Cardiac allograft vasculopathy assessed by intravascular ultrasonography and nonimmunologic risk factors

Effect of Statin Intensity on the Progression of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy

Background: In the non-transplant population, hyperlipidaemia has shifted from targeting LDL goals to statin intensity-based treatment. It is unknown whether this strategy is also beneficial in cardiac transplantation. Methods: This single-centre retrospective study evaluated the effect of statin use and intensity on time to cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) after cardiac transplantation. Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression survival methods were used to assess the association of statin intensity and median post-transplant LDL on CAV-free survival. Results: The study involved 143 adults (71% men, average follow-up of 25 ± 14 months) who underwent transplant between 2013 and 2017. Mean CAV-free survival was 47.5 months (95% CI [43.1–51.8]), with 29 patients having CAV grade 1 or greater. Median LDL was not associated with time to CAV (p=0.790). CAV-free survival did not differ between intensity groups (p=0.435). Conclusion: Given the non-statistically significant difference in time to CAV with higher intensity statins, the data suggest that advancing moderate- or high-intensity statin after cardiac transplantation may not provide additional long-term clinical benefit. Trial registration: Not applicable.

A primer for managing cardiac transplant patients in the emergency department setting

BACKGROUND

Cardiac transplant is an effective long-term management option for several severe cardiac diseases. These cardiac transplant patients may present to the emergency department with a range of issues involving the cardiac transplantation, including complications due to their transplant as well as altered presentations of disease resulting from their transplant.

OBJECTIVE

This narrative review provides a focused guide to the evaluation and management of patients with cardiac transplantation and its complications.

DISCUSSION

Cardiac transplant is an effective therapy for end-stage heart failure. A transplanted heart varies both anatomically and physiologically from a native heart. Several significant complications may occur. Graft failure, rejection, and infection are common causes of morbidity and mortality within the first year of transplant. As these patients are on significant immunosuppressive medication regimens, they are at risk of infection, but inadequate immunosuppression increases the risk of acute rejection. A variety of dysrhythmias such as atrial fibrillation and ventricular dysrhythmias may occur. These patients are also at risk of acute coronary syndrome, cardiac allograft vasculopathy, and medication adverse events. Importantly, patients with acute coronary syndrome can have an altered presentation with the so-called "painless" myocardial infarction. Consultation with the transplant physician is recommended, if available, for these patients to assist in evaluation and management.

CONCLUSIONS

An understanding of the presentations and various complications that may affect patients with cardiac transplant will assist emergency clinicians in the care of these patients.

Prognostic Value of Biomarkers in Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy following Heart Transplantation: A Literature Review

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), also known as cardiac transplant vasculopathy, is a major determinant of long-term survival among cardiac transplantation recipients. Histologically, CAV is featured by diffuse, concentric thickening of the vascular wall, and primarily affects large and small epicardial coronary arteries, intramyocardial arteries, and veins. Owing to graft denervation, CAV typically follows an insidious course, and patients may not experience classic angina symptoms but instead present with progressive heart failure or ventricular arrhythmias. Recent studies on biomarkers have furthered the knowledge concerning the prediction and prognosis of CAV. Given its association with metabolic, thrombotic, inflammatory, and immunologic markers, CAV is likely to represent a complex multifactorial process that involves both immune-mediated and non-immune-mediated pathways. In order to identify the high-risk patients that would benefit from early intervention, future research is warranted to examine the usefulness of a biomarker panel in CAV risk stratification.

Initial Intravascular Ultrasound Without a Routine Early Baseline Study in the Evaluation of Cardiac Transplant Vasculopathy has Prognostic Valve

BACKGROUND

Abnormal minimal intimal thickening (MIT) on intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) defined as difference of ≥0.5 mm between baseline and one-year post-transplantation has been shown to have prognostic value. The goal of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate whether abnormal MIT found on routine IVUS studies in cardiac transplant patients after 6 months without an early baseline study (modified MIT or MMIT), has any prognostic value. Furthermore, we evaluated the prognostic effect of serial IVUS performed beyond one year.

METHODS

A cohort of 149 cardiac transplant patients who underwent IVUS examination > 6 months post-transplant were evaluated retrospectively. Of these 149 patients, 109 patients underwent a subsequent IVUS study approximately 1 year following the initial study. MMIT values of ≥0.5 mm without an early baseline study were correlated with major adverse cardiac event (MACE).

RESULTS

The all-cause mortality was 4.7% (5/107) in patients with MMIT of <0.5 mm vs. 14.6% (6/41) in patients with MMIT of ≥0.5 mm [hazards ratio (HR): 3.2; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.002-12.17; p = 0.039]. The overall MACE rate was 8.4% (9/107) in patients with MMIT of <0.5 mm vs. 24.4% (10/41) in patients with MMIT of ≥0.5 mm [HR: 6.7; 95% CI: 1.30-9.42; p = 0.009]. After adjusting for age, abnormal MMIT remained a significant independent predictor of MACE (HR: 3.93; CI 1.21-12.81; p = 0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of abnormal MMIT noted on IVUS performed after 6 months post-transplantation without a routine baseline IVUS carries important prognostic value.

Community-Based Weight Management in Long-Term Heart Transplant Recipients: A Pilot Study

Background

Heart transplant recipients often suffer from obesity, dyslipidemia, and hypertension thought to be related to triple-drug immunosuppression and poor adherence to diet and exercise. A lifestyle intervention that allows recipients to attend a community-based weight management program may improve health outcomes.

Objective

To determine (1) the effects of attending a community-based weight management program on weight, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and the lipid profile; and (2) the feasibility of a community-based program for weight management.

