Differential effects of sotalol and metoprolol on induction of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia

Does Sotalol Still Have a Role in the Management of Arrhythmias?

Despite proven effectiveness in treating tachyarrhythmias, sotalol is proarrhythmic and can cause torsades de pointes. Given the emergence of studies that show no benefit from rhythm control strategies in managing atrial fibrillation, as well as the introduction of nonpharmacological approaches to treating arrhythmias, we felt it necessary to ascertain if there was any role for sotalol given its side effects. Review of the literature regarding sotalol use in the prevention and treatment of supraventricular and ventricular tachyarrhythmias seems to show that more effective and safer agents and nonpharmacological alternatives are currently available. However, sotalol still seems to be useful in preventing supraventricular tachyarrhythmias postcardiac surgery and in reverting hemodynamically stable sustained ventricular tachycardias in the setting of coronary artery disease. Its role in the prevention of tachyarrhythmias in the setting of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy requires further investigation.

The Use of Intravenous Sotalol in Cardiac Arrhythmias

Sotalol is a non-selective beta-adrenergic blocking agent without intrinsic sympathomimetic activity. It has the additional unique property of producing pronounced prolongation of the cardiac action potential duration. Sotalol therapy has been indicated for the management of supraventricular arrhythmias, refractory life threatening ventricular arrhythmias and atrial fibrillation/flutter. Until recently, sotalol was only available in the oral form, however, it was approved for intravenous administration by the US Food & Drug Administration (FDA). The current recommendations are for sotalol 75-150mg to be administered intravenously over 5hours. This rate of administration does not reflect the majority of the research that has been performed with regards to intravenous sotalol. Also, the safety of intravenous bolus dosing of 100mg over 1 and 5minutes has previously been demonstrated. The antiarrhythmic action of sotalol depends on its ability to prolong refractoriness in the nodal and extra nodal tissue. Hence, by giving a lower dose over a long duration, patients may not necessarily benefit from its anti-arrhythmic potential. The purpose of this article is to review the research that has been conducted with regards to dosage and safety of intravenous sotalol, its electrophysiological effects and finally the spectrum of arrhythmias in which it has been used to date.

Comparison of the effectiveness of intravenous diltiazem and metoprolol in the management of rapid ventricular rate in atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of intravenous (IV) diltiazem and metoprolol in the management of rapid ventricular rate in atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

This prospective, randomised study was conducted in the Emergency Department of the Uludag University Medical Faculty Hospital, Bursa, Turkey. Forty AF patients with a ventricular rate > or = 120/minute and systolic blood pressure > or = 95 mm Hg were included and randomised to receive IV diltiazem 0.25 mg/kg (maximum 25 mg) or metoprolol 0.15 mg/kg (maximum 10 mg) over 2 minutes. Blood pressures and heart rate were measured at 2, 5, 10, 15, and 20 minutes. Successful treatment was defined as fall in ventricular rate to below 100/minute or decrease in ventricular rate by 20% or return to sinus rhythm.

RESULTS

Between January 2000 and July 2002, 40 patients (18 men, 22 women) met the inclusion criteria. Of these 20 (8 men, 12 women; mean age 60.2 years, range 31-82) received diltiazem and 20 (10 men, 10 women; mean age 64.0 years, range 31-82) received metoprolol. The success rate at 20 minutes for diltiazem and metoprolol was 90% (n = 18) and 80% (n = 16), respectively. The success rate at 2 minutes was higher in the diltiazem group. The percentage decrease in ventricular rate was higher in the diltiazem group at each time interval. None of the patients had hypotension.

CONCLUSION

Both diltiazem and metoprolol were safe and effective for the management of rapid ventricular rate in AF. However, the rate control effect began earlier and the percentage decrease in ventricular rate was higher with diltiazem than with metoprolol.

Comparison of the effectiveness of intravenous diltiazem and metoprolol in the management of rapid ventricular rate in atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of intravenous (IV) diltiazem and metoprolol in the management of rapid ventricular rate in atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

This prospective, randomised study was conducted in the Emergency Department of the Uludag University Medical Faculty Hospital, Bursa, Turkey. Forty AF patients with a ventricular rate > or = 120/minute and systolic blood pressure > or = 95 mm Hg were included and randomised to receive IV diltiazem 0.25 mg/kg (maximum 25 mg) or metoprolol 0.15 mg/kg (maximum 10 mg) over 2 minutes. Blood pressures and heart rate were measured at 2, 5, 10, 15, and 20 minutes. Successful treatment was defined as fall in ventricular rate to below 100/minute or decrease in ventricular rate by 20% or return to sinus rhythm.

RESULTS

Between January 2000 and July 2002, 40 patients (18 men, 22 women) met the inclusion criteria. Of these 20 (8 men, 12 women; mean age 60.2 years, range 31-82) received diltiazem and 20 (10 men, 10 women; mean age 64.0 years, range 31-82) received metoprolol. The success rate at 20 minutes for diltiazem and metoprolol was 90% (n = 18) and 80% (n = 16), respectively. The success rate at 2 minutes was higher in the diltiazem group. The percentage decrease in ventricular rate was higher in the diltiazem group at each time interval. None of the patients had hypotension.

CONCLUSION

Both diltiazem and metoprolol were safe and effective for the management of rapid ventricular rate in AF. However, the rate control effect began earlier and the percentage decrease in ventricular rate was higher with diltiazem than with metoprolol.

QT PRODACT: Inter-facility Variability in Electrocardiographic and Hemodynamic Parameters in Conscious Dogs and Monkeys

In safety pharmacology studies, the effect of a test compound on the electrocardiogram is routinely examined by using conscious dogs. However, the results may be widely variable. The monkey, on the other hand, has scarcely been used for such studies; and as yet, there have not been reported studies on monkeys conducted at several facilities with a standard protocol. In the present study, we examined inter-facility variabilities in electrocardiographic and hemodynamic parameters as described below. We analyzed the data from 8 facilities (9 test groups) on dogs and 5 facilities (7 test groups) on monkeys. This data was obtained from the studies employing the following standard protocol: dl-Sotalol or a vehicle (0.5 w/v% methylcellulose solution) was given to animals; and the PR interval, QRS duration, QT interval, heart rate, and mean blood pressure were determined time-sequentially before and after administration of the vehicle or dl-sotalol in each test group. dl-Sotalol produced a prolongation of the maximum mean QTcF interval in conscious dogs and QTcB interval in conscious monkeys by more than 10% in every test group. No difference in the corrected QT interval among the test groups was observed in dogs, but a difference was observed in monkeys.

