2',2'-Difluoro-deoxycytidine (gemcitabine) incorporation into RNA and DNA of tumour cell lines

Nucleo(s)tide metabolism as basis for drug development; the Anne Simmonds award lecture

Aberrant metabolism of purines and pyrimidines led to development of drugs for treatment of various diseases, such as inflammatory, neurological, cardiovascular, viral infections and cancer. Purine and Pyrimidine Symposia are characterized by close interactions, leading to extensive cross-fertilization on methodology and translating not only from bench-to-bedside, but also between various disciplines such as medicinal chemistry, pharmacology, oncology, virology, rheumatology, biochemistry, pediatrics, cardiology, surgery and immunology. This background was fundamental in our studies on how to optimize application of existing drugs (5-fluorouracil [5FU], thiopurines, antifolates such as methotrexate) but also to support development of novel drugs such as gemcitabine, novel antifolates, S-1, TAS-102 and fluorocyclopentenylcytosine. Knowledge of their metabolism helped to design rational combinations such as of gemcitabine with cisplatin, one of the most widely used drug combinations for various cancers. The combination of 5FU with uridine, led to the development of triacetyluridine registered for emergency treatment of patients with lethal 5FU toxicity. Mechanisms of action were studied by careful analysis of their metabolism, using classical enzyme assays with radioactive precursors and HPLC analysis. Drug metabolism moved from manually operated HPLC systems with UV-detection for peak identification and paper rolls for quantification, to computer-operated HPLC with automatic multi-wavelength and fluorometric peak detection and more recently to ultrasensitive, highly specific mass-spectrometry-based systems. Some aspects, however, never changed; careful analysis of the results and being prepared for the unexpected. The latter actually led to the most interesting results. Investigation of (nucleoside/nucleotide) metabolism remains an exciting field of research.

Cytosolic 5'-Nucleotidase III and Nucleoside Triphosphate Diphosphohydrolase 1 Dephosphorylate the Pharmacologically Active Metabolites of Gemcitabine and Emtricitabine

Gemcitabine (dFdC) and emtricitabine (FTC) are first-line drugs that are used for the treatment of pancreatic cancer and human immunodeficiency virus, respectively. The above drugs must undergo sequential phosphorylation to become pharmacologically active. Interindividual variability associated with the responses of the above drugs has been reported. The molecular mechanisms underlying the observed variability are yet to be elucidated. Although this could be multifactorial, nucleotidases may be involved in the dephosphorylation of drug metabolites due to their structural similarity to endogenous nucleosides. With these in mind, we performed in vitro assays using recombinant nucleotidases to assess their enzymatic activities toward the metabolites of dFdC and FTC. From the above in vitro experiments, we noticed the dephosphorylation of dFdC-monophosphate in the presence of two 5'-nucleotidases (5'-NTs), cytosolic 5'-nucleotidase IA (NT5C1A) and cytosolic 5'-nucleotidase III (NT5C3), individually. Interestingly, FTC monophosphate was dephosphorylated only in the presence of NT5C3 enzyme. Additionally, nucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 1 (NTPDase 1) exhibited enzymatic activity toward both triphosphate metabolites of dFdC and FTC. Enzyme kinetic analysis further revealed Michaelis-Menten kinetics for both NT5C3-mediated dephosphorylation of monophosphate metabolites, as well as NTPDase 1-mediated dephosphorylation of triphosphate metabolites. Immunoblotting results confirmed the presence of NT5C3 and NTPDase 1 in both pancreatic and colorectal tissue that are target sites for dFdC and FTC treatment, respectively. Furthermore, sex-specific expression patterns of NT5C3 and NTPDase 1 were determined using mass spectrometry-based proteomics approach. Based on the above results, NT5C3 and NTPDase 1 may function in the control of the levels of dFdC and FTC metabolites. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Emtricitabine and gemcitabine are commonly used drugs for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus and pancreatic cancer. To become pharmacologically active, both the above drugs must be phosphorylated. The variability in the responses of the above drugs can lead to poor clinical outcomes. Although the sources of drug metabolite concentration variability are multifactorial, it is vital to understand the role of nucleotidases in the tissue disposition of the above drug metabolites due to their structural similarities to endogenous nucleosides.

Stress granules dynamics and promising functions in pancreatic cancer

Stress granules (SGs), non-membrane subcellular organelles made up of non-translational messenger ribonucleoproteins (mRNPs), assemble in response to various environmental stimuli in cancer cells, including pancreatic cancer, particularly pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) which has a low 5-year survival rate of 10%. The pertinent research on SGs and pancreatic cancer has not, however, been compiled. In this review, we talk about the dynamics of SGs and their positive effects on pancreatic cancer such as SGs promote PDAC viability and repress apoptosis, meanwhile emphasizing the connection between SGs in pancreatic cancer and signature mutations such KRAS, P53, and SMAD4 as well as the functions of SGs in antitumor drug resistance. This novel stress management technique may open the door to better treatment options in the future.

Design, synthesis and antitumor activity study of a gemcitabine prodrug conjugated with a HDAC6 inhibitor

Gemcitabine, as a first-line antitumor drug, has attracted extensive attention. However the occurrence of drug resistance limits its clinical utilization. In this paper, a gemcitabine prodrug GZ was designed and synthesized by conjugation of gemcitabine with a newly reported HDAC6 selective inhibitor pentadecanoic acid. GZ displayed high cytotoxicity to nine cancer cell lines with IC₅₀ values in the low micromolar range. In vivo, GZ displayed superior antitumor activity to gemcitabine in a 4T1 tumor xenograft model without obvious pathological damage to important organs of mice. Our study showed that compound GZ is a potential gemcitabine prodrug, which is worthy of further antitumor activity exploration.

Metal complex-based liposomes: Applications and prospects in cancer diagnostics and therapeutics

Metal complexes are of increasing interest as pharmaceutical agents in cancer diagnostics and therapeutics, while some of them suffer from issues such as limited water solubility and severe systemic toxicity. These drawbacks severely hampered their efficacy and clinical applications. Liposomes hold promise as delivery vehicles for constructing metal complex-based liposomes to maximize the therapeutic efficacy and minimize the side effects of metal complexes. This review provides an overview on the latest advances of metal complex-based liposomal delivery systems. First, the development of metal complex-mediated liposomal encapsulation is briefly introduced. Next, applications of metal complex-based liposomes in a variety of fields are overviewed, where drug delivery, cancer imaging (single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), positron emission tomography (PET), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)), and cancer therapy (chemotherapy, phototherapy, and radiotherapy) were involved. Moreover, the potential toxicity, action of toxic mechanisms, immunological effects of metal complexes as well as the advantages of metal complex-liposomes in this content are also discussed. In the end, the future expectations and challenges of metal complex-based liposomes in clinical cancer therapy are tentatively proposed.

Targeting cancer via ribosome biogenesis: the cachexia perspective

Cancer cachexia afflicts many advanced cancer patients with many progressing to death. While there have been many advancements in understanding the molecular mechanisms that contribute to the development of cancer cachexia, substantial gaps still exist. Chemotherapy drugs often target ribosome biogenesis to slow or blunt tumor cell growth and proliferation. Some of the most frequent side-effects of chemotherapy are loss of skeletal muscle mass, muscular strength and an increase in fatigue. Given that ribosome biogenesis has emerged as a main mechanism regulating muscle hypertrophy, and more recently, also implicated in muscle atrophy, we propose that some chemotherapy drugs can cause further muscle wasting via its effect on skeletal muscle cells. Many chemotherapy drugs, including the most prescribed drugs such as doxorubicin and cisplatin, affect ribosomal DNA transcription, or other pathways related to ribosome biogenesis. Furthermore, middle-aged and older individuals are the most affected population with cancer, and advanced cancer patients often show reduced levels of physical inactivity. Thus, aging and inactivity can themselves affect muscle ribosome biogenesis, which can further worsen the effect of chemotherapy on skeletal muscle ribosome biogenesis and, ultimately, muscle mass and function. We propose that chemotherapy can accelerate the onset or worsen cancer cachexia via its inhibitory effects on skeletal muscle ribosome biogenesis. We end our review by providing recommendations that could be used to ameliorate the negative effects of chemotherapy on skeletal muscle ribosome biogenesis.

