Intravenous esmolol for the treatment of supraventricular tachyarrhythmia: results of a multicenter, baseline-controlled safety and efficacy study in 160 patients. The Esmolol Research Group

Open-Label Two-Dose Pilot Study of Landiolol for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation/Atrial Flutter in Caucasian Patients

BACKGROUND

We investigated for the first time the suitability of landiolol, an ultra-short-acting β1-specific β-blocker, for the treatment of atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (AF/AFL) in Caucasian patients.Methods and Results:The 20 study patients received landiolol as a continuous infusion (starting dose 40 µg/kg/min) with (B+CI) or without (CI) a preceding bolus dose (100 µg/kg/min administered over 1 min) in a prospective open-label study. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with sustained heart rate (HR) reduction ≥20% or to <90 beats/min within 16 min of starting the CI. Secondary endpoints were the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, AF/AFL symptoms, safety and tolerability of landiolol. At 16 min, HR was reduced in all patients treated with landiolol. The primary endpoint was met by 60% of patients in the CI group and 40% in the B+CI group without a significant group difference. Overall reduction of AF/AFL symptoms at 16 min was 72%. Safety and local tolerability of landiolol were excellent, and no serious adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous infusion of landiolol with a starting dose of 40 µg/kg/min is suitable for the acute treatment of tachycardic AF/AFL in Caucasian patients. Administration of a preceding bolus seems unnecessary.

Intravenous esmolol infusion improves surgical fields during sevoflurane-anesthetized endoscopic sinus surgery: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

There is increasing evidence to support the use of anesthetics to affect operative fields during endoscopic sinus surgery and thus the speed, thoroughness, and safety of the surgery itself. Previous research has suggested preoperative beta-blockers improve surgical fields (SFs); our study is novel in showing the impact of a beta-blocker infusion on SFs during sinus surgery.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in 40 patients. Patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis received a constant infusion of i.v. esmolol or saline in addition to a standard inhaled anesthetic protocol. At regular 15-minutes intervals, the quality of SF, heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were assessed. Total blood loss was also recorded.

RESULTS

Average vital sign parameters (HR/SBP/DBP) were significantly lower in the esmolol group (69.1/90.2/55.1 versus 77.2/99.5/63.5; p < 0.01). The esmolol infusion improved SFs relative to control (2.3 versus 2.6; p = 0.045). Esmolol infusion resulted in good SFs (grades 1 and 2) more often than poor fields (grades 3 and 4); on the contrary, the control group showed more poor than good SFs (chi-square; p = 0.04). A correlation between increasing HR and worsening SFs was identified (r = 0.259; p = 0.002). The control group had significantly higher average blood loss (1.3 versus 0.8 mL/min; p = 0.037).

CONCLUSION

Esmolol-induced relative hypotension and bradycardia during endoscopic sinus surgery achieves significantly improved SFs relative to saline control.

Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy of Supraventricular Tachycardia

Pharmacologic therapy is commonly used for the acute treatment and termination of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) and continues to be an important long-term option for some patients. Drug choice depends on the correct diagnosis of the arrhythmia and an understanding of its mechanism. Pharmacologic agents commonly used in the acute and chronic treatment of SVT are reviewed along with their effect on the various types of SVT. Drugs that are well tolerated with minimal side effects are preferred over agents with perhaps more efficacy but higher risk of toxicity.

Cardiovascular medication exposures and poisonings in Izmir, Turkey: A 14-year experience

Cardiovascular medications (CVMs) are frequently prescribed for cardiovascular diseases. The unconscious use of cardiovascular drugs may lead to severe clinical manifestations, even to death, especially when in overdose. The objective of this study is to clarify the profile of CVM exposures admitted to Department of Emergency Medicine in Dokuz Eylul University Hospital (EMDEU) between 1993 and 2006. Case demographics, type of the medication, route and reason for exposure, clinical effects and outcome were recorded. Related to the CVM exposures, 105 poisoning cases were admitted. Mean age of children and adults were 12.8 ± 1.0 and 30.1 ± 1.8, respectively. Females were dominating (77.1%). Poisoning by accident occurred mainly among children in the 0—6 age group (64.3%) and suicide attempt was predominant in the 19—29 age group (47.8%). The most common ingested CVMs admitted to EMDEU were calcium channel blockers (19.7%), beta-blockers (17.3%), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and diuretics (11.8%). Most of the patients were asymptomatic (59.1%). Frequently observed symptom was altered consciousness (18.6%). Antihypertensive drugs are responsible for the most of the CVM exposures. Prospectively designed multi-centered studies are needed to reflect the epidemiological properties of cardiovascular drug exposures throughout our country and would be very valuable for the determination of preventive measures.

