The CCKA receptor antagonist devazepide does not modify opioid self-administration or drug discrimination: comparison with the dopamine antagonist haloperidol

Heroin and its metabolites: relevance to heroin use disorder

Heroin is an opioid agonist commonly abused for its rewarding effects. Since its synthesis at the end of the nineteenth century, its popularity as a recreational drug has ebbed and flowed. In the last three decades, heroin use has increased again, and yet the pharmacology of heroin is still poorly understood. After entering the body, heroin is rapidly deacetylated to 6-monoacetylmorphine (6-MAM), which is then deacetylated to morphine. Thus, drug addiction literature has long settled on the notion that heroin is little more than a pro-drug. In contrast to these former views, we will argue for a more complex interplay among heroin and its active metabolites: 6-MAM, morphine, and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G). In particular, we propose that the complex temporal pattern of heroin effects results from the sequential, only partially overlapping, actions not only of 6-MAM, morphine, and M6G, but also of heroin per se, which, therefore, should not be seen as a mere brain-delivery system for its active metabolites. We will first review the literature concerning the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of heroin and its metabolites, then examine their neural and behavioral effects, and finally discuss the possible implications of these data for a better understanding of opioid reward and heroin addiction. By so doing we hope to highlight research topics to be investigated by future clinical and pre-clinical studies.

Neural circuit mechanisms of the cholecystokinin (CCK) neuropeptide system in addiction

Given historical focus on the roles for cholecystokinin (CCK) as a peripheral hormone controlling gastrointestinal processes and a brainstem peptide regulating food intake, the study of CCK as a limbic neuromodulator coordinating reward-seeking and emotional behavior remains underappreciated. Furthermore, localization of CCK to specialized interneurons throughout the hippocampus and cortex relegated CCK to being examined primarily as a static cell type marker rather than a dynamic functional neuromodulator. Yet, over three decades of literature have been generated by efforts to delineate the central mechanisms of addiction-related behaviors mediated by the CCK system across the striatum, amygdala, hypothalamus, and midbrain. Here, we cover fundamental findings that implicate CCK neuron activity and CCK receptor signaling in modulating drug intake and drug-seeking (focusing on psychostimulants, opioids, and alcohol). In doing so, we highlight the few studies that indicate sex differences in CCK expression and corresponding drug effects, emphasizing the importance of examining hormonal influences and sex as a biological variable in translating basic science discoveries to effective treatments for substance use disorders in human patients. Finally, we point toward understudied subcortical sources of endogenous CCK and describe how continued neurotechnology advancements can be leveraged to modernize understanding of the neural circuit mechanisms underlying CCK release and signaling in addiction-relevant behaviors.

Medications development for food-based and drug use disorders

Despite decades of research, few medications have gained Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for the management of substance abuse disorder. The paucity of successful medications can be attributed, in part, to the lack of clearly identified neurobiological targets for addressing the core pathology of addictive behavior. Commonalities in the behavioral and brain processes involved in the rewarding effects of drugs and foods has prompted the evaluation of candidate medications that target neural pathways involved in both drug and eating disorders. Here, pharmacological strategies for the development of novel medications for drug addiction are presented in the context of potential overlapping neurobiological targets identified for eating disorders (e.g., obesity, overeating, binge-eating) and substance abuse. Mechanisms discussed in this chapter include modulators of the gut-brain axis (e.g., leptin, ghrelin, cholecystokinin, cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated transcript, and pancreatic peptides) and neurotransmitter systems (e.g., opioids, cannabinoids, dopamine, serotonin, and acetylcholine).

The unappreciated roles of the cholecystokinin receptor CCK(1) in brain functioning

The CCK(1) receptor is a G-protein-coupled receptor activated by the sulfated forms of cholecystokinin (CCK), a gastrin-like peptide released in the gastrointestinal tract and mammal brain. A substantial body of research supports the hypothesis that CCK(1)r stimulates gallbladder contraction and pancreatic secretion in the gut, as well as satiety in brain. However, this receptor may also fulfill relevant roles in behavior, thanks to its widespread distribution in the brain. The strategic location of CCK(1)r in mesolimbic structures and specific hypothalamic and brainstem nuclei lead to complex interactions with neurotransmitters like dopamine, serotonin, and glutamate, as well as hypothalamic hormones and neuropeptides. The activity of CCK(1)r maintains adequate levels of dopamine and regulates the activity of serotonin neurons of raphe nuclei, which makes CCK(1)r an interesting therapeutic target for the development of adjuvant treatments for schizophrenia, drug addiction, and mood disorders. Unexplored functions of CCK(1)r, like the transmission of interoceptive sensitivity in addition to the regulation of hypothalamic hormones and neurotransmitters affecting emotional states, well-being, and attachment behaviors, may open exciting roads of research. The absence of specific ligands for the CCK(1) receptor has complicated the study of its distribution in brain so that research about its impact on behavior has been published sporadically over the last 30 years. The present review reunites all this body of evidence in a comprehensive way to summarize our knowledge about the actual role of CCK in the neurobiology of mental illness.

