Effect of aortic regurgitation on the assessment of mitral valve orifice area by Doppler pressure half-time in mitral stenosis

Echocardiographic Assessment of Mitral Stenosis Orifice Area: A Comparison of a Novel Three-Dimensional Method Versus Conventional Techniques

BACKGROUND

A comprehensive evaluation of mitral stenosis (MS) severity commonly utilizes two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography techniques. However, the complex three-dimensional (3D) structure of the mitral valve (MV) poses challenges to accurate measurements of its orifice area by 2D imaging modalities. We aimed to assess MS severity by comparing measurements of the MV orifice area using conventional echocardiography methods to 3D orifice area (3DOA), a novel echocardiographic technique which minimizes geometric assumptions.

METHODS

Routine 2D and 3D intraoperative transesophageal echocardiographic images from 26 adult cardiac surgery patients with at least moderate rheumatic MS were retrospectively reviewed. Measurements of the MV orifice area obtained by pressure half-time (PHT), proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA), continuity equation, and 3D planimetry were compared to those acquired using 3DOA.

RESULTS

MV areas derived by PHT, PISA, continuity equation, 3D planimetry, and 3DOA (mean value ± standard deviation) were 1.12 ± 0.27, 1.03 ± 0.27, 1.16 ± 0.35, 0.97 ± 0.25, and 0.76 ± 0.21 cm, respectively. Areas obtained from the 3DOA method were significantly smaller than areas derived from PHT (mean difference 0.35 cm, P < .0001), PISA (mean difference: 0.28 cm, P = .0002), continuity equation (mean difference: 0.43 cm, P = .0015), and 3D planimetry (mean difference: 0.19 cm, P < .0001). MV 3DOAs also identified a significantly greater percentage of patients with severe MS (88%) compared to PHT (31%, P = .006), PISA (42%, P = .01), and continuity equation (39%, P = .017) but not in comparison to 3D planimetry (62%, P = .165).

CONCLUSIONS

Novel measures of the stenotic MV 3DOA in patients with rheumatic heart disease are significantly smaller than calculated values obtained by conventional methods and may be consistent with a higher incidence of severe MS compared to 2D techniques. Further investigation is warranted to determine the clinical relevance of 3D echocardiographic techniques used to measure MV area.

Clinical Applicability for the Assessment of the Valvular Mitral Stenosis Severity with Doppler Echocardiography and the Proximal Isovelocity Surface Area (PISA) Method

Evaluation of the severity of valvular mitral stenosis and measurements of the effective rheumatic mitral valve area by noninvasive echocardiography has been well accepted. The area is measured by the two-dimensional planimetry (PLM) method and the Doppler pressure half-time (PHT) method. Recently, the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) by color Doppler technique has been used as a quantitative measurement for valvular heart disease. However, this method needs more validation. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate the clinical applicability of the PISA method in the measurements of effective mitral valve area in patients with rheumatic valvular heart disease. Forty-seven patients aged from 23 to 71 years, with a mean age of 53 +/- 13 (25 male and 22 female, 15 with sinus rhythm, mean heart rate of 83 +/- 14 beats per minute, with rheumatic valvular mitral stenosis without hemodynamically significant mitral regurgitation) were included in the study. Effective mitral valve area (MVA) derived by the PISA method was calculated as follows: 2 x Pi x (proximal aliasing color zone radius)2x aliasing velocity/peak velocity across mitral orifice. Effective mitral valve areas measured by three different methods (PLM, PHT, and PISA) were compared and correlated with those calculated by the "gold standard" invasive Gorlin's formula. The MVA derived from PHT, PLM, PISA and Gorlin's formula were 1.00 +/- 0.31cm2, 0.99 +/- 0.30 cm2, 0.95 +/- 0.30 cm2 and 0.91 +/- 0.29 cm2, respectively. The correlation coefficients (r value) between PHT, PLM, PISA, and Gorlin's formula, respectively, were 0.66 (P = 0.032, SEE = 0.64), 0.67 (P = 0.25, SEE = 0.72) and 0.80 (P = 0.002, SEE = 0.53). In conclusion, the PISA method is useful clinically in the measurement of effective mitral valve area in patients with rheumatic mitral valve stenosis. The technique is relatively simple, highly feasible and accurate when compared with the PHT, PLM, and Gorlin's formula. Therefore, this method could be a promising supplement to methods already in use.

