Plasma levels of levonorgestrel and free levonorgestrel index in women using NORPLANT implants or two covered rods (NORPLANT-2)

Randomized, placebo controlled phase I trial of the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and acceptability of a 90 day tenofovir plus levonorgestrel vaginal ring used continuously or cyclically in women: The CONRAD 138 study

Multipurpose prevention technologies (MPTs), which prevent sexually transmitted infection(s) and unintended pregnancy, are highly desirable to women. In this randomized, placebo-controlled, phase I study, women used a placebo or tenofovir (TFV) and levonorgestrel (LNG) intravaginal ring (IVR), either continuously or cyclically (three, 28-day cycles with a 3 day interruption in between each cycle), for 90 days. Sixty-eight women were screened; 47 were randomized to 4 arms: TFV/LNG or placebo IVRs used continuously or cyclically (4:4:1:1). Safety was assessed by adverse events and changes from baseline in mucosal histology and immune mediators. TFV concentrations were evaluated in multiple compartments. LNG concentration was determined in serum. Modeled TFV pharmacodynamic antiviral activity was evaluated in vaginal and rectal fluids and cervicovaginal tissue ex vivo. LNG pharmacodynamics was assessed with cervical mucus quality and anovulation. All IVRs were safe with no serious adverse events nor significant changes in genital tract histology, immune cell density or secreted soluble proteins from baseline. Median vaginal fluid TFV concentrations were >500 ng/mg throughout 90d. TFV-diphosphate tissue concentrations exceeded 1,000 fmol/mg within 72hrs of IVR insertion. Mean serum LNG concentrations exceeded 200 pg/mL within 2h of TFV/LNG use, decreasing quickly after IVR removal. Vaginal fluid of women using TFV-containing IVRs had significantly greater inhibitory activity (87-98% versus 10% at baseline; p<0.01) against HIV replication in vitro. There was a >10-fold reduction in HIV p24 antigen production from ectocervical tissues after TFV/LNG exposure. TFV/LNG IVR users had significantly higher rates of anovulation, lower Insler scores and poorer/abnormal cervical mucus sperm penetration. Most TFV/LNG IVR users reported no change in menstrual cycles or fewer days of and/or lighter bleeding. All IVRs were safe. Active rings delivered high TFV concentrations locally. LNG caused changes in cervical mucus, sperm penetration, and ovulation compatible with contraceptive efficacy. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT03279120.

Randomized, placebo controlled phase I trial of safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and acceptability of tenofovir and tenofovir plus levonorgestrel vaginal rings in women

To prevent the global health burdens of human immunodeficiency virus [HIV] and unintended/mistimed pregnancies, we developed an intravaginal ring [IVR] that delivers tenofovir [TFV] at ~10mg/day alone or with levonorgestrel [LNG] at ~20μg/day for 90 days. We present safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, acceptability and drug release data in healthy women. CONRAD A13-128 was a randomized, placebo controlled phase I study. We screened 86 women; 51 were randomized to TFV, TFV/LNG or placebo IVR [2:2:1] and 50 completed all visits, using the IVR for approximately 15 days. We assessed safety by adverse events, colposcopy, vaginal microbiota, epithelial integrity, mucosal histology and immune cell numbers and phenotype, cervicovaginal [CV] cytokines and antimicrobial proteins and changes in systemic laboratory measurements, and LNG and TFV pharmacokinetics in multiple compartments. TFV pharmacodynamic activity was measured by evaluating CV fluid [CVF] and tissue for antiviral activity using in vitro models. LNG pharmacodynamic assessments were timed based on peak urinary luteinizing hormone levels. All IVRs were safe with no significant colposcopic, mucosal, immune and microbiota changes and were acceptable. Among TFV containing IVR users, median and mean CV aspirate TFV concentrations remained above 100,000 ng/mL 4 hours post IVR insertion and mean TFV-diphosphate [DP] concentrations in vaginal tissue remained above 1,000 fmol/mg even 3 days post IVR removal. CVF of women using TFV-containing IVRs completely inhibited [94-100%] HIV infection in vitro. TFV/LNG IVR users had mean serum LNG concentrations exceeding 300 pg/mL within 1 hour, remaining high throughout IVR use. All LNG IVR users had a cervical mucus Insler score <10 and the majority [95%] were anovulatory or had abnormal cervical mucus sperm penetration. Estimated in vivo TFV and LNG release rates were within expected ranges. All IVRs were safe with the active ones delivering sustained high concentrations of TFV locally. LNG caused changes in cervical mucus, sperm penetration, and ovulation compatible with contraceptive efficacy. The TFV and TFV/LNG rings are ready for expanded 90 day clinical testing. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT02235662.

