynaecological Oncology Group (ANZGOG), Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.,University of Sydney, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.,Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Madeleine T King
- University of Sydney, Quality of Life Office of Psycho-Oncology Research Group (PoCoG), Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rachel L O'Connell
- University of Sydney, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anne Lanceley
- UCL Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Florence Joly
- GINECO-Group d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens, Paris, France.,Oncology, Ctr Francois Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Felix Hilpert
- Arbeitsgesmeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie Studiengruppe (AGO) und North-Eastern German Society of Gynecologcial Oncology (NOGGO), Kiel, Germany.,Onkologisches Therapiezentrum, Krankenhaus Jerusalem, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alison Davis
- Australia New Zealand Gynaecological Oncology Group (ANZGOG), Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.,Medical Oncology, Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Felicia T Roncolato
- Australia New Zealand Gynaecological Oncology Group (ANZGOG), Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.,University of Sydney, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Aikou Okamoto
- Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group (JGOG), Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Minato-ku, Japan
| | - Jane Bryce
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Campania, Italy.,Ascension St John Clinical Research Institute, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.,MITO Multicentre Italian Trials in Ovarian and gynecologic cancer, Italy
| | - Paul Donnellan
- Cancer Trials Ireland, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - Amit M Oza
- Princess Margaret Consortium (PMHC), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Elisabeth Avall-Lundqvist
- Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology (NSGO), Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Oncology and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linkoping University, Linkoping, Sweden.,Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jonathan S Berek
- Cooperative Gynecologic Oncology Investigators (COGI), Stanford, California, USA.,Stanford Women's Cancer Centre, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | | | - Dominique Berton
- GINECO-Group d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens, Paris, France.,Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Centre René Gauducheau, Saint Herblain, France
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Arbeitsgesmeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie Studiengruppe (AGO) und North-Eastern German Society of Gynecological Oncology (NOGGO), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Gynecology and Oncological Surgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Amanda Feeney
- The Cancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, NCRI UK, London, UK
| | - Marie-Christine Kaminsky
- GINECO-Group d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens, Paris, France.,Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France
| | - Katrina Diamante
- University of Sydney, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Martin R Stockler
- University of Sydney, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael L Friedlander
- Australia New Zealand Gynaecological Oncology Group (ANZGOG), Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia .,Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Farrell R, Burling M, Lee YC, Pather S, Robledo K, Mercieca-Bebber R, Stockler M. Clinical Trial Protocol for HyNOVA: Hyperthermic and Normothermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy following interval cytoreductive surgery for stage III epithelial OVArian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer (ANZGOG1901/2020). J Gynecol Oncol 2022; 33:e1. [PMID: 34783204 PMCID: PMC8728663 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Revised: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecological cancer, causing over 200,000 deaths worldwide in 2020. Initial standard treatment for primary ovarian cancer is optimal cytoreductive surgery (CRS) preceded and/or followed by intravenous platinum-based chemotherapy. However, most women develop recurrence within the peritoneal cavity and die of disease. Results of the OVIHIPEC 1 trial (2018) showed improved survival of 34% when hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) was given immediately following interval-CRS in women with stage III disease. However, it is unknown if the effect of HIPEC is due to hyperthermia, one extra cycle of intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy, or other factors. There is also concern that hyperthermia might be associated with an increase in adverse events (AEs) due to a heightened systemic inflammatory response. HyNOVA is a seamless, multi-stage randomized study that attempts to answer these questions by comparing HIPEC to normothermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (NIPEC), focusing on safety (stage 1), then assessing activity (stage 2) and effectiveness (stage 3). In this initial study, we hypothesize that NIPEC will result in a lower rate of severe AEs compared to HIPEC. METHODS This initial stage of HyNOVA is a phase II study of 80 women with International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics stage III epithelial ovarian cancer, with