Additional value of three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography for patients with mitral valve stenosis undergoing balloon valvuloplasty

The objective of this study was to validate the additional value of 3-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for patients with mitral valve stenosis undergoing percutaneous mitral balloon valvotomy (PTMV). Therefore, in a series of 21 patients with severe mitral valve stenosis selected for PTMV, 3D TEE was performed before and after PTMV. The mitral valve area was assessed by planimetry pre- and post-PTMV; the mitral valve volume was assessed and attention was paid to the amount of fusion of the commissures. These results were compared with findings by 2-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography using pressure half-time method for assessment of mitral valve area, and were analyzed for the prediction of successful outcome. Pre-PTMV the mitral valve area assessed by 3D TEE was 1.0 +/- 0.3 cm(2) vs 1.2 +/- 0.4 cm(2) assessed by 2-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (P =.03) and post-PTMV it was 1.8 +/- 0.5 cm(2) vs 1.9 +/- 0.6 cm(2) (not significant), respectively. The mitral valve volume could be assessed by 3D TEE (mean 2.4 +/- 2.5 cm(3)) and was inversely correlated to a successful PTMV procedure (P <.001). The 3D TEE method enabled a better description of the mitral valvular anatomy, especially post-PTMV. We conclude that 3D TEE will have additional value over 2-dimensional echocardiography in this group of patients, for selection of patients pre-PTMV, and for analyzing pathology of the mitral valve afterward.

Doppler pressure half-time method of assessing mitral valve area: aortic insufficiency does not adversely affect validity

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the effect of aortic insufficiency on the correlation of pressure half-time-derived mitral valve area with each of 2 standards for mitral valve area (planimetry and cardiac catheterization) in a prospectively assembled cohort of patients scheduled for percutaneous balloon mitral commissurotomy.

BACKGROUND

Although Doppler pressure half-time has been validated as a method for assessing mitral valve area, most previous studies have suggested that this noninvasive technique overestimates mitral valve area in the setting of coexistent aortic insufficiency.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Echocardiography and cardiac catheterization were performed on 212 consecutive patients scheduled for percutaneous balloon mitral commissurotomy. After excluding 35 patients who did not have aortography, the rest were divided into a "no aortic insufficiency [AI] group" (n = 146) including those with trivial or no aortic insufficiency at catheterization and an "AI group" (n = 31 ) including those with mild or moderate aortic insufficiency. The pressure half-time mitral valve area tended to slightly underestimate invasive valve area by 0.04 cm2 in the AI group and to slightly overestimate invasive valve area by 0.06 cm2 in the no AI group. This difference between the groups was not statistically significant (P = .13). The pressure half-time mitral valve area tended to underestimate planimetered valve area by 0.11 cm2 in the AI group and by 0.10 cm2 in the no AI group. There was no difference between the 2 groups (P = .94). Potential confounders that could theoretically mask the effect of aortic insufficiency on the pressure half-time (including age, heart rate, blood pressure, left ventricular diastolic pressure, ejection fraction, mitral regurgitation, and atrial fibrillation) were excluded by multivariable analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

The pressure half-time method of determining mitral valve area is not adversely affected by mild to moderate aortic insufficiency. This finding has implications for the utility of this technique in the rheumatic valvular disease population, in which mitral and aortic valve disease frequently coexist.

Accurate assessment of mitral valve area in patients with mitral stenosis by three-dimensional echocardiography

The accuracy of measurements of mitral valve orifice area (MVA) from three-dimensional echocardiographic (3DE) image data sets obtained by a transthoracic or transesophageal rotational imaging probe was studied in 15 patients with native mitral stenosis. The smallest MVA was identified from a set of eight parallel short-axis cut planes of the mitral valve between the anulus and the tips of leaflets (paraplane echocardiography) and measured by planimetry. In addition, MVA was measured from the two-dimensional short-axis view (2DE). Values of MVA measured by 3DE and 2DE were compared with those calculated from Doppler pressure half-time (PHT) as a gold standard. Observer variabilities were studied for 3DE. MVA measured from PHT ranged between 0.55 and 3.19 cm2 (mean +/- SD 1.57 +/- 0.73 cm2), from 3DE between 0.83 and 3.23 cm2 (mean +/- SD 1.55 +/- 0.67 cm2), and from 2DE between 1.27 and 4.08 cm2 (mean +/- SD 1.9 +/- 0.7 cm2). The variability of intraobserver and interobserver measurements for 3DE measurements was not significantly different (p = 0.79 and p = 0.68, respectively); for interobserver variability, standard error of the estimate = 0.25. There was excellent correlation, close limits of agreement (mean difference +/- 2 SD), and nonsignificant differences between 3DE and PHT for MVA measurements (r = 0.98 [0.02 +/- 0.3] and p = 0.6), respectively. There was moderate correlation, wider limits of agreement, and significant difference between 2DE and PHT for MVA measurements (r = 0.89 [0.32 +/- 0.66] and p = 0.002), respectively. This may be related to the difficulties in visualization of the smallest orifice in precordial short-axis views. This study suggests that three-dimensional image data sets, by providing the possibility of "computer slicing" to generate equidistant parallel cross sections of the mitral valve independently from physically dictated ultrasonic windows, allow accurate and reproducible measurement of the MVA.

