Alterations of adenosine A1 receptors in morphine dependence

Opioid-induced structural and functional plasticity of medium-spiny neurons in the nucleus accumbens

Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) is a chronic relapsing clinical condition with tremendous morbidity and mortality that frequently persists, despite treatment, due to an individual's underlying psychological, neurobiological, and genetic vulnerabilities. Evidence suggests that these vulnerabilities may have neurochemical, cellular, and molecular bases. Key neuroplastic events within the mesocorticolimbic system that emerge through chronic exposure to opioids may have a determinative influence on behavioral symptoms associated with OUD. In particular, structural and functional alterations in the dendritic spines of medium spiny neurons (MSNs) within the nucleus accumbens (NAc) and its dopaminergic projections from the ventral tegmental area (VTA) are believed to facilitate these behavioral sequelae. Additionally, glutamatergic neurons from the prefrontal cortex, the basolateral amygdala, the hippocampus, and the thalamus project to these same MSNs, providing an enriched target for synaptic plasticity. Here, we review literature related to neuroadaptations in NAc MSNs from dopaminergic and glutamatergic pathways in OUD. We also describe new findings related to transcriptional, epigenetic, and molecular mechanisms in MSN plasticity in the different stages of OUD.

Adenosine A2AReceptors in Substance Use Disorders: A Focus on Cocaine

Several psychoactive drugs can evoke substance use disorders (SUD) in humans and animals, and these include psychostimulants, opioids, cannabinoids (CB), nicotine, and alcohol. The etiology, mechanistic processes, and the therapeutic options to deal with SUD are not well understood. The common feature of all abused drugs is that they increase dopamine (DA) neurotransmission within the mesocorticolimbic circuitry of the brain followed by the activation of DA receptors. D₂ receptors were proposed as important molecular targets for SUD. The findings showed that D₂ receptors formed heteromeric complexes with other GPCRs, which forced the addiction research area in new directions. In this review, we updated the view on the brain D₂ receptor complexes with adenosine (A)2A receptors (A_2AR) and discussed the role of A_2AR in different aspects of addiction phenotypes in laboratory animal procedures that permit the highly complex syndrome of human drug addiction. We presented the current knowledge on the neurochemical in vivo and ex vivo mechanisms related to cocaine use disorder (CUD) and discussed future research directions for A_2AR heteromeric complexes in SUD.

The adenosine, adrenergic and opioid pathways in the regulation of insulin secretion, beta cell proliferation and regeneration

Insulin, a key hormone produced by pancreatic beta cells precisely regulates glucose metabolism in vertebrates. In type 1 diabetes, the beta cell mass is destroyed, a process triggered by a combination of environmental and genetic factors. This ultimately results in absolute insulin deficiency and dysregulated glucose metabolism resulting in a number of detrimental pathophysiological effects. The traditional focus of treating type 1 diabetes has been to control blood sugar levels through the administration of exogenous insulin. Newer approaches aim to replace the beta cell mass through pancreatic or islet transplantation. Type 2 diabetes results from a relative insulin deficiency for the prevailing insulin resistance. Treatments are generally aimed at reducing insulin resistance and/or augmenting insulin secretion and the use of insulin itself is often required. It is increasingly being recognized that the beta cell mass is dynamic and increases insulin secretion in response to beta cell mitogens and stress signals to maintain glycemia within a very narrow physiological range. This review critically discusses the role of adrenergic, adenosine and opioid pathways and their interrelationship in insulin secretion, beta cell proliferation and regeneration.

Remifentanil-induced preconditioning has cross-talk with A1 and A2B adenosine receptors in ischemic-reperfused rat heart

The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is a cross-talk between opioid receptors (OPRs) and adenosine receptors (ADRs) in remifentanil preconditioning (R-Pre) and, if so, to investigate the types of ADRs involved in the cross-talk. Isolated rat hearts received 30 min of regional ischemia followed by 2 hr of reperfusion. OPR and ADR antagonists were perfused from 10 min before R-Pre until the end of R-Pre. The heart rate, left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP),velocity of contraction (+dP/dtmax), and coronary flow (CF) were recorded. The area at risk and area of necrosis were measured. After reperfusion, the LVDP, +dP/dtmax,and CF showed a significant increase in the R-Pre group compared with the control group (no intervention before or after regional ischemia). These increases in the R-Pre group were blocked by naloxone, a nonspecific ADR antagonist, an A1 ADR antagonist, and an A2B ADR antagonist. The infarct size was reduced significantly in the R-Pre group compared with the control group. The infarct-reducing effect in the R-Pre group was blocked by naloxone, the nonspecific ADR antagonist, the A1 ADR antagonist, and the A2B ADR antagonist. The results of this study demonstrate that there is cross-talk between ADRs and OPRs in R-Pre and that A1 ADR and A2B ADR appear to be involved in the cross-talk.

The adenosinergic system is involved in sensitization to morphine withdrawal signs in rats-neurochemical and molecular basis in dopaminergic system

RATIONALE

Experimental data informs that not only do the dose and time duration of dependent drugs affect the severity of withdrawal episodes. Previous withdrawal experiences may intensify this process, which is referred as sensitization to withdrawal signs. Adenosine and dopamine (DA) receptors may be involved in this sensitization.

OBJECTIVES

Rats were continuously and sporadically treated with increasing doses of morphine for 8 days. In rats, sporadically treated with morphine, morphine administration was modified by adding three morphine-free periods. Adenosine agonists were given during each of the morphine-free periods (six injections in total). On the 9th day, morphine was injected. One hour later, naloxone was administered to induce morphine withdrawal signs. Then, the animals were placed into cylinders and the number of jumpings was recorded. Next, the rats were decapitated and brain and brain structures (striatum, hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex) were dissected for neurochemical, molecular, and immunohistochemical experiments within DAergic pathways.

RESULTS

We demonstrated that previous experiences of opioid withdrawal intensified subsequent withdrawal signs. Adenosine ligands attenuated the sensitization to withdrawal signs. In a neurochemical study, the release of DA and its metabolites was impaired in all structures. Significant alterations were also observed in mRNA and protein expression of DA receptors.

CONCLUSIONS

Results demonstrate that intermittent treatment with morphine induces alterations in the DAergic system which may be responsible for sensitization to morphine withdrawal signs. Although adenosine ligands attenuate this type of sensitization, they are not able to fully restore the physiological brain status.