at least stable disease following 3-4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, achieving interval-CRS to <2.5 mm residual disease. Participants are randomized 1:1 to receive IP cisplatin 100 mg/m² for 90 minutes either as HIPEC, heated to 42°C (41.5°C-42.5°C), or NIPEC, at 37°C (36.5°C-37.5°C). The primary outcome is the proportion of AEs ≥ grade 3 occurring within 90 days. Secondary outcomes are AE of interest, surgical morbidity, patient reported outcomes, resource allocation, feasibility, progression-free survival and overall survival. AEs are measured using both CTCAE v5.0 and Clavien-Dindo classification, particularly infection, pain, bowel dysfunction, and anemia. Tertiary outcomes are potential predictive biomarkers measured before and after HIPEC/NIPEC including circulating cell-free tumor DNA, tissue factors, and systemic inflammatory markers. There are 4 participating Australian sites with experience in CRS and HIPEC for peritoneal malignancy. HyNOVA is funded by an MRFF grant (APP1199155). TRIAL REGISTRATION ANZCTR Identifier: ACTRN12621000269831.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rhonda Farrell
- Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, Australia
- University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Michael Burling
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Yeh Chen Lee
- Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, Australia
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Selvan Pather
- Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, Australia
- University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kristy Robledo
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Martin Stockler
- Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, Australia
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Soare IA, Leeuwenkamp O, Longworth L. Estimation of Health-Related Utilities for 177Lu-DOTATATE in GEP-NET Patients Using Utilities Mapped from EORTC QLQ-C30 to EQ-5D-3L and QLU-C10D Utilities. PHARMACOECONOMICS - OPEN 2021; 5:715-725. [PMID: 34260017 PMCID: PMC8611167 DOI: 10.1007/s41669-021-00280-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/05/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NET) are a rare, life-threatening type of cancer. The survival benefit of 177Lu-DOTATATE has been demonstrated in GEP-NET patients. Health technology assessment bodies require data on health-related utility impacts of treatment. A cancer-specific instrument, EORTC QLQ-C30, was used to collect the data for 177Lu-DOTATATE within clinical studies, but utility-based instruments were not included. OBJECTIVE The main aim of this study was to compare EQ-5D-3L and QLU-C10D utilities obtained from EORTC QLQ-C30 using two different approaches. A secondary aim was to analyse the EQ-5D-3L and QLU-C10D utilities of patients treated with 177Lu-DOTATATE versus best supportive care. A supplementary aim was to evaluate the effect of 177Lu-DOTATATE on patients' health-related utility over time. METHODS Three datasets were used for the analysis. NETTER-1 is a clinical trial, whilst ERASMUS and Guy's and St. Thomas (GStT) are real-world datasets. Two mapping algorithms (response mapping and ordinary least square regression) were applied to generate EQ-5D-3L utilities from EORTC QLQ-C30. An algorithm was used to obtain QLU-C10D utilities from EORTC QLQ-C30. RESULTS In all studies, EQ-5D-3L utilities were higher than QLU-C10D utilities at most time points measured, although the magnitude of the differences was small. In NETTER-1, EQ-5D-3L and QLU-C10D utilities were higher in the 177Lu-DOTATATE arm compared with the octreotide long-acting release (LAR) arm, overall and pre-progression. In all studies, patients' health-related utilities seem to be maintained over time. CONCLUSION There were small differences between EQ-5D-3L and QLU-C10D utilities, but these did not translate to relative differences over time or between groups. In NETTER-1, patients in the 177Lu-DOTATATE arm had higher health-related utilities than patients in the octreotide LAR arm. Health-related utility may at least remain maintained in patients with GEP-NET receiving 177Lu-DOTATATE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Oscar Leeuwenkamp
- Advanced Accelerator Applications, a Novartis company, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Louise Longworth
- PHMR Limited, Berkeley Works, Berkley Grove, London, NW1 8XY, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Spencer A, Rivero-Arias O, Wong R, Tsuchiya A, Bleichrodt H, Edward R, Norman R, Lloyd A, Clarke P. The QALY at 50: One story many voices. Soc Sci Med 2021; 296:114653. [DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Revised: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
39
|
Tait MA, Costa DSJ, Campbell R, Norman R, Schug S, Rutherford C. A Quality-of-Life Evaluation Study Assessing Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients Receiving Medicinal Cannabis (the QUEST Initiative): Protocol for a Longitudinal Observational Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2021; 10:e32327. [PMID: 34821570 PMCID: PMC8663597 DOI: 10.2196/32327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2021] [Revised: 09/25/2021] [Accepted: 09/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Evidence supports several countries introducing legislation to allow cannabis-based medicine as an adjunctive treatment for the symptomatic relief of chronic pain, chemotherapy-induced nausea, spasticity in multiple sclerosis (MS), epileptic seizures, depression, and anxiety. However, clinical trial participants do not represent the entire spectrum of