The effect of serum dexamethasone concentrations in the dexamethasone suppression test

Cortisol and the Dexamethasone Suppression Test as a Biomarker for Melancholic Depression: A Narrative Review

The dexamethasone suppression test (DST) assesses the functionality of the HPA axis and can be regarded as the first potential biomarker in psychiatry. In 1981, a group of researchers at the University of Michigan published a groundbreaking paper regarding its use for diagnosing melancholic depression, reporting a diagnostic sensitivity of 67% and a specificity of 95%. While this study generated much enthusiasm and high expectations in the field of biological psychiatry, subsequent studies produced equivocal results, leading to the test being rejected by the American Psychiatric Association. The scientific reasons leading to the rise and fall of the DST are assessed in this review, suggestions are provided as to how the original test can be improved, and its potential applications in clinical psychiatry are discussed. An improved, standardized, and validated version of the DST would be a biologically meaningful and useful biomarker in psychiatry, providing a tool for clinicians caring for depressed patients in the areas of diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis, and predicting the risk of suicide. Additionally, such a test could be a crucial part in the generation of biologically homogenous patient cohorts, necessary for the successful development of new psychotropic medications.

Association between posttest dexamethasone and cortisol concentrations in the 1 mg overnight dexamethasone suppression test

It has been suggested that comparison of posttest dexamethasone and cortisol concentrations may improve the evaluation of the dexamethasone suppression test (DST) for Cushing's syndrome. In particular, this would be reasonable if posttest cortisol differs by dexamethasone levels within the range that is usually attained in the DST. Using fractional polynomial regression, we therefore studied the association between posttest 0800 h dexamethasone and cortisol levels in 53 subjects without Cushing's syndrome who were tested with the 1 mg overnight DST. Plasma dexamethasone was associated with plasma cortisol (P<0.001), and the regression line suggested a strong negative association related to dexamethasone levels <5 nmol/l. However, among the 94% of subjects with plasma dexamethasone >5.0 nmol/l, there was no association between dexamethasone and cortisol levels (P=0.55). In conclusion, subjects tested with the 1 mg overnight DST usually attain an 0800 h plasma dexamethasone >5 nmol/l, and plasma cortisol does not differ by plasma dexamethasone in these subjects. This suggests that routine comparison of dexamethasone and cortisol levels may not be a useful approach to improve the performance of the 1 mg DST. However, dexamethasone measurements may identify subjects with inadequately low plasma dexamethasone and may therefore be of value when retesting subjects with possibly false-positive DST results.

Dexamethasone metabolism in dexamethasone suppression test suppressors and nonsuppressors

BACKGROUND

Variable dexamethasone kinetics is a possible confound in the dexamethasone suppression test. Modifications to include dexamethasone plasma levels and specific dexamethasone "windows" have been proposed. Our study aims to validate our proposed dexamethasone windows in an independent sample of 121 subjects.

METHODS

We performed dexamethasone suppression tests in 162 subjects with mixed psychiatric diagnoses. Dexamethasone levels and beta-phase half-life of dexamethasone were computed for suppressors and nonsuppressors.

RESULTS

Dexamethasone levels were lower in nonsuppressors than in suppressors. Dexamethasone levels correlated inversely with cortisol levels in the total sample, but were nonsignificant or weakly associated in those samples restricted to the windows. The beta-phase half-life of dexamethasone was shorter in nonsuppressors. The dexamethasone windows were validated at 3:00 PM and 10:00 PM. We propose 4.0 ng/mL as a revised upper limit of the 8:00 AM dexamethasone window.

CONCLUSIONS

The plasma dexamethasone level is confirmed as a confound in the dexamethasone suppression test through more rapid dexamethasone clearance in nonsuppressors. Application of dexamethasone windows will reduce this source of test variance.

The lower limits of dexamethasone window in Chinese depressives

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown wide variation in plasma dexamethasone (DEX) concentrations following a standard 1-mg dexamethasone suppression test (DST), and significantly lower DEX concentrations in DST nonsuppressors compared with suppressors, suggesting that DEX pharmacokinetics/bioavailability is an important variable associated with DST nonsuppression.

METHODS

To determine the effect of plasma DEX levels on the DST in Chinese depressives, we measured plasma DEX and post-DEX cortisol levels at 4:00 PM in a group of 50 depressed outpatients, 28 anxiety outpatients, and 33 normal subjects during the course of 1-mg oral overnight DST.