Acetaldehyde oral self-administration: evidence from the operant-conflict paradigm

BACKGROUND

Acetaldehyde (ACD), ethanol's first metabolite, has been reported to interact with the dopaminergic reward system, and with the neural circuits involved in stress response. Rats self-administer ACD directly into cerebral ventricles, and multiple intracerebroventricular infusions of ACD produce conditioned place preference. Self-administration has been largely employed to assess the reinforcing and addictive properties of most drugs of abuse. In particular, operant conditioning is a valid model to investigate drug-seeking and drug-taking behavior in rats.

METHODS

This study was aimed at the evaluation of (i) the motivational properties of oral ACD in the induction and maintenance of an operant-drinking behavior; (ii) ACD effect in a conflict situation employing the punishment-based Geller-Seifter procedure; and (iii) the onset of a relapse drinking behavior, following ACD deprivation. The lever-pressing procedure in a sound-attenuated operant-conditioning chamber was scheduled into 3 different periods: (i) training-rewarded responses with a fixed ratio 1; (ii) conflict-rewarded responses periodically associated with a 0.2 mA foot-shock; and (iii) relapse-rewarded lever presses following 1-week ACD abstinence.

RESULTS

Our results show that oral self-administrated ACD induced: a higher rate of punished responses in Geller-Seifter procedures; and the establishment of a relapse behavior following ACD deprivation.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, our results indicate that ACD is able to induce an operant-drinking behavior, which is also maintained besides the conflict procedure and enhanced by the deprivation effect, supporting the hypothesis that ACD itself possesses motivational properties, such as alcohol and other substances of abuse.

Effects of central neurokinin-1 receptor antagonism on cocaine- and opiate-induced locomotor activity and self-administration behaviour in rats

The neuropeptide substance P (SP) and its preferred receptor, the neurokinin-1 (NK-1) receptor, have been implicated in some of the reward-related behavioural effects of abused drugs, including psychostimulants and opiates. The first objective of the present series of experiments was to assess the role of the NK-1 receptor in two reward-related behavioural effects of cocaine: locomotor activity and self-administration. In tests for locomotor activity, rats were given intracerebroventricular (ICV) infusions of the selective NK-1 receptor antagonist, GR82334 (0, 10, 50 pmol), prior to systemic injections of cocaine. In self-administration experiments, rats were trained to self-administer cocaine on a fixed-ratio 5 (FR5) schedule of reinforcement. Following acquisition of stable responding, animals were pretreated with GR82334 (0, 2, 10, 50 pmol; ICV) prior to subsequent self-administration sessions. Based on evidence suggesting a potentially selective role for NK-1 receptors in opiate reward, we also examined the effects of GR82334 on morphine-induced locomotor activity and heroin self-administration. Results showed that GR82334 had no effect on cocaine-induced locomotor activity or cocaine self-administration, but attenuated morphine-induced locomotor activity and increased heroin self-administration. These findings suggest that endogenous activity at NK-1 receptors may play a specific role in opiate-induced, but not cocaine-induced, locomotor activation and reinforcement.

Brain substrates for increased drug seeking during protracted withdrawal

Studies are reviewed indicating that both increased anxiety and altered hedonic processing accompany protracted withdrawal from opiates. Increased anxiety may be most apparent in response to stress, whereas decreased motivation for natural rewards but increased interest in drugs reveals substantial alterations in hedonic values. Our recent work indicates that increased norepinephrine (NE) release in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) may underlie anxiety associated with protracted withdrawal. Altered plasticity in afferents to the ventral tegmental area (VTA; accumbens, amygdala and lateral hypothalamus), or in the VTA itself, may be involved in the altered hedonic processing that occurs during protracted withdrawal. We hypothesize that conditioned release of NE in the BNST in response to stressors (including drug-associated stimuli) may elevate anxiety which then augments the reward value of drugs by a negative reinforcement mechanism. We also propose that plasticity in VTA neurons and their afferents during chronic drug exposure and protracted withdrawal decreases the valence of natural rewards whereas sensitization occurs to the motivational effects of drugs that increases their motivational valence. The combination of anxiety, decreased valence of natural rewards, and sensitized incentive for drugs make a potent formula for relapse and drug seeking during protracted withdrawal.