Phase I/II pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of two levonorgestrel-only contraceptive patches in a multicenter randomized trial

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of two novel levonorgestrel (LNG)-only contraceptive patches.

STUDY DESIGN

This multi-center Phase I/II trial randomized participants to use a 7-day transdermal patch designed to deliver a 40 mcg or 75 mcg daily LNG dose for 11 consecutive weeks; randomization was stratified by body mass index (BMI) <32 or 32-40 kg/m2. Evaluations occurred twice weekly for 5 weeks, then once weekly with supplemental visits for participants reporting a urinary LH surge. We evaluated pharmacokinetics via the weekly trough serum LNG concentrations (≥180 pg/mL considered therapeutic). The primary pharmacodynamic outcomes were cervical mucus and ovulation, evaluated using modified Insler cervical mucus scores and serum markers of ovulation.

RESULTS

Randomization yielded similar groups. Of 121 enrolled women, 117 contributed analyzable data. Overall, mean LNG concentrations achieved with use of the 75 mcg patch [value] were roughly double those seen with the 40 mcg dose. Concentrations achieved in higher-BMI women (BMI=32-40 kg/m2) were 50% lower compared to lower-BMI women for both patches. During the study, 94/117 (80%) participants had at least one LNG concentration <180 pg/mL. Insler scores were ≥5 at least once in 102/117 (87%) of participants, and ovulation occurred at least once in 81/117 (69%). Sixty participants (51%) had at least one ovulation following an Insler score ≥5; this occurred most frequently among higher-BMI participants using the lower-dose patch (19/25, 76%).

CONCLUSIONS

Women using two investigational LNG patches did not achieve consistent concentrations of LNG >180 pg/mL, an efficacy benchmark established in other studies with LNG implants, and they experienced high rates of ovulation as well as cervical mucus scores not supportive of high contraceptive efficacy.

IMPLICATIONS

The novel LNG-only patches in this study may not adequately decrease pregnancy risk, particularly for higher-BMI women. Future studies of LNG-only contraceptive patches will need to employ higher LNG doses and assess the acceptability and safety of such dosing.

Clarification of contraceptive drug pharmacokinetics in obesity

Related to concerns about the role of obesity in the efficacy of contraceptive drugs, a review of the literature was carried out in regard to the pharmacokinetics of ethinyl estradiol and various progestins given by various routes of administration. Most studies show that obese women exhibit modestly lower plasma concentrations of these drugs (circa 30%) when given the same doses as normal-weight women. While the mechanism is uncertain, precedence in the literature suggests that this is due to body weight-related differences in metabolism rates. Confusing in some of the literature is that a few studies have reported erroneously calculated pharmacokinetic parameters after multiple dosing of oral contraceptives. A demonstration of appropriate pharmacokinetic methodology is provided.

Risks and benefits, advantages and disadvantages of levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implants

Levonorgestrel-releasing implants are long acting contraceptives, approved for 5 years of continuous use. Two marketed systems, the six capsule Norplant use of tradenames is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement. and the two rod Jadelle, have essentially equal rates of drug release, pregnancy and adverse events over 5 years of use. Randomised clinical trials and controlled cohort observations indicate that for the first 3 years, when pregnancy rates are at or almost zero, no other contraceptive system is more effective, although etonogestrel implants provide equal effectiveness. Annual pregnancy rates rise in the fifth year of continuous use but remain below 1 per 100 women. Annual pregnancy rates of Norplant users remain below 1 per 100 throughout 7 years of continuous use. Levonorgestrel implants provide low progestogen doses; 40-50 microg/day at 1 year of use, decreasing to 25-30 microg/day in the fifth year. Serum levels of levonorgestrel at 5 years are 60-65% of those levels measured at 1 month of use. Adverse effects with levonorgestrel implants are similar to those observed with progestogen only and combined oral contraceptives. Risks of ectopic pregnancy, other pregnancy complications and pelvic inflammatory disease are reduced in comparison with those of women using copper or non-medicated intrauterine devices. Risks of developing gallbladder disease and hypertension or borderline hypertension, although small, are about 1.5 and 1.8 times greater, respectively, in women using levonorgestrel implants than in women not using hormonal contraception. Other serious diseases have not been found to occur significantly more frequently in levonorgestrel implant users than in women not using hormonal contraception. The great majority of levonorgestrel implant users experience menstrual problems, but serious bleeding problems are not more frequent than in controls. Other health problems reported more frequently by levonogestrel implant users than by women not using hormonal contraception in a study of 16000 women included skin conditions, headache, upper limb neuropathies, dizziness, nervousness, malaise, minor visual disturbances, respiratory conditions, arthropathies, weight change, anxiety and non-clinical depression. Clinical depression is not more frequent in women using implants compared with those not using hormonal contraception (i.e. using intrauterine devices, sterilisation). Removal problems occur less frequently with Jadelle than with Norplant. The mean removal time for Jadelle is half that of Norplant. Levonorgestrel implants in nationally representative scientific samples, in randomised trials, and in controlled cohort studies have continuation rates as high as or higher than any other reversible contraceptive over a duration of 5 years. This would imply that the satisfaction women derive from the contraceptive effectiveness of levonorgestrel implants greatly outweighs the dissatisfaction that may accompany menstrual disturbances and other adverse effects associated with implants.

