Afferent projections in the hypoglossal nerve to the facial neurons of the cat

The morphology of the hypoglossal dorsal root and its ganglia in Holstein cattle

This study was carried out to describe morphologically and morphometrically the hypoglossal dorsal root and its ganglia, using heads of 20 adult Holstein cattle of both sexes. The dorsal root of the hypoglossal nerve (XII) has always an evident dorsal root ganglion (DRG) including the accessory in 30% (6 of heads) or satellite ganglia in 10% (2 of heads). There were statistically significant differences between the lengths (right: 8.64+/-0.22 mm, left: 7.91+/-0.31 mm, p<0.01) of peripheral roots of the DRG in male. Statistical significance existed in the lengths (right: 7.01+/-0.43, left: 8.27+/-0.47, p<0.05) of the central roots of the DRG in male. Since the histological findings showed that each ganglion placed on the dorsal root of the XII had the general feature of a spinal ganglion, it can be said that the XII has the intracranial peripheral (sensory) fibers and carry directly sensory input to the brain stem. In conclusion, the present study is the first to reveal the morphology of the hypoglossal dorsal root with ganglia in Holstein cattle.

Hypoglossal afferents to lamina I neurons of the cervical spinal cord projecting to the parabrachial nucleus in the cat

Attempts were made to determine the hypoglossal sensory inputs to the parabrachial nucleus (PBN) through the spinal cord. Wheatgerm agglutinin conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (WGA:HRP) was injected into the cat hypoglossal nerve. HRP-labeled fibers, predominantly derived from the glossopharyngeal and vagal nerves, were observed to terminate in lamina I of the upper cervical spinal cord. A few fibers were also distributed to laminae IV-V and VII-VIII ipsilaterally. WGA:HRP injection into the lateral portion of the PBN also resulted in retrograde labeling in lamina I with ipsilateral predominance. Light-microscopic data raised the possibility of a relay of hypoglossal sensory information to the PBN in lamina I of the cervical spinal cord. In order to confirm the spinal relay, electron-microscopic observations were carried out on lamina I of C1 spinal cord after sectioning of the hypoglossal nerve and WGA:HRP injection into the lateral portion of the PBN on the same side in each animal. It was of particular interest that degenerated hypoglossal afferent fibers made synaptic contacts with lamina I neurons, which were retrogradely labeled with HRP.

Afferent fibers in the hypoglossal nerve: a horseradish peroxidase study in the cat

The existence of afferent fibers in the cat hypoglossal nerve was studied by transganglionic transport of horseradish peroxidase (HRP). Injections of wheat germ agglutinin-conjugated HRP (WGA-HRP) into the hypoglossal nerve resulted in some retrograde labeling of cell bodies within the superior ganglia of the ipsilateral glossopharyngeal and vagal nerves. A few labeled cell bodies were also present ipsilaterally within the inferior ganglion of the vagal nerve and the spinal ganglion of the C1 segment. Some of the labeled glossopharyngeal and vagal fibers reached the nucleus of the solitary tract by crossing the dorsal portion of the spinal trigeminal tract. Others distributed to the spinal trigeminal nucleus pars interpolaris and to the ventrolateral part of the medial cuneate nucleus by descending through the dorsal portion of the spinal trigeminal tract. In the spinal cord these descending fibers, intermingling with labeled dorsal root fibers, distributed to laminae I, IV-V and VII-VIII of the C1 and C2 segments. Additional HRP experiments revealed that the fibers in laminae VII-VIII originate mainly from dorsal root of the C1 segment.

The cells of origin of the hypoglossal afferent nerves and central projections in the cat

The cells of origin for the hypoglossal afferent nerves of the cat and their central projections were examined using the transganglionic and somatopetal transport of horseradish peroxidase (HRP). Primary afferent neurons from the hypoglossal nerve were located in the trigeminal ganglion, the superior ganglion of glossopharyngeal and vagal nerves, and the first 3 cervical ganglia. The central projections of hypoglossal afferents were organized in a selective manner according to their cells of origin. The primary afferent nerves originating from the trigeminal ganglion terminated in the subnucleus dorsalis (Vpd) of the principal nucleus (Vp), lateral margin of the caudal pars interpolaris (Vi), interstitial nucleus and laminae I and V of the pars caudalis (Vc). The projection of the afferent nerves for glossopharyngeal and vagal origins are similarly organized in the Vi and Vc to those of trigeminal origin, but differed in that they terminated ipsilaterally in the caudal half of the solitary nucleus and bilaterally in the commissural nucleus. The primary afferents arising from the first 3 cervical ganglia terminated in laminae I and V of the corresponding cervical cord segments.