Effects of the adenosinergic system on the expression and acquisition of sensitization to conditioned place preference in morphine-conditioned rats

In the presented study, we attempt to investigate if the sensitization to conditioned place preference (CPP) induced by low doses of morphine was developed in rats which have been previously conditioned with morphine. The experiments were performed in the CPP test. Firstly, it has been demonstrated that administration of ineffective dose of morphine on the 9th day induces the increase in time spent of rats at a morphine-paired compartment, confirming that sensitization to CPP has been developed in these animals. Secondly, it has been shown that stimulation of A1 receptor significantly inhibits the expression of morphine-induced of sensitization, and blockade of these receptors produces the opposite effect. Finally, it has been indicated that both stimulation and blockade of A1 and/or A2A receptors inhibit the acquisition of sensitization to CPP. The obtained results have strongly supported the significance of adenosinergic system in both expression and acquisition of studied sensitization. These results seem to be important for the identification of connections in the central nervous system which can help finding new strategies to attenuate rewarding action of morphine.

Opiate-induced changes in brain adenosine levels and narcotic drug responses

We have very little information about the metabolomic changes that mediate neurobehavioral responses, including addiction. It was possible that opioid-induced metabolomic changes in brain could mediate some of the pharmacodynamic effects of opioids. To investigate this, opiate-induced brain metabolomic responses were profiled using a semi-targeted method in C57BL/6 and 129Sv1 mice, which exhibit extreme differences in their tendency to become opiate dependent. Escalating morphine doses (10-40 mg/kg) administered over a 4-day period selectively induced a twofold decrease (p<0.00005) in adenosine abundance in the brainstem of C57BL/6 mice, which exhibited symptoms of narcotic drug dependence; but did not decrease adenosine abundance in 129Sv1 mice, which do not exhibit symptoms of dependence. Based on this finding, the effect of adenosine on dependence was investigated in genetically engineered mice with alterations in adenosine tone in the brain and in pharmacologic experiments. Morphine withdrawal behaviors were significantly diminished (p<0.0004) in genetically engineered mice with reduced adenosine tone in the brainstem, and by treatment with an adenosine receptor(1) (A(1)) agonist (2-chloro-N6-cyclopentyladenosine, 0.5mg/kg) or an A(2a) receptor (A(2a)) antagonist (SCH 58261, 1mg/kg). These results indicate that adenosine homeostasis plays a crucial role in narcotic drug responses. Opiate-induced changes in brain adenosine levels may explain many important neurobehavioral features associated with opiate addiction and withdrawal.

Adenosinergic system: an assorted approach to therapeutics for drug addiction

Adenosine is an endogenous purine nucleoside and it is extensively present in the brain. It exerts several metabolic and neuromodulatory roles in the body. Adenosine also acts as an important messenger molecule for extracellular signaling and shows a homeostatic neuromodulatory function at the synaptic level. Extracellular adenosine exerts a wide variety of biological actions through four cell surface G-protein-coupled receptor subtypes, namely A1, A2A, A2B and A3 adenosine receptors. The extracellular levels of adenosine have been found to be enhanced in several neuropathological conditions, including drug addiction, and thus a neuroprotective role of adenosine was perceived by various experimental studies. The aversive withdrawal symptoms emanating from drug discontinuation provokes rebound drug intake patterns. In addition, alteration of neurotransmitter(s) release and changes in receptor expression contribute to the behavioral changes of drug withdrawal. Furthermore, the abuse of major drugs such as alcohol and opioids are reported to modulate extracellular adenosine levels. In this context, the neuromodulatory functions of adenosine would be valuable if projected to the clinical applications and thus, an increasing attention is currently given to the functional role of adenosine in human addictive disorders. This review will focus on recent clinical and experimental studies that reveal the actions of adenosine and related ligands in drug addiction and various drug-withdrawal syndromes. The evidence and reports provided in this review highlight the looming therapeutic potential of purinergic drugs, with a hope that new therapeutic interventions based on the adenosinergic concept will emerge in the coming years for the management of drug withdrawal syndrome.

Adenosine receptors and the central nervous system

The adenosine receptors (ARs) in the nervous system act as a kind of "go-between" to regulate the release of neurotransmitters (this includes all known neurotransmitters) and the action of neuromodulators (e.g., neuropeptides, neurotrophic factors). Receptor-receptor interactions and AR-transporter interplay occur as part of the adenosine's attempt to control synaptic transmission. A(2A)ARs are more abundant in the striatum and A(1)ARs in the hippocampus, but both receptors interfere with the efficiency and plasticity-regulated synaptic transmission in most brain areas. The omnipresence of adenosine and A(2A) and A(1) ARs in all nervous system cells (neurons and glia), together with the intensive release of adenosine following insults, makes adenosine a kind of "maestro" of the tripartite synapse in the homeostatic coordination of the brain function. Under physiological conditions, both A(2A) and A(1) ARs play an important role in sleep and arousal, cognition, memory and learning, whereas under pathological conditions (e.g., Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, stroke, epilepsy, drug addiction, pain, schizophrenia, depression), ARs operate a time/circumstance window where in some circumstances A(1)AR agonists may predominate as early neuroprotectors, and in other circumstances A(2A)AR antagonists may alter the outcomes of some of the pathological deficiencies. In some circumstances, and depending on the therapeutic window, the use of A(2A)AR agonists may be initially beneficial; however, at later time points, the use of A(2A)AR antagonists proved beneficial in several pathologies. Since selective ligands for A(1) and A(2A) ARs are now entering clinical trials, the time has come to determine the role of these receptors in neurological and psychiatric diseases and identify therapies that will alter the outcomes of these diseases, therefore providing a hopeful future for the patients who suffer from these diseases.

Adenosine receptor agonists attenuate the development of diazepam withdrawal-induced sensitization in mice

In the present study, the effects of adenosine agonists on the development of sensitization to withdrawal signs precipitated after sporadic treatment with diazepam, in mice, were investigated. To obtain the sensitization, the animals were divided into groups: continuously and sporadically treated with diazepam (15.0 mg/kg, s.c.). The adenosine receptor agonists (CPA, CGS 21,680 and NECA) were administered in sporadically diazepam treated mice during two diazepam-free periods. Concomitant administration of pentetrazole (55.0 mg/kg, s.c.) with flumazenil (5.0 mg/kg, i.p.) after the last injection of diazepam or vehicle, induced the withdrawal signs, such as clonic seizures, tonic convulsion and death episodes. The major finding of our experiments is attenuation of withdrawal signs in sensitized mice, inducing by all adenosine agonists. Only higher dose of CPA produced significantly decreased the number of withdrawal incidents, while both used doses of CGS 21,680 and NECA produced more clear effects. These results support the hypothesis that adenosinergic system is involved in the mechanisms of sensitization to the benzodiazepine withdrawal signs, and adenosine A(2A) receptors play more important role in that process.