disease and health status seen in patients currently accessing medicinal cannabis in practice. Objective This study aims to collect real-world data to evaluate health-related quality of life in patients prescribed medicinal cannabis oil and describe any differences over time, from before starting therapy to after 3 and 12 months of therapy. Methods Adult patients newly prescribed medicinal cannabis oil by authorized prescribers and under the Special Access Schemes across Australia will be screened for eligibility and invited to participate. A sample size of 2142 is required, with a 3-month follow-up. All participants will complete the EuroQol 5-Dimension; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-30; Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21; Patients’ Global Impression of Change; Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form (SF) version 1.0: Sleep Disturbance 8b; and PROMIS SF Fatigue 13a questionnaires. Patients with chronic pain conditions will also complete the PROMIS SF version 1.0: Pain Intensity 3a and PROMIS SF version 1.0: Pain Interference 8a. Patients with movement disorders will also complete Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL) SF version 1.0: Upper Extremity Function (Fine Motor and Activities of Daily Living) and if chorea is indicated, the Neuro-QoL SF version 2.0: Huntington’s Disease health-related Quality of LIFE-Chorea 6a. All questionnaires will be administered at baseline, 2 weeks (titration), monthly up to 3 months, and then every 2 months up to 1 year. Results Recruitment commenced in November 2020. By June 2021, 1095 patients were screened for the study by 69 physicians in centers across 6 Australian states: Australian Capital Territory, New South Wales, Queensland, South Australia, Victoria, and Western Australia. Of the patients screened, 833 (39% of the target sample size) provided consent and completed baseline questionnaires. Results are expected to be published in 2022. Results of this study will show whether patient-reported outcomes improve in patients accessing prescribed medicinal cannabis from baseline to 3 months and whether any changes are maintained over a 12-month period. This study will also identify differences in improvements in patient-reported outcomes among patients with different chronic conditions (eg, chronic pain, MS, epilepsy, Parkinson disease, or cancer). Conclusions This protocol contains detailed methods that will be used across multiple sites in Australia. The findings from this study have the potential to be integral to treatment assessment and recommendations for patients with chronic pain and other health indicators for accessing medicinal cannabis. Trial Registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ANZCTRN12621000063819; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=380807&isReview=true International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/32327
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret-Ann Tait
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Daniel S J Costa
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Rachel Campbell
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Richard Norman
- School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| | - Stephan Schug
- Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Claudia Rutherford
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Shah KK, Bennett B, Lenny A, Longworth L, Brazier JE, Oppe M, Pickard AS, Shaw JW. Adapting preference-based utility measures to capture the impact of cancer treatment-related symptoms. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2021; 22:1301-1309. [PMID: 34142266 PMCID: PMC8526451 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-021-01337-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
It is important that patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures used to assess cancer therapies adequately capture the benefits and risks experienced by patients, particularly when adverse event profiles differ across therapies. This study explores the case for augmenting preference-based utility measures to capture the impact of cancer treatment-related symptoms. Additional cancer treatment-related items could be specific (e.g., rash) or global. While specific items are easier to describe and understand, their use may miss rarer symptoms and those that are currently unknown but will arise from future medical advancements. The appropriate number of additional items, the independence of those items, and their impact on the psychometric properties of the core instrument require consideration. Alternatively, a global item could encompass all potential treatment-related symptoms, of any treatments for any disease. However, such an item may not be well understood by general public respondents in valuation exercises. Further challenges include the decision about whether to generate de novo value sets for the modified instrument or to map to existing tariffs. The fluctuating and transient nature of treatment-related symptoms may be inconsistent with the methods used in conventional valuation exercises. Fluctuating symptoms could be missed by sub-optimal measure administration timing. The addition of items also poses double-counting risks. In summary, the addition of treatment-related symptom items could increase the sensitivity of existing utility measures to capture known and unknown treatment effects in oncology, while retaining the core domains. However, more research is needed to investigate the challenges, particularly regarding valuation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koonal K Shah
- PHMR, London, UK.