RESULTS

We found a significant difference in the plasma DEX levels between DST nonsuppressors and suppressors in the depression group and overall subject population, and a significant negative correlation between the plasma DEX and cortisol levels in the depression, anxiety, and total groups. Within a DEX "window", the DST performance was enhanced, whereas the relationships between plasma DEX and post-DEX cortisol levels remained equally strong.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support a relationship between plasma DEX and post-DEX cortisol levels, a relationship that might be superimposed on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Comparing our "window" range with those of previous studies, we suggest that Chinese depressives may have lower limits of plasma DEX window, and that ethnicity may be an intervening variable in both DST response and pharmacokinetics of DEX.

Plasma dexamethasone concentration and cortisol response during manic episodes

BACKGROUND

Despite the widespread study of the dexamethasone suppression test (DST) in patients diagnosed with major depression, it has been less well studied during manic and mixed states of bipolar disorder.

METHODS

Cortisol response to the administration of 1 mg of dexamethasone was studied in 44 patients diagnosed bipolar disorder, manic (n = 37) or mixed (n = 7). Dexamethasone levels and cortisol responses were compared between these groups. Four patients initially meeting criteria for bipolar disorder, mixed, and 7 patients initially meeting criteria for bipolar disorder, manic, all of whom were characterized as DST nonsuppressors, were retested after remission.

RESULTS

Dexamethasone levels were lower and cortisol levels higher in those patients diagnosed bipolar disorder, mixed. An inverse correlation was found between log-transformed dexamethasone levels and log-transformed cortisol levels at 3 PM (r = -.619, p < or = .001) and 10 PM (r = -.501, p < or = .001). In those subjects retested after remission, dexamethasone levels were higher and cortisol levels lower than during the manic and mixed states.

CONCLUSIONS

Disturbances in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis are observed frequently during mixed states of bipolar disorder, but are also not uncommon in purely manic episodes. These changes appear to be state dependent and revert with treatment.

An augmented escape of androstenedione from suppression by dexamethasone in melancholia: relationships to intact ACTH and cortisol nonsuppression

To further examine the association between basal and postdexamethasone (DST) pituitary and adrenal activity in depression, the authors measured intact adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), androstenedione and cortisol, both in baseline and post-DST conditions, in 63 depressed subjects (14 minor, 33 simple major and 16 melancholic subjects). It was found that post-DST androstenedione, cortisol and ACTH values were significantly higher in melancholic than in minor depressed subjects. There were highly significant correlations between plasma androstenedione and ACTH both in baseline and post-DST conditions. The significant intercategory differences in post-DST androstenedione were determined by differences in post-DST ACTH. Basal and post-DST androstenedione values were significantly higher in men than in women and both values were significantly and negatively related to age. There were highly significant, positive relationships between cortisol and ACTH and between cortisol and androstenedione both in baseline and post-DST conditions. The results corroborate our hypotheses that, in depression, pituitary (ACTH) and adrenal (cortisol and androstenedione) hormonal secretion are tightly coupled in post-DST conditions and that the augmented escape of ACTH-target hormones in melancholia is, in part, related to that of pituitary ACTH.

The dexamethasone suppression test in children and adolescents: a review and a controlled study

Dexamethasone Suppression Test (DST) studies conducted in children and adolescents are reviewed, together with factors hypothesized to explain discrepancies in rates of DST nonsuppression across studies. These factors are then examined in a controlled study of 27 adolescents with major depressive disorder (MDD) and 34 normal controls (NC). Subjects were given 1 mg of dexamethasone at 11:00 PM, and the following day serum samples for cortisol were collected each hr from 8 AM to 11 PM through an indwelling catheter. There were no significant differences found between the MDD and NC subjects on any postdexamethasone cortisol measure. Further, cortisol suppressors and nonsuppressors were not distinguished by any of the hypothesized factors identified from the review, including inpatient status, presence of suicidality, endogenous features, psychotic symptoms, or prior history of MDD. Questions about the appropriateness of the 1 mg dose of dexamethasone (currently the standard dose used with adolescents) are raised, together with a discussion of the effects of stress on DST findings.

Dexamethasone suppression test in children with major depressive disorder

The authors report a study of 24-hour serial cortisol determinations, measured during baseline and after the administration of 0.25 and 0.5 mg of dexamethasone in a sample of predominantly outpatient children with major depressive disorder, nonaffective psychiatric controls, and normal controls. In this sample, 24-hour baseline cortisol and the dexamethasone suppression test (DST) do not discriminate between the three groups. In addition, the authors measured 24-hour serum dexamethasone levels. There were no significant between group differences in serum dexamethasone. These results raise questions as to the utility of this test in the diagnosis of affective disorders in children. Possible reasons for the discrepancies in the dexamethasone suppression test results between in- and outpatient studies are discussed.