Adenosine A2A receptors in ventral striatum, hypothalamus and nociceptive circuitry implications for drug addiction, sleep and pain

Adenosine A2A receptors localized in the dorsal striatum are considered as a new target for the development of antiparkinsonian drugs. Co-administration of A2A receptor antagonists has shown a significant improvement of the effects of l-DOPA. The present review emphasizes the possible application of A2A receptor antagonists in pathological conditions other than parkinsonism, including drug addiction, sleep disorders and pain. In addition to the dorsal striatum, the ventral striatum (nucleus accumbens) contains a high density of A2A receptors, which presynaptically and postsynaptically regulate glutamatergic transmission in the cortical glutamatergic projections to the nucleus accumbens. It is currently believed that molecular adaptations of the cortico-accumbens glutamatergic synapses are involved in compulsive drug seeking and relapse. Here we review recent experimental evidence suggesting that A2A antagonists could become new therapeutic agents for drug addiction. Morphological and functional studies have identified lower levels of A2A receptors in brain areas other than the striatum, such as the ventrolateral preoptic area of the hypothalamus, where adenosine plays an important role in sleep regulation. Although initially believed to be mostly dependent on A1 receptors, here we review recent studies that demonstrate that the somnogenic effects of adenosine are largely mediated by hypothalamic A2A receptors. A2A)receptor antagonists could therefore be considered as a possible treatment for narcolepsy and other sleep-related disorders. Finally, nociception is another adenosine-regulated neural function previously thought to mostly involve A1 receptors. Although there is some conflicting literature on the effects of agonists and antagonists, which may partly be due to the lack of selectivity of available drugs, the studies in A2A receptor knockout mice suggest that A2A receptor antagonists might have some therapeutic potential in pain states, in particular where high intensity stimuli are prevalent.

Pharmacological evidence for the involvement of the opioid system in the antidepressant-like effect of adenosine in the mouse forced swimming test

This study investigated the involvement of the opioid system in the antidepressant-like effect of adenosine in the forced swimming test. The effect of adenosine (10 mg/kg, i.p.) was prevented by the pretreatment of mice with naloxone (1 mg/kg, i.p., a nonselective opioid receptor antagonist), naltrindole (3 mg/kg, i.p., a selective delta-opioid receptor antagonist), clocinnamox (1 mg/kg, i.p., an irreversible mu-opioid receptor antagonist), and 2-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-Nmethyl-N-[(1S)-1-(3-isothiocyanatophenyl)-2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)ethyl]acetamide (DIPPA; 1 mg/kg, i.p., a selective kappa-opioid receptor antagonist), but not with naloxone methiodide (1 mg/kg, s.c., a nonselective opioid receptor antagonist that does not cross the blood-brain barrier). Naloxone also prevented the anti-immobility effect of cyclohexyladenosine (CHA, 0.1 mg/kg, i.p., a selective adenosine A(1) receptor agonist) and N6-[2-(3,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-2-(2-methylphenyl)ethyl]adenosine (DPMA, 1 mg/kg, i.p., a selective adenosine A(2A) receptor agonist). The administration of DIPPA (0.1 mg/kg, i.p.) or morphine (1 mg/kg, s.c., a nonselective opioid receptor agonist), but not naltrindole (0.3 mg/kg, i.p.) and clocinnamox (0.1 mg/kg, i.p.) potentiated the effect of a subeffective dose of adenosine (1 mg/kg, i.p.) in the forced swimming test, without affecting the locomotor activity. No additive effect in the immobility time was observed when mice were treated with morphine (5 mg/kg, s.c.) plus adenosine (10 mg/kg, i.p.). These results indicate that the anti-immobility effect of adenosine in the forced swimming test, via adenosine A(1) and A(2A) receptors, is mediated by an interaction with the opioid system, likely dependent on an activation of mu- and delta-opioid receptors and an inhibition of kappa-opioid receptors.

Interaction of adenosine and naloxone on regional cerebral blood flow in morphine-dependent rats

The present research aimed at investigating the opioid-adenosine interaction on regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF). Therefore rCBF in the sensory cortex of morphine-naive and -dependent rats was measured using the laser-Doppler flowmetry technique. The results showed that adenosine (10(-5), 10(-4), 10(-3) M) significantly increased rCBF in morphine-dependent rats (MDR) (P < 0.01). This effect was inhibited by theophylline (5 x 10(-5) M). Also systemic naloxone (0.5, 1.5 and 3 mg/kg, s.c.) significantly increased rCBF in MDR and it was accompanied by elevated blood pressure and heart rate. Local adenosine (10(-4) M) significantly augmented naloxone (0.5 mg/kg)-induced increase in rCBF of MDR but had no significant effect on naloxone's (1.5 and 3 mg/kg) increasing effect on rCBF. Theophylline also has no effect on naloxone increasing effect on rCBF. These data suggest that adenosine receptors responsiveness increase in sensory cortex of MDR. Naloxone also highly increased rCBF of MDR that probably not interfere with adenosine receptors. Also, it seems that adenosine acts as a modulator in rCBF regulation of morphine-dependent and morphine withdrawal rats.

Absence of quasi-morphine withdrawal syndrome in adenosine A2A receptor knockout mice

RATIONALE

Caffeine and other methylxanthines induce behavioral activation and anxiety responses in mice via antagonist action at A2A adenosine receptors. When combined with the opioid antagonist naloxone, methylxanthines produce a characteristic quasi-morphine withdrawal syndrome (QMWS) in opiate-naive animals.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to establish the role of A2A receptors in the quasi-morphine withdrawal syndrome induced by co-administration of caffeine and naloxone and in the behavioral effects of caffeine.

METHODS

We have used A2A receptor knockout (A(2A)R(-/-)) mice in comparison with their wild-type and heterozygous littermates to measure locomotor activity in the open field and withdrawal symptoms induced by caffeine and naloxone. Naïve wild-type and knockout mice were also examined for enkephalin and dynorphin mRNA expression by in situ hybridization and for mu-opiate receptor by ligand binding autoradiography to check for possible opiate receptor changes induced by A2A receptor inactivation.

RESULTS

Caffeine increases locomotion and anxiety in wild-type animals, but it has no psychomotor effects in A(2A)R(-/-) mice. Co-administration of caffeine (20 mg/kg) and naloxone (2 mg/kg) resulted in a severe quasi-morphine withdrawal syndrome in wild-type mice that was almost completely abolished in A(2A)R(-/-) mice. Heterozygous animals exhibited a 40% reduction in withdrawal symptoms, suggesting that there is no genetic/developmental compensation for the inactivation of one of the A(2A)R alleles. A(2A)R(-/-) and wild-type mice have similar levels of striatal mu-opioid receptors, thus the effect is not due to altered opioid receptor expression.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that A2A receptors are required for the induction of quasi-morphine withdrawal syndrome by co-administration of caffeine and naloxone and implicate striatal A2A receptors and mu-opiate receptors in tonic inhibition of motor activity in the striatum.