Repurposing FDA approved drugs as radiosensitizers for treating hypoxic prostate cancer

Background

The presence of hypoxia is a poor prognostic factor in prostate cancer and the hypoxic tumor microenvironment promotes radioresistance. There is potential for drug radiotherapy combinations to improve the therapeutic ratio. We aimed to investigate whether hypoxia-associated genes could be used to identify FDA approved drugs for repurposing for the treatment of hypoxic prostate cancer.

Methods

Hypoxia associated genes were identified and used in the connectivity mapping software QUADrATIC to identify FDA approved drugs as candidates for repurposing. Drugs identified were tested in vitro in prostate cancer cell lines (DU145, PC3, LNCAP). Cytotoxicity was investigated using the sulforhodamine B assay and radiosensitization using a clonogenic assay in normoxia and hypoxia.

Results

Menadione and gemcitabine had similar cytotoxicity in normoxia and hypoxia in all three cell lines. In DU145 cells, the radiation sensitizer enhancement ratio (SER) of menadione was 1.02 in normoxia and 1.15 in hypoxia. The SER of gemcitabine was 1.27 in normoxia and 1.09 in hypoxia. No radiosensitization was seen in PC3 cells.

Conclusion

Connectivity mapping can identify FDA approved drugs for potential repurposing that are linked to a radiobiologically relevant phenotype. Gemcitabine and menadione could be further investigated as potential radiosensitizers in prostate cancer.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12894-021-00856-x.

Drug repurposing approach to combating coronavirus: Potential drugs and drug targets

In the past two decades, three highly pathogenic human coronaviruses severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV), Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus, and, recently, SARS-CoV-2, have caused pandemics of severe acute respiratory diseases with alarming morbidity and mortality. Due to the lack of specific anti-CoV therapies, the ongoing pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) poses a great challenge to clinical management and highlights an urgent need for effective interventions. Drug repurposing is a rapid and feasible strategy to identify effective drugs for combating this deadly infection. In this review, we summarize the therapeutic CoV targets, focus on the existing small molecule drugs that have the potential to be repurposed for existing and emerging CoV infections of the future, and discuss the clinical progress of developing small molecule drugs for COVID-19.

Sulfasalazine modifies metabolic profiles and enhances cisplatin chemosensitivity on cholangiocarcinoma cells in in vitro and in vivo models

Background

Sulfasalazine (SSZ) is widely known as an xCT inhibitor suppressing CD44v9-expressed cancer stem-like cells (CSCs) being related to redox regulation. Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) has a high recurrence rate and no effective chemotherapy. A recent report revealed high levels of CD44v9-positive cells in CCA patients. Therefore, a combination of drugs could prove a suitable strategy for CCA treatment via individual metabolic profiling.

Methods

We examined the effect of xCT-targeted CD44v9-CSCs using sulfasalazine combined with cisplatin (CIS) or gemcitabine in CCA in vitro and in vivo models and did NMR-based metabolomics analysis of xenograft mice tumor tissues.

Results

Our findings suggest that combined SSZ and CIS leads to a higher inhibition of cell proliferation and induction of cell death than CIS alone in both in vitro and in vivo models. Xenograft mice showed that the CD44v9-CSC marker and CK-19-CCA proliferative marker were reduced in the combination treatment. Interestingly, different metabolic signatures and significant metabolites were observed in the drug-treated group compared with the control group that revealed the cancer suppression mechanisms.

Conclusions

SSZ could improve CCA therapy by sensitization to CIS through killing CD44v9-positive cells and modifying the metabolic pathways, in particular tryptophan degradation (i.e., kynurenine pathway, serotonin pathway) and nucleic acid metabolism.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40170-021-00249-6.

Design, synthesis, and evaluation of liver-specific gemcitabine prodrugs for potential treatment of hepatitis C virus infection and hepatocellular carcinoma

Many successful anti-viral and anti-cancer drugs are nucleoside analogs, which disrupt RNA and/or DNA synthesis. Here, we present liver-specific prodrugs of the chemotherapy drug gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine) for the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and hepatocellular carcinoma. The prodrugs were synthesized by introducing aromatic functional moieties to the cytosine 4-NH₂ group of gemcitabine via amide bonds. The chemical modification was designed to i) enable passive diffusion across cellular membrane, ii) protect the prodrugs from inactivating deamination by cellular enzymes, and iii) allow release of active gemcitabine after amide hydrolysis by high levels of carboxylesterases in the liver. We found that many of our prodrugs exhibited similar toxicity as gemcitabine toward liver- and kidney-derived cancer cell lines but were 24- to 620-fold less cytotoxic than gemcitabine in breast- and pancreas-derived cancer cells, respectively. The prodrugs also inhibited an HCV replicon with IC₅₀ values ranging from 10 nM-1.7 μM. Moreover, many of the prodrugs had therapeutic index values of >10,000 and have synergetic effects when combined with other Food and Drug Administration-approved anti-HCV small molecule drugs. These characteristics support the development of gemcitabine prodrugs as liver-specific therapeutics.

Small Molecular Gemcitabine Prodrugs for Cancer Therapy

Gemcitabine as a pyrimidine nucleoside analog anticancer drug has high efficacy for a broad spectrum of solid tumors. Gemcitabine is activated within tumor cells by sequential phosphorylation carried out by deoxycytidine kinase to mono-, di-, and triphosphate nucleotides with the last one as the active form. But the instability, drug resistance and toxicity severely limited its utilization in clinics. In the field of medicinal chemistry, prodrugs have proven to be a very effective means for elevating drug stability and decrease undesirable side effects including the nucleoside anticancer drug such as gemcitabine. Many works have been accomplished in design and synthesis of gemcitabine prodrugs, majority of which were summarized in this review.

New Mechanism of Gemcitabine and Its Phosphates: DNA Polymerization Disruption via 3'-5' Exonuclease Inhibition

Gemcitabine (dFdC), a modified deoxycytidine (dC) widely used in tumor treatment, is a prodrug that is phosphorylated to generate mono-, di-, and triphosphates. The triphosphate (dFdCTP) is incorporated into DNA to terminate DNA synthesis in cancer. Some incorporated dFdC nucleotides can be partially removed by the 3'-5' exonuclease activity, namely its editing function, and the others escape the editing. However, whether there is an active mechanism for dFdC to escape the editing remains unclear. We have first discovered that unlike dFdC, its mono-, di-, and triphosphates can inhibit the 3'-5' exonuclease of DNA polymerase I, suppress editing, and allow the active escaping mechanism, whereas its polymerase activity is not remarkably affected. As such, these phosphates can prevent the removal of the incorporated dFdC residue, thereby actively blocking DNA extension and synthesis. The inhibition efficiency of these phosphates follows the increased order of the mono-, di-, and triphosphates of gemcitabine (dFdC < dFdCMP < dFdCDP < dFdCTP). In addition, after the deletion of the 3'-5' exonuclease of cellular DNA polymerase I, the Escherichia coli mutant is more sensitive to dFdCTP than is wild-type E. coli. Our new discovery of the ability of these dFdC phosphates to inhibit exonuclease activity suggests a novel anticancer mechanism of gemcitabine and its phosphate derivatives.

