Role of heparin after intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction

Accuracy, reproducibility and costs of different laboratory assays for the monitoring of unfractionated heparin in clinical practice: a prospective evaluation study and survey among Swiss institutions

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the accuracy, reproducibility and costs of different laboratory assays for the monitoring of unfractionated heparin (UFH) in clinical practice and to study test utilisation in Switzerland.

DESIGN

Prospective evaluation study and survey among Swiss hospitals and laboratories.

SETTING

Secondary care hospital in rural Switzerland (evaluation study); all Swiss hospitals and laboratories (survey).

PARTICIPANTS

All consecutive patients, monitored for treatment with UFH during two time periods, were included (May to July 2014 and January to February 2015; n=254).

OUTCOME MEASURES

Results of activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), thrombin time (TT), prothrombinase-induced clotting time (PiCT) and anti-Xa activity with respect to UFH concentration RESULTS: Spearman's correlation coefficient (r_s) with regard to anti-Xa activity was 0.68 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.75) for aPTT, 0.79 (0.69 to 0.86) for TT and 0.94 (0.93 to 0.95) for PiCT. The correlation (r_s) between anti-Xa activity and heparin concentration as determined by spiking plasma samples was 1.0 (1.0 to 1.0). The coefficient of variation was at most 5% for PiCT and anti-Xa activity (within-run as well as day-to-day variability). The total costs per test in Swiss Francs (SFr) were SFr23.40 for aPTT, SFr33.30 for TT, SFr15.70 for PiCT and SFr24.15 for anti-Xa activity. The various tests were employed in Swiss institutions with the following frequencies: aPTT 53.2%, TT 21.6%, anti-Xa activity 7.2%, PiCT 1.4%; 16.6% of hospitals performed more than one test.

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy and reproducibility of PiCT and anti-Xa activity for monitoring of UFH was superior, and analytical costs were equivalent to or lower than aPTT and TT.

Prognostic value of post-procedural aPTT in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary PCI

Unfractionated heparin is the most commonly used anticoagulant in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and its effect can be monitored with activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). However, the optimal aPTT range during heparin therapy after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is yet to be defined. A mean aPTT was calculated of all aPTT measurements in the first 24 hours after pPCI in a total of 1,876 STEMI patients. Mean aPTT measurements were stratified into four categories; < 1.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), 1.5 – 2.0 times ULN (the therapeutic group), 2.01 – 3.99 times ULN, and ≥ 4 times ULN. Compared to patients with a therapeutic aPTT, patients with aPTTs < 1.5 times ULN had no increase in recurrent ischaemic events and had similar rates of bleeding complications. Patients with a mean aPTT ≥ 4 times ULN had higher rates recurrent ischaemic and haemorrhagic complications. After multivariable analyses, aPTT ratios ≥ 4 times ULN were no longer associated with recurrent ischaemic events, but remained a strong predictor of severe and moderate bleeding (hazard ratio [HR] 4.64, p = 0.016 and HR 2.27, p = 0.052). In conclusion, in 1,876 STEMI patients treated with pPCI, low aPTTs in the first 24 hours after PCI were not associated with an increase in ischaemic events, whereas high aPTT values were associated with more frequent bleeding complications. These results indicate no clear benefit as well as a safety concern with heparin treatment after primary PCI.

Contemporary anticoagulation therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous intervention

The proper use of anticoagulants is crucial for ensuring optimal patient outcomes post percutaneous interventions in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Anticoagulant agents such as unfractionated heparin, a thrombin inhibitor; low-molecular weight heparins, predominantly Factor Xa inhibitors; fondaparinux, a Factor Xa inhibitor and bivalirudin, a direct thrombin inhibitor have been developed to target various steps in the coagulation cascade to prevent formation of thrombin. Optimal anticoagulation achieves the correct balance between thrombosis and bleeding and is related to optimal outcomes with minimal complications. This review will discuss the mechanisms and appropriate use of current and emerging anticoagulant therapies used during percutaneous interventions.

Activated partial thromboplastin time versus antifactor Xa heparin assay in monitoring unfractionated heparin by continuous intravenous infusion

BACKGROUND

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) has been used clinically for 5 decades. Despite being a cornerstone of anticoagulation, UFH is limited by its unpredictable pharmacokinetic profile, which makes close laboratory monitoring necessary. The most common methods for monitoring UFH are the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and antifactor Xa heparin assay (anti-Xa HA), but both present challenges, and the optimal method to monitor UFH remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the performance of the aPTT with the anti-Xa HA for efficiency and safety of monitoring intravenous UFH infusions.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study conducted in an 852-bed academic medical center.

RESULTS

One hundred patients receiving intravenous UFH for a variety of indications were enrolled in the study; 50 were assigned to each group. The mean (SD) time to achieve therapeutic anticoagulation was significantly less in the anti-Xa HA group compared with the aPTT group (28 [16] vs 48 [26] hours, p < 0.001). In addition, a greater percentage of anti-Xa HA patients compared to aPTT patients achieved therapeutic anticoagulation at 24 hours (OR 3.5; 95% CI 1.5 to 8.7) and 48 hours (OR 10.9; 95% CI 3.3 to 44.2). Patients in the anti-Xa HA group also had more test values within the therapeutic range (66% vs 42%, p < 0.0001). A significant difference was seen between the 2 groups in the number of aPTT or anti-Xa HA tests performed per 24 hours (p < 0.0001) and number of infusion rate changes per 24 hours (p < 0.01), both favoring the anti-Xa HA group.

CONCLUSIONS

Monitoring intravenous UFH infusions with the anti-Xa HA, compared to the aPTT, achieves therapeutic anticoagulation more rapidly, maintains the values within the goal range for a longer time, and requires fewer adjustments in dosage and repeated tests.