Influence of adenosine receptor agonists on benzodiazepine withdrawal signs in mice

The involvement of adenosine receptor agonists in benzodiazepine withdrawal signs was evaluated as the seizure susceptibility of mice. The concomitant administration of subthreshold dose of pentetrazole (55.0 or 60.0 mg/kg, s.c.) with flumazenil (10.0 mg/kg, i.p.) in mice chronically treated with temazepam or diazepam induced the appearance of withdrawal signs: clonic seizures, tonic convulsions and death episodes. The administration of the selective A1 (CPA-N6-cyclopentyladenosine), A2A (CGS 21680-2-p-(2-carboxyethyl)phenethylamino-5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine hydrochloride) and the non-selective A1/A2A (NECA-5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine) adenosine receptor agonists (i.p.) evoked the significant attenuation of benzodiazepine withdrawal signs, and these effects were more expressed in temazepam- than in diazepam-dependent mice. CPA has shown the most apparent and dose-dependent attenuating effect. The results confirm that adenosine A1 and A2A receptors are involved in benzodiazepine withdrawal signs, and adenosine A1 receptor plays a predominant role in this phenomenon.

Opioid-induced preconditioning: recent advances and future perspectives

Opioids, named by Acheson for compounds with morphine-like actions despite chemically distinct structures, have received much research interest, particularly for their central nervous system (CNS) actions involved in pain management, resulting in thousands of scientific papers focusing on their effects on the CNS and other organ systems. A more recent area which may have great clinical importance concerns the role of opioids, either endogenous or exogenous compounds, in limiting the pathogenesis of ischemia-reperfusion injury in heart and brain. The role of endogenous opioids in hibernation provides tantalizing evidence for the protective potential of opioids against ischemia or hypoxia. Mammalian hibernation, a distinct energy-conserving state, is associated with depletion of energy stores, intracellular acidosis and hypoxia, similar to those which occur during ischemia. However, despite the potentially detrimental cellular state induced with hibernation, the myocardium remains resilient for many months. What accounts for the hypoxia-tolerant state is of great interest. During hibernation, circulating levels of opioid peptides are increased dramatically, and indeed, are considered a "trigger" of hibernation. Furthermore, administration of opioid antagonists can effectively reverse hibernation in mammals. Therefore, it is not surprising that activation of opioid receptors has been demonstrated to preserve cellular status following a hypoxic insult, such as ischemia-reperfusion in many model systems including the intestine [Zhang, Y., Wu, Y.X., Hao, Y.B., Dun, Y. Yang, S.P., 2001. Role of endogenous opioid peptides in protection of ischemic preconditioning in rat small intestine. Life Sci. 68, 1013-1019], skeletal muscle [Addison, P.D., Neligan, P.C., Ashrafpour, H., Khan, A., Zhong, A., Moses, M., Forrest, C.R., Pang, C.Y., 2003. Noninvasive remote ischemic preconditioning for global protection of skeletal muscle against infarction. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 285, H1435-H1443], the CNS [Borlongan, C.V., Wang, Y., Su, T.P., 2005. Delta opioid peptide (d-ala 2, d-leu 5) enkephalin: linking hiberation and neuroprotection. Front Biosci. 9, 3392-3398] and the myocardium [Romano, M.A., Seymour, E.M., Berry, J.A., McNish, R.A., Bolling, S.F., 2004. Relative contribution of endogenous opioids to myocardial ischemic tolerance. J Surg Res. 118, 32-37; Peart, J.N., Gross, G.J., 2004a. Exogenous activation of delta- and kappa-opioid receptors affords cardioprotection in isolated murine heart. Basic Res Cardiol. 99(1), 29-37]. For the purpose of this review, we will focus primarily on the protective effects of opioids against post-reperfusion myocardial stunning and infarction.

Quantitative autoradiography of adenosine receptors and NBTI-sensitive adenosine transporters in the brains of mice deficient in the preproenkephalin gene

There is a large body of evidence indicating important interactions between the adenosine and the opioid systems in regulating pain, opioid dependence and withdrawal. Mice lacking the proenkephalin gene and therefore lacking the endogenous enkephalin peptides have been successfully developed and exhibit decreased locomotor activity, are hyperalgesic and show enhanced anxiety and aggression. In addition, an upregulation of mu and delta receptors was also observed in the brains of knockout mice. To investigate if there are any compensatory alterations in adenosine systems in the brains of mutant mice, we have carried out quantitative autoradiographic mapping of A(1) and A(2A) adenosine receptors and nitrobenzylthioinosine (NBTI)-sensitive adenosine transporters in the brains of wild-type and homozygous enkephalin knockout mice. Adjacent coronal brain sections were cut from brains of +/+ and -/- mice for the determination of binding of [(3)H]1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine ([(3)H]DPCPX), [(3)H]2-[p-(2-carbonylethyl)phenylethylamino]-5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine ([(3)H]CGS21680) or [(3)H]NBTI to A(1) and A(2A) adenosine receptors and NBTI-sensitive adenosine transporters, respectively. A small but significant increase in [(3)H]DPCPX and [(3)H]NBTI binding but no significant change in [(3)H]CGS21680 binding was detected in enkephalin knockout brains. The results provide further evidence of functional interactions in the brain between opioid receptors and A(1) adenosine receptors as well as NBTI-sensitive adenosine transporters but not A(2A) receptors.

Chronic exposure to morphine produces a marked cardioprotective phenotype in aged mouse hearts

Aging is often associated with decreased myocardial ischemic tolerance. We recently reported that chronic preconditioning produced by continuous exposure to morphine affords a profound cardioprotective phenotype in young mice. In this study, we determined if chronic exposure to morphine retained its ability to precondition the myocardium in the young or aged heart. Young (10-14 weeks) or aged (24-26 months) C57/BL6 mice were untreated, administered morphine acutely (30 microM), or implanted with a morphine pellet (75 mg) for 5 days prior to heart isolation and perfusion. Following equilibration, perfused hearts were subjected to 25 min ischemia and 45 min reperfusion. Untreated hearts from both young and aged mice displayed marked contractile dysfunction and LDH release following reperfusion. Acute infusion of morphine improved recovery of end-diastolic pressure and developed pressure in young (P < 0.05 vs. untreated) but not senescent hearts. Hearts from mice exposed to morphine for 5 days displayed a further improvement in post-ischemic contractile function (P < 0.05 vs. acute treatment), and a marked reduction in post-ischemic LDH efflux (P < 0.05 vs. untreated) in both young and senescent hearts. These data demonstrate that aged hearts maintain the ability to be preconditioned by chronic exposure to morphine in the absence of acute protection.

