Antiarrhythmic efficacy of encainide and quinidine: validation of a model for drug assessment

Therapeutic drug monitoring of antiarrhythmic drugs

Most antiarrhythmic drugs fulfil the formal requirements for rational use of therapeutic drug monitoring, as they show highly variable plasma concentration profiles at a given dose and a direct concentration-effect relationship. Therapeutic ranges for antiarrhythmic drugs are, however, often very poorly defined. Effective drug concentrations are based on small studies or studies not designed to establish a therapeutic range, with varying dosage regimens and unstandardised sampling procedures. There are large numbers of nonresponders and considerable overlap between therapeutic and toxic concentrations. Furthermore, no study has ever shown that therapeutic drug monitoring makes a significant difference in clinical outcome. Therapeutic concentration ranges for antiarrhythmic drugs as they exist today can give an overall impression about the drug concentrations required in the majority of patients. They may also be helpful for dosage adjustment in patients with renal or hepatic failure or in patients with possible toxicological or compliance problems. Their use in optimising individual antiarrhythmic therapy, however, is very limited.

Encainide dosing in patients with severe renal dysfunction: report of a case and literature review

Dosage of encainide for patients with lethal ventricular arrhythmias is based on pharmacodynamic effects and efficacy of arrhythmia suppression, coupled with metabolizer phenotype and extent of renal and hepatic dysfunction. Decreased clearance in patients with renal dysfunction necessitates a reduction in dosage to avoid toxic and dose-related proarrhythmic effects. This case represents a patient with severe renal dysfunction and sustained ventricular tachycardia who achieved electrophysiologically guided suppression of induced ventricular tachycardia at a steady-state encainide dose of only 25 mg daily, significantly lower than package insert or compendial recommendations for initial dosage in patients with renal insufficiency. Documented "therapeutic" metabolite concentrations correlated to electrophysiologic response. Literature review illustrates the complexity of encainide dosage in such individuals and underscores the need for therapeutic drug monitoring to individualize dosage.

A comparison of antiarrhythmic drugs for the suppression of ventricular ectopic depolarizations: a meta-analysis

This article reports the results of a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of antiarrhythmic drugs for the suppression of ventricular ectopic depolarizations. We analyzed 97 published articles that referred to a total of 27 drugs and contained data from 2989 patient-treatment trials; our goal was to determine the number of patients responding to therapy, defined as greater than or equal to 80% suppression of ventricular ectopic depolarizations. By means of logistic regression we tested the effect of 10 clinical and experimental variables on the likelihood of response to therapy. The likelihood of a drug response was significantly affected by the following six variables: increased by the use of dose titration (t = 3.59, p less than 0.0001), increased by the use of a higher daily dose (t = 3.21, p less than 0.0001), decreased by older age (t-2.67, p = 0.004), decreased by the use of blinding (t = -2.28, p = 0.011), increased by treating more male patients (t = 1.72, p = 0.043), and decreased by the presence of cardiovascular disease (t = -1.52, p = 0.064). Incorporating these six variables into our logistic regression model, we adjusted the response rate in each published study and calculated the mean response and standard error for each drug. Of the drugs tested in at least 100 patients, the most effective were amiodarone (estimated response rate 90%), encainide (80%), flecainide (79%), and propafenone (74%). Class IC drugs were significantly more effective than class IB and II drugs (p less than 0.05). With the exception of lorcainide and moricizine, class IC drugs were also more effective than class IA drugs (p less than 0.05). Amiodarone was significantly more effective than all drugs except encainide and flecainide (p less than 0.05). We found no significant differences among the response rates to class IA, IB, and II drugs. Whereas several patient and study characteristics affect the likelihood of response to antiarrhythmic drugs, class IC drugs and amiodarone are significantly more effective than other drugs in suppressing ventricular ectopic depolarizations.

Effect of aluminum hydroxide gel on quinidine gluconate absorption

The effect of aluminum hydroxide gel on quinidine gluconate bioavailability was studied in eight nonsmoking healthy male volunteers. Subjects were randomized to receive quinidine gluconate 648 mg with and without 30 mL of aluminum hydroxide gel. The mean area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) (23.11 +/- 5.21 mg.h/L), time to reach maximum concentration (tmax) (3.13 +/- 0.64 h), maximum serum concentration (1.44 +/- 0.41 mg/L), and elimination rate constant (0.069 +/- 0.010-h) observed during the control phase of the trial did not differ significantly (p greater than 0.05) from values obtained during the coadministration of aluminum hydroxide with quinidine gluconate (23.91 +/- 4.48 mg.h/L, 4.13 +/- 2.12 h, 1.53 +/- 0.34 mg/L, and 0.077 +/- 0.013-h, respectively). There was considerable individual variation in AUC with one subject demonstrating an increase of 35 percent and one subject demonstrating a decrease of 18 percent. There was a trend toward aluminum hydroxide delaying tmax with only one subject experiencing an earlier tmax with the coadministration of aluminum hydroxide. The results of this single-dose trial suggest that, although statistically the concurrent administration of aluminum hydroxide gel with quinidine gluconate does not significantly alter the extent of quinidine absorption, clinically significant individual variations may occasionally occur.

