Acute perforation of colonic diverticula associated with prolonged adrenocorticosteroid therapy

Surgical management in immunosuppressed patients with sigmoid diverticulitis, still a challenge: a single-center observational study

PURPOSE

The question of whether immunosuppressed (IS) patients should be offered elective sigmoidectomy following a single episode of diverticulitis is controversial. We intended to examine the perioperative outcome of IS and immunocompetent (IC) patients after sigmoid resection.

METHODS

A single institutional cohort study was conducted, including all surgically treated patients with sigmoid diverticulitis between 2004 and 2021. IS and IC patients were further subdivided into emergency and elective cases. Morbidity and mortality in both groups and factors influencing surgical outcome were examined using uni- and multivariate regression analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 281 patients were included in the final analysis. Emergency surgery was performed on 98 patients while 183 patients underwent elective sigmoid resection. Emergency sigmoidectomy demonstrates significantly higher morbidity and mortality rates in IS patients as compared to IC patients (81.81% vs. 42.1%; p = 0.001, respectively 27.27% vs. 3.94%; p = 0.004), while major morbidity and mortality was similar in both groups in the elective setting (IS: 23.52% vs. IC: 13.85%; p = 0.488, respectively IS: 5.88% vs. IC: 0%; p = 1). On multivariate regression analysis for major postoperative morbidity, ASA score [OR 1.837; (95% CI 1.166-2.894); p = 0.009] and emergency surgery under immunosuppression [OR 3.065; (95% CI 1.128-8.326); p = 0.028] were significant. In-hospital mortality was significantly related to age [OR 1.139; (95% CI 1.012-1.282); p = 0.031], preoperative CRP count [OR 1.137; (95% CI 1.028-1.259); p = 0.013], and immunosuppression [OR 35.246; (95% CI 1.923-646.176), p = 0.016] on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Elective surgery for sigmoid diverticulitis in immunocompromised patients demonstrates higher efficacy and safety when compared to sigmoid resection in the emergency setting.

Colon perforation in multiple myeloma patients - A complication of high-dose steroid treatment

Gastrointestinal complications of multiple myeloma (MM) treatment are common and include nausea, constipation, and diarrhea. However, acute gastrointestinal events like perforations are rare. We aimed to describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients with MM that had colonic perforations during their treatment. This is a retrospective study that included patients from all three Mayo Clinic sites who had MM and developed a colonic perforation. All patients were diagnosed with colonic perforations based on CT scans and were surgically treated. Patients diagnosed with AL amyloidosis, a perforated colon complicating neutropenic colitis during ASCT and those with perforation due to colonic cancer were excluded. A high dose of dexamethasone was defined as ≥40 mg dexamethasone once a week. Thirty patients met inclusion criteria. All patients received steroids at doses ≥10 mg once weekly prior to the perforation, while four (11%) were on high-dose dexamethasone without chemotherapy. Fourteen patients were given high doses of dexamethasone. Twenty-five patients required ostomies with all surviving surgery. Twenty-four perforations (80%) were associated with diverticulitis. Treatment with steroids was resumed in 23 patients with no further gastrointestinal complications. The median OS was 20 months following perforation (IQR 8-59). Within the same timeframe 5854 patients were treated at Mayo Clinic for MM, making the risk of bowel perforation 0.5%. Intestinal perforations in MM are rare and, in our series, always occurred with dexamethasone ≥10 mg per week. Urgent surgery is lifesaving and resumption of anti-myeloma treatment appears to be safe.

Operative management of colonic diverticular disease in the setting of immunosuppression: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Immunosuppressed patients with diverticular disease are at higher risk of postoperative complications, however reported rates have varied. The aim of this study is to compare postoperative outcomes in immunosuppressed and immunocompetent patients undergoing surgery for diverticular disease.

METHODS

Medline, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched. Articles were included if they compared immunosuppressed and immunocompetent patients undergoing surgery for diverticular disease.

RESULTS

From 204 citations, 11 studies with 2,977 immunosuppressed patients and 780,630 immunocompetent patients were included. Mortality was greater in immunosuppressed patients compared to immunocompetent patients for emergent surgery (RR 1.91, 95%CI 1.24-2.95, p < 0.01), but not elective surgery (RR 1.70, 95%CI 0.14-20.47, p = 0.68). Morbidity was greater in immunosuppressed patients compared to immunocompetent patients for elective surgery (RR 2.18, 95%CI 1.02-4.65, p = 0.04), but not emergent surgery (RR 1.40, 95%CI 0.68-2.90, p = 0.37).

CONCLUSIONS

Increased consideration for elective operation may preclude the need for emergent surgery and the associated increase in postoperative mortality.

Intestinal necrosis related to administration of cation exchange resin without sorbitol: A retrospective analysis of 61 patients with end-stage renal diseases

Intestinal necrosis associated with cation exchange resin (CER) is considered related to sorbitol, but it has been reported even in patients receiving CER alone. This study was performed to identify the risk factors of CER-related intestinal necrosis. The pathological database of 61 end-stage renal disease patients with surgical intervention for intestinal perforation was reviewed. The correlations between CER treatment and clinicopathological factors were studied among three groups: (i) patients administered CER and with CER at the perforation site (n = 23), (ii) patients administered CER with undetected CER at the perforation site (n = 12) and (iii) patients not administered CER (n = 26). The majority of the perforation site in group 1 was in the sigmoid colon (82.6%) with significantly higher average age and more frequent CER adhesion rates to the mucosa around the perforation site than group 2. The laxative administration rate in group 1 was significantly higher than group 3 and tended to be higher than group 2. The incidence of CER-related intestinal necrosis was estimated at 0.57%. CER should be used with extreme caution in elderly patients with passage disturbance.