OLETF (Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty) rats that lack the CCK 1 (A) receptor develop less behavioral sensitization to repeated cocaine treatment than wild type LETO (Long Evans Tokushima Otsuka) rats

OLETF (Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty) lacking the CCK 1 (A) receptor have similar spontaneous activity and locomotor response (horizontal and vertical activity) in response to a single injection of cocaine as the wild type LETO (Long Evans Tokushima Otsuka) rats. In contrast, the OLETF rats display more stereotypy in response to the first dose of cocaine than the LETO rats. Tested at 7 and 14 days after a one week daily treatment with cocaine, the LETO rats display robust behavioral sensitization to cocaine while the OLETF rats did not. These results support the hypothesis that endogenous CCK released by cocaine treatment and acting at CCK 1 receptors is required for the development and/or expression of this behavior.

Analgesic doses of the enkephalin degrading enzyme inhibitor RB 120 do not have discriminative stimulus properties

The systemically active mixed inhibitor of enkephalin metabolism, N-((S)-2-benzyl-3[(S) 2-amino-4-methylthio)butyldithio-]-1-oxopropyl)-L-alanine benzylester (RB 120), alone or in combination with 4-¿[2-[[3-(1H-indol-3-yl))-2-methyl-1-oxo-2-[[(tricyclo[3.3.1.1. ]dec-2-yloxy) carbonyl]amino¿propyl]amino]-1-phenylethyl]amino¿-4-oxo-[R-(R*, R*)]-butanoate N-methyl-D-glucamine (CI 988; CCK(1) receptor antagonist) was investigated for discriminative and morphine generalisation effects using an operant drug discrimination paradigm in rats. Animals dosed with RB 120 (10 mg/kg) failed to develop a discriminative response. Combined CI 988 (0.3 mg/kg) and RB 120 (10 mg/kg) also failed to elicit a discriminative response. Morphine-trained animals (3.0 mg/kg) did not generalise to RB 120 (10 and 20 mg/kg). Similarly, subsequent retraining of the same animals with 1.5 mg/kg of morphine did not elicit generalisation to RB 120 (10 or 20 mg/kg). Combined RB 120 (10 or 20 mg/kg) and CI 988 (0.3 or 3.0 mg/kg) treatment produced no notable drug lever selection in rats able to discriminate morphine (1.5 mg/kg) from saline. These results suggest that RB 120 may have low abuse potential at analgesic doses.

CCK-B receptor: chemistry, molecular biology, biochemistry and pharmacology

Cholecystokinin (CCK) is a peptide originally discovered in the gastrointestinal tract but also found in high density in the mammalian brain. The C-terminal sulphated octapeptide fragment of cholecystokinin (CCK8) constitutes one of the major neuropeptides in the brain; CCK8 has been shown to be involved in numerous physiological functions such as feeding behavior, central respiratory control and cardiovascular tonus, vigilance states, memory processes, nociception, emotional and motivational responses. CCK8 interacts with nanomolar affinities with two different receptors designated CCK-A and CCK-B. The functional role of CCK and its binding sites in the brain and periphery has been investigated thanks to the development of potent and selective CCK receptor antagonists and agonists. In this review, the strategies followed to design these probes, and their use to study the anatomy of CCK pathways, the neurochemical and pharmacological properties of this peptide and the clinical perspectives offered by manipulation of the CCK system will be reported. The physiological and pathological implication of CCK-B receptor will be confirmed in CCK-B receptor deficient mice obtained by gene targeting (Nagata el al., 1996. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 11825-11830). Moreover, CCK receptor gene structure, deletion and mutagenesis experiments, and signal transduction mechanisms will be discussed.

Analgesia and abuse potential: an accidental association or a common substrate?