Methods

Twenty-one patients (81% male; age 57 years, 99.7 months since transplantation) participated in a randomized clinical trial and received either weight management counseling (control) or a 6-month scholarship to a structured commercial program (treatment). Using simple analysis of covariance models, group differences were assessed and reported as marginal means.

Results

At baseline, there were no demographic differences between groups. There were no differences in outcome variables except weight (control, 102.1 kg vs treatment, 98.3 kg; P = .05). After 6 months, significant differences were found in weight (control, 100.5 kg vs treatment, 95.6 kg; P = .047) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (control, 40.6 mg/dL vs treatment, 49.1 mg/dL; P = .044). A marginally significant difference was found in systolic blood pressure (control, 138 mm Hg vs treatment, 121 mm Hg; P=.07). A decrease in diastolic blood pressure (6 mm Hg) was attributed to treatment effect ( P = .16). No differences were noted in total cholesterol, triglycerides, or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Conclusions

The structured commercial program appears to be an effective, feasible alternative to usual care. Findings need to be confirmed in future research with a larger sample.

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy: diagnosis, therapy, and prognosis

Development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy represents the major determinant of long-term survival in patients after heart transplantation. Due to graft denervation, these patients seldom present with classic symptoms of angina pectoris, and the first clinical presentations are progressive heart failure or sudden cardiac death. Although coronary angiography remains the routine technique for coronary artery disease detection, it is not sensitive enough for screening purposes. This is especially the case in the first year after transplantation when diffuse and concentric vascular changes can be easily detected only by intravascular ultrasound. The treatment of the established vasculopathy is disappointing, so the primary effort should be directed toward early prevention and diagnosis. Due to diffuse vascular changes, revascularization procedures are restricted only to a relatively small proportion of patients with favorable coronary anatomy. Percutaneous coronary intervention is preferred over surgical revascularization since it leads to better acute results and patient survival. Although there is no proven long-term advantage of drug-eluting stents for the treatment of in-stent restenosis, they are preferred over bare-metal stents. Severe vasculopathy has a poor prognosis and the only definitive treatment is retransplantation. This article reviews the present knowledge on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of cardiac allograft vasculopathy.

mTOR inhibitors and dyslipidemia in transplant recipients: a cause for concern?

Post-transplant dyslipidemia is exacerbated by mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors. Early clinical trials of mTOR inhibitors used fixed dosing with no concomitant reduction in calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) exposure, leading to concerns when consistent and marked dyslipidemia was observed. With use of modern concentration-controlled mTOR inhibitor regimens within CNI-free or reduced-exposure CNI regimens, however, the dyslipidemic effect persists but is less pronounced. Typically, total cholesterol levels are at the upper end of normal, or indicate borderline risk, in kidney and liver transplant recipients, and are lower in heart transplant patients under near-universal statin therapy. Of note, it is possible that mTOR inhibitors may offer a cardioprotective effect. Experimental evidence for delayed progression of atherosclerosis is consistent with evidence from heart transplantation that coronary artery intimal thickening and the incidence of cardiac allograft vasculopathy are reduced with everolimus versus cyclosporine therapy. Preliminary data also indicate that mTOR inhibitors may improve arterial stiffness, a predictor of cardiovascular events, and may reduce ventricular remodeling and decrease left ventricular mass through an anti-fibrotic effect. Post-transplant dyslipidemia under mTOR inhibitor therapy should be monitored and managed closely, but unless unresponsive to therapy should not be regarded as a barrier to its use.

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy by intravascular ultrasound in heart transplant patients: substudy from the Everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil randomized, multicenter trial

OBJECTIVES

A pre-planned substudy of a larger multicenter randomized trial was undertaken to compare the efficacy of everolimus with reduced-dose cyclosporine in the prevention of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) after heart transplantation to that of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with standard-dose cyclosporine.

BACKGROUND

CAV is a major cause of long-term mortality following heart transplantation. Everolimus has been shown to reduce the severity and incidence of CAV as measured by first year intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). MMF, in combination with cyclosporine, has also been shown to have a beneficial effect in slowing the progression of CAV.

METHODS

Study patients were a pre-specified subgroup of the 553-patient Everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in heart transplantation: a randomized, multicenter trial who underwent heart transplantation and were randomized to everolimus 1.5 mg or MMF 3 g/day. IVUS was performed at baseline and at 12 months. Evaluable IVUS data were available in 189 patients (34.6%).

RESULTS

Increase in average maximal intimal thickness (MIT) from baseline to month 12 was significantly smaller in the everolimus 1.5 mg group compared with the MMF group (0.03 mm vs. 0.07 mm, p < 0.001). The incidence of CAV, defined as an increase in MIT from baseline to month 12 of greater than 0.5 mm, was 12.5% with everolimus versus 26.7% with MMF (p = 0.018). These findings remained irrespective of sex, age, diabetic status, donor disease, and across lipid categories.

CONCLUSIONS

Everolimus was significantly more efficacious than MMF in preventing CAV as measured by IVUS among heart-transplant recipients after 1 year, a finding, which was maintained in a range of patient subpopulations. CV surgery: transplantation, ventricular assistance, cardiomyopathy.

Endothelial dysfunction and cardiac allograft vasculopathy

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy remains a major challenge to long-term survival after heart transplantation. Endothelial injury and dysfunction, as a result of multifactorial immunologic and nonimmunologic insults in the donor and the recipient, are prevalent early after transplant and may be precursors to overt cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Current strategies for managing cardiac allograft vasculopathy, however, rely on the identification and treatment of established disease. Improved understanding of mechanisms leading to endothelial dysfunction in heart transplant recipients may provide the foundation for the development of sensitive screening techniques and preventive therapies.

