Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antiarrhythmic agents in patients with congestive heart failure

Pharmacokinetic determinants for the right dose of antiarrhythmic drugs

INTRODUCTION

Antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) show a narrow therapeutic range and marked intersubject variability in pharmacokinetics (PK), which may lead to inappropriate dosing and drug toxicity.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of the present review is to describe PK properties of AADs, discussing the main changes in different clinical scenarios, such as the elderly and patients with obese, chronic kidney, liver, and cardiac disease, in order to guide their right prescription in clinical practice.

EXPERT OPINION

There are few data about PK properties of AADs in a special population or challenging clinical setting. The use and dose of AADs is commonly based on physicians' clinical experience observing the clinical effects rather than being personalized on the individual patients PK profiles. More and updated studies are needed to validate a patient centered approach in the pharmacological treatment of arrhythmias based on patients' clinical features, including pharmacogenomics, and AAD pharmacokinetics.

Evaluation of a hospital-wide vancomycin-dosing nomogram in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices

INTRODUCTION

Hemodynamic derangements due to heart failure are associated with alterations in pharmacokinetics. Although use of mechanical circulatory support mitigates such derangements, little evidence is available regarding pharmacokinetics in patients with LVADs. A previous pharmacokinetic analysis of vancomycin among patients with LVADs observed a reduced volume of distribution and clearance compared with estimates based on population kinetics.

METHODS

A total of 28 adult patients with LVADs hospitalized between January 2014 and May 2018 who received vancomycin through a pharmacist dosing consult were included. Internal medicine patients without heart failure receiving vancomycin were enrolled in a 2:1 fashion to make a control group. Exclusion criteria were unstable renal function, ESRD, acute decompensation, cardiac surgery within the preceding 5 days, or weight >110 kg.

RESULTS

No difference was observed in the proportion achieving goal trough (64% of LVAD patients vs 71% control patients, p = 0.50). However, mean trough was significantly higher among LVAD patients (23.4 mg/L vs 17.7 mg/L, p = 0.017). Furthermore, there was a significant difference in the distribution of trough levels (p = 0.025) with LVAD patients being more likely to attain levels >25 mg/L (32% vs 14%) and less likely to have troughs <10 mg/L (4% vs 14%). A numerically greater number of LVAD patients experienced nephrotoxicity but this did not reach statistical significance (32% vs 18%, p = 0.14).

CONCLUSION

The use of vancomycin in LVAD patients may result in higher trough levels when compared to internal medicine patients. Increased monitoring or conservative dosing may be warranted to improve safety and efficacy.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of drugs in cardiopulmonary associated cachexia without hepatorenal pathology: a systematic review

Cachexia not only has a dramatically harmful impact on a patient's life, but also a poor response to therapeutic agents. The purpose of the present review is to provide updated information concerning the pharmacokinetic aspects of drugs used to treat cardiopulmonary cachexia in patients with no signs of hepatic or renal pathology. A systematic search of PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Control Trials, Science Direct, and Clinical Trials Registry (ClinicalTrials.gov), encompassing the period between 2000 and 2017, was conducted in accordance to PRISMA guidelines. Seven studies were identified. Collectively, these studies included a total of 196 individuals (19 healthy subjects and 177 diseased patients). This data review found no differences in bisoprolol and prothionamide absorption in cachectic patients with chronic heart failure and tuberculosis, but higher absorption of oflaxocin in the same set of patients was observed. The distribution of bisoprolol, prothionmaide, ceftazidime, and cefipirome was reduced in cardiopulmonary cachexia patients. Hepatic clearance of rifampin was equivalent in cachectic and non-cachectic patients that had normal hepatic function. Similarly in cardiopulmonary cachexia patients, renal clearance of ceftazidime was reduced by 19% but no significant differences in bisorpolol and prothionamide clearance were observed. In the case of cefipirome, both renal clearance and creatinine clearance were higher in cachectic patients with cystic fibrosis. From the limited evidence available, the main drug pharmacokinetic changes seen in cardiopulmonary cachexia patients were a reduction in the volume of distribution and impairment of clearance.