Association between diverticular disease requiring surgical intervention and mortality in the postlung transplant population - a retrospective cohort study

Lung Transplant recipients are at increased risk of complicated diverticular disease. We aim to assess the rate of diverticular surgery in a postlung transplantation population and identify risk factors for surgery. We performed a retrospective cohort study of lung transplant recipients from 2007 to 2011. Demographic variables were evaluated with the Mann-Whitney U and chi-squared tests. Cox regression was performed to evaluate 1- and 2-year landmark survival, assess predictor variables of diverticular surgery and evaluate impact of surgery on CLAD development. Of 17 of 158 patients (10.7%) underwent diverticular-related surgery. Surgical patients had significantly worse survival than nonsurgical patients at 1 year [aHR 2.93 (1.05-8.21), P = 0.041] and 2 year [aHR 4.17 (1.26-13.84), P = 0.020] landmark analyses. Transplant indication of alpha-1 antitrypsin disease and cystic fibrosis were significantly associated with the need for diverticular surgery. Emergent surgery was associated with poorer survival [aHR 5.12(1.00-26.27), P = 0.050]. Lung transplant patients requiring surgery for complicated diverticular disease have significantly poorer survival than those who do not require surgery. Surgery was more common in patients transplanted for A1AT and CF. Optimal assessment and risk stratification of diverticular disease is necessary to prevent excessive morbidity and mortality following transplantation.

Intestinal Perforation in ACTH-Dependent Cushing's Syndrome

Previous studies have linked systemic glucocorticoid use with intestinal perforation. However, the association between intestinal perforation and endogenous hypercortisolism has not been well described, with only 14 previously published case reports. In this study, we investigated if intestinal perforation occurred more frequently in patients with ectopic ACTH syndrome and in those with a greater than 10-fold elevation of 24-hour urinary free cortisol level. Of 110 patients with ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome followed in two clinics in Canada, six cases with intestinal perforation were identified over 15 years. Age of patients ranged from 52 to 72, five females and one male, four with Cushing's disease and two with ectopic ACTH production, one from a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor and one from medullary carcinoma of the thyroid. Five had diverticular perforation and one had intestinal perforation from a stercoral ulcer. All cases had their lower intestinal perforation when the cortisol production was high, and one patient had diverticular perforation 15 months prior to the diagnosis of Cushing's disease. As in previously reported cases, most had hypokalemia and abdominal pain with minimal or no peritoneal symptoms and this occurred during the active phase of Cushing's syndrome. Whereas all previously reported cases occurred in patients with 24-hour urinary free cortisol levels greater than 10-fold the upper limit of normal when measured and 11 of 14 patients had ectopic ACTH production, only one of our patients had this degree of hypercortisolism and four of our six patients had Cushing's disease. Similar to exogenous steroid use, patients with endogenous hypercortisolism also have a higher risk of intestinal, in particular diverticular, perforation and should be monitored closely for its occurrence with a low threshold for investigation and surgical intervention. Elective colonoscopy probably should be deferred until Cushing's syndrome is under control.

Sigmoid Colectomy for Acute Diverticulitis in Immunosuppressed vs Immunocompetent Patients: Outcomes From the ACS-NSQIP Database

BACKGROUND

The management of acute diverticulitis in immunosuppressed patients is increasingly debated. The appropriate timing and type of operation remains controversial.

OBJECTIVE

This study examines the impact of immunosuppression on mortality and morbidity following colectomies for diverticulitis in the emergency and elective settings.

DESIGN SETTINGS

With the use of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, the outcomes of immunosuppressed compared with immunocompetent patients who underwent colectomy for acute diverticulitis were compared.

PATIENTS

The multi-institutional database was queried for patients who underwent colectomy for acute diverticulitis from 2005 to 2012.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

The impact of immunosuppression on mortality, major morbidity, organ space infection, infectious complications, and wound dehiscence was assessed.

RESULTS

Of 26,987 patients, 1332 were immunosuppressed and 25,655 were immunocompetent; 4271 patients had emergency (596 immunosuppressed and 3675 immunocompetent) and 22,716 patients had elective (736 immunosuppressed and 21,980 immunocompetent) colectomies for diverticulitis. In both groups, mortality and major morbidity were significantly higher in the emergency (immunosuppressed 16% and 45%, immunocompetent 4% and 28%) compared with the elective setting (immunosuppressed 2% and 25%, immunocompetent 0.4% and 12%), p < 0.001. On multivariate regression for the emergency setting, immunosuppression significantly increased mortality (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.17-2.75) and did not significantly increase morbidity. On multivariate regression for the elective setting, mortality was similar in immunosuppressed and immunocompetent groups; however, major morbidity (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.17-1.83) and wound dehiscence (OR, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.63-4.42) were significantly increased in immunosuppressed compared with immunocompetent patients.

LIMITATIONS

The retrospective design and standardized outcomes are based on heterogeneous data.

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency colectomy for diverticulitis is associated with higher mortality in immunosuppressed than in immunocompetent patients, whereas elective colectomy is associated with comparable mortality. In the elective setting, immunosuppressed compared with immunocompetent patients are at increased risk of major morbidity and wound dehiscence.

