The effects of regurgitant orifice size, chamber compliance, and systemic vascular resistance on aortic regurgitant velocity slope and pressure half-time

Clinical journey for patients with aortic regurgitation: A retrospective observational study from a multicenter database

BACKGROUND

Data using real-world assessments of aortic regurgitation (AR) severity to identify rates of Heart Valve Team evaluation and aortic valve replacement (AVR), as well as mortality among untreated patients, are lacking. The present study assessed these trends in care and outcomes for real-world patients with documented AR.

METHODS

Using a deidentified data set (January 2018-March 2023) representing 1,002,853 patients >18 years of age from 25 US institutions participating in the egnite Database (egnite, Inc.) with appropriate permissions, patients were classified by AR severity in echocardiographic reports. Rates of evaluation by the Heart Valve Team, AVR, and all-cause mortality without AVR were examined using Kaplan-Meier estimates and compared using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Within the data set, 845,113 patients had AR severity documented. For moderate-to-severe or severe AR, respectively, 2-year rates (95% confidence interval) of evaluation by the Heart Valve Team (43.5% [41.7%-45.3%] and 65.4% [63.3%-67.4%]) and AVR (19.4% [17.6%-21.1%] and 46.5% [44.2%-48.8%]) were low. Mortality at 2 years without AVR increased with greater AR severity, up to 20.7% for severe AR (p < 0.001). In exploratory analyses, 2-year mortality for untreated patients with left ventricular end-systolic dimension index > 25 mm/m2 was similar for moderate (34.3% [29.2%-39.1%]) and severe (37.2% [24.9%-47.5%]) AR.

CONCLUSIONS

Moderate or greater AR is associated with poor clinical outcomes among untreated patients at 2 years. Rates of Heart Valve Team evaluation and AVR were low for those with moderate or greater AR, suggesting that earlier referral to the Heart Valve Team could be beneficial.

Multi-modality imaging assessment of native valvular regurgitation: an EACVI and ESC council of valvular heart disease position paper

Valvular regurgitation represents an important cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Imaging is pivotal in the evaluation of native valve regurgitation and echocardiography is the primary imaging modality for this purpose. The imaging assessment of valvular regurgitation should integrate quantification of the regurgitation, assessment of the valve anatomy and function, and the consequences of valvular disease on cardiac chambers. In clinical practice, the management of patients with valvular regurgitation largely relies on the results of imaging. It is crucial to provide standards that aim at establishing a baseline list of measurements to be performed when assessing native valve regurgitation. The present document aims to present clinical guidance for the multi-modality imaging assessment of native valvular regurgitation.

Relation of Transthoracic Echocardiographic Aortic Regurgitation to Pressure Half-time and All-Cause Mortality

To evaluate the relation of aortic regurgitation (AR) pressure half-time (PHT) on transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and all-cause mortality, we screened 118,647 baseline TTE reports from 2000 to 2017, to identify patients with any AR and PHT data. Patients with infective endocarditis or previous aortic valve replacement were excluded. The relation of baseline PHT on time to all-cause mortality was evaluated using Cox regression. A total of 2,653 patients were included (73.1 ± 14.3 years; 53.8% female; PHT, 530 ± 162 ms). Patients with shorter PHTs more frequently had 3-4+ AR (PHT ≤ 200 ms vs > 500 ms, 17.9% vs 0.6%, p < 0.0001). Diastolic parameters (E/e', E/A ratio, mitral valve deceleration time, and pulmonary artery systolic pressure) all significantly correlated with PHT (all p < 0.05). Over a median (IQR) follow-up of 8 (4 to 11 years), there were 799 (30.1%) deaths at a median (IQR) of 1.9 (0.4 to 4.3) years. On a univariate basis, a PHT ≤ 320 ms or > 750 ms was significantly related to increased mortality, even amongst those with nonsevere AR. After multivariable adjustment (in particular for E/e'), PHT was no longer significantly related to death. In conclusion, in this large, single center, retrospective study, AR PHT was not independently related to mortality. While a PHT ≤ 320 ms was associated with increased mortality in patients without severe AR, this relation was no longer significant after adjusting for diastolic functional variables. Thus, a PHT ≤ 320 ms in patients without significant AR may indicate prognostically-relevant diastolic dysfunction.