Beta-1 selective adrenergic antagonist landiolol and esmolol can be safely used in patients with airway hyperreactivity

This study was undertaken to clarify the effects of esmolol and landiolol, beta-1 selective adrenergic antagonists, on hyperreactive airways in both ovalbumin-sensitized guinea pigs and asthmatic patients. In the animal study, asthma was induced by ovalbumin. After control acetylcholine responses for total pulmonary resistance (Raw) and dynamic lung compliance (Cdyn) were obtained, the animals received propranolol, esmolol, or landiolol, and the same protocol was again performed. Sixty inpatients with coronary risk factors and asthma were enrolled in the human study. Under propofol anesthesia, the patients received saline, esmolol, or landiolol. To assess intubation-induced bronchoconstriction, the presence of wheezing was determined. The dose-response curves of Raw and Cdyn to acetylcholine were significantly elevated and declined in the ovalbumin-sensitized model compared with those in the control group. Neither esmolol nor landiolol had any effect on the acetylcholine-induced response curve in these sensitized animals. However, propranolol significantly enhanced Raw and reduced Cdyn in this model. Tracheal intubation increased the incidence of wheezing in asthmatic patients. However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of wheezing among these groups. The ultra-short-acting beta-1 selective adrenergic antagonists esmolol and landiolol can be safely used perioperatively in patients with airway hyperreactivity.

Pulmonary edema after electroconvulsive therapy in a patient treated for long-standing asthma with a beta2 stimulant

A 68-year-old man was scheduled to receive 8 treatments of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) for severe depression. He was being treated for long-standing asthma with a beta2 stimulant, clenbuterol hydrochloride, and had experienced no asthma attack for 9 years. Although he experienced no adverse consequence in his 7 treatments, pulmonary edema ensued from his eighth treatment despite no change in anesthesia and in the technical parameters of ECT. He was treated with oxygen and intravenous hydrocortisone, after which he quickly recovered. Transient eosinophilia was observed, but clinical symptoms of asthma did not appear. Although the association between pulmonary edema and well-controlled asthma was unclear, thiopental as induction of anesthesia or esmolol as poststimulus delivery might have played a role in the event. There may be a possibility of pulmonary edema even after several uneventful ECT treatments in a patient with asthma.

Comparison of Nicardipine Versus Esmolol in Attenuating the Hemodynamic Responses to Anesthesia Emergence and Extubation

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of intravenous (IV) nicardipine versus esmolol in controlling heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) responses to emergence and extubation.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, double blind.

SETTING

University hospital, single institution.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-two American Society of Anesthesiologists physical class 1 to 3 adult inpatients scheduled for general anesthesia.

INTERVENTIONS

General endotracheal anesthesia with oxygen/isoflurane and muscle relaxation. At end of surgery, with at least 2 twitches by nerve stimulator and end-tidal isoflurane <0.4%, muscle relaxant reversal was accomplished with neostigmine and glycopyrrolate. Two minutes postreversal, the IV study drug nicardipine, 0.03 mg/kg, or esmolol, 1.5 mg/kg, was administered. HR and BP were measured every minute up to 10 minutes and at minute 15 postreversal.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

There were no significant differences between groups in age, weight, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical class or preoperative hemodynamics (HR, BP, mean arterial pressure [MAP]). Compared with nicardipine, 0.03 mg/kg IV, esmolol, 1.5 mg/kg IV, significantly (p < 0.05) attenuated HR more than nicardipine for the 15-minute time period poststudy drug. Compared with esmolol, nicardipine was significantly (p < 0.05) more effective in controlling MAP and systolic BP for the 1- to 3-minute and diastolic BP for the 1- to 2-minute time periods poststudy drug. There were no episodes of hypotension or adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Although esmolol, 1.5 mg/kg, IV was more effective than nicardipine, 0.03 mg/kg, IV for attenuating the HR response to extubation, nicardipine was more effective in controlling the BP response.

Comparison of nicardipine versus placebo to control hemodynamic responses during emergence and extubation

OBJECTIVE

To compare 2 different doses of intravenous nicardipine versus placebo to control heart rate and blood pressure responses to emergence and extubation.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled.

SETTING

University hospital, single-institutional.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty-five American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I through III adult patients.

INTERVENTIONS

General endotracheal anesthesia was with oxygen and isoflurane and muscle relaxation. At the end of surgery, with at least 2 twitches present by nerve stimulator and end-tidal isoflurane <0.4%, reversal was accomplished with neostigmine and glycopyrrolate. Two minutes post-reversal, the study drug (nicardipine, 0.015 mg/kg; nicardipine, 0.03 mg/kg; or a saline placebo) was given. Heart rate and blood pressure were measured for every minute up to 10 minutes and at 15 minutes postreversal.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

There were no significant differences among groups in age, gender, ASA class, weight, or heart rate. The nicardipine groups, 0.015 and 0.03 mg/kg, had lower blood pressure values than the placebo group. There was a significant difference in blood pressure among groups, with greater and more consistent attenuation of blood pressure occurring with the larger nicardipine dose. There were no episodes of hypotension or adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with placebo, both nicardipine doses attenuated blood pressure but not heart rate responses during emergence and extubation. Greater blood pressure control occurred with the larger nicardipine dose of 0.03 mg/kg.