Risk Factors for Diverticulosis, Diverticulitis, Diverticular Perforation, and Bleeding: A Plea for More Subtle History Taking

Background

Diverticulosis is a very common condition. Around 20% of diverticula carriers are believed to suffer from diverticular disease during their lifetime. This makes diverticular disease one of the clinically and economically most significant conditions in gastroenterology. The etiopathogenesis of diverticulosis and diverticular disease is not well understood. Epidemiological studies allowed to define risk factors for the development of diverticulosis and the different disease entities associated with it, in particular diverticulitis, perforation, and diverticular bleeding.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was performed, and the current knowledge about risk factors for diverticulosis and associated conditions reviewed.

Results

Non-controllable risk factors like age, sex, and genetics, and controllable risk factors like foods, drinks, and physical activity were identified, as well as comorbidities and drugs which increase or decrease the risk of developing diverticula or of suffering from complications. In naming risk factors, it is of utmost importance to differentiate between diverticulosis and the different disease entities.

Conclusion

Risk factors for diverticulosis and diverticular disease may give a clue towards the possible etiopathogenesis of the conditions. More importantly, knowledge of comorbidities and particularly drugs conferring a risk for development of complicated disease is crucial for patient management.

Operative management of acute diverticulitis in immunosuppressed compared to immunocompetent patients: A systematic review

AIM: To determine short and long-term outcomes following operative management of acute diverticulitis in immunosuppressed (IMS) compared to immunocompetent (IMC) patients.

METHODS: PRISMA guidelines were followed in conducting this systematic review. We searched PubMed (1946 to present), OVID MEDLINE(R) In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, OVID MEDLINE(R) Daily and OVID MEDLINE(R) (1946 to present), EMBASE on OVID platform (1947 to present), CINAHL on EBSCO platform (1981 to present), and Cochrane Library using a systematic search strategy. There were no restrictions on publication date and language. We systematically reviewed all published cohort comparative studies, case-control studies, and randomized controlled trials that reported outcomes on operative management of acute episode of colonic diverticulitis in IMS in comparison to IMC patients.

RESULTS: Seven hundred and fifty-five thousand five hundred and eighty-three patients were included in this systematic review; of which 1478 were IMS and 754105 were IMC patients. Of the nine studies included there was one prospective cohort, seven retrospective cohorts, one retrospective case-control study, and no randomized controlled trials. With the exception of solid organ transplant patients, IMS patients appeared to be older than IMC when they presented with an acute episode of diverticulitis. IMS patients presented with more severe acute diverticulitis and more insidious onset of symptoms than IMC patients. In the emergency setting, peritonitis was the main indication for operative intervention in both IMS and IMC patients. IMS patients were more likely to undergo Hartmann’s procedure and less likely to undergo reconstructive procedures compared to IMC patients. Furthermore, IMS patients had higher morbidity and mortality rates in the emergency setting compared to IMC patients. In the elective settings, it appeared that reconstruction with primary anastomosis with or without a diverting loop stoma is the procedure of choice in the IMS patients and carried minimal morbidity and mortality equivalent to IMC patients.

CONCLUSION: Emergency operations for diverticulitis in IMS compared to IMC patients have higher morbidity and mortality, whereas, in the elective setting both groups have comparable outcomes.

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Is Safe in Patients Before and After Lung or Heart Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal complications are common in patients after lung and heart transplantation. Endoscopy is a standard method for the assessment of gastrointestinal morbidities. The aim of this study was to analyze the number and type of complications during endoscopic procedures in patients before and after lung or heart transplantation.

METHODS

A retrospective single centre analysis of endoscopic procedures in patients before and after lung and heart transplantation from May 1999 to September 2012 was performed compared to a control group.

RESULTS

Four hundred fifty-nine endoscopic procedures were performed in 175 patients after transplantation (84 lung and 91 heart) and 213 procedures in 160 transplant candidates on the waiting list for lung (n = 126) or heart (n = 34) transplantation. In 26% (n = 56/214) of the endoscopic examinations, an intervention was necessary in the lung transplant group compared to 32% (n = 79/245) in the heart transplant group and 27% (n = 43/160) and 21% (n = 11/53) in the lung and heart transplant candidates, respectively. In the control group, endoscopic interventions were performed in 24% (n = 195/805) of the examinations. Overall, 14 (1%) complications resulted from 1,477 endoscopic examinations. Only four (0.9%) of 459 endoscopic examinations were followed by complications in the transplant recipients, whereas in the control group, 10 complications (1.2%) of 805 endoscopies were documented. No endoscopic complication occurred in the lung and heart transplant candidates.

CONCLUSION

Diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopies can be safely performed after lung and heart transplantation and in patients on the waiting list for these organs.

The impact of abdominal complications on the outcome after thoracic transplantation--a single center experience

BACKGROUND

Abdominal complications after thoracic transplantation (Tx) are potentially associated with an increased risk of mortality. We recently reported about the severe outcome after bowel perforation in patients following lung transplantation (LuTx). The aim of the present study was to likewise identify the risk factors with an impact on patient survival following heart transplantation (HTx).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis for the frequency and outcome of abdominal interventions following HTx was performed in 342 patients, and these data thereafter compared to a re-evaluated pool of 1,074 patients following LuTx. All patients were transplanted at Hanover Medical School, Germany, between January 2000 and October 2011.

RESULTS

The incidence for abdominal surgery was comparable between patients following HTx (n = 33; 9.6 %) and LuTx (n = 90; 8.4 %). Elective operations were more frequently performed in patients after HTx (8.5 vs. 5.1 %). In contrast, the incidence of emergency interventions was higher after LuTx (5.3 %) than that following HTx (2.3 %). Herewith associated was the mortality observed in these transplant recipients (15.3 and 9.9 % for LuTx and HTx, respectively). Leading diagnosis for emergency surgery was bowel perforation (n = 18, regarding all cases). In 11 of these patients, perforation occurred within the first 6 months after Tx and eight of them died in the course of this complication (one patient after HTx and seven patients after LuTx).

