Afterload reduction with nifedipine in aortic insufficiency

Aortic Stenosis, Aortic Regurgitation and Arterial Hypertension

BACKGROUND

Hypertension (HT) is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease and might precipitate pathology of the aortic valve.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association of HT with aortic dysfunction (including both aortic regurgitation and stenosis) and the impact of antihypertensive treatment on the natural course of underlying aortic disease.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the literature for all relevant articles assessing the correlation between HT and phenotype of aortic disease.

RESULTS

Co-existence of HT with aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation is highly prevalent in hypertensive patients and predicts a worse prognosis. Certain antihypertensive agents may improve haemodynamic parameters (aortic jet velocity, aortic regurgitation volume) and remodeling of the left ventricle, but there is no strong evidence of benefit regarding clinical outcomes. Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, among other vasodilators, are well-tolerated in aortic stenosis.

CONCLUSION

Several lines of evidence support a detrimental association between HT and aortic valve disease. Therefore, HT should be promptly treated in aortic valvulopathy. Despite conventional wisdom, specific vasodilators can be used with caution in aortic stenosis.

Infective endocarditis of the aortic valve in a Border collie dog with patent ductus arteriosus

Infective endocarditis (IE) in dogs with cardiac shunts has not been reported previously. However, we encountered a dog with concurrent patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) and IE. The dog was a 1-year-old, 13.9-kg female Border collie and presented with anorexia, weight loss, pyrexia (40.4°C) and lameness. A continuous murmur with maximal intensity over the left heart base (Levine 5/6) was detected on auscultation. Echocardiography revealed a PDA and severe aortic stenosis (AS) caused by aortic-valve vegetative lesions. Corynebacterium spp. and Bacillus subtilis were isolated from blood cultures. The dog responded to aggressive antibiotic therapy, and the PDA was subsequently surgically corrected. After a series of treatments, the dog showed long-term improvement in clinical status.

Vasodilator therapy in patients with aortic insufficiency: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The use of vasodilators to improve long-term outcomes in asymptomatic patients with chronic aortic insufficiency (AI) is controversial.

METHODS

We reviewed MEDLINE, PREMEDLINE, Current Contents, and Cochrane databases to identify relevant clinical trials on asymptomatic patients with chronic AI of at least moderate severity. We included those studies that involved long-term vasodilator therapy (including hydralazine, calcium-channel blockers, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors) and assessed either hemodynamic and structural parameters or clinical outcomes. Data on patient demographics, study protocols, and outcomes were abstracted.

RESULTS

Ten studies with 544 asymptomatic patients with chronic AI were identified. Treatment duration with vasodilators ranged from 12 weeks to 7 years. Of these, 8 studies compared vasodilators with placebo or no therapy, with 5 demonstrating improvements in at least 1 hemodynamic or structural parameter with vasodilators and 3 showing little or no apparent benefit. The remaining 2 studies directly compared outcomes between 2 different vasodilators. Both of these studies demonstrated greater improvements in hemodynamic and structural parameters with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors compared with hydralazine and nifedipine. Clinical outcomes were primarily reported in only 2 of the 10 studies. Although one study suggested that the use of vasodilators slowed the rate of progression to surgery for aortic valve replacement, another showed no difference.

CONCLUSIONS

Vasodilators inconsistently improve hemodynamic and structural parameters in asymptomatic patients with chronic AI. In addition, the impact of vasodilators on clinical outcomes is largely uncertain and requires further study.

Are vasodilators still indicated in the treatment of severe aortic regurgitation?

Aortic regurgitation (AR) is a valve disease that causes severe complications and reduces life expectancy. Surgical correction is required in the late stages of the disease. In less advanced forms, treatment with vasodilators is a consideration. The available evidence suggests that this type of treatment has a favorable effect on the consequences of AR, particularly left ventricular remodeling. However, the impact of vasodilators on clinical endpoints complicating the course of AR remains in doubt. The limited evidence supporting or opposing the utilization of vasodilators in AR hinders drawing firm conclusions and emphasizes the process of individualized interpretation of the clinical presentation of patients with the disease.

Long-term vasodilator therapy in patients with severe aortic regurgitation

BACKGROUND

Vasodilator therapy can reduce the left ventricular volume and mass and improve left ventricular performance in patients with aortic regurgitation. Accordingly, it has been suggested that such therapy may reduce or delay the need for aortic-valve replacement.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 95 patients with asymptomatic severe aortic regurgitation and normal left ventricular function to receive open-label nifedipine (20 mg every 12 hours), open-label enalapril (20 mg per day), or no treatment (control group) to identify the possible beneficial effects of vasodilator therapy on left ventricular function and the need for aortic-valve replacement.

RESULTS

After a mean of seven years of follow-up, the rate of aortic-valve replacement was similar among the groups: 39 percent in the control group, 50 percent in the enalapril group, and 41 percent in the nifedipine group (P=0.62). In addition, there were no significant differences among the groups in aortic regurgitant volume, left ventricular size, left ventricular mass, mean wall stress, or ejection fraction. One year after valve replacement, the left ventricular end-diastolic diameter and end-systolic diameter had decreased to a similar degree among the patients who underwent surgery in each of the three groups, and all the patients had a normal ejection fraction.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term vasodilator therapy with nifedipine or enalapril did not reduce or delay the need for aortic-valve replacement in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic regurgitation and normal left ventricular systolic function. Furthermore, such therapy did not reduce the aortic regurgitant volume, decrease the size of the left ventricle, or improve left ventricular function.

