Persistent Complete Heart Block in a Patient with COVID-19 Infection: a Case Report

Conduction system disorders and electrocardiographic findings in COVID-19 deceased patients in 2021, Shiraz, Iran. World J Cardiol 2022;14:617-625. [PMID: 36605421 PMCID: PMC9808027 DOI: 10.4330/wjc.v14.i12.617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0]

BACKGROUND

Cardiac conduction disorders and electrocardiographic (ECG) changes may occur as a manifestation of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), especially in severe cases.

AIM

To describe conduction system disorders and their association with other electrocardiographic parameters in patients who died of COVID-19.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, electrocardiographic and clinical data of 432 patients who expired from COVID-19 between August 1^st, 2021, and December 1^st, 2021, in a tertiary hospital were reviewed.

RESULTS

Among 432 patients who died from COVID-19, atrioventricular block (AVB) was found in 40 (9.3%). Among these 40 patients, 28 (6.5%) suffered from 1st degree AVB, and 12 (2.8%) suffered from complete heart block (CHB). Changes in ST-T wave, compatible with myocardial infarction or localized myocarditis, appeared in 189 (59.0%). Findings compatible with myocardial injury, such as fragmented QRS and prolonged QTc, were found in 91 patients (21.1%) and 28 patients (6.5%), respectively. In patients who died of COVID-19, conduction disorder was unrelated to any underlying medical condition. Fragmented QRS, axis deviation, and ST-T changes were significantly related to conduction system disorder in patients who died of COVID-19 (P value < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Conduction system disorders are associated with several other ECG abnormalities, especially those indicative of myocardial ischemia or inflammation. Most patients (73.14%) who died of COVID-19 demonstrated at least one ECG abnormality parameter. Since a COVID-19 patient's ECG gives important information regarding their cardiac health, our findings can help develop a risk stratification method for at-risk COVID-19 patients in future studies.

Transient but recurrent complete heart block in a patient after COVID-19 vaccination – A case report

Introduction

Cardiovascular disorders have been extensively reported during COVID-19 illness, including arrhythmias such as atrioventricular conduction disturbances. To date, one case of transient heart block has been reported after COVID-19 vaccine.

Case presentation

A 73 years-old woman presented with shortness of breath and fatigue 2 weeks after receiving her second dose of BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. ECG showed complete AV block with normal narrow QRS complexes. Chronic treatment with Bisoprolol for hypertension was stopped but complete AV block persisted 48 hours thereafter. Therefore, a permanent pacemaker was implanted. Three months later, pacemaker follow-up revealed no ventricular stimulation, suggesting complete recovery of AV conduction, even after resumption of bisoprolol. Five months after the second dose, she received a third dose of the same vaccine. Three weeks later, she once again complained of dyspnea on exertion. ECG showed sinus rhythm with permanent ventricular stimulation. After device inhibition, complete AV block was confirmed and, 2 weeks later, conduction was restored once more.

Clinical discussion

It is known that vaccines can induce AV conduction disturbances, mostly reversible. The underlying mechanisms leading to high-degree AV block remain unclear and are probably multiple. Although being exceptional after COVID-19 vaccine, our case illustrates the fact that the latter can induce such a disturbance which may be transient and recurrent even in the absence of underlying conduction disorder.

Conclusion

COVID-19 vaccination may transitorily interfere with cardiac conduction system even in subjects without known underlying heart disease.

•

Transient but recurrent complete AV block after COVID-19 vaccine.

Characteristics of bradyarrhythmia in patients with COVID-19: Systematic scoping review

COVID‐19 has recently been associated with the development of bradyarrhythmias, although its mechanism is still unclear. We aim to summarize the existing evidence regarding bradyarrhythmia in COVID‐19 and provide future directions for research. Following the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews, we searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for all peer‐reviewed articles using keywords including“Bradycardia,” “atrioventricular block,” and “COVID‐19″ from their inception to October 13, 2021. Forty‐three articles, including 11 observational studies and 59 cases from case reports and series, were included in the systematic review. Although some observational studies reported increased mortality in those with bradyarrhythmia and COVID‐19, the lack of comparative groups and small sample sizes hinder the ability to draw definitive conclusions. Among 59 COVID‐19 patients with bradycardia from case reports and series, bradycardia most often occurred in those with severe or critical COVID‐19, and complete heart block occurred in the majority of cases despite preserved LVEF (55.9%). Pacemaker insertion was required in 76.3% of the patients, most of which were permanent implants (45.8%). This systematic review summarizes the current evidence and characteristics of bradyarrhythmia in patients with COVID‐19. Further studies are critical to assess the reversibility of bradyarrhythmia in COVID‐19 patients and to clarify potential therapeutic targets including the need for permanent pacing.