Improved approximate confidence intervals for the mean of a log-normal random variable

Data analysts often compute approximate 100 (1-alpha) per cent confidence intervals for the mean of a log-normal random variable due to the computational effort required for exact intervals. We evaluate two simple approximations and demonstrate that the probabilities with which the intervals fail to capture the population mean (that is, the coverage error) can range from well above the desired level, alpha, to very near zero in small to moderate sample sizes (n < or = 100). The performance of a more sophisticated approximation, implemented via numerical integration or bootstrap sampling, is noticeably improved, but also suffers from coverage errors that are too large when n < or = 25. A new procedure is developed which outperforms existing approximations. Computing these improved intervals requires the integration of standard distribution functions. The calculations are straightforward, however, and lead to satisfactory coverage errors for n as small as 5. A related method that avoids the integration step generally outperforms existing simple approximations for n < or = 100, while maintaining the coverage error at or below alpha. Programs to implement the new procedures are provided in an Appendix.

Contraception with two levonorgestrel rod implants. A 5-year study in the United States and Dominican Republic

A 5-year trial of a two-rod contraceptive implant, which releases the progestin levonorgestrel (LNG rod), was conducted at four clinics with 594 women. Mean age and weight at admission were 25.5 years and 62.4 kg, respectively. Consent to continue through 5 years was sought and obtained when the 3-year cumulative pregnancy rate proved to be 0.8 per 100. No pregnancies occurred in the fourth or fifth years. The 5-year cumulative pregnancy rate was, therefore, 0.8 per 100 with an annual average pregnancy rate below 2 per 1000 women. Prolonged bleeding/spotting (8.2% of subjects) and irregular bleeding (5.6%) were the most frequently cited medical reasons for removal. Removals for headache (4.7%) and weight change (4.0%) were the next most frequent medical reasons. Between 1% and 2% of subjects during the 5-year trial sought removals for each of the following conditions: mood changes, lower abdominal pain, depression, or pain at the implant site. The mean annual continuation rate during the study was 77 per 100. Use per woman averaged 2.96 years. Mean removal time was 5.9 +/- 0.6 min. These data indicate that, for a 5-year period, the two LNG rod implants are equivalent to the six Norplant capsule implants with respect to safety and efficacy parameters, but permit easier and more rapid implant removal.

Sex hormone binding globulin and free levonorgestrel index in the first week after insertion of Norplant implants

Levonorgestrel has an inhibitory effect on sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG). This decrease in SHBG leads to an increase in the free levonorgestrel index (FLI), which has a stronger biological effect. The interaction between serum levels of levonorgestrel and SHBG in long-term users of Norplant implants has been described. This study was designed to understand the same interaction immediately after the insertion of the implants, in a group of 16 women, sampled at 0 and 6 h and at 1, 3, and 7 days after Norplant implant insertion. Peak serum levonorgestrel levels were achieved at 24 h after insertion, remaining stable on day 3 and decreasing by > 10% by day 7. SHBG did not change during the first 24 h, but decreased by 19% and 60% on days 3 and 7, respectively. FLI more than doubled from day 1 to day 7 after insertion. The large decrease in SHBG and doubling of FLI is not followed by a similar reduction in levonorgestrel, which is hard to explain without an increase in the release rate of the steroid from the capsule.