The fact that centrally acting analgesics have abuse potential commensurate with their analgesic activity raises the question of whether these effects are related. The abuse potential of drugs depends on their ability to produce reinforcing effects, which are mediated by a neural system that includes the ventral tegmental dopamine cells and their connections with the ventral striatum. Morphine and amphetamine are both powerful analgesics and have high abuse potential. Their analgesic and reinforcing effects are mediated by similar receptors, similar sites of action, and overlapping neural substrates. These coincidences suggest that reinforcers may produce analgesia by transforming the aversive affective state evoked by pain into a more positive affective state. The implications of this hypothesis and its relation to other known mechanisms of analgesia are discussed. The hypothesis predicts that drugs with reinforcing effects should produce analgesia. A survey of drugs acting through 21 classes of receptors reveals that in 13 classes there is evidence for both analgesic and reinforcing effects that are approximately equipotent. The GABA(A) agonists were found to be the only drugs with confirmed abuse potential that lack analgesic activity. The interpretation of this and several other anomalous cases is discussed.

Evidence for CCK(A) receptor involvement in the acquisition of conditioned activity produced by cocaine in rats

Cholecystokinin (CCK) is co-localized with dopamine (DA) in the nucleus accumbens (NAC) where evidence suggests that CCK(B) receptor-mediated mechanisms inhibit, while CCK(A) receptor-mediated mechanisms facilitate, DA function. As DA has been implicated in the acquisition of conditioned activity, the present experiments investigated the effects of CCK(A) and CCK(B) receptor selective antagonists on the acquisition and expression of conditioned activity produced by cocaine. Paired rats received four cocaine-environment pairings whereas Unpaired rats received the two stimuli explicitly unpaired, in that they received cocaine in the home cage. Using this procedure, cocaine (10 mg/kg, i.p.) reliably produced conditioned activity such that the Paired group showed a higher level of locomotion than the Unpaired group on a subsequent drug-free test day. Systemic administration of devazepide, a CCK(A) receptor antagonist, but not L-365,260, a CCK(B) receptor antagonist, blocked the acquisition of conditioned activity. Microinjection of the CCK(A) antagonist PD-140548 into the NAC similarly impaired the acquisition of conditioned activity. However, systemic administration of neither the CCK(A) nor CCK(B) receptor antagonist modified the expression of cocaine-induced conditioned activity once established. These studies suggest that CCK(A), but not CCK(B), receptor mediated mechanisms in the NAC play a key role in the acquisition of conditioned activity.

Neurobiological constraints on behavioral models of motivation

The application of neurobiological tools to behavioral questions has produced a number of working models of the mechanisms mediating the rewarding and aversive properties of stimuli. The authors review and compare three models that differ in the nature and number of the processes identified. The dopamine hypothesis, a single system model, posits that the neurotransmitter dopamine plays a fundamental role in mediating the rewarding properties of all classes of stimuli. In contrast, both nondeprived/deprived and saliency attribution models claim that separate systems make independent contributions to reward. The former identifies the psychological boundary defined by the two systems as being between states of nondeprivation (e.g. food sated) and deprivation (e.g. hunger). The latter identifies a boundary between liking and wanting systems. Neurobiological dissociations provide tests of and explanatory power for behavioral theories of goal-directed behavior.

Association of enkephalin catabolism inhibitors and CCK-B antagonists: a potential use in the management of pain and opioid addiction

The overlapping distribution of opioid and cholecystokinin (CCK) peptides and their receptors (mu and delta opioid receptors; CCK-A and CCK-B receptors) in the central nervous system have led to a large number of studies aimed at clarifying the functional relationships between these two neuropeptides. Most of the pharmacological studies devoted to the role of CCK and enkephalins have been focused on the control of pain. Recently the existence of regulatory mechanisms between both systems have been proposed, and the physiological antagonism between CCK and endogenous opioid systems has been definitely demonstrated by coadministration of CCK-B selective antagonists with RB 101, a systemically active inhibitor, which fully protects enkephalins from their degradation. Several studies have also been done to investigate the functional relationships between both systems in development of opioid side-effects and in behavioral responses. This article will review the experimental pharmacology of association of enkephalin-degrading enzyme inhibitors and CCK-B antagonists to demonstrate the interest of these molecules in the management of both pain and opioid addiction.