Enhanced morphine withdrawal and micro -opioid receptor G-protein coupling in A2A adenosine receptor knockout mice

Much evidence supports the hypothesis that A2A adenosine receptors play an important role in the expression of morphine withdrawal and that the dopaminergic system might also be involved. We have evaluated morphine withdrawal signs in wild-type and A2A receptor knockout mice and shown a significant enhancement in some withdrawal signs in the knockout mice. In addition, micro -opioid and dopamine D2 receptor autoradiography, as well as micro -opioid receptor-stimulated guanylyl 5'-[gamma-[35S]thio]-triphosphate ([35S]GTPgammaS) autoradiography was carried out in brain sections of withdrawn wild-type and knockout mice. No significant changes in D2 and micro -opioid receptor binding were observed in any of the brain regions analysed. However, a significant increase in the level of micro receptor-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding was observed in the nucleus accumbens of withdrawn knockout mice. These data indicate that the A2A receptor plays a role in opioid withdrawal related to functional receptor activation.

Adenosine and opioid receptor-mediated cardioprotection in the rat: evidence for cross-talk between receptors

The relative roles of free-radical production, mitochondrial ATP-sensitive K+ (mitoKATP) channels and possible receptor cross-talk in both opioid and adenosine A1 receptor (A1AR) mediated protection were assessed in a rat model of myocardial infarction. Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to 30 min of occlusion and 90 min of reperfusion. The untreated rats exhibited an infarct of 58.8 +/- 2.9% [infarct size (IS)/area at risk (AAR), %] at the end of reperfusion. Pretreatment with either the nonselective opioid receptor agonist morphine or the selective A1AR agonist 2-chloro-cyclopentyladenosine (CCPA) dramatically reduced IS/AAR to 41.1 +/- 2.2% and 37.9 +/- 5.5%, respectively (P < 0.05). Protection afforded by either morphine or CCPA was abolished by the reactive oxygen species scavenger N-(2-mercaptopropionyl)glycine or the mitoKATP channel blocker 5-hydroxydecanoate. Both morphine- and CCPA-mediated protection were attenuated by the selective A1AR antagonist 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine and the selective delta1-opioid receptor (DOR) antagonist 7-benzylidenealtrexone. Simultaneous administration of morphine and CCPA failed to enhance the infarct-sparing effect of either agonist alone. These data suggest that both DOR and A1AR-mediated cardioprotection are mitoKATP and reactive oxygen species dependent. Furthermore, these data suggest that there are converging pathways and/or receptor cross-talk between A1AR- and DOR-mediated cardioprotection.

Quantitative autoradiography of adenosine receptors in brains of chronic naltrexone-treated mice

1. Manipulation of micro opioid receptor expression either by chronic morphine treatment or by deletion of the gene encoding micro opioid receptors leads to changes in adenosine receptor expression. Chronic administration of the opioid receptor antagonist naltrexone leads to upregulation of micro receptor binding in the brain. 2. To investigate if there are any compensatory alterations in adenosine systems in the brains of chronic naltrexone-treated mice, we carried out quantitative autoradiographic mapping of A(1) and A(2A) adenosine receptors in the brains of mice treated for 1 week with naltrexone (8 mg(-1) kg(-1) day(-1)), administered subcutaneously via osmotic minipump. 3. Adjacent coronal brain sections were cut from chronic saline- and naltrexone-treated mice for the determination of binding of [(3)H] D-Ala(2)-MePhe(4)-Gly-ol(5) enkephalin ([(3)H] DAMGO), [(3)H]1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine ([(3)H] DPCPX) or [(3)H] 2-[p-(2-carbonylethyl)phenylethylamino]-5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine ([(3)H] CGS21680) to micro, A(1) and A(2A) receptors, respectively. 4. A significant increase in micro and A(1) receptor binding was detected in chronic naltrexone-treated brains. The changes in micro receptors were significant in several regions, but changes in A(1) were relatively smaller but showed significant upregulation collectively. No significant change in A(2A) receptor binding was detected in chronic naltrexone-treated brains. 5. The results show that blockade of opioid receptors causes upregulation of A(1) receptors, but not A(2A) receptors, by as yet undefined mechanisms.

Effects of a neurosteroid, pregnenolone, during the neonatal period on adenosine A1 receptor, dopamine metabolites in the fronto-parietal cortex and behavioral response in the open field

Neuronal dysfunction in the frontal cortex has been reported in the etiology of mental disorders, including schizophrenia. The adenosine A(1) receptor system, as well as the dopaminergic system, are important in the control of cortical neuronal activity. We hypothesize that neuroexcitability in early life is critical to the normal development of the brain, and neurosteroids are factors that modulate neuroexcitability during the development period. In this study, we treated neonatal rats with a neurosteroid, pregnenolone (10 microg/g) from postnatal day (PD) 3 until PD 7. In pregnenolone-treated male and female rats, adenosine A(1) receptor density, the amount of dopamine (DA), serotonin (5-HT) and their metabolites in the fronto-parietal cortex and behavioral responses in the open field were examined pre- and post-puberty. A decrease in K(d) values for the adenosine A(1) receptor binding assay using [(3)H]1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (DPCPX), increased formation of DA metabolites and hyper-locomotor activity in the open field were found in pregnenolone-treated rats compared with controls in pre- and post-puberty. An increase in 5-HT metabolites was found in the pregnenolone-treated rats in pre-puberty, but not post-puberty. These effects of pregnenolone were not different between males and females. However, correlations between horizontal and vertical activities in the open field were disrupted only in pregnenolone-treated females. The present results indicate that pregnenolone treatment during the neonatal period influences the cortical dopaminergic and adenosinergic systems as well as behavioral responses in the open field.

Changes in spinal delta and kappa opioid systems in mice deficient in the A2A receptor gene

A large body of evidence indicates important interactions between the adenosine and opioid systems in regulating pain at both the spinal and supraspinal level. Mice lacking the A(2A) receptor gene have been developed successfully, and these animals were shown to be hypoalgesic. To investigate whether there are any compensatory alterations in opioid systems in mutant animals, we have performed quantitative autoradiographic mapping of mu, delta, kappa, and opioid receptor-like (ORL1) opioid receptors in the brains and spinal cords of wild-type and homozygous A(2A) receptor knock-out mice. In addition, mu-, delta-, and kappa-mediated antinociception using the tail immersion test was tested in wild-type and homozygous A(2A) receptor knock-out mice. A significant reduction in [3H]deltorphin-I binding to delta receptors and a significant increase in [3H]CI-977 binding to kappa receptors was detected in the spinal cords but not in the brains of the knock-out mice. Mu and ORL1 receptor expression were not altered significantly. Moreover, a significant reduction in delta-mediated antinociception and a significant increase in kappa-mediated antinociception were detected in mutant mice, whereas mu-mediated antinociception was unaffected. Comparison of basal nociceptive latencies showed a significant hypoalgesia in knock-out mice when tested at 55 degrees C but not at 52 degrees C. The results suggest a functional interaction between the spinal delta and kappa opioid and the peripheral adenosine system in the control of pain pathways.