Comparative hemodynamic effects of procainamide, tocainide, and encainide in severe chronic heart failure

Many of the newer antiarrhythmic agents are said to cause minimal myocardial depression, but their hemodynamic effects have not been invasively evaluated and compared in patients with severe chronic heart failure. In a randomized, crossover study, the hemodynamic responses to single oral doses of procainamide (750 mg), tocainide (600 mg), and encainide (50 mg) given to 21 patients with severe chronic heart failure were compared. Cardiac performance decreased with all three drugs, but the magnitude of deterioration differed among the three agents. Stroke volume index decreased with procainamide (-5 +/- 1 ml/m2, p less than 0.001), tocainide (-7 +/- 1 ml/m2, p less than 0.001), and encainide (-8 +/- 1 ml/m2, p less than 0.001), but the decline was significantly greater with encainide than with procainamide (p less than 0.05). Similarly, left ventricular filling pressure increased with tocainide and encainide (+4 +/- 1 and +5 +/- 2 mm Hg, respectively; both p less than 0.05), but not with procainamide; the increase was significantly greater with tocainide and encainide than with procainamide (p less than 0.001). These deleterious hemodynamic effects were accompanied by worsening symptoms of heart failure in six patients with encainide and seven patients with tocainide but in only two patients with procainamide. Serum levels for all drugs were in the therapeutic range. In conclusion, although the three type I antiarrhythmic agents tested may all adversely affect left ventricular function in patients with heart failure, encainide and tocainide are more likely than procainamide to cause hemodynamic and clinical deterioration.

Encainide

Encainide is a class IC antiarrhythmic agent having little or no effect on action-potential duration or maximum diastolic potential but decreasing the maximum rate of phase O depolarization as well as increasing atrial and ventricular effective refractory periods. In intact animals or humans, encainide increases the AH, PR, QRS, and H-V intervals while not affecting the sinus node cycle length or JT interval. QT interval increases only by the concomitant increase in the QRS interval. Encainide is metabolized to O-demethyl encainide (ODE) and 3-methoxy-ODE (MODE), both of which are also antiarrhythmics with similar pharmacology to encainide. Encainide and its metabolites have little negative inotropic activity and ancillary pharmacology. Consequently, encainide has little or no effect on hemodynamic variables in patients with either normal or compromised cardiac function. The drug is well tolerated, with side effects being mainly those associated with its local anesthetic activity such as blurred vision and dizziness. Encainide is particularly effective in patients with excessive premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) and less so in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT). Like all antiarrhythmics, encainide may aggravate or precipitate new arrhythmias (proarrhythmia). The overall incidence of proarrhythmia is about 10%, with less occurring in patients with PVCs and more in those with sustained VT; also, the incidence of proarrhythmia is higher in patients with underlying heart disease. Encainide is also effective for the treatment of supra-ventricular arrhythmias, including atrial fibrillation, PSVT (both PAF as well as reentry of the nodal or W-P-W type), and ectopic atrial tachycardia. Its dosage and role in antiarrhythmic therapy are discussed.

Long-term oral propafenone therapy for suppression of refractory symptomatic atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter

Sixty patients who had recurrent episodes of symptomatic atrial fibrillation or flutter, or both, and who had failed one to five prior drug trials were treated with open label oral propafenone hydrochloride. On a mean maximal tolerated dose of 795 +/- 180 mg/day, actuarial estimates of the percent of individuals free of recurrences of symptomatic atrial fibrillation/flutter during propafenone treatment were: 1 month, 54%; 3 months, 44% and 6 months, 40%. No individual baseline characteristic achieved statistical significance as a correlate of poor response to propafenone. Drug-related adverse reactions were reported in 22% of patients but were severe enough to require termination of propafenone in only 5%. Thus, oral propafenone is a useful and well tolerated drug for long-term suppression of symptomatic recurrences of atrial fibrillation/flutter despite a history of unresponsiveness to prior antiarrhythmic drug treatment.

New antiarrhythmic drugs

While controversy still exists as to the precise indications for the treatment of all forms of ventricular arrhythmia, advances in the number and, more importantly, type of antiarrhythmic drugs can provide the clinician with a rational basis for selecting antiarrhythmic drug therapy. A host of new agents with different pharmacokinetic and electrophysiological actions are now available, and can be compared or contrasted to conventional antiarrhythmic agents such as quinidine, procainamide, disopyramide, lignocaine (lidocaine) and bretylium. This review summarises the electrophysiological, haemodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and efficacy and safety data of mexiletine, tocainide, flecainide, encainide, propafenone, amiodarone, sotalol, pirmenol, cibenzoline (cifenline) and ethmozine (moracizine, moricizine), and aims to provide a basis on which clinicians can compare and contrast these agents and form an algorithm for selection of antiarrhythmic drug therapy in the treatment of patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Encainide-induced hyperglycemia