Comparison of proximal isovelocity surface area method with pressure half-time and planimetry in evaluation of mitral stenosis

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to 1) compare the accuracy of the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) and Doppler pressure half-time methods and planimetry for echocardiographic estimation of mitral valve area; 2) evaluate the effect of atrial fibrillation on the accuracy of the PISA method; and 3) assess factors used to correct PISA area estimates for leaflet angulation.

BACKGROUND

Despite recognized limitations of traditional echocardiographic methods for estimating mitral valve area, there has been no systematic comparison with the PISA method in a single cohort.

METHODS

Area estimates were obtained in patients with mitral stenosis by the Gorlin hydraulic formula, PISA and pressure half-time method in 48 patients and by planimetry in 36. Two different factors were used to correct PISA estimates for leaflet angle (theta): 1) plane-angle factor (theta/180 [theta in degrees]); and 2) solid-angle factor [1-cos(theta/2)].

RESULTS

After exclusion of patients with significant mitral regurgitation, the correlation between Gorlin and PISA areas (0.88) was significantly greater (p < 0.04) than that between Gorlin and pressure half-time (0.78) or Gorlin and planimetry (0.72). The correlation between Gorlin and PISA area estimates was lower in atrial fibrillation than sinus rhythm (0.69 vs. 0.93), but the standard error of the estimate was only slightly greater (0.24 vs. 0.19 cm2). The average ratio of the solid- to the plane-angle correction factors was approximately equal to previously reported values of the orifice contraction coefficient for tapering stenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

1) The accuracy of PISA area estimates in mitral stenosis is at least comparable to those of planimetry and pressure half-time. 2) Reasonable accuracy of the PISA method is possible in irregular rhythms. 3) A simple leaflet angle correction factor, theta/180 (theta in degrees), yields the physical orifice area because it overestimates the vena contracta area by a factor approximately equal to the contraction coefficient for a tapering stenosis.

Is cardiac catheterization necessary in the era of echocardiography? Cost-effective approach combining echocardiography and cardiac catheterization

Definitive evaluation of cardiovascular disease is traditionally accomplished by cardiac catheterization. Advances in transthoracic and transesophageal Doppler echocardiography provides an accurate and cost-effective approach when compared to cardiac catheterization. Recent data suggests that for most adult patients with aortic or mitral valve disease, Doppler echocardiographic data enables the clinician to make the same decision reached with catheterization data. Echo and Doppler studies are useful in guiding certain therapeutic interventional procedures, and in the diagnosis of aortic dissection, mechanical complications of myocardial infarction, and in identifying aortic atheromas as a potential source of embolism. Future research will need to demonstrate that not only is echocardiography cost-effective, but that it will change the outcome of the patient.

Angle of incidence does not affect accuracy of mitral stenosis area calculation by pressure half-time: application to Doppler transesophageal echocardiography

