Induction chemotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Pemetrexed in first-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

Pemetrexed is an antitumor agent traditionally used as monotherapy for the second-line treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as well as in combination with cisplatin for the treatment of chemonaïve patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma. Recently, pemetrexed has been approved in combination with cisplatin for the first-line treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC other than predominantly squamous cell histology. Studies that support the development of this indication are detailed in this review. We performed a PubMed/Medline database search to identify relevant literature from 1998 until August 2008. Bibliographies from identified references were searched, as well as were abstracts from the most relevant congresses in lung cancer area (American Society of Clinical Oncology Congress, World Conferences of Lung Cancer). We detailed pemetrexed studies in the first-line setting of NSCLC treatment, in monotherapy, in combination with platinum and also, with other agents. Data regarding efficacy differences related to different histologic types were also analyzed.

Should aggressive surgery ever be part of the management of small cell lung cancer?

CMT with surgery and chemotherapy is feasible, the toxicity is manageable, and postoperative morbidity and mortality rates are acceptable. Patient selection is important, and the results of the LCSG trial indicate that surgical resection will not benefit most patients who have limited SCLC. The chances of long-term survival and cure are strongly correlated with pathologic TNM stage. Consideration of surgery for patients who have SCLC should be limited to those with stage I disease and perhaps some patients with stage II tumors. Therefore, before surgery is undertaken, patients should undergo extensive radiologic staging with CT, MRI, and perhaps even positron emission tomographic scanning and mediastinoscopy, even if the radiologic assessment of the mediastinum is negative. Surgery may be considered for patients with T1-T2 NO SCLC tumors, and whether it is offered as the initial treatment or after induction chemotherapy remains controversial [40,43]. If SCLC is identified unexpectedly at the time of thoracotomy, complete resection and mediastinal lymph node resection should be undertaken, if possible. Chemotherapy is recommended postoperatively for all patients, even those with pathologic stage I tumors. Surgery likely has very little role to play for most patients with stage II disease and virtually no role for patients with stage III tumors. Even though chemotherapy can result in dramatic shrinkage of bulky mediastinal tumors, the addition of surgical resection does not contribute significantly to long-term survival for most patients, as shown conclusively by the LCSG trial. The final group of patients who may benefit from surgical resection are those with combined small cell and non-small cell tumors. If a mixed-histology cancer is identified at diagnosis, the initial treatment should be chemotherapy to control the small cell component of the disease, and surgery should be considered for the non-small cell component. For patients who demonstrate an unexpectedly poor response to chemotherapy, and for patients who experience localized late relapse after treatment for pure small cell tumors, a repeat biopsy should be performed. Surgery may be considered if residual NSCLC is confirmed.

Lung function changes and pulmonary complications in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer treated with gemcitabine/cisplatin as part of combined modality treatment

INTRODUCTION

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality. Chemotherapy, ideally a platinum-based regimen as part of combined modality treatment, is appropriate for selected patients with locally advanced stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have a good performance status. However, chemotherapy can induce side effects including lung function changes.

AIM OF THE STUDY

Retrospective analysis of lung function changes in 44 patients with stage III NSCLC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) followed by surgery and/or radiotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

NCT consisted of three cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin. The following data were analysed: age, sex, the presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), smoking behaviour, response, complications after surgery and/or radiotherapy, and VC, FEV(1), DL(co) and K(co) before and after chemotherapy. DL(co) values were corrected for haemoglobin concentrations.

RESULTS

We found a significant decline of K(co) (-13.5% of pred; 95% CI: -16.6 to -10.4; P<0.0001), independent of tumor response or presence and severity of COPD. FEV(1) and FEV(1)/VC showed significant increases irrespective of tumor response. Significantly more pulmonary complications were recorded in the radiotherapy group after NCT (P=0.009) compared to patients who underwent surgical therapy after NCT.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients diagnosed with NSCLC stadium III who were treated with NCT consisting of cisplatin and gemcitabine showed a significant decline of DL(co) and K(co), irrespective of tumor response, presence and severity of COPD, sex and number of cycles of chemotherapy. Significantly more pulmonary complications were seen in patients treated with NCT and radiotherapy compared with patients treated with NCT and surgery. Questions concering the pathophysiological mechanisms of lung function changes and long term follow-up of pulmonary toxicity due to NCT remain still unanswered and have to be subject of future studies.

