What Score in WHODAS 2.0 12-Item Interviewer Version Corresponds to 40 % Psychiatric Disability? A Comparative Study Against IDEAS

ESSENCE: An Implementation Research Program to Scale Up Depression Care in Rural Communities

BACKGROUND

Task sharing may involve training nonspecialist health workers (NSHWs) to deliver brief mental health interventions. This approach is promising for reducing the global mental health treatment gap. However, capacity is limited for training large cadres of frontline workers in low- and middle-income countries, hindering uptake of these interventions at scale.

METHODS

The ESSENCE (enabling translation of science to service to enhance depression care) project in Madhya Pradesh, India, aims to address these challenges through two sequential randomized controlled trials. First, a training trial will evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of digital training, compared with conventional face-to-face training, in achieving clinical competency of NSHWs in delivering an intervention for depression. This initial trial will be followed by an implementation trial aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of a remote enhanced implementation support, compared with routine implementation support, in addressing barriers to delivery of depression care in primary care facilities.

RESULTS

This project involved developing and pilot testing a scalable smartphone-based program for training NSHWs to deliver a brief psychological intervention for depression screening. This initial research guided a randomized trial of a digital training approach with NSHWs to evaluate the effectiveness of this approach. This trial will be followed by a cluster-randomized trial to evaluate the effectiveness of remote implementation support in ensuring efficient delivery of depression care in primary care facilities.

NEXT STEPS

Findings from these trials may inform sustainable training and implementation support models to integrate depression care into primary care for scale-up in resource-constrained settings.

Characterization of an extreme phenotype of schizophrenia among women with homelessness

Background

Studies of schizophrenia and homelessness are often confounded by comorbid substance use. Women with schizophrenia and homelessness in India have very low rates of substance use and provide a unique opportunity to disentangle the effects of illness from that of substance use. We examined the clinical characteristics of women with schizophrenia and homelessness and compared it to an age-matched group of women with schizophrenia living with their family.

Methods

36 women with schizophrenia and homelessness, and 32 women with schizophrenia who were illness living with family were evaluated for psychopathology using Scale for Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS)/ Scale for assessment of negative symptoms (SANS) scales, cognitive difficulties using Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA)/Rowland Universal Dementia Scale (RUDAS), and Frontal Assessment Battery(FAB), disability using World Health Organization - Disability assessment Scale (WHO-DAS) and psychosocial factors using a semi-structured proforma. The groups were compared using t-tests and chi-square for continuous and categorical variables respectively.

Results

Women with schizophrenia and homelessness were found to have significantly higher scores on measures of psychopathology, significantly lower cognitive functioning, and much higher disability, and were also on higher doses of antipsychotics. The mean scores on measures of psychopathology, cognition and disability for women with schizophrenia and homelessness differed by 2-3 standard deviations with the mean for women living with family (i.e. z scores) suggesting that they represented an extreme phenotype. Rates of past employment were higher among women with schizophrenia and homelessness. Hence these differences were not accounted for by premorbid functioning.

Conclusions

The study raises the possibility of an extreme phenotype of schizophrenia with severe and persistent psychopathology non-responsive to dopamine blocking drugs, cognitive impairment, and disability, which needs further exploration.

Cutoff for Benchmark Disability Using World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0: A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study from Rural South India

Background

India uses the Indian Disability Evaluation and Assessment Scale (IDEAS) for quantifying disability due to mental illness. The cutoff score for benchmark disability is 7. India has adopted International Classification of Functioning and Health (ICF) and thereby is a signatory to use World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS). Cutoff for benchmark disability in WHODAS in a community-based sample is lacking.

Methods

The study was conducted in Jagaluru Taluk, Davanagere District, Karnataka. It is a part of an ongoing research funded by Indian Council of Medical Research. Frequency, percentages, mean, standard deviations, mode, median, Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve were used in analyzing the data.

Results

The study included 184 persons with severe mental illness with mean age of 47 and average duration of illness (DOI) of 11 years. They had mild disability (5.99) in IDEAS. The corresponding cutoff score in WHODAS, as compared to IDEAS, when the influence of DOI is removed was 24.

Conclusions

A shift from IDEAS to WHODAS is feasible. With the undue influence of DOI removed, both hospital and community-based samples show the score of 24 as cutoff.

Care at door-steps for persons with severe mental disorders: A pilot experience from Karnataka district mental health program

BACKGROUND

Public funded outreach services for persons with severe mental disorders (SMDs), a norm in developed nations, is non-existent in India. We share our pilot experience with an indigenous model named 'Care at Doorsteps' (CADs) for persons with SMDs who dropped out from clinical care of District Mental Health Program (DMHP) at three sites of Karnataka, a south Indian state.

AIM

The objectives of this study were to identify the reasons for drop outs from routine care and to assess the burden of illness and disability after the intervention.

METHODOLOGY

Six-month prospective observational study on patients aged 18-60 years, diagnosed as Schizophrenia or bipolar disorder was conducted. Three home visits were made by the team and provided medications, also offered brief psychoeducation and counselling. Care-givers were interviewed to identify the reasons for drop outs and their expectations from the treating team. Patients were also assessed using the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI), Indian Disability Evaluation and Assessment Scale (IDEAS) and Burden Assessment Schedule (BAS) during each visit.