Enantioselective liquid chromatographic-electrospray mass spectrometric assay of β-adrenergic blockers: application to a pharmacokinetic study of sotalol in human plasma

An enantioselective high performance liquid chromatographic-electrospray ionization mass spectrometric (HPLC-ESI-MS) method for the direct determination of several beta-adrenergic blockers was developed and validated. The method is based on the direct separation of the enantiomers of drugs on a laboratory-made chiral stationary phase (CSP) containing covalently bonded teicoplanin (TE) as chiral selector. Detection of the effluent was performed by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry, run in the selected-ion recording (SIR) mode. The method was applied to the pharmacokinetic monitoring of sotalol (STL) in the plasma of five young healthy volunteers, dosed with racemic drug. The limits of quantitation (LOQ) reached 4 ng/ml for both sotalol enantiomers. Such a method, fully validated, offers a novel, fast and very efficient tool for the direct determination of sotalol enantiomers in human plasma, and can be generally applied to the beta-adrenergic blockers stereoselective pharmacokinetics.

Meta-analysis of the Risk of Torsades de Pointes in patients treated with intravenous racemic sotalol

OBJECTIVE

Intravenous (IV) racemic sotalol is useful for the treatment of multiple tachydysrhythmias. The authors hypothesized that the risk of torsades de pointes (TdP) in patients treated with a single IV infusion of sotalol is lower than the 2-4% risk associated with chronic oral sotalol therapy.

METHODS

A MEDLINE search under the subject heading "sotalol" was made of all publications involving humans written in English or German from 1966 to October 1, 2000. A meta-analysis of all original reports including patients who were given a single infusion of at least 1.5 mg/kg or 100 mg of IV sotalol over 30 minutes or less was performed. Potential variables predictive of TdP were assessed. The primary outcome was the observation of TdP associated with IV sotalol infusion. Secondary measurements included hypotension, bradycardia, and worsening of congestive heart failure. All excluded studies and case reports were also examined for evidence of TdP associated with IV sotalol treatment.

RESULTS

The search included 1,005 publications. There were 37 reports in which 962 patients received IV sotalol and met the inclusion criteria. There was one report of self-terminating TdP lasting 10 seconds among the 962 patients included in the study. There was no report of TdP associated with only IV racemic sotalol administration in any of the excluded studies. If it is assumed that the risk of TdP is homogeneous in the population of patients treated with IV sotalol, then based on the 962 included patients, the rate of TdP is 0.1% (95% CI = 0.003% to 0.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall risk of TdP in patients treated with a single infusion of IV sotalol is low compared with that in patients given chronic oral sotalol therapy.

Current role of pharmacologic therapy for patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia

Intravenous antiarrhythmic drugs will continue to have an important role in the acute management of SVT. Long-term antiarrhythmic drug therapy is often effective in preventing or reducing frequency and severity of arrhythmic episodes. The cost, adverse effects, and inconvenience of long-term drug therapy will result in the increasing use of curative ablation for most individuals with problematic SVT.

A comparison of transvenous atrial defibrillation of acute and chronic atrial fibrillation and the effect of intravenous sotalol on human atrial defibrillation threshold

The comparative efficacy and safety of transvenous defibrillation for acute and chronic AF and the effect of antiarrhythmic agents on this therapy have not been evaluated. Transvenous atrial defibrillation was performed in 25 patients with chronic AF and 13 patients with acute AF by delivering R wave synchronized, biphasic shocks between the right atrium and coronary sinus. The lowest energy and voltage resulting in successful defibrillation were considered to be atrial defibrillation threshold (ADFT). Intravenous sotalol (1.5 mg/kg) was then given over 15 minutes and ADFT was determined again. The mean ADFT was 1.5 J and 3.6 J for acute and chronic AF, respectively, and the threshold was highly reproducible. Sotalol reduced ADFT in patients with acute AF while the reduction in chronic AF group was not significant. There was no significant increase in creatinine kinase nor reduction in blood pressure, but prolonged pause after successful defibrillation required ventricular supporting pacing. We conclude that transvenous atrial defibrillation is a safe and effective means for defibrillating both acute and chronic AF. ADFT was lower in acute AF than in chronic AF. ADFT was highly reproducible during repeated defibrillation. Sotalol reduced ADFT in acute AF and to a lesser extent in chronic AF, and increased the defibrillation success rate. Ventricular pacing will often be required because of prolonged pause after successful defibrillation.

Multicenter comparative study of the efficacy and safety of sotalol in the prophylactic treatment of patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachyarrhythmias

We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controled, parallel-group comparison study of the efficacy and safety of sotalol in the prophylaxis of paroxysmal supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (PSVTs) (including paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and paroxysmal reentrant SVTs). The frequency of PSVT episodes while not receiving drug therapy was monitored during a baseline phase, the length of which depended on the frequency of PSVT events. In the double-blind phase, the duration of which depended on the baseline frequency of episodes of PSVT, patients received placebo, sotalol 80 mg twice daily, or sotalol 160 mg twice daily. PSVT events were documented by electrocardiogram and diary. The time to recurrence of PSVT was significantly less compared with placebo when receiving sotalol 80 mg (p = 0.018) and sotalol 160 mg (p = 0.0009). On subanalysis, sotalol was shown to be effective in the prophylaxis of both paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and paroxysmal reentrant arrhythmias. Sotalol was well tolerated, with no deaths, proarrhythmia, or cardiac failure. Because of adverse effects, drug therapy was discontinued in six patients.

Enantioselective determination of sotalol enantiomers in biological fluids using high-performance liquid chromatography

A simple and sensitive high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method for the determination of (+)-(S)-sotalol and (-)-(R)-sotalol in biological fluids was established. Following extraction with isopropyl alcohol from biological samples on a Sep-Pak C18 cartridge, the eluent was derivatized with 2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-beta-D-glucopyranosyl isothiocyanate (GITC). The diastereoisomeric derivates were resolved by HPLC with UV detection at 225 nm. Calibration was linear from 0.022 to 4.41 micrograms/ml in human plasma and from 0.22 to 88.2 micrograms/ml in human urine for both (+)-(S)- and (-)-(R)-sotalol. The lower limit of determination was 0.022 microgram/ml for plasma and 0.22 microgram/ml for urine. The within-day and day-to-day coefficients of variation were less than 7.5% for each enantiomer at 0.09 and 1.8 microgram/ml in plasma and at 0.44 and 4.4 micrograms/ml in urine. The method is also applicable to other biological specimens such as rat, mouse and rabbit plasma.

Sotalol: a new beta-adrenergic blocker for ventricular arrhythmias

Sotalol is a water-soluble, nonselective, beta-adrenergic blocker that was recently approved in oral form in the United States for the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias that are judged to be life-threatening. As a beta-blocker, sotalol is unique in having additional class-III antiarrhythmic activity. It is still not resolved whether sotalol is more effective than other beta-blockers in managing arrhythmias, but there are suggestions that it might possess greater antiarrhythmic and life-protecting activities than other types of antiarrhythmic drugs. The drug is well tolerated, but, because of its electrophysiologic activity, there is a small risk of proarrhythmia, specifically the development of polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and torsade de pointes.