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy: current knowledge and future direction

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a unique form of coronary artery disease affecting heart transplant recipients. Although prognosis of heart transplant recipients has improved over time, CAV remains a significant cause of mortality beyond the first year of cardiac transplantation. Many traditional and non-traditional risk factors for the development of CAV have been described. Traditional risk factors include dyslipidemia, diabetes and hypertension. Non-traditional risk factors include cytomegalovirus infection, HLA mismatch, antibody-mediated rejection, and mode of donor brain death. There is a complex interplay between immunological and non-immunological factors ultimately leading to endothelial injury and exaggerated repair response. Pathologically, CAV manifests as fibroelastic proliferation of intima and luminal stenosis. Early diagnosis is paramount as heart transplant recipients are frequently asymptomatic owing to cardiac denervation related to the transplant surgery. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) offers many advantages over conventional angiography and is an excellent predictor of prognosis in heart transplant recipients. Many non-invasive diagnostic tests including dobutamine stress echocardiography, CT angiography, and MRI are available; though, none has replaced angiography. This review discusses the risk factors, pathogenesis, and diagnosis of CAV and highlights some current concepts and recent developments in this field.

Effect of ABCB1 genotype on pre- and post-cardiac transplantation plasma lipid concentrations

Genetic variation of ATP-binding cassette subfamily B member 1 (ABCB1) which encodes P-glycoprotein (P-gp) has been associated with lipid levels and response to statins. Here, we studied these associations in patients with advanced heart failure who subsequently underwent transplantation. Fasting total cholesterol (TC), low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and triglycerides (TG) concentrations in 268 adult heart transplant recipients were analysed retrospectively before and at 1 year after transplantation (n = 176). ABCB1 genotyping and haplotyping for C1236T, G2677T/A and C3435T was performed using polymerase chain reaction. Pre-transplant LDL cholesterol was found to be associated with the C3435T genotype and the G2677T/A-C3435T and C1236T-G2677T/A-C3435T haplotypes. T-allele carriers at all loci (n = 77) had higher LDL levels than non-T-allele carriers (n = 24, 3.5 ± 1.2 vs. 2.8 ± 1.2 mmol/L, respectively, p = 0.025). This association remained after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, statin use and underlying ischaemic heart disease. ABCB1 genotype was not associated with post-transplant lipid parameters. Hypercholesterolaemia (TC >5.7 mmol/L) was more prevalent post-transplant than pre-transplant (51% vs. 30%, respectively) and was likely related to steroid and calcineurin inhibitor use. Muscle-related statin effects were only seen in patients possessing the T-haplotype. In conclusion, an association between ABCB1 haplotype and plasma fasting LDL cholesterol concentration was found in patients with advanced heart failure. This association was not seen 1 year after cardiac transplantation.

Eprosartan in the Primary Prevention of Cardiac Allograft Vascular Disease: A Double-Blind Prospectively Randomized Study using Intravascular Ultrasound

The angiotensin blocker (ARB) eprosartan (600 mg once daily) and the calcium antagonist diltiazem (90 mg twice daily) were studied in a 24-month prospective, randomized, double-blind trial involving 53 heart transplant patients. The study compared their effects on the development of post-transplant cardiac allograft vasculopathy, a condition that frequently impairs long-term post-transplantation survival and where angiotensin blockers might be expected to play a preventive role. From baseline to month 12, the mean plaque volume increased by 7.7 mm3 for eprosartan-treated patients and by 34.4 mm3 for diltiazem-treated patients, but the eprosartan-related trend for reduced myointimal hyperplasia was not statistically significant. The trend in favour of eprosartan for secondary parameters (mean intimal index, vessel volume, lumen volume and coronary flow reserve) also failed to reach significance. The lack of effect might be due to a lower than planned sample size and observation periods due to recruitment difficulties. A larger study is required to confirm these preliminary findings.

Transplant-associated hyperglycemia

As patient survival after solid organ transplantation continues to improve, comorbidites associated with chronic hyperglycemia will assume increasing importance in limiting outcomes and quality of life. New-onset diabetes mellitus commonly occurs in the posttransplant setting and is associated with multiple complications including graft loss, cardiovascular disease, infection, and death. Furthermore, recent studies have begun to highlight the very high posttransplant prevalence and the significant cardiovascular implications of the prediabetic states of impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance, indicating that the overall burden of transplantation-associated hyperglycemia is far greater than previously appreciated. Shared and distinct pathogenic factors and clinical repercussions exist among the organ-specific transplant scenarios. Diabetogenic immunosuppressive agents are common to all organ transplant settings, whereas glucose regulation is also strained by the restoration of failed hepatic and renal function. The atherogenic properties of hyperglycemia are particularly significant in the kidney transplant population, which has a marked predisposition to cardiovascular disease, whereas accelerated cardiac allograft vasculopathy and liver fibrosis have been associated with hyperglycemia in the heart and liver transplant settings, respectively. Aggressive screening will effectively detect transplant-associated hyperglycemia, whereas risk factor modification, lifestyle intervention and, where appropriate, drug therapy, may decrease its impact. Topics of future investigation should include the use of emerging diabetes therapies and avenues for the prevention and reversal of transplant-associated hyperglycemia.

Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy: An Update

Allograft vasculopathy remains the nemesis of long-term survival in heart transplantation. Possible modifying risk factors such as obesity, diabetes, and hypertension should continue to be pursued aggressively. All patients should receive statins. Clinical trials will provide the evidence needed to ascertain whether mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors should be used in de novo cardiac transplant recipients to attenuate cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). Intravascular ultrasound appears to play a key role in the diagnosis and evaluation of new treatments, and may indeed represent a surrogate marker that can be used to tailor management and improve outcomes. A better understanding of CAV is needed to develop targeted preventive therapies. Ongoing research in native atherosclerosis and vascular biology may provide answers within the next decade.