Phase II trial of induction high-dose chemotherapy followed by surgical resection and radiation therapy for patients with marginally resectable non-small cell carcinoma of the lung

The combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel is an active regimen in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Historically, patients with stage III disease have manifested higher response rates than patients with metastatic disease, and patients achieving a pathologic complete response to induction chemoradiation therapy prior to surgery have shown better long-term outcome. Based upon our pilot data using high-dose carboplatin and paclitaxel, we designed a phase II trial in patients with marginally resectable stage IIIA NSCLC. Ten patients, with bulky nodal stage IIIA disease, initially received etoposide (2 g/m2) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to mobilize peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC). Two cycles, 28 days apart, of carboplatin (AUC 12 in seven patients; AUC 16 in three patients) and paclitaxel (250 mg/m2) were administered with filgrastim (5 microg/kg) and PBSC support. After re-evaluation, patients underwent a thoracotomy followed by radiotherapy (44-60 Gy) if deemed resectable, or radiotherapy alone (60 Gy) if not resectable. The median age was 58.5 years (48-66) with a median ECOG performance status of 0 (0-1). Histology was adenocarcinoma in seven patients; the remainder had either squamous cell, large cell or bronchoalveolar carcinoma. Based on CT radiography, the overall response rate was 40%. Eight of ten patients underwent resection with four right pneumonectomies, three right upper lobectomies and one wedge resection of the right upper lobe. Six patients had a complete resection. Of eight patients resected, four were downstaged by induction therapy, three remained unchanged and one was found to have more extensive disease. The remaining two patients developed metastatic disease while receiving chemotherapy. The median dose of postoperative radiotherapy was 54 Gy (35-66 Gy). Actual median follow-up for all patients was 89 weeks (25 to 136+). The actuarial median overall survival was 124 weeks (25 to 136+) and time to progression was 57 weeks (17 to 136+). The median dose of carboplatin delivered expressed as mg/m2 was 779 (615-1540). Neutropenic fever occurred in two patients during the initial mobilization cycle only. The median number of units of RBC and/or platelets transfused was 0 (0-2 and 0-6, respectively). There were no significant non-hematologic toxicities. High-dose induction chemotherapy with stem cell rescue is feasible and safe with an acceptable response rate. Thoracotomy, including pneumonectomy and postoperative radiotherapy, were well tolerated by patients after undergoing high-dose induction chemotherapy with no apparent increase in peri-operative morbidity. The pathologic complete response rate was low--one out of ten patients. These results indicate that dose escalation of induction chemotherapy does not improve response rates even in this highly selected patient population. Accordingly, the complexity and potential toxicity of high-dose chemotherapy, as delivered in this trial as neoadjuvant treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, is not warranted.

The role of induction therapy in the management of resectable non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Combined-modality therapy has become standard for many patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Although surgical resection offers the best chance for long-term survival, the limited number of resectable patients and the presence of occult micrometastatic disease has limited the effectiveness of this modality alone.

METHODS

The authors reviewed several trials involving the use of induction chemotherapy in managing resectable non-small cell lung cancer.

RESULTS

Extensive phase II experience in patients with stage III disease has confirmed the feasibility of this approach. Unfortunately, heterogeneous patient populations and treatment regimens limit the ability to draw firm conclusions from these trials alone. While the phase III experience has been limited, long-term follow-up is now available suggesting that induction therapy may have a beneficial impact on survival, especially for those patients who can be sufficiently downstaged. Recent phase II trials have included stage III patients who have traditionally been considered inoperable. Although encouraging, the role of surgery after chemoradiotherapy for this population of patients remains undefined.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from ongoing randomized trials studying the impact of induction therapy on well-defined patient populations will be necessary before the optimal regimen and patient population can be identified.

