Clinical correlates of the rate of transmission of transmitral "A" wave to the left ventricular outflow tract in left ventricular hypertrophy secondary to systemic hypertension, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or aortic valve stenosis

Mitral valve coaptation and its relationship to late diastolic flow: A color Doppler and vector flow map echocardiographic study in normal subjects

BACKGROUND

Three competing theories about the mechanism of mitral coaptation in normal subjects were evaluated by color Doppler and vector flow mapping (VFM): (1) beginning of ventricular (LV) ejection, (2) "breaking of the jet" of diastolic LV inflow, and (3) returning diastolic vortices impacting the leaflets on their LV surfaces.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analyzed 80 color Doppler frames and 320 VFM measurements. In all 20 normal subjects, coaptation occurred before LV ejection, 78±16 ms before onset. On color Doppler frames the larger anterior, and smaller posterior vortices circle back and, in all cases, strike the ventricular surfaces of the leaflets. On the first closing-begins frame, for the first time, vortex velocity normal to the ventricular surface of the anterior leaflet (AML) is greater than that in the mitral orifice, and the angle of attack of LV vortical flow onto the AML is twice as high as the angle of flow onto the valve in orifice. Thus, at the moment coaptation begins, vortical flow strikes the mitral leaflet with higher velocity, and higher angle of attack than orifice flow, and thus with greater force. According to the "breaking of the jet" theory, one would expect to see de novo LV flow perpendicular to the leaflets beginning after transmitral flow terminates. Instead, the returning continuous LV vortical flow that impacts the valve builds continuously after the P-wave.

CONCLUSIONS

Late diastolic vortices strike the ventricular surfaces of the mitral leaflets and contribute to valve coaptation, permitted by concomitant decline in transmitral flow.

Clinical significance of a presystolic wave on Doppler examination of the left ventricular outflow tract

A presystolic wave (PSW) is commonly seen on Doppler examination of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), but is little studied. We conducted a retrospective study to assess the prevalence of the PSW, correlations with various Doppler parameters, and its clinical significance. Two hundred echocardiograms, 100 with ejection fraction (EF) >55% and 100 with EF <45%, were reviewed. Mitral inflow velocities, septal annular velocities, LVOT, and PSW velocities were measured. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE [death, heart failure hospitalization, atrial fibrillation, and stroke]) were compared between those with and without a PSW, in both EF groups. Mean age was 58 ± 15 years; 56% were men and 69% were African-American. PSW prevalence was similar between normal (68%) and reduced EF groups (62%). However, its velocity was less in the low EF group (37 ± 10 vs 48 ± 16 cm/s, p <0.0001). In subjects with normal EF PSW velocity correlated with mitral A velocity (rho = 0.43, p = 0.0003). In subjects with reduced EF the association with A velocity was not significant (rho = 0.22, p = 0.09), but there was a significant association with annular a' velocity (rho = 0.38, p = 0.002). Over a mean follow-up of 1.7 ± 0.3 years, 57 subjects (28%) experienced MACE. Those without a PSW had more MACE (39% vs 23%, p = 0.02); PSW absence remained predictive of MACE after adjustment for multiple variables, especially in patients with reduced EF. In conclusion, PSW is common in the LVOT. Its presence and magnitude are associated with measures of atrial contraction. Its absence is associated with increased rates of adverse events, especially in patients with low EF.

Diastolic function in hypertension

Diastolic dysfunction in patients with hypertension may present as asymptomatic findings on noninvasive testing, or as fulminant pulmonary edema, despite normal left ventricular systolic function. Up to 40% of hypertensive patients presenting with clinical signs of congestive heart failure have normal systolic left ventricular function. In this article we review the pathophysiologic factors affecting diastolic function in individuals with diastolic function, current and emerging tools for measuring diastolic function, and current concepts regarding the treatment of patients with diastolic congestive heart failure.

Diastolic flow pattern in the normal left ventricle

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to clarify the diastolic flow pattern in the normal left ventricle.

BACKGROUND

During left ventricular filling, basally directed (retrograde) velocities are seen in the outflow compartment. These velocities may represent blood returned from the apical region or a shortcut at a more basal level.

METHODS

Left ventricular flow patterns were identified in 18 healthy individuals (age 47 +/- 12 years) with the use of high frame-rate two-dimensional color Doppler and color M-mode Doppler echocardiography techniques. Intraventricular velocities were measured with single pulsed Doppler at 3 levels in both inflow and outflow compartments (posterolateral and anteroseptal parts of the left ventricle).