Effect of high plasma dexamethasone levels on DST sensitivity: dose-response study in depressed patients and controls

The aim of this study was to examine cortisol dynamics over a range of plasma dexamethasone (DEX) levels using a two-dose dexamethasone suppression test (DST). Two doses of DEX (0.5 and 1.5 mg) were administered in a randomized crossover design to 29 inpatients with major depression and 26 controls to identify the upper range of plasma DEX levels that would allow reliable interpretation of DST results. It was hypothesized that due to inappropriately high plasma DEX levels following 1.5 mg, several depressed patients would switch from suppressors after the 1.5 mg dose to nonsuppressors after 0.5 mg. In contrast, the nondepressed controls with high DEX levels following 1.5 mg would remain suppressors after the lower dose. Fourteen patients were identified as having high 4 p.m. DEX levels (greater than 4 nmol/l) after the 1.5 mg DST. Cortisol was suppressed in all of the subjects with high DEX levels. After 0.5 mg, five of the eight depressed patients with high DEX levels switched to nonsuppressors. In contrast, all six controls with high DEX levels remained suppressors. These results indicate that patients with high DEX levels after a 1 mg DST should be retested with a lower dose. This strategy enhances the sensitivity of the DST without loss of specificity.

A longitudinal evaluation of dexamethasone and cortisol plasma concentrations in the dexamethasone suppression test before and during treatment with antidepressant drugs

Thirty depressed in- and outpatients received serial dexamethasone suppression tests (DSTs). Plasma dexamethasone and cortisol concentrations were drawn at 1600 on the day following a 1-mg oral dose of dexamethasone. The first DST was performed after patients were drug-free for a period of 1 week; the second, third, and fourth DSTs while patients received antidepressant medication. Dexamethasone and cortisol concentrations drawn in the drug-free period correlated significantly. The cortisol to dexamethasone ratio changed significantly with time in DST nonsuppressors, suggesting that nonsuppression is associated with an altered pharmacodynamic response of the hypothalamopituitary-adrenal axis to dexamethasone during depression. When dexamethasone concentrations from the drug-free period were compared with those drawn during antidepressant treatment, no significant differences were noted.

Do serum dexamethasone levels improve the DST?

Some investigators have reported that dexamethasone suppression test (DST) accuracy might be improved by incorporating dexamethasone concentrations ([dex]) into test results. Using receiver operating characteristic methods, we evaluated data from four studies in which cortisol and dexamethasone levels were measured simultaneously at one or more times after drug ingestion. We compared DST accuracy using cortisol alone with various diagnostic indices incorporating [dex]. In none of the 21 comparisons did the [dex] factor enhance diagnostic performance.

Prediction of the DST results in depressives by means of urinary-free cortisol excretion, dexamethasone levels, and age

This study investigates the relationships between cortisol escape from suppression by dexamethasone during a depressive episode, and the baseline activity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, circulating dexamethasone levels, and age. To this end, we measured urinary-free cortisol (UFC) excretion in 24-hr urine samples and the 8 AM cortisol and dexamethasone levels after administration of 1 mg dexamethasone in 50 depressive patients. We found that up to 54% of the variance in the postdexamethasone cortisol values could be explained by the multiple regression on UFC, age, and dexamethasone levels. By utilizing these three parameters, the dexamethasone suppression test (DST) nonsuppressor/suppressor state was correctly identified in 92% of the subjects. It was shown that an important part of the variance in postdexamethasone cortisol is actually background variance, irrelevant to depression and produced by the cumulative effects of the three aforementioned parameters. Only a small part (less than 20%) of the variance in postdexamethasone cortisol is determined by the actual depressive state. It was concluded that (1) baseline hypersecretion of cortisol, (2) decrements in the bioavailability of the test substance, (3) increasing age, and (4) the depressive state per se--all of which are cumulative--contribute independently to cortisol escape from suppression by 1 mg dexamethasone.