Intravenous sotalol for the termination of supraventricular tachycardia and atrial fibrillation and flutter: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Sotalol Multicenter Study Group

Sotalol is an antiarrhythmic agent with combined beta-blocking and class III antiarrhythmic properties. This study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of sotalol in terminating supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), atrial fibrillation (AFib), and atrial flutter (AFl). Ninety-three patients with spontaneous or induced SVT (n = 45) or AF (AFib or AFl; n = 48) with a ventricular rate of > or = 120 beats/min were studied. In the first phase, the double-blind phase, patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo or intravenous (i.v.) sotalol, 1.0 or 1.5 mg/kg. If SVT or AF did not convert to sinus rhythm or if the ventricular rate did not slow to < 100 beats/min within 30 minutes, patients then entered the second phase, the open-label phase, which also lasted 30 minutes, and were given 1.5 mg/kg iv sotalol. In the SVT group, during the double-blind phase conversion to sinus rhythm occurred in 2 (14%) of 14 of patients who received placebo, 10 (67%) of 15 who received sotalol, 1.0 mg/kg (p < 0.05 vs placebo), and 10 (67%) of 15 who received 1.5 mg/kg sotalol (p < 0.05 vs placebo); during the open-label phase, 1.5 mg/kg i.v. sotalol converted 7 (41%) of 17 of patients. In the AF group, during the double-blind phase conversion to sinus rhythm occurred in 2 (14%) of 14 of patients who received placebo, 2 (11%) of 18 who received 1.0 mg/kg sotalol (p not significant [NS] vs placebo), and 2 (13%) of 16 who received 1.5 mg/kg sotalol (p = NS vs placebo); in these groups, a > 20% reduction of ventricular rate without conversion to sinus rhythm occurred in 0 (0%) of 14, 13 (72%) of 18 (p < 0.05 vs placebo), and 12 (75%) of 16 of patients (p < 0.05 vs placebo), respectively; during the open-label phase, 1.5 mg/kg i.v. sotalol converted 7 (30%) of 23 of patients. The most common adverse events were hypotension and dyspnea. During the double-blind phase they occurred in 10% of patients who received placebo, 9% of those who received 1.0 mg/kg i.v. sotalol (p = NS vs placebo), and 10% of those who received 1.5 mg/kg i.v. sotalol (p = NS vs placebo). Most of these events were mild to moderate, but all were transient and clinically manageable.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Sotalol: from "just another beta blocker" to "the prototype of class III antidysrhythmic compound"

Sotalol is a beta-blocking drug devoid of membrane stabilizing properties, as well as intrinsic sympathomimetic actions, or cardioselectivity. In addition, sotalol prolongs atrial and ventricular repolarization (Class III antiarrhythmic activity). It appears to have less myocardial depressant effect than other beta-blocking agents. Given orally, bioavailability of the drug reaches 100%. Sotalol's plasma half-life is 15 hours (range 7-18) and is dependent only on renal function. In clinical practice, it has been found effective in the suppression of nearly all supraventricular and ventricular dysrhythmias except those related to prolonged ventricular repolarization. Most common adverse effects are dyspnea, bradycardia, and fatigue, which results in drug termination in 16% of the cases. Torsades de pointes usually associated with bradycardia and drug induced QTc prolongation has been reported in 1.9%-3.5% of the patients receiving sotalol. This complication may be reduced by limiting the dose (< 640 mg/day) especially in patients with impaired renal function. In addition hypokalemia must be avoided. To sum up, the combination of Class II and Class III effects may carry additional benefits. However, further studies are required to test such hypotheses.

Sotalol

Sotalol is a novel antiarrhythmic agent combining beta-adrenergic-antagonist actions with the ability to increase cardiac repolarization and refractoriness. The drug's electrophysiologic and clinical profile is different from that of conventional beta-receptor antagonists. As compared with other antiarrhythmic agents, sotalol prevents recurrences of arrhythmia in a higher proportion of patients, particularly among those presenting with ventricular tachycardia and aborted sudden cardiac death. The net hemodynamic effect of sotalol is the result of a balance between the depressant effects due to beta-receptor blockade and an action that tends to increase contractility. Although initially marketed in the United States for treatment of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, sotalol also has demonstrated efficacy in many patients with supraventricular arrhythmias. As with all drugs that prolong the QT interval, the syndrome of torsade de pointes is a serious potential adverse effect.

Sotalol controlled-release systems for arrhythmias: in vitro characterization, in vivo drug disposition, and electrophysiologic effects

An array of controlled-release formulations of sotalol were investigated for epicardial drug delivery in short-term and chronic long-term treatment models with dogs. A nondegradable matrix formulation of sotalol made with polyurethane was studied by use of short-term treatment model with dogs, and the electrophysiologic effects were compared with those resulting from an intravenous dose of 2 mg/kg of body weight. Epicardial sotalol-polyurethane matrices were also used in 7-day canine implant studies. A sotalol-silicone rubber matrix was used in 60-day epicardial canine implant studies. A biodegradable poly(dl-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) microsphere formulation of sotalol was also studied as a pericardial injection in another series involving 30-day dog experiments. The short-term treatment electrophysiologic effects observed with the epicardial (left ventricular) implantation of a sotalol-polyurethane matrix formulation were comparable to those observed with intravenous sotalol. However, the total dose delivered by the matrix over a 2-h experimental period was 25 times smaller than the intravenous dose (0.077 versus 2 mg/kg). Furthermore, coronary venous sotalol levels after sotalol-polyurethane matrix implantation were in the therapeutic range (1812.4 +/- 415.1 ng/mL), whereas simultaneous peripheral venous levels were more than 1 order of magnitude lower (149.8 +/- 14.1 ng/mL). An intravenous bolus administration of sotalol (2 mg/kg) resulted in coronary venous levels (1537.1 +/- 44.6 ng/mL) that were very close to simultaneous peripheral venous levels (1428.6 +/- 63.9 ng/mL).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Sotalol: a breakthrough antiarrhythmic?

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetic, dosing, adverse effects, and therapeutic uses of sotalol.

DATA IDENTIFICATION

Articles were identified with an English-language literature computer search via Knowledge Finder, using the term sotalol, and with an extensive search of bibliographies of identified articles.

STUDY SELECTION

Relevant or representative animal studies, human trials, and case reports were selected for evaluation.

