1
|
Bandi P, Star J, Ashad-Bishop K, Kratzer T, Smith R, Jemal A. Lung Cancer Screening in the US, 2022. JAMA Intern Med 2024; 184:882-891. [PMID: 38856988 PMCID: PMC11165414 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.1655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024]
Abstract
Importance The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends annual lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose computed tomography in high-risk individuals (age 50-80 years, ≥20 pack-years currently smoking or formerly smoked, and quit <15 years ago) for early detection of LC. However, representative state-level LCS data are unavailable nationwide. Objective To estimate the contemporary prevalence of up-to-date (UTD) LCS in the US nationwide and across the 50 states and the District of Columbia. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study used data from the 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) population-based, nationwide, state-representative survey for respondents aged 50 to 79 years who were eligible for LCS according to the 2021 USPSTF eligibility criteria. Data analysis was performed from October 1, 2023, to March 20, 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcome was self-reported UTD-LCS (defined as past-year) prevalence according to the 2021 USPSTF eligibility criteria in respondents aged 50 to 79 years. Adjusted prevalence ratios (APRs) and 95% CIs compared differences. Results Among 25 958 sample respondents eligible for LCS (median [IQR] age, 62 [11] years), 61.5% reported currently smoking, 54.4% were male, 64.4% were aged 60 years or older, and 53.0% had a high school education or less. The UTD-LCS prevalence was 18.1% overall, but varied across states (range, 9.7%-31.0%), with relatively lower levels in southern states characterized by high LC mortality burden. The UTD-LCS prevalence increased with age (50-54 years: 6.7%; 70-79 years: 27.1%) and number of comorbidities (≥3: 24.6%; none: 8.7%). A total of 3.7% of those without insurance and 5.1% of those without a usual source of care were UTD with LCS, but state-level Medicaid expansions (APR, 2.68; 95% CI, 1.30-5.53) and higher screening capacity levels (high vs low: APR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.36-2.75) were associated with higher UTD-LCS prevalence. Conclusions and Relevance This study of data from the 2022 BRFSS found that the overall prevalence of UTD-LCS was low. Disparities were largest according to health care access and geographically across US states, with low prevalence in southern states with high LC burden. The findings suggest that state-based initiatives to expand access to health care and screening facilities may be associated with improved LCS rates and reduced disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priti Bandi
- Surveillance & Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jessica Star
- Surveillance & Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Kilan Ashad-Bishop
- Surveillance & Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Tyler Kratzer
- Surveillance & Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Robert Smith
- Center for Cancer Screening, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Ahmedin Jemal
- Surveillance & Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mu H, Yang X, Li Y, Zhou B, Liu L, Zhang M, Wang Q, Chen Q, Yan L, Sun W, Pan G. Three-year follow-up study reveals improved survival rate in NSCLC patients underwent guideline-concordant diagnosis and treatment. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1382197. [PMID: 38863625 PMCID: PMC11165022 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1382197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Background No studies in China have assessed the guideline-concordance level of the first-course of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) diagnosis and treatment and its relationship with survival. This study comprehensively assesses the current status of guideline-concordant diagnosis (GCD) and guideline-concordant treatment (GCT) of NSCLC in China and explores its impact on survival. Methods First course diagnosis and treatment data for NSCLC patients in Liaoning, China in 2017 and 2018 (n=1828) were used and classified by whether they underwent GCD and GCT according to Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) guidelines. Pearson's chi-squared test was used to determine unadjusted associations between categorical variables of interest. Logistic models were constructed to identify variables associated with GCD and GCT. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests were used to estimate and compare 3-year survival rates. Multivariate Cox proportional risk models were constructed to assess the risk of cancer mortality associated with guideline-concordant diagnosis and treatment. Results Of the 1828 patients we studied, 48.1% underwent GCD, and 70.1% underwent GCT. The proportions of patients who underwent both GCD and GCT, GCD alone, GCT alone and neither GCD nor GCT were 36.7%, 11.4%, 33.5% and 18.4%, respectively. Patients in advanced stage and non-oncology hospitals were significantly less likely to undergo GCD and GCT. Compared with those who underwent neither GCD nor GCT, patients who underwent both GCD and GCT, GCD alone and GCT alone had 35.2%, 26.7% and 35.7% higher 3-year survival rates; the adjusted lung cancer mortality risk significantly decreased by 29% (adjusted hazard ratio[aHR], 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53-0.95), 29% (aHR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.50-1.00) and 32% (aHR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.51-0.90). Conclusion The 3-year risk of death is expected to be reduced by 29% if patients with NSCLC undergo both GCD and GCT. There is a need to establish an oncology diagnosis and treatment data management platform in China to monitor, evaluate, and promote the use of clinical practice guidelines in healthcare settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huijuan Mu
- Institute of Preventive Medicine, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Institute of Chronic Diseases, Liaoning Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenyang, China
| | - Xing Yang
- Institute of Preventive Medicine, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Research Center for Universal Health, School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Yanxia Li
- Institute of Chronic Diseases, Liaoning Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenyang, China
| | - Bingzheng Zhou
- Research Center for Universal Health, School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Li Liu
- Institute of Preventive Medicine, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Institute of Chronic Diseases, Liaoning Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shenyang, China
| | - Minmin Zhang
- Institute of Preventive Medicine, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Research Center for Universal Health, School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Qihao Wang
- Institute of Preventive Medicine, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Research Center for Universal Health, School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Qian Chen
- Institute of Preventive Medicine, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Research Center for Universal Health, School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Lingjun Yan
- Institute of Preventive Medicine, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Research Center for Universal Health, School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Wei Sun
- Institute of Preventive Medicine, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Research Center for Universal Health, School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Guowei Pan
- Institute of Preventive Medicine, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- Research Center for Universal Health, School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Posado-Domínguez L, Figuero-Pérez L, Olivares-Hernández A, Fonseca-Sánchez E. No one writes to the colonel. Semergen 2024; 50:102173. [PMID: 38301391 DOI: 10.1016/j.semerg.2023.102173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- L Posado-Domínguez
- University Hospital of Salamanca, Medical Oncology Department, Salamanca, Castilla-León, Spain.