Weight-based argatroban dosing nomogram for treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

BACKGROUND

Manufacturer recommendations for argatroban use in the setting of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) state that the dosage should be titrated to a goal activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) of 1.5-3 times the baseline aPTT. The lack of a clear dosing strategy with argatroban may result in delayed stabilization of aPTT. There are no published nomograms to guide the dosing of argatroban.

OBJECTIVE

To study the anticoagulant effect and incidence of bleeding and thrombotic events in patients receiving argatroban, with doses determined using a weight-based nomogram.

METHODS

Patients with suspected or documented HIT at an 800-bed teaching community hospital were prospectively treated, in a nonrandomized, nonblinded manner, with argatroban; dosage adjustments were made according to 1 of 2 variations of a dosing nomogram: standard or hepatic/critically ill. The primary outcomes were time to aPTT stabilization and percentage of patients whose aPTTs were within the therapeutic range of 45-90 seconds at 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours. Secondary outcomes were the percentage of patients whose aPTTs were subtherapeutic, supratherapeutic, or above the therapeutic threshold of 45 seconds at each time interval; incidence of thrombotic events; number of dosage adjustments to achieve stabilization; and number of major bleeding events.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients were prospectively treated using the standard (n = 34) and hepatic/critically ill (n = 17) nomograms. Mean time to aPTT stabilization was 16.25 hours with the standard nomogram and 27.05 hours with the hepatic/critically ill nomogram. The percentages of patients with aPTTs within the therapeutic range at each time interval were 82.4%, 82.4%, 88.2%, 96.4%, 100%, and 100% with the standard nomogram and 58.8%, 82.4%, 76.5%, 93.3%, 100%, and 90.9% with the hepatic/critically ill nomogram. There were no thrombotic events after the initiation of argatroban. Three cases of major bleeding occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

The nomogram is an effective dosing tool for achieving and maintaining therapeutic levels of anticoagulation.

The ineffectiveness of a non-weight based heparin regimen in achieving therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) in acute coronary syndrome

Although low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is increasingly being used in the treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), unfractionated intravenous (IV) heparin infusion is still widely used in Australian hospitals for the treatment of ACS. This paper evaluates the effectiveness of a non-weight based heparin regimen in achieving a therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) within 24 hours of IV heparin commencement. A sequential retrospective chart review of 99 medical records of ACS patients in a district hospital in south western Sydney, Australia, was performed. These patients were prescribed IV heparin and did not receive thrombolytic or warfarin therapy. Only 35 per cent reached a therapeutic aPTT level within 24 hours of commencement of IV heparin therapy. Comparison of therapeutic aPTT and non-therapeutic aPTT groups revealed that body weight was the only factor that was significantly different in the two groups. Patients who reached the therapeutic aPTT threshold within 24 hours weighed significantly less (mean body weight: 70.3 kg versus 80.3 kg) than those who did not reach the therapeutic threshold within 24 hours of heparin commencement (t = 3.80, d.f. = 86, p < 0.001). Given that a significant proportion of patients who require IV heparin therapy exceed the 70 kg body weight, the findings from this study suggest that a non-weight based heparin regimen is ineffective in the rapid achievement of therapeutic aPTT.

Issues Regarding the Use of Heparin Following Streptokinase Therapy

The success of thrombolytic therapy is dependent upon the balance of fibrinolytic activity and procoagulant activity. Streptokinase produces fibrin degradation products that have anticoagulant effects and may potentially protect against reocclusion. However, streptokinase also activates platelets and thrombin, and the prothrombotic effects may be more marked than after administration of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA). Administration of high-dose, delayed subcutaneous heparin after streptokinase and aspirin has been shown to have some benefits and some risks. The benefits and risks of adding intravenous heparin to aspirin and streptokinase have not been clearly defined.

Optimizing the Treatment of Unstable Angina

Unstable angina and non--Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI) are at the center of the spectrum of myocardial ischemia, which ranges from stable angina to acute Q-wave MI. In addition to clinical evaluation, cardiac specific markers such as troponin T or I can assist in early diagnosis, triage, and risk stratification. Antithrombotic therapy with aspirin and heparin have been shown to improve the outcome of patients with acute ischemic syndromes. Thrombolytic therapy does not appear to be beneficial in these syndromes. Antiischemic therapy remains an important component of the overall therapy. A strategy of early coronary angiography and revascularization leads to a similar long-term outcome as compared with a more conservative strategy of revascularization for recurrent ischemia, but the early invasive strategy is more expeditious as a large number of conservatively treated patients have recurrent ischemia. At present, many new antithrombotic agents are under active investigation, with the hope that they will lead to further improvement in the clinical outcome of patients with acute ischemic syndromes.

Improved Anticoagulation with a Weight-Adjusted Heparin Nomogram in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Randomized Trial

The optimal heparin dosing schedule to achieve rapid and therapeutic anticoagulation has not been established. The objective of this study is to determine whether an intravenous heparin dosing nomogram based on body weight achieves adequate anticoagulation more rapidly than a standard-care nomogram. Sixty-four patients requiring intravenous heparin treatment for acute coronary syndromes, but who did not receive thrombolytic therapy, were randomized to a standard-care nomogram in which heparin was given as a 5000 unit IV bolus followed by 1000 U/hr, or a weight-adjusted nomogram in which heparin was given as an 80 U/kg IV bolus and 18 U/kg/hr. Activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) values were checked at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 48 hours and adjusted either by 100-200 U/hr (standard-care nomogram) or by 2-4 U/kg/hr (weight-based nomogram). Activated partial thromboplastin times were measured using a widely generalizable laboratory method. The primary goal was to achieve and maintain the APTT between 60 and 90 seconds. The median APTT values were higher in the weight-adjusted group compared with the standard-care group at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 48 hours: 150 versus 83 (p = 0.001), 100 versus 79 (p = 0.09), 66 versus 61 (p = 0.005), 63 versus 56 (p = 0.09), and 64 versus 56 (p = 0.11). At 18 hours only 11% of patients in the weight-adjusted group had an APTT <61 compared with 26% in the standard-care nomogram (p = 0.007). No major bleeding complications were noted in either group. A weight-adjusted heparin nomogram offers improved anticoagulation in the first 24 hours after heparin initiation compared with a standard-care nomogram in patients with acute coronary artery syndromes.