Twenty-three patients were treated for at least one month with encainide, a new antiarrhythmic drug. No patient was treated for hyperglycemia prior to encainide therapy. During encainide administration, five episodes of marked hyperglycemia (serum glucose level greater than or equal to 200 mg/dl) developed in four patients. (One patient received encainide twice.) The mean pretreatment glucose level was 190 +/- 69 mg/dl and rose to 397 +/- 163 mg/dl after one month of encainide therapy in patients in whom hyperglycemia developed (p less than 0.025). The glucose level was 111 +/- 27 mg/dl in nonhyperglycemic patients before encainide administration and 108 +/- 22 mg/dl after one month of encainide therapy (p = NS). There was no difference in age or encainide dosage between hyperglycemic and nonhyperglycemic patients. Treatment for hyperglycemia was given during four of the five encainide treatment periods in hyperglycemic patients. Encainide was discontinued in each of the five hyperglycemic episodes; therapeutic requirements for hyperglycemia markedly decreased. Hypoglycemic reactions to insulin occurred in two patients when encainide was stopped. Thus, encainide exacerbates hyperglycemia in some patients. These patients usually have mild hyperglycemia not requiring therapy before administration of encainide but may require insulin while receiving encainide. Treatment requirements for hyperglycemia decrease following withdrawal of encainide. The mechanism of this effect and the consequences of long-term encainide therapy on glucose metabolism are unknown.

Encainide: its electrophysiologic and antiarrhythmic effects, pharmacokinetics, and safety

Encainide is a class IC antiarrhythmic agent that has been under clinical investigation for the last decade. Laboratory and clinical studies have demonstrated it to be a potent suppressor of ventricular extrasystoles. It is effective in approximately one-half of patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmias. The preliminary experience in patients with supraventricular arrhythmias indicates that the drug is particularly effective in arrhythmias associated with an accessory pathway. Side effects most commonly include blurred vision, nausea, heart block, and proarrhythmic effects. The hemodynamic effect of oral encainide are insignificant in patients with well-preserved left ventricular function. Despite minimal myocardial depression in patients with left ventricular dysfunction, there is the potential for worsening of heart failure. Encainide has a short half-life of 3 hours, but has 2 active metabolites with longer half-lives. No clinically significant drug interaction has been demonstrated with encainide therapy.

Combination of theophylline and salbutamol for arrhythmias in severe COPD

We conducted a single-bind placebo controlled study using 24-hour continuous ambulatory electrocardiographic recordings. The arrhythmogenic potential of the combination of salbutamol and theophylline was investigated in 25 ambulatory subjects with severe chronic airflow obstruction (mean age 65 +/- 8 SD, mean FEV1 31 percent +/- 13 SD predicted). Asymptomatic arrhythmias were very prevalent in the study population: 76 percent of the patients had runs of supraventricular tachycardia while 24 percent had runs of ventricular tachycardia. Individual arrhythmia frequency showed greater between-test variability than previously described in non-COPD subjects. The mode of administration of salbutamol may have affected arrhythmia frequency in that subjects using aerosol nebulizers had more ventricular extrasystoles than those using metered dose inhalers. Although the addition of theophylline to salbutamol significantly increased heart rate and supraventricular extrasystoles, there was no statistically significant increase in ventricular arrhythmias.

Safety of encainide for the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias

A data base of 1,245 patients treated for ventricular arrhythmias, most of whom had serious cardiac disease, was reviewed. Only 2.9% of these patients had benign ventricular arrhythmias without structural heart disease. The overall incidence of proarrhythmia in this population was 9.2% (115/1,245), but was as frequent as 16% in patients with a history of cardiomyopathy. The proarrhythmic form was new sustained ventricular tachycardia in 22 patients (1.8%). Only 2 of 71 patients (2.8%) with primary arrhythmia had a proarrhythmic event. The incidence has decreased markedly over the past years as reduced doses and gradual titration have been used. There were 137 deaths in the data base of which 82 were sudden, all in patients with advanced (79) or moderately severe (3) cardiac disease. High initial doses, prior myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure (CHF) were positively associated with sudden cardiac death. There were no deaths among the 71 patients with benign arrhythmias. Death rates were related to the severity of the arrhythmia being treated. Comparisons with published survival curves indicated modest improvement; in no case was survival decreased. Invasive and noninvasive measures of left ventricular function indicated no adverse hemodynamic effects. There was only 1 case of new and 3 cases of worsened CHF probably related to encainide. Only 5 patients discontinued for CHF or related signs and symptoms. The most frequent drug-related noncardiac adverse reactions were dizziness (26%), abnormal or blurred vision (19%), QRS interval prolongation (5%), taste perversion (4%) and tremor (3%). In conclusion, the use of reduced doses and gradual titration of encainide has markedly decreased the incidence of proarrhythmia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Acute intravenous and long-term oral hemodynamic effects of encainide