CONCLUSIONS

Abdominal complications after HTx are less frequently than after LuTx but equally correlate with a high mortality rate. In finding or even reasonable suspicion of an acute abdomen after thoracic Tx, a broad practice for extended diagnostics and a low barrier for an early explorative laparotomy thus are recommended.

Risk factors for severe diverticulitis in computed tomography-confirmed acute diverticulitis in Korea

Background/Aims

Acute complicated diverticulitis can be subdivided into moderate diverticulitis and severe diverticulitis. Although there have been numerous studies on the risk factors for complicated diverticulitis, little research has focused on severe diverticulitis. This study was designed to identify the risk factors for severe diverticulitis in an acute diverticulitis attack using the modified Hinchey classification.

Methods

Patients were included if they had any evidence of acute diverticulitis detected by computed tomography. The patients were subdivided into severe diverticulitis (Hinchey class ≥Ib; abscesses or peritonitis) and moderate diverticulitis (Hinchey class Ia; pericolic inflammation) groups.

Results

Of the 128 patients, 25 exhibited severe diverticulitis, and 103 exhibited moderate diverticulitis. In a multivariate analysis, age >50 years (odds ratio [OR], 5.27; p=0.017), smoking (OR, 3.61; p=0.044), comorbidity (OR, 4.98; p=0.045), leukocytosis (OR, 7.70; p=0.003), recurrence (OR, 4.95; p=0.032), and left-sided diverticulitis (OR, 6.92; p=0.006) were significantly associated with severe diverticulitis.

Conclusions

This study suggests that the risk factors for severe diverticulitis are age >50 years, smoking, comorbidity, leukocytosis, recurrent episodes, and left-sided diverticulitis.

Incidence and outcome of abdominal surgical interventions following lung transplantation--a single center experience

PURPOSE

Abdominal complications after lung transplantation (LuTx) are associated with a high mortality risk. Aim of the present study was to analyse frequency and outcome of abdominal interventions following LuTx.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of the requirement of abdominal surgery including data of 754 patients undergoing LuTx at the Hannover Medical School, Germany, between January 2000 and December 2008.

RESULTS

In the course of lung transplantation, 55 patients (7%) were in need of surgical interventions due to abdominal complications. Following LuTx, 35 individuals were operated in 43 cases of emergency indication. The leading diagnosis was bowel perforation (n = 10) with surgery performed 10.4 months after LuTx, although 7 of 10 patients were operated within the first 4 weeks post-transplantation. Emergency interventions were associated with a mortality rate of 28%, 42% thereof after bowel perforation. Elective surgical treatments (n = 31) were diverse and had no influence on mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Early abdominal complications after LuTx correlate with a high mortality rate. Perforation of the bowel was the leading diagnosis with a severe impact on the outcome. Thus, in cases of an acute abdomen after LuTx, we recommend the broad use of further diagnostic measures as well as an early decision for explorative laparotomy.

Diverticulitis in transplant patients and patients on chronic corticosteroid therapy: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The clinical course of diverticular disease in immunosuppressed patients is widely believed to be more severe than in the general population. In this study we systematically reviewed the literature regarding the epidemiology and clinical course of diverticulitis in immunosuppressed patients. Our goal was to develop recommendations regarding the care of this group of patients.

METHODS

Using PubMed and Web of Knowledge we systematically reviewed all studies published between 1970 and 2009 that analyzed the epidemiology, clinical manifestation, or outcomes of treatment of diverticulitis in immunosuppressed patients. Keywords of "transplantation," "corticosteroid," "HIV," "AIDS," and "chemotherapy" were used.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies met our inclusion criteria. All of these studies focused on the impact of diverticulitis in patients with transplants or on chronic corticosteroid therapy. The reported incidence of acute diverticulitis in these patients was approximately 1% (variable follow-up periods). Among patients with known diverticular disease the incidence was 8%. Mortality from acute diverticulitis in these patients was 23% when treated surgically and 56% when treated medically. Overall mortality was 25%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study summarizes evidence that patients with transplants or patients on chronic corticosteroid therapy 1) have a rate of acute diverticulitis that is higher than the baseline population and 2) a mortality rate with acute diverticulitis that is high. Further research is needed to define whether these risks constitute a mandate for screening and prophylactic sigmoid colectomy.

Comorbidity is a major determinant of severity in acute diverticulitis

BACKGROUND

Acute colonic diverticulitis may be simple or very complicated. Not much is understood about what factors determine severity. Answering this question may have therapeutic implications.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed consisting of teaching hospital admissions for simple or complicated acute diverticulitis. The intent was to identify characteristics of and differences between the 2 groups. The Charlson index was used to assess states of preexisting health (comorbidity).

RESULTS

In multivariate analysis, the presence of a major degree of comorbidity (Charlson score 3 or greater) was strongly associated with complicated disease (P = 0.02) as was the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (P = .01). Deaths were not seen below age 50, and high Charlson score also strongly predicted mortality (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

There are significant differences between patients presenting with simple and complicated diverticulitis, and the amount of associated comorbidity (as measured by Charlson score) appears to be a major one. Because of the high mortality seen in patients with Charlson scores 3 or greater and complicated diverticulitis, we believe that an early surgical approach should be considered for them, particularly if they are 50 or older.

