1
|
Delcamp C, Srinivasan R, Cramer SC. EEG Provides Insights Into Motor Control and Neuroplasticity During Stroke Recovery. Stroke 2024; 55:2579-2583. [PMID: 39171399 PMCID: PMC11421965 DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.124.048458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/23/2024]
Abstract
In many branches of medicine, treatment is guided by measuring its effects on underlying physiology. In this regard, the efficacy of rehabilitation/recovery therapies could be enhanced if their administration was guided by measurements that directly capture treatment effects on neural function. Measures of brain function via EEG may be useful toward this goal and have advantages such as ease of bedside acquisition, safety, and low cost. This review synthetizes EEG studies during the subacute phase poststroke, when spontaneous recovery is maximal, and focuses on movement. Event-related measures reflect cortical activation and inhibition, while connectivity measures capture the function of cortical networks. Several EEG-based measures are related to motor outcomes poststroke and warrant further evaluation. Ultimately, they may be useful for clinical decision-making and clinical trial design in stroke neurorehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Célia Delcamp
- Department of Neurology, University of California Los Angeles (C.D., S.C.C.)
- California Rehabilitation Institute, Los Angeles (C.D., S.C.C.)
| | - Ramesh Srinivasan
- Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California Irvine (R.S.)
| | - Steven C Cramer
- Department of Neurology, University of California Los Angeles (C.D., S.C.C.)
- California Rehabilitation Institute, Los Angeles (C.D., S.C.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Frömer R, Nassar MR, Ehinger BV, Shenhav A. Common neural choice signals can emerge artefactually amid multiple distinct value signals. Nat Hum Behav 2024:10.1038/s41562-024-01971-z. [PMID: 39242928 DOI: 10.1038/s41562-024-01971-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2024] [Indexed: 09/09/2024]
Abstract
Previous work has identified characteristic neural signatures of value-based decision-making, including neural dynamics that closely resemble the ramping evidence accumulation process believed to underpin choice. Here we test whether these signatures of the choice process can be temporally dissociated from additional, choice-'independent' value signals. Indeed, EEG activity during value-based choice revealed distinct spatiotemporal clusters, with a stimulus-locked cluster reflecting affective reactions to choice sets and a response-locked cluster reflecting choice difficulty. Surprisingly, 'neither' of these clusters met the criteria for an evidence accumulation signal. Instead, we found that stimulus-locked activity can 'mimic' an evidence accumulation process when aligned to the response. Re-analysing four previous studies, including three perceptual decision-making studies, we show that response-locked signatures of evidence accumulation disappear when stimulus-locked and response-locked activity are modelled jointly. Collectively, our findings show that neural signatures of value can reflect choice-independent processes and look deceptively like evidence accumulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Romy Frömer
- Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
- Carney Institute for Brain Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
- School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
- Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
| | - Matthew R Nassar
- Carney Institute for Brain Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Benedikt V Ehinger
- Stuttgart Center for Simulation Science, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Amitai Shenhav
- Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Carney Institute for Brain Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Department of Psychology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
- Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nunez MD, Fernandez K, Srinivasan R, Vandekerckhove J. A tutorial on fitting joint models of M/EEG and behavior to understand cognition. Behav Res Methods 2024; 56:6020-6050. [PMID: 38409458 PMCID: PMC11335833 DOI: 10.3758/s13428-023-02331-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
Abstract
We present motivation and practical steps necessary to find parameter estimates of joint models of behavior and neural electrophysiological data. This tutorial is written for researchers wishing to build joint models of human behavior and scalp and intracranial electroencephalographic (EEG) or magnetoencephalographic (MEG) data, and more specifically those researchers who seek to understand human cognition. Although these techniques could easily be applied to animal models, the focus of this tutorial is on human participants. Joint modeling of M/EEG and behavior requires some knowledge of existing computational and cognitive theories, M/EEG artifact correction, M/EEG analysis techniques, cognitive modeling, and programming for statistical modeling implementation. This paper seeks to give an introduction to these techniques as they apply to estimating parameters from neurocognitive models of M/EEG and human behavior, and to evaluate model results and compare models. Due to our research and knowledge on the subject matter, our examples in this paper will focus on testing specific hypotheses in human decision-making theory. However, most of the motivation and discussion of this paper applies across many modeling procedures and applications. We provide Python (and linked R) code examples in the tutorial and appendix. Readers are encouraged to try the exercises at the end of the document.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael D Nunez