Quantitative autoradiography of adenosine receptors and NBTI-sensitive adenosine transporters in the brains and spinal cords of mice deficient in the mu-opioid receptor gene

There is a large body of evidence indicating important interactions between the adenosine and opioid systems in regulating pain at both the spinal and supraspinal level. Mice lacking the mu-opioid receptor (MOR) gene have been successfully developed and the animals show complete loss of analgesic responses to morphine as well as differences in pain sensitivity. To investigate if there are any compensatory alterations in adenosine systems in mutant animals, we have carried out quantitative autoradiographic mapping of A(1) and A(2A) adenosine receptors and nitrobenzylthioinosine (NBTI) sensitive adenosine transporters in the brains and spinal cords of wild type, heterozygous and homozygous mu-opioid receptor knockout mice. Adjacent coronal sections were cut from the brains and spinal cords of +/+, +/- and -/- mice for the determination of binding of [3H]DPCPX, [3H]CGS21680 or [3H]NBTI to A(1) and A(2A) adenosine receptors and NBTI-sensitive adenosine transporters, respectively. A small but significant reduction in [3H]DPCPX and [3H]NBTI binding was detected in mutant mice brains but not in spinal cords. No significant change in A(2A) binding was detected in mu-opioid receptor knockout brains. The results suggest there may be functional interactions between mu-receptors and A(1) adenosine receptors as well as NBTI-sensitive adenosine transporters in the brain but not in the spinal cord.

Caffeine increases paragigantocellularis neuronal firing rate and induces withdrawal signs in morphine-dependent rats

Using single unit recording in nucleus paragigantocellularis neurons located in the rostral ventrolateral medulla, and measuring the precipitated withdrawal syndrome, we investigated whether chronic morphine administration would produce adaptive changes in the adenosine system. Caffeine (50 mg/kg, i.p.) induced withdrawal signs (head shakes, tooth chattering, ejaculation, chewing, and irritability) in morphine-dependent rats 10-18 min after the injection. Only the tooth chattering and diarrhea were expressed following a direct paragigantocellularis injection of caffeine (200 microM, 0.5 microl). The spontaneous activity of paragigantocellularis neurons was significantly decreased by microinjection of both adenosine (10 nM) and an adenosine A1 receptor-selective agonist, cyclohexyladenosine (200 microM), into the paragigantocellularis nucleus of both control and morphine-dependent rats, but the decrease in firing rate of paragigantocellularis neurons of morphine-dependent rats was greater than that of control ones. There was also a significant enhancement of spontaneous activity of paragigantocellularis neurons 8-15 min after caffeine administration (50 mg/kg, i.p.) and 10-18 min after the injection of an adenosine A1 receptor-selective antagonist 8-phenyltheophylline (10 mg/kg, i.p.) in both control and morphine-dependent rats. However, the effect of the antagonists was greater in morphine-dependent rats than in control ones. These data suggest that there is an increase in the sensitivity of nucleus paragigantocellularis neurons to adenosine receptor ligands in morphine-dependent rats that may be associated with the ability of caffeine to produce withdrawal signs.

Modulation of adenosine concentration by opioid receptor agonists in rat striatum

There is evidence that adenosine and morphine interact in the striatum. However, little is known about the precise role of the opioid receptor subtypes implicated in the modulation of adenosine tissue concentration and in adenosine receptor expression and function. We sought to evaluate, in the absence of withdrawal symptoms, the effects of the short-term administration of selective mu-, delta- or kappa-opioid receptor agonists on adenosine concentration and on adenosine A(2A) receptor function in rat striatum. Adenosine A(2A) receptor was chosen because the neuronal sub-population expressing this receptor coexpresses enkephalin, suggesting that adenosine A(2A) receptor may be regulated by opioid receptor agonists. Oxymorphone hydrochloride mu-opioid receptor agonist, 6 mg/kg/day), +[-(5 alpha,7 alpha, 8 beta)-(-)-N-methyl-N(7-(1-pyrrolidinyl)1-oxaspiro (4.5)dec-8-yl) benzenacetamide] (U69593) (kappa-opioid receptor agonist, 0.75 mg/kg/day), and (+)-4[(alpha R)-alpha-((2S,5R)-4-allyl-2, 5-dimethyl-1-piperazinyl)-3-methoxybenzyl]-N,N-diethylbenzamide) (SNC80) (delta-opioid receptor agonist, 9 mm/kg/day), or vehicle, were administered i.p 3 x daily during 5 days to groups of rats (n=6). We also investigated the effects of opioid receptor agonists on adenosine uptake by striatal cell extracts. We found that administration of mu- or delta-opioid receptor agonists significantly decreased adenosine uptake in striatal cell extracts and increased adenosine concentration (mean+24% and +45% for mu- and delta-opioid receptor agonist, respectively, relative to controls). None of the receptor agonists tested induced obvious modifications of adenosine A(2A) receptor function. However, the delta-opioid receptor agonist induced an increase in adenosine A(2A) mRNA expression (mean 44%). We conclude that mu and delta receptor agonists inhibit adenosine uptake by striatal cell extracts and increase adenosine concentrations in rat striatum.

Adenosine A(2) receptors inhibit morphine self-administration in rats

In the present study, the effect of adenosine receptor agonists and antagonists on morphine self-administration was investigated. Intravenous administration of morphine (0.3-3 mg/kg/injection) induced dose-dependent self-administration. The adenosine receptor antagonists, theophylline (2.5, 5, 10 mg/kg) and 3, 7-Dimethyl-1-propargylxanthine (DMPX; 0.25, 0.5, 1 mg/kg), when injected 1 h before the start of the test, reduced the number of self-administered morphine infusions. The adenosine receptor antagonists when administered in the training period (11 days) greatly increased the number of morphine infusions, however, they did not induce any response by themselves. 5'-N-ethylcarboxamido-adenosine (NECA; 0.5, 1 mg/kg) and 4-[2-[[6-Amino-9-(N-ethyl-beta-D-ribofuranuronamidosyl)-9H-purin-2 -yl ]amino] ethyl]benzenepropanoic acid (CGS21680; 0.001, 0.01, 0.025, 0. 05 mg/kg), given 1 h before the start of the test, increased morphine self-administration. Although the adenosine agonists, when injected during training period (11 days), reduced morphine self-administration. Furthermore, NECA, but not CGS21680, induced significant self-administration. The adenosine A(1) receptor agonist, N(6)-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA; 0.01, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5 and 1 mg/kg), and the adenosine A(1) receptor antagonist, 8-phenyletheophylline (2, 4, 6, 8 mg/kg), themselves neither altered morphine infusion nor induced any response. These results indicate a role for adenosine A(2) receptors in the expression and/or development of morphine self-administration.

