Association Between CHEK2*1100delC and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Breast cancer prediction using different machine learning methods applying multi factors

OBJECTIVE

Breast cancer (BC) is a multifactorial disease and is one of the most common cancers globally. This study aimed to compare different machine learning (ML) techniques to develop a comprehensive breast cancer risk prediction model based on features of various factors.

METHODS

The population sample contained 810 records (115 cancer patients and 695 healthy individuals). 45 attributes out of 85 were selected based on the opinion of experts. These selected attributes are in genetic, biochemical, biomarker, gender, demographic and pathological factors. 13 Machine learning models were trained with proposed attributes and coefficient of attributes and internal relationships were calculated.

RESULT

Compared to other methods random forest (RF) has higher performance (accuracy 99.26%, precision 99%, and area under the curve (AUC) 99%). The results of assessing the impact and correlation of variables using the RF method based on PCA indicated that pathology, biomarker, biochemistry, gene, and demographic factors with a coefficient of 0.35, 0.23, 0.15, 0.14, and 0.13 respectively, affected the risk of BC (r2 = 0.54).

CONCLUSION

Breast cancer has several risk factors. Medical experts use these risk factors for early diagnosis. Therefore, identifying related risk factors and their effect can increase the accuracy of diagnosis. Considering the broad features for predicting breast cancer leads to the development of a comprehensive prediction model. In this study, using RF technique a breast cancer prediction model with 99.3% accuracy was developed based on multifactorial features.

Management of individuals with germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in CHEK2: A clinical practice resource of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)

PURPOSE

Although the role of CHEK2 germline pathogenic variants in cancer predisposition is well known, resources for managing CHEK2 heterozygotes in clinical practice are limited.

METHODS

An international workgroup developed guidance on clinical management of CHEK2 heterozygotes informed by peer-reviewed publications from PubMed.

RESULTS

Although CHEK2 is considered a moderate penetrance gene, cancer risks may be considered as a continuous variable, which are influenced by family history and other modifiers. Consequently, early cancer detection and prevention for CHEK2 heterozygotes should be guided by personalized risk estimates. Such estimates may result in both downgrading lifetime breast cancer risks to those similar to the general population or upgrading lifetime risk to a level at which CHEK2 heterozygotes are offered high-risk breast surveillance according to country-specific guidelines. Risk-reducing mastectomy should be guided by personalized risk estimates and shared decision making. Colorectal and prostate cancer surveillance should be considered based on assessment of family history. For CHEK2 heterozygotes who develop cancer, no specific targeted medical treatment is recommended at this time.

CONCLUSION

Systematic prospective data collection is needed to establish the spectrum of CHEK2-associated cancer risks and to determine yet-unanswered questions, such as the outcomes of surveillance, response to cancer treatment, and survival after cancer diagnosis.

ENIGMA CHEK2gether Project: A Comprehensive Study Identifies Functionally Impaired CHEK2 Germline Missense Variants Associated with Increased Breast Cancer Risk

PURPOSE

Germline pathogenic variants in CHEK2 confer moderately elevated breast cancer risk (odds ratio, OR ∼ 2.5), qualifying carriers for enhanced breast cancer screening. Besides pathogenic variants, dozens of missense CHEK2 variants of uncertain significance (VUS) have been identified, hampering the clinical utility of germline genetic testing (GGT).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We collected 460 CHEK2 missense VUS identified by the ENIGMA consortium in 15 countries. Their functional characterization was performed using CHEK2-complementation assays quantifying KAP1 phosphorylation and CHK2 autophosphorylation in human RPE1-CHEK2-knockout cells. Concordant results in both functional assays were used to categorize CHEK2 VUS from 12 ENIGMA case-control datasets, including 73,048 female patients with breast cancer and 88,658 ethnicity-matched controls.

RESULTS

A total of 430/460 VUS were successfully analyzed, of which 340 (79.1%) were concordant in both functional assays and categorized as functionally impaired (N = 102), functionally intermediate (N = 12), or functionally wild-type (WT)-like (N = 226). We then examined their association with breast cancer risk in the case-control analysis. The OR and 95% CI (confidence intervals) for carriers of functionally impaired, intermediate, and WT-like variants were 2.83 (95% CI, 2.35-3.41), 1.57 (95% CI, 1.41-1.75), and 1.19 (95% CI, 1.08-1.31), respectively. The meta-analysis of population-specific datasets showed similar results.