- Psychological Methods, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Kianté Fernandez
- Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ramesh Srinivasan
- Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
- Institute of Mathematical Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Joachim Vandekerckhove
- Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
- Institute of Mathematical Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
- Department of Statistics, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Oguz OC, Aydin B, Urgen BA. Biological motion perception in the theoretical framework of perceptual decision-making: An event-related potential study. Vision Res 2024; 218:108380. [PMID: 38479050 DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2024.108380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Revised: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
Biological motion perception plays a critical role in various decisions in daily life. Failure to decide accordingly in such a perceptual task could have life-threatening consequences. Neurophysiology and computational modeling studies suggest two processes mediating perceptual decision-making. One of these signals is associated with the accumulation of sensory evidence and the other with response selection. Recent EEG studies with humans have introduced an event-related potential called Centroparietal Positive Potential (CPP) as a neural marker aligned with the sensory evidence accumulation while effectively distinguishing it from motor-related lateralized readiness potential (LRP). The present study aims to investigate the neural mechanisms of biological motion perception in the framework of perceptual decision-making, which has been overlooked before. More specifically, we examine whether CPP would track the coherence of the biological motion stimuli and could be distinguished from the LRP signal. We recorded EEG from human participants while they performed a direction discrimination task of a point-light walker stimulus embedded in various levels of noise. Our behavioral findings revealed shorter reaction times and reduced miss rates as the coherence of the stimuli increased. In addition, CPP tracked the coherence of the biological motion stimuli with a tendency to reach a common level during the response, albeit with a later onset than the previously reported results in random-dot motion paradigms. Furthermore, CPP was distinguished from the LRP signal based on its temporal profile. Overall, our results suggest that the mechanisms underlying perceptual decision-making generalize to more complex and socially significant stimuli like biological motion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osman Cagri Oguz
- Department of Psychology, Bilkent University, Ankara 06800, Turkey; Department of Neuroscience, Bilkent University, Ankara 06800, Turkey.
| | - Berfin Aydin
- Department of Neuroscience, Bilkent University, Ankara 06800, Turkey
| | - Burcu A Urgen
- Department of Psychology, Bilkent University, Ankara 06800, Turkey; Department of Neuroscience, Bilkent University, Ankara 06800, Turkey; Aysel Sabuncu Brain Research Center and National Magnetic Resonance Research Center (UMRAM), Bilkent University, Ankara 06800, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vo K, Sun QJ, Nunez MD, Vandekerckhove J, Srinivasan R. Deep latent variable joint cognitive modeling of neural signals and human behavior. Neuroimage 2024; 291:120559. [PMID: 38447682 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Revised: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024] Open
Abstract
As the field of computational cognitive neuroscience continues to expand and generate new theories, there is a growing need for more advanced methods to test the hypothesis of brain-behavior relationships. Recent progress in Bayesian cognitive modeling has enabled the combination of neural and behavioral models into a single unifying framework. However, these approaches require manual feature extraction, and lack the capability to discover previously unknown neural features in more complex data. Consequently, this would hinder the expressiveness of the models. To address these challenges, we propose a Neurocognitive Variational Autoencoder (NCVA) to conjoin high-dimensional EEG with a cognitive model in both generative and predictive modeling analyses. Importantly, our NCVA enables both the prediction of EEG signals given behavioral data and the estimation of cognitive model parameters from EEG signals. This novel approach can allow for a more comprehensive understanding of the triplet relationship between behavior, brain activity, and cognitive processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khuong Vo
- Department of Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, USA.
| | - Qinhua Jenny Sun
- Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, USA.
| | - Michael D Nunez
- Psychological Methods, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Joachim Vandekerckhove
- Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, USA; Department of Statistics, University of California, Irvine, USA.