First week drug concentrations in women with levonorgestrel rod or Norplant capsule implants

Forty-two healthy women volunteered to have blood samples drawn at 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, and 168 h (7 days) following placement of levonorgestrel-releasing rod (LNG rod) or of Norplant capsule implants to permit measurement of drug concentrations. Three clinics recruited 10 women each, half of whom used each type of implant. Twelve additional subjects were later enrolled at one site to provide greater detail for the capsule implants. Throughout the week, women with Norplant implants had apparently higher mean drug concentrations than did women with LNG rod implants, but the differences were significant only in the first 48 h after placement (p < 0.05). Maximum levels for capsule implants were found at the 24-h sample (mean, 1358 to 1474 pg/mL) and for the LNG rod implants at 48 h (772 pg/mL). Body weight was negatively correlated with levonorgestrel concentrations at all times (p < 0.05). For several sampling times, differences between clinics in mean concentrations were statistically significant after weight adjustment. Despite differences by implant type, weight, or clinic location, drug concentrations compatible with contraceptive effect were attained within 24 h in users of LNG rod or of Norplant implants, insofar as all women had levonorgestrel concentrations above 250 pg/mL at the 24-h sample.

A multicenter comparative study on the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of the contraceptive subdermal implants Norplant and Norplant-II

In order to assess efficacy, safety, and acceptability of the contraceptive subdermal implants Norplant and Norplant-II in Mexican women, a comparative phase III clinical trial was undertaken in eight clinics across the country. The study involved 1052 women who were followed-up trimonthly for three years. Cumulative pregnancy rates were 0.29% and 0.34% for Norplant and Norplant-II implants, respectively. Similar overall cumulative discontinuation rates were observed at three years: 50.38% for Norplant capsules, and 50.44% for Norplant-II rods. The main method-related reason for termination was endometrial bleeding irregularity which led to discontinuation rates of 11.94% and 11.62% for Norplant and Norplant-II contraceptive systems, respectively. In 15,279 woman-months of experience accumulated with Norplant implants and 14,092 with Norplant-II implants, there were few adverse events reported. No difference was found between the two groups in either difficulty for implants placement and removal or women's discomfort, even though the time required for insertion and removal of Norplant capsules was longer than for Norplant-II rods. It is concluded that during the first three years of use, both implants systems are equally effective, safe, and acceptable.

Levonorgestrel concentrations during use of levonorgestrel rod (LNG ROD) implants

In a three-year randomized trial that included 398 women, blood samples were collected for the purpose of assaying levonorgestrel concentrations in women using a new two-rod contraceptive implant system or an earlier implant formulation, Norplant-2 implants. Sample collection was at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after placement and semiannually thereafter through three years. Resulting assays and analyses showed that levonorgestrel concentrations of each implant formulation decreased significantly with time after placement, with increasing body weight, and with ponderal index. In the third year, several measures indicated that concentrations of the contraceptive drug were higher in women using the LNG ROD implants than in users of the original formulation. No pregnancies occurred among women in either group in the three years. This study provides evidence that the minimum levonorgestrel concentration needed to protect against pregnancy is below 200 pg/ml, and possibly is below 175 pg/ml.

Differential effects on bone density of progestogen-only methods for contraception in premenopausal women

The question of differential effects on bone density by two different types of progestogen-only methods for contraception in premenopausal women was addressed. Data from a prospective randomized clinical trial among 22 premenopausal women, age 32.6 (range 20-45 years), who were randomly assigned to either of two treatments with continuous progestogens for contraception were analyzed; depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) or continuous levonorgestrel treatment with subdermal implants (Norplant), respectively. Forearm bone density (BMDprox) increased with 2.94% (p = 0.006) in women who were prescribed levonorgestrel, which was in contrast to stable values in those prescribed depot-medroxy-progesterone acetate; group difference at 6 months for BMDprox 3.4% (95% CI 1.3, 5.5; p = 0.025) and BMDdist 4.1% (95% CI - 1.3, 9.6; p = 0.077). The changes in bone density were consistent with the changes in biochemical indices for bone metabolism; DMPA users showed signs of increased bone turnover and users of levonorgestrel showed increased bone formation with increased levels of both alkaline phosphatase (p = 0.004) and osteocalcin (p = 0.007). The findings suggest an increase in bone density during treatment with levonorgestrel and stable values during short-term administration of DMPA, in standard clinical doses for contraception.

Free levonorgestrel index and its relationship with luteal activity during long-term use of Norplant implants

Levonorgestrel serum levels and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) were measured in 82 women during different years of use of Norplant implants. The ratio between levonorgestrel and SHBG was calculated as an indicator of the free biologically active fraction of levonorgestrel (free levonorgestrel index, FLI). These parameters were then correlated with the presence of luteal activity, as determined by progesterone levels above 9.6 nmol/L, in a sampling run of 10 samples taken twice a week for five consecutive weeks. Levonorgestrel serum levels remained constant around 1.0 nmol/L during the five-year period. SHBG levels were below normal for the first 18 months of use, returning to normal levels during the last three years of use. The FLI in the first two years was significantly higher than that observed in the later years. The frequency of cycles with luteal activity was 12% during the first 2 years, increasing to 44% in the latter years, when FLI levels were lower. Our results suggest that the changes in SHBG and consequently in the free biologically active fraction of levonorgestrel may largely account for the differences in degree of ovarian suppression observed between the first two years of use of Norplant implants and the latter three, even in the absence of a significant variation in total levonorgestrel concentrations.