CONCLUSIONS

We determined the functional consequences for the majority of CHEK2 missense VUS found in patients with breast cancer (3,660/4,436; 82.5%). Carriers of functionally impaired missense variants accounted for 0.5% of patients with breast cancer and were associated with a moderate risk similar to that of truncating CHEK2 variants. In contrast, 2.2% of all patients with breast cancer carried functionally wild-type/intermediate missense variants with no clinically relevant breast cancer risk in heterozygous carriers.

Identification of PIMREG as a novel prognostic signature in breast cancer via integrated bioinformatics analysis and experimental validation

Background

Phosphatidylinositol binding clathrin assembly protein interacting mitotic regulator (PIMREG) expression is upregulated in a variety of cancers. However, its potential role in breast cancer (BC) remains uncertain.

Methods

The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases were used to gather relevant information. The expression of PIMREG and its clinical implication in BC were assessed by using Wilcoxon rank-sum test. The prognostic value of PIMREG in BC was evaluated through the Cox regression model and nomogram, and visualized by Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Genes/proteins that interact with PIMREG in BC were also identified through GeneMANIA and MaxLink. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was then performed. The correlations of the immune cell infiltration and immune checkpoints with the expression of PIMREG in BC were explored via TIMER, TISIDB, and GEPIA. Potential drugs that interact with PIMREG in BC were explored via Q-omic. The siRNA transfection, CCK-8, and transwell migration assay were conducted to explore the function of PIMREG in cell proliferation and migration.

Results

PIMREG expression was significantly higher in infiltrating ductal carcinoma, estrogen receptor negative BC, and progestin receptor negative BC. High expression of PIMREG was associated with poor overall survival, disease-specific survival, and progression-free interval. A nomogram based on PIMREG was developed with a satisfactory prognostic value. PIMREG also had a high diagnostic ability, with an area under the curve of 0.940. Its correlations with several immunomodulators were also observed. Immune checkpoint CTLA-4 was significantly positively associated with PIMREG. HDAC2 was found as a potentially critical link between PIMREG and BRCA1/2. In addition, PIMREG knockdown could inhibit cell proliferation and migration in BC.

Conclusions

The high expression of PIMREG is associated with poor prognosis and immune checkpoints in BC. HDAC2 may be a critical link between PIMREG and BRCA1/2, potentially a therapeutic target.

Diagnosis, Management, and Surveillance for Patients With PALB2, CHEK2, and ATM Gene Mutations

BACKGROUND

This study aims to capture clinical and surgical practice patterns of patients with deleterious mutations in partner and localizer of BRCA2 (PALB2), checkpoint kinase 2 (CHEK2) and ataxia telangiesctasia mutated (ATM) genes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study is a retrospective chart review of patients with PALB2, CHEK2 or ATM mutations. Patient demographics, testing indications, management decisions, and surveillance strategies were recorded.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients were found to have deleterious mutations: 14 (23%) with a PALB2 mutation, 30 (48%) with a CHEK2 mutation, and 18 (29%) patients with an ATM mutation. Thirty-one (50%) patients have a history of breast cancer. Twenty-three patients were diagnosed and treated prior to genetic testing while 8 patients learned of their mutation status and breast cancer diagnosis simultaneously. Of these 8 patients, 4 sought treatment at our institution, 3 underwent bilateral mastectomy, and 1 patient opted for lumpectomy and surveillance. Thirty-one patients had no history of breast cancer. After genetic diagnosis, 3 of the 9 patients who continued clinical follow-up proceeded with bilateral prophylactic mastectomy within 2 years. Clinical surveillance continued for 23 months on average.

CONCLUSION

Most patients who learned of their genetic and breast cancer diagnoses simultaneously underwent bilateral mastectomy, whereas only a third of patients without cancer opted for bilateral prophylactic mastectomy.

Risk of developing a second primary cancer in male breast cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

With increasing survival after cancer diagnoses, second primary cancers (SPCs) are becoming more prevalent. We investigated the incidence and site of non-breast SPC risks following male breast cancer (BC).

