Newer antiarrhythmic drugs in children

Effectiveness and safety of mexiletine in patients at risk for (recurrent) ventricular arrhythmias: a systematic review

While mexiletine has been used for over 40 years for prevention of (recurrent) ventricular arrhythmias and for myotonia, patient access has recently been critically endangered. Here we aim to demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of mexiletine in the treatment of patients with (recurrent) ventricular arrhythmias, emphasizing the absolute necessity of its accessibility. Studies were included in this systematic review (PROSPERO, CRD42020213434) if the efficacy or safety of mexiletine in any dose was evaluated in patients at risk for (recurrent) ventricular arrhythmias with or without comparison with alternative treatments (e.g. placebo). A systematic search was performed in Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and in the clinical trial registry databases ClinicalTrials.gov and ICTRP. Risk of bias were assessed and tailored to the different study designs. Large heterogeneity in study designs and outcome measures prompted a narrative synthesis approach. In total, 221 studies were included reporting on 8970 patients treated with mexiletine. Age ranged from 0 to 88 years. A decrease in ventricular arrhythmias of >50% was observed in 72% of the studies for pre-mature ventricular complexes, 64% for ventricular tachycardia, and 33% for ventricular fibrillation. Electrocardiographic effects of mexiletine were small; only in a subset of patients with primary arrhythmia syndromes, a relative (desired) QTc decrease was reproducibly observed. As for adverse events, gastrointestinal complaints were most frequently observed (33% of the patients). In this systematic review, we present all the currently available knowledge of mexiletine in patients at risk for (recurrent) ventricular arrhythmias and show that mexiletine is both effective and safe.

Molecular basis for exaggerated sensitivity to mexiletine in the cardiac isoform of the fast Na channel

Cardiac sodium channels have been shown to have a higher sensitivity to local anesthetic agents, such as lidocaine, than the sodium channels of other tissues. To examine if this is also true for mexiletine, we have systematically measured mexiletine sensitivity of the Na channel isoforms, rH1, (mu)1, and rBII, which were transiently expressed in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells. We confirmed that the cardiac isoform rH1 exhibited the highest sensitivity among the three tested channel isoforms. In rH1, (mu)1, and rBII, the respective IC(50) values were 62, 294, and 308 microM mexiletine, in regard to tonic block, and 18, 54, and 268 microM mexiletine, in relation to use (8 Hz)-dependent block. The relatively high drug sensitivity of rH1 was an invariant finding, irrespective of channel state or whether channels were subjected to infrequent or frequent depolarizing stimuli. Mutating specific amino acids in the skeletal muscle isoform (mu)1 (namely, (mu)1-I433V and (mu)1-S251A) to those of the cardiac isoform at putative binding sites for local anesthetic agents revealed that only one of the point mutations ((mu)1-S251A) has relevance to the high cardiac drug sensitivity, because mexiletine produced significantly more use-dependent and tonic block in (mu)1-S251A than wild-type (mu)1.

Inherited muscle and brain channelopathies

In the past 5 years, advances in the complementary fields of neurogenetics and cellular electrophysiology have resulted in an explosion of knowledge about a group of disorders now known as the neurological channelopathies. These advances have resulted in more accurate DNA-based diagnosis and have increased our understanding of cellular pathophysiology. This is leading to more tailored therapies for patients with these disorders.

Pharmacologic management of supraventricular tachycardias in children. Part 2: Atrial flutter, atrial fibrillation, and junctional and atrial ectopic tachycardia

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature regarding the use of antiarrhythmic agents in the management of atrial flutter (AF), atrial fibrillation (Afib), junctional ectopic tachycardia (JET), and atrial ectopic tachycardia (AET) in infants and children. To discuss the advantages and disadvantages of specific agents in each type of arrhythmia in an effort to develop treatment guidelines.

DATA SOURCE

A MEDLINE search encompassing the years 1966-1996 was used to identify pertinent literature for discussion. Additional references were found in the articles, which were retrieved via MEDLINE.

STUDY SELECTION

Clinical trials that address the use of antiarrhythmic agents for the treatment of supraventricular tachycardia, AF, Afib, JET, and AET in children were selected. Literature pertaining to dosage, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and toxicity of antiarrhythmic agents in children were considered for possible inclusion in the review; information judged to be pertinent by the authors was included in the discussion.