Role of adenosine A1 and A2A receptors in the alcohol withdrawal syndrome

The role of adenosine receptor-mediated signaling was examined in the alcohol withdrawal syndrome. CD-1 mice received a liquid diet containing ethanol (6.7%, v/v) or a control liquid diet that were abruptly discontinued after 14 days of treatment. Mice consuming ethanol showed a progressive increase in signs of intoxication throughout the drinking period. Following abrupt discontinuation of ethanol diet, mice demonstrated reversible signs of handling-induced hyperexcitability that were maximal between 5-8 h. Withdrawing mice received treatment with adenosine receptor agonists at the onset of peak withdrawal (5.5 h) and withdrawal signs were blindly rated (during withdrawal hours 6 and 7). Adenosine A1-receptor agonist R-N6(phenylisopropyl)adenosine (0.15 and 0.3 mg/ kg) reduced withdrawal signs 0.5 and 1.5 h after drug administration in a dose-dependent fashion. Adenosine A2A-selective agonist 2-p-(2-carboxyethyl)phenylethyl-amino-5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (0.3 mg/kg) reduced withdrawal signs at both time points. In ethanol-withdrawing mice, there were significant decreases in adenosine transporter sites in striatum without changes in cortex or cerebellum. In ethanol-withdrawing mice, there were no changes in adenosine A1 and A2A receptor concentrations in cortex, striatum, or cerebellum. There appears to be a role for adenosine A1 and A2A receptors in the treatment of the ethanol withdrawal syndrome. Published by Elsevier Science Inc.

Epidermal growth factor (EGF)-induced up-regulation and agonist- and antagonist-induced desensitization and internalization of A1 adenosine receptors in a pituitary-derived cell line

This report concerns the study of homologous and heterologous regulation of cell surface A1 adenosine receptors (A1R) in a pituitary-derived cell line. This has been possible by the use of the recently developed anti-A1R antibodies in immunocytochemical assays. Functional desensitization and internalization of A1R in GH4 cells occurred after treatment with agonist but also with antagonist. Epidermal growth factor (EGF) treatment led to the up-regulation of cell surface A1R in GH4 cells. Confocal analysis evidenced an EGF-induced increase of A1R present in intracellular clathrin-coated vesicles. The up-regulation was blocked by actinomycin D thus suggesting the involvement of protein synthesis in the effect induced by the growth factor. These results constitute the first example of adenosine receptor regulation by EGF and one of the few examples of antagonist-induced desensitization and internalization among G-protein-coupled receptors.

Adenosine kinase inhibitors attenuate opiate withdrawal via adenosine receptor activation

Previous studies have demonstrated a role for adenosine in mediating opiate effects. This study examines the effects of indirect activation of adenosine receptors, via treatment with adenosine kinase inhibitors, on the expression of opiate withdrawal in mice. Mice receive chronic morphine treatment via implantation of subcutaneous morphine pellets (75 mg) for 72 h. Mice then receive parenteral treatment with adenosine kinase inhibitors, either 5'-amino-5'-deoxyadenosine (2, 5, 20, 40 mg/kg, intraperitoneal or i.p.) or iodotubericidin (1, 2, 5 mg/kg, i.p.), followed by naloxone injection and opiate withdrawal signs are measured over 20 min. Both adenosine kinase inhibitors significantly reduce the following opiate withdrawal signs in a dose-dependent manner compared to vehicle: withdrawal jumps, teeth chattering, forepaw tremors, and forepaw treads. Additionally, 5'-amino-5'-deoxyadenosine significantly reduces withdrawal-induced diarrhea and weight loss. Effects of 5'-amino-5'-deoxyadenosine (40 mg/kg) on opiate withdrawal signs appear to be mediated via adenosine receptor activation as they are reversed by pretreatment by adenosine receptor antagonist caffeine (20 mg, i.p.) but not by selective phosphodiesterase inhibitor Ro 20-1724 (10 mg/kg, i.p.). Adenosine receptor activation via adenosine kinase inhibitor treatment attenuates opiate withdrawal and these agents may be generally useful in the treatment of drug withdrawal syndromes.

Adenosine receptor activation and nociception

Adenosine and ATP exert multiple influences on pain transmission at peripheral and spinal sites. At peripheral nerve terminals in rodents, adenosine A1 receptor activation produces antinociception by decreasing, while adenosine A1 receptor activation produces pronociceptive or pain enhancing properties by increasing, cyclic AMP levels in the sensory nerve terminal. Adenosine A3 receptor activation produces pain behaviours due to the release of histamine and 5-hydroxytryptamine from mast cells and subsequent actions on the sensory nerve terminal. In humans, the peripheral administration of adenosine produces pain responses resembling that generated under ischemic conditions and the local release of adenosine may contribute to ischemic pain. In the spinal cord, adenosine A receptor activation produces antinociceptive properties in acute nociceptive, inflammatory and neuropathic pain tests. This is seen at doses lower than those which produce motor effects. Antinociception results from the inhibition of intrinsic neurons by an increase in K+ conductance and presynaptic inhibition of sensory nerve terminals to inhibit the release of substance P and perhaps glutamate. There are observations suggesting some involvement of spinal adenosine A2 receptors in pain processing, but no data on any adenosine A3 receptor involvement. Endogenous adenosine systems contribute to antinociceptive properties of caffeine, opioids, noradrenaline, 5-hydroxytryptamine, tricyclic antidepressants and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Purinergic systems exhibit a significant potential for development as therapeutic agents. An understanding of the contribution of adenosine to pain processing is important for understanding how caffeine produces adjuvant analgesic properties in some situations, but might interfere with the optimal benefit to be derived from others.