| | - L Figuero-Pérez
- University Hospital of Salamanca, Medical Oncology Department, Salamanca, Castilla-León, Spain
| | - A Olivares-Hernández
- University Hospital of Salamanca, Medical Oncology Department, Salamanca, Castilla-León, Spain
| | - E Fonseca-Sánchez
- University Hospital of Salamanca, Medical Oncology Department, Salamanca, Castilla-León, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Williams RM, Whealan J, Taylor KL, Adams-Campbell L, Miller KE, Foley K, Luta G, Brandt H, Glassmeyer K, Sangraula A, Yee P, Camidge K, Blumenthal J, Modi S, Kratz H. Multilevel approaches to address disparities in lung cancer screening: a study protocol. Implement Sci Commun 2024; 5:15. [PMID: 38365820 PMCID: PMC10870584 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-024-00553-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low-dose computed tomography (lung cancer screening) can reduce lung cancer-specific mortality by 20-24%. Based on this evidence, the United States Preventive Services Task Force recommends annual lung cancer screening for asymptomatic high-risk individuals. Despite this recommendation, utilization is low (3-20%). Lung cancer screening may be particularly beneficial for African American patients because they are more likely to have advanced disease, lower survival, and lower screening rates compared to White individuals. Evidence points to multilevel approaches that simultaneously address multiple determinants to increase screening rates and decrease lung cancer burden in minoritized populations. This study will test the effects of provider- and patient-level strategies for promoting equitable lung cancer screening utilization. METHODS Guided by the Health Disparities Research Framework and the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model, we will conduct a quasi-experimental study with four primary care clinics within a large health system (MedStar Health). Individuals eligible for lung cancer screening, defined as 50-80 years old, ≥ 20 pack-years, currently smoking, or quit < 15 years, no history of lung cancer, who have an appointment scheduled with their provider, and who are non-adherent to screening will be identified via the EHR, contacted, and enrolled (N = 184 for implementation clinics, N = 184 for comparison clinics; total N = 368). Provider participants will include those practicing at the partner clinics (N = 26). To increase provider-prompted discussions about lung screening, an electronic health record (EHR) clinician reminder will be sent to providers prior to scheduled visits with the screening-eligible participants. To increase patient-level knowledge and patient activation about screening, an inreach specialist will conduct a pre-visit phone-based educational session with participants. Patient participants will be assessed at baseline and 1-week post-visit to measure provider-patient discussion, screening intentions, and knowledge. Screening referrals and screening completion rates will be assessed via the EHR at 6 months. We will use mixed methods and multilevel assessments of patients and providers to evaluate the implementation outcomes (adoption, feasibility, acceptability, and fidelity). DISCUSSION The study will inform future work designed to measure the independent and overlapping contributions of the multilevel implementation strategies to advance equity in lung screening rates. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04675476. Registered December 19, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Randi M Williams
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
| | - Julia Whealan
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Kathryn L Taylor
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Lucile Adams-Campbell
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Kristie Foley
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - George Luta
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Heather Brandt
- Epidemiology and Cancer Control Department, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Katharine Glassmeyer
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Anu Sangraula
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Peyton Yee
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Kaylin Camidge
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | | | - Heather Kratz
- The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Robinson-Oghogho JN, Alcaraz KI, Thorpe RJ. Structural Racism as a Contributor to Lung Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates Among Black Populations in the United States. Cancer Control 2024; 31:10732748241248363. [PMID: 38698674 PMCID: PMC11067682 DOI: 10.1177/10732748241248363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2023] [Revised: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although racial disparities in lung cancer incidence and mortality have diminished in recent years, lung cancer remains the second most diagnosed cancer among US Black populations. Many factors contributing to disparities in lung cancer are rooted in structural racism. To quantify this relationship, we examined associations between a multidimensional measure of county-level structural racism and county lung cancer incidence and mortality rates among Black populations, while accounting for county levels of environmental quality. METHODS We merged 2016-2020 data from the United States Cancer Statistics Data Visualization Tool, a pre-existing county-level structural racism index, the Environmental Protection Agency's 2006-2010 Environmental Quality Index (EQI), 2023 County Health Rankings, and the 2021 United States Census American Community Survey. We conducted multivariable linear regressions to examine associations between county-level structural racism and county-level lung cancer incidence and mortality rates. RESULTS Among Black males and females, each standard deviation increase in county-level structural racism score was associated with an increase in county-level lung cancer incidence of 6.4 (95% CI: 4.4, 8.5) cases per 100,000 and an increase of 3.3 (95% CI: 2.0, 4.6) lung cancer deaths per 100,000. When examining these associations stratified by sex, larger associations between structural racism and lung cancer rates were observed among Black male populations than among Black females. CONCLUSION Structural racism contributes to both the number of new lung cancer cases and the number of deaths caused by lung cancer among Black populations. Those aiming to reduce lung cancer cases and deaths should consider addressing racism as a root-cause.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joelle N. Robinson-Oghogho
- Department of Health Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kassandra I. Alcaraz
- Hopkins Center for Health Disparities Solutions, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Roland J. Thorpe
- Department of Health Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Hopkins Center for Health Disparities Solutions, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|