Timing of Surgical Intervention for Aortic Regurgitation

OPINION STATEMENT

Aortic regurgitation is a frequently encountered condition, in which traditional measurements of severity have proven to be of limited value in identifying those who would be best served by aortic valve replacement. Novel methods of assessing severity are vital, particularly as an entirely new paradigm of aortic regurgitation has surfaced, with the advent of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), and the adverse events that are being observed with varying degrees of aortic regurgitation. With that in mind, a comprehensive assessment of aortic regurgitation should now include indexed left ventricular systolic volumes and a comprehensive assessment of right ventricular function, in addition to the quantitative measures that are currently recommended. Cardiac MRI also provides valuable information and should be strongly considered, particularly in challenging cases. The incremental value of additional echocardiographic parameters such as strain imaging, speckle tracking imaging, and tissue Doppler imaging remains unclear, and evidence for their utility is not, as yet, compelling. However, the field of aortic regurgitation assessment has been reinvigorated by the prevalence of paravalvular regurgitation post-TAVR, and many of the abovementioned parameters may need to be re-visited so that we can more accurately determine prognosis and risk stratify patients in a more reliable and evidence-based manner.

Multimodality imaging of heart valve disease

Unidentified heart valve disease is associated with a significant morbidity and mortality. It has therefore become important to accurately identify, assess and monitor patients with this condition in order that appropriate and timely intervention can occur. Although echocardiography has emerged as the predominant imaging modality for this purpose, recent advances in cardiac magnetic resonance and cardiac computed tomography indicate that they may have an important contribution to make. The current review describes the assessment of regurgitant and stenotic heart valves by multimodality imaging (echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance) and discusses their relative strengths and weaknesses.

Recommendations for the echocardiographic assessment of native valvular regurgitation: an executive summary from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging

Valvular regurgitation represents an important cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Echocardiography has become the primary non-invasive imaging method for the evaluation of valvular regurgitation. The echocardiographic assessment of valvular regurgitation should integrate the quantification of the regurgitation, assessment of the valve anatomy and function, as well as the consequences of valvular disease on cardiac chambers. In clinical practice, the management of patients with valvular regurgitation thus largely integrates the results of echocardiography. It is crucial to provide standards that aim at establishing a baseline list of measurements to be performed when assessing regurgitation.

Quantitative echocardiographic determinants of clinical outcome in asymptomatic patients with aortic regurgitation: a prospective study

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to define the link between aortic regurgitation (AR) quantitation and clinical outcome in asymptomatic patients with AR.

BACKGROUND

Quantitative American Society of Echocardiography (QASE) thresholds are recommended for AR assessment, but impact on clinical outcome is unknown.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled (1991 to 2003) 251 asymptomatic patients (age 60 +/- 17 years) with isolated AR and ejection fraction > or =50% with quantified AR and left ventricular (LV) volumes using Doppler-echocardiography.

RESULTS

Survival under medical management was independently determined by baseline regurgitant volume (RVol) (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.22 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08 to 1.35] per 10 ml/beat, p = 0.002) and effective regurgitant orifice (ERO) (adjusted HR 1.52 [95% CI 1.19 to 1.91] per 10 mm(2), p = 0.002), which superseded traditional AR grading. Patients with QASE-severe AR (RVol > or =60 ml/beat or ERO > or =30 mm(2)) versus QASE-mild AR (RVol <30 ml and ERO <10 mm(2)) had lower survival (10 years: 69 +/- 9% vs. 92 +/- 4%, p = 0.05) independently of all clinical characteristics (adjusted HR 4.1 [95% CI 1.4 to 14.1], p = 0.01) and lower survival free of surgery for AR (10 years: 20 +/- 5% vs. 92 +/- 4%, p < 0.001, adjusted HR 12.9 [95% CI 5.4 to 38.5]). Cardiac events were considerably more frequent with QASE-severe versus -moderate or -mild AR (10 years: 63 +/- 8% vs. 34 +/- 6% and 21 +/- 8%, p < 0.0001). Independent determinants of cardiac events were quantitative AR grading (QASE-severe adjusted HR 5.2 [95% CI 2.2 to 14.8], p < 0.001; QASE-moderate adjusted HR 2.4 [95% CI 1.06 to 6.6], p = 0.035), which superseded traditional AR assessment (p < 0.001) and LV end-systolic volume index (ESVI) (adjusted HR 1.09 [95% CI 1.03 to 1.14 per 10 ml/m(2)], p = 0.002), which superseded LV M-mode diameters. In QASE-severe AR, patients with ESVI > or =45 versus <45 ml/m(2) had higher cardiac event rates (10 years: 87 +/- 8% vs. 40 +/- 10%, p < 0.001). Cardiac surgery for AR reduced cardiac events in patients with QASE-severe AR (adjusted HR 0.23 [95% CI 0.09 to 0.57], p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Echocardiographic quantitation of AR severity and ESVI provides independent and superior predictors of clinical outcome in asymptomatic patients with AR and ejection fraction > or =50% and should be widely clinically applied. Patients with QASE-severe AR and ESVI > or =45 ml/m(2) should be carefully considered for cardiac surgery, which reduces cardiac events risk.