Dosing of Vancomycin in Patients with Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices: A Clinical Pharmacokinetic Analysis

Purpose

To describe the pharmacokinetics of vancomycin in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs).

Methods

Eligible patients were ≥18 years old, implanted with a Heart Mate II CF-LVAD during January 2008-April 2012, and treated with vancomycin ≥48 hours for infection. Key exclusion criteria were unstable renal function, acute heart failure exacerbation, hemodynamic instability, and recent surgery. First-order elimination rate constant (Ke) and volume of distribution (Vd) were estimated using ideal (IBW), adjusted (AdjBW), actual (ABW), and fixed body weights. Estimated parameters were compared with measured pharmacokinetic parameters, which were calculated from steady state peak and trough vancomycin levels using one-compartment model equations.

Results

Twelve patients were included (age 44.9 ± 15 years, 91.7% male, 58.3% obese, CLcr 79.2 ± 27 mL · min-1). Common treatment indications were health-care associated pneumonia (41.7%), driveline infection (25%), and sepsis (16.7%). All methods of predicting Ke provided overestimates (p<0.05), ranging from 47 to 79%, depending on body habitus. Methods of predicting Vd using ABW in obese patients yielded overestimates of 74.5% (p<0.05), where IBW predictive Vd equations provided accurate assessments regardless of body habitus.

Conclusions

General population methods may not accurately estimate the pharmacokinetic parameters of vancomycin for compensated heart failure patients implanted with CF-LVADs.

Population pharmacokinetics of tolvaptan in healthy subjects and patients with hyponatremia secondary to congestive heart failure or hepatic cirrhosis

Tolvaptan is a selective V2 -receptor antagonist used to treat hypervolemic and euvolemic hyponatremia. A population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis was performed for tolvaptan in NONMEM® based upon data obtained from three trials conducted in 93 healthy subjects and six trials conducted in 628 congestive heart failure (CHF) patients or 24 hepatic cirrhosis patients receiving oral tolvaptan (5 to 240 mg). A two-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination best described tolvaptan PK. Relative oral bioavailability was modeled relative to 100% for a 30 mg dose and ranged from 79.4% to 122%. Body weight and the impact of CHF or hepatic cirrhosis relative to healthy subjects were statistically significant (p < 0.001) predictors of both the apparent oral clearance (CL/F) and apparent central volume of distribution (Vc /F). The CL/F was reduced to 58.2% for New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class 1 or 2 CHF, 45.5% for NYHA Class 3 or 4 CHF, and 58.0% for hepatic cirrhosis relative to healthy subjects. Vc /F was reduced to 59.9% for NYHA Class 1 or 2 CHF and 51.3% for NYHA Class 3 or 4 CHF, and was 64.8% larger for severe hepatic cirrhosis (Child-Pugh score ≥ 10) relative to healthy subjects. A slight additional decrease in CL/F of 18.3% was also detected for patients with moderate hyponatremia (serum sodium of 115-130 mEq/l) after adjusting for CHF or cirrhosis (p < 0.001). This population PK model enabled assessment of tolvaptan PK with varying degrees of CHF and hepatic cirrhosis with fluid overload and may be used to explore PK-PD relationships with respect to fluid and electrolyte balance.

Adverse drug reactions in patients with cardiovascular disease

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) occur frequently in modern medical practice, increasing morbidity and mortality and inflating the cost of care. Patients with cardiovascular disease are particularly vulnerable to ADRs due to their advanced age, polypharmacy, and the influence of heart disease on drug metabolism. The ADR potential for a particular cardiovascular drug varies with the individual, the disease being treated, and the extent of exposure to other drugs. Knowledge of this complex interplay between patient, drug, and disease is a critical component of safe and effective cardiovascular disease management. The majority of significant ADRs involving cardiovascular drugs are predictable and therefore preventable. Better patient education, avoidance of polypharmacy, and clear communication between physicians, pharmacists, and patients, particularly during the transition between the inpatient to outpatient settings, can substantially reduce ADR risk.