The effect of dexamethasone dosage upon plasma cortisol and dexamethasone during the DST

To investigate the effect of dexamethasone dosage upon the outcome of the dexamethasone suppression test (DST) and the role of concurrent plasma dexamethasone concentrations, four different dexamethasone dosages were administered to 119 hospitalized depressed patients (0.5 mg: n = 12; 1.0 mg: n = 30; 1.5 mg: n = 42; 2.0 mg: n = 35). Independent of the dosage, dexamethasone plasma concentrations at 4.00 p.m. were lower in DST non-suppressors than in suppressors, although differences were statistically significant only for the 1.5-mg and 2.0-mg dosages. Our findings confirm recent reports that the actual plasma concentration of dexamethasone at 4.00 p.m. does not determine DST outcome.

Plasma dexamethasone concentrations and the dexamethasone suppression test

Altered bioavailability or altered pharmacokinetics of dexamethasone (dex) may contribute to a positive Dexamethasone Suppression Test (DST) in psychiatric patients. We measured plasma dex and plasma cortisol concentrations in 32 patients with primary major depressive disorder (MDD), 14 patients with other psychiatric disorders, and 16 normal controls. Cortisol was measured by the competitive protein binding (CPB) assay and dex by RIA (IgG Corp.). Additionally, cortisol was measured by a fluorescent polarization immunoassay (FPIA) available on the Abbott TDx analyzer in an attempt to validate this method for use in the DST. The agreement between FPIA and CPB cortisol results was excellent. Depressed nonsuppressors, by definition, had significantly higher mean plasma cortisol concentrations than depressed suppressors, psychiatric controls, and normal volunteers at 8:00 AM, 3:00 PM, and 10:00 PM postdex. When DST nonsuppressors and suppressors were compared regardless of diagnostic group, plasma dex concentrations were significantly lower (p less than 0.01) in the DST nonsuppressors. There was a significant negative correlation between plasma cortisol levels and plasma dex levels across all subjects at 8:00 AM (r = -0.365, n = 44, p less than 0.05). When the subjects were sorted by diagnostic category, there was a strong, but not statistically significant, trend toward lower plasma dex concentrations in the melancholic nonsuppressors versus the melancholic suppressors and between the psychiatric control non-suppressors and the corresponding suppressor group. These relationships disappeared when we restricted our analyses to an empirically derived middle range of plasma dex concentrations within which the DST results were considered to be valid. We conclude that bioavailability or pharmacokinetics of dex may significantly contribute to DST results. Further investigation is needed to determine whether or not the quantification of dex and its metabolites and their determination at which specific timepoints during the DST will enhance the predictive or interpretive value of the DST in psychiatric patients.

Neuroendocrine aspects of primary endogenous depression: IX. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of the dexamethasone suppression index vs. the dexamethasone suppression test in patients and controls

The dexamethasone suppression index (DSI), which is the product of the postdexamethasone (DEX) serum DEX concentration and the post-DEX serum cortisol concentration, has been suggested to be a more sensitive discriminative test for depression than the standard DEX suppression test (DST). We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to examine the DSI, calculated in several ways, versus the standard DST in a sample of 40 endogenous major depressives and 40 matched normal control subjects. The ROC analysis indicated that the DSI offers no advantage over the standard DST, regardless of which criterion values are used to define cortisol nonsuppression. Serum DEX determinations appear to have value primarily as an indicator of the minimum DEX concentration necessary for an accurate DST.

Dexamethasone kinetics in depressed patients before and after clinical response

Dexamethasone pharmacokinetics were measured in 19 depressed patients, 10 dexamethasone suppression test (DST) nonsuppressors and nine suppressors, following a 1 mg oral dose in tablet form at 2300 h. Median dexamethasone concentrations were significantly lower in the nonsuppressors from 3-16 hr post-administration. Nonsuppressors had a significantly lower area under the curve than suppressors, and plasma clearance was significantly faster in the nonsuppressors than in the suppressors. Eleven patients, six nonsuppressors and five suppressors, agreed to a repeat DST after clinical improvement when all six nonsuppressors had normal DST responses. There were no significant differences between the median dexamethasone concentrations, or any of the pharmacokinetic parameters measured, of the "normalising" nonsuppressors and the suppressors. Dexamethasone kinetics were altered in depressed nonsuppressors but became normal with remission of depressive symptoms and normalisation of the DST response.

HPA axis disturbance in obsessive-compulsive disorder

Twenty nondepressed outpatients with DSM-III obsessive-compulsive disorder entered a 10-week placebo-controlled study of clomipramine and underwent a 1-mg dexamethasone suppression test (DST) at baseline; 11 had a repeat DST at the end of treatment: Nonsuppression was rare. When compared to 82 previously described outpatients with panic disorder studied in a similar fashion, OCD patients had postdexamethasone cortisol values that were substantially lower and more stable over time. Results within the OCD group closely resembled those from a group of never-ill controls.