Testing the test: the reliability of echocardiography in the sequential assessment of valvular regurgitation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Substantial variability in serial echocardiographic qualitative assessment of valvular regurgitation may exist. Reader variability is generally well understood, but acquisition variability (portions of variability caused by equipment, sonographers, physiologic changes) has been less frequently assessed, particularly in combination with reader variability. We attempted to determine the relative contributions of acquisition and reader variability as components of total test-retest variability for aortic (AR) and mitral (MR) regurgitation.

METHODS

Outpatient echocardiographic study was done at 2 clinical sites. Twenty-three predominantly obese middle-aged females had 3 echocardiograms, 2 performed 14 +/- 3 days apart and the third performed within 1 to 2 hours of the second. Triplets of echocardiograms were evaluated for change in grade of AR and MR. Medical history, anthropometrics, and blood pressures were obtained.

RESULTS

Average intrareader variability (percentage of reads for which there is within-reader disagreement) was 5.6% for AR and 16.7% for MR. The average total test-retest variability (percentage of reads for which there is disagreement between visits) was 29.0% for AR and 24.6% for MR. The acquisition variability for AR was 23.4% +/- 7.7%; for MR, it was 7.9% +/- 10.2%. A significant predictor of change for AR/MR was the initial grade. Change in diastolic blood pressure was positively associated with change in AR and MR.

CONCLUSIONS

Intrareader agreement was substantial for AR and MR. Components of total test-retest variability found were reader, biological (change in diastolic blood pressure), and regression to the mean. Recommendations for clinical practice include monitoring blood pressure changes and understanding the confidence limits of the clinical test. Test-retest variability and its components should be considered in echocardiography and other diagnostic testing.

Afterload reduction in severe aortic regurgitation

This study was designed to assess the effects of afterload reduction in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic regurgitation (AR) and maintained LV function by cine-MRI. We studied 13 patients at baseline and after 0.2 mg/kg Hydralazine (I.V.). Patients were stratified according to the volumetric LV response to acute afterload reduction: Group I comprised patients with improved LV response; Group II comprised patients with unchanged or deteriorated LV response. Baseline LV function and severity of AR were not significantly different between groups. However, regurgitant fraction decreased (50 +/- 12 vs. 36 +/- 9%; P < 0.03) and cardiac output increased (4.9 +/- 1.4 vs. 7.1 +/- 1.6l/minute; P < 0,001) in Group I and remained unchanged in Group II (54 +/- 10 vs. 55 +/- 10%, P = n.s. and 5.5 +/- 1.4 vs. 6.6 +/- 0.9l/minute; P = n.s.) during maximal vasodilation. Beat-to-beat analysis revealed a decrease of left ventricular endsystolic volume index in group I (48 +/- 13 vs. 37 +/- 9 ml/beat; P < 0.05) and no change in group II (61 +/- 20 vs. 62 +/- 20 ml/beat; P = n.s.). In the natural history of chronic AR, the absence of improved LV performance during acute vasodilation using beat-to-beat analysis by MRI may identify patients with more advanced cardiac adaptation to chronic volume overload.

Aortic Regurgitation

Left ventricular (LV) systolic function is an important determinant of long-term prognosis in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation (AR). Impaired LV systolic function identifies a group of patients who are at risk of developing postoperative congestive heart failure and death after aortic valve replacement (AVR). Hence, asymptomatic patients with definite evidence of impaired LV function should undergo operation without waiting for the development of symptoms or more severe LV dysfunction. Among asymptomatic patients with normal LV systolic function (normal ejection fraction), prognosis is excellent, and fewer than 5% per year require surgery because of symptom development or LV dysfunction. Patients likely to require surgery can be identified on the basis of age, severity of LV dilatation, and progressive increase in LV dimensions or decrease in resting ejection fraction during the course of serial follow-up studies. Afterload-reducing therapy in asymptomatic patients with severe AR and normal LV function has beneficial hemodynamic effects; chronic therapy may reduce the likelihood of symptoms or LV systolic dysfunction. Aortic valve replacement should be performed once significant symptoms develop. In the absence of important symptoms, the operation should also be performed in patients with AR who manifest consistent and reproducible evidence of either LV contractile dysfunction at rest or extreme LV dilatation. Noninvasive imaging should play a major role in evaluation. An important clinical decision--such as recommending AVR in the asymptomatic patient--should not be based on a single echocardiographic or radionuclide angiographic measurement. When these data consistently indicate impaired contractile function at rest or extreme LV dilatation on repeat measurement, however, operation is indicated in the asymptomatic patient. This strategy should reduce the likelihood of irreversible LV dysfunction in these patients and enhance long-term postoperative survival.

