Effects of early captopril administration on infarct expansion, left ventricular remodeling and exercise capacity after acute myocardial infarction

Mechanisms for the development of heart failure and improvement of cardiac function by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, which prevent the conversion of angiotensin I to angiotensin II, are well-known for the treatments of cardiovascular diseases, such as heart failure, hypertension and acute coronary syndrome. Several of these inhibitors including captopril, enalapril, ramipril, zofenopril and imidapril attenuate vasoconstriction, cardiac hypertrophy and adverse cardiac remodeling, improve clinical outcomes in patients with cardiac dysfunction and decrease mortality. Extensive experimental and clinical research over the past 35 years has revealed that the beneficial effects of ACE inhibitors in heart failure are associated with full or partial prevention of adverse cardiac remodeling. Since cardiac function is mainly determined by coordinated activities of different subcellular organelles, including sarcolemma, sarcoplasmic reticulum, mitochondria and myofibrils, for regulating the intracellular concentration of Ca2+ and myocardial metabolism, there is ample evidence to suggest that adverse cardiac remodelling and cardiac dysfunction in the failing heart are the consequence of subcellular defects. In fact, the improvement of cardiac function by different ACE inhibitors has been demonstrated to be related to the attenuation of abnormalities in subcellular organelles for Ca2+-handling, metabolic alterations, signal transduction defects and gene expression changes in failing cardiomyocytes. Various ACE inhibitors have also been shown to delay the progression of heart failure by reducing the formation of angiotensin II, the development of oxidative stress, the level of inflammatory cytokines and the occurrence of subcellular defects. These observations support the view that ACE inhibitors improve cardiac function in the failing heart by multiple mechanisms including the reduction of oxidative stress, myocardial inflammation and Ca2+-handling abnormalities in cardiomyocytes.

Coenzyme Q10 Modulates Remodeling Possibly by Decreasing Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome

The study aims to examine the effects of coenzyme Q10, (a bioenergetic antioxidant), on the indexes of left ventricular remodeling, oxidative damage, and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) level after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with left ventricular dysfunction. In a double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel group study (a retrospective analysis of an earlier trial) in 55 patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <50% after AMI, the effects of coenzyme Q10 (120 mg/day) or placebo were studied for 24 weeks. Two-dimensional echocardiography was performed at discharge, (approximately 5–10 days after admission) and at 6 months after AMI. The results revealed that wall thickness opposite the site of infarction decreased from (mean ± standard deviation (SD)) 12.2 ± 2.0 mm to 10.0 ± 1.8 mm with coenzyme Q10 compared with 12.8 ± 2.2 mm to 13.3 ± 2.3 mm with placebo (p < 0.01). Left ventricular mass changed from 236 ± 72 g to 213 ± 61 g with coenzyme Q10 compared with 230 ± 77 g to 255 ± 86 g with placebo (p < 0.01). Treatment with coenzyme Q10 also prevented alteration of sphericity index which is a ratio of the long and short axis of the left ventricle (which changed from 1.61 ± 0.28 to 1.63 ± 0.30 with coenzyme Q10 compared with 1.61 ± 0.32 to 1.41 ± 0.31 with placebo (p < 0.05)). Coenzyme Q10 also prevented alteration of the wall thickening abnormality at the infarct site, which changed from 9.4 ± 3.0 cm² to 9.1 ± 2.8 cm² compared with 10.1 ± 3.1 to 13.7 ± 4.2 cm² with placebo (p < 0.05). End diastolic and systolic volumes also showed significant reduction with coenzyme Q10 compared to placebo. The serum level of ACE showed significant decline in the coenzyme Q10 group compared to the control group. Treatment with coenzyme Q10 early after AMI causes attenuation of left ventricular remodeling and decreases the serum ACE level in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.

Prevention of remodeling in congestive heart failure due to myocardial infarction by blockade of the renin–angiotensin system

Ventricular remodeling subsequent to myocardial infarction (MI) is a complex process and is considered to be a major determinant of the clinical course of congestive heart failure (CHF). Emerging evidence suggests that activation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) plays an important role in post-MI ventricular remodeling; however, it is becoming clear that this is one of several neurohumoral systems that are activated in CHF. Blockade of RAS by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists attenuates the ventricular dysfunction, but the effects of individual drugs in reducing the morbidity and mortality in CHF patients are variable. Furthermore, there is a difference of opinion as to the time of initiation of therapy with RAS blockers after the onset of MI. Since blockade of RAS partially improves cardiac function, it is suggested that a combination therapy involving RAS blockers (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists) and agents that affect other neurohumoral systems may prove useful for improved treatment of CHF. Although activation of RAS has been shown to promote oxidative stress in experimental studies, the use of antioxidant therapy in CHF patients is controversial. Recent experimental studies have shown that ventricular remodeling in CHF is associated with remodeling of subcellular organelles such as sarcolemma, sarcoplasmic reticulum, myofibrils and extracellular matrix in terms of their molecular structure and composition. Since attenuation of remodeling in one and/or more subcellular organelles by different agents may prevent the progression of CHF, it is a challenge to develop specific drugs affecting molecular mechanisms associated with subcellular remodeling for the improved therapy of CHF.

Should all patients at high cardiovascular risk receive renin-angiotensin system blockers?

Despite considerable advances in preventative treatment during the last two decades, the increasing burden of cardiovascular (CV) disease constitutes an urgent need for new therapeutic strategies to reduce CV mortality and morbidity in patients at high CV risk. Activation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) results in vasoconstrictive, proliferative and pro-inflammatory effects that contribute to the development of atherosclerosis. As a result, the RAS is implicated at all stages of the 'CV continuum' that links risk factors such as hypertension and dyslipidaemia with major CV events, congestive heart failure (CHF) and CV death. The RAS therefore represents a rational and ideal therapeutic target in CV risk reduction strategies. Both angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) have been shown to promote beneficial effects on end-organ damage, such as decreases in arterial stiffness and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). Several trials have shown that ACE inhibitors and ARBs reduce CV risk in patients with specific risk factors. Furthermore, the HOPE study and, more recently, the ONTARGET® study have shown that ramipril and telmisartan reduce CV risk in patients with a high CV risk profile across the 'CV continuum'. Telmisartan is the first ARB to demonstrate CV prevention in patients at high CV risk, similar to that of the gold-standard ACE inhibitor, ramipril. This extensive clinical trial evidence suggests that ACE inhibitors or ARBs should be part of the standard treatment for patients at risk of CV events. ARBs may represent a preferred option due to their unsurpassed tolerability.

Effect of early treatment with anti-hypertensive drugs on short and long-term mortality in patients with an acute cardiovascular event

BACKGROUND

Acute cardiovascular events represent a therapeutic challenge. Blood pressure lowering drugs are commonly used and recommended in the early phase of these settings. This review analyses randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence for this approach.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of immediate and short-term administration of anti-hypertensive drugs on all-cause mortality, total non-fatal serious adverse events (SAE) and blood pressure, in patients with an acute cardiovascular event, regardless of blood pressure at the time of enrollment.