Quantitative assessment of pulmonary insufficiency by Doppler echocardiography in patients with adult congenital heart disease

We determined the utility of continuous wave (CW) Doppler for quantification of pulmonary insufficiency (PI) confirmed by pulmonary angiography in patients with postoperative adult congenital heart disease. A total of 41 patients with PI were divided into two groups on the basis of PI severity by pulmonary angiography: group A (n = 27) with severe PI and group B (n = 14) with mild or moderate PI. Nine patients in group A had pulmonic valve replacement and reverted to mild PI after surgery. Their pre- and postoperative data were compared. All underwent a two-dimensional/Doppler study with interrogation of the PI jet for jet width by color Doppler and peak flow velocity, deceleration time (DT), pressure half-time (PHT), diastolic period (DP), and PI flow time (FT) by CW Doppler. The no-flow time (NFT), NFT/FT ratio, and NFT/DP fraction were calculated. Group A had a larger right ventricle (4.1 +/- 0.9 vs. 3.5 +/- 0.6 cm, P = .033), higher PI peak velocity (2.1 +/- 0.5 vs. 1.7 +/- 0.5 m/s, P = .04), shorter DT (261 +/- 61 vs. 317 +/- 83 ms, P = .018) and PHT (76 +/- 29 vs. 132 +/- 53, P < .0001), longer NFT (146 +/- 66 vs. 40 +/- 42 ms, P < .0001), and higher ratios of NFT/FT (46% +/- 27% vs. 13% +/- 14%, P < .0001) and NFT/DP (29% +/- 13% vs. 10% +/- 9%, P < .0001). The PHT and DT lengthened, and the NFT shortened in patients who underwent pulmonic valve replacement (all P < .05). By binary logistic regression, NFT and PHT were the best predictors for severe PI. An NFT of 80 ms had 84% sensitivity and 93% specificity, and a PHT of 100 ms had 93% sensitivity and 93% specificity for identifying angiographically severe PI. CW Doppler accurately distinguishes severe from lesser degrees of PI in patients with postoperative adult congenital heart disease.

A practical approach to the quantification of valvular regurgitation

This article reviews the methods of determining the severity of mitral and aortic regurgitation, primarily the quantitation using Doppler echocardiography. The Doppler methods, including spatial mapping, proximal flow convergence, vena contracta, continuous-wave Doppler density, and upstream or downstream effects are explained. Various practical pitfalls and performance issues that impact the reliability of these techniques are discussed.

Proximal pulmonary artery blood flow characteristics in healthy subjects measured in an upright posture using MRI: The effects of exercise and age

PURPOSE

To use MRI to quantify blood flow conditions in the proximal pulmonary arteries of healthy children and adults at rest and during exercise in an upright posture.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cine phase-contrast MRI was used to calculate mean flow and reverse flow index (RFI) in the main (MPA), right (RPA), and left (LPA) pulmonary arteries in healthy children and adults in an open-MRI magnet equipped with an upright MRI-compatible ergometer.