Vasodilatation with felodipine in chronic asymptomatic aortic regurgitation

BACKGROUND

Afterload reduction decreases volume overload on the left ventricle and may thereby delay the need for valve replacement in chronic asymptomatic aortic regurgitation. The aims of this randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial were to examine short- and long-term hemodynamic effects of felodipine in chronic asymptomatic aortic regurgitation.

METHODS

Sixteen patients were randomly assigned to an intravenous infusion of either felodipine 0. 3 mg or placebo followed by 3 months' treatment with felodipine 10 mg or placebo orally once daily. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed at baseline, immediately after intravenous treatment, and after 3 months of oral treatment.

RESULTS

Intravenous felodipine caused a statistically significant reduction in the systemic vascular resistance from (mean +/- SD) 1160 +/- 400 to 970 +/- 320 dynes. s. cm(-5) (P <.05), in the regurgitant volume index from 1.5 +/- 0.8 to 1.3 +/- 0.8 L. min(-1). m(-2) (P <.05), and in the regurgitant fraction from 0.31 +/- 0.15 to 0.26 +/- 0.14 (P <.05). The forward cardiac output index increased significantly from 3.2 +/- 0.9 to 3.5 +/- 0.7 L. min(-1). m(-2) (P <.05). Three months of oral treatment with felodipine caused a corresponding but more pronounced decrease in systemic vascular resistance of 880 +/- 330 dynes. s. cm(-5) (P <.05), regurgitant volume index of 1.2 +/- 0.7 L. min(-1). m(-2) (P <.05), and regurgitant fraction 0.25 +/- 0.11 (P <.05), whereas the forward cardiac output index increased to 3.6 +/- 0.7 L. min(-1). m(-2) (P <.05). No significant changes were found in the placebo group. Left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction remained unaffected by treatment, but compared with the placebo group left ventricular myocardial mass decreased significantly from 137 +/- 24 to 132 +/- 21 g. m(-2) (P <.01).

CONCLUSION

In chronic asymptomatic aortic regurgitation, felodipine causes beneficial hemodynamic effects that may postpone the need for valve replacement.

Timing of surgery in chronic aortic regurgitation

When deciding on therapy for aortic regurgitation (AR), it is imperative to distinguish between acute and chronic AR. Symptoms and echocardiographic findings are essential in distinguishing acute from chronic AR and in assessing the severity. Vasodilators have been shown to be helpful in treating patients with chronic severe AR. The timing of aortic valve replacement in chronic severe AR remains controversial. Symptoms, left ventricular function, and response to exercise have been shown to be the most important prognostic indicators.

Analytical expression of effective afterload in aortic and mitral regurgitation

Effective arterial elastance (Ea) is the coupling parameter between the left ventricle and peripheral circulation in normal subjects. If left ventricular end systolic pressure (Pes), contractility (Es) and Ea are known, left ventricular end diastolic volume (LVEDV) and ejection fraction of the ventricle are completely determined. The aim of this study was to give an analytical expression for Ea in patients with mitral and aortic regurgitation, and predict both LVEDV and the effect of vasodilator therapy on LVEDV. Twenty-three subjects with atypical chest pain, 15 patients with mitral insufficiency and 11 with aortic insufficiency underwent diagnostic cardiac catheterization, coronary angiography, and left ventricular cineangiography, which was analyzed quantitatively. Ea was 2.05 +/- 0.63 in normal subjects, while it was 1.28 +/- 0.71 and 1.57 +/- 0.87 in patients with mitral and aortic insufficiency, respectively. All these groups differed with ANOVA test (p = 0.0031). We tested the ability of the analytical expressions for Ea in normal subjects, and patients with mitral insufficiency or aortic insufficiency to predict measured Ea and LVEDV. Ea and LVEDV were predicted rather accurately in every case (p < 0.0001). We used published data to test the effect of resistance modulation on LVEDV. Predicted and measured LVEDV were linearly correlated both in aortic (p < 0.0001) and mitral insufficiency (p = 0.027). Moreover, in some cases a left ventricular enlargement after vasodilator therapy could be anticipated because of an unbalanced decrease in resistance and heart rate. Ea seems to be the coupling parameter between the left ventricle and the peripheral circulation not only in normal subjects, but also in patients with mitral or aortic regurgitation; its measurement before administering vasodilating drugs may be useful in order to predict the effects on LVEDV, and achieve an optimal ventriculoarterial coupling.