Continuous wave Doppler transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) may allow the estimation of stenotic mitral valve area. Intuitively the posterolateral position of the transducer appears to limit the application of TEE for this purpose because of the excessive angle of incidence to mitral valve inflow. However, algebraic equations can be used to predict that the angle of incidence should not affect mitral valve area derived by using pressure half-time. To test the validity of this prediction and the potential application of Doppler TEE to estimate mitral valve area, 28 patients (21 women, 7 men) with a mean age of 59 +/- 14 years with mitral stenosis were studied by continuous wave transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and TEE guided color flow Doppler. TTE was performed from the apical four-chamber (TEE-0) and a modified parasternal four-chamber (TTE-MAL) plane as a means of intentionally increasing the angle of incidence. TEE was done by using the horizontal (TEE-HAX) and vertical (TEE-VAX) planes. Mitral valve area was calculated by pressure half-time method. Mean mitral valve area did not differ (p = not significant [NS]) between TTE-0 (1.26 +/- 0.84 cm2), TTE-MAL (1.37 +/- 0.94 cm2), TEE-HAX (1.39 +/- 0.92 cm2), and TEE-VAX (1.35 +/- 0.89 cm2). The estimated mean angle of incidence during TTE-MAL was 45 +/- 12 degrees (range 21 to 68 degrees). Six (21%) of 28 and 9 (32%) of 28 patients had an underestimation of transmitral peak velocities with TEE from the horizontal or vertical planes, respectively. However, excellent correlations were found between mitral valve area derived by using TEE-0 versus TTE-MAL (r = 0.97; SEE = 0.25 cm2; intercept = 0.02 cm2; slope = 1.08; and p = 0.0001), TEE-HAX (r = 0.91; SEE = 0.39 cm2; intercept = 0.14 cm2; slope = 1.00; and p = 0.0001) and TEE-VAX (r = 0.92; SEE = 0.36 cm2; intercept = 0.13 cm2; slope = 0.97; and p = 0.0001). These results are directly applicable to Doppler TEE in the determination of mitral stenosis area by pressure half-time, whereby 21% to 32% of patients using the horizontal or vertical transesophageal planes may have a significant angle of incidence leading to underestimation of transmitral valve velocities. Future studies comparing Doppler TEE with cardiac catheterization are of interest. However, the present study suggests that Doppler TEE will play an important role in the hemodynamic assessment of the severity of mitral valve stenosis.

Two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic determination of mitral valve area in adults with mitral stenosis

Two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography has been shown to be a reliable and accurate method of measuring stenotic mitral valve orifice area. Little data exist on the role of two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography for this purpose. Thus in 45 adult patients with mitral stenosis mitral valve area was determined by direct planimetry with the use of two-dimensional transesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography. Transesophageal was less feasible than transthoracic echocardiography in the 45 patients (69% vs. 89%, p < 0.025). In 14 patients, two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography was not feasible, primarily because of leaflet dropout. In 30 patients, transesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography were feasible, and measurements of mitral valve area by the two techniques correlated well (r = 0.91, SEE = 0.33 cm2, p < 0.0001). Mean mitral valve orifice area determined by transesophageal echocardiography (1.54 +/- 0.75 cm2; range 0.56 to 3.49 cm2) and by transthoracic echocardiography (1.55 +/- 0.78 cm2; range 0.62 to 3.68 cm2) did not differ (p = NS). The absolute (0.24 +/- 0.22 cm2) and percent (19% +/- 21%) differences between mitral valve area determined by transesophageal versus transthoracic echocardiography were small. These data show that mitral valve area in patients with mitral stenosis can be accurately measured by direct planimetry with two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. Technical refinements such as lateral-gain-compensation features may improve the feasibility of two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography for measurements of mitral stenosis area, and this technique may become an adjunct to transthoracic echocardiography in the assessment of severity of mitral stenosis.

Pharmacodynamic Doppler determination of mitral valve area in patients with significant aortic regurgitation

In patients with combined mitral stenosis (MS) and aortic regurgitation (AR), the Doppler-determined mitral valve area (MVA) may be overestimated due to a shorter than expected pressure half-time. We performed Doppler echocardiography at baseline and after inhalation of amyl nitrite in 10 patients with combined MS and AR (Group I) and in five patients with MS alone (Group II). AR severity was reduced by amyl nitrite inhalation in all Group I patients, with a decrease in mean jet height/LVOT ratio from 32% to 21% (p < 0.01). Pressure half-time increased in Group I after amyl nitrite, with a mean reduction in the calculated MVA of 0.15 cm2 (p < 0.01). Group II had no significant changes in pressure half-time or Doppler-determined MVA after amyl nitrite, whereas both groups had comparable increases in heart rate, mean transmitral velocity, and mean transmitral pressure gradient. In patients with combined MS and AR, we conclude that amyl nitrite significantly increases pressure half-time while reducing the severity of AR. These findings support earlier reports of MVA overestimation when pressure half-time is used in the presence of AR.

Percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty for mitral stenosis with and without associated aortic regurgitation

Between November 1985 and December 1991, percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty (PBMV) with the Inoue balloon catheter (Toray Marketing & Sales [America], Inc., New York, N.Y.) was performed in 53 patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis and associated mild to moderate aortic regurgitation. Mean left atrial pressure was 22.5 +/- 8.6 mm Hg and 9.7 +/- 5.5 mm Hg before and after PBMV, respectively (p < 0.001). The mean diastolic mitral gradient as determined by the catheter method decreased from 18.7 +/- 11.4 mm Hg to 2.1 +/- 3.1 mm Hg (p < 0.001). The echocardiographic mitral valve area was 1.0 +/- 0.2 cm2, 2.0 +/- 0.6 cm2, and 1.9 +/- 0.5 cm2, before and after PBMV and at follow-up (p < 0.001 before PBMV vs after PBMV and at follow-up). The mean diastolic mitral gradient as determined by two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography was 19.3 +/- 8.4 mm Hg, 5.2 +/- 4.1 mm Hg, and 6.6 +/- 3.3 mm Hg, before and after PBMV and at follow-up, respectively (p < 0.001). The phonocardiographic interval between the Q wave and the mitral component of the first heart sound was 85.2 +/- 15.2 msec, 74.2 +/- 13.4 msec, and 72.3 +/- 15.7 msec before and after PBMV and at follow-up (p < 0.001 before PBMV vs after PBMV and at follow-up). The phonocardiographic interval between the aortic second sound and opening snap was 73.4 +/- 18.1 msec, 88.7 +/- 9.6 msec, and 92.1 +/- 11.7 msec before and after PBMV and at follow-up (p < 0.001 before PBMV vs after PBMV and at follow-up). The voltage of P loop in the frontal plane of the vectorcardiogram was 0.25 +/- 0.04 mV, 0.21 +/- 0.04 mV, and 0.20 +/- 0.03 mV before and after PBMV and at follow-up (p < 0.001 before PBMV vs after PBMV and at follow-up). The New York Heart Association classification improved from class II in 26 patients and class III in 27 patients before PBMV to class I in 48 patients and class II in five patients after PBMV. These hemodynamic, noninvasive, and clinical results were not significantly different from those that were obtained in 112 patients with mitral stenosis without associated aortic regurgitation, who were studied during the same period in our cardiac catheterization laboratory. It was concluded that patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis are suitable candidates for PBMV whether or not they have associated aortic regurgitation of mild to moderate degree.

Etiology of the Austin Flint murmur

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to determine the mechanism of the Austin Flint murmur.

BACKGROUND

More than 100 years after the initial description of the Austin Flint murmur, the etiology of the murmur remains unclear.

METHODS

M-mode and two-dimensional echocardiography, conventional and color flow Doppler study, and cine nuclear magnetic resonance (cine NMR) imaging were performed in 24 patients with clinically moderate or severe aortic regurgitation. Mitral valve area was determined by planimetry and pressure half-time measurement. Overlap of the aortic regurgitation and mitral inflow jets was graded 0 (no overlap) to 4 (marked overlap) by Doppler study and cine NMR imaging. The volume of signal loss resulting from turbulent blood flow secondary to the aortic regurgitation jet was determined on cine NMR images, and the extent of contact with the left ventricular endocardium was graded 0 (no contact) to 4 (extensive contact).

RESULTS

The presence of an Austin Flint murmur did not correlate with mitral valve area (2.7 +/- 0.8 cm2 with the murmur vs. 2.5 +/- 0.7 cm2 without), overlap of the aortic regurgitation and mitral flow jets (3 +/- 1 vs. 2.3 +/- 1.2), diastolic mitral regurgitation (50% vs. 71%) or fluttering of the anterior mitral valve leaflet (70% vs. 50%). The presence of an Austin Flint murmur correlated best with the volume of signal loss associated with the aortic regurgitation jet on cine NMR imaging (65 +/- 16 ml with the murmur. vs. 38 +/- 11 ml without, p less than 0.001) and the extent of contact of this signal loss with the left ventricular endocardium (2.9 +/- 0.5 vs. 1.5 +/- 0.4, p less than 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The Austin Flint murmur is caused by the aortic regurgitation jet abutting the left ventricular endocardium, resulting in the generation of a low-pitched diastolic rumbling.

