Frail by different measures: a comparison of 8-year mortality in The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA)

Comparison of different frailty instruments for prediction of functional decline in older hypertensive outpatients (HYPER-FRAIL pilot study 2)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Few studies have evaluated frailty in older hypertensive individuals and the most appropriate tools to identify frailty in this population have yet to be identified. This study compared the performance of six frailty instruments in the prediction of 1-year functional decline in older hypertensive outpatients.

METHODS

The HYPERtension and FRAILty in Older Adults (HYPER-FRAIL) longitudinal pilot study involved hypertensive participants ≥75 years from two geriatric outpatient clinics at Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy, undergoing identification of frailty with four frailty scales (Fried Frailty Phenotype, Frailty Index [FI], Clinical Frailty Scale [CFS], Frailty Postal Score) and two physical performance tests (Short Physical Performance Battery [SPPB] and gait speed). Prediction of 1-year functional decline (i.e. a ≥ 10-point Barthel Index decrease between baseline and follow-up) was examined based on ROC curve analysis and multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among 116 participants, 24 % reported functional decline. In the ROC curve analyses, FI (AUC=0.76), CFS (AUC=0.77), gait speed (AUC=0.73) and the SPPB (AUC=0.77) achieved the best predictive performance, with FI ≥0.21 and CFS ≥4 showing the highest sensitivity (82 %) and negative predictive value (91 %). Frailty identified with FI, CFS or physical performance tests was associated with an increased risk of 1-year functional decline, independently of baseline functional status and comorbidity burden.

CONCLUSIONS

FI, CFS and physical performance tests showed similar predictive ability for functional decline in hypertensive outpatients. The CFS and gait speed might be more suitable for clinical use and may be useful to identify non-frail individuals at lower risk of functional decline.

The lived experience of frailty: beyond classification and towards a holistic understanding of health

PURPOSE

Frailty is characterised by decreased physiological reserves and vulnerability to stressors. Although scales, such as the Fried's Frailty Phenotype (FP), Frailty Index (FI), and Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), are used to identify frailty, the lived experience of frailty remains understudied.

METHODS

This cross-sectional observational research involved participants aged 65 years and older from Wave 1 of The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA). Participants were categorised into four independent groups: three frail groups based on the aforementioned scales and a non-frail group. Quantitative variables, including self-rated health, CASP-19 quality-of-life score, and frequency of social activities, were analysed and described.

RESULTS

The study encompassed 1999 participants with an average age of 72 years, of whom 51% were women. FP exclusively identified 1.6% as frail (n = 32), FI 11.7% (n = 233), and CFS 6.8% (n = 135). More than 60% of all those classified as frail reported their health as good, very good, or excellent, with the lowest proportion (64%) being among frail by FI participants. Frail by FI participants exhibited the lowest mean average CASP-19 score, yet it remained relatively high at 39 out of 57 points. Over 77% of all frail individuals engaged in active leisure activities at least once a month.

CONCLUSION

This study underscores the need to comprehend frailty holistically beyond its mere identification. It challenges the prevailing belief that frailty inevitably leads to impaired quality of life and limited social engagement. The findings advocate for a reassessment of how both the general public and healthcare professionals perceive frailty.

Were Frailty Identification Criteria Created Equal? A Comparative Case Study on Continuous Non-Invasively Collected Neurocardiovascular Signals during an Active Standing Test in the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA)

BACKGROUND

In this observational study, we compared continuous physiological signals during an active standing test in adults aged 50 years and over, characterised as frail by three different criteria, using data from The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA).

METHODS

This study utilised data from TILDA, an ongoing landmark prospective cohort study of community-dwelling adults aged 50 years or older in Ireland. The initial sampling strategy in TILDA was based on random geodirectory sampling. Four independent groups were identified: those characterised as frail only by one of the frailty tools used (the physical Frailty Phenotype (FP), the 32-item Frailty Index (FI), or the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) classification tree), and a fourth group where participants were not characterised as frail by any of these tools. Continuous non-invasive physiological signals were collected during an active standing test, including systolic (sBP) and diastolic (dBP) blood pressure, as well as heart rate (HR), using digital artery photoplethysmography. Additionally, the frontal lobe cerebral oxygenation (Oxy), deoxygenation (Deoxy), and tissue saturation index (TSI) were also non-invasively measured using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). The signals were visualised across frailty groups and statistically compared using one-dimensional statistical parametric mapping (SPM).

RESULTS

A total of 1124 participants (mean age of 63.5 years; 50.2% women) were included: 23 were characterised as frail only by the FP, 97 by the FI, 38 by the CFS, and 966 by none of these criteria. The SPM analyses revealed that only the group characterised as frail by the FI had significantly different signals (p < 0.001) compared to the non-frail group. Specifically, they exhibited an attenuated gain in HR between 10 and 15 s post-stand and larger deficits in sBP and dBP between 15 and 20 s post-stand.