Effect of CCK receptor antagonists on the antinociceptive, reinforcing and gut motility properties of morphine

1. The ability of a selective CCKA receptor antagonist PD 140548 and a selective CCKB receptor antagonist CI-988 (formerly PD 134308) to modulate the various in vivo properties of morphine was investigated in the rat. 2. PD 140548 dose-dependently (0.001-1.0 mg kg-1, i.p.) antagonised the development of conditioned place preference to morphine (2.0 mg kg-1, s.c.). In contrast, CI-988 (0.01-1.0 mg kg-1, i.p.) did not affect this morphine-induced behaviour. Neither of the CCK receptor antagonists blocked or generalised to the morphine (3.0 mg kg-1, i.p.) discriminative stimulus. 3. CI-988 (0.001-10.0 mg kg-1, s.c.) at doses of 0.05 and 0.1 mg kg-1 (s.c.), potentiated the antinociceptive action of a threshold dose of morphine (5.0 mg kg-1, i.p.) in a radiant heat model of acute nociception, the rat tail flick test. Furthermore, at 0.01 mg kg-1 it potentiated the antinociceptive action of morphine (3.0 mg kg-1) during the acute phase of the rat paw formalin test. And at doses of 0.01 and 0.1 mg kg-1 it also potentiated the antinociceptive action of morphine (1.0 mg kg-1) during the tonic phase of the formalin test. However, in both models, higher doses of CI-988 were ineffective. In contrast, PD 140548 (0.001-10 mg kg-1, s.c.) was only active at a dose of 1.0 mg kg-1 (s.c.) and only in the tonic phase of the formalin test. Neither CI-988 nor PD 140548 possessed any intrinsic antinociceptive action in either of the tests. Chronic treatment with CI-988 (0.01 mg kg-1, s.c.) prevented the development of tolerance to morphine antinociception (4 mg kg-1, s.c.) following a 6 day period of twice daily injections of morphine escalating from 1 to 16 mg kg-1 (i.p.). 4. Morphine dose-dependently (1-10 mg kg-1, s.c.) reduced the distance travelled by a charcoal meal in the rat intestine. Neither PD 140548 (0.01-1.0 mg kg-1, i.p.) nor CI-988 (0.01-1.0 mg kg-1, i.p.) potentiated or suppressed this inhibitory action of morphine. 5. In conclusion, the results of the present study indicate that CCKA and CCKB receptors modulate different properties of morphine. Thus, whilst a selective CCKA receptor antagonist blocked the rewarding properties of morphine, a selective CCKB receptor antagonist potentiated the antinociceptive action. However, neither compound displayed a potential for modulating the influence of morphine on gastro-intestinal motility. It is suggested that these findings may have important implications for development of CCK receptor antagonists as analgesic adjuncts to the therapeutic use of morphine.

Devazepide, a CCKA receptor antagonist, impairs the acquisition of conditioned reward and conditioned activity

Cholecystokinin (CCK) is co-localized with dopamine (DA) in portions of the mesolimbic system, where it may facilitate the function of DA through the CCKA receptor subtype. DA has been implicated in the acquisition of conditioned incentive learning, raising the possibility of a role for endogenous CCK in this learning process. This hypothesis was tested using two complementary behavioral paradigms. Experiment 1 examined the effects of systemic administration of the CCKA receptor selective antagonist, devazepide (0, 0.001, 0.01, 0.1 mg/kg), on the acquisition of conditioned reward. Two novel levers were presented to drug-free animals in a test session; depression of the conditioned reward (CR) lever produced a light-tone stimulus previously paired with food availability while depression of the non-CR lever produced no programmed consequence. Animals receiving vehicle pretreatment in the food-CS conditioning sessions responded more frequently on the CR lever during the test session. However, pre-treatment with devazepide (0.1 mg/kg but not 0.001 or 0.01 mg/kg) in the conditioning sessions blocked the acquisition of conditioned reward. In contrast, experiment 2 showed that the development of conditioned reward was not affected by similar administration of the CCKB selective antagonist, L-365,260 (0, 0.001, 0.01, or 0.1 mg/kg). The possibilities that devazepide (0.1 mg/kg) impaired the development of conditioned reward by decreasing the amount of food consumed or by inducing a conditioned taste aversion to the food were ruled out in experiments 3 and 4. The effects of devazepide on the acquisition of conditioned activity induced by amphetamine were assessed in experiment 5. During four conditioning sessions, rats received devazepide (0, 0.001, 0.01, 0.1 or 1.0 mg/kg) treatment prior to amphetamine-environment pairings. The conditioned activity effect was demonstrated if on the subsequent drug-free test day the environment alone elicited increased locomotion. Devazepide (0.1 or 1.0 mg/kg) attenuated the development of conditioned activity. Together, these results provide converging evidence that intact CCKA function may be necessary for the development of conditioned incentive learning.

