COVID-19 Vaccine Efficacy and Immunogenicity in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients and Kidney Transplant Recipients

Impact of cultural diversity on COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy in kidney transplant recipients

AIM

To study COVID-19 vaccination status in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), reasons for incomplete vaccination and the clinical impact of vaccination on patient outcomes.

METHODS

A single-centre retrospective analysis of KTR (n = 543) conducted between 1970 and December 2022. Data included baseline demographics, number of vaccinations, reason for incomplete vaccination and patient outcomes following COVID-19 infection. A completed course of COVID-19 vaccination was defined as four or more vaccine doses.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

those deceased prior December 2019, managed by another health service, failed graft, or deceased secondary to non-COVID cause.

RESULTS

273 of 543 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 58.1 ± 12.2 years, 66% were male. 58.2% of patients were fully vaccinated, 22.7% received three doses, 7.7% received two doses, 0.7% received one dose, 0.7% received zero doses, and 10% incomplete records. The most common reasons for incomplete vaccination were COVID-19 infection, concern for side effects, and patient unawareness of booster recommendations. Vaccination uptake was greater in Australian born patients compared with those born overseas, odds ratio 0.40 (95% CI 0.23-0.69). KTR with incomplete vaccination had poorer outcomes, higher rate of AKI, long COVID, and increased hospitalization.

CONCLUSION

The majority of KTR were fully vaccinated. KTR with incomplete vaccination status had poorer outcomes with COVID-19 infection and other issues. Patient education is a major area for improvement targeting patients born overseas and better information regarding side effects. Potential interventions need to address improved communication, cultural relevancy, and language.

Vaccination against COVID-19 among healthcare workers as a cocoon strategy for people living with HIV

Introduction

Healthcare professionals working in infectious disease units are often engaged in the care of patients with HIV infection. A cocoon vaccination strategy may protect those who are immunocompromised from a severe course of COVID-19.

Methods

The research was conducted between January 2021 and June 2022. The study participants were 450 healthcare workers (HCWs) from the Hospital for Infectious Diseases in Warsaw who were vaccinated against COVID-19 with the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech) -, thefirst available type of vaccine in Poland. Sera were collected according to the schedule of the study. Statistical analyses were performed with non-parametric tests: Wilcoxon's test was used to compare dependent numerical variables, and Fisher's exact test and the Chi-squared test to compare categorical variables. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Among the 450 HCWs working in the Hospital for Infectious Diseases in Warsaw 412 (91,5 %) were vaccinated against COVID-19. In total 170 (41,3 %) vaccinated HCWs were included in the final analysis. Their median age was 51 years [interquartile range (IQR): 41-60 years] and median body mass index (BMI) was 25.10 [IQR: 22.68-29.03]. Most of the cohort consisted of women (n = 137, 80.59 %), with the majority working directly with patients (n = 137, 73.21 %). It was found that as early as 14 days after the second dose of the vaccine, 100 % of the study participants achieved a positive result for SARS CoV-2 S-RBD antibodies. There were 168 subjects who had had a COVID-19 diagnosis before entering study and after vaccination 65 HCWs was diagnosed with COVID-19.

Conclusions

Due to the fact that people living with HIV with severe immunodeficiency may have an incomplete immune response to COVID vaccination and be at risk of a severe course of the disease, the cocoon strategy of vaccinating medical personnel may be beneficial for these patients.

Lack of vitamin D predicts impaired long-term immune response to COVID-19 vaccination

PURPOSE

Low vitamin D levels were reported to negatively influence the outcome of acute COVID-19, as well as to be linked to Long-COVID. However, few studies have investigated, so far, its effects on humoral-response to anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, reporting conflicting results. We aimed to evaluate the impact of baseline 25(OH)vitamin D (25(OH)D) levels on humoral-response to a two-dose cycle of Pfizer-BioNTech-vaccine up to 9-10 months after immunization.

METHODS

We retrospectively included 119 consecutive healthcare-workers (median age 53 years) without a previous history of acute COVID-19 or anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulins presence immunized with two doses of Comirnaty-vaccine from January to February 2021. 25(OH)D was measured at time of first-immunization. Immune response was evaluated at: time 0 (T0), before the first-dose; T1, time of second-dose (21 days after T0); T2, T3, T4 at 1, 5 and 9 months after T1, respectively.