The influences of dexamethasone levels on the predictive value of the DST for unipolar major depression and the relationships between post-dexamethasone cortisol and ACTH levels

To investigate the relationships between dexamethasone (DEX) and post-DEX cortisol and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) levels, the authors measured DEX at 8.00 a.m. and post-DEX cortisol and ACTH levels at 8.00 a.m. and 4.00 p.m. in 72 depressed patients categorized according to DSM-III. Cortisol non-suppressors exhibited significantly (P = 0.0006) decreased levels of DEX compared to suppressors. DEX levels at 8.00 a.m. explained 21.1% of the variance in the post-DEX cortisol values at 8.00 a.m. and 34.5% of those at 4.00 p.m. DEX levels were not significantly different among minor depressives (300.40, 309.00), major depressives without melancholia (296.X2) or with melancholia and/or psychotic features (296.X3, 296.X4). In the latter the post-DEX cortisol was significantly increased compared to all other depressives and these differences remained significant even after adjusting for the variations in DEX (by means of regression analysis). Also the diagnostic performance of the post-DEX cortisol values for major depression with associated features versus minor depression was not substantially affected when the DEX levels were accounted for. ACTH levels after DEX were shown to correlate significantly (P less than 0.05) and negatively with DEX. Although post-DEX ACTH levels did not differ among the DSM-III diagnostic categories, cortisol non-suppressors averaged significantly (P = 0.0004) higher ACTH levels than suppressors.

Pharmacoendocrinology of major depression

Major depressives often have abnormalities in the secretion patterns of their anterior pituitary hormones and target endocrine gland hormones. There are changes in both basal hormone secretion and the responses of these hormones to perturbation tests. Considerable work has been done attempting to develop a clinical application for some of these changes as biological state markers of endogenous depression. Prominent among the changes is an overactivity of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) axis. The dexamethasone suppression test (DST), as a reflection of HPA axis activity, has been the most thoroughly investigated "biological test" in psychiatry to date. Considerably fewer studies have addressed more fundamental issues of HPA axis regulation in depression, such as the relationship between pre-DST cortisol hypersecretion and DST outcome. The next most widely investigated endocrine axis in depression has been the hypothalamo-pituitary-thyroid (HPT) axis. Most studies have dealt with the TSH response to exogenously administered thyrotropin releasing hormone. While blunted TSH responses have been found in depressives compared with normal controls, the frequency of blunted responses in other types of psychiatric patients has made this test marginally useful for differential diagnosis. The reported changes in other hormone axes, for example the blunted growth hormone response to several challenges noted in depressed patients, have not been investigated sufficiently thoroughly to support their general clinical use at present.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The significance of HPA axis disturbance in panic disorder

Agoraphobic and panic disorder patients underwent 1-mg Dexamethasone Suppression Tests (DST) before, during, and after an 8-week trial of diazepam, alprazolam, or placebo. Previously described, never-ill controls underwent similar testing. At baseline, 21 of 82 (25.6%) panic disorder and 5 of 38 (13.2%) controls were nonsuppressors. This difference grew more marked with multiple testing over a 2-month period; 18 of 44 (40.9%) panic disorder patients were nonsuppressors on at least 1 of 3 tests compared with only 5 of 35 (14.3%) controls (p = 0.006). DST results were related to severity, but not to the presence or absence, of depressive syndromes. Control for plasma dexamethasone levels left highly significant differences in postdexamethasone cortisol across diagnostic groups. Neither DST results nor plasma dexamethasone levels changed in concert with clinical change, and type of treatment had little differential effect on these measures. Nor did DST results predict subsequent course when active treatment was extended by 6 months. However, DST results during the initial 8 weeks of treatment were strongly related to relapse when medications were tapered, even though this occurred 6 months after the last DST.