Developments in Glucocorticoid Therapy

Recent evidence for a disease-modifying potential of low-dose glucocorticoids (GCs) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis has renewed the debate on the risk benefit ratio with this therapy. Two recent developments are described that might have a positive influence on these risk benefit ratios. One is the improvement in new GC compounds--designer GCs, alterations in bioactivity, and alterations in formulations. The other is a better understanding and management of the toxicity of GCs.

A very rare consequence of steroid therapy: ileal perforation in a patient with familial mediterranean fever

Intestinal perforation rarely occurs in children with familial Mediterranean fever (FMF). When this does happen, it is the result of untreated intestinal obstruction caused by compression from peritoneal adhesions. Intestinal perforation is a well-known complication of steroid therapy in all ages. The duodenum is affected most frequently, but perforation may also occur in other parts of the small intestine and, very rarely, the colon. Intestinal wall changes that occur in chronic FMF may promote the harmful effects of steroids. Here we present an unexpected complication, ileal perforation, in an 8-year-old boy who was taking prednisolone for FMF-related arthritis.

Recent advances in diverticular disease

Diverticulosis is the most common structural abnormality of the colon. Although most people with colonic diverticula remain asymptomatic, a significant proportion of those affected develop symptoms and may suffer from complications. Whereas early research in diverticular disease addressed the pathogenesis of the condition, recent work has focused on symptomatic or complicated disease. Recent epidemiologic studies have attempted to identify patients who are at increased risk of perforated diverticular disease, and developing knowledge in neurogastroenterology has suggested mechanisms responsible for underlying chronically symptomatic disease. Further research in these areas has the potential to provide targeted therapeutic strategies for people with colonic diverticula.

Anti-inflammatory drugs, analgesics and the risk of perforated colonic diverticular disease

BACKGROUND

Acute perforated colonic diverticular disease has a mortality rate of up to 30 per cent, but little is known about its aetiology. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that three classes of drugs, namely non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), opioid analgesics and corticosteroids, are risk factors for perforated diverticular disease.

METHODS

All patients with confirmed perforated colonic diverticular disease were identified over a 5-year period in two hospitals in Norfolk, UK. Two control groups were selected and matched for age, sex and hospital of admission. Data on medication use were obtained from hospital records. Odds ratios for each drug were calculated using conditional logistic regression.

RESULTS

Opioid analgesics, NSAIDs and corticosteroids were all positively associated with perforated colonic diverticular disease. The odds ratio for opioid analgesics was 1.8 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 1.1 to 3.0) in the analysis with ophthalmology controls and 3.1 (95 per cent c.i. 1.8 to 5.5) in that with dermatology controls. Respective odds ratios for NSAIDs were 4.0 (95 per cent c.i. 2.1 to 7.6) and 3.7 (95 per cent c.i. 2.0 to 6.8), and those for corticosteroids were 5.7 (95 per cent c.i. 2.2 to 14.4) and 7.8 (95 per cent c.i. 2.6 to 23.3).

CONCLUSION

Opioid analgesics, NSAIDs and corticosteroids are all positively associated with perforated colonic diverticular disease. The consistency of these associations, together with plausible biological mechanisms, suggests that these drugs may have a causative role in this condition.

Epidemiology of perforated colonic diverticular disease

Perforated colonic diverticular disease results in considerable mortality and morbidity. This review appraises existing evidence on the epidemiology and mechanisms of perforation, highlights areas of further study, and suggests an epidemiological approach towards preventing the condition. Computerised searches were used to identify published articles relating to the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical features of perforated colonic diverticular disease. Several drug and dietary exposures have potential biological mechanisms for causing perforation. Of these only non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have been consistently identified as risk factors in aetiological studies. The causes of perforated colonic diverticular disease remain largely unknown. Further aetiological studies, looking specifically at perforation, are required to investigate whether cause-effect relationships exist for both drug and dietary exposures. The identification of risk factors for perforation would allow primary public health prevention, secondary risk factor modification, and early prophylactic surgery to be aimed at people at high risk.

Gastrointestinal complications in lung transplant survivors that require surgical intervention

BACKGROUND

Lung transplantation is widely accepted as a treatment for end-stage lung disease. At present, information regarding the incidence and outcome of acute gastrointestinal complications in lung transplant survivors is limited.

METHODS

Since 1990, 127 lung transplantations have been performed in 125 patients: 73 males (58 per cent) and 52 females (42 per cent) of median age 43 (range 9-64) years. Patients received a standard induction and maintenance regimen of immunosuppression.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 2.6 (range 0-8.6) years the overall survival rate was 68 per cent. An acute abdomen requiring surgical intervention was diagnosed in 12 patients (10 per cent). The median time following lung transplantation was 19 (range 3-68) months. Eight cases of bowel perforation, two of appendicitis, one of colitis, one of cholecystitis, and one pneumoperitoneum were encountered. Four Hartmann procedures, two sigmoid resections, one small bowel resection, two appendicectomies, a subtotal colectomy, a cholecystectomy and an exploratory laparotomy were performed with minimal morbidity and no postoperative death.

CONCLUSION

Lung transplant survivors are at increased risk of developing an acute abdomen because of the use of high-dose immunosuppressive agents. Physicians who evaluate lung transplant patients for an acute abdomen should have a low threshold for surgical intervention.

Postoperative gastrointestinal complications after lung volume reduction operations

BACKGROUND

Lung volume reduction operations have been shown to improve the quality of life and functional status of some patients with end-stage emphysema.