RESULTS

Median 25(OH)D levels were 25.6 ng/mL, and vitamin D deficiency (25(OH)D <20 ng/mL) was observed in 29 subjects (24.8%). In those with vitamin D deficiency, we found a non-significant trend towards lower antibody-titers at T3, and significantly lower titers at T4 as compared to those not vitamin D-deficient, also observing a more pronounced antibody-titers negative drop from peak-T2 and T4 in those with vitamin D deficiency. A positive correlation between 25(OH)D levels and antibody-titers at T4 (p = 0.043) was found. In multiple linear-regression analysis, 25(OH)D deficiency and older-age resulted as negative independent factors associated with antibody titer at T4 (p = 0.026, p = 0.004; respectively).

CONCLUSION

In our relatively young cohort presenting low prevalence of hypovitaminosis D, the long-term humoral response to anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was negatively influenced by low baseline 25(OH)D. Vitamin D supplementation could be tested as a strategy to optimize the vaccination campaigns to prevent severe COVID-19.

Severity of COVID-19 Pneumonia in Kidney Transplant Recipients According to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination

We reviewed 24 kidney transplantat recipients (KTRs) who had radiologically confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia. Enrolled KTRs were divided into a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-vaccination (+) group (n = 18) and a vaccination (-) group (n = 6). Clinical outcomes of the two groups including death, pulmonary outcome, and renal outcome were compared. COVID-19 pneumonia was worse in vaccination (-) KTRs. Two out of six vaccination (-) KTRs needed continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and mechanical ventilator (MV) and expired. In contrast, only one KTR expired and required CRRT and MV out of 18 vaccination (+) KTRs. Our results suggest that SARS-CoV-2 vaccination attenuates severity of COVID-19 pneumonia in KTRs.

Anti-staphylococcus aureus adaptive immunity is impaired in end-stage renal disease patients on hemodialysis: one-year longitudinal study

Introduction

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) display defects in adaptive and innate immunity, increasing susceptibility to infection. Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is a major cause of bacteraemia in this population and is associated with increased mortality. More information on the immune response to S. aureus in these patients is needed to inform effective vaccine development.

Methods

A longitudinal prospective study was carried out at two medical centers and included 48 ESRD patients who started chronic hemodialysis (HD) treatment ≤3 months before inclusion. Control samples were taken from 62 consenting healthy blood donors. Blood samples were obtained from ESRD patients at each visit, on month (M) 0 (beginning of HD), M6 and M12. Around 50 immunological markers of adaptive and innate immunity were assessed to compare immune responses to S. aureus in ESRD patients versus controls to document the changes on their immune profile during HD.

Results

S. aureus survival in whole blood was significantly higher in ESRD patients than in controls at M0 (P=0.049), while impaired oxidative burst activity was observed in ESRD patients at all timepoints (P<0.001). S. aureus-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) responses to iron surface determinant B (IsdB) and S. aureus α hemolysin (Hla) antigens were lower in ESRD patients than in healthy donors at M0 (P=0.003 and P=0.007, respectively) and M6 (P=0.05 and P=0.03, respectively), but were restored to control levels at M12. Moreover, S. aureus-specific T-helper cell responses were comparable to controls for IsdB but were impaired for Hla antigen at all timepoints: 10% of ESRD patients responded to Hla at M0, increasing to 30% at M12, compared with 45% of healthy donors. B-cell and T-cell concentrations in blood were significantly reduced (by 60% and 40%, respectively) compared with healthy controls. Finally, upregulation of Human Leucocyte Antigen-DR (HLA-DR) and C-C chemokine Receptor type 2 (CCR2) was impaired at M0 but was restored during the first year of HD.

Conclusion

All together, these results show that adaptive immunity was largely impaired in ESRD patients, whereas innate immunity was less impacted and tended to be restored by HD.

The Impact and Treatment of COVID-19 in Hemodialysis Patients

BACKGROUND

Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) undergoing maintenance hemodialysis have a poor prognosis and limited treatment options.

METHODS

This paper outlines the impact of COVID-19, its treatment, and the efficacy of vaccines in Japanese patients undergoing hemodialysis with a review of the literature.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing dialysis in dialysis facilities are at greater risk of exposure to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 than the general population due to limited isolation capabilities. Therefore, vaccines are expected to be effective for patients undergoing dialysis. In addition, effective use of available medications is important because treatment options are limited.