METHODS

PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were systematically searched for studies reporting standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) for SPCs published by March 2022. Meta-analyses used the generic inverse-variance method, assuming a random-effects model. We evaluated SIRs for overall SPCs, site-specific risks, by age at BC onset, time since BC onset and geographic region. We assessed study quality using routine techniques.

RESULTS

Eight population-based retrospective cohort studies were identified. SIRs ranged from 1.05 to 2.17. The summary SIR estimate was 1.27 (95% CI: 1.03-1.56, I²: 86%), and there were increased colorectal (SIR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.03-1.61), pancreatic (SIR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.05-2.55) and thyroid (SIR: 5.58, 95% CI: 1.04-30.05) SPC risks. When an outlying study was excluded, the summary SIR for men diagnosed with BC before age 50 was 1.50 (95% CI: 1.21-1.85), significantly higher than men diagnosed at older ages (SIR: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.98-1.33).

CONCLUSIONS

Male BC survivors are at elevated risks of developing second primary colorectal, pancreatic and thyroid cancers. The estimates may assist their clinical management and guide decisions on genetic testing.

Analysis of the Clinical Advancements for BRCA-Related Malignancies Highlights the Lack of Treatment Evidence for BRCA-Positive Male Breast Cancer

Male breast cancer (MBC) is a rare disease that accounts for less than 1% of all breast cancers and male malignancies. Despite recognised clinico-pathological and molecular differences to female breast cancer (FBC), the clinical management of MBC follows established FBC treatment strategies. Loss of function mutations in the DNA damage response genes BRCA1 and BRCA2, have been strongly implicated in the pathogenesis of MBC. While there have been extensive clinical advancements in other BRCA-related malignancies, including FBC, improvements in MBC remain stagnant. Here we present a review that highlights the lack of treatment evidence for BRCA-related MBC and the required national and global collaborative effort to address this unmet need. In doing so, we summarise the transformative clinical advancements with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in other BRCA-related cancers namely, FBC and prostate cancer.

An Update on the General Features of Breast Cancer in Male Patients—A Literature Review

Male breast cancers are uncommon, as men account for less than 1 percent of all breast carcinomas. Among the predisposing risk factors for male breast cancer, the following appear to be significant: (a) breast/chest radiation exposure, (b) estrogen use, diseases associated with hyper-estrogenism, such as cirrhosis or Klinefelter syndrome, and (c) family health history. Furthermore, there are clear familial tendencies, with a higher incidence among men who have a large number of female relatives with breast cancer and (d) major inheritance susceptibility. Moreover, in families with BRCA mutations, there is an increased risk of male breast cancer, although the risk appears to be greater with inherited BRCA2 mutations than with inherited BRCA1 mutations. Due to diagnostic delays, male breast cancer is more likely to present at an advanced stage. A core biopsy or a fine needle aspiration must be performed to confirm suspicious findings. Infiltrating ductal cancer is the most prevalent form of male breast cancer, while invasive lobular carcinoma is extremely uncommon. Male breast cancer is almost always positive for hormone receptors. A worse prognosis is associated with a more advanced stage at diagnosis for men with breast cancer. Randomized controlled trials which recruit both female and male patients should be developed in order to gain more consistent data on the optimal clinical approach.

Germline mutations in penetrant cancer predisposition genes are rare in men with prostate cancer selecting active surveillance

BACKGROUND

Pathogenic germline mutations in several rare penetrant cancer predisposition genes are associated with an increased risk of aggressive prostate cancer (PC). Our objectives were to determine the prevalence of pathogenic germline mutations in men with low-risk PC on active surveillance, and assess whether pathogenic germline mutations associate with grade reclassification or adverse pathology, recurrence, or metastases, in men treated after initial surveillance.

METHODS

Men prospectively enrolled in the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study (PASS) were retrospectively sampled for the study. Germline DNA was sequenced utilizing a hereditary cancer gene panel. Mutations were classified according to the American College of Clinical Genetics and Genomics' guidelines. The association of pathogenic germline mutations with grade reclassification and adverse characteristics was evaluated by weighted Cox proportional hazards modeling and conditional logistic regression, respectively.