DATA EXTRACTION

The literature was assessed for quality, methodology, and outcome information.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Sotalol is a racemic compound with Class II (beta-blocking properties) and Class III (prolonged action potential) antiarrhythmic activity. It has been suggested that the plasma concentration associated with QTc prolongation (a measure of the Class III action) is much greater than that associated with beta-blockade. Therefore, sotalol is categorized as a Class III antiarrhythmic agent. The 1-isomer is responsible for the beta-blocking activity, whereas both isomers have Class III properties. After oral dosing in fasting patients with normal renal function, sotalol is > 90 percent absorbed, achieves peak serum concentrations in 2-4 h, is excreted unchanged 80-90 percent in the urine, has a volume of distribution of 1-2 L/kg, and has an elimination half-life of about 12 h. Sotalol is effective in patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias that have been refractory to other conventional antiarrhythmic drugs. In general, sotalol appears to be well tolerated, with many of its adverse effects caused by beta-blocking activity. As with other antiarrhythmic agents, the possibility of proarrhythmia (frequently torsade de pointes) exists.

CONCLUSIONS

Racemic sotalol is an effective Class III antiarrhythmic agent approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of documented life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. Investigations continue with racemic sotalol in the management of supraventricular arrhythmias. Trials with the d-isomer are also ongoing.

Sotalol. An updated review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in cardiac arrhythmias

Sotalol is a nonselective beta-adrenoceptor antagonist which prolongs cardiac repolarisation independently of its antiadrenergic action (class III antiarrhythmic properties). The antiarrhythmic action of sotalol appears to arise predominantly from its class III properties, and the drug exhibits a broader antiarrhythmic profile than the conventional beta-blockers. Sotalol is effective in controlling paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias and the ventricular response to atrial fibrillation/flutter in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, in maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation/flutter, and in preventing initiation of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias following coronary artery bypass surgery. Sotalol shows promise in the control of nonmalignant and life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, particularly those associated with ischaemic heart disease. It is effective in suppressing complex forms of ventricular ectopy, displaying superior antiectopic activity to propranolol and metoprolol. The acute efficacy of sotalol in preventing reinduction of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias and suppressing spontaneous episodes of these arrhythmias on Holter monitoring is translated into long term prophylactic efficacy against arrhythmia recurrence in approximately 55 to 85% of patients with refractory life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. In addition, sotalol offers the advantage over the class I agents of reducing cardiac and all-cause mortality in the high risk population with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. The adverse effects of sotalol are primarily related to its beta-blocking activity and its class III property of prolonging cardiac repolarisation. Sotalol is devoid of overt cardiodepressant activity in patients with mild or moderate left ventricular dysfunction. The overall arrhythmogenic potential is moderately low, but torsade de pointes may develop in conjunction with excessive prolongation of the QT interval due to bradycardia, hypokalaemia or high plasma concentrations of the drug. In summary, sotalol displays a broad spectrum of antiarrhythmic activity, is haemodynamically well tolerated, and confers a relatively low proarrhythmic risk. It is likely to prove particularly appropriate in the treatment and prophylaxis of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Electrophysiologic basis for the antiarrhythmic actions of sotalol and comparison with other agents

Although synthesized as a nonselective beta-adrenergic blocking compound, sotalol has emerged as the prototype of the so-called class III antiarrhythmic compounds. It delays cardiac repolarization by inhibiting the delayed rectifier potassium current, having a lesser effect on the inward rectifying potassium current with little or no effect on the inward calcium or sodium currents. This property of prolonging repolarization with an accompanying increase in the effective refractory period is not due to blockade of the beta-adrenergic receptors. The major electrophysiologic profile of sotalol constitutes the summed effects of beta blockade and prolonged repolarization. Sotalol exerts a potent antifibrillatory action modulated by its antiadrenergic effects. It suppresses premature ventricular contractions and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia while preventing inducible ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation in patients with advanced structural heart disease. The compound is therefore likely to exert a broad spectrum of antiarrhythmic actions in ventricular arrhythmias.

Oral flecainide, sotalol, and verapamil for the termination of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia

The ability to terminate supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) acutely with an oral dose of flecainide (2.5-3.3 mg/kg), sotalol (2.0-2.9 mg/kg), and verapamil (3.3-3.7 mg/kg) was investigated in an observational study of six patients with SVT normally controlled by an antitachycardia pacemaker. The pacemaker was programmed to induce SVT and the stability of SVT was observed for 90 minutes as a baseline. Subsequent studies involved testing of the three antiarrhythmic drugs on separate occasions, given in random order as crushed tablets in orange juice during pacemaker induced SVT, with plasma drug levels collected every 15 minutes for 90 minutes post drug ingestion. Sotalol produced drug induced slowing of SVT in all six patients, with termination of SVT in three patients by 60-65 minutes, with maximum plasma levels of 0.76-2.09 micrograms/mL achieved by 90 minutes. Flecainide produced maximum plasma levels of 83-745 ng/mL, 60-90 minutes post ingestion, and slowed SVT in three patients. SVT was terminated in three patients after 45-85 minutes, but no effect on SVT was seen in two patients who had inadequate plasma levels (< or = 166 ng/mL) from doses < 3 mg/kg. Verapamil produced maximum plasma levels of 0 (undetectable) to 388 ng/mL, 45-90 minutes post ingestion, and slowed SVT in three patients, but only one of these patients reverted to sinus rhythm (at 40 min). No effect on SVT was seen in three patients due to undetectable plasma levels. We concluded that sotalol (> or = 2 mg/kg) and flecainide (> or = 3 mg/kg) appeared to be suitable oral drugs for termination of SVT.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Sotalol: a novel beta-blocker with class III anti-arrhythmic activity

Initially synthesized in 1960, sotalol is a novel beta-adrenoreceptor blocking agent that also possesses class III anti-arrhythmic properties. The drug's ability to lengthen repolarization and prolong effective refractory periods in all cardiac tissues in addition to its beta-blocking effects make sotalol an attractive agent for use in a variety of supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias.

Sotalol

Sotalol causes noncardioselective beta-adrenergic antagonism and prolongation of repolarization of cardiac tissues (Class III electrophysiologic action). This dual pharmacologic profile confers unprecedented antiarrhythmic properties to the drug. Sotalol is highly bioavailable when administered orally in the fasting state and is mostly cleared unchanged in the urine with an apparent half-life of elimination of 15 to 17 hours. It has been found effective in the suppression of nearly all cardiac arrhythmias, with the exception of those precipitated by prolongation of ventricular repolarization. Its safety and efficacy relative to other antiarrhythmic drugs need to be examined more fully in randomized controlled trials of unselected patients. The adverse effects potentially associated with the use of sotalol are those commonly observed with beta-adrenergic blockade, as well as those resulting from excessive prolongation of the QT interval. The occurrence of torsade de pointes during treatment with sotalol may be minimized by limiting doses to no more than 640 mg/day and by strictly avoiding the development of hypokalemia.