A randomized, multicenter trial of weight-adjusted intravenous heparin dose titration and point-of-care coagulation monitoring in hospitalized patients with active thromboembolic disease. Antithrombotic Therapy Consortium Investigators

BACKGROUND

Therapy with intravenous unfractionated heparin improves clinical outcome in patients with active thromboembolic disease, but achieving and maintaining a therapeutic level of anticoagulation remains a major challenge for clinicians.

METHODS

A total of 113 patients requiring heparin for at least 48 hours were randomly assigned at 7 medical centers to either weight-adjusted or non-weight-adjusted dose titration. They were separately assigned to either laboratory-based or point-of-care (bedside) coagulation monitoring.

RESULTS

Weight-adjusted heparin dosing yielded a higher mean activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) value 6 hours after treatment initiation than non-weight-adjusted dosing (99.9 vs 78.8 seconds; P =.002) and reduced the time required to exceed a minimum threshold (aPTT >45 seconds) of anticoagulation (10.5 vs 8.6 hours; P =.002). Point-of-care coagulation monitoring significantly reduced the time from blood sample acquisition to a heparin infusion adjustment (0.4 vs 1.6 hours; P <.0001) and to reach the therapeutic aPTT range (51 to 80 seconds) (16.1 vs 19.4 hours; P =.24) compared with laboratory monitoring. Although a majority of patients participating in the study surpassed the minimum threshold of anticoagulation within the first 12 hours and reached the target aPTT within 24 hours, maintaining the aPTT within the therapeutic range was relatively uncommon (on average 30% of the overall study period) and did not differ between treatment or monitoring strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

Weight-adjusted heparin dosing according to a standardized titration nomogram combined with point-of-care coagulation monitoring using the BMC Coaguchek Plus System represents an effective and widely generalizable strategy for managing patients with thromboembolic disease that fosters the rapid achievement of a desired range of anticoagulation. Additional work is needed, however, to improve on existing patient-specific strategies that can more effectively sustain a therapeutic state of anticoagulation.

Use of bedside activated partial thromboplastin time monitor to adjust heparin dosing after thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: results of GUSTO-I. Global Utilization of Streptokinase and TPA for Occluded Coronary Arteries

BACKGROUND

The safety and efficacy of bedside monitors of activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) have not been examined in a large population receiving intravenous heparin after thrombolytic treatment for acute myocardial infarction. We compared outcomes among patients monitored with these devices versus standard monitoring methods.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Investigators chose the bedside device (n = 1713 patients) or their standard method (n = 26,162) for all aPTT measurements at their sites. Clinical outcomes at 30 days, 1-year mortality rate, and aPTT levels at 6, 12, and 24 hours were compared. Bedside-monitored patients had significantly less moderate/severe bleeding (10% vs 12%, P < .01), fewer transfusions (7% vs 11%, P < .001), and a smaller decrease in hematocrit (5.5% vs 6.7%, P < .001) but significantly more recurrent ischemia (22% vs 20%, P = .01). Fewer bedside-monitored patients had subtherapeutic aPTT levels at 12 and 24 hours. Among patients with subtherapeutic levels at 6 and 12 hours, more bedside-monitored patients had therapeutic levels when next monitored. After adjustment for baseline differences, no significant difference in mortality rate was observed in bedside-monitored patients at 30 days (4.3% vs 4.8%, P = .27) and at 1 year (7.1% vs 7.7%, P = .38). The groups had similar rates of reinfarction, shock, heart failure, and stroke.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective substudy supports the use of bedside monitoring of heparin anticoagulation after thrombolysis.

Recurrent ischemia after thrombolysis: importance of associated clinical findings. GUSTO-I Investigators. Global Utilization of Streptokinase and t-PA [tissue-plasminogen activator] for Occluded Coronary Arteries

OBJECTIVES

We sought to assess the incidence and clinical relevance of examination data to recurrent ischemia within an international randomized trial.

BACKGROUND

Ischemic symptoms commonly recur after thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction.

METHODS

Patients (n = 40,848) were prospectively evaluated for recurrent angina and transient electrocardiographic (ECG) or hemodynamic changes. Five groups were developed: Group 1, patients with no signs or symptoms of recurrent ischemia; Group 2, patients with angina only; Group 3, patients with angina and ST segment changes; Group 4, patients with angina and hemodynamic abnormalities; and Group 5, patients with angina, ST segment changes and hemodynamic abnormalities. Baseline clinical and outcome variables were compared among the five groups.

RESULTS

Group 1 comprised 32,717 patients, and Groups 2 to 5 comprised 20% of patients (4,488 in Group 2; 3,021 in Group 3; 337 in Group 4; and 285 in Group 5). Patients with recurrent ischemia were more often female, had more cardiovascular risk factors and less often received intravenous heparin. Significantly more extensive and more severe coronary disease, antianginal treatment, angioplasty and coronary bypass surgery were observed as a function of ischemic severity. The 30-day reinfarction rate was 1.6% in Group 1, 6.5% in Group 2, 21.7% in Group 3, 13.1% in Group 4 and 36.5% in Group 5 (p < 0.0001); in contrast, the 30-day mortality rate was significantly lower (p < 0.0001) in Groups 1, 2 and 3 (6.6%, 5.4% and 7.7%, respectively) than in Groups 4 and 5 (21.8% and 29.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Postinfarction angina greatly increases the risk of reinfarction, especially when accompanied by transient ECG changes. However, mortality is markedly increased only in the presence of concomitant hemodynamic abnormalities.