The short- and long-term hemodynamic effects of encainide, a new class IC antiarrhythmic agent, were studied in 25 patients (mean age 61 +/- 11) with complex symptomatic ventricular arrhythmia and left ventricular dysfunction. Ninety-two percent had previous myocardial infarction and 8% had dilated cardiomyopathy. Seventy-five percent had congestive heart failure, class III or IV, according to the New York Heart Association. All patients underwent a nuclear ventriculogram performed at least 3 days after discontinuing previous antiarrhythmic drugs. Nuclear ventriculograms were repeated 1 to 6 weeks later while the patients were receiving therapeutic doses of encainide ranging from 75 to 300 [corrected] mg/day. Nuclear ventriculograms were also repeated after 6 months or 1 year of encainide therapy in 16 of these patients. Encainide did not have significant effects on heart rate, blood pressure, left ventricular ejection fraction, systolic or end-diastolic volumes. None of the patients showed a worsening of congestive heart failure during encainide therapy. These results compare favorably with those of other class I antiarrhythmic agents. A review of published reports on the hemodynamic effects of intravenous encainide shows it to have a mild but statistically significant dose-related depressant effect on cardiac function. This effect, however, appears to be no different from that of other newer class I agents.

Encainide for ventricular arrhythmias: placebo-controlled and standard comparison trials

Efficacy data obtained from the use of encainide in the treatment of patients with benign or potentially lethal ventricular arrhythmias are reviewed. These include an oral dose multicenter titration study involving 111 patients in whom encainide was given from 25 to 75 mg, 4 times/day, which was followed by a 3-center, reduced dose study in which 35 patients received a forced escalation of encainide from 10 to 30 mg, 4 times/day. Frequent Holter monitoring was used to judge efficacy. An 8-center, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled outpatient trial was conducted using encainide from 10 to 50 mg, 3 times/day, in 125 patients. This trial defined the lower end of the dose response curve for encainide to be 25 mg, 3 times/day. The data from all these trials show that when properly titrated, encainide is effective in decreasing ventricular premature complex frequency by at least 75% in about 80% of patients. A similar percentage will have abolition of ventricular tachycardia. When encainide was compared with quinidine in a 9-center placebo-controlled crossover study, encainide demonstrated more efficacy at 25 mg, 4 times/day, compared with quinidine at 200 mg, 4 times/day, in all arrhythmia parameters. Encainide was also better tolerated than quinidine and there was no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of asymptomatic proarrhythmia as detected by Holter monitoring between these 2 drugs. Long-term data in 220 patients over 36-month follow-up show continued encainide efficacy. Thus, encainide is a potent, effective class 1C antiarrhythmic agent and it has minimal negative inotropic effects and is well tolerated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effects of encainide and its metabolites on energy requirements for defibrillation

Encainide, a class IC antiarrhythmic agent, has been associated with proarrhythmic responses of ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation requiring defibrillation in patients. We examined the short-term effects of intravenous encainide and its two major metabolites, O-demethyl-encainide (ODE) and 3-methoxy-ODE (MODE), on the energy requirements for successful defibrillation in 25 pentobarbital-anesthetized, open-chest dogs. Truncated exponential (60% tilt) defibrillation shocks were administered through right atrial spring and left ventricular epicardial patch electrodes identical to those used in man with the automatic implantable defibrillator. At baseline multiple shocks of varying energy were applied to construct curves of percent successful defibrillation as a function of energy (DF curves) for each animal. Encainide, ODE, or MODE was then infused in loading and maintenance doses to achieve QRS widening of 20% to 50%. Saline was administered to animals serving as controls. Determination of the DF curve was repeated, after which the infusion was discontinued. After 1 hr washout period, an additional DF curve was constructed. The data were analyzed by logistic regression, and the energies required for 50% successful defibrillation (E50) were compared. No significant differences existed between the four groups in body or heart weight, extent of QRS widening, or baseline E50 values. After administration of encainide and ODE, the E50 increased by 129 +/- 43% (p less than .001) and 76 +/- 34% (p less than .005), respectively. Return of E50 toward baseline was observed after the washout periods in both groups (p less than .025), demonstrating the reversibility of the drugs' effects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Autoregressive errors with a repeated measures design in clinical trials

Repeated measures designs are common in clinical trials where recordings on a patient are made repeatedly over time. A basic assumption for the analysis of repeated measures designs is that a common correlation structure between observations for a given patient exists. When several observations are made for each patient this assumption may be tenuous at best. This article presents a pragmatic approach for combining a repeated measures design with a first-order autoregressive error component. A method of filtering the observed data to account for the autoregressive structure of the errors is considered. The effect on the analysis of variance results after extraction of the autoregressive component is seen by comparison of ANOVA summaries.

Encainide: a new antiarrhythmic agent

Encainide is classified as a type Ic antiarrhythmic agent. Absorption is essentially complete, but bioavailability is variable because of first-pass metabolism. Two metabolic phenotypes, extensive and poor metabolizers, have been identified. O-demethyl encainide and 3-methoxy-O-demethyl encainide are active metabolites of encainide and contribute significantly to its antiarrhythmic effect. In clinical trials, encainide has been shown to be highly effective in suppressing premature ventricular contractions and ventricular tachyarrhythmias. The drug is useful in treating ventricular arrhythmias refractory to other agents. Encainide is also moderately effective in supraventricular arrhythmias involving an accessory pathway. It is highly effective in cases of Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, where the accessory pathway has a short refractory period. Common adverse effects of encainide are dizziness, visual disturbances, nausea, and headache. Encainide appears to be a safe and effective antiarrhythmic agent with few adverse effects and negligible hemodynamic effects. Encainide may be a useful agent for ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias, particularly those refractory to other agents.