RESULTS

From rest to exercise (150% resting heart rate), blood flow (liters/minute/m2) increased in the RPA (1.4+/-0.3 vs. 2.5+/-0.4; P<0.001), LPA (1.1+/-0.3 vs. 2.2+/-0.6; P<0.001), and MPA (2.7+/-0.5 vs. 4.9+/-0.5; P<0.001). RFI decreased in the LPA (0.040+/-0.030 vs. 0.017+/-0.018; P<0.02) and MPA (0.025+/-0.024 vs. 0.008+/-0.007; P<0.03). Adults experienced greater retrograde flow in the MPA than the children (0.042+/-0.029 vs. 0.014+/-0.012; P<0.02).

CONCLUSION

It appears that at both rest and during exercise, in children and adults alike, RPA/LPA mean blood flow distribution is predominantly determined by distal vascular resistance, while retrograde flow is affected by proximal pulmonary bifurcation geometry.

What does transesophageal echocardiography add to valvular heart surgery?

No single monitoring tool in the last decade has had more of an effect on intraoperative decision making and surgical management of cardiac valvular pathologies than has TEE. It has become the standard of care for evaluating reparative valvular procedures, thus providing an immediate gauge of the surgical results and helping to avoid suboptimal surgical outcomes. As the technology of TEE and its application advance, so too should the ability to diagnose and manage valvular pathologies, broaden the range of surgical options, and ultimately improve patient outcomes.

A new echocardiographic method for the assessment of the severity of aortic regurgitation: color M-mode flow propagation velocity

PURPOSE

Echocardiographic Doppler methods widely used in assessment of the severity of aortic regurgitation (AR) are considered sensitive and reliable. However, they all have limitations for quantitation of AR. The color M-mode Doppler flow propagation velocity (FPV) method has been shown to provide useful insights in the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function and appears to be minimally affected with preload changes. Clinical data regarding the value of FPV in the determination of the significance of valvular insuffiencies are lacking. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of FPV in measurement of the severity of AR and to compare its reliability with angiography and other echocardiographic methods.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients (13 male, 16 female) who had cardiac catheterization for various reasons before echocardiographic evaluation were included. The mean age was 53.6 +/- 13.4 years. At the time of cardiac catheterization, the degree of AR was assessed as mild in 10 patients, as moderate in 12, and as severe in 7. In all patients, FPV measurements of AR were obtained with color M-mode Doppler in the apical 5-chamber view. Regurgitation jet height and its ratio to left ventricular outflow obtained in the parasternal long axis with color flow Doppler, pressure half-time, and slope of AR obtained with continuous wave Doppler in apical 5-chamber view were other echocardiographic methods chosen for comparison.

RESULTS

The mean values of FPV were 93.1 +/- 18.4 cm/s, 49.8 +/- 8.0 cm/s, and 31.7 +/- 4.9 cm/s in severe, moderate, and mild AR groups, respectively (P <.001). Significant correlation was observed between angiographic grades, FPV, pressure half-time, slope, and jet height and ratio to left ventricular outflow (P <.0001, r = 0.93; P <.0001, r = -0.81; P <.0001, r = 0.76; P <.0001, r = 0.92, respectively).

CONCLUSION

FPV is a simple, practical, and reliable method for the quantification of AR.

Measurement of aortic valve anatomic regurgitant area using transesophageal echocardiography: implications for the quantitation of aortic regurgitation

BACKGROUND

Various echocardiographic methods for the assessment of the severity of the aortic regurgitation (AR) by have been described with no general consensus.

AIM

To assess the feasibility and reproducibility of direct planimetric measurement of the end-diastolic gap between aortic cusps on the transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) images in patients with AR. We also analyzed the correlation of this anatomic aortic regurgitanty area with angiographic AR severity.

METHODS

Ninety patients (38 males, 52 females, mean age 41 +/- 24 years) with AR who underwent TEE and contrast aortography in a single institution. The AR was graded angiographically as mild (n = 45), moderate (n = 31), and severe (n = 14). The anatomic regurgitant area was measured on the end-diastolic short-axis TEE images of the aortic valve by planimetering the central gap bordered by the commisural edges of the aortic cusps.