METHODS

Because of a perceived increase in the occurrence of postoperative gastrointestinal (GI) complications, we reviewed our experience in 287 patients who had lung volume reduction operations to determine the frequency of GI complications and to identify risk factors.

RESULTS

Using a broad definition of postoperative GI complications (nausea, vomiting, abdominal distension, gastroesophageal reflux, diarrhea, constipation) there were 137 complications in 67 patients (23%). More severe GI complications (bowel ischemia, GI bleeding, perforation, ulceration, ileus, colitis, cholecystitis, pancreatitis) occurred 49 times in 27 patients (9.4%). Seven of the 27 patients required abdominal operations. Risk factors identified as predictive of severe complications include diabetes (p = 0.0003), lower preoperative hematocrit (p = 0.01), steroid use (p = 0.02), and use of parenteral meperidine analgesic (p = 0.002). Stepwise logistic regression demonstrated that diabetes was 7.02 times more likely to produce severe complications. Other risk factors included steroids (2.81), number of different pain medications (2.59), hematocrit decrease of 5% (1.96), and hematocrit decrease of 1% (1.14). In the patients with severe GI complications there were six of 27 (22%) hospital deaths compared with five of 260 (2%) in those without GI complications (p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Severe GI complications in patients with emphysema who had lung volume reduction operations are not uncommon (9.4%) and influence the perioperative mortality rate. Heightened awareness to identified risk factors will allow earlier recognition, prevention, and perhaps decrease morbidity and mortality rates in these high-risk patients.

[Complications of colonic diverticular disease during rheumatoid polyarthritis: 7 cases]

INTRODUCTION

Among the gastrointestinal adverse effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) and corticoids are mentioned complications of colonic diverticular disease. However, very few studies have described their consequences in rheumatoid arthritis.

EXEGESIS

We report on seven patients who were admitted in our department between 1984 and 1997. All patients received corticoids and another antirheumatic drug (gold salts, hydroxychloroquine, immunosuppressive drugs); treatment also included NSAID in four cases. Two patients had a necrotizing vasculitis accompanying rheumatoid arthritis. Intestinal accompanying diseases were the following: one diverticulitis, three colonic perforations with pelviperitonitis, one colovesical fistula, one pelvic abscess, and one diverticular hemorrhage. All patients underwent surgery with positive results.

CONCLUSION

Combination of the four following symptoms: fever, abdominal pain, diarrhea, and hemorrhage, can uncover a complication of colónic diverticular disease occurring in the course of rheumatoid arthritis. It should be investigated, even if no history of diverculosis may be evidenced.

Complicated diverticulitis following renal transplantation

PURPOSE

Colonic perforations in renal transplant recipients have historically been associated with mortality rates as high as 50 to 100 percent. However, these previous series generally predate the use of cyclosporine-based immunosuppressive protocols.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients who had undergone renal transplant from our institution and who developed complicated diverticulitis. Complicated diverticulitis was defined as diverticulitis involving free perforation, abscess, phlegmon, or fistula. Factors analyzed included the time interval since transplantation, use of cyclosporine, living-related vs. cadaveric donor, cause of renal failure, and presenting signs and symptoms.

RESULTS

Between August 1969 and September 1996, 1,211 kidney transplants were performed in 1,137 patients. The first 388 patients (1969-1984) received prednisone and azathioprine, with cyclosporine added to the immunosuppressive regimen for the subsequent 823 recipients (1984-1996). Thirteen (1.1 percent) patients had episodes of complicated diverticulitis, occurring from 25 days to 14 years after transplant; all required surgical therapy. Clinical presentation was highly variable, ranging from asymptomatic pneumoperitoneum (2 patients) to generalized peritonitis. There was one perioperative mortality (7.7 percent). Patients with polycystic kidney disease as the cause of renal failure had a significantly higher rate of complicated diverticulitis. Specifically, patients with polycystic kidney disease (9 percent of the total transplant population) accounted for 46 percent of the cases of diverticulitis (P < 0.001, Fisher's exact probability test). Neither treatment with cyclosporine nor donor source had a significant effect on the rate of diverticular complications (P = 0.36 and P = 0.99, respectively, Fisher's exact probability test).

CONCLUSION

Complicated diverticulitis following renal transplantation is rare, and the clinical presentation may be atypical in the immunosuppressed transplant recipient. Patients with polycystic kidney disease experience a significantly higher rate of complicated diverticulitis than do other transplant patients and, therefore, warrant aggressive diagnostic evaluation of even vague abdominal symptoms. In addition, pretransplant screening and prophylactic sigmoid resection in this high-risk population deserve consideration and further study.

Perforated diverticulitis following extra-abdominal surgery

The peritonitis of perforated diverticular disease is a life-threatening condition. We report three cases where it occurred following unrelated extra-abdominal surgery and where surgical intervention proved to be the correct course of management. All cases were treated with a Hartmann's procedure; this is probably the safest option for purulent peritonitis in patients who are a high operative risk and have recently undergone major surgery.

Colon perforation after lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

Colon perforation has been previously described after solid organ transplantation. Since the inception of the lung transplant program at the University of Colorado 60 isolated lung transplantations have been performed. Four of these patients have suffered spontaneous colonic perforation.

METHODS

The case history of each lung transplant patient with a colon perforation and the literature were reviewed.

RESULTS

An increased incidence of colon perforation in lung transplant patients was identified. Diverticulitis was found to be the predominant cause, and an association with steroids was noted. The two deaths in this series were in patients receiving high-dose steroids in whom invasive Aspergillus infections developed.