The plasma dexamethasone window: evidence supporting its usefulness to validate dexamethasone suppression test results

Two doses of dexamethasone (DEX) (0.5 and 1.0 mg) were administered in a randomized crossover design to 31 patients with major depression, 9 healthy controls, and 14 nondepressed psychiatric patients. Using this modified Dexamethasone Suppression Test (DST), minimum DEX levels of 6 nmol/liter at 8:00 AM and 2.0 nmol/liter at 4:00 PM were required to achieve reliable suppression of cortisol in healthy controls and nondepressed psychiatric patients. Failure to achieve these minimum plasma DEX levels was associated with similar rates of nonsuppression in both depressed and nondepressed patients, thereby reducing the specificity of the DST. Conversely, high DEX levels greater than 13 nmol/liter at 8:00 AM or 4.0 nmol/liter at 4:00 PM were associated with abnormal "suppressibility" in depressed patients, thereby reducing the sensitivity of the test. Controlling for plasma DEX concentrations by selecting a test result that fell within a plasma DEX window at 8:00 AM and 4:00 PM increased the sensitivity and specificity of the DST. Significant differences in plasma DEX between suppressors and nonsuppressors were no longer evident when comparing patients with adequate DEX levels, thus ensuring that cortisol escape reflected HPA axis changes associated with depression and not peripheral mechanisms responsible for the availability of DEX. These results suggest that the clinical utility of the DST would be significantly enhanced by extending the standard 1.0-mg DST and retesting those patients with levels outside the DEX window with a higher or lower dose. The data also indicate that the measurement of plasma DEX is essential to validly interpret DST status and highlight the need to standardize DEX assays to compare DST results between research centers.

Assessing improvements in the dexamethasone suppression test using receiver operating characteristics analysis

This article demonstrates methods by which receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis may be used to evaluate and improve the Dexamethasone Suppression Test (DST). ROC indices provide a description of nonbinary diagnostic tests that is independent of any particular cutoff and that allows investigators to use rigorous mathematical methods for selecting cutoffs and assessing overall performance. In this study, ROC analyses of previously published data suggest that (1) the accuracy of the DST might be improved by using a 0.5-mg oral steroid dose; (2) incorporation of dexamethasone serum levels does not improve the performance of the DST; and (3) the serum cortisol level used to define "no suppression" (or DST "positivity") should be varied to take into account diagnostic alternatives, prior probability of affective disorder, and the clinical goal for performing the test (e.g., maximizing utility, increasing information).

Specific determination of plasma dexamethasone by HPLC and RIA--application to standard dexamethasone suppression test in psychiatric patients

Three radioimmunoassays (RIA), with or without preparative HPLC, were applied to the monitoring of plasma dexamethasone (DXM) levels during standard dexamethasone suppression test (DST) in psychiatric patients. Due to the robotic ease of the fully automated HPLC process, precision of the chromatographic assay was equivalent to that of the direct assays, but prepurification improved both sensitivity and specificity. These improvements allowed the elucidation of the following features: (1) half (36) of the patients (68) displayed infranormal DXM levels (less than or equal to 0.40 ng/ml) whatever the cortisol response; (2) 22% (15) patients (68) with DXM levels in the low control range showed a strong inhibition of cortisol suppression. These observations raise some doubts on the validity of the DST test and introduce the following questions. (1) What is the dependence of cortisol suppression upon DXM absorption and catabolism? (2) Does plasma DXM measurement several hours after its physiological action still reflect its effect on the hypothalamo-hypophyseal axis? (3) What is the reliability of DXM direct assays when measuring low DXM levels in the presence of high cortisol?

Plasma dexamethasone and cortisol levels in depressed outpatients

We investigated the 1-mg dexamethasone suppression test (DST) in 41 outpatients with major depressive disorder assessing the role of dexamethasone blood level, age and basal cortisol on DST results. Non-suppressors (approximately 25% of patients) had lower dexamethasone levels, and post-dexamethasone cortisol was negatively correlated with plasma dexamethasone; these findings were more significant after covarying out age and basal cortisol, factors that were also significantly associated to non-suppressors. A subgroup of patients (n = 19) also had 0.75-mg and 2.0-mg DST to evaluate whether a threshold dexamethasone blood level existed; a dexamethasone blood level greater than 1.5 ng/ml converted all non-suppressors to suppressors. Implications of these findings are discussed.

Dexamethasone effects on numbers of cells in lymphocyte subpopulations: changes associated with major depression and DST nonsuppression

1. The authors studied the effects of administration of 1 mg of dexamethasone on the number of cells in discrete subpopulations of lymphocytes in major depressed and psychiatric control patients with depressive symptoms. 2. Dexamethasone significantly decreased the total lymphocyte count and numbers of T and helper T lymphocytes in control patients. 3. In contrast, dexamethasone failed to significantly decrease the numbers of cells in any of the subpopulations of lymphocytes studied in major depressed patients. 4. Among major depressed patients both DST suppressors and nonsuppressors were insensitive to the suppressive effects of dexamethasone on lymphocyte numbers. 5. However, in DST nonsuppressors, but not in DST suppressors, dexamethasone administration significantly increased the number of cytotoxic/suppressor T lymphocytes and natural killer cells. 6. The authors conclude that insensitivity to the suppressive effects of dexamethasone on lymphocyte numbers is specific to major depression and is not associated with DST status. However, DST nonsuppression is associated with a facilitating effect of dexamethasone on the number of cells in some subpopulations of lymphocytes.