DATA EXTRACTION

Although there are numerous reports of antiarrhythmic use in children, there are very few large studies designed that evaluate the use of specific antiarrhythmic agents in the treatment of AF, Afib, JET, or AET. Ideally, controlled clinical trials are used to develop clinical guidelines; however, in this situation, most data and information must be obtained from case series of children treated. Although the results from these types of studies may be useful in developing guidelines for the optimal use of these agents for the treatment of AF, Afib, JET, and AET, controlled trials are required for establishing standard treatment guidelines for all patients.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Despite limited scientific evaluation of conventional agents in the treatment of AF, Afib, JET, or AET in children, they continue to be the standards of care. Most information regarding the use of conventional agents in children has been extrapolated from the adult literature. Little justification for the use of the agents or dosing in children is available. Controlled trials regarding the use of newer antiarrhythmic agents (propafenone, amiodarone, flecainide) are available; however, the variance in dosing schemes, presence of structural heart disease, and patient age may confound the results.

CONCLUSIONS

Because of greater clinical experience, conventional antiarrhythmic agents generally remain as first-line therapy in the management of most supraventricular tachycardias in children. Atrial pacing or cardioversion to reestablish sinus rhythm is indicated for initial episodes of AF in infants, followed by chronic prophylactic therapy in those with significant structural heart disease or in infants in whom AF recurs. Attempts to eliminate AF in children outside the neonatal or infancy period should begin with trials of traditional agents such as digoxin or procainamide, and if unsuccessful, subsequent trials of amiodarone. Digoxin and beta-blockers remain the mainstay of therapy for children with Afib, followed by procainamide for treatment failures. Intravenous amiodarone, the newest addition to our antiarrhythmic armamentarium, is the most promising agent in the treatment of postoperative JET. This arrhythmia has been traditionally managed with corporal cooling and/or digoxin therapy; however, intravenous amiodarone may now be a valuable option. Although relatively unsuccessful in the management of congenital JET and AET, conventional agents are typically used prior to the initiation of long-term therapy with potentially more toxic agents such as amiodarone or propafenone. Additional well-designed, controlled trials are needed to further evaluate the comparative efficacy of agents such as flecainide, sotalol, moricizine, propafenone, and amiodarone in the management of AF, Afib, JET, and AET in children, as well as to evaluate the dosing and toxicity in various age groups.

Experience with moricizine HCl in children with supraventricular tachycardia

Eight children, age between 4.5 and 19 years were treated with moricizine for supraventricular tachycardia during the last 3 years. The tachycardia was documented by surface electrocardiogram (ECG), and/or by ambulatory ECG in all the children and the mechanism of tachycardia was determined by previously published surface ECG and electrophysiologic criteria in all but one child. Of the eight children, three had atrial ectopic tachycardia, three had automatic junctional ectopic tachycardia, one had atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentry tachycardia and one had atrial reentry. All the children except one had failed trial of two or more antiarrhythmic drugs prior to moricizine therapy. The duration of moricizine therapy ranged from 4 days to 25 months. In three of the eight children (patients 3, 5 and 7), who presented with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, automatic junctional ectopic tachycardia and atrial ectopic tachycardia, respectively, moricizine therapy was effective in restoring sinus rhythm and controlling the clinical tachycardia. Only one child (patient 1) developed proarrhythmia, an episode of fast, narrow-QRS supraventricular tachycardia lasting for 30 s, on the third day of therapy. This was subsequently confirmed by electrophysiologic study to be AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. The other side effects noted were non-cardiac, not dose-dependant and did not require dis-continuation of therapy. Based on our small series and those of others, moricizine, a newer class I anti-arrhythmic agent, has a limited but useful role in the management of recalcitrant type of supraventricular tachycardia, such as ectopic atrial and junctional tachycardia in children.

Propafenone: an effective agent for the management of supraventricular arrhythmias

Propafenone is a sodium channel blocking antiarrhythmic drug. It also has beta-adrenergic, potassium channel, and weak calcium channel blocking activity. The drug is metabolized in the liver with rates dependent on the debrisoquin phenotype. The saturable metabolism results in nonlinear pharmacokinetics. The metabolites retain sodium channel blocking activity but little beta-adrenergic blocking activity. Both controlled and noncontrolled studies have documented its efficacy in a variety of supraventricular arrhythmias. Intravenous propafenone is effective in converting atrial fibrillation to normal sinus rhythm. Chronic oral administration decreases the frequency of recurrence of atrial fibrillation and paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. The drug is particularly effective in the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. The drug may produce SA block in patients with underlying sinus node dysfunction. Propafenone has comparatively few noncardiac side effects. It is a useful primary drug or an alternative to more commonly used drugs used for the treatment of supraventricular arrhythmias.