Discriminative stimulus properties of morphine mediated by mu 1-opioid receptors

The mu-opioid receptor subtypes involved in the discriminative stimulus properties of morphine were investigated in rats that had been trained to discriminate between 3.0 mg/kg morphine and saline. The discriminative stimulus properties of morphine were significantly attenuated by beta-funaltrexamine (an irreversible mu-opioid receptor antagonist: 10 and 20 mg/kg) and naloxonazine (an irreversible mu 1-opioid receptor antagonist: 20 mg/kg). These results suggest that the discriminative stimulus properties of morphine may be mediated by mu 1-opioid receptors.

Opioid and anti-opioid peptides

The numerous endogenous opioid peptides (beta-endorphin, enkephalins, dynorphins ... ) and the exogenous opioids (such as morphine) exert their effects through the activation of receptors belonging to four main types, mu, delta, kappa and epsilon. Opioidergic neurones and opioid receptors are largely distributed centrally and peripherally. It is thus not surprising that opioids have numerous pharmacological effects and that endogenous opioids are thought to be involved in the physiological control of various functions, among which nociception is particularly emphasized. Some opioid targets may be components of homeostatic systems tending to reduce the effects of opioids. "Anti-opioid" properties have been attributed to various peptides, especially cholecystokinin (CCK), neuropeptide FF (NPFF) and melanocyte inhibiting factor (MIF)-related peptides. In addition, a particular place should be attributed, paradoxically, to opioid peptides themselves among the anti-opioid peptides. These peptides can oppose some of the acute effects of opioids, and a hyperactivation of anti-opioid peptidergic neurones due to the chronic administration of opioids may be involved in the development of opioid tolerance and/or dependence. In fact, CCK, NPFF and the MIF family of peptides have complex properties and can act as opioid-like as well as anti-opioid peptides. Thus, "opioid modulating peptides" would be a better term to designate these peptides, which probably participate, together with the opioid systems, in multiple feed-back loops for the maintenance of homeostasis. "Opioid modulating peptides" have generally been shown to act through the activation of their own receptors. For example, CCK appears to exert its anti-opioid actions mainly through the activation of CCK-B receptors, whereas its opioid-like effects seem to result from the stimulation of CCK-A receptors. However, the partial agonistic properties at opioid receptors of some MIF-related peptides very likely contribute to their ability to modulate the effects of opioids. CCK- and NPFF-related drugs have potential therapeutic interest as adjuncts to opioids for alleviating pain and/or for the treatment of opioid abuse.

Interaction between discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine and morphine

We recently demonstrated that combining cocaine and morphine could enhance their reinforcing effects which may be mediated by the dopaminergic system. In the present study, the effects of cocaine and morphine on the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine and cocaine, respectively, were examined. Furthermore, dopaminergic mediation in the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine was also examined. Pretreatment with 1.0 or 3.0 mg/kg morphine shifted the dose-response curve for cocaine to the left, and 3.0 mg/kg morphine significantly potentiated the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine. On the other hand, neither 1.25 nor 2.5 mg/kg cocaine affected the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine. These results suggest that potentiation of the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine by morphine may reflect the enhancement of reinforcing effects in the combination of cocaine and morphine. Furthermore, neither SCH23390 (D1-receptor antagonist) nor haloperidol (D2-receptor antagonist) affects the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine, while combining these drugs slightly attenuated the effects of morphine. Thus, another neurotransmitter rather than dopamine may play an important role in the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine. Therefore, the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine are apparently not potentiated by cocaine, unlike those of reinforcing effects.

Endogenous opiates: 1994

This article is the 17th installment of our annual review of research concerning the opiate system. It includes papers published during 1994 involving the behavioral, nonanalgesic, effects of the endogenous opiate peptides. The specific topics covered this year include stress; tolerance and dependence; eating; drinking; gastrointestinal, renal, and hepatic function; mental illness and mood; learning, memory, and reward; cardiovascular responses; respiration and thermoregulation; seizures and other neurological disorders; electrical-related activity; general activity and locomotion; sex, pregnancy, and development; immunological responses; and other behaviors.