RESULTS

The intraobserver and interobserver variability for the measurement of aortic anatomic regurgitant area were small (mean absolute differences 0.01 +/- 0.01 cm(2), and 0.015 +/- 0.013 cm(2), respectively). The average values of anatomic regurgitant area for angiographically mild, moderate, and severe AR were 0.15 +/- 0.05 cm(2), 0.30 +/- 0.08 cm(2), and 0.68 +/- 0.33 cm(2), respectively (P <.001). When the anatomic regurgitant area was graded as small (> 0.2 cm(2)), moderate (> 0.2 and > 0.4 cm(2)) and large (> 0.4 cm(2)), the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and the diagnostic accuracy for predicting the angiographically mild AR were 85%, 97%, 97%, 87%, and 91%, respectively. For the moderate angiographic AR the same values were 84%, 92%, 81%, 93%, and 90%, and for the severe angiographic AR they were 98%, 93%, 93%, 98% and 97%.

CONCLUSION

The planimetric measurement of aortic anatomic regurgitant area by TEE is feasible and reproducible for the assessment of the severity of AR.

Aortic Insufficiency

Echocardiography is a reliable and reproducible method for evaluation of aortic insufficiency (AI). AI has a variety of etiologies, including congenital or acquired, and may present as an acute situation or as a chronic condition. Regardless of the clinical presentation, patient symptoms and physical signs may not be present unless the AI has progressed to a moderate or severe degree. As the severity of AI increases, there are changes in the pathophysiology of the heart, including an increase in left ventricle dimensions and chamber compliance. Echocardiographic methods to evaluate AI include two-dimensional, m-mode, color flow imaging, and pulsed wave and continuous wave Doppler. The combined use of multiple techniques provides more thorough and accurate quantification, both during follow-up of the disease process and after surgical correction.

Influence of left ventricular relaxation on the pressure half time of aortic regurgitation

BACKGROUND

The severity of aortic regurgitation can be estimated using pressure half time (PHT) of the aortic regurgitation flow velocity, but the correlation between regurgitant fraction and PHT is weak.

AIM

To test the hypothesis that the association between PHT and regurgitant fraction is substantially influenced by left ventricular relaxation.

METHODS

In 63 patients with aortic regurgitation, subdivided into a group without (n = 22) and a group with (n = 41) left ventricular hypertrophy, regurgitant fraction was calculated using the difference between right and left ventricular cardiac outputs. Left ventricular relaxation was assessed using the early to late diastolic Doppler tissue velocity ratio of the mitral annulus (E/ADTI), the E/A ratio of mitral inflow (E/AM), and the E deceleration time (E-DT). Left ventricular hypertrophy was assessed using the M mode derived left ventricular mass index.

RESULTS

The overall correlation between regurgitant fraction and PHT was weak (r = 0.36, p < 0.005). In patients without left ventricular hypertrophy, there was a significant correlation between regurgitant fraction and PHT (r = 0.62, p < 0.005), but not in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy. In patients with a left ventricular relaxation abnormality (defined as E/ADTI< 1, E/AM< age corrected lower limit, E-DT >/= 220 ms), no associations between regurgitant fraction and PHT were found, whereas in patients without left ventricular relaxation abnormalities, the regurgitant fraction to PHT relations were significant (normal E/AM: r = 0.57, p = 0.02; E-DT< 220 ms: r = 0.50, p < 0.001; E/ADTI < 1: r = 0.57, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Only normal left ventricular relaxation allows a significant decay of PHT with increasing aortic regurgitation severity. In abnormal relaxation, which is usually present in left ventricular hypertrophy, wide variation in prolonged backward left ventricular filling may cause dissociation between the regurgitant fraction and PHT. Thus the PHT method should only be used in the absence of left ventricular relaxation abnormalities.

Influence of Heart Rate on Doppler Aortic Regurgitant Velocity Curve: Clinical Role of Heart Rate Correction of Regurgitant Pressure Half-Time