RESULTS

Overall, 29 of 437 (6.6%) study participants harbored a pathogenic germline mutation of which 19 occurred in a gene involved in DNA repair (4.3%). Eight participants (1.8%) had pathogenic germline mutations in three genes associated with aggressive PC: ATM, BRCA1, and BRCA2. The presence of pathogenic germline mutations in DNA repair genes did not associate with adverse characteristics (univariate analysis HR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.36-2.06, p = 0.7). The carrier rates of pathogenic germline mutations in ATM, BRCA1, and BRCA2did not differ in men with or without grade reclassification (1.9% vs. 1.8%).

CONCLUSION

The frequency of pathogenic germline mutations in penetrant cancer predisposition genes is extremely low in men with PC undergoing active surveillance and pathogenic germline mutations had no apparent association with grade reclassification or adverse characteristics.

Postmastectomy Reconstruction in Male Breast Cancer

Introduction

Less than 1% of all breast cancers are diagnosed in males. In females, postmastectomy breast reconstruction is associated with increased patient satisfaction. However, there is a paucity of literature describing reconstructive options for postmastectomy deformity in the male chest. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate postmastectomy reconstruction outcomes in males with breast cancer.

Methods

A systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science were queried for records pertaining to the study question using medical subject heading (MeSH) terms such as “male breast cancer,” “mastectomy,” and “reconstruction.” No limitations were placed on the year of publication, country of origin, or study size. Study characteristics and patient demographics were collected. Primary outcomes of interest included postoperative complications, recurrence rate, and mortality rate.

Results

A total of 11 articles examining 29 male patients with breast cancer who underwent postmastectomy reconstruction were included for analysis. Literature was most commonly available in the form of case reports. The average age was 59.6 +/−11.4 years. Reconstruction methods included fat grafting (n = 1, 3.4%), silicone implants (n = 1, 3.4%), and autologous chest wall reconstruction with local flaps (n = 26, 89.7%). Postoperative complications occurred in two patients (6.8%), including partial nipple necrosis (n = 1) and hypertrophic scarring (n = 1). Of the studies reporting patient satisfaction, all patients were pleased with the aesthetic appearance of their chest.

Conclusion

This systematic review revealed the limited availability of research regarding postmastectomy chest reconstruction in males with breast cancer. Nevertheless, the evidence available suggests that reconstruction can restore a patient's body image and, thus, should be regularly considered and discussed with male patients. Larger studies are warranted to further shed light on this population.

Identification of Genetic Risk Factors for Familial Urinary Bladder Cancer: An Exome Sequencing Study

PURPOSE

Previous studies have shown an approximately two-fold elevation in the relative risk of urinary bladder cancer (UBC) among people with a family history that could not be entirely explained by shared environmental exposures, thus suggesting a genetic component in its predisposition. Multiple genome-wide association studies and recent gene panel sequencing studies identified several genetic loci that are associated with UBC risk; however, the list of UBC-associated variants and genes is incomplete.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We exome sequenced eight patients from three multiplex UBC pedigrees and a group of 77 unrelated familial UBC cases matched to 241 cancer-free controls. In addition, we examined pathogenic germline variation in 444 candidate genes in 392 The Cancer Genome Atlas UBC cases.

RESULTS

In the pedigrees, segregating variants were family-specific although the identified genes clustered in common pathways, most notably DNA repair (MLH1 and MSH2) and cellular metabolism (IDH1 and ME1). In the familial UBC group, the proportion of pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants was significantly higher in cases compared with controls (P = .003). Pathogenic and likely pathogenic variant load was also significantly increased in genes involved in cilia biogenesis (P = .001). In addition, a pathogenic variant in CHEK2 (NM_007194.4:c.1100del; p.T367Mfs*15) was over-represented in cases (variant frequency = 2.6%; 95% CI, 0.71 to 6.52) compared with controls (variant frequency = 0.21%; 95% CI, 0.01 to 1.15), but was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

These results point to a complex polygenic predisposition to UBC. Despite heterogeneity, the genes cluster in several biologically relevant pathways and processes, for example, DNA repair, cilia biogenesis, and cellular metabolism. Larger studies are required to determine the importance of CHEK2 in UBC etiology.