Regulation of G protein-mediated adenylyl cyclase in striatum and cortex of opiate-dependent and opiate withdrawing mice

Previous research has demonstrated that acute and chronic opiate treatment alters receptor- and postreceptor-mediated adenylyl cyclase activity. This study examined the regulation of G protein- and forskolin-mediated adenylyl cyclase activity in mouse striatum and cortex after short- and long-term opiate exposure. To directly measure adenylyl cyclase enzymatic activity, assays were done in the presence of catalytic site activator forskolin. To measure G protein-mediated adenylyl cyclase activity, assays were performed in the presence of non-hydrolyzable guanosine 5'-triphosphate (GTP) analogue, 5'-guanylyl-imidodiphosphate. Short-term in vitro morphine exposure produced reductions in forskolin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity in striatal and cortical tissues. Long-term morphine treatment in mice was performed via morphine- or placebo-pellet implantation for 72 h; this treatment has been shown to produce opiate dependence and withdrawal. In both opiate-dependent and opiate withdrawing mice (1 h post-naloxone induction), there were significant increases in G protein-mediated adenylyl cyclase activity in the striatum (vs. controls). In opiate-dependent mice, there was an decrease in G protein-mediated adenylyl cyclase activity in cortex. In opiate-dependent mice, there were no changes in forskolin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase in the striatum or cortex. Increases in striatal G protein-mediated adenylyl cyclase could represent a compensatory adaptation that opposes the persistent inhibition of adenylyl cyclase by chronic opiate treatment contributing to the expression of opiate dependence and withdrawal.

Effect of adenosine receptor agonists and antagonists on the expression of opiate withdrawal in rats

The effects of the selective A1 adenosine receptor agonist N6-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA) and the selective A2a agonist 2-[p-(2-carboxethyl)phenylethyl-ethylamino]-5'-ethylcarboxamidoade nosine (CGS 21680) (each at 0.03, 0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg, SC) as well as the selective A1 adenosine receptor antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX), non-selective antagonists 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX), aminophylline, 3,7-dimethyl-1-propargyl-xanthine (DMPX) and 8(p-sulfophenyl)-theophylline (8-SPT) were investigated (each at 5, 10 and 30 mg/kg, SC) for their ability to alter the naloxone-precipitated opiate withdrawal syndrome in morphine-dependent rats. Effects of CPA and CGS 21680 on opiate withdrawal in the presence of aminophylline were also investigated. Both CPA and CGS 21680, caused a significant reduction in the incidence of body shakes, teeth chatter and paw shakes and decreased the amount of faecal matter produced. DPCPX, IBMX, DMPX, 8-SPT and aminophylline significantly increased the incidence of jumps and decreased the amount of faecal matter produced. The incidence of body shakes was significantly increased by DMPX, 8-SPT and IBMX. Neither CPA nor CGS 21680 were able to reverse the significant increase in the incidence of jumps caused by aminophylline. These data suggest that there is a role for endogenous adenosine in the modulation of the opiate abstinence syndrome and both A1 and A2a adenosine receptors are involved in this phenomenon.

Up-regulation of adenosine transporter-binding sites in striatum and hypothalamus of opiate tolerant mice

Opioid-adenosine interactions have been demonstrated at both cellular and behavioral levels. Short-term morphine treatment has been shown to enhance adenosine release in brain and spinal tissues. Since adenosine uptake and release is regulated by a nitrobenzylthioinosine-sensitive adenosine transporter, we examined the effects of morphine treatment on this transporter-binding site. Adenosine transporter-binding sites were examined using equilibrium binding studies with [3H]nitrobenzylthioinosine in brain regions of morphine-treated mice. A 72-hour morphine pellet implantation procedure, which previously produced up-regulation of central adenosine A1 receptors and created a state of opiate dependence [G.B. Kaplan, K.A. Leite-Morris and M.T. Sears, Alterations in adenosine A receptors in morphine dependence, Brain Res., 657 (1994) 347-350], was used in this current study. This chronic morphine treatment significantly increased adenosine transporter-binding site concentrations in striatum and hypothalamus by 12 and 37%, respectively, compared to vehicle pellet implantation. No effects of morphine treatment were demonstrated in cortex, hippocampus, brainstem or cerebellum. In behavioral studies, mice receiving this same chronic morphine or vehicle treatment were given saline or morphine injections (40 or 50 mg/kg i.p.) followed by ambulatory activity monitoring. In the chronic vehicle treatment group, morphine injections significantly stimulated ambulatory activity while in the chronic morphine treatment group there was no such stimulation by acute morphine, suggestive of opiate tolerance. Morphine-induced up-regulation of striatal and hypothalamic adenosine transporter sites could potentially alter extracellular adenosine release and adenosine receptor activation and mediate aspects of opiate tolerance and dependence.

Adenosine receptor agonists attenuate and adenosine receptor antagonists exacerbate opiate withdrawal signs

Previous studies have demonstrated a role for adenosine in mediating opiate effects. Adenosine receptors and their functions have been shown to be regulated by chronic opiate treatment. This study examines the role of adenosine receptors in the expression of opiate withdrawal behaviors. The effects of single doses of parenterally administered adenosine receptor subtype-selective agonists and antagonists on opiate withdrawal signs in morphine-dependent mice were measured. Mice received subcutaneous morphine pellet treatment for 72 h and then underwent naloxone-precipitated withdrawal after pretreatment with adenosinergic agents. Adenosine agonists attenuated different opiate withdrawal signs. The A1 agonist R-N6(phenylisopropyl)adenosine (0, 0.01, 0.02 mg/kg, IP) significantly reduced wet dog shakes and withdrawal diarrhea, while the A2a-selective agonist 2-p-(2-carboxethyl)phenylethylamino-5'-N-ethylcarboxamido adenosine or CGS 21680 (0, 0.01, 0.05 mg/kg, IP) significantly inhibited teeth chattering and forepaw treads. Adenosine receptor antagonists enhanced different opiate withdrawal signs. The adenosine A1 antagonist 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (0, 1, 10 mg/kg, IP) significantly increased weight loss and the A2 antagonist, 3,7-dimethyl-1-propargylxanthine (0, 1 and 10 mg/kg, IP) enhanced wet dog shakes and withdrawal diarrhea. Treatment effects of adenosinergic agents were not due to nonspecific motor effects, as demonstrated by activity monitoring studies. These results support a role for adenosine receptors in the expression of opiate withdrawal and suggest the potential utility of adenosine agonists in its treatment.

Endogenous opiates: 1994

This article is the 17th installment of our annual review of research concerning the opiate system. It includes papers published during 1994 involving the behavioral, nonanalgesic, effects of the endogenous opiate peptides. The specific topics covered this year include stress; tolerance and dependence; eating; drinking; gastrointestinal, renal, and hepatic function; mental illness and mood; learning, memory, and reward; cardiovascular responses; respiration and thermoregulation; seizures and other neurological disorders; electrical-related activity; general activity and locomotion; sex, pregnancy, and development; immunological responses; and other behaviors.