Judgement of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical function in psychiatric patients by betamethasone-induced cortisol suppressibility

Betamethasone induced cortisol suppressibility was examined in 62 drug free consecutively admitted psychiatric inpatients. Betamethasone was choosen instead of the commonly used dexamethasone, because its double half-life compared to dexamethasone and its higher tissue availability. After a base-line evaluation with blood samples drawn at 8 a.m., 4 p.m., and 11 p.m., 0.5 mg or 1.0 mg betamethasone was given orally at 11 p.m. Postbetamethasone cortisol as well as betamethasone blood levels were then measured at the same time points as on the baseline day. In the groups receiving 1.0 mg betamethasone non-depressed patients had significantly (p less than 0.05) lower postbetamethasone cortisol levels than depressed patients for each time point measured whereas 0.5 mg betamethasone did not differentiate depressed from non-depressed patients. Patients with other depressions like schizoaffective psychosis-depressive subtype- or organic brain syndrome with depressive symptomatology demonstrated similar postbetamethasone cortisol profiles as the group of patients with major depression. Betamethasone plasma concentrations differed significantly (p less than 0.001) with respect to the oral dosage with higher values for the 1.0 mg betamethasone groups.

The dexamethasone suppression test in relation to symptomatology: preliminary findings controlling for serum dexamethasone concentrations

A diagnostically heterogeneous sample of psychiatric inpatients (n = 52) was administered the 1 mg dexamethasone suppression test (DST) shortly after hospital admission. Each was also assessed using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) and selected items of the Present State Examination (PSE) representing psychomotor retardation and anxiety. A potent determinant of postdexamethasone serum cortisol concentrations was found to be the level of serum dexamethasone concentration achieved following the oral dose. No relationship was found between postdexamethasone cortisol concentration and the scores on either the HRSD or an anxiety scale derived from selected PSE items. However, symptoms of psychomotor retardation were significantly related to postdexamethasone serum cortisol concentration, particularly when the serum dexamethasone concentrations were taken into account. It may be that DST nonsuppression in psychiatric patients is in part a reflection of the presence of psychomotor retardation, a phenomenon that cuts across diagnostic categories.

Plasma dexamethasone and the dexamethasone suppression test. Initial and follow-up tests in depressed patients

Plasma dexamethasone concentrations following oral dexamethasone administration were examined in 78 patients with major depression prior to and during treatment. The test-retest stability of plasma dexamethasone levels within patients was satisfactory with an overall significant positive correlation between tests for each patient. However, significant variability was noted in individual patients. Change in pre-DST cortisol and plasma dexamethasone levels were the two variables, in that order of importance, contributing to change in DST status. In studies examining the clinical utility of serial dexamethasone suppression tests as a guide to recovery from depression, the effect of variability in plasma dexamethasone concentrations should be taken into account.

Altered plasma dexamethasone and cortisol suppressibility in patients with panic disorders

Some abnormalities in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis in patients with panic disorders were recently reported. The possibility that the disposition of dexamethasone, which has been reported to influence the Dexamethasone Suppression Test (DST), might be altered in this subgroup of patients has not, as yet, been reported. We report that 4:00 PM dexamethasone plasma concentrations following a 1-mg oral DST were significantly (p less than 0.01) lower in 23 patients with panic disorders (0.49 +/- 0.44 ng/ml) compared to 52 normal control subjects (1.09 +/- 0.64 ng/ml). This is in addition to the significantly higher (p less than 0.05) 4:00 PM postdexamethasone cortisol values per nanogram per milliliter of dexamethasone in the panic disorder patients compared to normal controls (17.7 +/- 29.6 versus 5.0 +/- 11.2 micrograms/dl). The mean percent suppression of cortisol from baseline in panic disorder was normal despite one-half the dexamethasone concentrations in these subjects. The cortisol suppression versus dexamethasone concentration curve was also shifted lower (greater fraction of cortisol suppression) and to the left (toward lower dexamethasone concentrations). These results further suggest that the HPA system is indeed altered in panic disorders, but in a manner that is not readily apparent from the DST alone.