Reevaluation of a weight-based heparin dosing nomogram: is institution-specific modification necessary?

OBJECTIVE

To compare a heparin dosing nomogram using an initial infusion rate of 18 units/kg/h with physician-directed heparin prescribing and with a modified version of the nomogram adjusted for institution-specific data.

METHODS

During consecutive phases of this cohort study, patients' intravenous heparin therapies were initiated and adjusted by using one of the following three methods: (1) physician-directed dosing, (2) a body weight-based dosing nomogram with an initial infusion rate of 18 units/kg/h, and (3) a body weight-based dosing nomogram with an initial infusion rate determined by the median dose of heparin (in units/kg/h) required to achieve therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTTs) during the first two phases. The time required to achieve therapeutic aPTTs as well as the percentage of initial aPTTs in the therapeutic range were compared for the three phases.

RESULTS

The heparin dosing nomogram in which the initial infusion rate was adjusted for our individual institution resulted in a statistically shorter median time until aPTTs were in the therapeutic range than did either the physician-directed dosing or unmodified nomogram groups (6.1 h in the modified nomogram group, 10.5 h in the physician-directed group, 21.5 h in the unmodified nomogram group; p < 0.05 for all differences). Use of the institution-specific nomogram resulted in the greatest percentage of initial aPTTs in the therapeutic range (84% in the 13 units/kg/h nomogram group vs. 47% in the physician-directed group and 18% in the 18 units/kg/h nomogram group; p < 0.05 for all differences).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of a heparin dosing nomogram with an initial infusion rate of 18 units/kg/h resulted in prolongation of the time to reach therapeutic aPTTs. By modifying the nomogram for use at an individual institution, we reduced the time to achieve therapeutic range of aPTTs while still reducing the likelihood of excessive anticoagulation of patients.

Hemostatic complications in renal disorders of the young

This review focuses on the hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications sometimes associated with the most common renal disorders in children. A Medline search of the literature was conducted from 1966 to January 1995, using combinations of key words appropriate for each disorder. Additional references were located through the bibliographies of the publications and recent journals were searched independently. The most common renal disorders with hemostatic complications in children were: renal vein thrombosis (268 children in 80 publications), hemolytic uremic syndrome (473 children in 29 publications), nephrotic syndrome (4,158 children in 51 publications), renal transplantation (3,976 children in 14 publications), glomerulonephritis (20 publications), end-stage renal disease, and dialysis (22 publications). The age distribution, clinical presentation, etiology, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of the affected children were analyzed for each disorder. Children with inherited pre-thrombotic disorders usually do not present during childhood unless there is a secondary risk factor. Similarly, most children with renal disease do not develop thromboembolic complications. Therefore, when a child with a renal disorder develops a thromboembolic event, evaluation for an inherited pre-thrombotic disorder should be seriously considered. Guidelines for the use of heparin and warfarin in these children (both therapeutically and prophylactically) are given. At this time, the risk/benefit of thrombolytic therapy in children is not known and a general recommendation for thrombolytic therapy cannot be made.

Frequency of "optimal anticoagulation" for acute myocardial infarction after thrombolysis with front-loaded recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator and conjunctive therapy with recombinant hirudin (HBW 023). ALKK Study Group

This retrospective analysis reviewed 183 patients with acute myocardial infarction who were given front-loaded recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) and r-hirudin (HBW 023) in 1 of 4 dose groups (bolus dose of 0.07, 0.1, 0.2, or 0.4 mg/kg, followed by an infusion of 0.05, 0.06, 0.1, or 0.15 mg/kg/hour over 48 hours). Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) levels were determined at baseline and at 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, and 48 hours. Of the 178 patients with r-hirudin treatment for > or = 12 hours, anticoagulation was optimal in 55.1% (all aPTTs > 2 x baseline), suboptimal in 33.7% (lowest aPTT > 1.5 but < 2 x baseline), and inadequate in 11.2% (> or = 1 aPTT but < 1.5 x baseline). Optimal anticoagulation was observed more frequently in the higher dose groups (dose 1, 15%; dose 2, 44.4%; dose 3, 63.4%; dose 4, 73.4%; p for trend < 0.0001). Patency (according to Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction trial grade 2 or 3) of the infarct artery after 36 to 48 hours was higher in the group with optimal anticoagulation compared with those with suboptimal or inadequate anticoagulation: 97.9%, 88.4%, and 85%, respectively (p = 0.03 optimal vs suboptimal or inadequate anticoagulation). In conclusion, r-hirudin in a dose of 0.1 or 0.15 mg/kg/hour achieves an optimal anticoagulation in about 63% or 74% of patients, which is associated with an enhanced patency 24 to 48 hours after rt-PA. A subsequent study revealed that this effective anticoagulation may be accompanied by an increased risk of severe bleeding complications after thrombolysis.

Maintenance of coronary patency after fibrinolysis with tissue factor pathway inhibitor