Radioresistance in Glioblastoma and the Development of Radiosensitizers

Ionizing radiation is a common and effective therapeutic option for the treatment of glioblastoma (GBM). Unfortunately, some GBMs are relatively radioresistant and patients have worse outcomes after radiation treatment. The mechanisms underlying intrinsic radioresistance in GBM has been rigorously investigated over the past several years, but the complex interaction of the cellular molecules and signaling pathways involved in radioresistance remains incompletely defined. A clinically effective radiosensitizer that overcomes radioresistance has yet to be identified. In this review, we discuss the current status of radiation treatment in GBM, including advances in imaging techniques that have facilitated more accurate diagnosis, and the identified mechanisms of GBM radioresistance. In addition, we provide a summary of the candidate GBM radiosensitizers being investigated, including an update of subjects enrolled in clinical trials. Overall, this review highlights the importance of understanding the mechanisms of GBM radioresistance to facilitate the development of effective radiosensitizers.

Human equilibrative nucleoside transporter-1 (hENT1) and ribonucleotide reductase regulatory subunit M1 (RRM1) expression; do they have survival impact to pancreatic cancer?

Backgrounds/Aims

Gemcitabine is still one of adjuvant options in chemotherapeutic agent for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Integral membrane transporter protein and intracellular enzymes including human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (hENT1), deoxycytidine kinase (dCK), ribonucleotide reductase (RR) M1, and M2 are known as important factors for chemosensitivity of gemcitabine. We aimed to investigate the correlation between these key molecules and 5-year actual survival in PDAC patients.

Methods

The expression of intratumoral hENT1, dCK, RRM1, and RRM2 was assessed immunohistochemically in 160 PDAC patients underwent surgical resection. Association between clininopathologic factors, immunohistochemical results, and overall survival were analyzed.

Results

Adjuvant chemotherapy including concurrent chemoradiotherapy was not associated with overall survival (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.65-1.31; p=0.658). High hENT1 expression group did not show statistical survival difference, compared with all others (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.82-1.65, p=0.396). Gemcitabine therapy and high hENT1 group was compared with all other patients, and no difference in overall survival was identified (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.68-1.42; p=0.940). And, gemcitabine therapy and high hENT1 group did not differ statistically from gemcitabine therapy and low hENT1 expression (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.55-1.56; p=0.764). The intensity of dCK, RRM1, and RRM2 expression was not associated with overall survival (p=0.413, p=0.138 and p=0.061) in univariate analysis.

Conclusions

The expression of hENT1, dCK, RRM1 and RRM2 may not be associated with overall survival for patients with pancreatic cancer on gemcitabine adjuvant therapy. These proteins and other factors that may interact with or confound these results should be investigated in the near future.

Drug repurposing of pyrimidine analogs as potent antiviral compounds against human enterovirus A71 infection with potential clinical applications

Enterovirus A71 (EV-A71) is one of the aetiological agents for the hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD) in young children and a potential cause of neurological complications in afflicted patients. Since its discovery in 1969, there remains no approved antiviral for EV-A71 and other HFMD-causing enteroviruses. We set out to address the lack of therapeutics against EV-A71 by screening an FDA-approved drug library and found an enrichment of hits including pyrimidine antimetabolite, gemcitabine which showed 90.2% of inhibition on EV-A71 infection. Gemcitabine and other nucleoside analogs, LY2334737 and sofosbuvir inhibition of EV-A71 infection were disclosed using molecular and proteomic quantification, and in vitro and in vivo efficacy evaluation. Gemcitabine displayed a significant reduction of infectious EV-A71 titres by 2.5 logs PFU/mL and was shown to target the early stage of EV-A71 viral RNA and viral protein synthesis process especially via inhibition of the RNA dependent RNA polymerase. In addition, the drug combination study of gemcitabine's synergistic effects with interferon-β at 1:1 and 1:2 ratio enhanced inhibition against EV-A71 replication. Since gemcitabine is known to metabolize rapidly in vivo, other nucleoside analogs, LY2334737 and sofosbuvir conferred protection in mice against lethal EV-A71 challenge by potentially reducing the death rate, viral titers as well on virus-induced pathology in the limb muscle tissue of mice. Additionally, we found that gemcitabine is competent to inhibit other positive-sense RNA viruses of the Flaviviridae and Togaviridae family. Overall, these drugs provide new insights into targeting viral factors as a broad-spectrum antiviral strategy with potential therapeutic value for future development and are worthy of potential clinical application.

Arginine Starvation and Docetaxel Induce c-Myc-Driven hENT1 Surface Expression to Overcome Gemcitabine Resistance in ASS1-Negative Tumors

PURPOSE

The response to acute and long-term arginine starvation results in a conditional adaptive metabolic reprogramming that can be harnessed for therapeutic opportunities in ASS1-negative tumors. Here, we investigate the underlying biology of priming ASS1- tumors with arginine deiminase (ADI-PEG20) before treatment with gemcitabine (GEM) and docetaxel (DTX) in sarcoma, pancreatic cancer, and melanoma cell lines.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

ASS1- tumor cell lines were treated to create LTAT (long-term ADI treated) cell lines (ASS1+) and used for drug combination studies. Protein expression of ASS1, dCK, RRM2, E2F1, c-MYC, and hENT1 was measured. c-MYC activity was determined, live-cell immunofluorescent studies for hENT1, uptake assays of FITC-cytosine probe, and rescue studies with a c-MYC inhibitor were all determined in the presence or absence of the ADI-PEG20:GEM:DTX.

RESULTS

In examining modulations within the pyrimidine pathway, we identified that the addition of DTX to cells treated with ADI-PEG20 resulted in translocation of stabilized c-Myc to the nucleus. This resulted in an increase of hENT1 cell-surface expression and rendered the cells susceptible to GEM. In vivo studies demonstrate that the combination of ADI-PEG20:GEM:DTX was optimal for tumor growth inhibition, providing the preclinical mechanism and justification for the ongoing clinical trial of ADI-PEG20, GEM, and DTX in sarcoma.

CONCLUSIONS

The priming of tumors with ADI-PEG20 and DTX results in the stabilization of c-MYC potentiating the effect of GEM treatment via an increase in hENT1 expression. This finding is applicable to ASS1-deficient cancers that are currently treated with GEM.

Nucleoside Analogues as Antibacterial Agents

The rapid increase in antibiotic-resistant bacteria has emphasized the urgent need to identify new treatments for bacterial infections. One attractive approach, reducing the need for expensive and time-consuming clinical trials, is to repurpose existing clinically approved compounds for use as antibacterial agents. Nucleoside analogues are commonly used for treating viral and fungal infections, as well as for treating cancers, but have received relatively little attention as treatments for bacterial infections. However, a significant number of clinically approved derivatives of both pyrimidines and purines including halogenated, thiolated, and azolated compounds have been shown to have antibacterial activity. In the small number of studies carried out to date, such compounds have shown promise in treating bacterial infections. Here, we review the mechanisms of action and antibacterial activities of nucleoside analogues that can potentially be repurposed for treating infections as well as considering possible limitations in their usage.