Re-evaluating cancer risks associated with the CHEK2 p.Ser428Phe Ashkenazi Jewish founder pathogenic variant

A missense variant (p.Ser428Phe [S428F]) in the CHEK2 gene is reportedly associated with a 2-3 fold increase in breast cancer risk in Ashkenazi Jews. This study aimed to re-evaluate cancer risks conferred by the CHEK2 S428F variant in Ashkenazi Jews. De-identified data from CHEK2 S428F variant carriers sequenced with multigene panels were analyzed. Overall, 486/341,531 (0.14%) cases of all ethnicities diagnosed with any cancer type were CHEK2 S428F carriers, of whom 243/9980 self-identified as Ashkenazi Jews and carried this risk variant only. Compared with ethnically matched non-cancer controls, across all cancer cases, this variant was not more prevalent (p = 0.271). Specifically, variant prevalence was not different in breast cancer cases compared with controls. Though the variant was shown to be enriched in pancreatic cancer cases (p = 0.008), sample size was small. The CHEK2 S428F variant was not overrepresented in Ashkenazi Jews with breast cancer and most other cancer types analyzed, except for pancreatic cancer, compared with ethnically matched non- cancer controls. These findings should prompt reevaluating ethnic-specific CHEK2 S428F cancer attributable risk.

Genetic Landscape of Male Breast Cancer

Male breast cancer (MBC) is now considered molecularly different from female breast cancer (FBC). Evidence from studies indicates that common genetic and epigenetic features of FBC are not shared with those diagnosed in men. Genetic predisposition is likely to play a significant role in the tumorigenesis of this rare disease. Inherited germline variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 account for around 2% and 10% of MBC cases, respectively, and the lifetime risk of breast cancer for men harboring BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations is 1.2% and 6.8%. As for FBC, pathogenic mutations in other breast cancer genes have also been recently associated with an increased risk of MBC, such as PALB2 and CHEK2 mutations. However, while multigene germline panels have been extensively performed for BC female patients, the rarity of MBC has resulted in limited data to allow the understanding of the magnitude of risk and the contribution of recently identified moderate penetrance genes of FBC for MBC predisposition. This review gathers available data about the germline genetic landscape of men affected by breast cancer, estimated risk associated with these genetic variants, and current guidelines for clinical management.

CHEK2 Germline Variants in Cancer Predisposition: Stalemate Rather than Checkmate

Germline alterations in many genes coding for proteins regulating DNA repair and DNA damage response (DDR) to DNA double-strand breaks (DDSB) have been recognized as pathogenic factors in hereditary cancer predisposition. The ATM-CHEK2-p53 axis has been documented as a backbone for DDR and hypothesized as a barrier against cancer initiation. However, although CHK2 kinase coded by the CHEK2 gene expedites the DDR signal, its function in activation of p53-dependent cell cycle arrest is dispensable. CHEK2 mutations rank among the most frequent germline alterations revealed by germline genetic testing for various hereditary cancer predispositions, but their interpretation is not trivial. From the perspective of interpretation of germline CHEK2 variants, we review the current knowledge related to the structure of the CHEK2 gene, the function of CHK2 kinase, and the clinical significance of CHEK2 germline mutations in patients with hereditary breast, prostate, kidney, thyroid, and colon cancers.

Comprehensive analysis and ACMG-based classification of CHEK2 variants in hereditary cancer patients

CHEK2 variants are associated with intermediate breast cancer risk, among other cancers. We aimed to comprehensively describe CHEK2 variants in a Spanish hereditary cancer (HC) cohort and adjust the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG-AMP) guidelines for their classification. First, three CHEK2 frequent variants were screened in a retrospective Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer cohort of 516 patients. After, the whole CHEK2 coding region was analyzed by next-generation sequencing in 1848 prospective patients with HC suspicion. We refined ACMG-AMP criteria and applied different combined rules to classify CHEK2 variants and define risk alleles. We identified 10 CHEK2 null variants, 6 missense variants with discordant interpretation in ClinVar database, and 35 additional variants of unknown significance. Twelve variants were classified as (likely)-pathogenic; two can also be considered "established risk-alleles" and one as "likely risk-allele." The prevalence of (likely)-pathogenic variants in the HC cohort was 0.8% (1.3% in breast cancer patients and 1.0% in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer patients). Here, we provide ACMG adjustment guidelines to classify CHEK2 variants. We hope that this study would be useful for variant classification of other genes with low effect variants.