Single-dose pharmacokinetics of sotalol in a pediatric population with supraventricular and/or ventricular tachyarrhythmia

The pharmacokinetics (PK) of the antiarrhythmic sotalol, which elicits Class III and beta-blocking activity, has not been adequately defined in a pediatric population with tachyarrhythmias. The goal of this single-dose study with administration of sotalol HCl at a dose level of 30 mg/m2 body surface area (BSA) was to define the PK of the drug in the following four age groups: neonates (0-30 days), infants (1 month to 2 years), younger children (> 2 to < 7 years), and older children (7-12 years) with tachyarrhythmias of either supraventricular or ventricular origin. The drug was administered in an extemporaneously compounded syrup formulation prepared from the tablets containing sotalol HCl. For safety, vital signs and adverse events were recorded and the QTc interval and heart rate telemetrically monitored. Scheduled blood samples were taken over a 36-hour time interval following dose administration. The drug concentrations in plasma were measured by a sensitive and specific LC/MS/MS assay. Standard compartment model-independent methods were applied to compute the salient PK parameters of sotalol. Twenty-four clinical sites enrolled 34 patients. Thirty-three had analyzable data. Sotalol was rapidly absorbed, with mean peak concentrations occurring 2 to 3 hours after administration. The elimination of sotalol was characterized by an average half-life of between 7.4 and 9.2 hours in the four age groups. There existed statistically significant linear relationships between apparent total clearance (CL/f) or apparent volume of distribution (V lambda z/f) after oral administration and the covariates BSA, creatinine clearance (CLcr), body weight (BW), or age. The best predictors for CL/f were CLcr and BSA, whereas BW best predicted the V lambda z/f. The total area under the drug concentration-time curve in the smallest children with a BSA < 0.33 m2 was significantly greater than that in the larger children. This finding indicated that the BSA-based dose adjustment used in this study led to a larger exposure in the smallest children, whereas the exposure to the drug was similar in the larger children. The dose of 30 mg/m2 was tolerated well. No serious drug-related adverse events were reported. It can be concluded that the PK of sotalol in the pediatric patients depended only on body size, except for the neonates and smallest infants in whom the disposition of sotalol was determined by both body size and maturation of eliminatory processes.

Divergent effect of acute ventricular dilatation on the electrophysiologic characteristics of d,l-sotalol and flecainide in the isolated rabbit heart

INTRODUCTION

The interaction between acute ventricular dilatation (AVD) as one aspect of ventricular dysfunction and Class I and III antiarrhythmic drugs is uncertain. We therefore investigated the effects of AVD on the electrophysiologic properties of d,l-sotalol and flecainide.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The isolated rabbit heart was used as a model of AVD. The ventricular size and, therefore, the diastolic pressure were modified by sudden volume changes of a fluid-filled balloon placed in the left ventricle. Pacing was performed alternately using epi- and endocardial monophasic action potential (MAP)-pacing catheters at cycle lengths from 1,000 to 300 msec. d,l-Sotalol (10 microM) resulted in a significant (P < 0.05) lengthening of refractoriness (+13.5% +/- 3.1%), MAP duration (+14.9% +/- 3.2%), and QT interval (+15.5% +/- 4.1%) (mean +/- SEM at 1,000 msec). These effects had a reverse rate-dependence. AVD to a diastolic pressure of 30 mmHg reduced refractoriness and left ventricular MAP duration. In comparison with the control group with the same extent of AVD, d,l-sotalol still led to a significant prolongation of repolarization for all cycle lengths except 300 msec, so that its effects were not absolutely but relatively preserved. In contrast, flecainide (2 microM) had no significant effects on refractoriness or MAP duration. It led to a significant, rate-dependent increase of pacing thresholds (+47.6% +/- 8.2%), prolongation of QRS (+48.8% +/- 5.6%), and conduction time (+78.6% +/- 8.6%) (mean +/- SEM at 300 msec). In the flecainide group, AVD significantly increased the normal rate-dependent prolongation of QRS (+16.7% +/- 5.5%) and conduction time (+17.1% +/- 4.3%).