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
| | | | | | | | - John E Brazier
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Shaw JW, Bennett B, Trigg A, DeRosa M, Taylor F, Kiff C, Ntais D, Noon K, King MT, Cocks K. A Comparison of Generic and Condition-Specific Preference-Based Measures Using Data From Nivolumab Trials: EQ-5D-3L, Mapping to the EQ-5D-5L, and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Utility Measure-Core 10 Dimensions. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2021; 24:1651-1659. [PMID: 34711366 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.05.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2020] [Revised: 04/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES There is growing interest in condition-specific preference measures, including the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Utility Measure-Core 10 Dimensions (QLU-C10D). This research assessed the implications of using utility indices on the basis of the EQ-5D-3L, a mapping of EQ-5D-3L to the EQ-5D-5L, and the QLU-C10D, and compared their psychometric properties. METHODS Data were taken from 8 phase 3 randomized controlled trials of nivolumab with or without ipilimumab for the treatment of solid tumors. Utilities for progression-related states were calculated using the UK and English value sets and incremental quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) derived from established UK cost-effectiveness models. The psychometric properties of the utility indices were assessed using pooled trial data. RESULTS Compared with the EQ-5D-3L index, the mapped EQ-5D-5L index yielded an average of 6% more and the QLU-C10D index an average of 2% fewer incremental QALYs for nivolumab versus comparators. All indices could differentiate between groups defined by performance status, cancer stage, or self-reported health status at baseline and detect meaningful changes in performance status, tumor response, health status, and quality of life over approximately 12 weeks of treatment. CONCLUSIONS The lower QALY yield of the QLU-C10D was balanced by evidence of greater validity and responsiveness. Benefits gained from using the QLU-C10D may be apparent when treatments affect targeted symptoms and functional aspects, including sleep, bowel function, appetite, nausea, and fatigue. The observed differences in QALYs may not be sufficiently large to affect health technology assessment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James W Shaw
- Worldwide Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
| | - Bryan Bennett
- Bristol Myers Squibb Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Uxbridge, England, UK
| | - Andrew Trigg
- Patient-Centered Outcomes, Adelphi Values Ltd, Bollington, England, UK
| | - Michael DeRosa
- Patient-Centered Outcomes, Adelphi Values, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Fiona Taylor
- Patient-Centered Outcomes, Adelphi Values, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Dionysios Ntais
- Bristol Myers Squibb Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Uxbridge, England, UK
| | - Katie Noon
- Bristol Myers Squibb Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Uxbridge, England, UK
| | | | - Kim Cocks
- Patient-Centered Outcomes, Adelphi Values Ltd, Bollington, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Kim H, Cook G, Goodall S, Liew D. Comparison of EQ-5D-3L with QLU-C10D in Metastatic Melanoma Using Cost-Utility Analysis. PHARMACOECONOMICS - OPEN 2021; 5:459-467. [PMID: 33891268 PMCID: PMC8333246 DOI: 10.1007/s41669-021-00265-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/03/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) prefers the use of the generic EQ-5D instrument to estimate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and recommends that condition-specific instruments only be used when EQ-5D data are not available or not appropriate. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to compare the utility gain and cost-effectiveness results of using the generic EQ-5D-3L instrument to the condition-specific Quality-of-Life Utility Measure-Core 10 dimensions (QLU-C10D) by applying both sets of values in a published cost-utility analysis (CUA) of immunotherapy for metastatic melanoma. METHODS Quality-of-life data were drawn from a clinical study in which both QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D-3L tools were used. The potential influence of the two instruments on cost-effectiveness was assessed using a three-state Markov model. Descriptive statistics and standard health economic outputs were compared between analyses that applied the two different utility measures. RESULTS Mean baseline utility values as measured by the QLU-C10D (mean = 0.744, SD = 0.219) were not statistically different (p > 0.05) compared to values derived from EQ-5D-3L (mean = 0.735, SD = 0.239). The two instruments were correlated (Pearson's correlation = 0.74); however, concordance was low (Lin's concordance correlation coefficient < 0.90) at baseline. The model predicted slightly higher QALYs gained when using EQ-5D-3L over QLU-C10D-derived utilities (1.87 vs 1.74, respectively). This resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of US$30.5K when using EQ-5D-3L utilities, compared to US$32.7K when using QLU-C10D utilities. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves based on the two sets of utilities were almost indistinguishable. CONCLUSION This study supports the use of the generic EQ-5D instrument in immunotherapy treated metastatic melanoma, and found no additional benefit for using the disease-specific QLU-C10D when using Australian weights.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hansoo Kim
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
| | - Greg Cook
- Bristol-Myers Squibb, Mulgrave, VIC, Australia
| | - Stephen Goodall
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Danny Liew
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Finch AP, Gamper E, Norman R, Viney R, Holzner B, King M, Kemmler G. Estimation of an EORTC QLU-C10 Value Set for Spain Using a Discrete Choice Experiment. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2021; 39:1085-1098. [PMID: 34216380 PMCID: PMC8352836 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-021-01058-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The EORTC QLU-C10D is a preference-based measure derived from the EORTC QLQ-C30. For use in economic evaluations, country-specific value sets are needed. This study aimed to generate an EORTC QLU-C10 value set for Spain. METHODS A sample of the Spanish general population completed an online discrete choice experiment. An attribute-balanced incomplete block design was used to select 960 choice tasks, with a total of 1920 health states. Each participant was randomly assigned 16 choice sets without replacement. Data were modelled using generalized estimating equations and mixed logistic regressions. RESULTS A total of 1625 panel members were invited to participate, 1010 of whom were included in the study. Dimension decrements were generally monotonic with larger disutilities at increased severity levels. Dimensions associated with larger decrements were physical functioning and pain, while the dimension with the smallest decrement was sleep disturbances. The PITS state (i.e. worst attainable health) for the Spanish population is - 0.043. CONCLUSIONS This study generated the first Spanish value set for the QLU-C10D. This can facilitate cost-utility analyses when applied to data collected with the EORTC QLQ-C30.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aureliano Paolo Finch
- Research Centre on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), Bocconi University, Via Sarfatti 25, S1 4DT, Milan, Italy.