Association of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and serum lipids with plaque regression in cardiac allograft vasculopathy

We assessed clinical predictors of the process of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) in 39 consecutive patients (mean 49 years old) using three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound (3-D IVUS) examination of the left anterior descending coronary artery at 36 +/- 38 months and 47 +/- 40 months after cardiac allotransplantation (TX). Compared with 17 patients with plaque progression, 22 patients with plaque regression were more likely to be male (P < .01), to have a higher use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI, P < .05), and to have a lower volumetric remodeling index (P < .001). The changes in plaque volume correlated with the changes in total cholesterol (P < .005) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P < .02). Plaque progression of CAV was independently associated with time after TX, hypertension, nonuse of ACEI, donor age, and changes in total cholesterol and triglycerides. In conclusion, plaque progression is associated with positive vascular remodeling and plaque regression is associated with lower serum lipids and ACEI in patients after TX.

Tacrolimus with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or sirolimus vs. cyclosporine with MMF in cardiac transplant patients: 1-year report

The most advantageous combination of immunosuppressive agents for cardiac transplant recipients has not yet been established. Between November 2001 and June 2003, 343 de novo cardiac transplant recipients were randomized to receive steroids and either tacrolimus (TAC) + sirolimus (SRL), TAC + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or cyclosporine (CYA) + MMF. Antilymphocyte induction therapy was allowed for up to 5 days. The primary endpoint of >/=3A rejection or hemodynamic compromise rejection requiring treatment showed no significant difference at 6 months (TAC/MMF 22.4%, TAC/SRL 24.3%, CYA/MMF 31.6%, p = 0.271) and 1 year (p = 0.056), but it was significantly lower in the TAC/MMF group when compared only to the CYA/MMF group at 1 year (23.4% vs. 36.8%; p = 0.029). Differences in the incidence of any treated rejection were significant (TAC/SRL = 35%, TAC/MMF = 42%, CYA/MMF = 59%; p < 0.001), as were median levels of serum creatinine (TAC/SRL = 1.5 mg/dL, TAC/MMF = 1.3 mg/dL, CYA/MMF = 1.5 mg/dL; p = 0.032) and triglycerides (TAC/SRL = 162 mg/dL, TAC/MMF = 126 mg/dL, CYA/MMF = 154 mg/dL; p = 0.028). The TAC/SRL group encountered fewer viral infections but more fungal infections and impaired wound healing. These secondary endpoints suggest that the TAC/MMF combination appears to offer more advantages than TAC/SRL or CYA/MMF in cardiac transplant patients, including fewer >/=3A rejections or hemodynamic compromise rejections and an improved side-effect profile.

Recurrence of in-stent restenosis in cardiac allograft vasculopathy following implantation of a sirolimus-eluting stent

Coronary lesions in patients with advanced cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) are frequently treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. Despite high primary success rates, long-term outcome is significantly impaired by a high incidence of restenosis. In nontransplanted patients, the use of drug-eluting stents (DES) significantly decreases the rate of coronary in-stent restenosis. We report a case treated for cardiac allograft coronary in-stent restenosis with a sirolimus-eluting stent presenting with recurrent in-stent restenosis at follow up. However, the pattern of in-stent restenosis changed from diffuse proliferative disease in the bare-metal stent to a focal pattern in the sirolimus-eluting stent concordant with observations in nontransplanted patients. This case highlights the need for further studies addressing the effect of DES for the prevention of restenosis both in de novo as well as in-stent restenotic lesions in patients with CAV.

Current understanding and management of allograft vasculopathy

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is the major obstacle to long-term survival after heart transplantation. It is a rapidly progressive, obliterative form of coronary vasculopathy distinct from classic atheromatous disease. The pathogenesis is most likely multifactorial and involves both alloantigen dependent and independent mechanisms. Since there is no definitive treatment for CAV and new immunosuppressive agents can only slow the progression of this disease, the prophylaxis and modification of numerous risk factors remains the foundation of posttransplant management in the heart transplant recipient. In this review, we discuss current understanding of the pathogenesis of CAV, novel diagnostic and therapeutic avenues and explore optimal approaches to risk factors modification.

Advancing Immunosuppression Therapy to Counter the Progression of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy

BACKGROUND

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is the major cause of late mortality in heart transplant recipients. Because immunosuppressive therapy has been convincingly shown to suppress cellular rejection and prolong cardiac allograft survival, we assessed the efficacy of advancing immunosuppressive therapy in reversing or delaying CAV by switching azathioprine to combination mycophenolate mofetil and prednisone (MMF-P).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Seventeen adult posttransplant patients, whose CAV was prospectively approached with the MMF-P protocol, were studied. The development of significant CAV was declared on the index coronary angiogram and the MMF-P protocol was instituted. The degree of occlusion for all coronary lesions was quantitated for the index angiogram, and for the angiograms performed 1 year before (baseline) the index angiogram and annually for 2 years after the index angiogram (MMF-P years 1 and 2). There was a significant change in percent occlusion over time (P < .001). Percent occlusion increased significantly from the baseline year to the index CAV year, but then decreased significantly from the index CAV year to the MMF-P treatment years 1 and 2.

CONCLUSION

Advancing immunosuppression with MMF-P can delay the progression of and partially reverse lumen narrowing of CAV in heart transplant recipients.

Factors predicting 10-year survival after heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

We sought to identify factors predictive of long-term (>10-year) survival in heart transplant (HTx) recipients.