Antiarrhythmic drug therapy in the neonate

The neonate presents a challenge for the practitioner considering antiarrhythmic therapy: pharmacokinetics are different than in older children or adults; and the arrhythmia substrate may also differ, with respect to issues of ion channel and autonomic nervous system development. This paper reviews the need for antiarrhythmic drug therapy in the neonate, developmental aspects of pharmacokinetics, autonomic regulation and cellular electrophysiology and the antiarrhythmics available today with an emphasis on newer drug therapy.

Anesthetic management of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with the use of an axial flow pump and a short-acting beta-blocker

OBJECTIVES

To describe the clinical protocol regarding monitoring, pharmacologic interventions, and postoperative care during and after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on the beating heart with an axial flow pump and a short-acting beta-blocker.

DESIGN

A retrospective study.

SETTING

A university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Seventeen patients scheduled for elective CABG.

INTERVENTIONS

Invasive monitoring was performed with either a standard pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) or a surgically placed PAC. An axial flow pump was inserted through a graft sutured to the ascending aorta. A short-acting beta-blocker was administered to decrease the motion of the heart and make conditions for CABG adequate and safe.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Compared with baseline measurements, there were significant decreases in mean arterial blood pressure, mixed venous oxygen saturation, and right ventricular ejection fraction during maximal axial flow pump support and beta-blockade. No significant change in heart rate was observed at this time. Hemodynamic variables were normalized in the intensive care unit. All patients were separated from the Hemopump without inotropic support, and values of troponin-T, aspartate aminotransferase, and alanine aminotransferase were low postoperatively. All patients survived and were discharged from the hospital.

CONCLUSION

The anesthetic protocol for patients undergoing surgery with a beating heart and the combined use of an axial flow pump and a short-acting beta-blocker is outlined. Multiple-vessel CABG on the beating heart was performed with maintenance of an acceptable hemodynamic situation.

Esmolol for the management of pediatric hypertension after cardiac operations

OBJECTIVE

Hypertension frequently occurs during the immediate postoperative period in children after repair of aortic coarctation but may also occur after repair of other congenital heart defects. Nitroprusside has often been used to control blood pressure in this setting. Because hypertension after coarctation repair is frequently associated with elevations in catecholamines, esmolol, a short-acting beta-blocking agent, may be an effective alternative. Therefore we undertook the first systematic investigation to determine the efficacy and disposition of esmolol in pediatric patients with acute hypertension after cardiac operations.

METHODS

Twenty patients aged 1 month to 12 years (median 25.6 months) with acute hypertension after cardiac operations received esmolol in an opened-labeled trial. Esmolol was titrated to a blood pressure less than or equal to the 90th percentile for age.

RESULTS

Ten patients had coarctation repair and the remaining patients underwent repair of other congenital heart defects. On final esmolol dose (mean +/- standard deviation dosage 700 +/- 232 microg/kg/min) there was a significant percent decrease in heart rate and systolic and diastolic blood pressures from postoperative values. Esmolol dose was significantly associated with percent reduction in systolic blood pressure. Final esmolol dose and total body clearance were significantly higher in patients after coarctation repair. There were significant associations between esmolol dose and esmolol blood concentrations at steady state.

CONCLUSIONS

The dosage required to control hypertension in patients after repair of aortic coarctation was higher than patients who underwent repair of other congenital heart defects. Esmolol was effective in controlling blood pressure in 19 of 20 patients without adverse effects.

Mechanisms and medical management of patients with atrial flutter

Type I atrial flutter is due to reentrant excitation, principally in the right atrium. The standard ECG remains the cornerstone for its clinical diagnosis. Acute treatment should be directed at control of the ventricular response rate and, if possible, restoration of sinus rhythm. Radiofrequency catheter ablation therapy provides the best hope of cure, although atrial fibrillation may subsequently occur after an ostensibly successful ablative procedure. Alternatively, antiarrhythmic drug therapy to suppress recurrent atrial flutter episodes may be useful, recognizing that occasional recurrences are common despite therapy. Radiofrequency ablation of the His bundle ablation with placement of an appropriate pacemaker system may be useful in selected patients.

Symptomatic and hemodynamic recovery following dobutamine stress echo: benefit of low-dose esmolol administration

OBJECTIVES

We studied the use of esmolol in patients experiencing minor side effects of palpitations, anxiety, nervousness, and tremors associated with dobutamine stress echocardiography.

BACKGROUND

Dobutamine stress echocardiography is frequently used in the assessment of coronary artery disease. Esmolol administration may enhance patient comfort.

METHODS

Sixty consecutive patients who experienced minor side-effects during dobutamine stress echocardiography were given 0.3 mg/kg esmolol intravenously in the recovery period and compared retrospectively to sixty consecutive controls who underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography, who did not receive esmolol, during the same time period. Both groups were matched for age, ejection fraction, and peak dose of dobutamine. Heart rate and blood pressure were assessed during and after dobutamine administration.