- Health Values Research and Consultancy, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Eva Gamper
- Division of Psychiatry I, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Richard Norman
- School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| | - Rosalie Viney
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE), UTS Business School, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Bernhard Holzner
- Division of Psychiatry I, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
- Division of Psychiatry II, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Madeleine King
- School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Georg Kemmler
- Division of Psychiatry II, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
King MT, Norman R, Mercieca-Bebber R, Costa DSJ, McTaggart-Cowan H, Peacock S, Janda M, Müller F, Viney R, Pickard AS, Cella D. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Eight Dimension (FACT-8D), a Multi-Attribute Utility Instrument Derived From the Cancer-Specific FACT-General (FACT-G) Quality of Life Questionnaire: Development and Australian Value Set. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2021; 24:862-873. [PMID: 34119085 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2020] [Revised: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop a cancer-specific multi-attribute utility instrument derived from the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) health-related quality of life (HRQL) questionnaire. METHODS We derived a descriptive system based on a subset of the 27-item FACT-G. Item selection was informed by psychometric analyses of existing FACT-G data (n = 6912) and by patient input (n = 82). We then conducted an online valuation survey, with participants recruited via an Australian general population online panel. A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was used, with attributes being the HRQL dimensions of the descriptive system and survival duration, and 16 choice-pairs per participant. Utility decrements were estimated with conditional logit and mixed logit modeling. RESULTS Eight HRQL dimensions were included in the descriptive system: pain, fatigue, nausea, sleep, work, social support, sadness, and future health worry; each with 5 levels. Of 1737 panel members who accessed the valuation survey, 1644 (95%) completed 1 or more DCE choice-pairs and were included in analyses. Utility decrements were generally monotonic; within each dimension, poorer HRQL levels generally had larger utility decrements. The largest utility decrements were for the highest levels of pain (-0.40) and nausea (-0.28). The worst health state had a utility of -0.54, considerably worse than dead. CONCLUSIONS A descriptive system and preference-based scoring approach were developed for the FACT-8D, a new cancer-specific multi-attribute utility instrument derived from the FACT-G. The Australian value set is the first of a series of country-specific value sets planned that can facilitate cost-utility analyses based on items from the FACT-G and related FACIT questionnaires containing FACT-G items.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madeleine T King
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Richard Norman
- Curtin University - Perth City Campus, and Department of Health Policy and Management, Bentley Campus, Perth, ACT, Australia
| | - Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Sydney, NSW, Australia; The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Daniel S J Costa
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Pain Management Research Institute, Saint Leonards, NSW, Australia and The University of Sydney, Sydney Medical School, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Helen McTaggart-Cowan
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada and British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Simon Fraser University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Burnaby, BC, Canada
| | - Stuart Peacock
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada and British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Monika Janda
- Queensland University of Technology, School of Public Health, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Fabiola Müller
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Science, School of Psychology, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, NL
| | - Rosalie Viney
- University of Technology Sydney, Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Alan Simon Pickard
- University of Illinois at Chicago, Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - David Cella
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Department of Medical Social Sciences, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Wu J, Xie S, He X, Chen G, Bai G, Feng D, Hu M, Jiang J, Wang X, Wu H, Wu Q, Brazier JE. Valuation of SF-6Dv2 Health States in China Using Time Trade-off and Discrete-Choice Experiment with a Duration Dimension. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2021; 39:521-535. [PMID: 33598860 PMCID: PMC8079294 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-020-00997-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/24/2020] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Our objective was to generate a value set for the SF-6Dv2 using time trade-off (TTO) and a discrete-choice experiment with a duration dimension (DCETTO) in China. METHODS A large representative sample of the Chinese general population was recruited from eight provinces/municipalities in China, stratified by age, sex, education level, and proportion of urban/rural residence. Respondents completed eight TTO tasks and ten DCETTO tasks during face-to-face interviews. Ordinary least squares (OLS), random-effects, fixed-effects, and Tobit models were used for TTO data, and conditional logit and mixed logit models were used for DCETTO. The monotonicity of model coefficients and the consistency of the predicted values according to intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), mean absolute difference (MAD), and mean squared difference (MSD) were compared between the two approaches. RESULTS In total, 3320 respondents (50.3% male; range 18-90 years) were recruited. The random-effects model and the conditional logit model were preferred for the TTO and DCETTO, respectively. The TTO values ranged from - 0.277 to 1, with 927 (4.94%) states considered as worse than dead (WTD). The corresponding range for DCETTO was - 0.535 to 1, with a higher WTD of 8.50%. DCETTO presented minor non-monotonicity with the coefficients in two dimensions. Values from the two approaches were highly consistent (ICC 0.9804, MAD 0.0588, MSD 0.0055), albeit those with DCETTO were slightly lower than those with TTO. The value set generated by TTO was preferred given the better monotonicity and the statistical significance of coefficients. CONCLUSIONS The Chinese value set for the SF-6Dv2 was established based on the TTO approach, but the DCETTO also performed well. Minor issues of non-monotonicity did present for DCETTO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Wu
- School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Room 209, 24th building, 92th Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, 300072, China.