SEARCH STRATEGY

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane clinical trial register from Jan 1966 to February 2009 were searched. Reference lists of articles were also browsed. In case of missing information from retrieved articles, authors were contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing anti-hypertensive drug with placebo or no treatment administered to patients within 24 hours of the onset of an acute cardiovascular event.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Fixed effects model with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used. Sensitivity analyses were also conducted.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty-five RCTs (N=166,206) were included, evaluating four classes of anti-hypertensive drugs: ACE inhibitors (12 trials), beta-blockers (20), calcium channel blockers (18) and nitrates (18). Acute stroke was studied in 6 trials (all involving CCBs). Acute myocardial infarction was studied in 59 trials. In the latter setting immediate nitrate treatment (within 24 hours) reduced all-cause mortality during the first 2 days (RR 0.81, 95%CI [0.74,0.89], p<0.0001). No further benefit was observed with nitrate therapy beyond this point. ACE inhibitors did not reduce mortality at 2 days (RR 0.91,95%CI [0.82, 1.00]), but did after 10 days (RR 0.93, 95%CI [0.87,0.98] p=0.01). No other blood pressure lowering drug administered as an immediate treatment or short-term treatment produced a statistical significant mortality reduction at 2, 10 or >/=30 days. There was not enough data studying acute stroke, and there were no RCTs evaluating other acute cardiovascular events.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Nitrates reduce mortality (4-8 deaths prevented per 1000) at 2 days when administered within 24 hours of symptom onset of an acute myocardial infarction. No mortality benefit was seen when treatment continued beyond 48 hours. Mortality benefit of immediate treatment with ACE inhibitors post MI at 2 days did not reach statistical significance but the effect was significant at 10 days (2-4 deaths prevented per 1000). There is good evidence for lack of a mortality benefit with immediate or short-term treatment with beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers for acute myocardial infarction.

Effects of early captopril therapy after myocardial infarction on the incidence of late potentials

BACKGROUND

Late potentials (LP) on signal-averaged electrocardiography (SAECG), recorded 6 to 30 days after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI), identify patients at risk for late arrhythmic events. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have been shown to reduce ventricular remodeling and cardiovascular mortality after AMI.

HYPOTHESIS

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of early (< 24 h) administration of captopril on the presence of LP on Days 6-30 after AMI.

METHODS

The study included 117 patients with a first AMI; 63 patients (53 men and 10 women, aged 59 +/- 12 years), 35 with an anterior and 28 with an inferior AMI (44 thrombolyzed), received early captopril therapy. The control group consisted of 54 age-matched patients (39 men and 15 women, aged 60 +/- 12 years), 19 with an anterior and 35 with an inferior AMI (31 thrombolyzed, p = NS), who did not receive early therapy with an ACE inhibitor. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was similar in both groups (48 vs. 46%). Time domain analysis of SAECG was performed using a band-pass filter of 40-250 Hz. Late potentials were considered present if any two of three criteria were met: (1) Filtered QRS duration (QRSD) > 114 ms, (2) root-mean-square voltage of the last 40 ms of the QRS complex (RMS) < 20 microV, and (3) duration of low amplitude (< 40 microV) signal of the terminal portion of the QRS (LAS) > 38 ms.

RESULTS

In the two groups of patients there were no differences in mean values of SAECG parameters. No patient was receiving any antiarrhythmic drugs. In the captopril group LPs were present in 9 of 63 patients (14%) and in the control group in 17 of 54 patients (31%) (p = 0.046). There was no difference in the number of patients with a patent infarct-related artery in the two groups (76 vs. 59%).

CONCLUSION

Captopril treatment early after an AMI reduces the incidence of LPs recorded on Days 6-30 and may thus favorably affect the arrhythmogenic substrate.

A systematic review: Effect of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition on left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction in patients with a myocardial infarction and in patients with left ventricular dysfunction

BACKGROUND AND AIM

To summarize and quantify results of echocardiographic studies examining the effect of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition on left ventricular remodelling in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) and in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD).

METHODS

Systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of eligible studies providing data on end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were performed.

RESULTS

Data from 16 eligible studies were meta-analysed. The results of studies including patients with MI and preserved LVEF (>45%) showed no significant benefit of ACE inhibition. Results of studies/subgroups with mean LVEF < or =45% demonstrated significant differences in diastolic and systolic volumes of 3.0 (0.1, 6.0) ml and 2.25 (0.04, 4.4) ml in short-term (4-14 weeks) follow-up in favour of ACE inhibitor, p=0.041 and p=0.046 respectively. In the long-term (6-12 months) follow-up, the differences in diastolic and systolic volumes were 4.2 (0.98, 7.4) ml and 3.3 (0.9, 5.8) ml in favour of ACE inhibitor, p=0.01 and p=0.007 respectively. LVEF improved in both short and long-term follow-up, p=0.034 and p=0.021, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Chronic use of ACE inhibition has a small but sustained and beneficial effect on remodelling in patients with myocardial infarction and patients with chronic left ventricular dysfunction.

The revised role of ACE-inhibition after myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic/primary PCI era

Many studies have investigated the process of left ventricular (LV) dilatation and the effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors after myocardial infarction (MI). It has been generally accepted that progression of LV dilatation is a major predictor of heart failure and death after MI. Also, attenuation of LV dilatation is thought to be one of the main mechanisms by which ACE inhibitors (ACE-Is) produce their beneficial effects. However, evidence for this hypothesis came from studies that were performed before thrombolytic therapy and primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were routinely used after acute MI. Nowadays, reperfusion is obtained much more frequently and LV dilatation after MI has become less prevalent. Nevertheless, ACE-Is proved effective in reducing cardiac morbidity and mortality. Therefore, mechanisms other than attenuation of LV dilatation, such as anti-atherosclerotic effects or plaque stabilisation, may explain the long-term beneficial effects of ACE-Is after MI. In the present overview, we evaluate the role of LV dilatation and the effects of ACE-Is after MI in the thrombolytic/primary PCI era and provide recommendations on ACE-I use in clinical practice.

Influence of long-term treatment of imidapril on mortality, cardiac function, and gene expression in congestive heart failure due to myocardial infarction

Although it is generally accepted that the efficacy of imidapril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, in congestive heart failure (CHF) is due to improvement of hemodynamic parameters, the significance of its effect on gene expression for sarcolemma (SL) and sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) proteins has not been fully understood. In this study, we examined the effects of long-term treatment of imidapril on mortality, cardiac function, and gene expression for SL Na+/K+ATPase and Na+–Ca2+exchanger as well as SR Ca2+pump ATPase, Ca2+release channel (ryanodine receptor), phospholamban, and calsequestrin in CHF due to myocardial infarction. Heart failure subsequent to myocardial infarction was induced by occluding the left coronary artery in rats, and treatment with imidapril (1 mg·kg–1·day–1) was started orally at the end of 3 weeks after surgery and continued for 37 weeks. The animals were assessed hemody nam ically and the heart and lung were examined morphologically. Some hearts were immediately frozen at –70 °C for the isolation of RNA as well as SL and SR membranes. The mortality of imidapril-treated animals due to heart failure was 31% whereas that of the untreated heart failure group was 64%. Imidapril treatment improved cardiac performance, attenuated cardiac remodeling, and reduced morphological changes in the heart and lung. The depressed SL Na+/K+ATPase and increased SL Na+–Ca2+exchange activities as well as reduced SR Ca2+pump and SR Ca2+release activities in the failing hearts were partially prevented by imidapril. Although changes in gene expression for SL Na+/K+ATPase isoforms as well as Na+–Ca2+exchanger and SR phospholamban were attenuated by treatments with imidapril, no alterations in mRNA levels for SR Ca2+pump proteins and Ca2+release channels were seen in the untreated or treated rats with heart failure. These results suggest that the beneficial effects of imidapril in CHF may be due to improvements in cardiac performance and changes in SL gene expression.Key words: sarcolemmal Na+/K+ATPase, Na+–Ca2+exchange, sarcoplasmic reticulum, heart failure, ACE inhibition.