RESULTS

During early transmitral flow acceleration, all intraventricular velocities were directed towards the apex. However, after peak early and late inflow velocities and during diastasis, retrograde velocities were identified in the outflow compartment. These retrograde velocities occurred earlier, and were higher, at the level of the deflected anterior mitral leaflet tip compared with more apical levels (P <.001). A velocity pattern was established, consistent with early intraventricular vortex formation behind both mitral leaflets. The vortex adjacent to the anterior leaflet subsequently enlarged to include a major part of the left ventricle.

CONCLUSION

Uniform diastolic flow patterns were identified in the normal left ventricles. The findings suggest that both early and late diastolic filling start with an initial motion of a fluid column, succeeded by vortex formation, which explains retrograde flow in the outflow compartment.

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and echocardiography--noninvasive techniques for evaluation of the hypertensive patient

Clinic blood pressure measurements have only limited ability to determine which hypertensive patients are at greatest risk of cardiovascular events. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring allows for noninvasive measurement of blood pressure throughout the 24-hour period. This may help to clarify discrepancies between blood pressure values obtained in and out of the clinic and confirm the presence of white-coat hypertension, broadly defined as an elevated clinic blood pressure but a normal ambulatory blood pressure. Ambulatory blood pressure values have been shown to have a better relationship to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality and end-organ damage than clinic blood pressure values. Further, patients with white-coat hypertension appear to be at greater risk of cardiovascular morbidity and end-organ damage than a normotensive population, although they are at less overall risk than a hypertensive population. Hypertensive heart disease is characterized by diastolic dysfunction, increased left ventricular mass, and coronary flow abnormalities. Left ventricular hypertrophy increases the risk of coronary heart disease, congestive heart failure, stroke, ventricular arrhythmias, and sudden death. A variety of invasive and noninvasive techniques are described herein that measure left ventricular mass, diastolic function, and coronary blood flow abnormalities. Most antihypertensive treatments promote regression of left ventricular hypertrophy and reversal of diastolic dysfunction, which may decrease symptoms of congestive heart failure and improve survival.

A semi-automated method to quantify left ventricular diastolic inflow propagation by magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping

A new method of analysis was used for clinical magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping (PVM) to quantify propagation speed (PS) of early diastolic left ventricular (LV) inflow. A group of older volunteers (OV; n = 21, age 58+/-11 years) and a group of aortic stenosis patients (AS; n = 21, age 69+/-8 years) were studied. PVM was used to measure diastolic inflow in the LV outflow tract plane. PS was quantified by a semi-automated method (Auto) and by an operator (Manual). The mean+/-SD PS was 0.71+/-0.21 (Auto) and 0.67+/-0.23 (Manual) m/sec in the OV group, versus 0.49+/-0.28 (Auto) and 0.43+/-0.18 m/sec (Manual) in the AS group. There were no differences in peak transmitral E-wave (P = 0.70) between OV and AS. However, there were differences in PS-Auto (P = 0.0079) and PS-Manual (P = 0.0007) between the two groups. PS is a promising index for identifying diastolic LV dysfunction in AS patients. The semi-automated technique is a practical approach for quantifying LV filling.

Transventricular pressure-velocity wave propagation in diastole: adherence to the Moens-Korteweg equation

In the latter half of the diastolic phase of the cardiac cycle, the left atrium contracts and generates a pressure-velocity wave which enters the left ventricle. The wave moves through the inflow tract of the ventricle, reflects off the apex and heads towards the aortic valve. The time taken for the pressure-velocity wave to propagate through the ventricle, referred to as the A-Ar interval, may be measured using pulsed Doppler echocardiography and occurs in the range 20-80 ms. It has been shown previously that there is a significant negative linear correlation between the A-Ar interval and the passive elastic modulus of the ventricular wall (r = -0.782, p < 0.001). This relationship may be explained by modelling the left ventricle as a folded-over elastic tube through which the pressure-velocity wave is propagated according to the principles of the Moens-Korteweg equation.

Clinical and echocardiographic correlates of mitral E-wave transmission inside the left ventricle: potential insights into left ventricular diastolic function