Neoadjuvant etoposide, ifosfamide, and cisplatin followed by concomitant thoracic radiotherapy and continuous cisplatin infusion in stage IIIb non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

To determine the applicability and safety of an ifosfamide, cisplatin, and etoposide (VIP) regimen as a neoadjuvant chemotherapy to a concomitant thoracic radiotherapy and cisplatin continuous infusion in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-four patients (stage IIIb in 43 and stage IIIa in 1) entered a study of VIP, followed by concomitant thoracic radiotherapy and cisplatin continuous infusion. Chemotherapy consisted of three courses of cisplatin 25 mg/m2, ifosfamide 1.5 g/m2 (with uroprotection), and etoposide 100 mg/m2 given on days 1 to 4 of a 21-day cycle with hematopoietic support using recombinant human methionyl granulocyte colony stimulating factor. Patients who achieved a response or a stabilization were planned to receive a split-course normofractionated thoracic radiotherapy (first course: 30 Gy/10; 4-week rest period; second course: 25 Gy/10). A continuous cisplatin infusion of 6 mg/m2 daily was administered using an autonomous chemotherapy delivery device. Total plasma platinum titration was performed daily during the two courses in five of the patients. Analyses were done on an intent-to-treat basis.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine of the 44 patients received the three-cycle chemotherapy program. Received dose intensity was 82%. Thirty-eight patients received the radiotherapy and, among them, 35 received the complete concomitant continuous cisplatin infusion. Objective (complete) response rates were 48% (7%) at the end of chemotherapy and increased up to 61% (16%) by the end of radiotherapy. At the end of the first radiotherapy cycle, the mean total plasma platinum concentration was twice as high as that of the residual postinduction chemotherapy concentration. During induction chemotherapy, myelosuppression was the limiting toxicity requiring hospital readmission in 23 patients. During radiotherapy, the main toxicity was acute esophagitis. A relatively high rate of pulmonary fibrosis was observed using the subjective objective management analytic--late effects of normal tissue score without life-threatening pulmonary function impairment. None of the patients died from toxic reactions. Probability of survival at 1, 2, and 3 years was 49%, 19%, and 5%, respectively. Primary cause of failure was a local relapse in 63% of the patients, brain metastases in 24%, and hematogeneous metastases to other sites in 13%.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant VIP followed by concomitant radiotherapy-chemotherapy is feasible, but the split-course radiotherapy did not prevent a high rate of local recurrences. The high rate of toxic reactions requiring hospital readmission limits further development of such an aggressive regimen in NSCLC.

Randomized study of chemotherapy and surgery versus radiotherapy for stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer: a National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study

Thirty-one patients with stage IIIA (N2) non-small-cell lung cancer were randomized to receive radiotherapy alone or chemotherapy with cisplatin and vinblastine followed by surgery. Response rates to induction chemotherapy and radiotherapy were 50% and 53.3% respectively. Complete surgical resection was possible for 62.5% of patients. Median survival times were 16.2 and 18.7 months for radiotherapy alone and chemotherapy-surgery respectively (P = Ns), with no long-term improvement in survival seen with combined-modality treatment.

Clinical prognostic factors in surgically treated stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer: analysis of the literature

There remains controversy on the prognostic value of several common clinical factors in NSCLC patients with resected N2-disease. The aim of this paper is to give a comprehensive overview of the available data on this issue. Literature data on surgically treated N2-NSCLC-patients from 1980-1995, peer reviewed and listed in Index Medicus, were analysed. Reported and calculated or estimated survival data were indexed. Eighteen series were selected: in 12 of them, direct comparisons between survival curves of subgroups are reported; six contained sufficient data to make comparisons of survivors at 5 years; three of them also made a multivariate Cox model. The analysis of prognostic factors in a single study was often hampered by the limited number of patients. Nonetheless, it could be concluded that patients with a clinical N0- or N1-status (so-called unforeseen N2) do better. There was no clear difference between patients undergoing lobectomy or pneumonectomy. There was strong evidence that N2-patients with a less advanced primary tumour (T-stage) have a better prognosis, and this is the case for all operable T-stages (T1 versus T2, T1 versus T3, T2 versus T3). Squamous cell type was a favourable prognostic factor, as was the presence of only one metastatic mediastinal lymph node station or absence of metastases to the subcarinal nodes. There was some evidence that the presence of extracapsular spread in metastatic MLN is an unfavourable finding. Stratification for these prognostic factors could help in the planning of future trials on combined modality treatment in N2-NSCLC.

[Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) stage IIIA/IIIB. A pilot study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin]

There is evidence that neoadjuvant chemotherapy may improve treatment results in patients with locally advanced NSCLC. The aim of the present study was to increase resectability rates by induction chemotherapy in NSCLC stage IIIA/IIIB with the new cytostatic combination, paclitaxel and carboplatin. Neoadjuvant treatment consisted of 3 cycles (q21) of chemotherapy with paclitaxel (200 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (AUC 6). Seven patients with IIIA (T3N2, N-stage confirmed by mediastinoscopy) and 16 patients with IIIB (T4N0-2) entered the study. The response to chemotherapy was as follows: IIIA: 3x partial remission (PR), 2x no change (NC), 2x progressive disease (PD); IIIB: 5x PR, 4x NC, 7x PD. Five patients (71%) with IIIA and 8 patients (50%) with IIIB underwent thoracotomy with complete (R0) tumor resection. In all cases, the pT-stage was lower than the pretherapeutic T-stage. The most relevant adverse effect of chemotherapy was leukopenia WHO-grade 1-2. These data suggest that in many patients with T3N2 and in some patients with primarily unresectable T4N0-2 a neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin leads to high response rates allowing a high complete resection rate.

Mediastinal lymph node staging with FDG-PET scan in patients with potentially operable non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective analysis of 50 cases. Leuven Lung Cancer Group

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare the performance of CT, radio-labeled 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) blinded to CT, and FDG-PET visually correlated with CT, in the detection of N2 metastatic mediastinal lymph nodes (MLN) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to hypothesize how PET could influence our actual mediastinal staging procedures.

SETTING

Tertiary university hospital.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In 50 patients with potentially operable NSCLC, thoracic CT, PET, and invasive surgical staging were performed. Blinded prospective interpretation was performed for each test and compared with surgical pathology results. Abnormalities on each of these staging examinations were recorded on a standard MLN map.

RESULTS

The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in detecting N2 disease of CT was 67%, 59%, and 64%, respectively. Results of PET blinded to CT were significantly better (p=0.004): 67%, 97%, and 88%, respectively. For PET visually correlated with CT, this was 93%, 97%, and 96%, respectively. In 22 patients, both CT and PET were normal, and this was correct in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

PET was significantly more accurate than CT in the MLN staging in NSCLC. Both examinations were complementary, since visual correlation with the anatomic information on CT improved the reader's ability to discriminate between hilar vs subaortic MLN FDG uptake, and between paramediastinal tumor vs tracheobronchial MLN FDG uptake. If the results can be confirmed in larger numbers of patients, PET could reduce the need for invasive surgical staging remarkably.

Non-small cell lung cancer: an overview of current management

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) will remain a worldwide health problem for the foreseeable future. Unfortunately, local treatment of this disease is disappointing as most patients develop uncontrollable locally advanced or distant metastatic disease. The recent meta-analysis using updated patient data has suggested a potential role for adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy (CT) in early stage disease, and has shown a significant, albeit modest, improvement in survival when combined with radiotherapy in locally advanced disease and as a single modality in metastatic disease. Although quality and cost of extra life with this more aggressive treatment need to be defined in prospective studies, CT should be considered standard treatment for patients with locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC able to receive cisplatin-based CT. Its role in stage I and II disease is under current investigation. Ongoing clinical studies with more active agents, novel combined modality treatment strategies and laboratory discoveries continue to emerge which may lead to valuable new treatment options to extend this survival advantage.

Prognostic significance of tumoral angiogenesis in completely resected late stage lung carcinoma (stage IIIA-N2). Impact of adjuvant therapies in a subset of patients at high risk of recurrence

BACKGROUND

Angiogenesis plays a critical role in human tumor growth and metastasis. Microvessel count (MC), as a measure of tumor angiogenesis, has been significantly correlated with metastatic disease in cutaneous, mammary, prostatic, head and neck, and early stage lung carcinoma.