- Center for Social Science Survey and Data, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
| | - Shitong Xie
- School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Room 209, 24th building, 92th Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, 300072, China
- Center for Social Science Survey and Data, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| | - Xiaoning He
- School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Room 209, 24th building, 92th Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, 300072, China
- Center for Social Science Survey and Data, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
| | - Gang Chen
- Monash Business School, Centre for Health Economics, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Gengliang Bai
- School of Health Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Da Feng
- School of Pharmacy, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Ming Hu
- West China School of Pharmacy, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jie Jiang
- College of Pharmacy, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaohui Wang
- School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Hongyan Wu
- School of Medicine and Health Management, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China
| | - Qunhong Wu
- Department of Health Policy, Health Management College, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
- Department of Social Medicine, School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - John E Brazier
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Touré M, Kouakou CRC, Poder TG. Dimensions Used in Instruments for QALY Calculation: A Systematic Review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:4428. [PMID: 33919471 PMCID: PMC8122477 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18094428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Revised: 04/16/2021] [Accepted: 04/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Economic assessment is of utmost importance in the healthcare decision-making process. The quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) concept provides a rare opportunity to combine two crucial aspects of health, i.e., mortality and morbidity, into a single index to perform cost-utility comparison. Today, many tools are available to measure morbidity in terms of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and a large literature describes how to use them. Knowing their characteristics and development process is a key point for elaborating, adapting, or selecting the most well-suited instrument for further needs. In this aim, we conducted a systematic review on instruments used for QALY calculation, and 46 studies were selected after searches in four databases: Medline EBSCO, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and PubMed. The search procedure was done to identify all relevant publications up to 18 June 2020. We mainly focused on the type of instrument developed (i.e., generic or specific), the number and the nature of dimensions and levels used, the elicitation method and the model selected to determine utility scores, and the instrument and algorithm validation methods. Results show that studies dealing with the development of specific instruments were mostly motivated by the inappropriateness of generic instruments in their field. For the dimensions' and levels' selection, item response theory, Rasch analysis, and literature review were mostly used. Dimensions and levels were validated by methods like the Loevinger H, the standardised response mean, or discussions with experts in the field. The time trade-off method was the most widely used elicitation method, followed by the visual analogue scale. Random effects regression models were frequently used in determining utility scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moustapha Touré
- Department of Economics, Business School, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC J1K 2R1, Canada; (M.T.); (C.R.C.K.)
- Centre de Recherche de l’IUSMM, CIUSSS de l’Est de L’île de Montréal, Montréal, QC H1N 3V2, Canada
| | - Christian R. C. Kouakou
- Department of Economics, Business School, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC J1K 2R1, Canada; (M.T.); (C.R.C.K.)