BACKGROUND

Pharmacological coronary fibrinolysis induces procoagulant effects that contribute to delayed recanalization and early reocclusion. This study was designed to determine whether brief inhibition of activation of the coagulation cascade with tissue factor pathway inhibitor, a physiological inhibitor of activated factor X and its activation by the tissue factor/factor VII complex, would facilitate fibrinolysis, sustain patency of recanalized arteries, or both.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Platelet-rich coronary thrombi were induced with anodal current that elicited intimal injury in 21 conscious dogs. Each was randomized to human recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rTPA 1.0 mg/kg IV over 1 hour) with infusion of 50 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 of human recombinant tissue factor pathway inhibitor (rTFPI, n = 7), 100 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 of rTFPI (n = 8), or 300 mmol/L arginine phosphate buffer as a control (n = 6) concomitant with and for 1 hour after infusion of the plasminogen activator. Recanalization, verified with proximal Doppler flow probes, occurred in all but 1 dog given the high dose of rTFPI. It was not accelerated by conjunctive rTFPI. Reocclusion occurred within 90 minutes after infusion of rTPA in all 6 control dogs. However, reocclusion was delayed and patency was sustained for the entire 24-hour observation interval in 2 of 6 dogs (excluding 1 that did not survive) given the low dose and in 4 of 6 dogs (excluding 1 that did not receive the desired amount) given the high dose of rTFPI (P < .05 compared with controls). Cyclic flow variations indicative of platelet aggregation and disaggregation locally were virtually eliminated by rTFPI (3 +/- 4[SD]/h in dogs given the low dose and 2 +/- 2/h in those given the high dose of rTFPI compared with 13 +/- 12/h in controls, P < .05). In addition, rTFPI increased activated partial thromboplastin time and prothrombin time only at the high dose (1.4 +/- 0.3 and 2.1 +/- 0.9 times baseline) and had no effects on platelet aggregation assayed ex vivo and only minimal effects on bleeding time assayed in vivo.

CONCLUSIONS

Brief inhibition of the coagulation system by administration of rTFPI sustains patency of arteries recanalized by pharmacological fibrinolysis without markedly perturbing hemostatic mechanisms.

Role of thrombin compared with factor Xa in the procoagulant activity of whole blood clots

BACKGROUND

Thrombi are known to induce activation of the coagulation system, which may be a mechanism for progression of thrombosis and its recurrence after thrombolysis. This study was designed to characterize the relative role of thrombin and activated factor X (factor Xa) as mediators of procoagulant activity of whole blood clots in blood and plasma.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Clots formed from human blood were incubated in recalcified (25 mmol/L CaCl2) citrated plasma or nonanticoagulated blood with increasing concentrations of recombinant desulfatohirudin (hirudin) to inhibit thrombin activity, recombinant tick anticoagulant peptide (TAP) or recombinant tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) to inhibit factor Xa, or heparin. Fibrinopeptide A (FPA) was assayed serially as an index of procoagulant (thrombin) activity. FPA generation was greatly accelerated by addition of clots to recalcified plasma (from 1251 +/- 211 ng/mL after 15 minutes without clot to 5916 +/- 1412 ng/mL with clot, n = 7, P < .01) or whole blood (4803 +/- 761 ng/mL with clot compared with 546 +/- 233 without clot, n = 5, P < .05) and was attenuated by inhibitors of thrombin (> 90% inhibition of FPA with 0.05 mumol/L hirudin and 1.0 U/mL heparin) and factor Xa (> 90% inhibition of FPA with 1.0 mumol/L TAP and 0.15 mumol/L TFPI) in a concentration-dependent manner. Preincubation of clots with tissue-type plasminogen activator sufficient to induce partial clot lysis increased the rate of thrombin-induced FPA generation by increasing the surface area of clot exposed to plasma. However, procoagulant activity induced by partially lysed clots was attenuated by lower concentrations of both thrombin and Xa inhibitors, presumably because access of the inhibitors to bound procoagulant molecules was facilitated. Comparable results were obtained with incubations in nonanticoagulated blood.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that factor Xa is primarily responsible for the procoagulant activity of clots in vitro and suggest a potential molecular mechanism for the observed efficacy of inhibitors of factor Xa in preventing recurrent thrombosis after coronary thrombolysis.

Heparin as adjunctive therapy to coronary thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction

For many years anticoagulation has played a role in the prevention and management of thromboembolic complications associated with acute myocardial infarction. However, the role of heparin therapy after pharmacologic thrombolysis in myocardial infarction remains controversial. Debate continues regarding the necessity of heparin treatment after thrombolytic therapy as well as the mode by which it is administered. The purpose of this review is to summarize the findings of clinical trials designed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of heparin as an adjuvant agent to thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. Data regarding the clinical effectiveness of heparin are presented. Information and recommendations regarding the optimal dose, route of administration, timing of initiation, and duration of heparin treatment are provided.

Thrombolytic retreatment with tissue plasminogen activator for threatened reinfarction and thrombotic coronary reocclusion

Following successful coronary arterial thrombolysis, thrombogenic substrate persists, increasing the risk of recurrent thrombosis, reocclusion, and reinfarction. The preferred treatment in this setting has not been established. Although many patients receive mechanical revascularization, it is conceivable that repeat thrombolysis, primarily with tissue plasminogen activator, represents the most readily available and effective alternative.

Management of acute myocardial infarction in the very elderly

Coronary artery disease is highly prevalent among the elderly, and the incidence of myocardial infarction (MI) is high. Still, the notion of optimal treatment for the elderly patient with MI remains unclear. This review will first discuss some of the characteristics of the aging myocardium that impact on the care of elderly cardiac patients. Next, the therapeutic options and their appropriateness for the aged patient are presented. Thrombolytic and beta-blocker therapies are reviewed extensively since they remain among the controversial issues in geriatric cardiology. Other well-known as well as experimental therapies are also discussed.