The advantage of d-sotalol over dl-sotalol in a patient with ventricular arrhythmias and comorbid bronchospasm

The anti-arrhythmic agent sotalol, a racemic mixture of d- and l-isomers, has inherent beta-adrenoceptor blocking activity due to the l-isomer form. For patients with contraindications to beta-adrenoreceptor blockade, dl-sotalol has potentially untoward effects that may limit its usefulness. The case of a man with resistant life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias who responded favorably to dl-sotalol, but developed worsening of underlying bronchospastic lung disease, is presented. A change in therapy to the d-isomer form of sotalol, d-sotalol, was effective in suppressing his ventricular arrhythmias without further aggravation of bronchospasm.

High-performance liquid chromatographic determination of sotalol in plasma. I. Application to the disposition of sotalol enantiomers in humans

Two high-performance liquid chromatographic analytical methods have been developed for the measurement of dl-sotalol or d-sotalol and l-sotalol in plasma, using dl-atenolol as internal standard. Quantitation of dl-sotalol was carried out, following solid-phase extraction, on a 5-microns C18 reversed-phase column, with a mobile phase containing acetonitrile, ion-pairing reagent and distilled water, using ultraviolet detection at 235 nm. Quantitation of d-sotalol and l-sotalol was based on derivatisation with the chiral agent S-(-)-alpha-methylbenzyl isocyanate, followed by chromatographic separation on a 3-microns C18 reversed-phase column, with a mobile phase containing methanol, glacial acetic acid and distilled water, with fluorimetric detection at 220 nm excitation and 300 nm emission. A preliminary application of the latter method suggests that the disposition of sotalol in humans is not enantioselective.

Effectiveness of oral sotalol for treatment of pediatric arrhythmias

Sotalol is a beta blocker with class III activity. Few investigators have reported its use in pediatric patients. From August 1985 to May 1990, 66 patients (mean age 8.7 years; range 9 days to 24 years), including 14 infants aged less than 3 months, were treated with oral sotalol alone (n = 46) or in association with digoxin (n = 20). Supraventricular reentrant tachycardia was present in 38 patients (20 with documented preexcitation), atrial flutter in 10 and atrial ectopic tachycardia in 7. Three patients had other types of supraventricular tachycardia. Tachycardia was of ventricular origin in 6 patients and both of supraventricular and ventricular origin in the remaining 2. Mean dose of oral sotalol was 135 mg/m2/day given in 2 doses. Congenital heart disease was present in 28 patients, 14 with previous cardiac surgery, mostly at the atrial level. Prior treatment with 1 or more antiarrhythmic agent had been unsuccessful in 83% of patients. Mean duration of treatment was 13.3 months (range 2 months to 5 years). Overall, treatment was successful in 79% of cases. Highest rate of success was observed in patients with supraventricular reentrant tachycardia with or without preexcitation (89%) and in those with atrial ectopic tachycardia (85.5%). Atrial flutter could be controlled in 60% of cases. Sotalol seemed less effective in ventricular tachycardia with a complete control of the arrhythmia being achieved in only 17%; however, it decreased the number of runs of ventricular tachycardia and the number of ventricular premature complexes in 50% of patients. There were no adverse effects in 89% of patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Efficacy of intravenous sotalol for suppressing inducibility of supraventricular tachycardias at rest and during isometric exercise

The efficacy of intravenous sotalol (1 mg/kg) for suppressing inducibility of supraventricular tachycardias (SVT) with different electrophysiologic mechanisms was studied in 30 consecutive patients referred for an electrophysiologic study because of paroxysmal SVT. Orthodromic SVT using accessory atrioventricular (AV) connection was inducible in 14 patients, AV nodal reentrant SVT in 8, and intraatrial SVT in 8 before administration of sotalol, Isometric handgrip exercise facilitated the inducibility of SVT in 8 patients who were noninducible at rest. After intravenous sotalol, 7 of 14 patients (50%) with orthodromic SVT, 8 of 8 (100%) with AV nodal reentrant SVT, and 8 of 8 (100%) with intraatrial reentrant SVT became noninducible into sustained SVT, Isometric exercise facilitated the inducibility of only 3 nonsustained SVT runs after sotalol infusion, and exercise did not reverse the prolongation of refractory periods of the atrium, AV node, accessory pathway and ventricle caused by sotalol. During a mean follow-up period of 18 +/- 7 months, none of the 14 patients who remained noninducible into sustained SVT during the stress test after intravenous sotalol and tolerated long-term oral sotalol therapy had recurrence of symptomatic SVT. Thus, sotalol is efficacious for suppressing SVT with AV nodal or intraatrial reentrant mechanism, but less efficacious in patients with accessory AV pathway. The beta-blocking and cellular antiarrhythmic effects of sotalol are not significantly reversed by exercise.

Efficacy and safety of intravenous sotalol for termination of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. The Sotalol Versus Placebo Multicenter Study Group

A double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover, multicenter study was conducted to study the efficacy and safety of a single intravenous dose of sotalol (1.5 mg/kg over 10 minutes) in achieving normal sinus rhythm in paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) lasting greater than or equal to 15 minutes. Patients were randomized to either sotalol or placebo as initial treatment, and if the SVT was not terminated a crossover was performed after 20 minutes. A total of 43 patients were enrolled, 38 of whom with spontaneous (n = 14) or induced (n = 24) SVT were analyzed for sotalol efficacy. Most patients (n = 27) had atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia, and an important subgroup (n = 11) had circus movement tachycardia, using an accessory pathway for retrograde conduction. The number of patients converting to sinus rhythm as a result of the initial treatment was significantly higher in the sotalol group than in the placebo group, for spontaneous (p less than 0.005) as well as for induced tachycardia (p less than 0.001). Sinus rhythm was achieved within 30 minutes in 83% of all patients who received sotalol as the first drug, compared with 16% of the patients first receiving placebo (p less than 0.0001). For sotalol safety analysis, 42 patients were included. A total of 37 patients received sotalol, 19 as the first treatment, and 18 as the second treatment, while 25 patients received placebo. A total of 15 possible adverse effects were reported, occurring in 10 patients with sotalol versus 4 with placebo. The only severe side effect (hypotension) necessitating termination of drug administration occurred with placebo. No proarrhythmic effects were observed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Simplified procedure for the determination of sotalol in plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography

A simple, specific and rapid reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) procedure for sotalol determination is described requiring small plasma volumes. The high recovery of sotalol from plasma and the high precision of measurement obviate the need for an internal standard. Plasma samples (300 microliters) were deproteinised with 50 microliters of 70% (w/w) perchloric acid in disposable glass tubes. After vortex-mixing and centrifugation, 30 microliters of 4 M K2HPO4 were added followed by gentle shaking. A 20-microliters aliquot was then injected (by autosampler) for HPLC analysis. Chromatography was performed on a glass-lined 250 mm x 4 mm 5-micron C18 steel column. The mobile phase was 6% (v/v) acetonitrile in 0.08 M KH2PO4 buffer (pH 4.6). The flow-rate was 0.8 ml/min. Detection was by fluorescence with excitation and emission wavelengths at 235 and 310 nm, respectively. The retention time for sotalol was 7.1 min. Calibration was linear from 0.16 to 10 micrograms/ml in plasma (r greater than 0.999 for detector response to sotalol). The minimum concentration for quantitation was 0.08 micrograms/ml [within assay coefficient of variation (C.V.) less than 5%]. Recovery was near quantitative (greater than 98%) and replicate (intra-assay precision was less than 5% C.V.). Analysis of samples (n = 10) at concentrations of 0.42 and 4.2 micrograms/ml gave mean values of 0.44 and 4.3 micrograms/ml, respectively. The inter-assay C.V. values were 4.5 and 2.2%, respectively. Other clinically used antiarrhythmic drugs did not interfere. This assay can be performed using other commercial C18 analytical columns by suitable adjustment of mobile phase flow-rate and acetonitrile composition.

Sotalol versus class I and II antiarrhythmic agents

In two separate, double-blind, multicenter antiarrhythmic studies, sotalol was compared with propranolol or quinidine using placebo for baseline and/or washout periods. The comparison with quinidine was a crossover study. To be enrolled in these studies, patients were required to have a premature ventricular contraction (PVC) rate of at least 30/hr on a baseline 24-hour ambulatory ECG. At doses calculated to produce equivalent degrees of beta blockade, sotalol was more effective than propranolol in reducing the frequency of PVCs, and the two drugs produced similar reductions in ventricular tachycardia (VT) events. The side effects for sotalol and propranolol were mainly due to beta blockade, and the incidence of side effects with the two drugs was similar. Sotalol was comparable with quinidine in reducing PVCs and VT events. The side effects on sotalol were primarily related to beta-adrenergic blockade, while those on quinidine were predominantly gastrointestinal or neurologic in nature.

Efficacy of sotalol in controlling reentrant supraventricular tachycardias

Sotalol is unique among beta-blocking agents having significant Class III antiarrhythmic action. In a series of 22 patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome and seven patients with atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) resistant to multiple drugs, sotalol was studied by acute electrophysiologic means, as well as by long-term clinical follow-up ranging from 1 to 47 months. Sustained reciprocating tachycardia was rendered noninducible in 13 of 18 patients with WPW and in 5 of 6 with AVNRT. Long-term control of symptomatic tachycardia was achieved in 77% of patients with WPW and in 57% of patients with resistant AVNRT. Side effects were those associated with beta blockade. Two patients developed ventricular irritability associated with excessive QT prolongation.

Sotalol for paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias

Used in adequate dosages, sotalol is efficacious in the conversion of acute supraventricular arrhythmias, an effect that is predictable on the basis of the drug's known electropharmacologic actions. Electrophysiologic studies have shown that both oral and intravenous sotalol are effective in preventing the induction of sustained arrhythmias and that the success of acute suppression is indicative of subsequent clinical control. Interim results of a recent trial of prophylaxis against recurrence of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia are reported, demonstrating a high efficacy with an acceptably low profile of adverse effects.

Historical development of the concept of controlling cardiac arrhythmias by lengthening repolarization: particular reference to sotalol

Although numerous pathophysiologic states, such as hypocalcemia and hypothyroidism, lengthen repolarization and are associated with a reduced incidence of cardiac fibrillation, the concept of the pharmacologic control of rhythm disorders by prolonging the action potential duration is relatively new. There is now a great deal of interest in the relative merits and applicability of delaying conduction or prolonging refractoriness as ways to prevent arrhythmias. Prolonging the action potential duration in cardiac tissues lengthens the refractory period without affecting conduction, prolongs the cycle length of the tachycardia, and prevents it from deteriorating into fibrillation. Lengthening the action potential duration is also associated with a positive inotropic effect demonstrated most readily in isolated cardiac tissues, an important feature in antiarrhythmic agents intended for use in life-threatening tachyarrhythmias in patients with reduced ventricular function. This array of properties was first recognized in the beta blocker sotalol and formed the basis for a discrete class of antiarrhythmic mechanism--the so-called class III electrophysiologic effect. Such a series of actions was also recognized early in the case of amiodarone, which has a much more complex pharmacologic profile. Clinical studies with sotalol and amiodarone have done much to establish the clinical use of prolonging the action potential duration in controlling a broad spectrum of cardiac arrhythmias. Both amiodarone and sotalol prolong the action potential duration and attenuate adrenergic stimulation, but they do so by fundamentally different mechanisms. The electrophysiologic properties of sotalol represent the combined effects of beta blockade and lengthening the action potential duration.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Concentration/response relations for the multiple antiarrhythmic actions of sotalol

Sotalol, one of the first beta-receptor antagonists synthesized, is a promising investigational agent with remarkable efficacy for treatment of patients with ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias. Unlike other beta blockers, sotalol also possesses class III antiarrhythmic action, evidenced by prolongation of the myocardial action potential duration. This additional action probably accounts for the greater antiarrhythmic efficacy of sotalol compared with other beta blockers. Sotalol's class III antiarrhythmic action becomes apparent at concentrations higher than those necessary for significant beta-receptor antagonism, both in vitro and in human subjects. In a study correlating dosage and antiarrhythmic response with prolongation of rate-corrected QT (QTc) (a measure of class III action) and the degree of beta-receptor blockade (assessed by the reduction of the maximal exercise-induced heart rate), 11 of 17 patients had an antiarrhythmic response. Eight of these 11 responders had been unresponsive to conventional beta-receptor antagonists. The plasma concentration associated with significant QTc prolongation (2.55 micrograms/ml) was found to be much greater than that associated with 50% reduction in maximal slowing of heart rate (0.8 micrograms/ml). As with other beta-receptor antagonists, the activities of sotalol's 2 stereoisomers differ, with the I-isomer having far more beta-blocking activity. However, both isomers have equal class III antiarrhythmic activity. When increasing doses of the d-isomer of sotalol (50 to 400 mg every 12 hours) were evaluated in patients with chronic ventricular arrhythmias, arrhythmia frequency was suppressed greater than 80% in 3 patients and 50% in 1 patient.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effects of (+)- and (+/-)-sotalol on repolarizing outward currents and pacemaker current in sheep cardiac Purkinje fibres