Comparative study of encainide and quinidine in the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias

The antiarrhythmic efficacy and safety of oral encainide hydrochloride and quinidine sulfate were compared in a nine center double-blind crossover study in 187 outpatients with benign or potentially lethal ventricular arrhythmias. Patients with at least 30 premature ventricular complexes/h were randomized to receive either encainide, 25 mg four times/day, or quinidine, 200 mg four times/day, for 2 weeks. These doses were continued for another 2 weeks if a 75% or greater reduction in premature ventricular complexes was observed. If this reduction was not seen, encainide was increased to 50 mg four times/day or quinidine to 400 mg four times/day for an additional 2 weeks. Both drugs produced a statistically significant reduction in premature ventricular complex frequency compared with baseline values. Encainide produced a statistically significant greater mean reduction in total premature ventricular complexes than did quinidine during the initial dose phase and after dose adjustment. More patients required dose increases of quinidine (60%) than of encainide (51%). Early discontinuation of treatment resulting in advancement to the next study period occurred in 12 patients taking encainide and 38 patients taking quinidine (p less than 0.05). PR and QRS intervals increased significantly during encainide treatment, as did QTc and JT intervals during quinidine treatment. No adverse reactions resulted from these electrocardiographic changes. Adverse reactions were more common with quinidine than with encainide.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Spectrum of antiarrhythmic response to encainide

Encainide is effective in suppressing non-life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias; however, inconsistent results have been noted in patients with more serious ventricular arrhythmias. Thirty-seven patients with drug-resistant ventricular arrhythmias were studied. Patients in group I (n = 11) has sustained ventricular tachycardia and those in group II (n = 26) had nonsustained ventricular arrhythmias. In group I, 8 patients had remote myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure and sustained ventricular tachycardia requiring repeated cardioversion (group Ia). None of these patients responded to encainide treatment, but 6 did have an antiarrhythmic response (complete in 3 and only partial in 3) to other investigational antiarrhythmic agents. Three patients in group I, all without ischemic heart disease (group Ib), had an excellent antiarrhythmic response to encainide, as did 21 of 26 patients in group II. In 4 of 5 patients in group II who did not respond, the dosage was limited due to the development of sinus pauses, atrioventricular block or bundle branch block, and in 3 of these 4 patients preexisting conduction disease was evident (PR longer than 0.2 second or QRS longer than 0.12 second). Diplopia occurred while taking the maximal oral dosage in the fifth patient. At 21.5 months of follow-up, 14 of the original 24 patients who responded to encainide continue to receive it; 3 have died (all due to natural progression of left ventricular dysfunction) and encainide was discontinued in 7: in 2 because of syncope, in 2 because of new-onset atrial fibrillation, in 1 patient because of exercise-induced polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, in 1 because of diplopia and in 1 because of skin exanthem.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The clinical electrophysiology of intravenous indecainide

The electrophysiologic effects of indecainide, a new class IC antiarrhythmic agent, were assessed in 10 patients with left ventricular dysfunction and inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia. Indecainide was administered intravenously in a dose of 60 to 90 mg/kg at a rate of 12.5 to 15 micrograms/kg/min. Indecainide had no effect on sinus node function or atrial and ventricular effective refractory periods. The AH (106 +/- 13 vs 130 +/- 24 msec, p less than 0.002) and HV (57 +/- 7 vs 73 +/- 19 msec, p less than 0.001) intervals were significantly increased. The QRS duration increased (102 +/- 9 vs 120 +/- 13 msec, p less than 0.001); however, the JT duration did not change. Induction of ventricular tachycardia was prevented in 1 of 10 patients. In the remaining nine patients, the ventricular tachycardia cycle length was significantly prolonged (248 +/- 47 vs 320 +/- 71 msec, p less than 0.001). Indecainide significantly depressed intracardiac conduction at several sites.

Comparative efficacy and safety of oral tocainide and quinidine for benign and potentially lethal ventricular arrhythmias

The antiarrhythmic efficacy and safety of oral tocainide hydrochloride and quinidine sulfate were compared in a double-blind, 3-center, parallel trial involving 133 patients with benign and potentially lethal ventricular arrhythmias. Baseline demographic, etiologic, functional and ventricular arrhythmia data were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Two weeks of an initial placebo period were followed by 8 weeks of active drug treatment, concluding with 4 weeks of washout. Frequent 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring was used to judge efficacy. Ten of 27 patients (37%) receiving tocainide and 12 of 24 patients (50%) receiving quinidine had a 75% reduction with drug treatment compared with the initial placebo period (p greater than 0.25). Total abolition of ventricular tachycardia occurred in 6 of 16 patients (37%) receiving tocainide and 6 of 13 patients (43%) receiving quinidine (p greater than 0.25). Conditions that required discontinuation of therapy occurred in 18 of 67 patients (27%) receiving tocainide and 16 of 66 (24%) receiving quinidine (difference not significant). More patients had dizziness during tocainide treatment and diarrhea during quinidine treatment. Quinidine caused a prolongation in the QT interval (0.03 second); tocainide caused a slight reduction (0.01 second). No important changes in vital signs or laboratory measurements were observed in left ventricular ejection fraction when measured. Thus, tocainide, the new oral analog of lidocaine, appears to be as safe as quinidine but is slightly less effective in suppressing ventricular arrhythmias.