Heparin-induced prolongation of partial thromboplastin time after thrombolysis: relation to coronary artery patency. HART Investigators

Having previously shown in the Heparin Aspirin Reperfusion Trial that the empiric use of early intravenous heparin after recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) is an important component in the overall treatment strategy, we examine in this report the specific relation between the degree of prolongation of activated partial thromboplastin time and coronary artery patency. To evaluate the hypothesis that arterial patency after administration of rt-PA for acute myocardial infarction is sustained by effective anticoagulation, activated partial thromboplastin time of heparin recipients was determined 8 and 12 h after the start of thrombolysis. Mean activated partial thromboplastin time was higher among patients with an open infarct-related artery than in those with a closed artery (81 +/- 4 vs. 54 +/- 9 s, p less than 0.02). Only 45% of patients with values less than 45 s at both 8 and 12 h had Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade 2 or 3 in the infarct-related artery at 18 h. In contrast, 88% of patients with activated partial thromboplastin time greater than 45 s and 95% of those with values greater than 60 s had an open infarct-related artery at 18 h (p = 0.003 and 0.0006, respectively). Among patients with an initially patent infarct-related artery who underwent repeat angiography at 7 days, activated partial thromboplastin time was similar in those with a persistently patent artery and those with late reocclusion. Excessive anticoagulation did not appear to increase hemorrhagic risk except that access site-related hemorrhage was more common in patients with activated partial thromboplastin time greater than 100 s at 8 h.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The Role of Heparin in the Thrombolytic Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction

Objective:

To review the literature to determine the most appropriate role of heparin when using thrombolytic therapy.

Data Sources:

English-language journal articles published between 1985 and 1991.

Study Selection:

Ten trials comparing the effects of thrombolytic therapy with and without heparin. Desired outcomes that the authors were interested in were coronary vessel patency, reocclusion, recurrent ischemia, reinfarction, mortality, and bleeding complications.

Data Extraction:

Studies were assessed based on methodology.

Data Synthesis:

The concurrent use of heparin with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) enhances coronary vessel patency without significantly increasing the risk of bleeding complications. The concurrent use of heparin with streptokinase enhances survival; however, the risk of bleeding associated with heparin use is unclear at present. Data are not currently available for anistreplase. Studies are underway to further address the role of heparin with thrombolytic therapy.

Conclusions:

Based on data currently available, it appears that beginning intravenous heparin during the first hour of the tPA infusion and continuing heparin for 24 hours appears most appropriate and has a minimal risk of bleeding. Delaying heparin for 9–12 hours after the streptokinase infusion appears to produce clinical benefits; however, it is not clear whether these benefits outweigh the potential risks of bleeding.

Effects of aspirin on coronary reocclusion and recurrent ischemia after thrombolysis: a meta-analysis

Reocclusion of infarct-related coronary arteries within 2 weeks of thrombolytic therapy varies from 5% to 45% and neither clinical nor angiographic variables have been proved to be predictive of reocclusion. The goal of the present study was to evaluate whether aspirin could prevent coronary reocclusion and recurrent ischemia after thrombolysis. For this purpose, a meta-analysis including 32 studies was performed. Although the studies showed very similar demographic data, the reocclusion rate assessed by angiography in 419 patients treated with aspirin was 11% compared with 25% in 513 patients without aspirin therapy (p less than 0.001). Recurrent ischemic events were present in 25% of 2,977 patients treated with aspirin and 41% of 721 patients treated without aspirin (p less than 0.001). The effect of aspirin was similar in trials with either streptokinase or recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA). Thus, aspirin in the presence of heparin might prevent coronary reocclusion after thrombolysis.

Plasma fibrinopeptide A levels in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with alteplase. Correlation with concomitant heparin, coronary artery patency, and recurrent ischemia. The European Cooperative Study Group

BACKGROUND

Fibrin generation during and after therapy with alteplase may depend on the level of concomitant anticoagulation. The hypothesis that fibrinopeptide A (FPA) levels, as markers of ongoing in vivo fibrin formation, correlate with the angiographic and clinical outcome of thrombolysis is tested.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Serial plasma FPA levels were determined in 334 patients of the randomized European Cooperative Study Group trial comparing heparin versus placebo plus alteplase and aspirin in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Median FPA levels (with the 10th to 90th percentiles) were 21 ng/ml (2-390 ng/ml) before treatment in placebo-allocated patients (n = 166) and increased to 49 (15-580), 34 (4-320), 27 (2-240), 29 (2-430), and 30 (3-390) ng/ml after 0.75, 3, 12, 24, and 36 hours, respectively. In heparin-allocated patients (n = 168), median baseline FPA values were 18 ng/ml (2-210 ng/ml) and decreased to 6 (1-110), 5 (1-75), 5 (1-60), 7 (1-100), and 10 (1-170) ng/ml at corresponding time points (p less than 0.0001 for the difference at each time point). Adequate anticoagulation, defined as no activated partial thromboplastin time value below twice the pretreatment value at 3, 12, 24, and 36 hours after initiation of treatment, was obtained in 48 patients assigned to heparin. It was associated with normal median FPA levels (less than or equal to 4 ng/ml) at all time points compared with 12 (2-80), 16 (2-240), and 15 (2-240) ng/ml at 12, 24, and 36 hours, respectively, in heparin-assigned but inadequately anticoagulated patients (n = 102, p less than 0.001 for each time point). In the heparin-treated group, median FPA values tended to be lower at all time points in patients with patent vessels than in patients with occluded arteries, but the difference was significant only at 24 hours (p = 0.04). FPA levels did not correlate with clinically apparent recurrent ischemia or with left ventricular thrombosis on two-dimensional echocardiography.

CONCLUSIONS

During and after thrombolytic therapy with alteplase, the enhanced fibrin generation is suppressed by sustained concomitant anticoagulation with intravenous heparin. Adequate anticoagulation warrants individual titration of the heparin dose. High plasma FPA levels 24 hours after alteplase therapy are specific but insensitive markers of vessel occlusion in anticoagulated patients. They do not correlate with clinical outcome.