Impact of vascular adaptation to chronic aortic regurgitation on left ventricular performance

BACKGROUND

This investigation was designed to test the hypothesis that vascular adaptation occurs in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation to maintain left ventricular (LV) performance.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Forty-five patients with chronic aortic regurgitation (mean age 50+/-14 years) were studied using a micromanometer LV catheter to obtain LV pressures and radionuclide ventriculography to obtain LV volumes during multiple loading conditions and right atrial pacing. These 45 patients were subgrouped according to their LV contractility (Ees) and ejection fraction values. Group I consisted of 24 patients with a normal Ees. Group IIa consisted of 10 patients with impaired Ees values (Ees <1.00 mm Hg/mL) but normal LV ejection fractions; Group IIb consisted of 11 patients with impaired contractility and reduced LV ejection fractions. The left ventricular-arterial coupling ratio, Ees/Ea, where Ea was calculated by dividing the LV end-systolic pressure by LV stroke volume, averaged 1.60+/-0.91 in Group I. It decreased to 0.91+/-0.27 in Group IIa (P<0.05 versus Group I), and it decreased further in Group IIb to 0.43+/-0.24 (P<0.001 versus Groups I and IIa). The LV ejection fractions were inversely related to the Ea values in both the normal and impaired contractility groups (r=-0.48, P<0.05 and r=-0.56, P<0.01, respectively), although the slopes of these relationships differed (P<0.05). The average LV work was maximal in Group IIa when the left ventricular-arterial coupling ratio was near 1.0 because of a significant decrease in total arterial elastance (P<0.01 versus Group I). In contrast, the decrease in the left ventricular-arterial coupling ratio in Group IIb was caused by an increase in total arterial elastance, effectively double loading the LV, contributing to a decrease in LV pump efficiency (P<0.01 versus Group IIa and P<0.001 versus Group I).

CONCLUSIONS

Vascular adaptation may be heterogeneous in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation. In some, total arterial elastance decreases to maximize LV work and maintain LV performance, whereas in others, it increases, thereby double loading the LV, contributing to afterload excess and a deterioration in LV performance that is most prominent in those with impaired contractility.

Chronic aortic regurgitation. Role of medical therapy and optimal timing for surgery

Aortic valve replacement should be performed once significant symptoms develop. Lacking important symptoms, operation should also be performed in patients with aortic regurgitation who manifest consistent and reproducible evidence of either LV contractile dysfunction at rest or extreme LV dilation. Noninvasive imaging techniques should play a major role in this evaluation. An important clinical decision, such as recommending aortic valve replacement in the asymptomatic patient, should not be based on a single echocardiographic or radionuclide angiographic measurement alone. When these data consistently indicate impaired contractile function at rest or extreme LV dilation on repeat measurements, however, operation is indicated in the asymptomatic patient. This strategy should reduce the likelihood of irreversible LV dysfunction in these patients and enhance long-term postoperative survival.

Beneficial effects of 1-year captopril therapy in children with chronic aortic regurgitation who have no symptoms

OBJECTIVE

This prospective study was performed to assess the effects of 1 year of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition with captopril in 20 children (mean age 14.3+/-2.3 years) with asymptomatic chronic aortic regurgitation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

At 12 months patients receiving captopril had a significant reduction in left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic dimensions (57+/-9.3 vs 51+/-9.5 mm, p < 0.001; 35.4+/-6.1 vs 32+/-6.8 mm, p < 0.001), end-diastolic and end-systolic volume indexes (111+/-36 vs 94+/-29 ml/m2, p < 0.001; 35+/-13 vs 30+/-12 ml/m2, p < 0.001, respectively), and mass index (138+/-37 vs 109+/-32 gm/m2, p < 0.0001) determined by two-dimensional echocardiography. Meridian (p < 0.01) and circumferential (p < 0.0001) wall stresses also decreased significantly with therapy. Significant reduction (27.8%, p < 0.0001) was achieved in regurgitant fraction with captopril.

CONCLUSIONS

These data show that the long-term therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors is able to reverse left ventricular dilation and hypertrophy and suggest that such therapy has the potential to favorably influence the natural history of the disease in children.

Vasoactive drugs in chronic regurgitant lesions of the mitral and aortic valves

This review examines the results of vasodilator therapy in patients with chronic regurgitant lesions of the aortic and mitral valves. The analysis includes those studies which provide data on hemodynamic measurements, left ventricular systolic function, ventricular volumes and regurgitant flow. In patients with chronic aortic or mitral regurgitation, the short-term administration of nitroprusside, hydralazine, nifedipine or an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor produces salutary hemodynamic effects. The major difference in the response to combined preload and afterload reduction (i.e., nitroprusside) in patients with aortic versus mitral regurgitation was that forward stroke volume generally increased and ejection fraction remained unchanged in mitral regurgitation, whereas ejection fraction generally increased and forward stroke volume remained unchanged in aortic regurgitation. These observations suggest that a reciprocal relation between regurgitant and forward flow characterizes the response to preload and afterload reduction in mitral regurgitation (through a preload-dependent dynamic regurgitant orifice), whereas correction of afterload mismatch dominates the response in aortic regurgitation. In studies of long-term vasodilator therapy in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation, a reduction in left ventricular volumes and regurgitant fraction, with or without an increase in ejection fraction, has been observed during treatment with hydralazine, nifedipine and ACE inhibitors. Patients with the largest, sickest hearts generally benefit the most from treatment with vasoactive drugs. Nonetheless, favorable ventricular remodeling has been reported in asymptomatic patients, and long-term nifedipine use has delayed the need for operation in asymptomatic patients with chronic aortic regurgitation. For patients with chronic mitral regurgitation, definition of the etiology of the lesion is a prerequisite for choosing appropriate therapy. Excluding patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and mitral valve prolapse, and some with fixed-orifice (i.e., rheumatic) mitral regurgitation, the signal importance of preload reduction suggests that the preferred long-term therapy for symptomatic chronic mitral regurgitation is an ACE inhibitor. There are no long-term studies that support the use of vasodilator therapy in asymptomatic patients with chronic mitral regurgitation.