| | - Ramesh Srinivasan
- Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kraemer PM, Gluth S. Episodic Memory Retrieval Affects the Onset and Dynamics of Evidence Accumulation during Value-based Decisions. J Cogn Neurosci 2023; 35:692-714. [PMID: 36724395 DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
In neuroeconomics, there is much interest in understanding simple value-based choices where agents choose between visually presented goods, comparable to a shopping scenario in a supermarket. However, many everyday decisions are made in the physical absence of the considered goods, requiring agents to recall information about the goods from memory. Here, we asked whether and how this reliance on an internal memory representation affects the temporal dynamics of decision making on a cognitive and neural level. Participants performed a remember-and-decide task in which they made simple purchasing decisions between money offers and snack items while undergoing EEG. Snack identity was presented either visually (value trials) or had to be recalled from memory (memory trials). Behavioral data indicated comparable choice consistency across both trial types, but considerably longer RTs in memory trials. Drift-diffusion modeling suggested that this RT difference was because of longer nondecision time of decision processes as well as altered evidence accumulation dynamics (lower accumulation rate and higher decision threshold). The nondecision time effect was supported by a delayed onset of the lateralized readiness potential. These results show that both decision and nondecision processes are prolonged when participants need to resort to internal memory representations during value-based decisions.
Collapse
|
7
|
Manning C, Hassall CD, Hunt LT, Norcia AM, Wagenmakers EJ, Snowling MJ, Scerif G, Evans NJ. Visual Motion and Decision-Making in Dyslexia: Reduced Accumulation of Sensory Evidence and Related Neural Dynamics. J Neurosci 2022; 42:121-134. [PMID: 34782439 PMCID: PMC8741156 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.1232-21.2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Revised: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Children with and without dyslexia differ in their behavioral responses to visual information, particularly when required to pool dynamic signals over space and time. Importantly, multiple processes contribute to behavioral responses. Here we investigated which processing stages are affected in children with dyslexia when performing visual motion processing tasks, by combining two methods that are sensitive to the dynamic processes leading to responses. We used a diffusion model which decomposes response time and accuracy into distinct cognitive constructs, and high-density EEG. Fifty children with dyslexia (24 male) and 50 typically developing children (28 male) 6-14 years of age judged the direction of motion as quickly and accurately as possible in two global motion tasks (motion coherence and direction integration), which varied in their requirements for noise exclusion. Following our preregistered analyses, we fitted hierarchical Bayesian diffusion models to the data, blinded to group membership. Unblinding revealed reduced evidence accumulation in children with dyslexia compared with typical children for both tasks. Additionally, we identified a response-locked EEG component which was maximal over centro-parietal electrodes which indicated a neural correlate of reduced drift rate in dyslexia in the motion coherence task, thereby linking brain and behavior. We suggest that children with dyslexia tend to be slower to extract sensory evidence from global motion displays, regardless of whether noise exclusion is required, thus furthering our understanding of atypical perceptual decision-making processes in dyslexia.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Reduced sensitivity to visual information has been reported in dyslexia, with a lively debate about whether these differences causally contribute to reading difficulties. In this large preregistered study with a blind modeling approach, we combine state-of-the art methods in both computational modeling and EEG analysis to pinpoint the stages of processing that are atypical in children with dyslexia in two visual motion tasks that vary in their requirement for noise exclusion. We find reduced evidence accumulation in children with dyslexia across both tasks, and identify a neural marker, allowing us to link brain and behavior. We show that children with dyslexia exhibit general difficulties with extracting sensory evidence from global motion displays, not just in tasks that require noise exclusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Manning
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom, OX2 6GG
- School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, Berkshire, United Kingdom, RG6 6ES
| | - Cameron D Hassall
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom, OX3 7JX
| | - Laurence T Hunt
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom, OX3 7JX
| | - Anthony M Norcia
- Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, US
| | - Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
- Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Amsterdam, 1001 NH Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Margaret J Snowling
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom, OX2 6GG
| | - Gaia Scerif
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom, OX2 6GG
| | - Nathan J Evans
- School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072 Australia
| |
Collapse
|