Influence of perindopril on left ventricular global performance during the early phase of inferior acute myocardial infarction: assessment by Tei index

The beneficial effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE inhibitors) on left ventricular (LV) function in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is widely known. However, controversy exists about their efficacy on patients with small infarcts and preserved LV systolic function. The aim of the present study was to detect the influence of the ACE-I perindopril on the global LV performance in patients with pure inferior AMI (AMI-I) using a Doppler-derived index (DI) that combines systolic and diastolic time intervals (Tei index). Our study included 40 patients with first AMI-I, mean age 60 years +/- 9.06 years (SD) and 24 age- and gender-matched normal patients who constituted the control group (COG). Patients were randomized into two groups to receive the conventional treatment of AMI-I (GCT) or the above therapy plus P (GP). Complete Doppler echocardiography (systolic and diastolic parameters), DI, and systolic blood pressure (SBP) were measured on the 8.07 +/- 1.16(SD) post-infarct day. The same examination was performed to COG. The DI was significantly lower in healthy patients(0.45 +/- 0.23)compared with the value in patients of either GP(0.56 +/- 0.03; P = 0.023)or GCT(0.78 +/- 0.05; P = 0.000). Moreover DI was higher in patients of GCT compared with that of GP(P = 0.000). In addition, perindopril administration decreased isovolumic relaxation time(IRT; 120.00 +/- 4.23 vs. 139.00 +/- 6.74; P = 0.006)and increased significantly ejection time (ET;274.25 +/- 7.35 vs. 253.50 +/- 7.68; P = 0.042). SBP in patients of GP was similar to that of GCT(120.5 +/- 2.85 mmHg vs. 112.5 +/- 3.49 mmHg; P = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Global LV function (DI) is impaired in patients with AMI-I. Administration of perindopril has a favorable impact on LV performance in patients with AMI-I, achieved through improvement of the diastolic function (IRT), which indirectly improves LV systolic function (ET, DI). This beneficial influence of perindopril is the result of the direct tissue effect of the drug and not its hemodynamic action.

Heart failure: a hemodynamic disorder complicated by maladaptive proliferative responses

Heart failure has traditionally been viewed as a hemodynamic syndrome characterized by fluid retention, high venous pressure, and low cardiac output. Over the past decade, however, it has become clear that because of deterioration and progressive dilatation (remodeling) of the diseased heart, this is also a rapidly fatal syndrome. The importance of prognosis came to be appreciated when clinical trials showed that therapy which initially improves such functional abnormalities, as high venous pressure and low cardiac output, often fail to improve survival, and that some drugs which improve hemodynamics worsen long-term prognosis. The latter is true for most vasodilators which, in spite of alleviating the adverse short-term consequences of high afterload, shorten survival. Notable exceptions are ACE inhibitors, whose vasodilator effects do not explain their ability to prolong survival; instead, these drugs slow both deterioration and remodeling of the failing heart. Inotropic agents, while providing immediate relief of symptoms, generally shorten long-term survival, whereas beta-blockers slow deterioration and remodeling, and reduce mortality. Aldosterone antagonists exert beneficial effects on prognosis that are not easily explained by their diuretic effects, but instead can be explained by their ability to inhibit signaling pathways that stimulate maladaptive hypertrophy, remodeling, apoptosis and other deleterious responses that cause deterioration of the failing heart. These and other findings demonstrate that heart failure is more than a hemodynamic disorder; these patients suffer from maladaptive proliferative responses that cause cardiac cell death and progressive dilatation that play a key role in determining the poor prognosis in this syndrome.

Approaches to statistical analysis of repeated echocardiographic measurements after myocardial infarction and its relation to heart failure: Application of a random-effects model

BACKGROUND

Extensive left ventricular (LV) dilatation after myocardial infarction (MI) is associated with increased heart failure risk.

AIMS

To investigate whether the power to demonstrate the relation between LV dilatation and heart failure depends on the method applied to predict LV dilatation after MI.

METHODS

A random-effects model and ANOVA model for repeated measurements (MANOVA) were applied to predict LV volume index during 1 year for 298 post-MI patients. Spearman correlation coefficients (r) were calculated and Cox regression analysis was used to calculate risk ratio's (RR).

RESULTS

LV volume indices were more accurately predicted by a random-effects model than by a MANOVA model (systolic/diastolic respectively r = 0.93/0.91 vs. r = 0.67/0.64). Furthermore, patients with high LV volume index as predicted by the random-effects model, had significantly increased heart failure risk (systolic RR 2.04 (95% CI: 1.31 to 3.17; P = 0.001), diastolic RR 1.80 (95% CI: 1.16 to 2.78; P = 0.007). Using the same data, MANOVA failed to demonstrate this relation significantly (systolic RR 1.77 (95% CI: 0.79 to 3.98; P = 0.16), diastolic RR 1.49 (95% CI: 0.68 to 3.30; P = 0.31).

CONCLUSION

When analyzing repeated measurement data, random-effect models are more powerful in detecting clinical relations than are MANOVA models, especially in the presence of missing values.

Proliferative signaling and disease progression in heart failure

Therapy for heart failure has traditionally been directed to such short-term functional abnormalities as low cardiac output, high filling pressures, and fluid retention. More recently, it has become clear that therapy must also inhibit the proliferative responses that contribute to the progressive deterioration of the failing heart. That heart failure is more than a hemodynamic disorder became apparent when clinical trials showed that drugs that improve such functional abnormalities as high venous pressure and low cardiac output failed to improve long-term prognosis. Most vasodilators, in spite of alleviating short-term problems caused by excessive afterload, increase long-term mortality; the notable exceptions are ACE inhibitors, the ability of which to prolong survival and inhibit remodeling can be attributed to inhibition of proliferative signaling. Other clinical trials showed that inotropic drugs, while providing immediate relief of symptoms, generally shorten long-term survival, whereas beta-adrenergic receptor blockers, which inhibit proliferative signaling by norepinephrine, improve prognosis. These findings can be explained by crossovers between functional and proliferative signaling, among the most important of which is the ability of neurohumoral mediators, such as norepinephrine and angiotensin II, to stimulate maladaptive hypertrophy, remodeling, apoptosis and other deleterious proliferative responses in the failing heart. The emerging understanding of the role of cytoskeletal and cell adhesion molecules in activating maladaptive proliferative responses suggests additional targets for therapy, and the rapid pace of discovery in molecular biology promises additional opportunities to inhibit this abnormal signaling, which causes progressive ventricular dilatation (remodeling) and cardiac cell death, now recognized to be major problems in this syndrome.

Effect of early treatment with captopril and metoprolol singly and together on postinfarction left ventricular remodeling

BACKGROUND

beta-Blockers improve clinical outcome after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), but few data are available on their effectiveness in preventing left ventricular remodeling. The aim of the study was to assess the relative effects of captopril, metoprolol, and their combination on left ventricular remodeling after uncomplicated AMI.

METHODS

Two hundred fifty consecutive patients with a first AMI were randomly allocated to receive for 6 months captopril (up to 75 mg/d, group 1), metoprolol (up to 200 mg/d, group 2), or both (group 3) starting within 24 hours from symptom onset. Of these, 130 patients (group 1, 46; group 2, 47; group 3, 37) completed the study; all patients underwent 2-dimensional echocardiography at baseline and after 2 weeks and 3 and 6 months from AMI.

RESULTS

At 6 months, in comparison with baseline values, left ventricular end-diastolic area index (LVEDI) significantly increased in group 3 (P =.013) and wall motion score index significantly decreased in group 1 (P =.038). At any follow-up evaluation, the covariance analysis showed significantly greater interval changes in LVEDI in group 3 than in group 1 (P =.0077 at 2 weeks, P =.0108 at 3 months, and P = 0.0155 at 6 months). No significant differences were observed between group 1 and group 2 and between group 2 and group 3.

CONCLUSIONS

After uncomplicated first AMI, early and long-term treatment with captopril alone attenuates left ventricular remodeling better than its combination with metoprolol. In the head-to-head captopril versus metoprolol therapy strategy comparison, captopril alone seems more effective in reducing postinfarction enlargement, but a definite difference was not demonstrated.