Discovering novel SNPs that are correlated with patient outcome in a Singaporean cancer patient cohort treated with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy

Background

Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) can influence patient outcome such as drug response and toxicity after drug intervention. The purpose of this study is to develop a systematic pathway approach to accurately and efficiently predict novel non-synonymous SNPs (nsSNPs) that could be causative to gemcitabine-based chemotherapy treatment outcome in Singaporean non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

Methods

Using a pathway approach that incorporates comprehensive protein-protein interaction data to systematically extend the gemcitabine pharmacologic pathway, we identified 77 related nsSNPs, common in the Singaporean population. After that, we used five computational criteria to prioritize the SNPs based on their importance for protein function. We specifically selected and screened six candidate SNPs in a patient cohort with NSCLC treated with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy.

Result

We performed survival analysis followed by hematologic toxicity analyses and found that three of six candidate SNPs are significantly correlated with the patient outcome (P < 0.05) i.e. ABCG2 Q141K (rs2231142), SLC29A3 S158F (rs780668) and POLR2A N764K (rs2228130).

Conclusions

Our computational SNP candidate enrichment workflow approach was able to identify several high confidence biomarkers predictive for personalized drug treatment outcome while providing a rationale for a molecular mechanism of the SNP effect.

Trial registration

NCT00695994. Registered 10 June, 2008 ‘retrospectively registered’.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4471-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Pharmacological factors affecting accumulation of gemcitabine's active metabolite, gemcitabine triphosphate

Gemcitabine is an anticancer agent acting against several solid tumors. It requires nucleoside transporters for cellular uptake and deoxycytidine kinase for activation into active gemcitabine-triphosphate, which is incorporated into the DNA and RNA. However, it can also be deaminated in the plasma. The intracellular level of gemcitabine-triphosphate is affected by scheduling or by combination with other chemotherapeutic regimens. Moreover, higher concentrations of gemcitabine-triphosphate may affect the toxicity, and possibly the clinical efficacy. As a consequence, different nucleoside analogs have been synthetized with the aim to increase the concentration of gemcitabine-triphosphate into cells. In this review, we summarize currently published evidence on pharmacological factors affecting the intracellular level of gemcitabine-triphosphate to guide future trials on the use of new nucleoside analogs.

Pharmacological principles of intraperitoneal and bidirectional chemotherapy

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy is associated with a significant pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic benefit and can, alone or in combination with systemic chemotherapy (bidirectional chemotherapy), be used for treating primary and secondary peritoneal surface malignancies. Due to the peritoneal-plasma barrier, high intraperitoneal drug concentration can be achieved by intraperitoneal chemotherapy, whereas systemic concentration remains low. Bidirectional chemotherapy may provide in addition adequate drug concentrations from the side of the subperitoneal space to the peritoneal tumour nodules. Major pharmacological problems of intraperitoneal chemotherapy are limited tissue penetration and poor homogeneity of drug distribution to the entire seroperitoneal surface. Significant pharmacological determinants of intraperitoneal chemotherapy are choice of drug, drug dosage, solution volume, carrier solution, intra-abdominal pressure, temperature, duration, mode of administration, extent of peritonectomy and interindividual variability. Drugs most commonly applied for intraperitoneal chemotherapy include mitomycin C, cisplatin, carboplatin, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, 5-fluoruracil, gemcitabine, paclitaxel, docetaxel, doxorubicin, premetrexed and melphalan. The drugs and their doses that are used vary widely among centres. While the adequate drug choice for intraperitoneal and bidirectional chemotherapy is essential, randomized clinical trials to determine the most optimal drug or drug combination are lacking, and only eight retrospective comparative clinical studies are available. Further clinical pharmacological studies are required to determine the most effective drug regimen for intraperitoneal and bidirectional chemotherapy in various indications. In the future, reliable drug sensitivity testing and genetic profiling of peritoneal metastases will be needed for enabling patient-specific therapy.

Sensitive liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS) assay reveals novel insights on DNA methylation and incorporation of gemcitabine, its metabolite difluorodeoxyuridine, deoxyuridine, and RX-3117 into DNA

Antimetabolites are incorporated into DNA and RNA, affecting their function. Liquid-chromatography-mass-spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) permits the sensitive, selective analysis of normal nucleosides. The method was adapted to measure the incorporation of deoxyuridine, gemcitabine (difluorodeoxycytidine), its metabolite difluorodeoxyuridine (dFdU), and the novel compound fluorocyclopentenylcytosine (RX3117). DNA was degraded to its deoxynucleotides for quantification by LC-MS-MS, gradient chromatography on a Phenomenex prodigy-3-ODS with positive ionization. The range of deoxyuridine DNA-mis-incorporation varied nine-fold in 27 cell lines (leukemia, colon, ovarian, lung cancer). At low-folate conditions a 2.1-fold increase in deoxyuridine was observed. Global methylation (given as % 5-methyl-deoxycytidine) was comparable between the cell lines (4.6-6.5%). Exposure of A2780 cells to 1 μM gemcitabine (4 hours) resulted in 3.6 pmol gemcitabine/μg DNA, but in AG6000 cells (deoxycytidine-kinase-deficient) no incorporation was found. However, when A2780, AG6000, or CCRF-CEM cells were exposed to 100 μM dFdU we found it as gemcitabine, 20.5, 19.6, and 0.51 pmol gemcitabine/μg DNA, respectively. Preincubation of CCRF-CEM cells with cyclopentenyl-cytosine (a CTP-synthetase inhibitor) increased dFdU incorporation four-fold. Apparently dFdU is activated independently of deoxycytidine-kinase and possibly converted in-situ to dFdCMP. RX3117 was incorporated into both DNA and RNA (0.0037 and 0.00515 pmol/μg, respectively). In summary, a sensitive method to quantify the incorporation of gemcitabine, deoxyuridine, and RX-3117 was developed, which revealed that dFdU was incorporated into DNA as the parent compound gemcitabine.

Nab-paclitaxel plus either gemcitabine or simplified leucovorin and fluorouracil as first-line therapy for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (AFUGEM GERCOR): a non-comparative, multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine has become a standard treatment regimen in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma; however, retrospective data suggest that gemcitabine might be inefficient in 50-60% of patients and thus not an optimum regimen in combination with nab-paclitaxel. We did a phase 2 trial to assess the activity and safety of a new regimen of nab-paclitaxel plus simplified leucovorin and fluorouracil.

METHODS

We did a non-comparative, multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 2 trial in 15 hospitals and institutions in France. Eligible participants were previously untreated patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (previous adjuvant chemotherapy after curative intent resection was allowed if the interval between the end of chemotherapy and relapse was more than 12 months). Patients had to have at least one measurable lesion assessed by CT scan or MRI and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2 or less. We randomly assigned participants (1:2) centrally to 28-day cycles of either gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel or simplified leucovorin and fluorouracil plus nab-paclitaxel. The randomisation was by minimisation, stratified by centre and ECOG performance status. Drugs were administered in each cycle as follows: nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m²) and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m²) as 30-min intravenous infusions on days 1, 8, and 15; leucovorin (400 mg/m²) as a 120-min intravenous infusion on days 1 and 15; and fluorouracil (400 mg/m²) as a 5-min bolus intravenous infusion followed by a 46-h continuous intravenous infusion of 2400 mg/m² on days 1 and 15. Patients continued treatment until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, or patient withdrawal. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 4 months in the first 72 assessable patients in the leucovorin and fluorouracil group, with a target of 50% for the regimen to be deemed sufficiently active to warrant further study. We did the primary analysis on the modified intention-to-treat (ITT) population, defined as all randomly assigned and assessable patients regardless of their eligibility and received treatments. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01964534. The trial has ended and we report the final analysis here.