CONCLUSION

Our data demonstrate that, during AVD, the Class III effect of d,l-sotalol is preserved, whereas flecainide's effect of slowing conduction is exaggerated. This may contribute to flecainide-related proarrhythmia in certain clinical situations.

Arrhythmias and sudden death in heart failure

Survival of patients with heart failure has improved over the past decade due to advances in medical therapy. Sudden death continues to cause 20 to 50% of deaths. Ventricular arrhythmias are common in patients with heart failure. Ventricular hypertrophy, scars from prior myocardial infarction, sympathetic activation, and electrolyte abnormalities contribute. Some sudden deaths are due to bradyarrhythmias and electromechanical dissociation rather than ventricular arrhythmias. The risks and benefits of antiarrhythmic therapies continue to be defined. Class I antiarrhythmic drugs should be avoided due to proarrhythmic and negative inotropic effects that may increase mortality. For patients resuscitated from sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) should be considered. ICDs markedly reduce sudden death in VT/VF survivors, but in advanced heart failure, this may not markedly extend survival. Catheter or surgical ablation can be considered for selected patients with bundle branch reentry VT or difficult to control monomorphic VT. For patients who have not had sustained VT/VF antiarrhythmic therapy should generally be avoided, but may benefit some high risk patients. Amiodarone may be beneficial in patients with advanced heart failure and rapid resting heart rates. ICDs may improve survival in selected survivors of myocardial infarction who have inducible VT.

Hemodynamic and neurohormonal effects of the angiotensin II antagonist losartan in patients with congestive heart failure

BACKGROUND

Losartan is a new specific angiotensin II receptor antagonist with no agonist properties that provides the opportunity to study the consequences of angiotensin II blockade. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the hemodynamic and neurohormonal response to losartan in patients with congestive heart failure.

METHODS AND RESULTS

After baseline hemodynamic measurements using balloon-tipped pulmonary artery and radial arterial catheters, patients were randomized to receive a single dose of placebo or 5, 10, 25, 75, or 150 mg losartan in a double-blind, sequential fashion. Hemodynamic and neurohormonal parameters were then measured periodically for 24 hours. Losartan caused vasodilation in a dose-dependent manner. By the area-under-the-curve method, the reduction in the mean arterial pressure and systemic vascular resistance grew larger up to a dose of 25 mg, but the higher 75- and 150-mg doses did not produce additional vasodilation. In response to losartan, there were compensatory increases in both angiotensin II concentrations and in plasma renin activity, which were greatest at the highest doses. Aldosterone concentrations were significantly lowered with losartan.

CONCLUSIONS

Blockade of the angiotensin II receptor with the antagonist losartan causes vasodilator and neurohormonal effects in patients with congestive heart failure. The lack of additional vasodilator response with doses of more than 25 mg suggests that neurohormonal activation might limit the efficacy of high dose of losartan.

Psychopharmacologic issues in organ transplantation. Part I: Pharmacokinetics in organ failure and psychiatric aspects of immunosuppressants and anti-infectious agents

This article discusses pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics during hepatic, renal, and cardiovascular insufficiencies. Hepatic metabolism of psychotropic drugs and of drugs commonly used in transplant patients that have neuropsychiatric side effects is discussed. Neuropsychiatric effects of immunosuppressant agents, including cyclosporine, corticosteroids, azathioprine, OKT3, and FK 506, are reviewed. Certain infections occur more often in immunosuppressed patients; their treatment with antiviral, antifungal, and antibiotic drugs may have neuropsychiatric consequences. Because of altered drug sensitivities and metabolism, drug interactions, and severe medical illness, most drugs are used in reduced doses.