Implantation of cardiac electronic devices in active COVID-19 patients: Results from an international survey

BACKGROUND

Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation rates as well as the clinical and procedural characteristics and outcomes in patients with known active coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to gather information regarding CIED procedures during active COVID-19, performed with personal protective equipment, based on an international survey.

METHODS

Fifty-three centers from 13 countries across 4 continents provided information on 166 patients with known active COVID-19 who underwent a CIED procedure.

RESULTS

The CIED procedure rate in 133,655 hospitalized COVID-19 patients ranged from 0 to 16.2 per 1000 patients (P <.001). Most devices were implanted due to high-degree/complete atrioventricular block (112 [67.5%]) or sick sinus syndrome (31 [18.7%]). Of the 166 patients in the study survey, the 30-day complication rate was 13.9% and the 180-day mortality rate was 9.6%. One patient had a fatal outcome as a direct result of the procedure. Differences in patient and procedural characteristics and outcomes were found between Europe and North America. An older population (76.6 vs 66 years; P <.001) with a nonsignificant higher complication rate (16.5% vs 7.7%; P = .2) was observed in Europe vs North America, whereas higher rates of critically ill patients (33.3% vs 3.3%; P <.001) and mortality (26.9% vs 5%; P = .002) were observed in North America vs Europe.

CONCLUSION

CIED procedure rates during known active COVID-19 disease varied greatly, from 0 to 16.2 per 1000 hospitalized COVID-19 patients worldwide. Patients with active COVID-19 infection who underwent CIED implantation had high complication and mortality rates. Operators should take these risks into consideration before proceeding with CIED implantation in active COVID-19 patients.

COVID-19 and Bradyarrhythmias: A Case Report With Literature Review

We report a case of a 51-year-old male with no past medical history who was admitted for acute hypoxic respiratory failure secondary to COVID-19. During his hospitalization, the patient developed sinus bradycardia and frequent sinus pauses were observed on telemetry. No other cause of his bradyarrhythmia was identified except for his COVID-19 infection. There has been numerous case reports and case series describing different arrhythmias seen in patients infected with COVID-19. We present a case of sinus arrest in a patient with COVID-19 and a review of other case reports describing bradyarrhythmia in COVID-19 patients.

COVID-19 BBIBP-CorV vaccine and transient heart block - A phenomenon by chance or a possible correlation - A case report

IMPORTANCE

Bradyarrhythmia during COVID19 illness carries prognostic significance. Electrophysiological side effects of COVID19 vaccine remain largely unknown. It is imperative to report nature of cardiovascular side effects of the vaccine.

CASE PRESENTATION

An 80 years-old-man presented with complains of dizziness, trepidation and shortness of breath following his first shot of COVID-19 BBIBP-CorV (Sino-pharm). ECG on arrival showed 2:1 atrioventricular block with an underlying old left bundle branch block. The AV block changed into Mobitz type-I over the course of next 2 days and into a sinus 1:1 conduction on fourth day of presentation. However, our patient underwent permanent pacemaker implantation due to the underlying conduction tissue disease and intermittent 2:1 AV block during the hospital stay.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

It is likely that patients with an already diseased conduction system are at an increased risk of worsening of AV block following inoculation of the vaccine. Vaccine associated AV blocks are likely to be reversible. Presence of prior coronary artery disease and electrical abnormalities are important considerations.

CONCLUSION

COVID-19 vaccine may have added side effects in subjects with known heart disease. Humoral response towards the vaccine might interfere with the conduction system of the heart and more so in patients with diseased and scarred myocardium.

Post-COVID-19 Syndrome: The Persistent Symptoms at the Post-viral Stage of the Disease. A Systematic Review of the Current Data

Whilst the entire world is battling the second wave of COVID-19, a substantial proportion of patients who have suffered from the condition in the past months are reporting symptoms that last for months after recovery, i. e., long-term COVID-19 symptoms. We aimed to assess the current evidence on the long-term symptoms in COVID-19 patients. We did a systematic review on PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Google Scholar from database inception to February 15, 2021, for studies on long-term COVID-19 symptoms. We included all type of papers that reported at least one long-term COVID-19 symptom. We screened studies using a standardized data collection form and pooled data from published studies. Cohort cross-sectional, case-report, cases-series, case-control studies, and review were graded using specific quality assessment tools. Of 11,361 publications found following our initial search we assessed 218 full-text articles, of which 145 met all selection criteria. We found that 20.70% of reports on long-term COVID-19 symptoms were on abnormal lung functions, 24.13% on neurologic complaints and olfactory dysfunctions, and 55.17% on specific widespread symptoms, mainly chronic fatigue, and pain. Despite the relatively high heterogeneity of the reviewed studies, our findings highlighted that a noteworthy proportion of patients who have suffered from SARS-CoV-2 infection present a "post-COVID syndrome." The multifaceted understanding of all aspects of the COVID-19 pandemic, including these long-term symptoms, will allow us to respond to all the global health challenges, thus paving the way to a stronger public health.