Serum dexamethasone concentrations in endogenous depressives before, during, and after treatment: preliminary observations

The 1.0-mg Dexamethasone (DEX) Suppression Test (DST) was performed in 10 endogenous depressives prior to treatment, during treatment, and again when the patients were medication- and symptom-free. Five of the 10 patients were DST escapers prior to treatment, and all 10 patients were DST suppressors following treatment. During treatment, 6 patients were DST escapers, 2 of them having been suppressors initially. There were no significant differences in serum DEX concentrations before, during, and after treatment in either the 5 DST escapers or the 5 DST suppressors. These results lend further support to the concept that reduced serum DEX concentrations are not the major factor underlying DST nonsuppression.

The dexamethasone suppression test for Japanese with eating disorders

A one-mg oral overnight dexamethasone suppression test (DST) was conducted on 22 inpatients with eating disorders. To confirm that the dexamethasone tablets had been ingested, we measured the plasma concentrations of dexamethasone the next morning (at 0900 hr after DST). The diagnosis of anorexia nervosa and bulimia was made according to the criteria for DSM-III, respectively. Of the 22 patients with eating disorders, 16 satisfied the criteria for anorexia nervosa and 6 for bulimia. The DST was carried out within 2 weeks of hospitalization on each patient. The subjects were given 1 mg of dexamethasone in the evening (at 2300 hr) and blood samples were collected the following day (at 0900, 1600 and 2100 hr, respectively). The plasma cortisol and dexamethasone levels were concurrently determined by RIA. The criterion for non-suppression was a failure to suppress the plasma cortisol levels below 5.0 micrograms/dl in any one of the three samples. All but one patient with bulimia had ingested the dexamethasone. Thirteen (62%) of 21 patients with eating disorders were nonsuppressors. We found a significant positive correlation between the plasma cortisol levels at 1600 hr or 2100 hr and a decrease in ideal body weight (n = 16, r = 0.613, p less than 0.05; r = 0.75, p less than 0.01, respectively) and a significant inverse relationship between the plasma dexamethasone levels at 0900 hr and the plasma cortisol levels at 1600 hr was recognized (n = 21, r = 0.631, p less than 0.01). These results suggest that the blood dexamethasone levels as well as body weight might contribute to the abnormalities of DST seen in patients with eating disorders.

Plasma dexamethasone kinetics during the DST after oral and intravenous administration of the test drug

We compared early biophase kinetics of dexamethasone in 33 patients with a major depression who received a DST either by an oral (n = 20) or an intravenous (n = 13) route. After an oral DST, the dexamethasone kinetics between 14 suppressors and 6 nonsuppressors were indistinguishable during the early distribution phase. However, elimination of dexamethasone from the circulation was significantly enhanced in DST nonsuppressors, resulting in an association of decreased plasma dexamethasone with elevated post-DST cortisol levels. Following intravenous DST administration, we identified 5 nonsuppressors and 8 suppressors whose plasma dexamethasone kinetics were indistinguishable, and during the elimination phase, were in the same order of magnitude as those of nonsuppressors after an oral DST. We suggest that the actual plasma concentration at the conventional post-DST sampling times does not reflect the biopotency of the test drug to suppress the pituitary adrenocortical activity. Plasma dexamethasone concentrations after an oral DST that were associated with nonsuppressed cortisol seem to be coherent phenomena of the underlying endocrine disturbance, the precise nature of which deserves further study.

Dexamethasone bioavailability: implications for DST research

The bioavailability of dexamethasone (DEX) has recently been demonstrated to be a critical factor in determining Dexamethasone Suppression Test (DST) status in psychiatric patients. This brief review focuses on several aspects of DEX bioavailability as they relate to the use of the DST in neuroendocrine research. Several methodologies, including radioimmunoassay, high-performance liquid chromatography, and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry are available for quantification of DEX in biological fluids, although few detailed comparisons between methods have been reported. Surprisingly, little systematic research on the metabolism of DEX has been reported, but it appears that hepatic rather than renal mechanisms are the major source of DEX elimination. The marked variability in serum DEX levels following oral administration in psychiatric patients is also observed in normal controls and patients with Cushing's syndrome. A variety of drugs can modify serum DEX levels and thereby after the effectiveness of DEX in suppressing serum cortisol levels. Simultaneous measurement of serum DEX and cortisol levels appears to be necessary for the appropriate evaluation of DST results. This procedure may help explain many of the inconsistencies in recent DST research.