Bilateral Disease Common Among Slovenian CHEK2-Positive Breast Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

Currently, data on pathogenic variants in the CHEK2 gene and their impact on cancer risk are lacking. This study aimed to explore the characteristics of breast cancer (BC) patients from families with CHEK2 pathogenic variants in Slovenia.

METHODS

In the years 2014 to 2019, CHEK2 pathogenic variants/likely pathogenic variants (PV/LPVs) were found in probands from 50 different families who underwent genetic counseling and testing using a multigene panel at the authors' institution. Altogether, the study enrolled 75 individuals from 50 CHEK2 families who were carriers of a CHEK2 PV/LPV. The clinical data on 41 BC patients with CHEK2 PV/LPV and other carriers of CHEK2 PV/LPV from Slovenia were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Breast cancer was diagnosed in 41 of 75 CHEK2 PV/LPV carriers (40 females, 1 male). The mean age at BC diagnosis was 42.8 years (range, 21-63 years), and 27 (65.8%) of the 41 of patients with BC had a positive family history for BC. Contralateral BC (CBC) was observed in 8 (19.5%) of the 41 patients (mean age, 55.6 years). Of 12 patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive tumor type, a c.444+1G > A PV/LPV was detected in 4 patients, c.349A > G in 3 patients, deletion of exons 9-10 in 3 patients, deletion of exon 8 in 1 patient, and c.1427C > T PV/LPV in 1 patient.

CONCLUSION

Bilateral BC was diagnosed in as many as 19.5% of the Slovenian BC patients with CHEK2 PV/LPVs. Breast cancer associated with a germline CHEK2 PV/LPV occurs in younger patients compared with sporadic BC.

Skin cancer risk in CHEK2 mutation carriers

CHEK2 mutations have been linked with an increased risk of breast cancer. A unique challenge for oncodermatologists and oncologists is in the monitoring and counselling of patients regarding skin cancer risk due to CHEK2 mutation carrier status. In this review, we highlight current information in the literature on the risk of melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancers in CHEK2 mutation carriers. On the molecular level, CHEK2 is a cell cycle regulator that has been linked to cancer pathogenesis, though evidence from clinical studies regarding skin cancer risk has been inconsistent and conflicting. For melanoma, one study has demonstrated a statistically significant twofold risk of melanoma in individuals with CHEK2 mutations, particularly the CHEK2*1100delC variant. Five other studies did not show an association. For non-melanoma skin cancer, fewer data exist, with one prevalence study of CHEK2 mutations in a cohort of patients with basal cell carcinomas. Although there are currently no known studies of CHEK2 and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), data from other disciplines associating CHEK2 with head and neck SCCs are emerging. Overall, while there is currently not enough evidence to make conclusive statements regarding increased risk of melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancers in CHEK2 carriers, a molecular mechanism associating the mutation with cutaneous malignancy pathogenesis is evident, and further work is needed. Patient with CHEK2 mutations may benefit from screening dermatologic examinations with particular attention to skin cancers.

Breast cancer

Breast cancer is the most frequent malignancy in women worldwide and is curable in ~70-80% of patients with early-stage, non-metastatic disease. Advanced breast cancer with distant organ metastases is considered incurable with currently available therapies. On the molecular level, breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease; molecular features include activation of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2, encoded by ERBB2), activation of hormone receptors (oestrogen receptor and progesterone receptor) and/or BRCA mutations. Treatment strategies differ according to molecular subtype. Management of breast cancer is multidisciplinary; it includes locoregional (surgery and radiation therapy) and systemic therapy approaches. Systemic therapies include endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive disease, chemotherapy, anti-HER2 therapy for HER2-positive disease, bone stabilizing agents, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors for BRCA mutation carriers and, quite recently, immunotherapy. Future therapeutic concepts in breast cancer aim at individualization of therapy as well as at treatment de-escalation and escalation based on tumour biology and early therapy response. Next to further treatment innovations, equal worldwide access to therapeutic advances remains the global challenge in breast cancer care for the future.