Nifedipine in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic regurgitation and normal left ventricular function

BACKGROUND

Vasodilator therapy with nifedipine reduces left ventricular volume and mass and increases the ejection fraction in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic regurgitation.

METHODS

To assess whether vasodilator therapy reduces or delays the need for valve replacement, we randomly assigned 143 asymptomatic patients with isolated, severe aortic regurgitation and normal left ventricular systolic function to receive either nifedipine (20 mg twice daily, 69 patients) or digoxin (0.25 mg daily, 74 patients).

RESULTS

By actuarial analysis, we determined that after six years a mean (+/- SD) of 34 +/- 6 percent of the patients in the digoxin group had undergone valve replacement, as compared with only 15 +/- 3 percent of those in the nifedipine group (P < 0.001). In the digoxin group, valve replacement (in a total of 20 patients) was performed because of left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction < 50 percent) in 75 percent, left ventricular dysfunction plus symptoms in 10 percent, and symptoms alone in 15 percent. In the nifedipine group, all six patients who underwent valve replacement did so because of the development of left ventricular dysfunction. In addition, all the patients in both groups who underwent aortic-valve replacement had an increase of 15 percent or more in the left ventricular end-diastolic volume index. After aortic-valve replacement, 12 of the 16 patients (75 percent) in the digoxin group and all six patients in the nifedipine group who had had an abnormal left ventricular ejection fraction before surgery had a normal ejection fraction.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term vasodilator therapy with nifedipine reduces or delays the need for aortic-valve replacement in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic regurgitation and normal left ventricular systolic function.

Effects of stopping long-term vasodilator therapy in patients with chronic aortic insufficiency

We studied the effects of stopping long-term vasodilator therapy in 17 patients with chronic stable aortic insufficiency. These patients received hydralazine for 37 +/- 15 months (mean +/- SD) and, as a result, had experienced a significant decrease in left ventricular volumes. All patients were followed clinically and ten of the patients underwent serial radionuclide evaluation at baseline, while receiving drug, and at 20 +/- 7 months after stopping drug therapy. No patient showed evidence of acute clinical deterioration when drug therapy was stopped. The rate of progression to valve replacement due to onset of symptoms or left ventricular dysfunction was not significantly different from that previously reported in a population with similar characteristics. Left ventricular size, however, returned to levels similar to baseline after drug therapy was stopped. We conclude that long-term vasodilator therapy may be discontinued in patients with chronic stable aortic insufficiency without causing clinical deterioration or significant alteration in rate of progression to valve replacement.

Effects of long-term vasodilator therapy on electrocardiographic abnormalities in chronic aortic regurgitation

Electrocardiographic abnormalities develop in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation (AR). Although vasodilator drugs may reduce left ventricular (LV) volume overload, the effects of such therapy on electrocardiographic abnormalities have not been previously evaluated. Accordingly, electrocardiograms were analyzed before and after double-blind, randomized administration of either hydralazine or placebo in 54 patients with chronic AR. These patients were without limiting symptoms and had preserved ejection fraction on entry in the study. The magnitude of ST-segment depression and Romhilt-Estes point score for LV hypertrophy were assessed. Baseline ST depression and LV hypertrophy scores in the placebo and hydralazine groups were not significantly different. At follow-up, after a mean of 19 +/- 6 months, there was a significant reduction in ST depression in patients taking hydralazine (n = 28) compared with patients given placebo (n = 26): -0.023 +/- 0.044 vs 0.029 +/- 0.055 mV, respectively (p = 0.0001); and in the LV hypertrophy score (-1.1 +/- 2.2 vs 0.9 +/- 2.3 points, respectively; p = 0.002). Hydralazine-treated patients also had significant decreases in LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volume indexes, and a significant increase in ejection fraction. These results suggest that such vasodilator therapy may be beneficial in patients with chronic AR.

Effect of digoxin and vasodilators on left ventricular function in aortic regurgitation

In order to assess the relative value of digoxin, nifedipine and hydralazine on left ventricular performance at rest and during exercise, we studied 10 men with moderately severe chronic aortic regurgitation using two-dimensional echocardiography. Digoxin after one month at therapeutic serum levels increased resting ejection fraction as compared to control [0.54 +/- 0.08 (SD) vs 0.47 +/- 0.08, respectively, P less than 0.03]. Ejection fraction decreased during exercise but the difference between digoxin and control was maintained. Stroke volume also was higher on digoxin than control at rest (93 +/- 15 vs 83 +/- 17 ml, P less than 0.02) and the larger stroke volume on digoxin was maintained during exercise. By contrast, stroke volume was reduced by one month of therapy with maximally tolerated nifedipine doses compared to control (74 +/- 8 vs 83 +/- 17 ml, P = 0.03) and this difference was maintained during exercise. Hydralazine in doses up to 225 mg/day for one month produced no significant changes in left ventricular performance compared to control at rest or during exercise. However, compared to digoxin ejection fraction at peak exercise was significantly less on hydralazine (0.39 +/- 0.9 vs 0.52 +/- 10, P less than 0.02). These data suggest that digoxin improved left ventricular performance and may be of benefit in the treatment of patients with chronic aortic regurgitation.