This study was aimed to differentiate the action of (+)- and (+/-)-sotalol (10-1000 mumol/l) on membrane currents which are active during the repolarization of cardiac action potentials. Effects where studied in shortened sheep cardiac Purkinje fibres with the two-microelectrode voltage-clamp technique. Action potentials were activated at a frequency of 0.25 Hz and membrane currents at 0.03 Hz or 0.05 Hz in most experiments. Out of the currents investigated the transient outward current (ito) reacted most sensitively to (+)- and (+/-)-sotalol. Ito-amplitude was decreased on the average to 77% of reference at 10 mumol/l and to 53% at 1000 mumol/l (+)- or (+/-)-sotalol. The maximally available ito-current was decreased but the voltage-dependent control of inactivation was left nearly unchanged. The initial inwardly rectifying current (iK1), which propels the last repolarization phase of the action potential and controls resting potential to a large extent was reduced on the average to 93% of reference at 10 mumol/l and to 62% at 1000 mumol/l (+)- or (+/-)-sotalol. Time-dependent (delayed) outward current (iK) was on the average not affected by (+)- or (+/-)-sotalol up to 100 mumol/l and was decreased to 84% of reference current under the influence of 1000 mumol/l. An initial outward current, which is activated at positive membrane potentials (iinst) was not clearly affected by (+)- or (+/-)-sotalol at concentrations up to 1000 mumol/l. Pacemaker current (if) was not influenced by the drugs up to 100 mumol/l.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Efficacy, safety, and tolerance of d-sotalol in patients with refractory supraventricular tachyarrhythmias

The efficacy, safety, and electrophysiologic effects of intravenous and oral d-sotalol, an investigational class III antiarrhythmic agent, are not yet well characterized. We evaluated the electrophysiologic, antiarrhythmic, and hemodynamic effects of d-sotalol infusion (1.5 to 2.75 mg/kg) and of chronic oral therapy (200 to 400 mg bid) in 10 patients with chronic, paroxysmal supraventricular tachyarrhythmias refractory to 5 +/- 2 standard agents. Four patients had paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT), four had paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, two had atrial flutter, and one had nonparoxysmal reciprocating junctional tachycardia (NPRJT). PSVT was inducible or spontaneously present in 4 of 4 before d-sotalol. After intravenous d-sotalol PSVT was noninducible in three patients and slowed by 40% in one. Atrial fibrillation was inducible or spontaneously present in 4 of 4 before therapy. After intravenous d-sotalol, one became noninducible, and three achieved rate-slowing (the mean falling from 69 to 61 bpm). In one patient, atrial flutter became noninducible; in another, d-sotalol slowed the rate of atrial flutter by 28%. D-sotalol restored sinus rhythm in the patient with NPRJT. Intravenous d-sotalol increased the sinus cycle length; the QTc, PR, and AH intervals; and the AV nodal functional refractory period, the AV nodal effective refractory period; and the right ventricular effective refractory period significantly. The atrial effective refractory period, sinoatrial conduction time, and corrected sinus recovery time tended to increase, but did not reach statistical significance. The QRS, PA, and HV intervals did not change. Mean BP fell 13.4 +/- 9.2% after intravenous d-sotalol, but no adverse symptoms developed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Use of intracardiac recordings to determine the site of drug action in paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia

Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia most often results from atrioventricular (AV) reentry using an accessory AV pathway (Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome) or reentry within the region of the AV node. In AV reentry, using an accessory pathway, suppression of the tachycardia may be achieved by depressing either anterograde AV nodal conduction or retrograde accessory pathway conduction. Intracardiac recordings and programmed electrical stimulation have established that beta-adrenergic antagonists and calcium channel blockers principally affect AV nodal conduction (anterograde limb of the reentrant circuit), whereas class IA and IC agents principally affect the accessory AV pathway (retrograde limb). Pharmacologic therapy has been more effective when directed at the limb in which conduction is most marginal at the tachycardia rate (weak limb). In individual patients, intracardiac recordings and programmed electrical stimulation can be used to identify the weak limb, indicating the class of agents most likely to be effective. Specialized techniques allowing direct recording of accessory pathway activation suggest that limitations in accessory pathway conduction may be explained by anatomic impediments. Conduction is most limited at the atrial interface of the accessory pathway in some patients, whereas in others the ventricular interface may be the limiting factor. Class IA and IC agents appear to have the greatest effect at sites where conduction is most tenuous, i.e., at the anatomic impediments. Similar considerations apply to AV nodal reentry. Anterograde slow AV nodal pathway conduction is most often depressed by digitalis preparations, beta-adrenergic antagonists, and calcium channel blockers, whereas retrograde fast AV nodal pathway conduction is more often depressed by class IA and IC agents. Intracardiac recordings and programmed electrical stimulation can also be used in these patients to identify the weak limb and direct pharmacologic therapy. Direct catheter recordings of AV nodal conduction remain elusive, limiting knowledge of the different conduction properties of the anterograde and retrograde limbs and the site(s) of drug action. Studies in progress, comparing the retrograde AV nodal conduction time during tachycardia with that during ventricular pacing at the same rate, suggest that the His bundle may be incorporated in the reentrant circuit in some patients. It appears that verapamil more readily depresses retrograde fast pathway conduction in these patients than in those in whom the His bundle does not form part of the reentrant circuit, but the reasons for this are unknown.

Electrophysiologic effects of intravenous and oral sotalol for sustained ventricular tachycardia secondary to coronary artery disease

The electrophysiologic effects of intravenous sotalol (1.5 mg/kg load followed by 0.008 mg/kg maintenance, mean dose 150 +/- 23 mg) and oral sotalol (mean dose 583 +/- 204 mg daily) were prospectively evaluated in 16 patients undergoing electrophysiologic evaluation for sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) secondary to coronary artery disease. Electrocardiographic intervals, indexes of sinus and atrioventricular node function and indexes of atrial and ventricular function were assessed. Inducibility or noninducibility of sustained VT and characteristics of the induced arrhythmia were also evaluated. Intravenous and oral sotalol exerted similar beta-blocking effects, which included significant prolongation of sinus cycle length (baseline 820 +/- 165 ms, intravenous sotalol 1,077 +/- 206 ms, oral sotalol 1,141 +/- 306 ms), AH interval (baseline 126 +/- 43, intravenous sotalol 169 +/- 42, oral sotalol 197 +/- 55 ms) and Wenckebach cycle length (baseline 375 +/- 70, intravenous sotalol 460 +/- 84, oral sotalol 449 +/- 68 ms). Both intravenous and oral sotalol also prolonged repolarization and refractoriness including significant increases in QT interval (baseline 338 +/- 47, intravenous sotalol 417 +/- 35, oral sotalol 450 +/- 70 ms), atrial effective refractory period (baseline 240 +/- 38, intravenous sotalol 330 +/- 71, oral sotalol 299 +/- 26 ms) and right ventricular effective refractory period (baseline 241 +/- 16, intravenous sotalol 289 +/- 35, oral sotalol 291 +/- 22 ms).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Cellular electrophysiologic responses of isolated neonatal and adult cardiac fibers to d-sotalol