RESULTS

Both groups had similar baseline blood pressure (mmHg) (142 +/- 19/72 +/- 14 vs 139 +/- 20/72 +/- 14) and heart rate (beats per minute) (75 +/- 14 vs 75 +/- 17) (esmolol and control respectively, p = ns), but peak heart rate was higher in the esmolol group (126 +/- 14 vs. 116 +/- 14, p < 0.01). In the group who received esmolol, symptomatic relief paralleled the statistically significant decrease in heart rate which occurred within 1 minute of esmolol administration (99.7 +/- 15.3 vs 108.5 +/- 13.1 p < 0.0001); the heart rate in the esmolol group remained significantly lower than the control group for 5 minutes following esmolol administration (92.0 +/- 10.3 vs 96.7 +/- 11.8 p < 0.05). As a percentage of peak heart rate the esmolol group remained significantly lower than the control for 7 minutes (74% vs 80% p < 0.05). Esmolol induced a significant reversal of dobutamine-induced diastolic hypotension (diastolic blood pressure at peak 66 +/- 17 vs 8 min recovery 70 +/- 12, p < 0.03) that was not seen in controls (diastolic blood pressure at peak 64 +/- 18 vs 8 min recovery 65 +/- 14, p = ns). Systolic blood pressure and heart rate remained elevated in both groups 8 min into recovery compared to baseline, suggesting persistent dobutamine effect beyond the expected 2 min pharmacologic half-life of dobutamine. No side-effects from esmolol were seen despite it being used in 9 patients with EF < 35%.

CONCLUSIONS

Esmolol is effective and well tolerated for the management of dobutamine-related minor side-effects. The mechanism of benefit, in addition to heart rate reduction, may involve a reversal of dobutamine-induced diastolic hypotension. Blood pressure and heart rate recovery are slower than expected from previously published pharmacokinetic data.

Esmolol. A review of its therapeutic efficacy and pharmacokinetic characteristics

Esmolol is an ultra short-acting intravenous cardioselective beta-antagonist. It has an extremely short elimination half-life (mean: 9 minutes; range: 4 to 16 minutes) and a total body clearance [285 ml/min/kg (17.1 L/h/kg)] approaching 3 times cardiac output and 14 times hepatic blood flow. The alpha-distribution half-life is approximately 2 minutes. When esmolol is administered as a bolus followed by a continuous infusion, onset of activity occurs within 2 minutes, with 90% of steady-state beta-blockade occurring within 5 minutes. Full recovery from beta-blockade is observed 18 to 30 minutes after terminating the infusion. Esmolol blood concentrations are undetectable 20 to 30 minutes postinfusion. The elimination of esmolol is independent of renal or hepatic function as it is metabolised by red blood cell cytosol esterases to an acid metabolite and methanol. The acid metabolite, which is renally eliminated, has 1500-fold less activity than esmolol. Methanol concentrations remain within the range of normal endogenous levels. Clinically, esmolol is used for the following: (i) situations where a brief duration of adrenergic blockade is required, such as tracheal intubation and stressful surgical stimuli; and (ii) critically ill or unstable patients in whom the dosage of esmolol is easily titrated to response and adverse effects are rapidly managed by termination of the infusion. In adults, bolus doses of 100 to 200mg are effective in attenuating the adrenergic responses associated with tracheal intubation and surgical stimuli. For the control of supraventricular arrhythmias, acute postoperative hypertension and acute ischaemic heart disease, doses of < 300 micrograms/kg/min, administered by continuous intravenous infusion, are used. The principal adverse effect of esmolol is hypotension (incidence of 0 to 50%), which is frequently accompanied with diaphoresis. The incidence of hypotension appears to increase with doses exceeding 150 micrograms/kg/min and in patients with low baseline blood pressure. Hypotension infrequently requires any intervention other than decreasing the dose or discontinuing the infusion. Symptoms generally resolve within 30 minutes after discontinuing the drug. In surgical and critical care settings where clinical conditions are rapidly changing, the pharmacokinetic profile of esmolol allows the drug to provide rapid pharmacological control and minimises the potential for serious adverse effects.