The Hatle orifice area formula tested in normal bileaflet mechanical mitral prostheses

The Hatle formula was derived empirically in native mitral stenosis and may not be valid for normal prosthetic valves. Bileaflet mechanical prostheses open fully at low flows and have minimal interindividual variation in orifice area. In these valves effective area and measured manufacturer's area should be similar. We studied 60 patients aged 58 +/- 12 yr at a mean of 5 months after implantation with a CarboMedics prosthesis. There was a coexistent aortic prosthesis in 21. All diastolic measurements were averaged over 5 beats and stroke volume was calculated from the integral of the subaortic velocity trace and the cross-sectional area of the left ventricular outflow tract. For the whole group, area by the Hatle formula was 3.1 +/- 0.7 cm2 and measured area was 2.8 +/- 0.4 cm2. There was no significant correlation between these values (p = 0.329). Pressure half-time was more closely correlated with peak transmitral velocity (p = 0.012), RR interval (p = 0.015), diastolic time interval (p = 0.062) and stroke volume (p = 0.074). We conclude that the Hatle formula should not be applied to normal bileaflet mitral prostheses where pressure half-time reflects nonprosthetic factors more closely than orifice area.

Aortic regurgitation shortens Doppler pressure half-time in mitral stenosis: clinical evidence, in vitro simulation and theoretic analysis

Mitral valve areas determined by Doppler pressure half-time were compared with areas obtained by planimetry in two groups of patients with mitral stenosis: 24 patients without aortic regurgitation and 32 patients with more than grade 1 aortic regurgitation. The severity of aortic regurgitation was assessed by color flow mapping; 17 patients had grade 2, 10 had grade 3 and 5 had grade 4 aortic regurgitation. Regression equations for pressure half-time area versus planimetry mitral valve area were calculated separately for the aortic regurgitation (r = 0.88) and the nonaortic regurgitation group (r = 0.86); analysis of covariance revealed a significant (p less than 0.001) difference between the two groups leading to overestimation of planimetry area by the pressure half-time method in the aortic regurgitation group. The mitral valve areas in the group without regurgitation were best calculated with the expression 239/T1/2 (r = 0.77) as compared with a best fit of 195/T1/2 (r = 0.85) for the aortic regurgitation group. To elucidate the mechanisms affecting pressure half-time in aortic regurgitation, an in vitro model of mitral inflow in the presence of varying regurgitant volumes and different ventricular chamber compliances was used. Aortic regurgitation shortened directly measured pressure half-time proportional to the regurgitant fraction but an increase in left ventricular compliance could offset this effect. Finally, in a mathematic model of mitral inflow the competing effects of aortic regurgitation and chamber compliance could be confirmed. In conclusion, aortic regurgitation results clinically in a significant net shortening of pressure half-time leading to mitral valve area overestimation. However, the effect is moderate and individually unpredictable because of changes in chamber compliance.

Limitations of Doppler ultrasound in the assessment of the function of prosthetic mitral valves

Pressure half time has been assumed to be a relatively flow-independent measure of orifice area, but it may also be influenced by atrial and ventricular factors. Pressure half time and peak left ventricular inflow velocity were measured by continuous wave Doppler ultrasound in 164 patients with normally functioning Carpentier-Edwards, Björk-Shiley, and Starr-Edwards mitral prostheses. Pressure half time was shorter in the Björk-Shiley than in the other value types and peak transmitral velocity was highest in the Starr-Edwards prostheses. These differences, however, were partly explained by coexistent differences in transmitral flow. Filling time accounted for 19% and stroke volume for 15% of the variance in pressure half time compared with only 5.6% for prosthetic design and 0.4% for annulus diameter when each of these variables was considered alone. The design of the prosthesis explained 18% of the variance in peak transmitral velocity, while cardiac output and annulus diameter did not contribute significantly. With Doppler ultrasound it is impossible to define reliable normal ranges for prosthetic function independently of atrial and ventricular function. Formulas for orifice area based on peak transmitral velocity and flow seem more likely to reflect the behaviour of normally functioning prostheses than those based on pressure half time.