The effect of continuous subdermal levonorgestrel (Norplant) on carbohydrate metabolism

Blood glucose and plasma insulin levels during an oral glucose tolerance test were measured in 20 women using continuous subdermal levonorgestrel (Norplant) for contraception over a 12-month period. Changes in carbohydrate metabolism occurred as early as 1 month but were most marked after 6 months. After 1 month the area under the glucose and insulin curves increased by 12.3% and 37.7%, respectively. This increase was more marked by 6 months, but by 12 months it was significantly less marked. Although changes in the blood glucose and plasma insulin levels at different times during the oral glucose tolerance test occurred, they were all within normal limits for normal women. The peak blood glucose and insulin levels after insertion of the implant occurred 60 minutes after the glucose load, as opposed to 30 minutes before insertion. Apart from this, there was a significant delay in the return of these levels to fasting values. We conclude that this product, like any other progesterone-containing contraceptive, alters carbohydrate metabolism, but these alterations are not clinically significant in normal women. It is, however, possible that in potential cases of diabetes it may predispose to frank diabetes.

Microdose intravaginal levonorgestrel contraception: a multicentre clinical trial. III. The relationship between pregnancy rate and body weight. World Health Organization. Task Force on Long-Acting Systemic Agents for Fertility Regulation

This paper investigates the relationship between pregnancy rates and body weight of 1005 women using a vaginal ring releasing 20 micrograms levonorgestrel per 24 hours. While the overall pregnancy rate at one year was 3.7%, it was found that women have an increasing risk of pregnancy with increasing body weight. For example, a woman of 40 kg has an estimated pregnancy rate of 1.7% in contrast to 9.8% for a woman of 80 kg weight.

Clearance of levonorgestrel from the circulation following removal of NORPLANT subdermal implants

The disappearance of levonorgestrel from plasma after the removal of NORPLANT subdermal implants was studied in 12 women who had been treated from 5.5 to 78 months. The existence of one or two half-lives for the rate of disappearance was assessed. The influence of body weight, body fat and length of treatment upon levonorgestrel clearance was studied through stepwise regression analysis. It was found that the levonorgestrel decay rate after implant removal can be entirely accounted assuming one half-life of 42 +/- 16 h (mean +/- SD; range 13 to 62 h). Stepwise regression analysis showed that levonorgestrel half-life is positively correlated with body weight and not significantly correlated with the length of treatment or body fat. It is concluded that, after long-term administration of levonorgestrel via subdermal implants, the major part of the steroid is cleared from plasma within 96 h and that only trace amounts are detected in the following days.

Contraception with NORPLANT implants and NORPLANT-2 implants (two covered rods). Results from a comparative clinical study in Sweden

Two-hundred-and-forty healthy women, ages 18 to 40 years, were randomized in a ratio of 2:5 to use NORPLANT implants or NORPLANT-2 implants. Through three years of use, no pregnancies were recorded among women using NORPLANT implants and two pregnancies were noted among women using NORPLANT-2 implants resulting in a cumulative net pregnancy rate of 1.3 +/- 0.9 per 100 acceptors (mean +/- SE) by the end of year three. This difference was not statistically significant. During the fourth year, no pregnancies were observed in the NORPLANT group, but 4 pregnancies occurred in the NORPLANT-2 group. The most common reason for terminating the study was bleeding disturbances. During the first year there were significantly more terminations due to bleeding problems in the NORPLANT group than in the NORPLANT-2 group. However, during the second year of use the proportion of women discontinuing for bleeding problems dropped considerably among NORPLANT users and during the third year very few women in either group discontinued because of bleeding problems. The continuation rates after one year were for NORPLANT users 59.4% and for NORPLANT-2 users 77.2%. Corresponding figures after three years of use were 46.1% and 51.7%, respectively. The second most common reason for discontinuation was depression and other mood changes. In both groups we noted a slight increase in weight during the study and a slight decrease in blood pressure and hemoglobin levels with time. In conclusion, both NORPLANT and NORPLANT-2 implants are very effective methods for contraception. The efficacy of NORPLANT-2 implants, however, was not acceptable during the fourth year of use in this study. The latter system could, however, become a suitable three-year contraceptive method, possibly with less bleeding disturbances than NORPLANT in the first year.