Differential effect of esmolol on the fast and slow AV nodal pathways in patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia

INTRODUCTION

AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) usually involves anterograde conduction over a slowly conducting ("slow") pathway and retrograde conduction over a rapidly conducting ("fast") pathway. A variety of drugs, such as beta blockers, digitalis, and calcium channel blockers, have been reported to prolong AV nodal refractoriness in both the anterograde and retrograde limbs of the circuit. However, few data are available that address whether the fast and slow pathways respond in a quantitatively different manner to drugs such as beta-adrenergic antagonists. In addition, it is not known whether the effects of these agents on refractoriness parallel the effects on conduction in the fast and slow pathways. The present study was performed to measure the effect of the intravenous beta-adrenergic agent, esmolol, on refractoriness and conduction in both the fast and slow AV nodal pathways in patients with AVNRT.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Thirteen patients with discontinuous AV nodal conduction properties and typical AVNRT were studied. Anterograde and retrograde AV nodal functional assessment was performed at baseline and following steady-state drug infusion of intravenous esmolol at a dose of 500 micrograms/kg for 1 minute, 150 micrograms/kg per minute for the next 4 minutes, followed by a continuous maintenance infusion of 50 to 100 micrograms/kg per minute. The anterograde effective refractory period of the fast pathway increased from 381 +/- 75 msec at baseline to 453 +/- 92 msec during the infusion of esmolol (P = 0.003). The anterograde effective refractory period of the slow pathway was also prolonged by esmolol, from 289 +/- 26 msec to 310 +/- 17 msec (P = 0.005). However, the absolute magnitude of the change in the anterograde effective refractory period of the fast pathway (+72 +/- 59 msec) was significantly greater than the change in anterograde effective refractory period of the slow pathway (+21 +/- 16 msec, P = 0.01). The mean retrograde effective refractory period of the fast pathway increased from 276 +/- 46 msec to 376 +/- 61 msec during esmolol infusion (P = 0.03). Retrograde slow pathway conduction that could not be demonstrated at baseline became manifest in three patients during esmolol infusion. In contrast to the effects of esmolol on refractoriness, the AH interval during anterograde slow pathway conduction prolonged to a far greater extent (+84 msec) than the HA interval associated with retrograde fast pathway conduction (+5 msec, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

The beta-adrenergic antagonist, esmolol, has a quantitatively greater effect on anterograde refractoriness of the fast than the slow AV nodal pathway. However, the effects on conduction intervals during AVNRT are greater in the anterograde slow pathway than in the retrograde fast pathway. These observations suggest that the fast and slow pathways may have differential sensitivities to autonomic influences. This difference in the response to beta-adrenergic antagonists may be exploited as a clinically useful method for demonstrating slow pathway conduction in some individuals with AVNRT.

Coronary artery operation supported by the Hemopump: an experimental study on pig

Twelve pigs undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting had the Hemopump to decompress the heart and as circulatory support. The pigs also were given a short-acting beta-blocker, esmolol, to make the heart flaccid. Extracorporeal circulation was not used. During Hemopump support, a bolus dose of 0.5 to 5 mg/kg of esmolol was given before incremental titration steps from 100 to 600 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 over 15 to 20 minutes. The internal thoracic artery was sutured to the distal part of the left anterior descending artery. The Hemopump was withdrawn to the aorta after a weaning period of 20 to 30 minutes. Seven of 12 pigs went through the whole procedure and the Hemopump was weaned off without complications. Five animals died due to right ventricular failure in association with esmolol administration. There was a big interindividual difference in esmolol dose-response curves in the surviving animals. No significant differences in the hemodynamic variables were observed during the experiment. The Hemopump in combination with a short-acting beta-blocker could be an alternate way of performing coronary artery bypass grafting in selected patients.

Effectiveness and costs of digoxin treatment for atrial fibrillation and flutter

Clinical outcomes and costs associated with the use of digoxin in atrial fibrillation and flutter were evaluated in a prospective, observational study at 18 academic medical centers in the United States. Data were collected on 115 patients (aged > 18 years) with atrial fibrillation or flutter who were treated with digoxin for rapid ventricular rate (> or = 120 beats/min). The median time to ventricular rate control (i.e., resting ventricular rate < 100 beats/min, decrease in ventricular rate of > 20%, or sinus rhythm) was 11.6 hours from the first dose of digoxin for all evaluable patients (n = 105) and 9.5 hours for those only receiving digoxin (n = 64). Before ventricular rate control, the mean +/- SD dose of digoxin administered was 0.80 +/- 0.74 mg, and a mean of 1.4 +/- 1.8 serum digoxin concentrations were ordered per patient. Concomitant beta-blocker or calcium antagonist therapy was instituted in 47 patients (41%); in 19 of these, combination therapy was initiated within 2 hours. Adenosine was administered to 13 patients (11%). Patients spent a median of 4 days (range 1 to 25) in the hospital; 28% spent time in a coronary/intensive care unit and 79% in a telemetry bed. Loss of control (i.e., resting ventricular rate returned to > 120 beats/min) occurred at least once in 50% of patients and was associated with a longer hospital stay (p < 0.05). Based on 1991 data, the estimated mean hospital bed cost for patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter was $3,169 +/- $3,174.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Esmolol in the Treatment of Multifocal Atrial Tachycardia

Multifocal atrial tachycardia (MAT) is a supraventricular tachydysrhythmia precipitated by a number of pharmacologic and physiologic disturbances. Corrections of these disturbances should take precedence in the treatment of MAT.