Long-term efficacy and safety of oral encainide in the treatment of chronic ventricular ectopic activity: relationship to plasma concentrations--a French multicenter trial

To establish long-term efficacy and safety of encainide, 48 patients with chronic premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) underwent 6 months of therapy with encainide. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory ECGs were obtained at baseline for each daily dosage of 75 mg, 150 mg, and 225 mg of encainide during the in-hospital titration period and at the end of the first and sixth months during the follow-up period. There was a significant reduction in the median hourly total PVC rates from 480.6 at baseline to 2.0 at the end of the titration period with the highest dosage and to 22.1 at the last visit of the chronic dosing period. Nearly total suppression of PVCs was observed in 56% of patients at the end of the titration period and in 30% at the end of the 6-month follow-up period. The most common side effects were vertigo, vision disturbance, and headache. PR, QRS, and QTc intervals showed consistent significant increases from baseline during the various encainide trial periods. Encainide may have worsened ventricular arrhythmia in four patients who received more than 200 mg of encainide daily. Plasma concentrations of encainide and encainide metabolites showed wide interpatient variation, and no relationship was found between antiarrhythmic efficacy and plasma levels of encainide, O-demethyl-encainide, or 3-methoxy-O-demethyl-encainide.

Comparative study of encainide and disopyramide in chronic ventricular arrhythmias: a double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study

Ten patients suffering from chronic premature ventricular complexes (greater than 60/h) were treated orally in a double-blind crossover study with encainide (50 mg three times a day) and disopyramide (200 mg three times a day), with five 7 day study periods: survey, placebo, encainide or disopyramide, washout placebo and disopyramide or encainide. At the end of each 7 day period, a 12 lead electrocardiogram, a 48 hour ambulatory electrocardiogram and a treadmill exercise test were performed. Blood levels of encainide and its metabolites and of disopyramide were measured at the end of each treatment (steady state). Drug efficacy was assessed by: 1) more than 80% reduction in the number of premature ventricular complexes per 24 hours, and 2) absence of ventricular tachycardia. Encainide was effective in four patients (complete suppression of premature ventricular complexes) and ineffective in five. One patient who showed a 92% reduction in the number of premature ventricular complexes developed sustained ventricular tachycardia after 24 hours of treatment. Disopyramide was effective in three patients (greater than 80% reduction in the number of premature ventricular complexes) and ineffective in seven patients. With encainide, the percent increase in PR, QRS and QT interval duration was, respectively: 32.7 (p less than 0.001), 30.8 (p less than 0.001) and 10.6% (p less than 0.01). With disopyramide this increase was not significant. Despite the variability of drug blood levels, a relation between blood levels and suppression of premature ventricular complexes on the 48 hour ambulatory electrocardiogram was found with encainide, but not with disopyramide.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Procainamide: clinical pharmacology and efficacy against ventricular arrhythmias

Procainamide (PA) has been a mainstay of treatment against acute and chronic supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias for more than 30 years. PA's clinical pharmacology has been studied extensively and its bioavailability (75-95%); volume of distribution (1.5-2.5 liters per kg), plasma protein-binding (15-25%), half-time for elimination (3-7 hours), and metabolism are known. PA's efficacy against acute ventricular arrhythmias and chronic stable VPDs is associated with plasma drug concentrations of 4 to 10 micrograms per ml; but much higher plasma concentrations may be required against sustained ventricular arrhythmias. From 30 to 60% of a PA dose is excreted as the metabolite, N-acetylprocainamide (NAPA), and PA's metabolism is determined genetically (fast or slow acetylation phenotype). Studies in patients with VPDs indicate that NAPA is also antiarrhythmic, although the contribution of NAPA to the antiarrhythmic effect after PA is not known. Studies in patients with the systemic lupus-like syndrome from PA show that NAPA is not associated with this. Investigations comparing efficacy and adverse effects of PA with those of new antiarrhythmic agents available for clinical trials are indicated in the future.

Increased incidence of side effects after encainide: a newly developed antiarrhythmic drug

In a clinical trial the efficacy of encainide, a newly developed class I antiarrhythmic agent, was compared with the well-known mexiletine. Nine patients with different underlying cardiac disease and chronic complex ventricular ectopies (documented by 24-h Holter monitoring, confirmed during the initial placebo period) entered the study. The dosage of encainide was increased from 25 to 75 mg three times daily and the antiarrhythmic effect monitored by repeated 24-h Holter registration and in some patients by treadmill exercise testing. During the clinical followup we noted a high incidence of so-called "minor side effects" (headache, dizziness, blurred vision, tremor, and nausea), which caused us to terminate the study. In all instances adverse effects emerged before ectopic activity was suppressed satisfactorily prohibiting further increment of dosage. These results indicate that encainide cannot be regarded as an antiarrhythmic drug of first choice in routine clinical application.