CONCLUSIONS

The FI proved to be more adept at capturing distinct physiological responses to standing, likely due to its direct inclusion of cardiovascular morbidities in its definition. Significant differences were observed in the dynamics of cardiovascular signals among the frail populations identified by different frailty criteria, suggesting that caution should be taken when employing frailty identification tools on physiological signals, particularly the neurocardiovascular signals in an active standing test.

Frailty prevalence and efficient screening in primary care-based memory clinics

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the prevalence of frailty among patients with memory concerns attending a primary care-based memory clinic.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to describe the prevalence of frailty among patients attending a primary care-based memory clinic and to determine if prevalence rates differ based on the screening tool that is used.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective medical record review for all consecutive patients assessed in a primary care-based memory clinic over 8 months. Frailty was measured in 258 patients using the Fried frailty criteria, which relies on physical measures, and the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), which relies on functional status. Weighted kappa statistics were calculated to compare the Fried frailty and the CFS.

RESULTS

The prevalence of frailty was 16% by Fried criteria and 48% by the CFS. Agreement between Fried frailty and CFS was fair for CFS 5+ (kappa = 0.22; 95% confidence interval: 0.13, 0.32) and moderate for CFS 6+ (kappa = 0.47; 0.34, 0.61). Dual-trait measures of hand grip strength with gait speed were found to be a valid proxy for Fried frailty phenotype.

CONCLUSIONS

Among primary care patients with memory concerns, frailty prevalence rates differed based on the measure used. Screening for frailty in this population using measures relying on physical performance may be a more efficient approach for persons already at risk of further health instability from cognitive impairment. Our findings demonstrate how measure selection should be based on the objectives and context in which frailty screening occurs.

Evaluation of a 3-Item Health Index in Predicting Mortality Risk: A 12-Year Follow-Up Study

This study was carried out using a large cohort (N = 4265; 416 deceased) of older, community-dwelling adults from The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA). The study compared the performance of a new 3-item health index (HI) with two existing measures, the 32-item frailty index (FI) and the frailty phenotype (FP), in predicting mortality risk. The HI was based on the objective measurement of resting-state systolic blood pressure sample entropy, sustained attention reaction time performance, and usual gait speed. Mortality data from a 12-year follow up period were analyzed using Cox proportional regression. All data processing was performed using MATLAB and statistical analysis using STATA 15.1. The HI showed good discriminatory power (AUC = 0.68) for all-cause mortality, similar to FI (AUC = 0.68) and superior to FP (AUC = 0.60). The HI classified participants into Low-Risk (84%), Medium-Risk (15%), and High-Risk (1%) groups, with the High-Risk group showing a significant hazard ratio (HR) of 5.91 in the unadjusted model and 2.06 in the fully adjusted model. The HI also exhibited superior predictive performance for cardiovascular and respiratory deaths (AUC = 0.74), compared with FI (AUC = 0.70) and FP (AUC = 0.64). The HI High-Risk group had the highest HR (15.10 in the unadjusted and 5.61 in the fully adjusted models) for cardiovascular and respiratory mortality. The HI remained a significant predictor of mortality even after comprehensively adjusting for confounding variables. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of the 3-item HI in predicting 12-year mortality risk across different causes of death. The HI performed similarly to FI and FP for all-cause mortality but outperformed them in predicting cardiovascular and respiratory deaths. Its ability to classify individuals into risk groups offers a practical approach for clinicians and researchers. Additionally, the development of a user-friendly MATLAB App facilitates its implementation in clinical settings. Subject to external validation in clinical research settings, the HI can be more useful than existing frailty measures in the prediction of cardio-respiratory risk.

Frailty and Colorectal Surgery: Review and Concept of Cancer Frailty

Frailty is characterized by reduced physiological reserves across multiple systems. In patients with frailty, oncological surgery has been associated with a high rate of postoperative complications and worse overall survival. Further, given that cancer and frailty can co-exist in the same patient, cancer and cancer-related symptoms can rapidly accelerate the progression of baseline frailty, which we have termed "cancer frailty". This distinction is clinically meaningful because the prioritization of interventions and the treatment outcomes may differ based on health conditions. Specifically, in patients with cancer frailty, improvements in frailty may be achieved via surgical removal of tumors, while prehabilitation may be less effective, which may in turn result in delayed treatment and cancer progression. In this review, we focused on challenges in the surgical treatment of non-metastatic colorectal cancers in patients with frailty, including those related to decision making, prehabilitation, and surgery. Potential recommendations for treating patients with cancer frailty are also discussed.

Association of kidney function and albuminuria with frailty worsening and death in very old adults

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Studies analysing the association of albuminuria and prevalent frailty in community-dwelling very old adults are scarce and lack information on incident frailty. We investigated the association of kidney function decline and increase of albuminuria with frailty worsening or death in very old adults.

DESIGN

Longitudinal analyses with biennial visits of the Berlin Initiative (cohort) Study and a frailty follow-up of 2.1 years.

SETTING/SUBJECTS

1,076 participants with a mean age of 84.3 (5.6) years of whom 54% were female.

METHODS

Partial proportional odds models were used to assess the association of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline and/or albuminuria (albumin creatinine ratio, ACR) with frailty worsening or death.