CONCLUSIONS

Careful screening of the gastrointestinal tract before transplantation is advocated. A steroid-sparing immunosuppressive regimen is recommended. All lung transplant patients with abdominal complaints require an aggressive work-up, and surgeons should have a low threshold for laparotomy. Conservative surgical principles, including resection of the perforated segment of colon and proximal end-colostomy rather than primary anastomosis, are necessary for the optimal outcome.

Acute diverticulitis in heart transplant recipients

Immunosuppressed patients are susceptible to complicated diverticulitis, but reports of this complication are scarce in heart graft recipients. To estimate the prevalence of acute diverticulitis in heart graft recipients, we retrospectively reviewed the cases of diverticulitis in a series of 143 patients who underwent orthotopic heart transplantation in a period of 10 years. Six (4%) of these developed acute diverticulitis and required colectomy. All of them were male patients and were older than 50 years. Four patients underwent urgent laparotomy and colon resection with end colostomy (Hartmann procedure). The two other patients suffered from diverticulitis without generalized peritonitis and underwent laparoscopic sigmoidectomy with direct transanal end-to-end anastomosis. The postoperative outcomes of these six patients were satisfactory. As are other immunosuppressed patients, heart graft recipients are susceptible to diverticulitis. Early surgical management may be safe in well-compensated patients.

[Perforation of colonic diverticulum under corticoids: a complication to be known and recognized]

Glucocorticoids can produce acute perforation of colonic diverticula and peritoneal infection. We report two observations in which patients presented a peritoneal collection with no specific clinical signs. The diagnosis was considered after C-T scan or ultrasans. Residues of contrast liquid, after an earlier X-ray exploration, have made the diagnosis of diverticula easier. In one case, corticosteroids were started as a short cure for the treatment of a myeloma. In the other case, patient received a long term corticosteroid therapy at low dose for an asthmatic disease. The perforation was induced by an increased dosage. Diverticular perforations result from inhibition of synthesis of prostaglandins who have the beneficial property of "cytoprotection" and from the immunosuppressive action of glucocorticoids which favour the diffusion of the peritoneal infection. diffusion of the peritoneal infection.

Diverticular disease. Epidemiology and pharmacological treatment

Diverticular disease is worldwide in distribution, but the incidence is highest in industrialised countries. It is associated with aging and low intake of dietary fibre. There is a broad range of clinical manifestations--from asymptomatic diverticula to life-threatening complications. Elderly patients often present with complicated diverticular disease, and may lack typical symptoms and signs. Treatment includes fibre supplementation, drugs or antibiotics for complications, and surgery for refractory disease. Proper diagnosis and treatment requires knowledge of the full range of presentations and careful selection and timing of medical versus surgical intervention.

Sigmoid diverticular perforation in neurosurgical patients receiving high-dose corticosteroids

Perforation of colonic diverticula is a complication of corticosteroid use that has not been described in the neurosurgical literature. Between 1987 and 1992, 719 patients who underwent surgery for primary and metastatic brain and spinal tumors of the central nervous system received 2246 to 4936 mg of methylprednisolone given over at least 7 days. Five patients in this group (all men, ages 50-69 yr) experienced a sigmoid diverticular perforation at a mean dose of 3947 mg of methylprednisolone (range, 2240-6160 mg). Of these five, two had a known history of diverticular disease. In contrast, during this same period, 3749 patients who underwent neurosurgical procedures for non-neoplastic conditions did not receive corticosteroids and experienced no colonic perforations. All five patients with colonic perforations presented with abdominal pain and had free intraperitoneal air that was revealed on radiographs of the abdomen. Perforation of a sigmoid diverticulum was confirmed in all five at exploratory laparotomy. Four patients had good outcomes, and one died. We conclude the following: 1) patients over age 50 who receive high-dose corticosteroids are at risk for sigmoid colonic perforation, and these medications should be used with caution in such patients; 2) if possible, lower total doses of perioperative corticosteroids should be used in patients with known diverticular disease; and 3) because corticosteroids mask many of the inflammatory signs of perforation, this diagnosis should be considered in any patient with abdominal discomfort, fever of unknown origin, or unexplained leukocytosis.

Unusual gastrointestinal complications in neurosurgery

Nine neurosurgical patients with unusual gastrointestinal complications are presented. Their diagnostic clinical features, as well as pitfalls in their diagnosis are highlighted. A high index of clinical suspicion of these unusual complications is important as patients' decreased level of consciousness and concomitant steroid therapy often complicates the clinical presentation. Progressive abdominal distension and absent or sluggish bowel sounds were the most consistent clinical features in comatose patients with peritonitis, whereas, high fever and markedly elevated white cell counts were often absent.

The efficacy and safety of low-dose corticosteroids for rheumatoid arthritis

Low-dose corticosteroids (defined as less than or equal to 10 mg/d of prednisone or equivalent) are used increasingly for the management of rheumatoid arthritis. They are frequently substituted for nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), particularly in patients with gastrointestinal or other intolerance to NSAIDs, or as "bridge therapy" while patients await the benefits of delayed-acting, disease-modifying agents. Despite their clinical acceptance, published data concerning efficacy are meager. Adverse effects to low-dose corticosteroids are not so frequent nor so severe as those that occur with higher doses. Nevertheless, alterations in glucose metabolism, cutaneous atrophy, cataracts, and glaucoma are common. Osteoporosis, steroid-myopathy, a steroid-withdrawal syndrome, and dysfunction of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis appear in some patients. Osteonecrosis, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, infectious, or neurological complications probably do not occur. Fetal wastage, prematurity, or congenital malformations have not been proven with this dosage.