METHODS

Ninety-six consecutive patients affected by T1-3N2MO nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), who underwent radical surgery between March 1991 and March 1995 (in many cases followed by adjuvant therapies) were prospectively investigated to assess the prognostic significance of both traditional and new biologic parameters like proliferative activity, blood vessel invasion by tumoral cells, and neovascularization (estimated by the MC).

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 24 months, the projected 3-year survival was 42.1%. Forty-eight of the patients (50%) had already experienced a local (n=14) or systemic (n=34) relapse. The extent of resection (lobectomy vs. pneumonectomy; P=0.0045), the number of mediastinal lymph node levels (single vs. multiple; P=0.014), and the MC (on a X200 field; P=0.015) correlated significantly with metastatic disease. By univariate analysis, significant predictors of survival were: the extent of surgery (P=0.03), adjuvant therapy (P=0.05), and MC (< or = vs. > cut-off; P=0.00076). On multivariate analysis, however, only the MC (P=0.02) retained its level of prognostic significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results provide evidence that neovascularization, estimated by the MC, can predict metastatic disease and survival in patients with completely resected T1-3N2M0 NSCLC, and may also be useful in patient selection for effective adjuvant treatment.

Therapeutic options for regionally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

The optimal treatment for regionally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC, Stage IIIa/IIIb) remains unknown. Proposed approaches include surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and combinations of these. No treatment modality, however, has ever shown other than modest or minimal beneficial effects. When differences between new and old treatments appear trivial, as in the management of the locally advanced NSCLC, controlled studies are necessary to select the best approach. This review is based on a systematic overview of data from randomized trials comparing different treatment modalities. The following six points emerged from the cited literature. (1) It is sufficiently proved that chemotherapy alone prolongs survival in patients with both locally advanced and metastatic disease. (2) Although it is probably true that radiation therapy is better than no active treatment, this idea is supported by very limited evidence. (3) Although it is probably also true that radiotherapy alone is not worse than chemotherapy alone, this is another insufficiently proved issue. (4) The possible superiority of chemo-radiotherapy to chemotherapy alone or to supportive care is also poorly documented. (5) There is abundant evidence that chemo-radiotherapy is better than radiotherapy alone (however, this information may be unhelpful if point 2, or 3 remains unclarified). (6) Although neoadjuvant treatments have improved resectability and may ensure overall better results, the surgical cure, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy or chemo-radiotherapy, is another unproved option. Based on the above six points, it was concluded that new randomized studies are urgently needed to confirm the possible superiority of chemo-radiotherapy to chemotherapy. Only after such a validation, will the many ongoing trials, designed to prove the possible superiority of local surgical control to the more traditional approaches based on thoracic irradiation, have a practical sense.

Management of lung cancer in South East Scotland

BACKGROUND

There are few reports which describe the management of unselected groups of patients with lung cancer. This study was undertaken to audit prospectively the presentation, diagnosis, management, and outcome of patients presenting with lung cancer in South East Scotland.

METHODS

Data were recorded on all patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer who presented to a multidisciplinary group of clinicians over a 12 month period. Subsequent follow up data on treatment and survival were collected.

RESULTS

Six hundred and twenty two patients were registered, 80% of whom were referred from primary care. There was a considerable variation in the length of history, but the diagnosis was rapidly made after referral (87% within two weeks). In 82% of patients the pathological examination was positive; 70% were treated with palliative intent. Only 36% of patients who underwent surgery had computed tomographic scanning and 55% had sampling of mediastinal nodes. A wide variety of regimens was used for treatment with radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and follow up data were difficult to obtain in these patients. Survival was poor in all patients treated with palliative intent.

CONCLUSIONS

This audit confirms the importance of previously noted prognostic factors. Significant variation in referral practice, diagnostic and management evaluation has been shown. The data serve as a useful background for the formation of local management guidelines.

The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in NSCLC

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy to reduce tumor size before surgery or radiologic treatment is now a feasible option in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients in clinical stage IIIA N2 of the disease who were previously a poor prognostic subset when treated with surgery are now being treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by surgery or radiotherapy, in an attempt to improve survival rates. Published trials of neoadjuvant chemotherapy report response rates of 50 to 80% and median survival of 18-27 months. Two small trials have reported striking benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy over surgery alone. Other larger ongoing trials should answer some of the questions raised by these two trials.