RESULTS

At frailty baseline, 1,076 participants with an eGFR of 50 (13) ml/min/1.73 m2, 48% being prefrail and 31% frail were included. After median 2.1 years, 960 (90%) participants had valid information on frailty transition: 187 (17.5%) worsened and 111 (10.3%) died. In the multivariable model, the odds of frailty worsening for participants with albuminuria in combination with eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 were elevated [OR (95% CI): 2.47 (1.41-4.31)] compared to participants without albuminuria and eGFR ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2 as there was a rapid eGFR decline of ≥3 ml/min/1.73 m2 per year [1.55 (1.04-2.33)] and albuminuria trajectories six years prior [1.53 (1.11-2.10)] to frailty baseline. The odds of death for each exposure were even higher.

CONCLUSIONS

In older adults, advanced stages of CKD and albuminuria alone were associated with 2-fold odds of frailty worsening independent of death.

When overtreatment of cutaneous malignancy becomes an unacceptable burden for patients with limited life expectancy: a patient's perspective

Concern has been raised that there is a potential for over treatment of NMSCs among older patients, given the relative low risk of the tumour to their health and the high burden of treatment. This article explores one patient’s perspective of the treatment of multiple NMSCs.

Older adults identified as frail by Frailty Index and FRAIL scale who were intensively treated for hypertension were at increased risk of 2-year adverse health outcomes in The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA)

Background: Frailty is associated with adverse health outcomes. In frail older adults, blood pressure (BP) treated intensively may result in adverse events. We hypothesised that frail older adults, with BP treated below the threshold of the 2018 European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension (ESC/ESH) guideline (<130/70 mmHg), could be associated with adverse health outcomes. Methods: Data was gathered from participants in Wave 1 (W1) of The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA) who were aged ≥65 years and on treatment for hypertension. Frail classifications as per a 32-item Frailty Index (FI) and FRAIL (Fatigue, Resistance, Ambulation, Illnesses & Loss of Weight) scale were compared in their ability to predict W2 (2-year) adverse outcomes associated with intensive BP control (‘below threshold (BT)’: <130/70 mmHg vs. ‘above threshold (AT)’: ≥130/70 mmHg). We created eight participant groups based on frailty-BP status. W2 outcomes were analysed using adjusted binary logistic regression models. Results: In W1, 1,920 participants were included. Of these 1,274 had complete FI-BP and 1,276 FRAIL-BP data. The frail by FI treated BT and frail by FRAIL treated BT had increased risk of hospitalisation, heart failure and falls/fracture by W2. The frail by FRAIL treated BT also had increased risk of mortality by W2. The frail by FI treated AT had increased risk of syncope and falls/fractures. The non-frail by FI or FRAIL did not have any increased risk of the adverse outcomes studied. Conclusions: FI and FRAIL captured increased risk of adverse health outcomes when BP was treated below the current ESC/ESH threshold. FI and FRAIL could be more useful than other frailty identification tools to signal risks associated with tighter BP control in frail older adults. Future hypertension management guidelines should consider incorporating specific frailty identification tools to help guide clinicians in making personalised BP medication treatment decisions.

Older adults identified as frail by Frailty Index and FRAIL scale who were intensively treated for hypertension were at increased risk of 2-year adverse health outcomes in The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA)

Background: Frailty is associated with adverse health outcomes. In frail older adults, blood pressure (BP) treated intensively may result in side effects including orthostatic hypotension, falls or fractures. We hypothesised that frail older adults, with BP treated below the threshold of the 2018 European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension (ESC/ESH) guideline (<130/70 mmHg), could be associated with adverse health outcomes. Methods: Data was gathered from participants in Wave 1 (W1) of The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA) who were aged ≥65 years and on treatment for hypertension. Frail classifications as per a 32-item Frailty Index (FI) and FRAIL (Fatigue, Resistance, Ambulation, Illnesses & Loss of Weight) scale were compared in their ability to predict W2 (2-year) adverse outcomes associated with intensive BP control (‘low’: <130/70 mmHg vs. ‘high’: ≥130/70 mmHg). We created eight participant groups based on frailty-BP status. W2 outcomes were analysed using adjusted binary logistic regression models. Results: In W1, 1,920 participants were included. Of these 1,274 had complete FI-BP and 1,276 FRAIL-BP data. The frail by FI treated low and frail by FRAIL treated low had increased risk of hospitalisation, heart failure and falls/fracture by W2. The frail by FRAIL treated low also had increased risk of mortality by W2. The frail by FI treated high had increased risk of syncope and falls/fractures. The non-frail by FI or FRAIL did not have increased risk of any of the adverse outcomes studied. Conclusions: FI and FRAIL captured increased risk of adverse health outcomes when BP was treated below the current ESC/ESH threshold. FI and FRAIL could be more useful than other frailty identification tools to signal risks associated with tighter BP control in frail older adults. Hypertension management guidelines should specify which frailty identification tools clinicians should use to help them make personalised treatment decisions.