FINDINGS

Between Dec 12, 2013, and Oct 31, 2014, we randomly assigned 114 patients to treatment: 75 patients to the leucovorin and fluorouracil group and 39 to the gemcitabine group. One patient in the leucovorin and fluorouracil group did not have a 4-month assessment, and was thus excluded from the modified ITT analysis. Median follow-up was 13·1 months (95% CI 12·5-14·1). At 4 months, 40 (56%, 90% CI 45-66) of 72 patients in the leucovorin and fluorouracil group were alive and free from disease progression (21 [54%, 40-68] of 39 patients in the gemcitabine group were also alive and progression-free at 4 months). Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 33 (87%) of 38 patients in the gemcitabine group and in 56 (77%) of 73 patients in the leucovorin and fluorouracil group, with different toxicity profiles. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events in the leucovorin and fluorouracil group were neutropenia without fever (17 [23%]), fatigue (16 [22%]), paraesthesia (14 [19%]), diarrhoea (nine [12%]), and mucositis (seven [10%]); in the gemcitabine group they were neutropenia without fever (12 [32%]), thrombocytopenia (seven [18%]), fatigue (eight [21%]), anaemia (five [13%]), increased alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase concentrations (five [13%] for both), and paraesthesia (four [11%]). Two participants died; one in the leucovorin and fluorouracil group from septic shock, and one in the gemcitabine group from diabetes compensation with acidosis; these deaths were deemed to be not related to treatment. Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 28 (38%) of 73 patients in the leucovorin and fluorouracil group and in 14 (37%) of 38 in the gemcitabine group.

INTERPRETATION

Nab-paclitaxel plus simplified leucovorin and fluorouracil fulfilled the primary endpoint in that more than the required 50% of our study population were progression-free at 4 months, with a tolerable toxicity profile. This regimen thus deserves further assessment in a phase 3 trial.

FUNDING

GERCOR (Groupe Coopérateur Multidisciplinaire en Oncologie) and Celgene through grants to GERCOR.

Aptamer-Drug Conjugates of Active Metabolites of Nucleoside Analogs and Cytotoxic Agents Inhibit Pancreatic Tumor Cell Growth

Aptamer-drug conjugates (ApDCs) have the potential to improve the therapeutic index of traditional chemotherapeutic agents due to their ability to deliver cytotoxic drugs specifically to cancer cells while sparing normal cells. This study reports on the conjugation of cytotoxic drugs to an aptamer previously described by our group, the pancreatic cancer RNA aptamer P19. To this end, P19 was incorporated with gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), or conjugated to monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) and derivative of maytansine 1 (DM1). The ApDCs P19-dFdCMP and P19-5FdUMP were shown to induce the phosphorylation of histone H2AX on Ser139 (γ-H2AX) and significantly inhibited cell proliferation by 51%–53% in PANC-1 and by 54%–34% in the gemcitabine-resistant pancreatic cancer cell line AsPC-1 (p ≤ 0.0001). P19-MMAE and P19-DM1 caused mitotic G2/M phase arrest and inhibited cell proliferation by up to 56% in a dose-dependent manner when compared to the control group (p ≤ 0.001). In addition, the cytotoxicity of P19-MMAE and P19-DM1 in normal cells and the control human breast cancer cell line MCF7 was minimal. These results suggest that this approach may be useful in decreasing cytotoxic side effects in non-tumoral tissue.

Metabolism, Biochemical Actions, and Chemical Synthesis of Anticancer Nucleosides, Nucleotides, and Base Analogs

Nucleoside, nucleotide, and base analogs have been in the clinic for decades to treat both viral pathogens and neoplasms. More than 20% of patients on anticancer chemotherapy have been treated with one or more of these analogs. This review focuses on the chemical synthesis and biology of anticancer nucleoside, nucleotide, and base analogs that are FDA-approved and in clinical development since 2000. We highlight the cellular biology and clinical biology of analogs, drug resistance mechanisms, and compound specificity towards different cancer types. Furthermore, we explore analog syntheses as well as improved and scale-up syntheses. We conclude with a discussion on what might lie ahead for medicinal chemists, biologists, and physicians as they try to improve analog efficacy through prodrug strategies and drug combinations.

Exploring the Potent Inhibition of CTP Synthase by Gemcitabine-5'-Triphosphate

CTP synthase (CTPS) catalyzes the conversion of UTP to CTP and is a target for the development of antiviral, anticancer, antiprotozoal, and immunosuppressive agents. Exposure of cell lines to the antineoplastic cytidine analogue gemcitabine causes depletion of intracellular CTP levels, but the direct inhibition of CTPS by its metabolite gemcitabine-5'-triphosphate (dF-dCTP) has not been demonstrated. We show that dF-dCTP is a potent competitive inhibitor of Escherichia coli CTPS with respect to UTP [K_i =(3.0±0.1) μm], and that its binding affinity exceeds that of CTP ≈75-fold. Site-directed mutagenesis studies indicated that Glu149 is an important binding determinant for both CTP and dF-dCTP. Comparison of the binding affinities of the 5'-triphosphates of 2'-fluoro-2'-deoxycytidine and 2'-fluoro-2'-deoxyarabinocytidine revealed that the 2'-F-arabino group contributes markedly to the strong binding of dF-dCTP. Geminal 2'-F substitution on UTP (dF-dUTP) did not result in an increase in binding affinity with CTPS. Remarkably, CTPS catalyzed the conversion of dF-dUTP into dF-dCTP, thus suggesting that dF-dCTP might be regenerated in vivo from its catabolite dF-dUTP.

Profiling ribonucleotide and deoxyribonucleotide pools perturbed by gemcitabine in human non-small cell lung cancer cells

In this study, we investigated the dosage effect of gemcitabine, an inhibitor of ribonucleotide reductase (RR), on cellular levels of ribonucleotides and deoxyribonucleotides using high performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometric method. As anticipated, after 4-h incubation of non-small cell lung cancer (A549) cells with gemcitabine at 0.5 and 2 μM, there were consistent reductions in levels of deoxyribonucleoside diphosphates (dNDP) and their corresponding deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates (dNTP). However, after 24-h exposure to 0.5 μM gemcitabine, the amounts of dNTP were increased by about 3 fold, whereas cells after 24-h 2 μM gemcitabine treatment exhibited deoxycytidine diphosphate (dCDP), deoxyadenosine diphosphate (dADP) and deoxyguanosine diphosphate (dGDP) levels less than 50% of control values, with deoxycytidine triphosphate (dCTP) and deoxyguanosine triphosphate (dGTP) returning to the control level. Using cell cycle analysis, we found that 24-h incubation at 0.5 μM gemcitabine resulted in a significant increase in S phase arrest, while 2 μM treatment increased G0/G1 population. Our data demonstrated the correlation between the level of RR and the increased levels of dNTPs in the group of 0.5 μM treatment for 24-h with a markedly reduced level of dFdCTP. Accordingly, we proposed that the dosage of dFdC could determine the arrested phase of cell cycle, in turn affecting the recovery of dNTPs pools.

Diagnostic Microdosing Approach to Study Gemcitabine Resistance

Gemcitabine metabolites cause the termination of DNA replication and induction of apoptosis. We determined whether subtherapeutic "microdoses" of gemcitabine are incorporated into DNA at levels that correlate to drug cytotoxicity. A pair of nearly isogenic bladder cancer cell lines differing in resistance to several chemotherapy drugs were treated with various concentrations of ¹⁴C-labeled gemcitabine for 4-24 h. Drug incorporation into DNA was determined by accelerator mass spectrometry. A mechanistic analysis determined that RRM2, a DNA synthesis protein and a known resistance factor, substantially mediated gemcitabine toxicity. These results support gemcitabine levels in DNA as a potential biomarker of drug cytotoxicity.