CONCLUSIONS

Efforts should be made to prevent the spread of the infection to high-risk patients undergoing dialysis while ensuring the effective use of vaccines.

SARS-CoV-2 IgG spike protein antibody response in mRNA-1273 Moderna® vaccinated patients on maintenance immunoapheresis – a cohort study

Background

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic increased mortality and morbidity among immunocompromised populations. Vaccination is the most important preventive measure, however, its effectiveness among patients depending on maintenance immunoglobulin G (IgG) apheresis to control autoimmune disease activity is unknown. We aimed to examine the humoral immune response after mRNA-1273 Moderna^® vaccination in immunoapheresis patients.

Methods

We prospectively monitored SARS-CoV-2 IgG spike (S) protein antibody levels before and after each IgG (exposure) or lipid (LDL) apheresis (controls) over 12 weeks and once after 24 weeks. Primary outcome was the difference of change of SARS-CoV-2 IgG S antibody levels from vaccination until week 12, secondary outcome was the difference of change of SARS-CoV-2 IgG S antibody levels by apheresis treatments across groups.

Results

We included 6 IgG and 18 LDL apheresis patients. After 12 weeks the median SARS-CoV-2 IgG S antibody level was 115 (IQR: 0.74, 258) in the IgG and 1216 (IQR: 788, 2178) in the LDL group (p=0.03). Median SARS-CoV-2 IgG S antibody reduction by apheresis was 76.4 vs. 23.7% in the IgG and LDL group (p=0.04). The average post- vs. pre-treatment SARS-CoV-2 IgG S antibody rebound in the IgG group vs. the LDL group was 46.1 and 6.44%/week from prior until week 12 visit.

Conclusions

IgG apheresis patients had lower SARS-CoV-2 IgG S antibody levels compared to LDL apheresis patients, but recovered appropriately between treatment sessions. We believe that IgG apheresis itself probably has less effect on maintaining the immune response compared to concomitant immunosuppressive drugs. Immunization is recommended independent of apheresis treatment.

Immunogenicity and safety of two-dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccination via different platforms in kidney transplantation recipients

After kidney transplantation, patients exhibit a poor response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination. However, the efficacy and adverse effects of vaccines based on different platforms in these patients remain unclear. We prospectively analyzed both anti-spike protein antibody and cellular responses 1 month after the first and second doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in 171 kidney transplant patients. Four vaccines, including one viral vector (ChAdOx1 nCov-19, n = 30), two mRNA (mRNA1273, n = 81 and BNT162b2, n = 38), and one protein subunit (MVC-COV1901, n = 22) vaccines were administered. Among the four vaccines, mRNA1273 elicited the strongest humoral response and induced the highest interferon-γ levels in patients with a positive cellular response against the spike protein. Antiproliferative agents were negatively associated with both the antibody and cellular responses. A transient elevation in creatinine levels was noted in approximately half of the patients after the first dose of mRNA1273 or ChadOx1, and only one of them presented with borderline cellular rejection without definite causality to vaccination. In conclusion, mRNA1273 had better immunogenicity than the other vaccines. Further, renal function needs to be carefully monitored after vaccination, and vaccination strategies should be tailored according to the transplant status and vaccine characteristics.

COVID-19 and Kidney Transplantation: Epidemiology, Histopathological Presentation, Clinical Presentation and Outcomes, and Therapeutic Strategies

Multiple case series of kidney transplant recipients with COVID-19 have shown increased mortality compared to nontransplant patients. To date, we do not have high-level evidence to inform immunosuppression minimization strategies in infected transplant recipients. Most centers, however, have adopted an early antimetabolite withdrawal in addition to other interventions. The epidemiological problem concerns also dialysis patients and waitlisted patients who have a higher COVID-19 infection diffusion with respect to kidney transplant recipients. Several factors influence mortality among kidney transplant recipients. Among these factors are the age, race, and comorbidity factors, such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, obesity, and previous respiratory problems. Treatment is still limited. The only effective antiviral drug is remdesivir that should be administered before the development of the cytokine storm. Vaccination seems to be useful, but due to the concomitant immunosuppression limiting its efficacy, at least three or four doses should be administered.