Cardiovascular and antiarrhythmic effects of esmolol in children

This prospective study evaluated the cardiovascular and antiarrhythmic effects of esmolol, an intravenous beta-blocker with an extremely short half-life. Twenty patients (aged 2 to 16 years) underwent diagnostic electrophysiologic studies at rest and during beta-blockade induced with esmolol. An initial dose of 600 micrograms/kg was infused for 2 minutes and followed by an infusion of 200 micrograms/kg per minute. The dosage was increased by 50 to 100 micrograms/kg per minute every 5 to 10 minutes until a reduction of greater than 10% in either heart rate or mean blood pressure was seen. The dosage required to achieve beta-blockade ranged from 300 to 1000 micrograms/kg per minute (mean 550 micrograms/kg per minute). Electrophysiologic effects included a decrease in the rate of sinoatrial node discharge and delay in conduction through the atrioventricular node. There was no effect on His-Purkinje conduction. Atrial and ventricular effective refractory periods were unchanged. In six patients with supraventricular tachycardia, esmolol prevented induction of tachycardia in four and slowed the rate of the tachycardia in two. In four patients with ventricular tachycardia, clinical findings were improved in three and unchanged in one. Heart rate and blood pressure returned to near baseline values 10 minutes after the esmolol infusion was stopped. Adverse ventricular electrophysiologic effects were observed in two patients with biopsy evidence of myocarditis. No other adverse effects were seen. We conclude that the effects of esmolol in children are similar to those of other beta-blockers and that it is useful in the evaluation and management of pediatric tachyarrhythmias. The weight-adjusted dosage required to induce beta-blockade in children is larger than the adult dosage, and the effects of esmolol dissipate rapidly.

Experience with esmolol for the treatment of cocaine-associated cardiovascular complications

The authors report their experience using esmolol, an ultra-short acting beta-adrenergic antagonist, for the treatment of seven patients with cocaine-associated cardiovascular complications. No consistent hemodynamic benefit was found with the use of this drug. Although there was a decline in mean heart rate of 23% (range 0% to 35%), they were unable to show a consistent antihypertensive response. Adverse effects occurred in three patients. This included one patient with a marked exacerbation of hypertension and one who became hypotensive. Another patient developed emesis and lethargy during esmolol therapy and required endotracheal intubation. They do not recommend the routine use of esmolol for cocaine cardiotoxicity.

Rapid-acting parenteral antihypertensive agents

Parenteral antihypertensive agents are useful in those clinical situations where rapid reduction of blood pressure is necessary or where treatment with oral antihypertensive medications is not feasible. Given the diverse selection of parenteral antihypertensive drugs now available, therapy can be individualized. The presence of concurrent diseases will often influence the decision-making process regarding choice of an agent. Complications of parenteral antihypertensive therapy can arise from the intrinsic properties of the various drugs or the development of severe hypotension. Gradual lowering of blood pressure, in conjunction with careful clinical evaluation, will minimize the risks of acute parenteral antihypertensive therapy. Given that parenteral antihypertensive therapy often needs to be replaced by oral therapy, those drugs that can be used both parenterally and orally may have an advantage.

Recent antiarrhythmic drugs

Clinical failure of antiarrhythmic drugs often occurs in practice. Therefore, there is a need for new, effective and long-acting drugs with a wide therapeutic range and a low level of toxicity. Most new class I compounds block the fast sodium ion inward current of myocardial cells. According to their effects on the recovery kinetics of the sodium ion channel, these drugs are classified into 3 groups: IA (intermediate--cibenzoline, pirmenol, hydroxy-3-S-dihydroquinidine, quinacainol); IB (fast--tocainide, moricizine); IC (slow--flecainide, encainide, propafenone, lorcainide, indecainide, recainam and penticainide). Class IC drugs greatly depress intracardiac conduction and are the most potent antiarrhythmic compounds able to suppress ventricular premature beats. However, it is doubtful that long-term suppression of ventricular arrhythmias will improve survival of the patients. Some new drugs have been developed belonging to other classes: class II, esmolol, a new ultrashort-acting beta blocker; class III, N-acetyl-procainamide and sotalol, which prolong duration of the action potential and increase ventricular refractoriness; class IV, the mixed sodium ion-calcium ion-potassium ion antagonist, bepridil. The pharmacologic properties and the clinical effects of these new antiarrhythmic drugs are reviewed. However, future therapeutic trends will depend on the results of large multicenter clinical secondary prevention trials such as the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial. New antiarrhythmic drugs with original electrophysiologic profiles and minimal adverse effects must prove their ability not only to suppress arrhythmias but also to reduce sudden cardiac death rate.