A remarkable medical story: benefits of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in cardiac patients

The development of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE inhibitors) has been one of the most remarkable stories in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors have several acute and sustained hemodynamic effects that are beneficial in the presence of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. They increase cardiac output and stroke volume and reduce systemic vascular resistance as well as pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. The hemodynamic benefits are associated with improvement in the signs and symptoms of congestive heart failure (CHF) as well as decreased mortality, regardless of the severity of CHF. In patients with asymptomatic LV dysfunction, therapy with ACE inhibitors prevented the development of CHF and reduced hospitalization and cardiovascular death. They also increase survival when administered early after an acute myocardial infarction (MI). Most recently, ACE inhibition was associated with improved clinical outcomes in a broad spectrum of high-risk patients with preserved LV function. The mechanism of ACE inhibitors benefits is multifactorial and includes prevention of progressive LV remodeling, prevention of sudden death and arrhythmogenicity and structural stability of the atherosclerotic process. Evidence suggests that ACE inhibitors are underutilized in patients with cardiovascular diseases. Efforts should be directed to prescribe ACE inhibitors to appropriate patients in target doses. It is reasonable to believe that ACE inhibitors have a class effect in the management of LV dysfunction with or without CHF and acute MI. Whether the same is true for ACE inhibitors in the prevention of ischemic events is not known yet.

Aspirin does not influence the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on left ventricular ejection fraction 3 months after acute myocardial infarction

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the possible interaction between chronic aspirin therapy and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients surviving an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Forty-two patients with reduced LVEF were recruited from the warfarin aspirin reinfarction study (WARIS-II), a randomized, open study comparing enteric coated aspirin (160 mg/d), warfarin (INR 2.8--4.2) and the combination of aspirin (75 mg/d) and warfarin (INR 2.0--2.5) on mortality, reinfarction and stroke after AMI. LVEF and relevant biochemical measurements were performed before discharge and after 3 months. The overall LVEF increased during the study period from median 35 to 39% (P<0.001). There was no difference between patients on aspirin and warfarin regarding the main end point, LVEF. Furthermore, neither endothelin-1 nor ANP showed significant differences between the treatment groups. A possible interaction between ACE-I and aspirin might theoretically lead to reduced levels of renin activity in patients on aspirin, but we did not find any such inter-group difference. In conclusion, we did not find evidence of interaction between ACE-I and low-dose aspirin.

Effects of early use of atenolol or captopril on infarct size and ventricular volume: A double-blind comparison in patients with anterior acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

beta-Blockers and ACE inhibitors reduce early mortality when either one is started in the first hours after myocardial infarction (MI). Considering the close correlation between morphological changes and prognosis, we aimed to investigate whether the benefit of both beta-blockers and ACE inhibitors might reside in a similar protective effect on infarct size or ventricular volume.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a randomized, double-blind comparison between early treatment with captopril or atenolol in 121 patients with acute anterior MI, both drugs showed a similar reduction in mean blood pressure. However, only the atenolol-treated patients showed a significant early reduction in heart rate. Infarct size, obtained from the perfusion defect in resting single photon emission imaging, was higher in captopril-treated patients than in atenolol-treated patients: 29.8+/-12% versus 20.8+/-12% (P:<0.01) by polar map and 28.3+/-13% versus 20.0+/-13% (P:<0.01) by tomography. Changes from baseline to 1 week and to 3 months in ventricular end-diastolic volume, assessed by echocardiography, were as follows: 58+/-14 versus 64+/-19 (P<0.05) and 65+/-21 mL/m(2) (P<0.05), respectively, with captopril, and 58+/-18 versus 64+/-18 (P<0.05) and 69+/-30 mL/m(2) (P<0.05), respectively, with atenolol. Neither group showed significant changes in end-systolic volume. Among patients with perfusion defect >18% (n=51), those treated with atenolol showed a significant increase of end-systolic and end-diastolic ventricular volumes, whereas captopril-treated patients did not.

CONCLUSIONS

Although early treatment with atenolol or captopril results in similar overall short- and medium-term preservation of ventricular function and volumes, in patients with larger infarctions, a beta-blocker alone does not adequately protect myocardium from ventricular dilatation.

Effect of very early angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on left ventricular dilation after myocardial infarction in patients receiving thrombolysis: results of a meta-analysis of 845 patients. FAMIS, CAPTIN and CATS Investigators

OBJECTIVES

We sought to investigate the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition <9 h after myocardial infarction (MI) on left ventricular (LV) dilation in patients receiving thrombolysis.

BACKGROUND

The ACE inhibitors reduce mortality after MI. Attenuation of LV dilation has been suggested as an important mechanism.

METHODS

The data of 845 patients with three-month echocardiographic follow-up after MI were combined from three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. The criteria for these studies included: 1) thrombolytic therapy; 2) ACE inhibition within 6 to 9 h; and 3) evaluation of LV dilation as the primary objective.

RESULTS

The ACE inhibitor was started 3.2+/-1.7 h after the patients' first (mainly, 85%) anterior MI. After three months, LV dilation was not significantly attenuated by very early treatment with an ACE inhibitor. The diastolic volume index was attenuated by 0.5 ml/m2 (95% confidence interval [CI] -1.5 to 2.5, p = 0.61), and the systolic volume index by 0.5 ml/m2 (95% CI -1.0 to 1.9, p = 0.50). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that LV dilation was significantly attenuated by ACE inhibitor treatment for patients in whom reperfusion failed. In contrast, LV dilation was almost unaffected by ACE inhibitor treatment in successfully reperfused patients.

CONCLUSIONS

We could not demonstrate attenuation of LV dilation in patients receiving thrombolysis by ACE inhibitor treatment within 6 to 9 h after MI. We speculate that very early treatment with an ACE inhibitor has a beneficial effect on LV remodeling only in patients in whom reperfusion failed. Other mechanisms may be responsible for the beneficial effects of ACE inhibitors in successfully reperfused patients after MI.

Early angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor therapy enhances the benefits of late coronary artery reperfusion on infarct expansion

BACKGROUND

Individually, both late reperfusion and early angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor treatment prevent infarct expansion after acute myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect and mechanism of early post-myocardial infarction ACE inhibitor treatment, when used in combination with late coronary artery reperfusion, on infarct expansion.

METHODS

Sprague-Dawley rats underwent 8 h of coronary occlusion followed by permanent reperfusion. The treatment group received enalapril, started 1 h after coronary occlusion and continued for 13 days. A control group received placebo. Two weeks after acute myocardial infarction, hemodynamic, morphometric and histologic analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Hemodynamic parameters were similar in both groups (P = NS). Infarct size was similar in the ACE inhibitor and placebo treatment groups (44 +/- 4% compared with 39 +/- 4%, P = NS). Septal thickness was also similar in the two groups (2.8 +/- 0.3 mm compared with 2.7 +/- 0.3 mm, P = NS). The ACE inhibitor-treated group had thicker infarcts than those in the placebo-treated group (0.93 +/- 0.07 mm compared with 0.76 +/- 0.04 mm, P < 0.05) and these infarcts were less expanded (expansion index 1.17 +/- 0.12 compared with 1.57 +/- 0.12, P < 0.05). ACE inhibitor treatment was associated with hypertrophy of viable myocytes within the scar compared with placebo treatment (cell diameter 11.1 +/- 0.5 microns compared with 8.9 +/- 0.4 microns, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Early post-myocardial infarction ACE inhibitor treatment enhances the benefits of late coronary reperfusion on infarct expansion. The benefits may be related to hypertrophy of still-viable myocytes within the infarcted zone.