METHODS

Four hundred fifteen adult patients underwent HTx at our institution between August 1982 and May 1997. The 158 patients who survived >10 years (Group A) and the 116 patients who died between 2 and 6 years (Group B) of HTx were compared in terms of gender, gender mismatch, ethnicity, age, height, weight, United Network for Organ Sharing status, type of induction therapy (OKT3 or anti-thymocyte globulin), infections (bacterial, viral, fungal and protozoal), cytomegalovirus (CMV) status, CMV mismatch, diabetes mellitus, hypertension and incidence of rejection episodes and transplant coronary artery disease within 2 years of HTx.

RESULTS

Group A (135 men, 23 women; mean age 48 +/- 11 years) had significantly fewer post-HTx rejection episodes and viral, bacterial, fungal and total infections than did Group B (95 men, 21 women; mean age 49 +/- 12 years). Group A also had a significantly lower mean donor age, a lower incidence of pre-HTx diabetes, and a lower mean cholesterol level 1 year after HTx. In a multivariate analysis, fewer bacterial infections and rejection episodes after HTx, the absence of pre-HTx diabetes, and lower donor age were associated with longer survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-HTx diabetes, donor age and incidences of infection and rejection within 2 years of HTx predict long-term (>10-year) survival. Better control of infection and rejection during the first 2 years after HTx may improve survival.

Therapeutic drug monitoring for everolimus in heart transplant recipients based on exposure-effect modeling

Everolimus, a proliferation signal inhibitor, is an immunosuppressant that targets the primary causes of progressive allograft dysfunction, thus improving the long-term outcome after heart transplantation. The present study investigated whether therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of everolimus would benefit heart transplant patients. Data from a twelve-month phase III trial comparing everolimus (1.5 or 3 mg daily) with azathioprine were used to evaluate everolimus pharmacokinetics, exposure-efficacy/safety and TDM prognostic simulations. Everolimus trough levels were stable in the first year post-transplant and averaged 5.2 +/- 3.8 and 9.4 +/- 6.3 ng/mL in patients treated with 1.5 and 3 mg/day, respectively. Cyclosporine trough levels were similar in all treatment groups. Biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) was reduced with everolimus trough levels > or =3 ng/mL. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) analysis showed evidence of reduced vasculopathy at 12 months with increasing everolimus exposure. Unlike cyclosporine, increasing everolimus exposure was not related to a higher rate of renal dysfunction. The TDM simulation, which was based on two everolimus dose adjustments and an initial starting dose of 1.5 mg/day, showed that the simulated BPAR rate (with TDM) was 21% versus 26% in the group with fixed dosing. Therefore, TDM in heart transplantation could optimize immunosuppressive efficacy and reduce treatment-related toxicity.

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy after heart transplantation: risk factors and management

Cardiovascular disease post-transplant, particularly ischemic heart disease, is a significant problem for all transplant recipients. The major risk factors-smoking, obesity, diabetes, dyslipidemia and hypertension-are often more prevalent in heart transplant populations than in the general population. One of the main risk factors influencing graft loss and patient survival is cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). Because CAV affects between 30% and 60% of cardiac transplant recipients within 5 years of surgery, prevention is a key focus for cardiac transplant teams today. CAV is caused by both immunologic mechanisms (e.g., acute rejection and anti-HLA antibodies) and non-immunologic mechanisms relating to the transplant itself or the recipient (e.g., donor age, hypertension, hyperlipidemia and pre-existing diabetes) or to the side effects often associated with immunosuppression with calcineurin inhibitors or corticosteroids (e.g., cytomegalovirus infection, nephrotoxicity and new-onset diabetes after transplantation). The calcineurin inhibitors, cyclosporine and tacrolimus, effectively prevent acute rejection, but do not prevent the development of CAV. CAV prevention will require a combined approach of new adjunct immunosuppressant agents (e.g., the proliferation signal inhibitors) and reduction in cardiovascular risk. Hypertension, hyperlipidemia and diabetes are also associated with the immunosuppression required to prevent organ rejection. Some studies have shown that hypertension is present more frequently in cyclosporine-treated patients than in tacrolimus-treated patients and that tacrolimus may be associated with a more favorable lipid profile. On the other hand, tacrolimus may be more diabetogenic than cyclosporine with current data suggesting a trend but no statistically significant supporting evidence. New-onset diabetes after transplantation is at times difficult to manage and may be an important determinant along with hypertension and hyperlipidemia of ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease and peripheral vascular disease. The choice of calcineurin inhibitor for an immunosuppressive regimen in heart transplantation should consider the associated relative cardiovascular risks.

Immunosuppression and transplant vascular disease: benefits and adverse effects

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) occurs within 5 years of transplantation surgery and represents the main cause of death in long-term heart transplant survivors. The detailed pathogenesis of CAV is unknown, but there are strong indications that immunologic mechanisms, which are regulated by nonimmunologic factors, are the major cause of this phenomenon. Cyclosporine A (CsA) is a frequently used immunosuppressive agent in transplant medicine to prevent rejection. The mechanism of action of CsA involves initial binding to cyclophilin to form a complex that then inhibits calcineurin (CN), leading to reduced interleukin (IL)-2 production as part of the signal transduction pathway for the activation of B-lymphocytes and T-lymphocytes. Based on this proposed mechanism, it was expected that CsA should be an effective strategy in attenuating the host immune response against transplanted allograft tissue; however, CsA has not changed the outcome of CAV. Several mechanisms have been suggested for the ineffectiveness of CsA in long-term prevention of CAV. For example, routine therapeutic doses of CsA may block CN incompletely (50%), whereas complete blockade requires doses that are not clinically tolerable. Another explanation is the possible activation of T-cell receptors directly (CN independent) by the immune response, which induces protein kinase C theta (PKCtheta) and leads to IL-2 production and immune rejection. Moreover, there may be a role for nonimmunologic mechanisms, such as complement, which cannot be controlled by CsA, or CsA may cause hypercholesterolemia or induce overexpression of transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta). This review also compares the effect of CsA with other immunosuppressants in allograft artery preservation and their clinical efficacy.