Use of an ultrashort-acting beta-receptor blocker (esmolol) in patients with acute myocardial ischemia and relative contraindications to beta-blockade therapy

The hemodynamic responses to esmolol, an ultrashort-acting (t1/2 = 9 min) beta 1-adrenergic receptor antagonist, were examined in 16 patients with myocardial ischemia and compromised left ventricular function as evidenced by a mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure of 15 to 25 mm Hg. Esmolol was infused intravenously to a maximal dose of 300 micrograms/kg body weight per min for less than or equal to 48 h in 16 patients: 9 with acute myocardial infarction, 6 with periinfarction angina and 1 with acute unstable angina. The sinus rate and systolic arterial pressure declined rapidly in all patients from baseline values of 99 +/- 12 beats/min and 126 +/- 19 mm Hg to 80 +/- 14 beats/min (p less than 0.05) and 107 +/- 20 mm Hg (p less than or equal to 0.05) during esmolol treatment. Rate-pressure product decreased by 33% and cardiac index by 14% during esmolol treatment, but pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was not significantly altered by drug infusion (19 +/- 3 mm Hg at baseline versus 19 +/- 5 during treatment, p = NS). In all patients there was a rapid return toward baseline hemodynamic measurements within 15 min of stopping administration of esmolol, and virtually complete resolution of drug effect was evident within approximately 30 min. During infusion of esmolol, four of nine patients receiving intravenous nitroglycerin required downward adjustment of nitroglycerin infusion rate to maintain systolic blood pressure greater than 90 mm Hg.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Efficacy of esmolol in the treatment and transfer of patients with supraventricular tachyarrhythmias to alternate oral antiarrhythmic agents

The efficacy and safety of esmolol, a titratable intravenous beta-adrenergic blocking agent with a short elimination half-life (t 1/2 = 9.0 min) was evaluated in a multicenter open-label study for the treatment of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (heart rate greater than 100 bpm). The study also investigated the feasibility of transferring patients from esmolol to alternate oral antiarrhythmic agents without loss of therapeutic response. Of the 113 patients studied, 95 (84%) achieved therapeutic response (reduction in heart rate of 15% or more or conversion to sinus rhythm). Most of these patients (93%) achieved the therapeutic response at esmolol doses of 200 micrograms/kg/min or lower. Transfer from esmolol to an oral antiarrhythmic agent(s) was studied in 76 patients. Alternate antiarrhythmic agents used in this study were digoxin (N = 25), propranolol (N = 21), verapamil (N = 10), metoprolol (N = 11), quinidine (N = 2), and a combination of two antiarrhythmic agents (N = 7). Sixty-seven (88%) patients were successfully transferred to oral antiarrhythmic agents without loss of the therapeutic response obtained with esmolol. The most frequent adverse effect observed during the study was hypotension, which resolved quickly (16 +/- 14 min) either by decreasing the dose or by discontinuation of esmolol infusion. This study supports previous observations concerning the safety and efficacy of esmolol in the treatment of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. Furthermore, it demonstrates that the majority of patients successfully treated with esmolol can be safely and effectively transferred to oral therapy with alternate antiarrhythmic agents.

Controlled beta-receptor blockade with esmolol and flestolol

Beta-receptor-blocking agents are commonly used in the management of various cardiovascular diseases. Recently, esmolol, a pharmacokinetically novel cardioselective beta-receptor-blocking agent, has been introduced for use in the treatment of critically ill patients. It is devoid of intrinsic sympathomimetic activity and in doses used clinically, it has no direct depressant effect on the heart. Esmolol is an ester and is metabolized by choline-esterase to ASL 8123, an inactive molecule. Esmolol has an elimination half-life of nine minutes which accounts for its ultrashort duration of action. This unique pharmacokinetic property provides two advantages over other longer-acting beta-receptor-blocking agents. First, the magnitude of beta-receptor blockade can be titrated to a desired level. Second, if adverse effects are experienced, reducing the dosage or terminating the infusion results in rapid reversal of its pharmacological effects. Another ultrashort-acting, non-cardioselective beta-receptor blocking agent, flestolol is undergoing clinical evaluation. Esmolol has been approved for the management of supraventricular tachycardia. The clinical safety of these novel drugs will expand the use of beta-receptor-blocking agents in the management of cardiovascular diseases in critically ill patients.

Esmolol: safety and efficacy in postoperative cardiothoracic patients with supraventricular tachyarrhythmias

Esmolol, an intravenous, ultrashort-acting beta-blocker, was studied for its ability to safely control supraventricular arrhythmias up to 24 hours in 15 postoperative cardiothoracic surgery patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter and rapid ventricular response. Esmolol obtained an initial therapeutic response in nine (60 percent) patients. Mean heart rate for the 15 patients was reduced from 139 +/- 12 beats/min before therapy to 106 +/- 21 beats/min during esmolol infusion (p less than 0.01). The mean time to a therapeutic response after initiation of therapy, using a multistep titration regimen (500 micrograms/kg/min loading infusions over one minute, prior to incremental titration steps from 50 to 300 micrograms/kg/min over 4 to 14 minutes), was 22 +/- 9 minutes, and therapy was continued for 17 +/- 9 hours in responders. Esmolol significantly lowered blood pressure in the group studied and resulted in mild supine or orthostatic hypotension in ten (67 percent) patients. Side effects, including hypotension (10/15 patients), gastrointestinal disturbances (2/15), and weakness or somnolence (6/15), were transient and were not associated with serious clinical sequelae. We conclude that esmolol is effective for rate control in a majority of postoperative cardiothoracic surgery patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter. Side effects, although mild, occur relatively frequently, limiting prolonged infusions and warranting close surveillance of patients.