Effect of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition on sudden cardiac death in patients following acute myocardial infarction. A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Estimate the effect of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors on the risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) following myocardial infarction (MI).

BACKGROUND

Trials in post-MI patients have shown that ACE inhibitor therapy reduces mortality. However, the effect on SCD as a mechanism has not been clarified.

METHODS

Trials of ACE inhibitor therapy following MI reported between January, 1978 and August, 1997 were identified. Studies were included if they met the following criteria: 1) randomized comparison of ACE inhibitor to placebo within 14 days of MI; 2) study duration/blinded follow-up of > or =6 weeks; 3) the number of deaths and modes of death were reported or could be obtained from the investigators.

RESULTS

We identified 374 candidate articles, of which 15 met the inclusion criteria. The 15 trials included 15,104 patients, 2,356 of whom died. Most (87%) fatalities were cardiovascular and 900 were SCDs. A significant reduction in SCD risk or a trend towards this was observed in all of the larger (N > 500) trials. Overall, ACE inhibitor therapy resulted in significant reductions in risk of death (random effects odds ratio [OR] = 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71-0.97), cardiovascular death (OR = 0.82; 95% CI 0.69-0.97) and SCD (OR = 0.80; 95% CI 0.70-0.92).

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis is consistent with prior reports showing that ACE inhibitors decrease the risk of death following a recent MI by reducing cardiovascular mortality. Moreover, this analysis suggests that a reduction in SCD risk with ACE inhibitors is an important component of this survival benefit.

Effects of early captopril administration after thrombolysis on regional wall motion in relation to infarct artery blood flow

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether early administration of captopril lessens infarct zone regional wall motion abnormalities when infarct artery blood flow is abnormal.

BACKGROUND

The interaction between angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor therapy, ventricular function and infarct artery blood flow has not been well described.

METHODS

A total of 493 patients aged < or = 75 years with first infarctions, presenting within 4 h of symptom onset, were randomized to receive 6.25 mg captopril, increasing to 50 mg t.d.s. or a matching placebo 2.1+/-0.4 h after commencing intravenous streptokinase (1.5 x 10(6) U over 30 to 60 min). Trial therapy was stopped 48 h prior to angiography at 3 weeks, to determine regional wall motion and infarct artery flow.

RESULTS

There were no differences in ejection fractions or end-systolic volumes between patients randomized to receive captopril and those randomized to receive a placebo. Among patients with anterior infarction (n = 216), randomization to captopril resulted in fewer hypokinetic chords (40+/-13; vs. 44+/-13; p=0.028) and a trend toward fewer chords >2 SD below normal (26+/-17 vs. 30+/-17; p=0.052) in the infarct zone. In patients randomized to receive captopril who had anterior infarction and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 0-2, flow there were fewer hypokinetic chords (44+/-12 vs. 50+/-9; p=0.043) and a trend toward fewer chords >2 SD below normal (33+/-15 vs. 39+/-13; p=0.057). Patients receiving captopril who had anterior infarction and corrected TIMI frame counts > 27 had fewer hypokinetic chords (42+/-13 vs. 46+/-12; p=0.015) and fewer chords >2 SD below normal (27+/-17 vs. 32+/-17; p= 0.047). Captopril had no effect in patients with inferior infarction. There were 20 late cardiac deaths (median follow-up 4 years) in the captopril group and 35 in the placebo group (p=0.036).

CONCLUSIONS

Randomization to receive captopril 2 h after streptokinase improved regional wall motion at 3 weeks. The greatest benefit was seen in patients with anterior infarction particularly when infarct artery blood flow is reduced.

Left ventricular dilatation after myocardial infarction: ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, or both?

Left ventricular (LV) dilatation after myocardial infarction (MI) is a major predictor of prognosis and identifies which patients will develop heart failure. Left ventricular dilatation or remodeling starts immediately after MI and progresses in the chronic phase of heart failure. Factors influencing remodeling, such as infarct size and neurohumoral activation, including the sympathetic and renin-angiotensin system, are discussed. Remodeling can be affected by reduction of infarct size and inhibition of neurohumoral activation. The effect of thrombolysis, beta-blockade, and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition in the acute phase after MI and in the chronic phase of heart failure on remodeling are discussed. On the basis of beneficial effects of ACE inhibition and beta-blockade in acute MI and in chronic heart failure, a treatment strategy is proposed in which both ACE inhibition and beta-blockade are started early after MI. Depending on infarct size and ventricular function, continued treatment in the chronic phase of heart failure must be considered.

The Effects of Sublingual Administration of Captopril on Parameters of Exercise Test and Neurohormonal Activation in Patients With Stable Angina Pectoris

A prospective randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled study was designed to investigate the effects of sublingual administration of captopril on the parameters of exercise test and neurohormonal activation in patients with stable angina pectoris. A total of 31 patients (28 male, 3 female; mean age 55.4 +/- 9.4 years) took part in the study. Coronary angiography and left ventriculography were performed in all cases and the patients were classified according to the ejection fraction (EF). Following sublingual placebo or 25 mg captopril, plasma levels of renin, angiotensin II, norepinephrine, and serum aldosterone levels were measured at rest and maximal exercise. test was performed. Hormone levels were remeasured immediately after the exercise. The same procedure was repeated the next day using captopril or placebo. Sublingual captopril administration increased the time to angina, the time to 1 mm ST depression, maximal exercise capacity, maximal exercise duration and decreased maximal ST depression, maximal systolic blood pressure, and maximal double product (p < 0.001-0.01). After the maximal exercise test following captopril, the % difference of angiotensin II, aldosterone, and norepinephrine levels was found to be significant lower and the % difference of the renin level was found to be significantly higher than those of placebo (p < 0.001). The effects of sublingual captopril on exercise parameters were additionally assessed in different left ventricular systolic function subgroups. The favorable effects were more prominent in cases with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. There were no adverse effects related to sublingual captopril use. As a result, sublingual administration of captopril improved the parameters of maximal exercise test and suppressed the neurohormonal activation during exercise. We suggest that sublingual captopril may be used effectively before planned daily activities in patients with stable angina pectoris.

Natural course of angiographic parameters after myocardial infarction: an evaluation in the prethrombolytic and pre-angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition era

BACKGROUND

After myocardial infarction, left ventricular dilation is a frequent cause of cardiac insufficiency, which is associated with high morbidity and mortality. In this angiographic study, the natural course of postinfarction ventricular dilation could be followed up because patients undergoing revascularization procedures were excluded and only some few patients received angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Of 85 patients suffering from angina after myocardial infarction, 59 could be examined twice by angiocardiography in a mean interval of 52 +/- 14 months; 37 of the 59 patients had sustained posterior myocardial infarction, 20 had anterior myocardial infarction, and 2 had both. During follow-up, end-diastolic volume index increased from 100 +/- 27 mL/m2 to 110 +/- 34 mL/m2; in 26 of the 59 patients the increase was greater than 15 mL/m2. Irrespective of the time since infarction, patients with an end-diastolic volume index greater than 100 mL/m2 and an ejection fraction less than 50% at the time of first angiography were at high risk of progressive ventricular dilation and further deterioration of left ventricular function (for both, P = .003). This process was independent of extent of coronary artery involvement and coronary disease progression. Multivariate analysis identified ejection fraction at the time of index angiography as the strongest predictor of further left ventricular dilation (P = .0004).

CONCLUSIONS

Continuing left ventricular dilation occurs in less than half the patients who had myocardial infarction. Left ventricular ejection fraction is the most sensitive parameter to predict the risk of ventricular dilation after infarction.

