Homelessness and Addiction: Causes, Consequences and Interventions

Resilience and Challenges Among Women With Histories of Addiction and Victimization Newly Admitted to a Sober Living Home: A Brief Report

This study examined strengths (i.e., empowerment, purpose) and challenges (i.e., depressive and posttraumatic stress disorder symptomatology, financial and housing worries) experienced by women (N = 44) with histories of addiction and victimization newly admitted to a sober living home (SLH). Women had moderate to high levels of both strengths and challenges. In general, strengths and challenges were inversely related (e.g., higher purpose was related to lower depression), and challenges were positively related (e.g., higher financial worries were related to higher posttraumatic stress symptoms). The findings remind us that women entering SLHs have myriad needs and that comprehensive services drawing upon women's resilience are needed.

Assessing psychosocial distress associated with homelessness in Ghana: A springboard for interventional policy design

This study investigated the causes of homelessness in Ghana and associated psychosocial distress. A sample of 86 homeless participants listed perceived causes of their homelessness and completed measures of psychosocial distress, and 97 non-homeless participants completed the same measures psychosocial distress. Causes of homelessness among the participants included poverty (30.1%), migration (10.4%), unemployment (2.2%), parental demise (2.2%), parental neglect (0.5%), and parental divorce (0.5%). Multivariate analysis revealed higher psychosocial distress among the homeless than the non-homeless. Homeless females reported higher levels of stress and suicidality than their male counterparts. The study demonstrates the need for timely and effective implementation of interventions such as provision of affordable housing, financial assistance, job-creation, and skill training for the homeless directly related to known causes of homelessness and accounting for gender differences.

Exploring the experiences of clients receiving opioid use disorder treatment at a methadone clinic in Kenya: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Assessing the experiences of individuals on methadone treatment is essential to help evaluate the treatment program's effectiveness. This study aimed to explore the experiences of patients receiving methadone treatment at a clinic in Nairobi, Kenya.

METHOD

This study employed an exploratory qualitative study design. Through purposive sampling, participants were enrolled from individuals attending a methadone clinic for at least 2 years. Semi-structured individual interviews were used to collect data on substance use and experience before methadone treatment and experiences after starting methadone treatment, including benefits and challenges. Interviews were transcribed, and NVIVO 12 software was used to code the data using the preidentified analytical framework. Thematic analyses were utilized to identify cross-cutting themes between these two data sets. Seventeen participants were enrolled.

RESULTS

Seventeen participants were enrolled comprising 70% males, with age range from 23 to 49 years and more than half had secondary education. The interview data analysis identified four themes, namely: (a) the impact of opioid use before starting treatment which included adverse effects on health, legal problems and family dysfunction; (b) learning about methadone treatment whereby the majority were referred from community linkage programs, family and friends; (c) experiences with care at the methadone treatment clinic which included benefits such as improved health, family reintegration and stigma reduction; and (d) barriers to optimal methadone treatment such as financial constraints.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study show that clients started methadone treatment due to the devastating impact of opioid use disorder on their lives. Methadone treatment allowed them to regain their lives from the adverse effects of opioid use disorder. Additionally, challenges such as financial constraints while accessing treatment were reported. These findings can help inform policies to improve the impact of methadone treatment.

Living With Dual Diagnosis and Homelessness: Marginalized Within a Marginalized Group

Objective: Concurrent mental and substance use disorders or dual diagnosis are highly prevalent among individuals experiencing homelessness. Studies have indicated that dual diagnosis leads to poorer health outcomes and higher health service utilization among those affected. This study aims to estimate the prevalence of dual diagnoses among homeless populations in British Columbia (BC), Canada, and understand their characteristics and specific factors associated with dual diagnoses. Methods: The BC Health of the Homeless Survey is a cross-sectional study involving the homeless population of three cities in BC. The survey assessed addiction and concurrent disorders with standardized interviews-the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview Plus, the Maudsley Addiction Profile, and the Brief Symptom Inventory-in a sample of 500 individuals who are homeless living in shelters or on the street. We characterized individuals after categorizing them into four groups: those without any current mental disorder, those with substance use disorders only, those with mental disorders only, and those with concurrent substance use and mental disorders. Focusing on the concurrent disorder group, we completed a multivariate analysis comparing individuals with dual diagnosis to those without concurrent disorders. Results: Consistent with previous studies, we found that individuals with dual diagnoses report more severe physical and psychological symptoms. Among the homeless, they were more likely to be Aboriginal and younger and more likely to not make it into a shelter. They also reported substantially more difficulties in getting the health care service that they need. Conclusions: Within this marginalized group, individuals with dual diagnosis were more likely to be from groups considered to be more vulnerable with more complex needs. They were having more problems accessing even basic support, such as shelters and health care. Without a systematic approach in providing appropriate care to individuals with dual diagnosis, the most vulnerable clients are not only the ones likely to suffer the most but also the ones having the most problems meeting their basic needs.

Effects of comorbid substance use disorders on outcomes in a Housing First intervention for homeless people with mental illness

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Evidence supports the effectiveness of Housing First (HF) programmes for people who are experiencing homelessness and mental illness; however, questions remain about its use in people with comorbid substance use disorders (SUD). The aim of this project was to test whether SUD modifies the effectiveness of an HF intervention.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial of HF versus treatment-as-usual (TAU) with 24-month follow-up, comparing those with and without SUD at trial entry.

SETTING

Vancouver, Toronto, Winnipeg, Moncton and Montreal, Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 2154 participants recruited from 2009 to 2013 and randomized to HF versus TAU (67% male, mean age 40.8 ± 11.2, 25% ethno-cultural minority). All were homeless and had a mental disorder at baseline; 35% reported symptoms consistent with SUD.

INTERVENTION

Housing paired with Intensive Case Management or Assertive Community Treatment.

MEASUREMENTS

Primary outcomes were days housed and community functioning. Secondary outcomes were general and health-related quality of life and mental health symptoms. Predictors were SUD status crossed with intervention group (HF versus TAU).

FINDINGS

People with SUD in both the HF and TAU groups spent less time in stable housing, but the effect of HF did not vary by SUD status [odds ratio (OR) = 1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.77, 1.76]. Similarly, there was no difference between those with and without SUD in the effect of HF (over TAU) on community functioning (b = 0.75, 95% CI = -0.36, 1.87), quality of life (b = -1.27, 95% CI = -4.17, 1.63), health-related quality of life (b = -0.01, 95% CI = -0.03, 0.02) or mental health symptoms (b = 0.43, 95% CI = -0.99, 1.86).

CONCLUSIONS

Housing First programs in Canada are equally effective in people with and without comorbid substance use disorder (SUD). Overall, the intervention appears to be able to engage people with SUD and is reasonably successful at housing them, without housing being contingent upon abstinence or treatment.