Delayed occurrence of cardiac allograft vasculopathy in Chinese heart transplant recipients compared with their western counterparts

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a leading limiting factor to long-term survival after cardiac transplantation. We investigated the prevalence of CAV and its associated factors in Chinese heart transplant recipients. From July 1987 to July 2000, we performed 140 consecutive heart transplantations at the National Taiwan University Hospital. Of the 140 patients, 98 who were > or = 17-yr old at the time of transplantation, had survived for more than 1 yr after transplantation, and who had normal findings at the 1-month coronary angiogram study, were included in this study. Group I consisted of 25 patients who eventually developed CAV in the follow-up, and group II consisted of 73 patients who were free from CAV in the follow-up. CAV was defined by coronary angiogram study.The donor and recipient characteristics were not statistically different between the two groups except the older donor age (p = 0.02), higher first-year mean rejection score (p = 0.03) and more prevalent cytomegalovirus infection rate (p = 0.03) in group I. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that only higher first-year mean rejection score (p = 0.01), and older donor age (p = 0.04) were important risk factors for developing CAV. The 1-5 yr of actuarial freedom from the presence of CAV were 97, 93, 86, 80 and 69% in our study patients. In summary, these data show that CAV occurred later in Chinese heart transplant recipients in comparison with their western counterparts, but the risk factors for developing CAV were not different.

Hyperhomocysteinemia and transplant coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Transplant coronary artery disease (TCAD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality among heart transplant recipients. A variety of immunologic and nonimmunologic mechanisms are involved in the pathogenesis of the disease. Hyperhomocysteinemia has been recognized as an important risk factor for atherosclerotic vascular disease. The purpose of this article is to evaluate the prevalence of hyperhomocysteinemia in heart transplant recipients but more specifically to assess the published literature regarding the association between hyperhomocysteinemia and TCAD.

METHODS

A MEDLINE search using the key words hyperhomocysteinemia, transplant coronary artery disease, and heart transplant was performed.

RESULTS

Hyperhomocysteinemia has been commonly found among heart transplant recipients (average prevalence 51% to 76%). Worsening renal function and impaired vitamin metabolism seem to be the major causes of hyperhomocysteinemia in this particular population. TCAD has been found to be more prevalent and severe among patients with higher serum homocysteine levels. Vitamin supplementation is safe and effective in reducing serum homocysteine among heart transplant recipients.

CONCLUSION

A large, long-term, double-blind, placebo-controlled prospective trial aimed at assessing the clinical significance of homocysteine-lowering therapy on the natural history of TCAD seems warranted.

Cold ischemia induces isograft arteriopathy, but does not augment allograft arteriopathy in non-immunosuppressed hosts

Prolonged cold ischemia has been suggested as a factor that will exacerbate later graft arterial disease (GAD), a major limiting factor for long-term transplant survival. We therefore examined the effects of cold ischemia on GAD as well as adhesion molecule and cytokine expression in murine cardiac grafts. Mild GAD developed in isografts undergoing 4-hour cold ischemia. Relative to control isografts, cold ischemia induced transiently enhanced endothelial expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) at 4 hours post-transplant. There was also transiently-augmented gene expression of interleukin (IL)-1beta, IL-6, and transforming growth factor-beta in these cold-ischemic isografts. By 3 days post-transplantation, however, there were no longer any differences between control and cold ischemic isografts. Cold ischemia did not significantly affect the final grade of either parenchymal rejection or GAD in long-term (4 to 12 weeks) major histocompatibility complex (MHC) I- or MHC II-mismatched allografts molecules transplanted without immunosuppression. At early time points after cold ischemia (4 to 24 hours), allografts mismatched for MHC I and/or MHC II showed enhanced expression of ICAM-1 and cytokines comparable to that seen in isografts. By day 7 post-transplant, both control and cold ischemia allografts showed comparable expression of cytokines and adhesion molecules. Although prolonged cold ischemia can initiate mild GAD in isografts by transiently enhancing antigen non-specific inflammatory responses, it does not significantly augment subsequent alloresponses.

Coronary endothelial dysfunction as a predictor of intimal thickening in the long term after heart transplantation

OBJECTIVES

The mechanisms of cardiac allograft vasculopathy and its predisposing factors are multifactorial and as yet not well established. To determine the influence of endothelial dysfunction on the development of intimal thickening, we prospectively analyzed the vasomotor response to acetylcholine and nitroglycerin, as well as other donor and recipient variables. Findings were correlated with the coronary intimal thickness, which was evaluated by means of intravascular ultrasonography.

METHODS

Nineteen patients who had undergone heart transplantation 4.89 +/- 2.35 years previously and who had angiographically normal coronary arteries were included. Endothelial function was analyzed by quantitative coronary analysis of the vasomotor response of the left anterior descending artery to acetylcholine. An intimal thickness index, reflecting the percentage of intima obstructing the coronary lumen, was calculated.