Circadian Physiology Is a Toxicity Target of the Anticancer Drug Gemcitabine in Mice

The circadian timing system determines the optimal timing and waveform of drug tolerability, yet treatment itself can alter this system. Gemcitabine is an antimetabolite agent that is active against lung and pancreatic cancers. Tolerability for this drug is best following dosing at ZT 11 in mice. The authors investigated the effects of gemcitabine on the circadian rhythms in body temperature and rest activity as physiological markers of the circadian timing system. Healthy unrestrained B6D2F1 mice implanted with radiotelemetry transmitters were kept in LD 12:12 prior to receiving a single intravenous dose of gemcitabine (200, 400, or 600 mg/kg) at ZT 11 or 23. Gemcitabine (400 mg/kg) transiently suppressed the body temperature rhythm in 50% of the mice dosed at ZT 23, as compared to none of the mice treated at ZT 11 within the 2 days following drug dosing (Fisher 's exact test p = 0.04). The rest-activity circadian rhythm was suppressed in 40% (ZT 11) and 50% (ZT 23) of the mice, respectively. In the mice with persistent circadian rhythms, gemcitabine delivery at ZT 23 resulted in more prominent decreases and slower recovery of circadian mesor and amplitude of both rhythms as compared to mice treated at ZT 11. Gemcitabine also induced a transient internal desynchronization between temperature and activity rhythms following dosing at ZT 23 but not at ZT 11. The delivery of a single therapeutic dose of gemcitabine near its time of least toxicity produced least alterations in circadian physiological outputs, a finding that suggests that the extent of circadian disruption contributes to toxicokinetic processes.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of Gemcitabine as a mainstay in adult and pediatric oncology: an EORTC-PAMM perspective

Gemcitabine is an antimetabolite ranking among the most prescribed anticancer drugs worldwide. This nucleoside analog exerts its antiproliferative action after tumoral conversion into active triphosphorylated nucleotides interfering with DNA synthesis and targeting ribonucleotide reductase. Gemcitabine is a mainstay for treating pancreatic and lung cancers, alone or in combination with several cytotoxic drugs (nab-paclitaxel, cisplatin and oxaliplatin), and is an option in a variety of other solid or hematological cancers. Several determinants of response have been identified with gemcitabine, i.e., membrane transporters, activating and inactivating enzymes at the tumor level, or Hedgehog signaling pathway. More recent studies have investigated how germinal genetic polymorphisms affecting cytidine deaminase, the enzyme responsible for the liver disposition of gemcitabine, could act as well as a marker for clinical outcome (i.e., toxicity, efficacy) at the bedside. Besides, constant efforts have been made to develop alternative chemical derivatives or encapsulated forms of gemcitabine, as an attempt to improve its metabolism and pharmacokinetics profile. Overall, gemcitabine is a drug paradigmatic for constant searches of the scientific community to improve its administration through the development of personalized medicine in oncology.

Pancreatic cancer therapy using an injectable nanobiohybrid hydrogel

Nanobiohybrid hydrogels, composed of biocompatible inorganic nanoparticles and biodegradable polymeric hydrogels, have been developed as the sustained delivery carrier of gemcitabine for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Gemcitabine-Based Chemoradiation in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer: Systematic Review of Literature and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Platinum-based concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) improves locoregional control and overall survival of locoregionally advanced (LA) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) when compared to radiotherapy alone, but this approach is hampered by significant toxicity. Therefore, alternative ways to enhance the radiation effects are worth investigating. Gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine), in addition to its activity against a variety of solid tumors, including SCCHN, is one of the most potent radiosensitizers, and it has an overall favorable safety profile. In this paper, the clinical experience with gemcitabine-based chemoradiation in the treatment of patients with LA-SCCHN is reviewed.

METHODS

We conducted a review of the literature on the clinical experience with radiotherapy combined with either single-agent gemcitabine or gemcitabine/cisplatin-based polychemotherapy for the treatment of patients with LA-SCCHN. We also searched abstracts in databases of major international oncology meetings from the last 20 years. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate pooled proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for complete response rate and grade 3-4 acute mucositis rate.

RESULTS

A total of 13 papers were eligible for the literature review. For schedules using a gemcitabine dose intensity (DI) below 50 mg/m(2) per week, the complete response rate was 86% (95% CI, 74%-93%) with grade 3-4 acute mucositis rate of 38% (95% CI, 27%-50%) and acceptable late toxicity. In one of the studies employing such low DIs, survival data were provided showing a 3-year overall survival of 50%. Compared with DI ≥50 mg/m(2) per week, there was no difference in the complete response rate (71%; 95% CI, 55%-83%; p = .087) but a significantly higher (p < .001) grade 3-4 acute mucositis rate of 74% (95% CI, 62%-83%), often leading to treatment interruptions (survival data provided in 8 studies; 3-year overall survival, 27%-63%). Late toxicity comprising mainly dysphagia was generally underreported, whereas information about xerostomia and skin fibrosis was scarce.

CONCLUSION

This review highlights the radiosensitizing potential of gemcitabine and suggests that even very low dosages (less than 50 mg/m(2) per week) provide a sufficient therapeutic ratio and therefore should be further investigated. Refinements in radiation schemes, including intensity-modulated radiation therapy, in combination with low-dose gemcitabine and targeted agents, such as cetuximab, are currently being investigated.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) has become the standard treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC). This approach is hampered by significant toxicity. This paper reviews the studies using gemcitabine as an alternative radio-sensitizer for CCRT in patients with LAHNC. In this capacity, despite its mild intrinsic toxicity, gemcitabine comes with high rates of severe mucositis when used in dosages exceeding 50 mg/m(2) per week. CCRT with low-dose gemcitabine provides a sufficient therapeutic ratio, combining clinical activity, similar to the higher-dose regimens, with lower toxicity. Further investigation is warranted.

Novel developments in the use of antimetabolites

Antimetabolites are the most widely used and most efficacious group of anticancer drugs. Antimetabolites are also the oldest rationally designed anticancer drugs, targeted against RNA and DNA, and can, therefore, be considered as the first generation of targeted drugs. Unfortunately, resistance often develops, leading to the design of new antimetabolites, which either have a novel mechanism of action, bypass resistance or in combination enhance the effect of other drugs, such as another antimetabolite, other DNA, or protein kinase targeted anticancer drugs. Several novel antimetabolites are in clinical development. The cytidine-analog fluorocyclopentenylcytosine (RX-3117) is active in gemcitabine-resistant tumors and is activated by uridine-cytidine-kinase, can be incorporated into RNA and DNA and can downregulate DNA-methyltransferase-1. TAS-114 is a new generation dUTPase inhibitor. dUTPase normally prevents incorporation of dUTP and of the 5FU-nucleotide FdUTP into DNA. However, inhibition of dUTPase will enhance their incorporation, thereby increasing thymine-less cell-death. The formulation TAS-102 (trifluorothymidine and thymidine-phosphorylase-inhibitor) acts by incorporation into DNA and has shown efficacy in tumors progressing on 5FU therapy. Gemcitabine and cytarabine prodrugs were tested in model systems and have entered clinical evaluation. The elaidic-acid prodrugs of gemcitabine (CP-4126, CO101) and cytarabine (elacytarabine) failed in randomized Phase III studies. Two other gemcitabine prodrugs LY2334737 (gemcitabine with a valproic acid at the 5'-position) and NUC1031 (a 5'-arylphosphoamidate prodrug, with a side-chain at the 5'-phosphate) are in early clinical development. In summary, several novel antimetabolites show promise in clinical development, either because of a novel mechanism of action, or clever combination or by innovative prodrug design.