Electrocardiographic Changes and Mortality Due to Myocardial Infarction in Rats With or Without Imidapril Treatment

BACKGROUND: Various angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are known to improve heart function and prolong survival in patients and animals after myocardial infarction. Because myocardial infarction is known to induce arrhythmias, this study tested the hypothesis that early treatment with the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor imidapril reduces mortality during acute myocardial infarction because of protective effects against arrhythmogenesis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Rats were randomly divided into four groups: sham control, myocardial infarction, sham plus imidapril, and myocardial infarction plus imidapril. Myocardial infarction was produced by ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Treated rats received imidapril (1 mg/kg/day) through a gastric tube beginning 1 hour after coronary occlusion; control rats received tap water. Electrocardiogram (ECGs) were recorded 1, 3, 7, and 21 days postocclusion. Infarct size and scar weight were determined at 21 days in the myocardial infarction groups with and without imidapril treatment. ECGs of untreated rats showed ST-segment changes, abnormal Q waves, premature ventricular complexes, and QT(c) prolongation 1-21 days after coronary occlusion. Total mortality in 21 days averaged 35% in untreated rats; mortality within 48 hours was 30%. On the other hand, imidapril-treated rats showed fewer ST-segment changes, fewer abnormal Q waves, and a decreased incidence of premature ventricular complexes after coronary occlusion; the ST-segment and QT(c) interval returned to basal values within 1 week after occlusion. Imidapril treatment did not affect the ECG pattern in sham-treated control animals. Total mortality in the imidapril-treated group in 21 days after infarction was 22.5%; mortality within 48 hours was 20% (P <.05 compared with the untreated infarction group). Infarct size and scar weight caused by coronary occlusion did not differ in the untreated and imidapril-treated groups. CONCLUSIONS: Early treatment with imidapril markedly decreases mortality in rats after acute myocardial infarction. The lower mortality is not associated with a decrease in infarct size but is consistent with a protective effect of the drug against arrhythmogenesis.

Change in ST segment elevation 60 minutes after thrombolytic initiation predicts clinical outcome as accurately as later electrocardiographic changes

OBJECTIVE

To compare prospectively the prognostic accuracy of a 50% decrease in ST segment elevation on standard 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) recorded at 60, 90, and 180 minutes after thrombolysis initiation in acute myocardial infarction.

DESIGN

Consecutive sample prospective cohort study.

SETTING

A single coronary care unit in the north of England.

PATIENTS

190 consecutive patients receiving thrombolysis for first acute myocardial infarction.

INTERVENTIONS

Thrombolysis at baseline.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Cardiac mortality and left ventricular size and function assessed 36 days later.

RESULTS

Failure of ST segment elevation to resolve by 50% in the single lead of maximum ST elevation or the sum ST elevation of all infarct related ECG leads at each of the times studied was associated with a significantly higher mortality, larger left ventricular volume, and lower ejection fraction. There was some variation according to infarct site with only the 60 minute ECG predicting mortality after inferior myocardial infarction and only in anterior myocardial infarction was persistent ST elevation associated with worse left ventricular function. The analysis of the lead of maximum ST elevation at 60 minutes from thrombolysis performed as well as later ECGs in receiver operating characteristic curves for predicting clinical outcome.

CONCLUSION

The standard 12-lead ECG at 60 minutes predicts clinical outcome as accurately as later ECGs after thrombolysis for first acute myocardial infarction.

Early versus delayed angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition therapy in acute myocardial infarction. The healing and early afterload reducing therapy trial

BACKGROUND

Although ACE inhibitor therapy has been shown to reduce mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI), the optimal dose and the timing of its initiation have not been determined.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a double-blind trial of 352 patients with anterior MI, we compared the safety and effectiveness of early (day 1) versus delayed (day 14) initiation of the ACE inhibitor ramipril (10 mg) on echocardiographic measures of left ventricular (LV) area and ejection fraction (EF). An early, low-dose ramipril (0.625 mg) arm was also evaluated. Clinical events did not differ. During the first 14 days, the risk of manifesting a systolic arterial pressure of < or = 90 mm Hg was increased in both ramipril groups. LVEF increased in all groups during this period, but the early, full-dose ramipril group had the greatest improvement in EF (increase: full, 4.9 +/- 10.0; low, 3.9 +/- 8.2%; delayed, 2.4 +/- 8.8%; P for trend < .05) and was the only group that did not demonstrate a significant increase in LV diastolic area.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present study demonstrated that in patients with anterior MI, the early use of ramipril (titrated to 10 mg) attenuated LV remodeling and was associated with a prompter recovery of LVEF. The use of low-dose regimen did not prevent hypotension and had only intermediate benefits on LV size and function. The more favorable effects on LV topography of the early use of full-dose ramipril support the results of the major clinical trials, which have demonstrated an early survival benefit of ACE inhibition.

Captopril reduced plasminogen activator inhibitor activity in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Recent clinical trials have demonstrated that the administration of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors to patients with myocardial infarction reduces the incidence of recurrent myocardial infarction. It has also been reported that an elevated level of plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI) appears to constitute a marker of the risk of recurrent coronary thrombosis. To determine whether the ACE inhibitor captopril reduces plasma PAI inhibitor activity, we measured changes in plasma PAI activity (IU/ml), tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) antigen (ng/ml), and serum ACE activity (IU/L) in 14 survivors of myocardial infarction receiving captopril therapy (37.5 mg daily) and compared them with the values in 15 placebo-treated patients chosen at random. Blood sampling was performed at 07.00 h. In the captopril-treated group, serum ACE activity decreased significantly, from 14.0 +/- 0.8 to 11.5 +/- 1.2 IU/L 24 h after captopril therapy (p < 0.01), and those of PAI activity and t-PA antigen also decreased significantly-from 11.9 +/- 2.8 to 5.5 +/- 2.2 IU/ml (p < 0.02) and from 9.9 +/- 1.0 to 7.5 +/- 0.9 ng/ml (p < 0.05), respectively 48 h after captopril therapy. However, the levels of ACE activity, PAI activity, and t-PA antigen remained unchanged during the study period in the placebo group. Thus, our data indicate that the administration of captopril to patients with acute myocardial infarction may result in a reduced frequency of recurrent coronary thrombosis by increasing fibrinolytic capacity.

Clinical aspects of ACE inhibition in patients with acute myocardial infarction

The purpose of the present article was to review the current evidence on the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in acute myocardial infarction (MI). This article is based on published information as well as on our personal experience derived from an extensive analysis of the SMILE study. All the randomized trials have been included irrespective of the primary endpoint, and the results are presented in terms of either hemodynamic or clinical benefit. Short- and long-term treatment with ACE inhibitors in patients with acute MI results in a significant reduction in mortality, which is more evident in high risk patients (i.e., patients with left ventricular dysfunction, congestive heart failure on admission, or anterior myocardial infarction). Development and progression of congestive heart failure after myocardial infarction was significantly reduced by ACE inhibition, which also reduced the rate of reinfarction, the need for revascularization procedures, as well as the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias, probably through a mechanism involving some drug-dependent effects. In conclusion, the available data strongly support a wide benefit associated with the use of ACE inhibitors in patients with high-risk acute MI.

Which patient benefits from early angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition after myocardial infarction? Results of one-year serial echocardiographic follow-up from the Captopril and Thrombolysis Study (CATS)

OBJECTIVES

In this study we sought to investigate the effect of intervention with captopril within 6 h of the onset of myocardial infarction on left ventricular volume and clinical symptoms of heart failure in relation to infarct size during a 1-year follow-up period.

BACKGROUND

Remodeling of the heart starts in the early phase of myocardial infarction and is associated with an adverse prognosis. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition started in the subacute or late phase after myocardial infarction has been shown to improve prognosis.