Valvar stenosis: a comparison of clinical assessment, echocardiography, Doppler ultrasound and catheterisation

The relative merits of noninvasive techniques in the assessment of valve stenosis were examined by comparing the results of clinical assessment by two independent clinicians, the cross-sectional echocardiogram and Doppler ultrasound using the results of cardiac catheterisation as reference in 58 patients with a total of 60 stenotic valve lesions. Doppler ultrasound was the most reliable technique; it was correct in 57 (95%) of the 60 lesions. Clinical assessment and cross sectional echocardiography were correct in 48 (80%), and 46 (77%) of the 60 lesions, respectively. In 7 instances 2 noninvasive assessments were wrong in the same patient but on no occasion were all 3 techniques misleading in the same patient. In 17 patients with severe mitral stenosis, clinical assessment Doppler ultrasound and cross-sectional echocardiography were correct in 14 (82%), 16 (94%) and 17 (100%) patients, respectively, whilst in the 4 patients with moderate mitral stenosis the corresponding figures were 3 (75%), 4 (100%) and 2 (50%). In mild mitral stenosis (3 patients), the clinical assessment was correct in 2 (67%) patients, Doppler ultrasound in 3 (100%) patients and cross-sectional echocardiography in 2 (67%) patients. In 22 patients with severe aortic stenosis, the clinical assessment and Doppler ultrasound were correct in every patient (100%), whilst the cross-sectional echocardiogram was correct in 18 (82%) patients. In 11 patients with moderate aortic stenosis, the clinical assessment was correct in only 5 (45%) patients, the cross-sectional echocardiogram in 5 (45%) patients and Doppler assessment in 9 (82%) patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Comparison of hemodynamic pressure half-time method and Gorlin formula with Doppler and echocardiographic determinations of mitral valve area in patients with combined mitral stenosis and regurgitation

Mitral valve area determined by the Gorlin formula in patients with combined mitral stenosis and regurgitation underestimates the true orifice size. Recent data suggest Doppler ultrasound and two-dimensional echocardiography more accurately estimate the mitral valve area in patients with mixed mitral valvular disease. This study assessed the accuracy of an alternate method, the hemodynamic pressure half-time method, for mitral valve area determination in such patients. In 22 patients, 28 separate mitral valve areas were calculated by the hemodynamic pressure half-time method, the Gorlin formula, and the Gorlin formula corrected for mitral regurgitation, and were compared with results calculated by the Doppler pressure half-time method. Six patients were studied both before and after balloon mitral valvuloplasty. In addition, mitral valve areas calculated by all four methods were compared with results obtained by planimetry in 15 patients with technically optimal echocardiograms. The mitral valve areas determined by hemodynamic pressure half-time corretated closely with the valve areas determined by Doppler (r = 0.90), whereas mitral valve areas determined by the Gorlin formula (both without and with correction for mitral regurgitation) did not correlate as well with the Doppler-estimated valve areas (r = 0.47 and r = 0.56, respectively). Correlation between the Doppler-derived mitral valve areas and the planimetered valve areas was also good (r = 0.84), as was that between the mitral valve areas calculated by hemodynamic pressure half-time and those calculated by planimetry (r = 0.78).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Characteristic Doppler echocardiographic pattern of mitral inflow velocity in severe aortic regurgitation

In symptomatic severe aortic regurgitation, left ventricular diastolic pressure increases rapidly, often exceeding left atrial pressure in late diastole. This characteristic hemodynamic change should be reflected in the Doppler mitral inflow velocity, which is the direct result of the diastolic pressure difference between the left ventricle and left atrium. Mitral inflow velocity was obtained by pulsed wave Doppler echocardiography in 11 patients (6 men, 5 women: mean age 53 years) with severe symptomatic aortic regurgitation and compared with normal values from 11 sex- and age-matched control subjects. The following Doppler variables were determined: velocity of early filling wave (E), velocity of late filling wave due to atrial contraction (A), E to A ratio (E/A), deceleration time and pressure half-time. In severe aortic regurgitation, E and E/A (1.13 m/s and 3.3, respectively) were significantly higher (p less than 0.001) than normal (0.60 m/s and 1.5, respectively). Deceleration time and pressure half-time (117 and 34 ms, respectively) were significantly shorter (p less than 0.001) than normal (203 and 59 ms, respectively). Late filling wave velocity (A) was not statistically different in the two groups, although it tended to be lower in the patient group (0.39 versus 0.50 m/s). Diastolic mitral regurgitation was present in eight patients (73%). M-mode echocardiography of the mitral valve, performed in 10 patients, showed that only 3 (30%) had premature mitral valve closure. In symptomatic severe aortic regurgitation, the Doppler mitral inflow velocity pattern is characteristic, with increased early filling wave velocity (E) and early to late filling wave ratio (E/A) and decreased deceleration time of the E wave.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)