Thrombin antagonists and antiplatelet agents

The clinical benefits of thrombolytic therapy for the treatment of myocardial infarction are recognized widely. However, 2 major limiting factors have become evident: (1) 20-25% of coronary arterial thrombi are resistant to lysis; and (2) coronary reocclusion occurs in 10-15% of patients. There is increasing evidence that both phenomena are caused by heightened procoagulant activity localized primarily at the site of atheromatous plaque rupture. Thrombin, the pivotal enzyme in all coagulation processes, is activated, stimulating fibrin formation and platelet aggregation. Platelet activation, by thrombin- and nonthrombin-mediated mechanisms, occurs as well, further increasing thrombotic tendency. Thus, a potent and well-localized procoagulant state may be continuously amplified, increasing both during and frequently after thrombolytic therapy. Current treatment strategies are designed to enhance fibrinolytic and anticoagulant activity, while neutralizing the expression of procoagulant factors. Thrombin antagonism and platelet inhibition, primarily with heparin and aspirin, respectively, form the mainstay of conjunctive therapy. Their benefits have been recognized, decreasing thromboembolic events and patient mortality. However, intrinsic limitations suggest that more potent and selective agents will be required to overcome effectively the problems of thrombolytic resistance and coronary reocclusion. In experimental models, specific thrombin antagonists and antiplatelet agents have shown superiority over heparin and aspirin. Further investigation to define the overall safety and efficacy profile of these newer agents will be required, however, prior to their widescale implementation in clinical practice.

A comparison of five devices for the bedside monitoring of heparin therapy

Five instruments were tested for their capacity to monitor heparin therapy on whole blood at the bedside. The instruments were 512 Coagulation Monitor (Ciba-Corning), Thrombotrack (Nycomed), Automated Coagulation Timer (Hemotec), Hemochron-ACT and Hemochron-APTT (International Technidyne Corporation). Fifty subjects with various levels of heparinisation were tested on each instrument and were also assayed for antithrombin III, fibrinogen, haematocrit, platelet count and plasma heparin level. The results were compared with a reference APTT performed on the Automated Coagulation Laboratory 300R (Instrumentation Laboratories). The Hemochron-ACT correlated least well. The Hemotec and Thrombotrack were unsuitable in a clinical setting because of pipetting requirements, although the Thrombotrack did correlate well with the reference parameters. The 512 Coagulation Monitor was the simplest to use, but its maximum response corresponded to the midpoint of the reference APTT therapeutic range. The Hemochron-APTT was simple to use, had an adequate response range and correlated well with reference parameters.

Comparison of intravenous urokinase plus heparin versus heparin alone in acute myocardial infarction. Urochinasi per via Sistemica nell'Infarto Miocardico (USIM) Collaborative Group

In a randomized trial of the effects on in-hospital mortality of intravenous urokinase plus heparin versus heparin alone, 2,531 patients with acute myocardial infarction in 89 coronary care units were enrolled for greater than 30 months. Patients admitted within 4 hours of the onset of pain were randomized to receive either intravenous urokinase (a bolus dose of 1 million U repeated after 60 minutes) plus heparin (a bolus dose of 10,000 U followed by 1,000 IU/hour for 48 hours) or heparin alone (infused at the same rate). Complete data were obtained in 2,201 patients (1,128 taking urokinase and 1,073 taking heparin). At 16 days, overall hospital mortality was 8% in the urokinase and 8.3% in the heparin group (p = not significant). Among patients with anterior infarction, mortality was 10.3% in the urokinase and 13.9% in the heparin group (p = 0.09; relative risk = 0.73). The incidence of major bleeding (urokinase 0.44%, heparin 0.37%) as well as the overall incidence of stroke (urokinase 0.35%, heparin 0.20%) was similar in the 2 groups. The rates of major in-hospital cardiac complications (reinfarction, postinfarction angina) were also similar.

A randomized comparison of intravenous heparin with oral aspirin and dipyridamole 24 hours after recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator for acute myocardial infarction. National Heart Foundation of Australia Coronary Thrombolysis Group

BACKGROUND

This study addressed the need for heparin administration to be continued for more than 24 hours after coronary thrombolysis with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA).

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 241 patients with acute myocardial infarction were treated with 100 mg rt-PA and a bolus of 5,000 units i.v. heparin followed by 1,000 units/hr i.v. heparin for 24 hours. At 24 hours, 202 patients were randomized to continue intravenous heparin therapy (n = 99) in full dosage or to discontinue heparin therapy and begin an oral antiplatelet regimen of aspirin (300 mg/day) and dipyridamole (300 mg/day) (n = 103). On prospective recording, there were no differences in the pattern of chest pain, reinfarction, or bleeding complications. Coronary angiography on cardiac catheterization at 7-10 days showed no differences in patency of the infarct-related artery. The proportion of patients with total occlusion (TIMI grade 0-1) of the infarct-related artery was 18.9% in the heparin group and 19.8% in the aspirin and dipyridamole group. In the patients with an incompletely occluded infarct-related artery, the lumen was reduced by 69 +/- 2% of normal in the heparin group and 67 +/- 2% in the aspirin and dipyridamole group. Left ventricular function assessed on cardiac catheterization and radionuclide study at day 2 and at 1 month showed no differences between the two groups. Left ventricular ejection fraction on radionuclide ventriculography at 1 month was 52.4 +/- 1.2% in the heparin group and 51.9 +/- 1.2% in the aspirin and dipyridamole group.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that heparin therapy can be discontinued 24 hours after rt-PA therapy and replaced with an oral antiplatelet regimen without any adverse effects on chest pain, reinfarction, coronary patency, or left ventricular function.