Drug-patient interactions and their relevance in the treatment of heart failure

The effects of congestive heart failure (CHF) on drug disposition and elimination are many and varied. Indeed, the pharmacokinetics of many of the drugs used to treat CHF are significantly altered by the patient's underlying condition. Reduced gastric emptying in CHF delays absorption and decreases the peak plasma concentrations of furosemide, bumetanide, and digoxin. Moreover, drugs that have a high hepatic extraction ratio (organic nitrates, morphine, prazosin, and hydralazine) achieve higher than expected plasma concentrations in patients with CHF. In contrast, drugs requiring biotransformation to active forms, e.g., angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors such as enalapril, perindopril, quinapril, and ramipril, generally have lower than expected plasma concentrations. Nevertheless, ACE inhibitors can impair renal function in CHF, leading to an actual increase in plasma concentrations. However, decreases in absorption and first-pass metabolism are often offset by reduced hepatic and renal clearance. The overall absorption of lisinopril may be reduced in some CHF patients; consequently, the onset of effect is delayed but is often more prolonged.

Ventricular arrhythmia in congestive heart failure

The importance of ventricular arrhythmia is based on its association with sudden death. In certain groups of patients, ventricular arrhythmia--primarily runs of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT)--is associated with an increased risk for sudden death. Although this relationship has been most often reported in patients with recent myocardial infarction, it has also been recognized in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, regardless of etiology. Therefore, ventricular arrhythmia is common in patients with CHF due to cardiomyopathy. A number of studies have reported that 70-95% of patients with cardiomyopathy and congestive heart failure (CHF) have frequent ventricular premature beats, and 40-80% will manifest runs of NSVT. Many factors are responsible for ventricular arrhythmia in such patients, including structural abnormalities, electrolyte imbalance, hemodynamic impairment, activation of neurohormonal mechanisms, and pharmacologic therapy. Many studies have reported a high yearly mortality in patients with cardiomyopathy and CHF; greater than 40% of deaths are sudden, most often the result of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia. Most studies have noted an association between presence (and frequency) of NSVT and risk of sudden cardiac death in these patients. Unfortunately, other techniques--such as the signal-averaged electrocardiogram and electrophysiologic testing--are not helpful in identifying the individual at risk. Although several drug interventions will reduce mortality from progressive CHF, these drugs have not been shown to reduce sudden death and, indeed, have a variable effect on ventricular arrhythmia. Although NSVT is a marker for increased risk for sudden death, it is uncertain if antiarrhythmic drugs will prevent this outcome. Antiarrhythmic drugs have not been shown to be effective for preventing sudden death, although there are as yet no well-controlled randomized trials. Several studies suggest that amiodarone and beta blockers are beneficial, but this requires confirmation. For patients who have been resuscitated following an episode of sudden death due to a sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia, antiarrhythmic therapy guided by invasive and noninvasive techniques appears to reduce risk of recurrent arrhythmia. However, the response rate to antiarrhythmic agents is low and side effects are common in patients with CHF. Especially important is the increased risk of precipitating CHF and aggravating the arrhythmia being treated. For many such patients who have had serious ventricular tachyarrhythmia, the automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator may prove a better option. Other drugs used for management of CHF reduce overall mortality, but not risk of sudden death.