Hemodynamic effects of flestolol, a titratable short-acting intravenous beta-adrenergic receptor blocker

The hemodynamic effects of flestolol were evaluated in 30 patients undergoing routine cardiac catheterization. Hemodynamic measurements were obtained during baseline (prior to flestolol), at steady state during IV flestolol infusion (1, 5, and 10 micrograms/kg/min) and at 20 to 30 minutes after discontinuation (postinfusion). Flestolol-induced hemodynamic changes were similar to those induced by other beta blockers without intrinsic sympathomimetic activity. Significant dose-dependent reduction in heart rate, rate pressure product, and increase in peripheral vascular resistance were seen. Flestolol produced clinically insignificant decrease in myocardial contractility as shown by slight decrease in LVdp/dt, CI, and LVEF. Hemodynamic data from patients with paced heart rate, further confirms a direct mild cardiac depressant effect of flestolol, a finding common to other beta blockers. Consistent with the short elimination half-life of flestolol (t1/2 = 6.5 minutes), most of the hemodynamic changes rapidly returned to preinfusion level within 20 to 30 minutes following its discontinuation. Thus flestolol, with its unique pharmacokinetic profile and titrability, may be beneficial in the treatment of critically ill patients.

Ultra-short-acting beta-adrenergic blockers

The ultra-short-acting beta-adrenergic blockers are parenteral agents that can be rapidly titrated in clinical situations where immediate beta-adrenergic blockade is warranted. The effects of those drugs rapidly dissipate after termination of treatment, providing an important safety feature. Esmolol, the prototype drug of this class, is approved for treatment of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias but also has potential use in treatment of patients with perioperative hypertension and acute myocardial ischemia.

Esmolol: a titratable short-acting intravenous beta blocker for acute critical care settings

Esmolol (Brevibloc) is an intravenous, short-acting, titratable, cardioselective beta blocker with a very rapid onset and offset of action (t1/2 = 9.2 minutes). Esmolol-induced beta blockade can be maintained as long as infusion is continued. It exhibits neither intrinsic sympathomimetic activity nor significant membrane-stabilizing activity. It is rapidly metabolized by an esterase in the erythrocyte cytosol to an inactive acid metabolite. Its hemodynamic and electrophysiologic effects are similar to those of other beta blockers. Unlike the effects of other beta blockers, however, the effects of esmolol dissipate rapidly to baseline within 30 minutes after its discontinuation. Evidence obtained from clinical studies indicates that esmolol is effective and safe in reducing the ventricular rate in patients with supraventricular tachyarrhythmias, and in reducing the heart rate in patients with acute myocardial infarction and/or unstable angina. Esmolol has also been shown to be effective and safe in attenuating the tachycardia and hypertension seen during the intraoperative period. Data from postoperative patients indicate that esmolol is ideal as sole-agent therapy for the treatment of moderate postoperative hypertension associated with a hyperdynamic state. The short duration of action and titratability of esmolol make it an ideal drug for use in patients in whom the clinical need for beta blockade is limited in duration, and it offers additional safety in patients in whom beta blockade is beneficial; however, it might be precluded because of coexisting contraindications. To date, experience with esmolol in over 1200 patients has been gathered, and the adverse effect profile is basically similar to that reported here.

Hemodynamic effects of esmolol, an ultrashort-acting beta blocker

The hemodynamic effects of esmolol were evaluated in 12 male patients at rest (mean age, 51 +/- 10 years) undergoing routine cardiac catheterization. Hemodynamic measurements were obtained during baseline (prior to esmolol), at steady state (during an intravenous infusion of esmolol 300 micrograms/kg/min), and at 30 minutes after stopping esmolol (postinfusion). Esmolol produced hemodynamic effects similar to the effects of other beta blockers. Significant reductions in rate-pressure product (mean decrease, 15%), cardiac index (mean decrease, 17%), stroke volume index (mean decrease, 13%), left ventricular stroke work index (mean decrease, 20%), and left ventricular ejection fraction (mean decrease, 18%) were observed. In contrast to other beta blockers, all hemodynamic effects of esmolol had returned to baseline values within 30 minutes after the infusion stopped. One patient exhibited hypotension during the esmolol infusion; this episode resolved without sequelae after discontinuation of esmolol. In summary, the effects of esmolol at rest on hemodynamic parameters and left ventricular function are similar to other beta-adrenergic blocking agents. Due to its ultrashort half-life, esmolol can be administered safely in critically ill patients whose disease status makes treatment with currently available beta blockers risky.