The mitral inflow wave is initially directed to the left ventricular apex and then turns around facing the left ventricular outflow tract. The E and A waves are transmitted to the left ventricular outflow tract where they are registered as Er and Ar waves, respectively. We hypothesized that the E-wave transit time to the left ventricular outflow tract recorded as the E-Er interval may depend on left ventricular early diastolic performance such as relaxation. This hypothesis was tested in clinical settings known to have abnormal left ventricular relaxation. Mitral E and left ventricular outflow tract Er waves were recorded with pulsed wave Doppler technique in 63 subjects: 25 healthy subjects, 18 patients with secondary left ventricular hypertrophy, and 20 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. The E-Er interval was measured from the onset of E wave to the onset of Er wave timed to the R wave of the electrocardiogram. The E-Er interval ranged from 45 to 300 msec: 96 +/- 28 msec in the controls, 127 +/- 46 msec in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (p = 0.0091 versus controls), and 179 +/- 57 msec in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (p < 0.0001 versus controls). It correlated with left ventricular free wall thickness (r = 0.42, p = 0.0006), thickness of the ventricular septum (r = 0.43, p = 0.0004), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (r = -0.38, p = 0.0022), left ventricular end-systolic diameter (r = -0.55, p < 0.0001), left ventricular isovolumic relaxation time (r = 0.39, p = 0.0063), RR interval (r = 0.28, p = 0.045), mitral E/A velocity ratio (r = -0.33, p = 0.010), and E-wave deceleration time (r = 0.38, p < 0.0044) but not with age. Multivariate analysis with all the previously mentioned variables and the group the patient belonged to as the dichotomous variable showed that the grouping variable was the sole independent determinant of the E-Er interval (multiple r = 0.74). The E-Er interval is an easily measurable Doppler parameter which is increased in left ventricular hypertrophy and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. It is related to left ventricular wall thickness, left ventricular isovolumic relaxation time, mitral E/A velocity ratio, and E-wave deceleration time and may provide useful insight into left ventricular early diastolic performance-possibly the relaxation process.

Correlation of end-diastolic pressure and myocardial elasticity with the transit time of the left atrial pressure wave (A-Ar interval)

Contraction of the left atrium in diastole generates a pressure wave that moves along the postero-lateral wall of the left ventricle (LV), rebounds off the LV apex, and is then directed toward the outflow tract. The movement of this atrial pressure wave may be detected with pulsed Doppler echocardiography by placing a sample volume in the LV outflow tract. The resulting spectral profile shows the initial. A velocity wave and also the Ar velocity wave, which is caused by the atrial pressure wave rebounding off the LV apex. The transit time from the inflow tract to the outflow tract of the atrial pressure wave (A-Ar interval) may be determined from the time axis of the spectral profile by measuring the peak-to-peak separation of the A and Ar, velocity waves. It occurs in the range 25 to 80 milliseconds. The primary determinant of the A-Ar interval is the elasticity of the LV myocardium. We correlated ventricular elasticity with the A-Ar interval in 47 patients and found a significant negative linear correlation (r = -0.782, p < 0.001). Because the pressure in a viscoelastic conduit such as the LV is determined by the elasticity of the ventricular wall, we correlated end-diastolic pressure with the A-Ar interval and again showed a significant negative linear correlation (r = -0.701, p < 0.001). The A-Ar interval is an easily measured noninvasive index of the diastolic function of the LV that reflects its intrinsic elasticity and end-diastolic pressure. It is therefore a quantitative measurement of LV wall stiffness and end-diastolic pressure.

Newer Doppler measures of left ventricular diastolic function

Left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction is an important cause of heart failure, and recent advances in the application of Doppler techniques allow a semiquantitative assessment of LV diastolic performance. This review discusses the use of Doppler echocardiography in the comprehensive assessment of LV diastolic function and performance in terms of the normal mitral and pulmonary venous flow profiles, their physiologic basis, and alterations in diseased states. There is also a discussion on the newer aspects of mitral flows such as relative durations of mitral A and pulmonary vein AR waves, E- and A- wave propagation inside the LV with their hemodynamic correlates, and derivation of ventricular dP/dt and Tau from the mitral regurgitation velocity profile. Analysis of these flow profiles and the other Doppler measures alluded to above allow one to make a fairly precise hemodynamic assessment of a patient in terms of left atrial pressure, LV relaxation and stiffness and the profile of LV diastolic pressure in terms of pre- 'a' wave and 'a' wave pressures and ventricular end-diastolic pressure.

Doppler diastolic filling indexes in relation to disease states

This study compares mean Doppler-derived diastolic filling indexes in a variety of disease states in a large, population-based sample. Pulse-wave Doppler was used to examine 880 eligible participants of the Framingham Heart Study. Peak velocity of early flow and late flow, ratio of early to late peak velocities, atrial filling fraction, and early filling wave acceleration and deceleration times were obtained. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed comparing mean values for individuals with hypertension, diabetes, coronary disease, cardiovascular disease, and pulmonary disease. Hypertension was associated with a greater peak velocity late flow (0.027 m/sec; 95% confidence interval, 0.006, 0.047; p = 0.011), and diabetes was associated with a larger mean deceleration time (0.12 sec, confidence interval, 0.002, 0.021; p = 0.016). In multivariate analyses, hypertension continued to show a strong association with altered Doppler diastolic filling patterns, p value 0.009, whereas in diabetes, the multivariate p value was 0.28.