RESULTS

Nine (47%) patients showed endothelial dysfunction, and the remaining 10 (53%) patients had a normal response. Four (44%) of 9 patients with a weight gain of greater than 20% after the operation showed endothelial dysfunction compared with none of the 10 patients with normal responses (P <.04). The severity of the intimal thickness correlated with the years after transplant (r = 0.45, P <.05). Patients with endothelial dysfunction had more intimal thickening than those without (32% +/- 17% vs 17% +/- 12%, respectively; P <.05). Furthermore, the degree of intimal thickening correlated with the magnitude of the vasomotor response to acetylcholine (r = -0.60, P =.006). No relationship was found between intimal thickness and the vasodilatory response to nitroglycerin. As independent variables for intimal thickness, multivariate analysis detected the magnitude of the response to acetylcholine (P =.0005), years after transplant (P =.01), and ischemic time (P =.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy is a multifactorial disease the severity of which increases over time. Endothelial dysfunction is a predictive factor of intimal thickening severity. Predisposing factors that provoke endothelial injury, such as perioperative ischemic time and obesity, may contribute to the development of allograft vasculopathy.

Simvastatin treatment is associated with improvement in coronary endothelial function and decreased cytokine activation in patients after heart transplantation

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to assess the association between 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibition, coronary endothelial function and cytokine activation in heart transplant recipients without angiographically detectable disease.

BACKGROUND

Coronary endothelial dysfunction contributes to cardiac allograft vasculopathy. The vasoprotective effects of statins in heart transplant recipients may include restoration of endothelial function and suppression of allograft inflammatory activity.

METHODS

Heart transplant recipients (one to three years after heart transplant) were divided into three groups based on the total cholesterol levels: group 1 (n = 21), patients with a history of hypercholesterolemia adequately controlled with simvastatin; group 2 (n = 19), patients with hypercholesterolemia not adequately treated with simvastatin; and group 3 (n = 40), patients without hypercholesterolemia. Coronary vasomotor function and intimal thickness as well as coronary sinus and aortic cytokine concentrations (tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-alpha, interleukin [IL]-6 and soluble IL-2 receptor) were investigated. In a prospective one-year follow-up study, changes in coronary endothelial function and cytokine levels were compared between 11 hypercholesterolemic patients treated with simvastatin and 9 controls.

RESULTS

Epicardial and microvascular endothelial functions were better in groups 1 and 3 than they were in group 2 (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05). Transcardiac IL-6 and TNF-alpha gradients were significantly increased in groups 2 and 3 compared with group 1 (IL-6: p < 0.05; TNF-alpha: p < 0.01). Plaque areas were significantly increased in groups 1 and 2 (p < 0.05 vs. group 3), whereas lumen area was increased in group 2 compared with group 1 (p < 0.05), demonstrating adaptive vascular remodeling. In patients treated with simvastatin, coronary endothelial function and cardiac cytokine activity significantly improved during the one-year follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Inhibition of allograft inflammatory activity and attenuation of the coronary endothelial dysfunction observed in cardiac transplant recipients during treatment with simvastatin may represent an important mechanism by which HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors protect against the development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy.

Impact of vascular branching sites on focal progression of allograft vasculopathy in transplanted hearts

BACKGROUND

Cardiac allograft vascular disease (CAVD) represents one of the most accelerated progressing coronary syndromes in the human heart. A variety of risk factors have been identified over recent years; however, little is known about the influence of physical forces. As a model for differences in focal blood flow dynamics, we analyzed progression of intimal hyperplasia at vascular bifurcational sites using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).

METHODS

The most diseased vascular sites ("worst sites") in 59 coronary arteries were assessed (30 MHz, motorized pull back) in 25 consecutive heart transplant recipients at baseline (52.8+/-15.3 days postoperatively) and after 1 year of follow up (360.5+/-24.9 days). Progression of intimal hyperplasia was compared between branching and non-branching lesions as well as in focal relation to the position of the flow divider.

RESULTS

A total of 41 (69.5%) worst sites were identified at branching locations. Progression of intimal hyperplasia was found to be significantly more severe at bifurcational sites with an increase in plaque area by 1.5+/-1.8 mm(2) in branching versus 0.4+/-0.6 mm(2) in non-branching lesions (P=0.015). The highest rate in focal progression was found at the opposite site of the flow divider with an increase in maximal intimal thickness by 0.3+/-0.23 mm (180 degrees ) as compared to 0.11+/-0.15 mm (90 degrees, P<0.001) and 0.15+/-0.15 mm (P=0.014) at 270 degrees.

CONCLUSIONS

Using serial intravascular ultrasound examinations, vascular branching sites could be identified to be predisposing locations not only for a donor related arteriosclerosis, but also for progression of intimal hyperplasia within transplanted hearts. The highest regional increase in intimal thickness was found at the outer wall of the flow divider, suggesting focal shear or wall stress to be involved in pathogenesis.

Impact of lipid abnormalities in development and progression of transplant coronary disease: a serial intravascular ultrasound study

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine the role of conventional atherosclerosis risk factors in the development and progression of transplant coronary artery disease (CAD) using serial intravascular ultrasound imaging.

BACKGROUND

Transplant artery disease is a combination of allograft vasculopathy and donor atherosclerosis. The clinical determinants for each of these disease processes are not well characterized. Intravascular ultrasound imaging is the most sensitive tool to serially study these processes.

METHODS

Baseline intravascular ultrasound imaging was performed 0.9 +/- 0.5 months after transplantation to identify donor atherosclerosis. Follow-up imaging was performed at 1.0 +/- 0.07 year to evaluate progression of donor atherosclerosis and development of transplant vasculopathy. Conventional risk factors for CAD included recipient age, gender, smoking history, diabetes mellitus, hypertension and hypercholesterolemia.