Because it was recently suggested that pressure half-time (PHT) of aortic regurgitant velocity curve is influenced by heart rate (HR), we retrospectively analyzed 76 patients with aortic regurgitation (AR) to determine whether PHT independently correlates with HR and whether HR correction of PHT can be clinically useful. PHT correlated significantly (P < 0.001) with color Doppler relative regurgitant jet height (r = -0.62), with angiographic grading (r = -0.65), and with HR (r = -0.54); such correlations were confirmed by multivariate analysis. Tachycardia influences aortic velocity curve more than bradycardia, and this effect is more evident in patients with milder regurgitation. Two methods of HR correction of PHT were tested: relative PHT (PHT/diastolic time x 100) and corrected PHT (PHT/ radicalRR): only corrected PHT was independently related to both relative regurgitant jet height and angiographic grading (P < 0.001). HR correction of PHT by corrected PHT was of limited clinical usefulness: in fact, in the entire study population, the accuracy of the usual cutoff (< 300 msec) in detecting relevant AR was not improved by corrected PHT. However, in patients with higher HR (>/= 85 beats/min), in whom the effect of HR on aortic velocity curve appeared to be greater, corrected PHT was superior to PHT because the cutoff value of < 300 msec showed a good specificity (100%), a moderate sensitivity (66%), and a good accuracy (80%) in detecting relevant AR. Corrected PHT can be useful to confirm AR severity when a short PHT is observed in tachycardic patients.

An integrated approach to the quantification of aortic regurgitation by Doppler echocardiography

BACKGROUND

Although different Doppler methods have been proposed for the quantification of aortic regurgitation, no study has prospectively compared these methods with each other and their correlation with angiography. The aim of this study was to prospectively analyze the usefulness of different Doppler echocardiography parameters by testing all such parameters in each patient.

METHODS

Fifty-one patients with aortic regurgitation underwent 2-dimensional and Doppler echocardiographic studies and catheterization. The following Doppler indexes were analyzed and compared with aortography. Color Doppler: (1) jet color height/left ventricular outflow tract height in parasternal long-axis view, and (2) jet color area/left ventricular outflow tract area in short-axis view. Continuous Doppler: (3) regurgitant flow pressure half-time, (4) regurgitant flow time velocity integral (in centimeters), and (5) regurgitant flow time velocity integral (in centimeters)/diastolic period (in milliseconds). Pulsed Doppler in thoracic and abdominal aorta: (6) time velocity integral of diastolic reverse flow (in centimeters), (7) time velocity integral of systolic anterograde flow/integral of diastolic reverse flow, (8) (time velocity integral of diastolic reverse flow/diastolic period) x 100, and (9) diastolic reverse flow duration/diastolic period (as a percentage). We compared these parameters with severity of regurgitation measured by angiography and classified as mild, moderate, or severe.

RESULTS

The most useful parameters were (1) jet color height/left ventricular outflow tract height (correctly classified 42 of 49 patients), (2) (time velocity integral of diastolic reverse flow/diastolic period) x 100 in the thoracic aorta (correctly classified 41 of 46 patients), and (3) (time velocity integral of diastolic reverse flow/diastolic period) x 100 in the abdominal aorta (correctly classified 42 of 49 patients). Sequential integration of these 3 parameters correctly classified 96% of patients (44 of 46 patients) and was achieved in 90% of cases.

CONCLUSION

An integrated combination of several Doppler parameters can quickly and accurately classify the degree of aortic regurgitation as determined by angiography.

Doppler evaluation of aortic regurgitation in children

Doppler indexes have been used successfully to determine the severity of aortic regurgitation (AR) in adults but have not been evaluated systematically in children. To evaluate the accuracy of specific Doppler echocardiographic indexes in assessing the degree of AR in children, 30 children underwent 2-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography within 24 hours of angiography. Patients were divided into 4 groups based on the degree of angiographic AR. Color Doppler jet width, short-axis jet area, jet length, and maximum jet area were measured. AR slope was measured using continuous-wave Doppler. Flow in the abdominal aorta was evaluated using pulsed Doppler. Doppler indexes were compared with the angiographic grade of AR. Jet width and short-axis jet area were significantly different between groups and showed strong correlation with the angiographic grade. Holodiastolic flow reversal in the abdominal aorta separated 1+ to 2+ from 3+ to 4+ AR (100% sensitivity and 100% negative predictive value for 3+ to 4+ AR). Jet length, maximum jet area, and the ratio of reverse to forward abdominal aortic velocity time integrals correlated with angiography but showed little difference between groups that differed by only 1 angiographic grade. AR slope did not correlate with the angiographic grade. We conclude that in children, color Doppler jet width, short-axis jet area, and holodiastolic abdominal aortic flow reversal are the best predictors of angiographic severity. Use of these indexes may obviate the need for angiography to determine the degree of AR in children.