A novel CHEK2 variant identified by next generation sequencing in an Indian family with hereditary breast cancer syndrome

Genetic variations in CHEK2 (checkpoint kinase 2) gene have been associated with hereditary predisposition to various cancers including breast and ovarian cancer. CHEK2 tumor suppressor gene encodes for a checkpoint kinase that responds to breaks in DNA, regulates DNA repair and cellular proliferation. We report a BRCA negative family with multiple affected women having breast cancer, with a novel, missense, likely pathogenic variant in the CHEK2 gene (c.1376T>G; p.Ile459Ser) that segregated with subjects with breast cancer. This case provides insight into the role of the CHEK2 gene in causing breast cancer susceptibility in families and supports the use of multigene panel testing in cases with hereditary predisposition to breast cancer.

Identification of deleterious germline CHEK2 mutations and their association with breast and ovarian cancer

Germline mutations in checkpoint kinase 2 (CHEK2), a multiple cancer-predisposing gene, increase breast cancer (BC) risk; however, risk estimates differ substantially in published studies. We analyzed germline CHEK2 variants in 1,928 high-risk Czech breast/ovarian cancer (BC/OC) patients and 3,360 population-matched controls (PMCs). For a functional classification of VUS, we developed a complementation assay in human nontransformed RPE1-CHEK2-knockout cells quantifying CHK2-specific phosphorylation of endogenous protein KAP1. We identified 10 truncations in 46 (2.39%) patients and in 11 (0.33%) PMC (p = 1.1 × 10^-14 ). Two types of large intragenic rearrangements (LGR) were found in 20/46 mutation carriers. Truncations significantly increased unilateral BC risk (OR = 7.94; 95%CI 3.90-17.47; p = 1.1 × 10^-14 ) and were more frequent in patients with bilateral BC (4/149; 2.68%; p = 0.003), double primary BC/OC (3/79; 3.80%; p = 0.004), male BC (3/48; 6.25%; p = 8.6 × 10^-4 ), but not with OC (3/354; 0.85%; p = 0.14). Additionally, we found 26 missense VUS in 88 (4.56%) patients and 131 (3.90%) PMC (p = 0.22). Using our functional assay, 11 variants identified in 15 (0.78%) patients and 6 (0.18%) PMC were scored deleterious (p = 0.002). Frequencies of functionally intermediate and neutral variants did not differ between patients and PMC. Functionally deleterious CHEK2 missense variants significantly increased BC risk (OR = 3.90; 95%CI 1.24-13.35; p = 0.009) and marginally OC risk (OR = 4.77; 95%CI 0.77-22.47; p = 0.047); however, carriers low frequency will require evaluation in larger studies. Our study highlights importance of LGR detection for CHEK2 analysis, careful consideration of ethnicity in both cases and controls for risk estimates, and demonstrates promising potential of newly developed human nontransformed cell line assay for functional CHEK2 VUS classification.

Male breast cancer: a disease distinct from female breast cancer

PURPOSE

Male breast cancer (BC) is rare, representing approximately 1% of cancers that occur in men and approximately 1% of all BCs worldwide. Because male BC is rare, not much is known about the disease, and treatment recommendations are typically extrapolated from data available from clinical trials enrolling female BC patients.

METHODS

We review the epidemiology, risk factors, prognosis, and the varied molecular and clinicopathologic features that characterize male BC. In addition, we summarize the available data for the use of systemic therapy in the treatment of male BC and explore the ongoing development of targeted therapeutic agents for the treatment of this subgroup of BCs.

RESULTS

There are important biological differences between male and female BC. Male BC is almost exclusively hormone receptor positive (+), including the androgen receptor (AR), and is associated with an increased prevalence of BRCA2 germline mutations, especially in men with increased risk for developing high-risk BC. Additional research is warranted to better characterize male BC. To accomplish this, a multi-national consortium approach, such as the International Male Breast Cancer Program, is needed in response to the scarcity of patients. This approach allows the pooling of information from a large number of men with BC and the creation of registries for future therapeutic-focused clinical trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the unique biology of BC in men, promising new therapeutic targets are currently under investigation, including the use of poly-ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors or AR-targeted agents either as monotherapy or in combination with other agents.