Therapy with investigational antiarrhythmic drugs

The investigational antiarrhythmic agents available for use in this country are predominantly class I drugs with local anesthetic membrane effects. These drugs are often used successfully to control arrhythmias refractory to treatment with the standard antiarrhythmic drugs. Side effects often limit their use, and particular attention needs to be paid to their cardiac side effects, such as exacerbation of arrhythmia or enhanced conduction defects.

Comparative effect of disopyramide and ethmozine in suppressing complex ventricular arrhythmias by use of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, longitudinal crossover design

This placebo-controlled, double-blind, longitudinal crossover study compares the efficacy of disopyramide and ethmozine, a new investigational drug, in suppressing frequent (40 or more per hour) ventricular premature depolarizations (VPDs) in 27 patients completing a 37 day protocol. Although both drugs significantly reduced VPDs relative to placebo, ethmozine was a superior antiarrhythmic drug in ach9eving near-total abolition of VPDs (30% of patients), which was never observed during disopyramide dosing (p less than .05). At the 80% VPD reduction level, ethmozine was effective in 56% of all patients compared with an effectiveness in only 22% of patients during disopyramide therapy (p less than .05). The mean peak plasma level of ethmozine was 0.66 +/- 0.8 micrograms/ml, which significantly fell to a trough level of 0.1 +/- 0.08 micrograms/ml (p less than .001). Mean peak and trough plasma levels of disopyramide exhibited less fluctuation (2.6 +/- 0.9 micrograms/ml vs 2.2 +/- 0.9 micrograms/ml). Ethmozine had no effect on the QT interval, whereas disopyramide prolonged it significantly. Importantly, while disopyramide produced serious side effects in 30% of patients, ethmozine was well tolerated with no statistically significant side effects compared with placebo.

Clinical profiles of newer class I antiarrhythmic agents--tocainide, mexiletine, encainide, flecainide and lorcainide

New class I antiarrhythmic drugs differ in potency, adverse effects and pharmacokinetics. Encainide and flecainide can totally suppress arrhythmias in some patients, but arrhythmia induction can also occur. At effective dose levels, neurologic and gastrointestinal adverse effects are uncommon. Flecainide pharmacokinetics are suitable for oral use but encainide disposition is complex with variable bioavailability and active metabolites that contribute substantially to activity. Lorcainide is also potent, but neurologic adverse effects are common and dose-dependent bioavailability and an active metabolite may complicate long-term oral therapy. Tocainide and mexiletine can suppress arrhythmias in acute myocardial infarction, during convalescence from myocardial infarction and in patients with arrhythmias resistant to other therapy. Dose-related neurologic and gastrointestinal adverse effects are common, but hemodynamic effects are minor and arrhythmia induction is rare. Tocainide disposition is reasonably predictable and stable in patients, but mexiletine disposition is less so because of variation in distribution and clearance. Although all of the newer agents have some disadvantages, their availability should increase the likelihood of success in the high-risk patient.

Importance of metabolites in antiarrhythmic therapy

The presence of metabolites with pharmacologic activity can produce unanticipated drug efficacy or toxicity. This is particularly true during treatment with drugs that have narrow therapeutic-toxic ratios, such as the antiarrhythmic agents. The presence of active metabolites can often be inferred from variability in the relation between pharmacologic effect and steady-state plasma concentrations of the parent drug. Moreover, metabolites may ordinarily be unimportant but can accumulate to therapeutic (or toxic) levels in disease states such as congestive heart failure, renal failure and hepatic failure. Further characterization of the contribution of such metabolites during treatment requires direct evaluation of their pharmacology in vitro, in animal models and, if indicated, in man. Procainamide and its active metabolite N-acetylprocainamide provide the best and most complete example of this sequence of observations. Other drugs, including quinidine, disopyramide, verapamil and the investigational agents encainide and lorcainide, have active metabolites for which pharmacologic activity is less well-defined. Further studies in this area will help reduce the frequency of antiarrhythmic drug adverse effects, make successful therapy more frequent, and perhaps allow insights into structure-activity relations.

Methods for documenting antiarrhythmic efficacy

Methods of documenting the efficacy of antiarrhythmic drugs are controversial because of wide inter- and intrasubject variability of the arrhythmias treated. In patients with symptomatic arrhythmias, clinical benefit can be inferred when symptoms are reduced or abolished, but the response cannot be quantitated. Multiple ambulatory monitoring periods before and during treatment permit determination of reductions of arrhythmia to levels of statistical significance but are costly and time-consuming. Programmed electrophysiologic induction study may be helpful in determining efficacy of some antiarrhythmic agents because of its high specificity, but its use is limited because of a low sensitivity. Titrating patients with multiple dosing into accepted plasma level therapeutic ranges may be helpful for individual patient care but does not allow quantitation. Recently, a statistical model based on linear regression analysis with established 95 and 99% confidence intervals has been used to compare efficacy of quinidine and encainide with success. Wider application of this model is suggested for determining antiarrhythmic drug efficacy.