Hemodynamic effects of nitroglycerin in an experimental model of acute aortic regurgitation

Afterload reduction is an accepted therapeutic modality for the treatment of congestive heart failure caused by chronic aortic regurgitation. However, the role of vasodilator therapy in acute aortic incompetence has not been established. To investigate this, left ventricular volume overload was produced in 18 dogs by constructing a valved conduit from the descending thoracic aorta to the left ventricular apex. The time course of aortic, pulmonary and conduit flows was analyzed in eight control studies and established stability of the experimental model. In the remaining 10 dogs, intravenous nitroglycerin, titrated to reduce mean aortic blood pressure by 40%, and placebo (ethanol) were each infused for 20 min periods. Compared with placebo, nitroglycerin significantly reduced aortic flow (3,945 +/- 324 to 3,397 +/- 362 ml/min, p less than 0.01), regurgitant flow (1,304 +/- 131 to 764 +/- 90 ml/min, p less than 0.001), septal-lateral end-diastolic diameter (47.5 +/- 1.8 to 46.5 +/- 1.8 mm, p less than 0.001), left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (6.9 +/- 0.8 to 6.0 +/- 0.6 mm Hg, p less than 0.05), left ventricular stroke work (19.0 +/- 2.6 to 10.8 +/- 1.7 g-m/beat, p less than 0.001) and systemic vascular resistance (2,253 +/- 173 to 1,433 +/- 117 dyne-s/cm5, p less than 0.001). In contrast, pulmonary flow, left anterior descending coronary flow and subendocardial pH did not change during infusion of either nitroglycerin or placebo. These data indicate that by decreasing preload and afterload, and by preserving coronary flow and tissue pH, nitroglycerin effectively reduced ventricular and regurgitant volumes in the setting of acute volume overload.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effect of electrical stimulus parameters on the development and propagation of action potentials in short excitable fibres

Intracellular action potentials (IAPs) produced by short fibres in response to their electrical stimulation were analysed. IAPs were calculated on the basis of the Hodgkin-Huxley (1952) model by the method described by Joyner et al. (1978). Principal differences were found in processes of activation of short (semilength L less than 5 lambda) and long fibres under near-threshold stimulation. The shorter the fibre, the lower was the threshold value (Ithr). Dependence of the latency on the stimulus strength (Ist) was substantially non-linear and was affected by the fibre length. Both fibre length and stimulus strength influenced the IAP amplitude, the instantaneous propagation velocity (IPV) and the site of the first origin of the IAP (and, consequently, excitability of the short fibre membrane). With L less than or equal to 2 lambda and Ithr less than or equal to Ist less than or equal to 1.1Ithr, IPV could reach either very high values (so that all the fibre membrane fired practically simultaneously) or even negative values. The latter corresponded to the first origin of the propagated IAP, not at the site of stimulation but at the fibre termination or at a midpoint. The characters of all the above dependencies were unchanged irrespective of the manner of approaching threshold (variation of stimulus duration or its strength). Reasons for differences in processes of activation of short and long fibres are discussed in terms of electrical load and latency. Applications of the results to explain an increased jitter, velocity recovery function and velocity-diameter relationship are also discussed.

Long-term vasodilator therapy of chronic aortic insufficiency. A randomized double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial

Although vasodilator drugs acutely reduce regurgitation and improve cardiac performance in aortic insufficiency, their long-term effects on left ventricular size and function are uncertain. Consequently, we performed a double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial using hydralazine in 80 minimally symptomatic patients who had clinically stable, moderate-to-severe aortic insufficiency. Patients randomized to hydralazine displayed a progressive reduction in left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI) measured by radionuclide angiography, the predetermined end point of the study. At 24 months, mean LVEDVI had been reduced by 30 +/- 38 ml/m2, an 18% reduction from baseline. In contrast, LVEDVI changed minimally in patients randomized to placebo, and the intergroup differences over time were statistically significant (p less than 0.03). The hydralazine group also experienced reductions in left ventricular end-systolic volume index and increases in ejection fraction that were significantly different (both p less than 0.01) from changes in placebo-treated patients. These findings show that long-term treatment with hydralazine reduces the volume overload in aortic insufficiency and suggest that such therapy may have a beneficial effect on the natural history of the disease.