RESULTS

Ninety-six patients (50 males and 46 females) were followed up, of which 85 had a diagnosis of schizophrenia and 11 with bipolar illness. Common reasons for drop out were: single caregiver (breadwinner) unable to accompany the patient, loss of faith in medical treatment and financial constraints. Symptomatic improvement and restoration of productive work were the priority expectations. Over the course, the mean CGI-S showed significant reduction (4.81 ± 1.57, 4.46 ± 1.32 and 4.11 ± 1.39 respectively; p = 0.001). Mean score on BAS showed a significant reduction (85.76 ± 12.15, 83.46 ± 11.30, 84.27 ± 11.82; p = 0.04). Mean total IDEAS scores did not show significant change (13.27 ± 4.78, 12.82 ± 4.24, 13.17 ± 4.40; p = 0.16).

CONCLUSION

Meaningful assertive outreach care is feasible in India and is found to be useful for persons with SMDs by utilising the already existing public sector resources.

Self-stigma and medication adherence among patients with mental illness treated at Jimma University Medical Center, Southwest Ethiopia

Background

Self-stigma associated with mental illness has remained a global public health issue affecting social interactions, health care, productivity and acceptance among others. It is one of important factors contributing to non-adherence to medication that leads to increased hospitalization and higher healthcare costs. Hence, the study aimed to assess self-stigma and medication adherence among patients with mental illness treated at the psychiatric clinic of Jimma University Medical Center (JUMC).

Methods

A cross-sectional, community-level study was conducted at Jimma town. The patient’s data was collected from records between April and June 2017 and the collected data was analyzed using SPSS version 21. The Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness (ISMI) tool was utilized to measure internalized stigma. Linear regression analysis was performed to get the final model. Statistical significance association was considered at p-values less than 0.05 and 95% confidence interval was used.

Results

Males comprised more than half (61%) of the total sample of 300 respondents and with a mean age of 34.99 (SD ± 11.51) years. About one-third (32%) of patients had a working diagnosis of schizophrenia followed by major depressive disorder (24.3%). More than half of them, 182 (60.7%) were adherent to their psychotropic medication. The overall mean value of self-stigma was 2.16 (SD = 0.867) and 84 (28%) of the respondents had moderate to high self-stigma. Using ISMI the mean score of alienation was 2.26 (SD = 0.95), stereotype endorsement 2.14 (SD = 0.784), perceived discrimination 2.18 (SD = 0.90), social withdrawal 2.10 (SD = 0.857) and stigma resistance 2.11 (SD = 0.844). Increasing age of the patients (std. β = − 0.091, p = 0.009) and living with kids and spouse (std. β = − 0.099, p = 0.038) were negatively associated with self-stigma whereas increased world health organization disability assessment schedule (WHODAS) score (β = 0.501, p < 0.001), number of relapses (std. β = 0.183, p < 0.01) and medication non-adherence (std. β = 0.084, p = 0.021) were positively associated with self-stigma.

Conclusion

The study revealed that there was high self-stigma among patients with mental illness and a significant association between overall ISMI score and level of medication adherence. These require mental health professionals and policy-makers should give attention to ways to overcome self-stigma and increase medication adherence among patients with mental illness.

A comparative study of childhood/adolescent and adult onset schizophrenia: does the neurocognitive and psychosocial outcome differ?

AIMS & OBJECTIVES

The present study aimed to evaluate the neurocognitive functioning and psychosocial outcome (in terms of social functioning, disability and internalized stigma) in patients with schizophrenia with childhood/adolescent onset (age of onset ≤18 years) and adult onset (>18years) schizophrenia and to evaluate the effect of neurocognitive impairment on the outcome variables in patients with youth and adult onset schizophrenia.

METHODOLOGY

34 patients with youth onset schizophrenia (Group-I) and 56 patients with adult onset schizophrenia (Group-II), who were currently in clinical remission were assessed on a comprehensive neurocognitive battery,Positive and Negative syndrome Scale (PANSS), Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF), Indian Disability Evaluation and Assessment Scale (IDEAS),Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFS) and Internalised Stigma of Mental Illness Scale (ISMIS).

RESULTS

On neurocognitive domains (after adjusting for co-variates) significant differences were noted between the two groups in terms of processing speed (TMT-A; I > II; p-value -0.009), verbal fluency (COWA;I < II;p-value-0.001) and cognitive flexibility (TMT-B; I > II; p -0.031). Compared to patients with adult onset schizophrenia, patients with childhood & adolescent onset schizophrenia had significantly higher PANSS negative score, higher disability in all domains of IDEAS, poorer socio-occupational functioning, low global functioning and reported more stigma in the domains of alienation and discrimination.In patients with childhood & adolescent onset schizophrenia, higher deficits in the processing speed and verbal fluency were associated with significantly lower socio-occupational functioning and higher disability; higher executive dysfunction was associated with higher internalized stigma. Among patients with adult onset schizophrenia, higher disability was related to executive dysfunction only and higher stigma was associated with poor cognitive processing, selective attention and poor executive functioning.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study suggests that compared to adult onset schizophrenia, patients with childhood & adolescent onset schizophrenia have more deficits in neurocognition, have higher level of disability, poorer socio-occupational functioning and have higher level of self-stigma.