- Centre de Recherche de l’IUSMM, CIUSSS de l’Est de L’île de Montréal, Montréal, QC H1N 3V2, Canada
| | - Thomas G. Poder
- Centre de Recherche de l’IUSMM, CIUSSS de l’Est de L’île de Montréal, Montréal, QC H1N 3V2, Canada
- Department of Management, Evaluation and Health Policy, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H3N 1X9, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Kularatna S, Amilani U, Senanayake S, Tonmukayakul U, Jamieson L, Arrow P. Developing an early childhood oral health impact-specific health-state classification system for a new preference-based instrument, the ECOHIS-4D. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2021; 50:191-198. [PMID: 33870551 DOI: 10.1111/cdoe.12650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2020] [Revised: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Most of the paediatric quality-of-life instruments in oral health research are not preference-based measures, thus cannot be used in economic evaluations. The Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS) is one such instrument which assesses oral health impact on children's quality of life among three- to five-year-olds. With increasing demands for more resource allocation in oral health care, there is a need for an outcome metric which can be used as the outcome in economic evaluations. The aim of this study was to develop a preference-based, health-state classification system from the existing ECOHIS instrument. METHODS The 13-item ECOHIS instrument was applied to the carers of 280 preschoolers who participated in a clinical trial in metropolitan Perth, Western Australia. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted to assess the dimensionality of the ECOHIS. Rasch analysis was used to eliminate and select items per determined dimensions and to reduce the number of response options for each item, because six levels were not amenable to valuation. The final classification system was determined through a combination of psychometric and expert advice. RESULTS Items loaded on to four dimensions with the factor analysis. Using Rasch analysis, three items were selected from the first dimension (child functional and psychological impact) and one item from the second dimension (child social interaction impact). None were selected from the third dimension (parental distress and family function impact) as it is not an appropriate proxy method of measuring the level of impact on a child. The final classification system has four dimensions with three levels in each, and so it has been named the ECOHIS-4D. CONCLUSIONS The ECOHIS-4D classification system is a new preference-based instrument derived from the existing ECOHIS instrument. Future valuation studies will develop a utility value set for the health states defined by this classification system, and this will guide economic evaluations related to oral health interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjeewa Kularatna
- Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Uttara Amilani
- Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Sameera Senanayake
- Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | | | | | - Peter Arrow
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Revicki DA, King MT, Viney R, Pickard AS, Mercieca-Bebber R, Shaw JW, Müller F, Norman R. United States Utility Algorithm for the EORTC QLU-C10D, a Multiattribute Utility Instrument Based on a Cancer-Specific Quality-of-Life Instrument. Med Decis Making 2021; 41:485-501. [PMID: 33813946 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x211003569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The EORTC QLU-C10D is a multiattribute utility measure derived from the cancer-specific quality-of-life questionnaire, the EORTC QLQ-C30. The QLU-C10D contains 10 dimensions (physical, role, social and emotional functioning, pain, fatigue, sleep, appetite, nausea, bowel problems). The objective of this study was to develop a United States value set for the QLU-C10D. METHODS A US online panel was quota recruited to achieve a representative sample for sex, age (≥18 y), race, and ethnicity. Respondents undertook a discrete choice experiment, each completing 16 choice-pairs, randomly assigned from a total of 960 choice-pairs. Each pair included 2 QLU-C10D health states and duration. Data were analyzed using conditional logistic regression, parameterized to fit the quality-adjusted life-year framework. Utility weights were calculated as the ratio of each dimension-level coefficient to the coefficient for life expectancy. RESULTS A total of 2480 panel members opted in, 2333 (94%) completed at least 1 choice-pair, and 2273 (92%) completed all choice-pairs. Within dimensions, weights were generally monotonic. Physical functioning, role functioning, and pain were associated with the largest utility weights. Cancer-specific dimensions, such as nausea and bowel problems, were associated with moderate utility decrements, as were general issues such as problems with emotional functioning and social functioning. Sleep problems and fatigue were associated with smaller utility decrements. The value of the worst health state was 0.032, which was slightly greater than 0 (equivalent to being dead). CONCLUSIONS This study provides the US-specific value set for the QLU-C10D. These estimated health state scores, based on responses to the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, can be used to evaluate the cost-utility of oncology treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Madeleine T King
- School of Psychology, Sydney, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rosalie Viney
- Centre for Health Economics Research & Evaluation, UTS Business School, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - A Simon Pickard
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber
- School of Psychology, Sydney, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - James W Shaw
- Patient-Reported Outcomes Assessment, Worldwide Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA
| | - Fabiola Müller
- School of Psychology, Sydney, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Richard Norman