The short-term cellular electrophysiologic actions of d-sotalol on isolated neonatal and adult canine ventricular myocardium and Purkinje fibers were evaluated using standard microelectrode techniques. d-Sotalol, 10(-6) to 10(-4)M, had no effects on action potential amplitude, maximal diastolic potential or action potential upstroke velocity (Vmax) in any neonatal or adult preparation. In five adult myocardial preparations, d-sotalol produced concentration-dependent increases in action potential duration at 50% (APD50) and 90% (APD90) repolarization and effective refractory period. In six neonatal myocardial preparations, d-sotalol produced a biphasic response; APD50, APD90 and effective refractory period decreased at 10(-6) and 10(-5)M. At 10(-4)M, these values increased significantly but to a lesser extent compared with values in adults. In seven adult Purkinje fibers, d-Sotalol significantly increased APD50, APD90 and effective refractory period in a concentration-dependent manner. All six neonatal Purkinje fibers responded in a biphasic manner, with values for APD50, APD90 and effective refractory period being less than control at 10(-6)M and near control values at 10(-5)M. At 10(-4)M, these variables were significantly increased, but to a lesser extent than in adult preparations. Our data confirm the typical class III effects of d-sotalol in adult cardiac tissues. The shortening of repolarization and refractoriness at lower drug concentrations in developing cardiac tissues may relate to age-dependent differences in cellular ionic function and basic electrophysiology.

New antiarrhythmic drugs

While controversy still exists as to the precise indications for the treatment of all forms of ventricular arrhythmia, advances in the number and, more importantly, type of antiarrhythmic drugs can provide the clinician with a rational basis for selecting antiarrhythmic drug therapy. A host of new agents with different pharmacokinetic and electrophysiological actions are now available, and can be compared or contrasted to conventional antiarrhythmic agents such as quinidine, procainamide, disopyramide, lignocaine (lidocaine) and bretylium. This review summarises the electrophysiological, haemodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and efficacy and safety data of mexiletine, tocainide, flecainide, encainide, propafenone, amiodarone, sotalol, pirmenol, cibenzoline (cifenline) and ethmozine (moracizine, moricizine), and aims to provide a basis on which clinicians can compare and contrast these agents and form an algorithm for selection of antiarrhythmic drug therapy in the treatment of patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Electropharmacology of sotalol in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome

The beta-adrenoceptor-blocking and class III effects of sotalol were assessed in 11 patients with inducible orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia. Serum sotalol concentration, maximum exercise heart rate, and electrophysiologic study data were obtained at control, at the beta-adrenoceptor-blocking dosage (407 +/- 149 mg/day, 1.4 +/- 0.5 micrograms/ml), and at the maximum well-tolerated dosage (924 +/- 337 mg/day, 3.2 +/- 1.3 micrograms/ml). Class III effects (increases in anterograde and retrograde accessory connection effective refractory periods, ventricular effective refractory period, and the QT interval during fixed-rate atrial pacing) were evident at the beta-adrenoceptor-blocking dosage of sotalol and became more marked at the maximum well-tolerated dosage. For example, the mean anterograde accessory connection effective refractory period was significantly increased over control (272 +/- 41 msec) by the beta-adrenoceptor blocker (324 +/- 52 msec) and was further significantly increased by the maximum well-tolerated dose (364 +/- 37 msec). Similarly, the minimum preexcited RR interval during atrial fibrillation was increased in all patients at each dosage tested. Antiarrhythmic efficacy, defined by the absence of inducible, sustained, orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia and a minimum preexcited RR interval during atrial fibrillation of 300 msec or greater, was achieved in four patients at the beta-adrenoceptor-blocking dosage and in another four patients at the maximum well-tolerated dosage. These eight patients received long-term sotalol therapy and none has had recurrent, sustained reciprocating tachycardia during 15 +/- 12 months of follow-up.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Sotalol. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use

Sotalol is a beta-adrenoceptor blocking agent devoid of intrinsic sympathomimetic activity, membrane stabilising actions and cardioselectivity. It lengthens repolarisation and the effective refractory period in all cardiac tissues independently of its antiadrenergic properties. Combining Class II and Class III antiarrhythmic properties, sotalol can be given either intravenously or orally and its pharmacokinetic properties permit long dosing (once or twice daily) intervals. Controlled and uncontrolled studies have established the efficacy of sotalol in mild-to-moderate essential hypertension and in angina of effort. Sotalol reduces anginal frequency and glyceryl trinitrate (nitroglycerin) consumption and increases exercise capacity during treadmill stress tests. In addition, although there is evidence that the drug reduces reinfarction rate in survivors of acute infarction, the data for reduction in sudden death rates in these patients are not as compelling as for other beta-blockers. However, comparative and additional long term studies are required before an accurate assessment of the use of sotalol in these disorders can be made. When used in the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension sotalol is more effective than placebo and comparable to other beta-blockers in reducing elevated blood pressures. In addition, a synergistic antihypertensive response is achieved when sotalol is combined with hydrochlorothiazide. Still, additional well-controlled comparative studies are required before the value of sotalol relative to other drug treatment regimens in the management of hypertension can be made. In preliminary studies sotalol appeared effective in most forms of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias with its effects being similar to those of other beta-blockers. However, preliminary data indicate that sotalol is likely to be more effective than than conventional beta-blockers in converting atrial flutter and fibrillation to sinus rhythm and maintaining stability post-conversion. Sotalol also appears to be a promising agent in the control of ventricular arrhythmias. In suppressing premature ventricular contractions it is at least as effective as procainamide. In ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation, intravenous sotalol (1.5 mg/kg), prevents reinduction by programmed electrical stimulation in 40 to 50% of cases if double stimuli are used. Both prevention of reinducible arrhythmia and the suppression of spontaneous arrhythmias on Holter recordings are predictive of a long term favourable clinical outcome. In patients with reduced ejection fractions, sotalol depresses ventricular function less than conventional beta-blockers.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Effects of intravenous sotalol in patients with atrioventricular accessory pathways

Effects of intravenous injection of 0.6 mg/kg sotalol, a beta-blocking agent with additional class III properties, were studied by means of electrophysiologic techniques in 14 patients, seven with the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome and seven with concealed atrioventricular (AV) accessory pathways. Sotalol brought about a significant increase in the retrograde effective refractory period of the anomalous pathway, whereas changes in the antegrade effective refractory period were more variable. In five of nine patients with electrically induced reciprocating tachycardia sotalol prevented the initiation of sustained reentry. In most cases the suppression of the circus movement was the result of the development of AV nodal block. Thus our data support the use of sotalol for the treatment of tachycardias incorporating anomalous AV conduction pathways.