Anticancer effects of brucine and gemcitabine combination in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells

This study was designed to investigate the combination effects of brucine and gemcitabine, each with anticancer properties, in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells in culture. With regard to cell viability, effects of both the drugs and their combinations were inversely proportional to dose and time. For various proportional drug combinations studied, combination effects were analysed using CompuSyn software. The analyses revealed synergistic and/or additive effects regarding cell viability, anchorage-independent growth and cell migration. Combination analyses exhibited diversified impacts of the type of combination treatment, namely pretreatment with either drug followed by exposure to the other, or treatment with both drugs at the same time. Compared with untreated cells, combination treatment of asynchronised MCF-7 cells resulted in 17.2 × decrease in G2 phase, increasing G1 (2.1 × ) and S (1.5 × ) phase cells in cell cycle analysis. Brucine, either individually or in combination, but not gemcitabine, inhibited NF-kB subunit (p65) expression in MCF-7 cells.

Chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: efficacy and mode of action

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a dreaded malignancy that every year causes half a million deaths worldwide. Being an aggressive cancer, its incidence exceeds 700,000 new cases per year worldwide with a median survival of 6-8 months. Despite advances in prognosis and early detection, effective HCC chemoprevention or treatment strategies are still lacking, therefore its dismal survival rate remains largely unchanged. This review will characterize currently available chemotherapeutic drugs used in the treatment of HCC. The respective mode(s) of action, side effects and recommendations will be also described for each drug.

5-Fluorouracil affects assembly of stress granules based on RNA incorporation

The antimetabolite 5-fluorouracil is a widely used chemotherapeutic for the treatment of several solid cancers. However, resistance to 5-fluorouracil remains a major drawback in its clinical use. In this study we report that treatment of HeLa cells with 5-fluorouracil resulted in de novo assembly of stress granules. Moreover, we revealed that stress granule assembly under stress conditions as well as disassembly is altered in cells treated with 5-fluorouracil. Notably, we discovered that RACK1, a protein mediating cell survival and apoptosis, is a component of 5-fluorouracil-induced stress granules. To explore the mode of action of 5-fluorouracil accountable for de novo stress granule assembly, we analyzed 5-fluorouracil metabolites and noticed that stress granule assembly is caused by RNA, not DNA incorporating 5-fluorouracil metabolites. Interestingly, we observed that other RNA incorporating drugs also cause assembly of stress granules. Thus, our results suggest that incorporation of chemotherapeutics into RNA may result in stress granule assembly with potential significance in chemoresistance.

Application of ProTide technology to gemcitabine: a successful approach to overcome the key cancer resistance mechanisms leads to a new agent (NUC-1031) in clinical development

Gemcitabine is a nucleoside analogue commonly used in cancer therapy but with limited efficacy due to a high susceptibility to cancer cell resistance. The addition of a phosphoramidate motif to the gemcitabine can protect it against many of the key cancer resistance mechanisms. We have synthesized a series of gemcitabine phosphoramidate prodrugs and screened for cytostatic activity in a range of different tumor cell lines. Among the synthesized compounds, one in particular (NUC-1031, 6f) was shown to be potent in vitro. Importantly, compared with gemcitabine, 6f activation was significantly less dependent on deoxycytidine kinase and on nucleoside transporters, and it was resistant to cytidine deaminase-mediated degradation. Moreover, 6f showed a significant reduction in tumor volumes in vivo in pancreatic cancer xenografts. The ProTide 6f is now in clinical development with encouraging efficacy signals in a Phase I/II study, which strongly supports the ProTide approach to generate promising new anticancer agents.

The dipeptide monoester prodrugs of floxuridine and gemcitabine-feasibility of orally administrable nucleoside analogs

Dipeptide monoester prodrugs of floxuridine and gemcitabine were synthesized. Their chemical stability in buffers, enzymatic stability in cell homogenates, permeability in mouse intestinal membrane along with drug concentration in mouse plasma, and anti-proliferative activity in cancer cells were determined and compared to their parent drugs. Floxuridine prodrug was more enzymatically stable than floxuridine and the degradation from prodrug to parent drug works as the rate-limiting step. On the other hand, gemcitabine prodrug was less enzymatically stable than gemcitabine. Those dipeptide monoester prodrugs exhibited 2.4- to 48.7-fold higher uptake than their parent drugs in Caco-2, Panc-1, and AsPC-1 cells. Floxuridine and gemcitabine prodrugs showed superior permeability in mouse jejunum to their parent drugs and exhibited the higher drug concentration in plasma after in situ mouse perfusion. Cell proliferation assays in ductal pancreatic cancer cells, AsPC-1 and Panc-1, indicated that dipeptide prodrugs of floxuridine and gemcitabine were more potent than their parent drugs. The enhanced potency of nucleoside analogs was attributed to their improved membrane permeability. The prodrug forms of 5′-l-phenylalanyl-l-tyrosyl-floxuridine and 5′-l-phenylalanyl-l-tyrosyl-gemcitabine appeared in mouse plasma after the permeation of intestinal membrane and the first-pass effect, suggesting their potential for the development of oral dosage form for anti-cancer agents.

Synthesis and cytostatic evaluation of 4-N-alkanoyl and 4-N-alkyl gemcitabine analogues

The coupling of gemcitabine with functionalized carboxylic acids (C9-C13) or reactions of 4-N-tosylgemcitabine with the corresponding alkyl amines afforded 4-N-alkanoyl and 4-N-alkyl gemcitabine derivatives. The analogues with a terminal hydroxyl group on the alkyl chain were efficiently fluorinated under conditions that are compatible with protocols for (18)F labeling. The 4-N-alkanoylgemcitabines showed potent cytostatic activities in the low nanomolar range against a panel of tumor cell lines, whereas cytotoxicity of the 4-N-alkylgemcitabines were in the low micromolar range. The cytotoxicity for the 4-N-alkanoylgemcitabine analogues was reduced approximately by 2 orders of magnitude in the 2'-deoxycytidine kinase (dCK)-deficient CEM/dCK(-) cell line, whereas cytotoxicity of the 4-N-alkylgemcitabines was only 2-5 times lower. None of the compounds acted as efficient substrates for cytosolic dCK; therefore, the 4-N-alkanoyl analogues need to be converted first to gemcitabine to display a significant cytostatic potential, whereas 4-N-alkyl derivatives attain modest activity without measurable conversion to gemcitabine.

Targeting ribonucleotide reductase for cancer therapy

INTRODUCTION

Ribonucleotide reductase (RR) is a unique enzyme, because it is responsible for reducing ribonucleotides to their corresponding deoxyribonucleotides, which are the building blocks required for DNA replication and repair. Dysregulated RR activity is associated with genomic instability, malignant transformation and cancer development. The use of RR inhibitors, either as a single agent or combined with other therapies, has proven to be a promising approach for treating solid tumors and hematological malignancies.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers recent publications in the area of RR, which include: i) the structure, function and regulation of RR; ii) the roles of RR in cancer development; iii) the classification, mechanisms and clinical application of RR inhibitors for cancer therapy and iv) strategies for developing novel RR inhibitors in the future.

EXPERT OPINION

Exploring the possible nonenzymatic roles of RR subunit proteins in carcinogenesis may lead to new rationales for developing novel anticancer drugs. Updated information about the structure and holoenzyme models of RR will help in identifying potential sites in the protein that could be targets for novel RR inhibitors. Determining RR activity and subunit levels in clinical samples will provide a rational platform for developing personalized cancer therapies that use RR inhibitors.