Hemodynamic effects of encainide in patients with ventricular arrhythmia and poor ventricular function

Gated cardiac scanning was used to evaluate the hemodynamic effects of encainide in 19 patients (1 woman) with complex ventricular arrhythmia and depressed left ventricular (LV) function (ejection fraction less than 45%). Patients were 36 to 80 years old (average 61). All were candidates for long-term encainide therapy after having failed with currently available antiarrhythmics. Sixty-three percent had congestive heart failure before they received encainide. All were evaluated in the hospital before encainide therapy by a gated cardiac scan performed at least 3 days after discontinuing all antiarrhythmic drugs. Patients received oral encainide in doses of 75 to 200 mg. Gated cardiac scans were repeated 1 to 2 weeks later when an 80% reduction in frequency of premature ventricular complexes was observed on a 24-hour Holter recording. No patient had worsening of congestive heart failure during encainide therapy. Encainide did not significantly affect ejection fraction, which averaged 22 +/- 10% before and 25 +/- 14% (SD) after encainide (difference not significant [NS]). Other hemodynamic variables, including heart rate, blood pressure, stroke volume and end-diastolic volume, remained unchanged during encainide therapy. Digoxin blood levels in 10 patients averaged 1.04 +/- 0.43 before and 1.22 +/- 0.47 mg/ml (NS) during encainide therapy. Thus, encainide given orally in clinically effective doses does not appear to have significant hemodynamic effects in patients with ventricular arrhythmia and depressed LV function.

Electrophysiologic actions of O-demethyl encainide: an active metabolite

Differences between the electrophysiologic actions of the antiarrhythmic agent encainide have been reported after short-term intravenous and oral administration. Only prolongation of the HV interval and QRS duration have been described immediately after short-term intravenous administration of encainide in dogs and man. However, during oral therapy or more prolonged infusions, prolongation of the AH interval and atrial and ventricular effective refractory periods have also occurred. In most patients receiving encainide therapy, metabolites (O-demethyl encainide and 3-methoxy-O-demethyl encainide) accumulate during prolonged therapy to concentrations greater than those of the parent drug. We compared the electrophysiologic action of O-demethyl encainide with that of saline in anesthetized dogs to determine if this metabolite has pharmacologic activity and whether its electrophysiologic effects could account for the disparities noted between effects of intravenous and oral encainide therapy. An initial pharmacokinetic evaluation allowed design of a series of loading and maintenance infusions that produced plasma concentrations similar to those seen during encainide therapy in man (concentration after first maintenance dose, 149 +/- 27 ng/ml [+/- SE] and after second maintenance dose, 230 +/- 45 ng/ml). Significant increases in atrial effective refractory period and ventricular refractoriness, and prolongation of AH interval and HV conduction time were observed. These effects are similar to those reported after prolonged oral encainide therapy but are substantially different from those seen after short-term infusions of encainide. These findings indicate that the difference between the electrophysiologic actions of intravenous and oral encainide may be due to pharmacologic effects of at least one encainide metabolite, O-demethyl encainide.

Possible contribution of encainide metabolites to the long-term antiarrhythmic efficacy of encainide

To establish long-term efficacy and the relation between drug plasma concentration and antiarrhythmic response, 12 patients with encainide-responsive frequent complex ventricular ectopic activity underwent 1 year of therapy with encainide. Twenty-four hour ambulatory electrocardiograms were obtained at baseline and every 2 months. Drug withdrawal with concomitant plasma sampling and electrocardiographic monitoring was performed at 6 and 12 months. Average group premature ventricular contraction (PVC) suppression during the year was 97 to 99%, with nearly total suppression of pairs and salvos. The most common adverse effects were transient visual disturbances and dizziness or lightheadedness. During a dose interval (6 to 12 hours) the concentration of encainide metabolites exceeded that of encainide by several-fold. The median time of arrhythmia return after drug withdrawal was 12 to 14 hours. At the time of arrhythmia return encainide was generally no longer detectable but the average concentration of O-demethylencainide and 3 methoxy-O-demethylencainide was 72 +/- 49 and 172 +/- 74 ng/ml, respectively. It is concluded that encainide therapy is extremely effective for continuous long-term suppression of complex ventricular arrhythmias and its metabolites contribute significantly to its antiarrhythmic action during chronic oral therapy.

Encainide: a new and potent antiarrhythmic agent

Encainide is a potent Class I antiarrhythmic drug that prolongs conduction in the His-Purkinje system. It produces only minimal hemodynamic changes in the normal or depressed left ventricle. Studies to date demonstrate excellent effectiveness against ventricular arrhythmia, and in comparative studies with quinidine, encainide was superior in reducing the frequency and complexity of ventricular premature beats in patients late after myocardial infarction.