Calcium channel antagonists. Part III: Use and comparative efficacy in hypertension and supraventricular arrhythmias. Minor indications

The major antihypertensive mechanism of calcium antagonists is by decreasing the systemic vascular resistance, modified by the counter-regulatory responses of the baroreflexes and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. In severe hypertension, the concept that calcium overload of the vascular myocyte could precipitate or aggravate peripheral vasoconstriction provides a logical basis for the use of these agents as first choice therapy; nifedipine, especially, has been well tested. As monotherapy for mild to moderate hypertension each of the three first-generation agents compares well with beta-blockers. Calcium antagonists may have a special role in the therapy of certain patient groups (elderly, black) or in those subjects whose life style involves intense physical or mental exertion (hemodynamics better maintained than with beta-blockade) or in patients with early end-organ damage such as left ventricular hypertrophy or renal insufficiency. However, the goal blood pressure may not be reached during monotherapy so that drug combinations may be required. Further indications for these compounds are as follows. Verapamil and diltiazem are frequently used in supraventricular tachycardias including acute and chronic atrial fibrillation. In the arrhythmias of the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, there is the potential danger of provocation of anterograde conduction. Further indications for calcium antagonists, still under evaluation, include congestive heart failure (controversial), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (verapamil), primary pulmonary hypertension (high doses required), Raynaud's phenomenon (nifedipine and diltiazem effective), peripheral vascular disease (proof not yet documented), cerebral insufficiency and subarachnoid hemorrhage (nimodipine promising), migraine, exertional bronchospasm, renal disease, atherosclerosis (experimental), and primary aldosteronism (nifedipine inhibits aldosterone release). Second-generation agents include dihydropyridines, such as nitrendipine, nicardipine, felodipine, amlodipine, nisoldipine, nimodipine, and isradipine. From these will be selected agents that are longer acting and provide higher vascular selectivity. New preparations of existing agents include slow-release formulations of nifedipine, verapamil, and diltiazem. Minor side effects include those caused by vasodilation (flushing and headaches), constipation (verapamil), and ankle edema. Serious side effects are rare and result from improper use of these agents, as when intravenous verapamil is given to patients with sinus or atrioventricular nodal depression from drugs or disease, or nifedipine to patients with aortic stenosis. The potential of a marked negative inotropic effect is usually offset by afterload reduction, especially in the case of nifedipine. Yet caution is required when calcium antagonists, especially verapamil, are given to patients with myocardial failure unless caused by hypertensive heart disease. Drug interactions of calcium antagonists occur with other cardiovascular agents such as alpha-adrenergic blockers, beta-adrenergic blockers, digoxin, quinidine, and disopyramide.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Prognostic importance of the immediate hemodynamic response to nifedipine in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction

To determine the clinical significance of the occurrence of hemodynamic deterioration after the administration of calcium channel blocking drugs, nifedipine (20 mg orally) was administered to 29 patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction. Thirteen patients showed hemodynamic improvement with the drug (Group 1), as shown by a notable increase in cardiac index associated with a modest decrease in mean arterial pressure. The other 16 patients exhibited hemodynamic deterioration after nifedipine (Group 2), as reflected by a decline in right and left ventricular stroke work indexes accompanied by a marked hypotensive response. These differences were not related to differences in the peripheral vascular response to nifedipine, because both groups showed similar decreases in systemic and pulmonary vascular resistances. Groups 1 (hemodynamic improvement) and 2 (hemodynamic deterioration) were similar with respect to all demographic variables and pretreatment left ventricular performance (cardiac index, left ventricular filling pressure and systemic vascular resistance). Yet, the 1 year actuarial survival in patients in Group 1 was substantially better than that in patients in Group 2 (67 versus 23%, p = 0.009). Group 2, however, had higher values for plasma renin activity (17.7 +/- 6.0 versus 4.3 +/- 1.4 mg/ml per h, p less than 0.05), lower values for serum sodium concentration (134.6 +/- 1.2 versus 139.2 +/- 0.6 mEq/liter, p less than 0.05) and higher values for mean right atrial pressure (15.8 +/- 2.0 versus 7.9 +/- 1.4 mm Hg, p less than 0.01) than did patients in Group 1.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Characterization of the dose-concentration-dependent hemodynamic effects of nifedipine in heart failure

The hemodynamic effects of increasing oral doses of nifedipine (10 to 30 mg) were studied in 12 patients who had low output heart failure. With each set of hemodynamics, serum concentrations of nifedipine were measured to determine the concentration/response relationships. Eleven of twelve patients responded acutely to nifedipine, defined as a reduction in systemic vascular resistance (SVR), and an augmentation in cardiac index (CI) and stroke volume index (SVI). The differential dose effects (X +/- SD) for SVR and SVI for baseline (N = 11), 10 mg (N = 10), 20 mg (N = 3) and 30 mg (N = 4) were: 1913 +/- 486, 1102 +/- 221, 1128 +/- 166, 803 +/- 176 and 17.9 +/- 4.8, 23.8 +/- 4.5, 31 +/- 0.42, 33 +/- 3.5, respectively. All nifedipine doses reduced SVR and increased CI and SVI compared with baseline (P less than .001). The increase in CI and SVI was significantly correlated to the mg/kg dose of nifedipine (r = 0.79; P less than .001). Nifedipine administration resulted in no significant change in central venous pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, or pulmonary vascular resistance. No relationship could be demonstrated between serum concentrations of nifedipine and any hemodynamic effect. Conclusions drawn were: (1) the afterload reduction effects of nifedipine are acutely efficacious in a large portion of patients with heart failure and this activity supercedes the negative inotropic effects of the drug at doses between 10 and 30 mg; (2) the magnitude of the hemodynamic effects are dose dependent.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Experience with calcium antagonist drugs in congestive heart failure

Several clinical studies have demonstrated beneficial hemodynamic effects of calcium antagonist drugs when used as arterial vasodilators in the treatment of certain patients with moderate to severe congestive heart failure. These drugs usually decrease systemic vascular resistance and improve ejection phase indexes of left ventricular function in such patients. However, calcium antagonists have intrinsic negative inotropic effects and other vasodilators such as nitroprusside, hydralazine and captopril appear to be more beneficial when used in the treatment of severe congestive heart failure.