Amiodarone in a newborn with ventricular tachycardia and an intracardiac tumor: adjusting the dose according to an individualized dosing regimen

We report the successful management of recurrent ventricular tachycardias in a newborn suffering from an intracardiac tumor. Amiodarone was the only agent able to control the tachycardias and did so as long as an individually titrated plasma concentration above 0.8 mu mol/L was maintained. Because no therapeutic plasma concentration has been defined in children and no kinetic studies are available in this population, we optimized the dosing regimen based on a computer simulation, taking into account the pharmacokinetic parameters of the patient and the individual concentration-effect relation.

Pharmacokinetics of moricizine in young patients

Moricizine is a novel phenothiazine antiarrhythmic agent that depresses the activity of ectopic foci, has a low incidence of adverse effects relative to other agents, and is useful in treating pediatric atrial ectopic tachycardia. A study was conducted to determine the pharmacokinetics of moricizine in children after oral administration. Moricizine was isolated from frozen serum obtained from four male patients (ages 7, 8, 9, and 18 years) receiving the drug for supraventricular tachycardia and analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection according to an established protocol. Peak serum levels were between 400 and 2000 ng/mL. Elimination of moricizine did not follow simple single-compartment pharmacokinetics. In three patients we observed an increase or slower decline in blood level occurring after 4 hours. Because of the paroxysmal nature of the tachycardias, decreases in patient heart rate could not be correlated with moricizine blood level. These results suggest that the pediatric pharmacokinetics of moricizine excretion are complex and may differ from those seen in adults.

Treatment of atrial ectopic tachycardia in infants < 6 months old

Nineteen infants < 6 months old who had atrial ectopic tachycardia (AET) were treated with antiarrhythmic drugs. AET was controlled with digoxin in 1 patient, propafenone in 2, digoxin with propafenone in 9, digoxin with amiodarone in 4, and digoxin with propafenone and amiodarone in 2; radiofrequency ablation was performed in 1 drug-resistant case. AET resolved in 14 of 15 infants within 1 year. Drug side effects occurred in 5 patients. We conclude that AET in infants < 6 months old can be successfully treated with antiarrhythmic drugs, and we recommend a three-step approach with digoxin, a class 1C antiarrhythmic drug, and a class 3 drug. Resolution of AET in infants is frequent.

Mechanism of interruption of atrial flutter by moricizine. Electrophysiological and multiplexing studies in the canine sterile pericarditis model of atrial flutter

BACKGROUND

Moricizine is said to have potent effects on cardiac conduction but little or no effect on cardiac refractoriness.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The effects of moricizine (2 mg/kg IV) on induced atrial flutter were studied 2 to 4 days after the creation of sterile pericarditis in 11 dogs. Ten episodes of stable atrial flutter before and after the administration of moricizine were studied in 9 dogs in the conscious, nonsedated state, and 7 episodes were studied in 6 dogs in the anesthetized, open chest state. In the conscious state, the effects of moricizine on atrial excitability, atrial effective refractory period, and intra-atrial conduction times were studied by recording during overdrive pacing of sinus rhythm from epicardial electrodes placed at selected atrial sites. Moricizine prolonged the atrial flutter cycle length in all the episodes, from a mean of 133 +/- 9 to 172 +/- 27 milliseconds (P < .001), and then terminated 7 of the 10 episodes. Moricizine increased the atrial threshold of excitability from a mean of 2.3 +/- 1.4 to 3.3 +/- 2.2 mA (P < .01) and prolonged intra-atrial conduction times (measured from the sulcus terminalis to the posteroinferior left atrium) from a mean of 58 +/- 6 to 64 +/- 5 milliseconds (P < .005). Prolongation of the atrial effective refractory period from 166 +/- 20 to 174 +/- 24 milliseconds (P < .05) was observed only at the sulcus terminalis site. In the open chest studies, administration of moricizine prolonged the atrial flutter cycle length from a mean of 150 +/- 15 to 216 +/- 30 milliseconds (P < .001) and then terminated the atrial flutter in all 7 episodes. As demonstrated by simultaneous multisite mapping from 95 bipolar sites on the right atrial free wall, the atrial flutter cycle length prolongation was either due to further slowing of conduction in an area of slow conduction in the reentrant circuit of the atrial flutter (5 episodes) or further slowing of conduction in an area of slow conduction plus the development of a second area of slow conduction (2 episodes). The change in conduction times in the rest of the reentrant circuit was negligible (10.9 +/- 8.7% of the total change). In all 7 episodes, the last circulating reentrant wave front blocked in an area of slow conduction.