Comparative hemodynamic effects of mexiletine and quinidine in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction

Mexiletine and quinidine are often administered to patients with severe congestive heart failure, but their hemodynamic effects have not been adequately studied in these individuals. In a randomized, crossover study, the hemodynamic responses to single oral doses of quinidine (600 mg) and mexiletine (400 mg) were compared in 20 patients with marked left ventricular dysfunction. Quinidine predominantly caused vasodilation, with mean arterial, left ventricular filling, and right atrial pressures all decreasing (-7 +/- 2, -2.3 +/- 1.0, and -1.1 +/- 0.5 mm Hg, respectively) and the systemic vascular resistance also declining (-308 +/- 84 dynes.sec.cm5). In contrast, the systemic vascular resistance increased (314 +/- 84 dynes.sec.cm-5) and the mean arterial, left ventricular filling, and right atrial pressures also increased (+2 +/- 2, +6.1 +/- 1.8, and +1.8 +/- 0.6 mm Hg, respectively) after mexiletine. Cardiac performance declined with mexiletine (cardiac and stroke work indexes decreasing -0.3 +/- 0.1 L/min/m2 and -5 +/- 1 gm.m/m2, respectively), but there was no significant change in cardiac or stroke work indexes with quinidine (+0.1 L/min/m2 and -0.3 +/- 0.9 gm.m/m2, respectively). The response to the two agents significantly differed for all parameters measured (p less than 0.005). These hemodynamic changes were accompanied by clinical effects. Mexiletine induced increased dyspnea in five patients and quinidine led to symptomatic hypotension in two patients. Plasma concentrations of mexiletine and serum concentrations of quinidine were within or below the therapeutic range in all patients. In conclusion, mexiletine and quinidine exert different hemodynamic effects when given to patients with severe congestive heart failure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Hemodynamic and neurohormonal effects of quinidine in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction secondary to coronary artery disease or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy

Quinidine causes vasodilation directly and by inhibition of adrenergic vasoconstriction, but it also exerts negative inotropic activity. Although this drug is often administered to patients with severe congestive heart failure, the net consequences of these opposing actions have not been evaluated in such patients. The hemodynamic and neurohormonal response to oral quinidine (600 mg) in 19 patients with severe chronic heart failure was therefore determined. Vasodilation was the predominant effect of quinidine, with reductions in mean arterial, left ventricular filling and right atrial pressures of -9% (confidence interval [CI] -5 to -13), -8% (CI -19 to 3), -15% (CI -26 to -4), respectively. The quinidine-induced vasodilation increased plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine concentrations by 44% (CI +17 to +72) and 47% (CI +2 to +91), respectively. No change in cardiac performance was noted, with the cardiac index slightly increased (+10%, CI +2 to +17) and stroke work index unchanged (0%, CI -11 to +11) after quinidine. Although the mean serum quinidine concentration was within the therapeutic range or lower in all patients, the serum quinidine concentration and the change in mean arterial pressure did correlate (r2 = 0.64). In conclusion, vasodilation is the predominant hemodynamic effect of oral quinidine in patients with congestive heart failure. However, potential adverse effects may be caused by consequent neurohormonal activation.

Antiarrhythmic drug therapy for congestive heart failure with focus on moricizine

Many patients who have serious ventricular arrhythmia requiring antiarrhythmic drug therapy have congestive heart failure (CHF). However, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of the antiarrhythmic drugs are altered in the presence of CHF. It has been reported that some adverse effects, primarily aggravation of arrhythmia and CHF occur more frequently in patients with a history of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. Moreover, antiarrhythmic drugs are less effective in patients with a history of CHF and a reduced LV ejection fraction (LVEF). Moricizine, a new antiarrhythmic drug, has been undergoing clinical trials for over 13 years in the United States. The data base involving 1,072 patients was analyzed to establish the effect of this agent in patients with CHF. The presence of CHF does not alter the absorption, half-life and clearance of moricizine. The incidence of CHF exacerbation definitely related to moricizine was low (2%) and occurred primarily in patients with a history of CHF. Aggravation of arrhythmia and conduction abnormalities also occurred more often in patients with prior CHF. However, the incidence of all other adverse effects involving other organ systems was the same in patients with and without CHF and was also unrelated to the baseline LVEF. The effect of moricizine for suppressing spontaneously occurring ventricular ectopy was also similar in patients with and without CHF and was independent of LVEF. However, the drug is less effective in preventing sustained ventricular arrhythmia in patients with CHF.