METHODS

In the Captopril and Thrombolysis Study, 298 patients with a first anterior myocardial infarction treated with intravenous streptokinase were randomized to receive either oral captopril (25 mg three times a day) or placebo. The left ventricular volume index was assessed by two-dimensional echocardiography within 24 h, on days 3, 10 and 90 and after 1 year.

RESULTS

A small but significant increase in left ventricular volume indexes was observed after 12 months. Using a random coefficient model, no significant treatment effect on left ventricular volumes could be detected. In contrast, when survival models were used, the occurrence of left ventricular dilation was significatnly lower in captopril-treated patients (p = 0.018). In addition, the incidence of heart failure was lower in the captopril group (p < 0.03). This effect appeared early and was most obvious in patients with a medium-sized infarct (p = 0.04) and was not present in large infarcts.

CONCLUSIONS

Very early treatment with captopril after myocardial infarction significantly reduces the occurrence of early dilation and the progression to heart failure. These data underscore the importance of early treatment. Furthermore, patients with intermediate infarct size benefit the most from this treatment strategy.

A risk-benefit assessment of ACE inhibitor therapy post-myocardial infarction

The use of ACE inhibitors in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) has been the subject of several studies conducted during recent years. These studies have demonstrated the capacity of these agents to improve both survival and morbidity of patients with MI. However, the use of ACE inhibitors in patients with MI has been shown to reduce blood pressure (BP) and so could jeopardise the ischaemic myocardium. A significant reduction in systemic BP has been demonstrated by all the studies of ACE inhibitors in patients with MI, but no relationship has been found between the occurrence of hypotension and a worse clinical outcome. An increased risk of death has been observed exclusively in association with severe and sudden hypotension, the occurrence of which can be largely prevented by the administration of the ACE inhibitor according to an increasing dose-titration scheme. Conversely, a certain degree of long term BP reduction could result in some beneficial effect in patients with MI and contribute to the lower incidence of re-infarction observed in patients with acute MI undergoing long term treatment with captopril. Since the renin-angiotensin system is strictly related to kidney function, its blockade by an ACE inhibitor could result in some degree of renal dysfunction, particularly in patients with MI and impaired ventricular function. The available results from large-scale studies suggest that abnormalities in kidney function (namely an increase in serum creatinine) are observed in 0.9 to 2.4% of patients with MI who, nevertheless, experience some benefit from treatment with ACE inhibitors. Interestingly, the administration of ACE inhibitors does not seem to further compromise severely impaired renal function, and may also represent a useful tool for the treatment of patients with renal dysfunction associated with MI. The use of ACE inhibitors in patients with MI is associated with a satisfactory clinical and laboratory safety profile. The occurrence of significant adverse effects seems to be very low and mainly attributable to a rather modest prevalence of cough (2.4 to 6.8%). Discontinuation of treatment because of biochemical and haematological abnormalities has been observed in less than 1% of treated patients. Thus, the beneficial effects of ACE inhibitor treatment seem to outweigh safety concerns, thereby reinforcing the role of ACE inhibition as a suitable therapeutic strategy in the treatment of patients with MI.

Effect of early enalapril therapy on left ventricular function and structure in acute myocardial infarction

Infarct expansion starts within hours to days after transmural myocardial injury. Previous echocardiographic and left ventriculographic studies demonstrated that angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor therapy limits left ventricular dilatation, particularly in patients with anterior wall acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or impaired left ventricular function. Forty-three patients with an acute Q-wave AMI were randomized within 24 hours of symptom onset to intravenous enalaprilat (1 mg) or placebo. Patients were then given corresponding oral therapy and followed for 1 month. Predrug and 1-month gated blood pool scans were obtained in 32 patients to evaluate changes in cardiac volumes and ejection fraction. Twenty-three patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging at 1 month to evaluate left ventricular infarct expansion. Blood pressure decreased at 6 hours but returned to baseline in both groups after 1 month of therapy. The change in cardiac volumes from baseline to 1 month differed between the placebo (end-diastolic volume +16 +/- 5 ml, end-systolic volume +8 +/- 6 ml), and enalapril (end-diastolic volume -8 +/- 9 ml and end-systolic volume -14 +/- 7 ml) groups (p < 0.05 vs placebo). Global and infarct zone ejection fractions improved significantly at 1 month in the enalapril group (+6 +/- 3% and 19 +/- 5%, respectively) but did not change over 1 month in the placebo group. Infarct segment length and infarct expansion index by magnetic resonance imaging were significantly less in those treated with enalapril, suggesting less infarct expansion in this group. Thus, early administration of enalaprilat to patients presenting with a first Q-wave AMI prevents cardiac dilatation and infarct expansion.

Left ventricular volume in thrombolysed patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction: the effect of captopril and xamoterol

We measured left ventricular volume in 70 asymptomatic patients after first Q-wave anterior myocardial infarction in order to determine whether ventricular dilatation occurs and whether there is evidence for its attenuation or prevention by treatment with captopril or xamoterol--PRevention Of VEntricular Dilatation?: the PROVED? study. 77% of patients received thrombolytic treatment. Patients were randomised a mean of 11 days after infarction to receive either captopril 25 mg three times daily, xamoterol 200 mg twice daily or matching placebo. After 6 months of treatment, 6 patients from the placebo group (n = 24), 1 from the captopril group (n = 23) and 3 from the xamoterol group (n = 23) had been withdrawn from the study because of clinical complications. Left ventricular volume was measured using magnetic resonance imaging, before randomisation and after 6 months of treatment. Changes in left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volume after 6 months of treatment were defined prospectively as the primary endpoints. Mean initial end-diastolic volume index was 85 (S.D. 19) ml/m2, mean end-systolic volume index was 45 (S.D. 18) ml/m2, and mean ejection fraction was 48 (S.D. 11)% for the whole group. There was no significant change in left ventricular volume index in the placebo or either treatment group after 6 months of treatment. Only minimal left ventricular dilatation was evident at 11 days. No further increase in left ventricular volume occurred after six months and there was no additional benefit from treatment with either captopril or xamoterol.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effects of L-carnitine administration on left ventricular remodeling after acute anterior myocardial infarction: the L-Carnitine Ecocardiografia Digitalizzata Infarto Miocardico (CEDIM) Trial

OBJECTIVES

This study was performed to evaluate the effects of L-carnitine administration on long-term left ventricular dilation in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND

Carnitine is a physiologic compound that performs an essential role in myocardial energy production at the mitochondrial level. Myocardial carnitine deprivation occurs during ischemia, acute myocardial infarction and cardiac failure. Experimental studies have suggested that exogenous carnitine administration during these events has a beneficial effect on function.

METHODS

The L-Carnitine Ecocardiografia Digitalizzata Infarto Miocardico (CEDIM) trial was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial in which 472 patients with a first acute myocardial infarction and high quality two-dimensional echocardiograms received either placebo (239 patients) or L-carnitine (233 patients) within 24 h of onset of chest pain. Placebo or L-carnitine was given at a dose of 9 g/day intravenously for the first 5 days and then 6 g/day orally for the next 12 months. Left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction were evaluated on admission, at discharge from hospital and at 3, 6 and 12 months after acute myocardial infarction.

RESULTS

A significant attenuation of left ventricular dilation in the first year after acute myocardial infarction was observed in patients treated with L-carnitine compared with those receiving placebo. The percent increase in both end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes from admission to 3-, 6- and 12-month evaluation was significantly reduced in the L-carnitine group. No significant differences were observed in left ventricular ejection fraction changes over time in the two groups. Although not designed to demonstrate differences in clinical end points, the combined incidence of death and congestive heart failure after discharge was 14 (6%) in the L-carnitine treatment group versus 23 (9.6%) in the placebo group (p = NS). Incidence of ischemic events during follow-up was similar in the two groups of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

L-Carnitine treatment initiated early after acute myocardial infarction and continued for 12 months can attenuate left ventricular dilation during the first year after an acute myocardial infarction, resulting in smaller left ventricular volumes at 3, 6 and 12 months after the emergent event.