CONCLUSIONS

Moricizine (1) prolongs the atrial flutter cycle length, primarily by slowing conduction in an area of slow conduction in the reentrant circuit, (2) terminates atrial flutter by causing block of the circulating reentrant wave front in an area of slow conduction of the reentrant circuit, and (3) effectively interrupts otherwise stable atrial flutter in this canine model. The reason for these effects of moricizine are not readily explained by its effects on global atrial conduction times and refractoriness studied during sinus rhythm. Local changes in conduction in an area(s) of slow conduction are responsible for both cycle length prolongation and atrial flutter termination rather than the traditional wavelength concept of head-tail interaction.

Moricizine: a novel antiarrhythmic agent

Moricizine is a phenothiazine derivative with Vaughan Williams class 1 antiarrhythmic properties. It undergoes extensive first-pass metabolism, has a bioavailability of 34-38 percent, and is 95 percent bound to plasma proteins. Moricizine is extensively metabolized and may have pharmacologically active metabolites. A recent clinical study has shown that moricizine is slightly less effective than encainide or flecainide in suppressing ventricular premature depolarizations. Compared with disopyramide and quinidine, moricizine was equally or more effective in suppressing ventricular premature depolarizations, couplets, and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. Further studies are needed comparing moricizine with other class 1 agents in the treatment of life-threatening arrhythmias; available data suggest that moricizine is comparable with these agents in the treatment of ventricular tachycardias and fibrillation. Moricizine appears to have a low incidence of serious adverse effects compared with other antiarrhythmics. This combination of apparently similar efficacy with a decreased incidence of adverse effects makes moricizine a worthwhile addition to currently available antiarrhythmic agents.

Long-term follow-up of amiodarone therapy in the young: continued efficacy, unimpaired growth, moderate side effects

Long-term follow-up data on young patients receiving amiodarone is lacking, especially in relation to growth and late side effects. The records of 95 young patients (mean age 12.4 years; range 3 weeks to 31.5 years) who received amiodarone were reviewed. Minimal follow-up time for those continuing to take amiodarone was 1.5 years; the mean duration of therapy was 2.3 years (maximal 6.5). The mean maintenance dosage was 7.7 (1.5 to 25) mg/kg body weight per day. Initial success (based on symptoms and 24 h electrocardiogram) was achieved in 23 of 34 patients with ventricular tachycardia, in 32 of 33 with atrial flutter and in 21 of 28 patients with supraventricular tachycardia. However, in 7 of 33 patients with atrial flutter, the arrhythmia returned after 6 months. Patient growth continued in the same percentiles achieved before amiodarone in all but eight patients, improving in six and worsening in two with severe underlying disease. Proarrhythmia occurred in three patients: one had torsade de pointes that disappeared when amiodarone administration was stopped; two with severe anatomic heart disease died suddenly during the loading period (one with atrial flutter and one with ventricular tachycardia). Side effects occurred in 28 (29%) of the 95 patients: keratopathy (in 11), abnormal thyroid function test (in 6), chemical hepatitis (in 3), rash (in 3), peripheral neuropathy (in 2), hypertension (in 1) and vomiting (in 1). All side effects disappeared when amiodarone was discontinued or the dose was reduced.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Reevaluation of digoxin-encainide interactions using an animal model

The effects of intravenous encainide on digoxin-induced atrial ectopic tachycardia (AET) were investigated in the rat using 3-channel simultaneous limb-lead electrocardiography. Pentobarbital-anesthetized (35 mg/kg, intraperitoneal) adult male rats were given digoxin subcutaneously, 30 mg/kg. After onset of AET, rats received either saline (0.5 ml/kg) or encainide; 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, or 2.0 mg/kg intravenously in repeated doses at 15-min intervals. At all doses, encainide converted digoxin-induced AET to ventricular arrhythmias, prolonged recovery time, and increased mortality in comparison to saline-treated animals. An additional group of anesthetized rats was not given digoxin. These animals received encainide (2.0 mg/kg, intravenously) in repeated doses at 15-min interval and developed dose-related increase in the P-R interval only. Blood samples were obtained by cardiac puncture from 12 additional anesthetized, digoxin-treated rats 5 min after the fourth intravenous dose of saline (0.5 ml/kg, n = 6) or encainide (1.0 mg/kg, n = 6). Serum was prepared and analyzed by affinity column-mediated immunoassay. Digoxin levels were the same in both groups. These results suggest that encainide may exacerbate digoxin-induced arrhythmias (proarrhythmic effect) in this species. In view of our findings of digoxin-encainide interactions in the rat, we recommend caution if these drugs are coadministered in humans.