- School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Gamper EM, Cottone F, Sommer K, Norman R, King M, Breccia M, Caocci G, Patriarca A, Palumbo GA, Stauder R, Niscola P, Platzbecker U, Caers J, Vignetti M, Efficace F. The EORTC QLU-C10D was more efficient in detecting clinical known group differences in myelodysplastic syndromes than the EQ-5D-3L. J Clin Epidemiol 2021; 137:31-44. [PMID: 33753228 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Revised: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim was to investigate the relative validity of the preference-based measure EORTC QLU-C10D in comparison with the EQ-5D-3L in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) patients. METHODS We used data from an international multicentre, observational cohort study of MDS patients. Baseline EORTC QLU-C10D and EQ-5D-3L scores were used and index scores calculated for Italy, Australia, and the UK. Criterion validity was established by Spearman and intraclass correlations (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots. Construct validity was established by the instruments' ability to discriminate known groups, i.e. groups whose health status is expected to differ. RESULTS We analyzed data from 619 MDS patients (61.1% male; median age 73.8 years). Correlations between theoretically corresponding domains were largely higher than between unrelated domains. ICCs and Bland-Altman plots indicated moderate to good criterion validity. Ceiling effects were lower for the QLU-C10D (4.7%) than for the EQ-5D-3L (22.6%). The EQ-5D-3L failed to discriminate known-groups in two and the QLU-C10D in one of the comparisons; the QLU-C10D's efficiency in doing so was higher in clinical known-groups. Results were comparable between the countries. CONCLUSIONS The QLU-C10D may be suitable to generate health utilities for economic research in MDS. Responsiveness and minimal important differences need yet to be established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva M Gamper
- Innsbruck Institute of Patient-centered Outcome Research (IIPCOR), Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - Francesco Cottone
- Italian Group for Adult Hematologic Diseases (GIMEMA), Data Center & Health Outcomes Research Unit, Rome, Italy
| | - Kathrin Sommer
- Italian Group for Adult Hematologic Diseases (GIMEMA), Data Center & Health Outcomes Research Unit, Rome, Italy
| | - Richard Norman
- School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| | - Madeleine King
- University of Sydney, School of Psychology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Massimo Breccia
- Division of Hematology, Department of Cellular Biotechnologies and Hematology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Caocci
- Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Andrea Patriarca
- Division of Hematology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy
| | - Giuseppe A Palumbo
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche, Chirurgiche e Tecnologie Avanzate "G.F. Ingrassia", University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Reinhard Stauder
- Department of Internal Medicine V (Hematology and Oncology), Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | - Uwe Platzbecker
- Clinic and Policlinic of Hematology and Cellular Therapy, Hemostaseology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Jo Caers
- Department of Hematology, CHU de Liège, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium
| | - Marco Vignetti
- Italian Group for Adult Hematologic Diseases (GIMEMA), Data Center & Health Outcomes Research Unit, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Efficace
- Italian Group for Adult Hematologic Diseases (GIMEMA), Data Center & Health Outcomes Research Unit, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Nerich V, Gamper EM, Norman R, King M, Holzner B, Viney R, Kemmler G. French Value-Set of the QLU-C10D, a Cancer-Specific Utility Measure Derived from the QLQ-C30. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2021; 19:191-202. [PMID: 32537694 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-020-00598-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The EORTC Quality of Life Utility Measure-Core 10 Dimensions (QLU-C10D) is a new multi-attribute utility instrument derived from the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30), a widely used cancer-specific quality-of-life questionnaire. It covers ten dimensions: physical, role functioning, social, emotional functioning, pain, fatigue, sleep, appetite, nausea and bowel problems. To allow national health preferences to be reflected, country-specific valuations are being performed through collaboration between the Multi-Attribute Utility Cancer (MAUCa) Consortium and the EORTC. The aim of this study was to determine the utility weights for health states in the French version of the QLU-C10D. METHODS Valuations were run in a web-based setting in a general population sample of 1033 adults. Utilities were elicited using a discrete-choice experiment (DCE). Data were analyzed by conditional logistic regression and mixed logits. RESULTS The sample was representative of the general French population in terms of gender and age. Dimensions with the largest impact on utility weights were, in this order: physical functioning, pain and emotional functioning. The impact on utilities was lower for role functioning, nausea, bowel problems and social functioning. The dimensions of sleep, fatigue and lacking appetite were associated with the smallest utility decrement. CONCLUSION The results of the present study provide utility weights for the QLU-C10D and offer interesting prospects, as some cancer-specific dimensions also received sizeable utility weights (nausea and bowel problems). In fact, the EQ-5D and the HUI 3 are recommended in France and commonly used for cancer-related CUA; however, both these instruments are generic. The availability of a new cancer-specific utility instrument, such as the QLU-C10D, could improve the quality and the pertinence of future CUA in oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Virginie Nerich
- Department of Pharmacy, University Hospital, Boulevard Fleming, 25030, Besancon Cedex, France.
- INSERM, EFS-BFC, UMR1098, University of Franche-Comté, Besançon, France.
| | - Eva Maria Gamper
- Division of Psychiatry II, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Richard Norman
- School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Madeleine King
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Bernhard Holzner
- Division of Psychiatry II, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Rosalie Viney
- Centre for for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE), UTS Business School University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Georg Kemmler
- Division of Psychiatry I, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|