Reflex effects evoked by stimulation of hypoglossal afferent fibers

In pentobarbitone-anesthetized cats, electrical stimulation of the central ends of the main trunks of transected hypoglossal nerves evoked vascular (pressor or depressor) reactions, mydriasis, slow and deep breathing, and reflex activation of laryngeal and facial muscles. Stimulation of the central end of the transected ramus descendens hypoglossi also provoked reflex contraction of cricothyroideus. These reflexes may be elicited also after intracranial section of hypoglossal nerve roots, but not after intracranial section of ipsilateral vagal roots. The above reflexes were abolished by acute section of the ipsilateral hypoglossonodosal branch, but they may be reproduced by electrical stimulation of the central end of this anastomotic branch between hypoglossal nerve and nodose ganglion. Stimulation of the central end of one transected hypoglossus evoked reflex efferent discharges in contralateral hypoglossus and contraction of contralateral tongue muscles. Stimulation of the central end of one transected hypoglossal end-branch inhibited efferent discharges in another end-branch. The crossed hypoglossohypoglossal reflex and the ipsilateral reflex inhibition were abolished by section of the hypoglossonodosal branch or vagal roots at the stimulated side. We conclude that reflexes evoked by stimulation of peripheral hypoglossal nerve in cats are mediated by afferent fibers directed to the nodose ganglion and entering the brain stem via vagal roots.

Afferent and efferent components of the hypoglossal nerve in the grass frog, Rana pipiens

In amphibians, the spinomedullary region of the central nervous system is compressed rostrocaudally because of the absence of a neck. In Ranid frogs, the hypoglossal nerve emerges as the ventral ramus of the second spinal nerve. The first spinal nerve, though present in tadpoles, is absent as a separate nerve in adults. To investigate the central nervous system components of the hypoglossal nerve in Rana pipiens, we soaked identified, transected branches of this nerve in horseradish peroxidase, a retrograde and anterograde tracer. We found that the hypoglossal nerve in these frogs originates from two efferent nuclei located in the caudal medulla, a medial and a lateral one. Afferent fibers, primarily from the tongue, are also found in the hypoglossal nerve and travel in the dorsolateral funiculus of the spinal cord, descending to thoracic levels of the cord. Efferents to intrinsic tongue muscles and the genioglossus muscle originate in the medial medullary nucleus. Efferents to the sternohyoid muscle, which travel through the hypoglossal nerve, originate in the lateral medullary nucleus. Since in mammals the sternohyoid muscle is innervated by the first spinal nerve, we have obtained experimental evidence that the hypoglossal nerve in Rana pipiens contains components of this spinal nerve.

Afferent neurons in the hypoglossal nerve of the zebra finch (Poephila guttata): localization with horseradish peroxidase

Hypoglossal efferent fibers are known to innervate the vocal organ (syrinx) in songbirds. In order to determine the existence of afferent fibers from the syrinx in the zebra finch, horseradish peroxidase (HRP) was applied to the cut peripheral branch of the hypoglossal nerve that innervates the left side of the syrinx. Cell bodies in the ganglion of the left vagus nerve were labeled, but no transganglionic (anterograde) transport into the CNS was observed at transport intervals of 1 to 5 days. (In comparison applying HRP to the cut descending branch of the vagus produced labeled cell bodies in the vagal ganglion as well as heavy anterograde label extending into the solitary nucleus.) Injection of HRP conjugated to wheat germ agglutinin into the intrinsic syringeal muscles also labeled cell bodies in the vagal ganglion, and again no transganglionic label was observed. Application of HRP more proximally to the cut hypoglossal truck resulted in the appearance of labeled cell bodies in the vagal ganglion as well as the anterograde label extending from the descending trigeminal tract to the principal sensory nucleus of V. These results indicate that hypoglossal afferents have cell bodies in the vagal ganglion, enter the medulla dorsally with vagal fibers, and terminate in the trigeminal complex. The identification of these afferent fibers raises the important question of their role in vocal learning.