Metabolism, mechanism of action and sensitivity profile of fluorocyclopentenylcytosine (RX-3117; TV-1360)

A novel cytidine analog fluorocyclopentenylcytosine (RX-3117; TV-1360) was characterized for its cytotoxicity in a 59-cell line panel and further characterized for cytotoxicity, metabolism and mechanism of action in 15 additional cancer cell lines, including gemcitabine-resistant variants. In both panels sensitivity varied 75-fold (IC50: 0.4- > 30 μM RX-3117). RX-3117 showed a different sensitivity profile compared to cyclopentenyl-cytosine (CPEC) and azacytidine, substrates for uridine-cytidine-kinase (UCK). Dipyridamole, an inhibitor of the equilibrative-nucleoside-transporter protected against RX-3117. Uridine and cytidine protected against RX-3117, but deoxycytidine (substrate for deoxycytidine-kinase [dCK]) not, although it protected against gemcitabine, demonstrating that RX-3117 is a substrate for UCK and not for dCK. UCK activity was abundant in all cell lines, including the gemcitabine-resistant variants. RX-3117 was a very poor substrate for cytidine deaminase (66,000-fold less than gemcitabine). RX-3117 was rapidly metabolised to its nucleotides predominantly the triphosphate, which was highest in the most sensitive cells (U937, A2780) and lowest in the least sensitive (CCRF-CEM). RX-3117 did not significantly affect cytidine and uridine nucleotide pools. Incorporation of RX-3117 into RNA and DNA was higher in sensitive A2780 and low in insensitive SW1573 cells. In sensitive U937 cells 1 μM RX-3117 resulted in 90% inhibition of RNA synthesis but 100 μM RX-3117 was required in A2780 and CCRF-CEM cells. RX-3117 at IC50 values did not affect the integrity of RNA. DNA synthesis was completely inhibited in sensitive U937 cells at 1 μM, but in other cells even higher concentrations only resulted in a partial inhibition. At IC50 values RX-3117 downregulated the expression of DNA methyltransferase. In conclusion, RX-3117 showed a completely different sensitivity profile compared to gemcitabine and CPEC, its uptake is transporter dependent and is activated by UCK. RX-3117 is incorporated into RNA and DNA, did not affect RNA integrity, depleted DNA methyltransferase and inhibited RNA and DNA synthesis. Nucleotide formation is related with sensitivity.

The role of Bax and Bcl-2 in gemcitabine-mediated cytotoxicity in uveal melanoma cells

Gemcitabine (GEM), a new cytotoxic agent, was shown to be effective against uveal melanoma (UM) which is noted for its resistance to chemotherapy. In this study, we found the different sensitivities to GEM in UM cell lines and identified apoptotic cell death as the cause of GEM cytotoxicity. Both UM cell lines showed an increase in Bax protein levels and activation of cleaved Caspase 3. Additionally, SP6.5 cells showed a gradual increase in Bcl-2 expression over time, whereas VUP cells showed almost none. After interfering in the expression of Bcl-2, the sensitivity to GEM was obviously enhanced in SP6.5 cells. These results suggest that an increase in Bax plays a crucial role in apoptotic cell death induced by GEM in the absence of p53. Moreover, inhibition of Bcl-2 expression can efficiently enhance the cytotoxic effect of, and sensitivity to, GEM in UM cells.

Adjuvant pharmacotherapy in the management of elderly patients with pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the fourth or fifth leading cause of death from cancer in Western industrialized countries. Surgical resection is the only chance of cure, but only 15-20 % of cases are potentially resectable at presentation, and despite complete resection, the overall prognosis remains relatively poor. Adjuvant therapy has modestly improved cure rates. The majority of patients with pancreatic cancer are over the age of 65 years. But this age group is underrepresented within clinical trials, and it is unknown whether older patients achieve similar results to younger ones in terms of survival and treatment tolerance. In addition, there are no clinical trials dedicated to the elderly. Retrospective studies coming from the non-resectable setting provide some understanding on outcomes in older patients with PDAC. To date, we can reasonably argue that selected elderly patients with PDAC can benefit from curative surgery and postoperative chemotherapy as do their younger counterparts, without a significant increase in morbidity and mortality. Gemcitabine should be preferred to 5-fluorouracil on the basis of a better risk-benefit balance.

Clinical Phase I and Pharmacology Study of Gemcitabine (2', 2'-Difluorodeoxycytidine) Administered in a Two-Weekly Schedule

Gemcitabine (dFdC) was tested in a Phase I trial at 14 doses (40-5700 mg/m(2)), administered every 2 weeks as a (1/2) -h infusion to 52 patients with refractory solid cancer. Gemcitabine and its deaminated metabolite difluorodeoxyuridine (dFdU), measured with HPLC, reached plasma peak levels of 2-3 microM at 40 mg/m(2) which increased to 512 microM at 5700 mg/m(2). Gemcitabine was eliminated rapidly with a t(1/2) beta of 2.3-15.8 min in the 40-5700 mg/m(2) dose range, with one exception of 38 min at 4500 mg/m(2) . dFdU was still present at a plateau of +/- 20 microM from 4-24 h at doses >960 mg/m(2). Up to 3650 mg/m(2) linear pharmacokinetics were observed for gemcitabine, while those for dFdU were linear over the whole range. Gemcitabine clearance varied between 1.5-12.6 l/min and was 1.5-fold higher in males than in females (p= 0.024); its volume of distribution was 45.2-248 l. In lymphocytes peak levels of the active metabolite dFdCTP were 100-380 pmol/10( 6 )cells in the first course. Apparently a plateau was reached which was confirmed by incubation of white blood cells with increasing gemcitabine concentrations up to 500 microM, reaching a plateau of about 350 pmol/10(6 )cells; in contrast in cancer cells this concentration dependence did not exist and accumulation reached about 1590 pmol/10( 6 )cells. In tumors isolated from patients treated with gemcitabine dFdCTP reached about 70 pmol/g wet weight. Gemcitabine itself was eliminated only to a limited extent in the urine, but dFdU was eliminated almost completely in the urine in the first 24 h (51-92%). In conclusion, dFdC was rapidly eliminated in contrast to dFdU, which was present for at least 18 h, as well as dFdCTP in lymphocytes.

Prognostic predictive values of gemcitabine sensitivity-related gene products for unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer treated with gemcitabine alone

BACKGROUND

Gemcitabine is a pyrimidine nucleoside analog that is a commonly used chemotherapeutic agent for unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer (BTC). Several molecules involved in gemcitabine metabolism, including human equilibrative nucleoside transporter (hENT1), deoxycytidine kinase (dCK), and ribonucleotide reductase subunit M1 (RRM1), have been investigated as predictive biomarkers of gemcitabine efficacy, mostly in pancreatic cancer. The aim of this study is to clarify which biomarker is the most reliable among hENT1, dCK, and RRM1 to predict survival in patients with advanced BTC treated with gemcitabine alone.

METHODS

The analysis was performed on samples from 28 patients with unresectable or recurrent BTC who were treated with gemcitabine alone as first-line therapy. The starting date of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the date of first treatment with gemcitabine. Intratumoral hENT1, dCK, and RRM1 expressions were examined by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

The expressions of hENT1, dCK, and RRM1 had no significant relationships with age, gender, primary tumor site, recurrence/unresectable, or histological type. Among the three molecules, only hENT1 expression was a significant factor affecting OS and PFS in univariate analysis; OS was 11.4 months for high hENT1 expression versus 5.7 months for low, P = 0.0057; PFS was 7.7 months for high versus 2.5 months for low, P = 0.0065. Multivariate analyses also identified hENT1 expression as an independent predictive factor for OS.

CONCLUSIONS

hENT1 is the most reliable predictive marker of survival in patients with advanced BTC treated with gemcitabine.