Captopril mediated decrease of aortic regurgitation

The effect of captopril mediated afterload reduction on aortic regurgitation was investigated in 10 patients. Regurgitation was quantitated by means of the regurgitation fraction and the relation of regurgitant volume to end diastolic volume. These variables were derived from gated radionuclide ventriculography. After captopril treatment the blood concentration of angiotensin I rose whereas that of angiotensin II fell significantly. The conversion of angiotensin I to II was reduced to about 50% of the control value. Whereas blood pressure and heart rate did not change significantly, the regurgitation fraction and the regurgitant volume, normalised to end diastolic volume, were significantly reduced by captopril treatment. The ejection fraction remained essentially unchanged. These findings suggest that captopril reduces aortic regurgitation by reducing afterload.

Hemodynamic effects of verapamil in left ventricular valvular volume overload

The hemodynamic consequences of aortic and mitral insufficiency may be influenced by the high systemic vascular resistance often seen in these patients. Since the calcium antagonists have been shown to reduce systemic vascular resistance, we evaluated the effects of intravenous verapamil in 23 patients. In 11 patients with aortic insufficiency, verapamil resulted in a 20% increase in cardiac index (p less than 0.001), 18% increase in forward stroke volume index (p less than 0.001), and a 24% decrease in regurgitant fraction (p less than 0.005). In the 12 patients with mitral insufficiency, verapamil resulted in a 19% increase in both cardiac index (p = 0.004), and forward stroke volume index (p less than 0.001), while there was a 19% decrease in regurgitant fraction (p less than 0.02). Left ventricular end-systolic stress decreased significantly in both groups as did end-diastolic stress in the mitral insufficiency group. There was no significant change in several measures of contractile performance, though the end-systolic stress-to-volume index ratio fell significantly (p less than 0.04) in the mitral insufficiency group. Our findings suggest that the vasodilatory effects of intravenous verapamil predominate over the negative inotropic effects in patients with aortic and mitral insufficiency. Verapamil may be of use in patients intolerant to other vasodilators, patients with concomitant ischemic heart disease, or those with supraventricular arrhythmias.

Noninvasive assessment of acute effects of nifedipine on rest and exercise hemodynamics and cardiac function in patients with aortic regurgitation

The acute effects of nifedipine (20 mg sublingually) on hemodynamics and cardiac function were studied at rest and during supine bicycle exercise in 20 patients with aortic regurgitation. At rest, heart rate increased by 13%, systemic vascular resistance decreased by 34% and regurgitant index decreased by 17%. The change in systemic vascular resistance was related to its initial rest level (r = 0.82, p less than 0.001) and to the changes in forward cardiac output (r = 0.58, p less than 0.01) and regurgitant index (r = 0.60, p less than 0.01). Left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes, stroke volume and ejection fraction were unchanged, whereas right ventricular ejection fraction increased. During exercise, nifedipine administration further increased heart rate by 8% and decreased systemic vascular resistance by 19%. Both forward stroke volume and forward cardiac output increased, but total left ventricular stroke volume was unchanged, resulting in a significant decrease in regurgitant index. Although left ventricular end-diastolic volume was slightly decreased, end-systolic volume did not increase; thus, ejection fraction was higher than that during control exercise (p less than 0.01). Right ventricular ejection fraction increased further. In aortic regurgitation, the acute administration of nifedipine improved cardiac performance and reduced regurgitation at rest and during exercise as a result of afterload reduction and increased heart rate. Whether these beneficial effects will occur during long-term therapy requires further investigation.

Calcium channel blockers in emergency medicine

Diltiazem, nifedipine, and verapamil inhibit calcium entry into cells via different mechanisms with different pharmacologies. They display different relative effects on different cardiovascular functions, a complex interplay of direct actions and adrenergic reflexes. Peripheral arterial vasorelaxation causes adrenergic reflex activity which opposes their direct negative chronotropic, dromotropic, inotropic, and hypotensive actions. Verapamil's most potent activity is electrophysiologic, and nifedipine's effects are hemodynamic; diltiazem acts like a less-potent combination of verapamil and nifedipine. All three drugs are efficacious in angina. These three drugs may not be interchangeable in all patients, but individualization of therapy is possible. Future indications for calcium channel blocker therapy may include hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, cerebral vasospasm, migraine headaches, pulmonary hypertension, asthma, esophageal spasm, intestinal ischemia, Raynaud's phenomenon, dysmenorrhea, and premature labor.