RESULTS

Donor-transmitted atherosclerosis was present in 36 patients (39%). At follow-up, progression of donor lesions was seen in 15 patients (42%) and 42 patients (45%) developed transplant vasculopathy, leaving 35 patients (38%) without any disease. There was no difference in any conventional risk factors in patients with and without allograft vasculopathy. However, the severity of allograft vasculopathy was associated with a larger increase in low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol from baseline (p = 0.02). High one-year posttransplant serum triglyceride level and pretransplant body mass index were the only significant predictors (p = 0.03) for progression of donor atherosclerosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Conventional atherosclerosis risk factors do not predict development of allograft vasculopathy, but greater change in serum LDL cholesterol level during the first year after transplant is associated with more severe vasculopathy. Therefore, maintenance of LDL cholesterol as close to pretransplant values as possible may help to limit the rate of progression of acquired allograft vasculopathy.

Cellular rejection and rate of progression of transplant vasculopathy: a 3-year serial intravascular ultrasound study

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is established as the optimal method for early detection of transplant vasculopathy. The association between cellular rejection and development of transplant vasculopathy remains controversial. This study attempts to determine the rate of progression of transplant vasculopathy lesions and its relationship with cellular rejection in a long-term (> 1 year) IVUS serial follow-up.A study cohort of 47 patients undergoing heart transplantation from 1993 to 1995 was evaluated. Intravascular ultrasound was performed at baseline (within 8 weeks) and annually for a period of 3 years to determine maximum intimal thickness and maximum plaque area in each coronary segment. Significant allograft vasculopathy was defined as a site with intimal thickness > 0.5 mm not present at baseline. Biopsy results were scored by assigning a numerical weight to each ISHLT grade during the first year. Donor lesions ranged from 0.86 to 1.1 mm, showing no evidence of progression at serial follow-up. De novo lesions were identified in 30 patients. These lesions appeared yearly but progressed slowly. The average biopsy score in the entire cohort was 1.1 +/- 0.8. Average biopsy score was > 1.0 in 35 patients with significant linear correlation between the rate of intimal progression and biopsy score (r = 0.42, p = 0.01). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that only the biopsy score correlated with the rate of progression. Lesions of donor atherosclerosis do not change significantly after transplantation. However, de novo lesions continue to develop every year. In patients with evidence of rejection, the rate of progression of transplant vasculopathy correlates with the severity of rejection.

Cardiac transplant vasculopathy

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV) remains the major factor limiting long-term survival after heart transplantation. The purpose of this article is to review for the nontransplant physician the concept of CAV as a disease entity after heart transplantation.

DESIGN

A MEDLINE search from 1985 to 1999 was performed. Data on cardiac transplant vasculopathy were divided into pathology, pathophysiology, presentation, diagnosis, and treatment.

RESULTS

CAV manifests as a unique and unusually aggressive form of coronary artery disease that differs from traditional atherosclerosis. It is believed to be caused by immunologic mechanisms that combine with nonimmunologic factors to cause endothelial injury, resulting in smooth muscle proliferation and intimal thickening. This intimal hyperplasia leads to coronary obstruction, which ultimately results in allograft failure. Diagnosis of CAV can be difficult because transplant recipients have denervated hearts and rarely present with chest pain. Various noninvasive screening methods have not proved reliable. Therefore, most transplant centers perform periodic coronary angiography for routine CAV surveillance. Treatment of CAV involves modification of risk factors and the use of pharmacologic agents that alter vascular physiology. Revascularization procedures continue to play a role as palliative therapy, but are limited in their effectiveness by the diffuse nature of this disease.

CONCLUSION

Cardiac transplant vasculopathy continues to play a major dilemma regarding posttransplant care. Further research is needed to develop successful preventive and therapeutic strategies that may alter the course of this disease.

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy

Cardiac transplantation has emerged as a valuable therapy for various end-stage cardiac disorders. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), an unusually accelerated and diffuse form of obliterative coronary arteriosclerosis, determines long-term function of the transplanted heart. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy is a complicated interplay between immunologic and nonimmunologic factors resulting in repetitive vascular injury and a localized sustained inflammatory response. Dyslipidemia, oxidant stress, immunosuppressive drugs, and viral infection appear to be important contributors to disease development. Endothelial dysfunction is an early feature of CAV and progresses over time after transplantation. Early identification of CAV is essential if long-term prognosis is to be improved. Annual coronary angiography is performed for diagnostic and surveillance purposes. Intravascular ultrasound is a more sensitive diagnostic tool for early disease stages and has revealed that progressive luminal narrowing in CAV is in part due to negative vascular remodeling. Because of the diffuse nature of CAV, percutaneous and surgical revascularization procedures have a limited role. Prevention of CAV progression is a primary therapeutic goal.

Progression of cardiac allograft vascular disease as assessed by serial intravascular ultrasound: correlation to immunological and non-immunological risk factors

OBJECTIVE

To characterise the severity and progression of cardiac allograft vascular disease (CAVD) in a large patient cohort, and to evaluate possible immunological and non-immunological risk factors for progression.

DESIGN

A prospective observational study using intravascular ultrasound.

SETTING

Two university hospitals.

PATIENTS AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Changes in focal plaque, lumen, and total vessel area (worst site method) were assessed at baseline and after 12.1 (2.8) months (mean (SD)) of follow up in a cohort of 96 patients (79 male, 17 female; mean age 48.7 (9.6) years; time post-transplant 26.0 (32.4) months).

RESULTS

Overall, the mean (SD) intimal index of worst sites increased by 6.7 (8.8)%. The increase in the first 12 months was 7.5 (9.4)%, v 5.9 (8.0)% after the first year (NS). Analysing immunological and non-immunological risk factors (age, underlying disease, sex, donor age, immunosuppression, cytomegalovirus, rejection episodes, cholesterol), low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol was found to be the most important predictor of severe progression (as defined by an increase in intimal index of >/= 15% (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Progression of CAVD is characterised by a continuing increase in intimal hyperplasia, especially within the first year after heart transplantation. LDL cholesterol is an important predictor of major progression.