Diverticular complications of renal failure

Ten patients with chronic renal failure presented with complications of colonic diverticula. Five had acute diverticulitis, 4 perforated diverticula, and 1 lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Symptoms were less severe than expected. In 3 the diagnosis was first suspected when free intra-abdominal air was detected. Seven patients had laparotomy, 5 emergently. Radiologists should be aware of the potential for diverticular complication in patients with renal failure, even with minimal or absent symptoms. Suspicion of colonic pathology either clinically or radiographically should be evaluated promptly so that aggressive therapy can begin.

Acute postoperative diverticulitis

Acute diverticulitis following surgery is a severe condition reported previously only after heart surgery. Four cases of diverticulitis in the early postoperative period are presented, three of them after non-cardiac procedures (tracheostomy, inguinal hernia repair and laminectomy). Advanced age, administration of morphine, treatment with steroids, postoperative constipation and intestinal mucosal ischaemia are discussed as possible aetiological factors leading to diverticular perforation. Although the diagnosis is often difficult, early treatment offers the best chance of survival.

Bowel perforation in a patient receiving prednisolone for myasthenia gravis

Images

Perforated diverticulitis in a Hartmann rectal pouch

The Hartmann procedure is the surgical treatment of choice for perforated diverticulitis. Modifications leaving a long rectal pouch or mucous fistula and a variable length of bowel that contains inactive diverticula have been described. A steroid-dependent patient presented with perforated diverticulitis in residual disease in the Hartmann rectal pouch ten months after initial sigmoid resection for a perforated diverticulum. Because steroid-treated patients are at high risk for complications and recurrent disease, all diseased bowel should be resected during the initial procedure.

Perforation of the colon in the immunocompromised patient

Perforation of the colon in the immunocompromised patient is a catastrophic and usually fatal event. The immunocompromised patient, like all patients, may suffer from the more common causes of colonic perforation, including diverticulitis, chronic inflammatory bowel disease, presence of a foreign body, and trauma. There also appears to be in these patients the unusual occurrence of spontaneous perforation, particularly in patients with renal allografts or on dialysis. In a retrospective multi-hospital review, 10 cases of apparent spontaneous perforation were found. The pathogenesis is unclear, but predisposing factors include immunosuppressive medications, uremia, discrete colon ulcerations, and fecal impaction. The reported mortality rate approaches 100 percent due to delayed recognition and impaired host defense mechanisms. In our patients, mortality was 40 percent. We attribute this improved survival to prompt surgical intervention and aggressive postoperative management, including daily dialysis, parenteral hyperalimentation, broad-spectrum antibiotics, and a high index of suspicion for ongoing sepsis with early repeat exploration.

Oral glucocorticoids and their complications. A review

Glucocorticoid preparations form one of the cornerstones of the modern medical pharmacopeia. This class of medications has been especially useful to dermatologists, who are purported to be among its most prolific users. Oral glucocorticoids, available now for over 30 years, are prescribed to over 7% of hospitalized patients. Of this group, some 17% may experience adverse effects. It behooves any physician who uses these powerful agents to be aware of the potential complications and side effects. In this article we have undertaken to summarize and discuss selective examples of this rapidly growing segment of the literature.

Perforation of the colon in renal homograft recipients. A report of 11 cases and a review of the literature

Colon perforation in renal transplant recipients is a potentially lethal condition that is amenable to appropriate medical and surgical treatment. The 11 cases seen at the Cleveland Clinic (incidence 1.1% of all renal transplant patients) and previous reports in the literature have been reviewed. The pathogenesis is related to a high incidence of diverticular disease in patients with polycystic kidneys and/or chronic renal failure, the effects of long-term immunosuppression, and the transplant procedure itself. The high mortality of this condition (61% overall) is related to the effects of immunosuppression on the response to sepsis and the surgical procedure used. Mortality has fallen from 88% (1970-1974) to 53% (1975-1979), and there are indications that it is continuing to fall. All four cases operated on here since 1980 have survived, giving a total operative mortality of 2/6, and all have maintained excellent allograft function. A high clinical index of suspicion, prompt exteriorization of the perforated colon, reduction of immunosuppression to minimal levels, and effective antibiotic coverage have all contributed to the declining mortality.

Sigmoid diverticulitis with perforation and generalized peritonitis

Sigmoid diverticulitis with perforation and generalized peritonitis is a grave complication of diverticular disease. To compare accurately the results of two operative approaches--proximal colostomy with drainage and proximal colostomy with resection or exteriorization--the authors assessed the clinical and pathologic features of 121 consecutive patients with perforating sigmoid diverticulitis. There were no differences between treatment groups in age, sex, mean duration of symptoms, clinical presentation, number of coexistent diseases, type of peritonitis or chronic corticosteroid use. Overall mortality for emergency operation was 12 percent. Mortality was significantly greater (P less than 0.05) among the 31 patients treated by colostomy and drainage (26 percent) than among the 90 patients treated by colostomy and resection or exteriorization (7 percent). Seven of the nine patients who died from persistent sepsis had undergone colostomy and drainage. Four clinical factors were found to be predictive of mortality (P less than 0.05): persistent postoperative sepsis, fecal peritonitis, preoperative hypotension, and prolonged duration of symptoms. These factors identified a subgroup of patients who, because of an increased risk of death, would be likely to benefit from the more complete eradication of the septic focus that is achieved by colostomy and resection.