Effects of early enalapril treatment on global and regional wall motion in acute myocardial infarction. CONSENSUS II Multi Echo Study Group

Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor therapy can preserve left ventricular (LV) function and geometric features and improve survival in subsets of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We investigated the effect of enalapril treatment initiated < 24 hours after AMI on global and regional echocardiographic wall motion indexes obtained at 2 to 5 days and at 1 and 6 months in 428 consecutive patients enrolled in the randomized, placebo-controlled Cooperative New Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study II. In anterior AMIs, the non-infarct-zone index deteriorated in the placebo group but remained unchanged in the enalapril-treated group (0.18 vs 0.02; p < or = 0.05), an effect related to attenuated LV volume expansion. No treatment effects were observed in nonanterior AMIs or in the entire unselected population. Thus in an unselected population with AMI, early enalapril treatment had no effect on LV function; yet in patients with anterior infarcts, LV function was maintained through preservation of function in the noninfarcted myocardium.

Effect of captopril and enalapril on left ventricular geometry, function and collagen during healing after anterior and inferior myocardial infarction in a dog model

OBJECTIVES

This study compared the effects of captopril and enalapril on left ventricular geometry, function and mass and on scar collagen and topography during healing after anterior and inferior myocardial infarction in a canine model.

BACKGROUND

The beneficial effect of prolonged angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy on remodeling during healing after myocardial infarction might be greater in anterior than inferior infarcts and more effective with captopril than enalapril therapy.

METHODS

The effects of 6 weeks of therapy with captopril (50 mg twice a day), enalapril (2.5 mg twice a day) or placebo on in vivo variables of left ventricular remodeling, function and mass (by echocardiography), hemodynamic function, postmortem topography (by planimetry) and collagen (hydroxyproline levels) were studied in 36 instrumented dogs randomized to receive therapy 48 h after left anterior descending or left circumflex coronary artery occlusion.

RESULTS

Compared with placebo therapy, both captopril and enalapril decreased infarct expansion and thinning, progressive ventricular dilation, ventricular mass and asynergy and infarct collagen levels in anterior and inferior infarcts. Despite similar small scar sizes, the effects on remodeling and dysfunction were greater in anterior than inferior infarcts. In addition, captopril produced greater attenuation of infarct expansion and ventricular enlargement, greater improvement in volume ejection fraction and less decrease in infarct collagen levels than enalapril.

CONCLUSIONS

On balance, captopril and enalapril attenuated left ventricular remodeling and preserved function in small anterior and inferior infarcts despite differences in the effects of the drugs on individual remodeling variables. Further studies will be needed to determine whether inhibition of infarct collagen might be harmful, or differences between captopril and enalapril therapy important, in large transmural infarctions.

Do radionuclide and echocardiographic techniques give a universal cut off value for left ventricular ejection fraction that can be used to select patients for treatment with ACE inhibitors after myocardial infarction?

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether echocardiography and radionuclide angiography give comparable results when the left ventricular ejection fraction is measured early after myocardial infarction and thus whether, irrespective of the method used, a single value for the ejection fraction could be used as a guide for starting treatment with an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor.

DESIGN

Prospective comparison of measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction by echocardiography and radionuclide angiography.

SETTING

Coronary care units of two university teaching hospitals in Glasgow.

PATIENTS

99 patients studied within 36 hours of acute myocardial infarction.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Left ventricular ejection fraction assessed by echocardiography and radionuclide angiography.

RESULTS

70 (77%) of the 99 patients had ejection fraction measured by both echocardiographic and radionuclide techniques, 30 in centre 1 and 40 in centre 2. In centre 1 the mean difference (SD) in ejection fraction (radionuclide angiography--echocardiography) was -8 (10%); 95% CI -12 to -4%. In centre 2 the mean difference was -14 (11%); 95% CI -17 to -11%. If patients had been treated with an ACE inhibitor on the basis of a radionuclide ejection fraction of < 40% then 93% in centre 1 (28 of 30) and 98% in centre 2 (39 of 40) would have been treated. This compares with 63% (19 of 30) and 50% (20 of 40), respectively if echocardiography had been used as a guide.

CONCLUSION

Measurement of ejection fraction is highly dependent on the method used and it is therefore impossible to quote a universally applicable figure for left ventricular ejection fraction below which an ACE inhibitor should be used after myocardial infarction.

Activation and inhibition of the endogenous opioid system in human heart failure

BACKGROUND

In a canine model of congestive heart failure beta endorphin concentrations were high and opioid receptor antagonists exerted beneficial haemodynamic effects. In humans previous studies have suggested that opioid peptides may modify the perception of breathlessness and fatigue in heart failure.

METHODS

Plasma concentrations of beta endorphin were measured in patients with acute and chronic heart failure and cardiogenic shock. A subgroup of eight patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III-IV heart failure was assessed for acute haemodynamic effects of naloxone, an opioid receptor antagonist. A separate group of 10 patients with class II-III heart failure, was randomised to a double blind placebo controlled study of the effects of intravenous naloxone on cardiopulmonary exercise performance.

RESULTS

Plasma concentrations of beta endorphin were usually normal in patients with chronic heart failure and did not correlate with severity as assessed by NYHA class. In 29% of patients with acute heart failure and 71% of those with cardiogenic shock beta endorphin concentrations were high. The median concentration in the cardiogenic shock group was significantly higher than in either of the two heart failure groups and there was some evidence of a relation between beta endorphin concentrations and survival. At the doses tested, naloxone was unable to modify systemic haemodynamics, exercise performance, or symptoms in patients with chronic congestive heart failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Circulating concentrations of beta endorphin are usually normal in patients with chronic congestive heart failure. Inhibition of the endogenous opioid system is unlikely to have therapeutic potential in heart failure.

Determinants of left ventricular function two weeks and one year after an acute myocardial infarction

This study examines possible covariates of left ventricular function two weeks and sixteen months after an acute infarction. It was performed in a group of 312 patients randomized double blindly to recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) (n = 156) or placebo treatment and followed thereafter for at least one year. Two weeks after the infarction, enzymatic infarct size, infarct-related vessel, and number of diseased coronary arteries were significant determinants of the infarct-related regional wall motion (centerline method) (R2 = 0.25 to 0.60, P = 0.0001). Enzymatic infarct size, regional wall motion of both infarct-related and remote areas, reinfarction, and treatment allocation were significant independent correlates of ejection fraction (R2 = 0.76), end-diastolic volume (R2 = 0.20), and end-systolic volume (R2 = 0.69, P < 0.0001). Infarct-related coronary artery and predischarge end-systolic volume were significant independent covariates of ejection fraction at rest (R2 = 0.47) after sixteen months. Age, enzymatic infarct size, and predischarge end-diastolic volume were independent determinants of the maximal (R2 = 0.49, P < 0.0001) and peak exercise ejection fraction (R2 = 0.49, P < 0.0001).

Expanding the paradigm of the renin-angiotensin system and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors

The renin-angiotensin system acts systemically and locally to influence vascular tone, blood volume, myocardial contractility, thromboresistance, and tissue responses to injury. ACE inhibitors have assumed a vital role in the treatment of patients with ventricular dysfunction, including those who have sustained one or more myocardial infarctions. The greatest benefits appear over time and not unexpectedly are most pronounced in cases of moderate to severe reduction in left ventricular performance. Emerging evidence suggests that the paradigm for ACE inhibitor use will expand even further, opening new doors for patient care.