Heparin as an adjunctive treatment after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction

The rationale for considering heparin therapy as an adjunct to thrombolytic treatment for patients with acute myocardial infarction is to prevent rethrombosis after successful thrombolysis. The risk of reocclusion is high immediately after thrombolysis because blood flowing through the newly opened coronary artery is exposed to thrombin bound to fibrin in the residual thrombus. Clinical studies of patients with venous thrombosis and acute myocardial infarction indicate that there is a relation between the anticoagulant response to heparin and clinical efficacy and that the concept of a therapeutic heparin level is valid. Subcutaneous doses of approximately 15,000 U twice a day fail to provide an adequate anticoagulant response at 24 hours in the majority of patients, whereas intravenous administration of a bolus of 5,000 U followed by continuous infusion of 30,000 U per 24 hours produces an adequate anticoagulant response at 24 hours in approximately 80% of patients. Studies of patients with myocardial infarction who received streptokinase showed a significant beneficial effect on mortality when 12,500 U of heparin was administered subcutaneously 2 times per day. In contrast, the single largest study evaluating heparin 12,500 U administered subcutaneously 2 times per day as an adjunct to recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) treatment did not show a beneficial effect on mortality. However, studies using full-dose intravenous heparin therapy demonstrated that heparin improves patency after coronary thrombolysis with rt-PA.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effect of heparin on coronary arterial patency after thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction

Infarct artery patency rates at 90 minutes after coronary thrombolysis using recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) with and without concurrent heparin anticoagulation have been shown to be comparable. The contribution of heparin to efficacy and safety after thrombolysis with rt-PA is unknown. In this pilot study, 84 patients were treated within 6 hours of onset of acute myocardial infarction (mean of 2.7 hours) with the standard dose of 100 mg of rt-PA over 3 hours. Forty-two patients were randomized to receive additionally immediate intravenous heparin anticoagulation (5,000 U of intravenous bolus followed by 1,000 U/hour titrated to a partial thromboplastin time of 1.5 to 2.0 times control) while 42 patients received rt-PA alone. Coronary angiography performed on day 3 (48 to 72 hours, mean 57) after rt-PA therapy revealed infarct artery patency rates of 71 and 43% in anticoagulated and control patients, respectively (p = 0.015). Recurrent ischemia or infarction, or both, occurred in 3 (7.1%) anticoagulated patients and 5 (11.9%) control patients (difference not significant). Mild, moderate and severe bleeding occurred in 52, 10 and 2% of the group receiving anticoagulation, respectively, and 34, 2 and 0% of patients in the control group, respectively (p = 0.006). These data indicate that after rt-PA therapy of acute myocardial infarction, heparin therapy is associated with substantially higher coronary patency rates 3 days after thrombolysis but is accompanied by an increased incidence of minor bleeding complications.

Management of the patient following coronary thrombolysis

Myocardial salvage can be maximized by the early institution of thrombolytic therapy and aspirin. Certain patients may benefit from the administration of intravenous heparin, beta blockers, or nitroglycerin. The routine use of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) or calcium-channel blockers does not appear to be warranted. Recurrent myocardial ischemia should be vigorously treated with medical therapy and there may be value in cardiac catheterization, followed by PTCA or bypass surgery, depending upon the extent of myocardium at risk and the underlying coronary anatomy. Long-term morbidity and mortality may be reduced by instituting aspirin and beta blockers as well as by modifying risk factors. There is no evidence for the long-term benefit from any calcium-channel blocker. Oral anticoagulation may be warranted in those patients with a mural thrombus, congestive heart failure, or atrial fibrillation. ACE inhibitors may be of value in the presence of left ventricular dysfunction and certainly in the presence of symptomatic congestive heart failure. Antiarrhythmic therapy is generally indicated only for symptomatic or life-threatening arrhythmias. Residual myocardial ischemia should be sought by exercise testing, and those patients with poor exercise tolerance generally warrant cardiac catheterization in consideration for revascularization.

Partial resistance to anticoagulation after streptokinase treatment for acute myocardial infarction

This study examines the response of 3 different groups of patients to anticoagulants: 50 patients previously treated with streptokinase for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (group 1), 24 patients with AMI who had received anticoagulants without prior thrombolysis (group 2) and 11 subjects who received anticoagulants for noncoronary indications (group 3). No significant differences were detected between groups 2 and 3; therefore, they were combined for analysis. After streptokinase, patients required 37,755 +/- 1,516 (mean +/- standard error of the mean) U of heparin per day to achieve the desired activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). The dosage was 30,294 +/- 1,089 U/day in patients without antecedent thrombolysis (p less than 0.001). Group 1 patients required 5 +/- 0.4 days until adequate anticoagulation was achieved, compared with 3 +/- 0.2 days in the control group (p = 0.01). Despite higher heparin requirements, group 1 patients had a lower APTT value than the other subjects (87 +/- 5 vs 101 +/- 6 seconds, p = 0.08). Group 1 patients required 5 +/- 0.3 days to reach anticoagulation with warfarin versus 4 +/- 0.2 days in groups 2 + 3 (p = 0.05). Comparison of groups 1 and 2 yielded similar, although smaller, differences. Patients treated with streptokinase for AMI seem to be partially resistant to anticoagulation, which may increase the risk of reocclusion.

Heparin and infarct coronary artery patency after streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction

Anticoagulant therapy is frequently used after thrombolytic agents in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) although it is unclear that such therapy will prevent subsequent infarct vessel reocclusion. The role of duration of heparin therapy in maintaining infarct artery patency was studied retrospectively in 53 consecutive AMI patients who received streptokinase therapy and underwent coronary angiography acutely and at 14 +/- 1 days. Of the 39 patients with initial infarct vessel patency, patency at follow-up angiography was observed in 100% (22 of 22) of those who received greater than or equal to 4 days of intravenous heparin but in only 59% (10 of 17) of those patients who received less than 4 days of heparin (p less than 0.05). Of the 14 patients not initially recanalized after streptokinase, patent infarct-related arteries at follow-up angiography were found in 3 of 8 (38%) treated with greater than or equal to 4 days of heparin therapy but in none of the 6 patients treated for less than 4 days (difference not significant). No significant difference in hemorrhagic complications was noted between the short- and long-term heparin treatment groups. Thus, greater than or equal to 4 days of intravenous heparin therapy after successful streptokinase therapy in AMI is more effective in maintaining short-term infarct vessel patency than a shorter duration of therapy and it may maintain the short-term patency of the infarct vessel in those patients who later spontaneously recanalize.