Combination chemotherapy with vindesine-ifosfamide-cisplatin (VIP) in locally advanced unresectable stage III and in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II trial

The efficacy and toxicity of a regimen adding ifosfamide to the more classical cisplatin-vindesine combination was studied in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Sixty-four good performance patients with inoperable stage III or stage IV were treated with VIP: vindesine 3 mg/m2 days 1 and 8, ifosfamide 1200 mg/m2 and platinum 30 mg/m2 days 1, 2 and 3, repeated every 4 weeks, up to a maximum of six cycles. Response rate, clinical data and radiological tests were rigourously reviewed by a panel. Overall response rate was 39% (95% confidence interval, 27%-51%) with three patients achieving a complete response; response rate in stage III was 48%. Median survival was 9 months. Toxicity consisted mainly of bone marrow toxicity and nausea/vomiting, but was manageable. There was no renal toxicity greater than grade 2, four severe infections, but no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSION

VIP as mentioned above is very active in good performance patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Its activity, together with its manageable toxicity--without severe renal or pulmonary toxicity--makes it an attractive candidate for induction chemotherapy.

Combined modality treatment for stage III non-small cell lung cancer

There are increasing reports of studies in which combined modality treatment is being tested in stage III non-small cell lung cancer. Randomized trials in which sequential chemoradiotherapy has been compared to radiation alone and in which single agent cisplatin and simultaneous thoracic radiation were compared to radiation are reviewed and discussed. The largest and the most mature phase II trials of preoperative chemotherapy are also included in this review. Similarly the results from recently reported small randomized trials evaluating preoperative treatment are described. Potential future directions for clinical trials are suggested, including the incorporation of new agents in combined modality regimens.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was tested in non-small cell lung cancer in an attempt to increase the resectability of the tumor and to treat the microscopic metastatic disease known to be responsible for the majority of failures in surgically treated patients. This review deals with published trials. Most of them are feasibility studies in Stage III NSCLC. Obviously, the heterogeneity of eligibility criteria from one study to another prevents general conclusions on the usefulness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, it is possible to conclude that neoadjuvant chemotherapy has an antitumor activity; the majority of the studies report a 60% objective response rate including a significant number of complete responses and a 50% complete resection rate. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not increase morbidity after surgery except when it is combined with preoperative radiation therapy. At the time of writing, one Phase III randomized study comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery with surgery alone has been published. This study concludes that the combined modality treatment improves the survival of patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Taken as a whole, the literature deserves further studies to determine the place of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in lung cancer.

Long-term results of neoadjuvant ifosfamide, cisplatin, and etoposide combination in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Thirty-three patients with T3,N2,M0 or T4,N2,M0, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) took part in a phase 2 study in an attempt to evaluate the feasability of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and thoracic radiotherapy. Chemotherapy consisted of daily administration of the following treatment: etoposide, 100 mg/m2; cisplatin, 25 mg/m2; ifosfamide, 1.5 g/m2; and mesna, 1.8 g/m2 for 4 days. Three cycles were planned starting every 21 days. Responding patients underwent a thoracotomy in order to attempt a resection and then received a 45 Gy of thoracic radiotherapy. The results of response and resection rates have been published and the present final report deals with the long-term results. Chemotherapy induced a 55 percent partial response rate and a 15 percent complete response rate allowing a complete resection in 55 percent of the patients. Complete remission was histologically confirmed for the five complete responders. Although the median survival was short (10 months), six patients were long-term survivors (3-year survival rate: 19 percent). Survival was significantly influenced by the type of resection: patients for whom a complete resection was possible survived the longest with a median survival three times that of the other patients. Modalities of relapses differed according to the results of surgery: 8 of the 15 patients who did not undergo a complete surgical resection experienced a local relapse during the first 18 months of follow-up whereas in the complete resection group, central nervous system metastasis was the main site of relapse. We conclude that the neoadjuvants ifosfamide, cisplatin, and etoposide in patients with locally advanced NSCLC are feasible to use and allow a 19 percent 3-year survival rate. These results are the rationale of an ongoing randomized study comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and surgery alone. This study is designed to test whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves survival of patients with locally advanced NSCLC.