Effects of cardiovascular disease on pharmacokinetics

The pathophysiologic changes occurring in cardiovascular disease can affect the kinetics of drugs in several different ways. The present review examines these modifications and the underlying mechanisms. The kinetics of specific agents, such as antiarrhythmic, antihypertensive, cardiotonic, and other drugs are considered, and the clinical implications are outlined. The clinician should be aware of these modifications, because they require an adjustment of the dosage regimen. A rational basis for a correct therapeutic choice can be provided by adequate knowledge of these modifications.

Ventricular arrhythmias in congestive heart failure

Despite advances in the treatment of congestive heart failure (CHF), the mortality rate continues to be high. A large number of the deaths are sudden, presumably due to ventricular arrhythmias. Complex ventricular arrhythmias are recorded in as many as 80% of patients with CHF, with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia occurring in 40%. The latter appears to be an independent predictor of mortality. Chronic structural abnormalities responsible for CHF may be the basis for the capability of a ventricle to support life-threatening arrhythmias, which are triggered by premature ventricular contractions. The pathogenesis of arrhythmias is multifactorial. Electrolyte abnormalities, ischemia, catecholamines, inotropic and antiarrhythmic drugs may worsen arrhythmias and increase susceptibility of a ventricle to sustained arrhythmias. Beta-adrenergic blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have a beneficial effect. The role of various drugs in the pathogenesis and treatment of ventricular arrhythmias is discussed. The efficacy of antiarrhythmic therapy targeted to asymptomatic nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, in order to prevent sudden death, is controversial. Pharmacotherapy guided by electrophysiologic testing is the treatment of choice for patients who have manifest sustained ventricular tachycardia, but patients resuscitated from ventricular fibrillation may require automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

Clinical pharmacokinetics in heart failure. An updated review

Pharmacokinetics is the study of the effect that the body has on drug absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion. The pharmacokinetics of a specific drug are assessed by the volume of distribution, bioavailability, clearance and elimination half-life. Elimination half-life is directly related to the volume of distribution and inversely related to clearance. Any 1 or more of these parameters may be altered by physiological changes such as ageing, or disease states such as congestive heart failure. Congestive heart failure is associated with hypoperfusion to various organs including the sites of drug clearance, i.e. the liver and kidneys. It also leads to organ congestion as seen in the liver and gut. The main changes in drug pharmacokinetics seen in congestive heart failure are a reduction in the volume of distribution and impairment of clearance. The change in elimination half-life consequently depends on whether both clearance and the apparent volume of distribution change, and the extent of that change. Pharmacokinetic changes are not always predictable in congestive heart failure, but it seems that the net effect of reduction in the volume of distribution and impairment of clearance is that plasma concentrations of drugs are usually higher in patients with congestive heart failure than in healthy subjects. The changes in pharmacokinetics assume importance only in the case of drugs with a narrow therapeutic ratio (e.g. digoxin) and some of the antiarrhythmics such as lignocaine (lidocaine), procainamide and disopyramide. This necessitates reduction in both the loading and maintenance doses. Prolongation of the elimination half-life leads to delay in reaching steady-state, and therefore dose increments must be made more gradually. Plasma concentration measurements of the drugs concerned are a good guide to therapy and help to avoid toxicity. Pharmacokinetic changes are of less importance in the case of drugs with immediate clinical response, e.g. diuretics and intravenous vasodilators such as nitrates and phosphodiesterase inhibitors. The dose in the latter group can be titrated to the desired effect. Not all adverse reactions to drugs that may occur in heart failure are the result of alterations in pharmacokinetics; rather, some may be due to important drug interactions. An interaction may occur directly e.g. reduction of renal clearance of digoxin by captopril and quinidine; or indirectly, e.g. through diuretic-induced hypokalaemia, which exacerbate arrhythmias associated with digoxin and antiarrhythmics such as quinidine and procainamide.