An enzyme tracer study of the organization of the somatic motor center for the innervation of different muscles of the tongue: evidence for two sources

The hypoglossal nucleus has been described as the sole ipsilateral source of somatic motor innervation of the lingual and geniohyoideus muscles (Streeter, '40; Barnard, '40; Crosby et al., '62; Watkins, '78; Jenkins, '78). In this study microliter amounts of 30% solution of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) were injected into intact but surgically isolated canine genioglossus, hyoglossus, styloglossus, geniohyoideus, and intrinsic lingual muscles. All injections were confined to the left half of the tongue, and the right half served as control. The HRP injections resulted in ipsilateral labeling of hypoglossal neurons with the exception of the injections into the genioglossus muscle, which labeled this nucleus bilaterally. Surprisingly, a few neurons associated with the ventromedial aspect of the caudal pole of the ipsilateral facial motor nucleus also labeled after injections of lingual muscles. The somatotopic representation of the geniohyoideus and lingual muscles within the hypoglossal nucleus suggested that those muscles known to originate from the same or related primodia labeled in the same or closely related hypoglossal subnuclei. The presence of labeled neurons associated with facial motor nucleus supported the hypothesis (Langman, '75) of a possible dual origin of lingual muscles.

Synaptic actions of vagal afferents on facial motoneurons in the cat

Synaptic potentials in facial motoneurons of cats were intracellularly recorded on stimulation of the vagal nerve, superior laryngeal nerve, solitary tract nucleus and spinal trigeminal tract nucleus. A possible disynaptic excitation was elicited in the facial motoneurons by stimulation of the vagal nerves and superior laryngeal nerves on both sides. Activation of the neurons in the solitary tract nucleus and/or trigeminal tract nucleus induced monosynaptic excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) in the facial motoneurons.

The origins of the afferent fibers to the lingual muscles of the dog, a retrograde labelling study with horseradish peroxidase

The origin of the afferent fibers to the lingual muscles of the dog was investigated by means of retrograde transport of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) from injection sites in the tongue and the extrinsic lingual muscles. Intralingual injections were not satisfactory because the enzyme diffused beyond the intrinsic lingual muscles to include virtually all tissues within the tongue. Thus, the resultant retrograde labeling of cell bodies of the trigeminal, geniculate, glossopharyngeal, vagal, and first cervical (C1) spinal ganglia represented a composite of lingual sensory innervation. In order to confine HRP uptake to intramuscular nerve endings, injections were limited to surgically isolated extrinsic lingual muscles, i.e., the genioglossus, hyoglossus, and styloglossus. After these intramuscular injections, labeled neurons appeared ipsilaterally in the C1 spinal ganglion, the proximal vagal (jugular) ganglion, and trigeminal ganglion. Earlier suggestions that the lingual proprioceptive neurons of the dog reside in the distal vagal (nodose) ganglion and hypoglossal ganglia were not confirmed. The mesencephalic nucleus of the trigeminal nerve failed to label after enzyme injections into the tongue or the extrinsic lingual muscles. The retrograde labeling of cell bodies in the C1 spinal ganglion was abolished when HRP injections into the extrinsic lingual muscles were preceded by surgical interruption of the ansa cervicalis or distal section of the hypoglossal nerve. Retrograde labeling of neurons in the proximal vagal ganglion persisted after hypoglossal nerve transections.

Afferent neurons of the hypoglossal nerve of the rat as demonstrated by horseradish peroxidase tracing

Cell bodies of sensory neurons of the rat's hypoglossal nerve were demonstrated by the somatopetal horseradish peroxidase (HRP) transport technique. Labelled perikarya were found within the second and third cervical spinal ganglia and in the vagal sensory ganglia. After application of HRP to the cut peripheral trunk of the hypoglossal nerve about 200 labelled cell bodies were counted in each animal. The vast majority of the axons from cervical spinal ganglion cells reach the hypoglossal nerve via the descending ramus (N. descendens hypoglossi). However, there may exist an additional pathway, probably via the cervical sympathetic trunk. Application of HPR to the medial and lateral end branches led to a labelling of much fewer spinal ganglion cells while the number of labelled vegal sensory neurons remained unchanged. Thus, it is suggested that the majority of the cervical afferents of the hypoglossal nerve originates within the extrinsic tongue musculature and the geniohyoid muscle, whereas the vagal afferents may perhaps derive exclusively from the intrinsic muslces. Histograms of the mean diameters of labelled cell bodies show a predominance of very small perikarya. This contrasts with the diameter distribution of sensory perikarya labelled after HRP application to nerves supplying other skeletal muscles. It is therefore assumed that the afferent component of the hypoglossal nerve is composed mainly of small-calibre axons.