Patterning of the head in hydra as visualized by a monoclonal antibody. I. Budding and regeneration

Plasticity of body axis polarity in Hydra regeneration under constraints

One of the major events in animal morphogenesis is the emergence of a polar body axis. Here, we combine classic grafting techniques with live imaging to explore the plasticity of polarity determination during whole body regeneration in Hydra. Composite tissues are made by fusing two rings, excised from separate animals, in different configurations that vary in the polarity and original positions of the rings along the body axes of the parent animals. Under frustrating initial configurations, body axis polarity that is otherwise stably inherited from the parent animal, can become labile and even be reversed. Importantly, the site of head regeneration exhibits a strong bias toward the edges of the tissue, even when this involves polarity reversal. In particular, we observe head formation at an originally aboral tissue edge, which is not compatible with models of Hydra regeneration based only on preexisting morphogen gradients or an injury response. The site of the new head invariably contains an aster-like defect in the organization of the supra-cellular ectodermal actin fibers. While a defect is neither required nor sufficient for head formation, we show that the defect at the new head site can arise via different routes, either appearing directly following excision as the tissue seals at its edge or through de novo defect formation at the fusion site. Altogether, our results show that the emergence of a polar body axis depends on the original polarity and position of the excised tissues as well as structural factors, suggesting that axis determination is an integrated process that arises from the dynamic interplay of multiple biochemical and mechanical processes.

Production and characterisation of cell- and tissue-specific monoclonal antibodies for the flatworm Macrostomum sp

Monoclonal antibodies (mABs) against various cell types of the basal free-living flatworm Macrostomum sp. were produced by immunising Balb/c mice with cell suspensions of disintegrated animals. We identified 360 positive supernatants with specific staining of various tissues, cell types, patterns or structures. Here we report immunocytochemical characterisation, histological stainings and isotyping of 11 mABs specific for muscle cells (MMu-1, MMu-2, MMu-3, MMu-4), digestive and prostate glands (MDr-1 and MDr-2, MPr-1), epidermal cells (MEp-1), the ventral nerve cord including neuron clusters (MNv-1), gastrodermal cells (MDa-1) and spermatids (MSp-1). Confocal microscopy, histological techniques, electron microscopy and immunoblotting were applied to demonstrate stainings in juveniles, adults, starved or well-fed animals. Considering the current lack of specific markers the obtained mABs will be particularly helpful studying embryonic and postembryonic development, pattern formation, cell differentiation, regeneration and reproductive allocation in Macrostomum sp., and possibly other basal flatworms. The small size, ease of culturing, short generation time, transparency and the basal phylogenetic position specify Macrostomum sp. as a suitable model organism for comparative analyses within Platyhelminthes and to Drosophila and C. elegans.

Head regeneration in Hydra

Hydra, a primitive metazoan, has a simple structure consisting of a head, body column, and foot aligned along a single oral-aboral axis. The body column has a high capacity for regeneration of both the head and foot. Because of the tissue dynamics that take place in adult Hydra, the processes governing axial patterning are continuously active to maintain the form of the animal. Regeneration in hydra is morphallactic and closely related to these axial patterning processes. As might be expected, analysis at the molecular level indicates that the same set of genes are involved in head regeneration and the maintenance of the head in the context of the tissue dynamics of the adult. The genes analyzed so far play roles in axial patterning processes in bilaterians.

HyBra1, a Brachyury homologue, acts during head formation in Hydra

A homologue of the T-box gene, Brachyury, has been isolated from hydra. The gene, termed HyBra1, is expressed in the endoderm and is associated with the formation of the hypostome, the apical part of the head in four different developmental situations. In adults, which are continuously undergoing patterning, HyBra1 is continuously expressed in the hypostome. During budding, hydra's asexual form of reproduction, the gene is expressed in a small area that will eventually form the hypostome of the developing bud before any morphological sign of budding is apparent. The gene is also expressed very early during head regeneration and is confined to the region that will form the hypostome. During embryogenesis, HyBra1 is expressed shortly before hatching in the region that will form the apical end of the animal, the hypostome. The absence of expression at the apical end of decapitated animals of reg-16, a head formation-deficient mutant, provides additional evidence for a role of HyBra1 during head formation. Further, treatments that alter the head activation gradient have no effect on HyBra1 expression indicating the role of the gene is confined to head formation. Transplantation experiments indicate that the expression occurs before head determination has occurred, but expression does not irreversibly commit tissue to forming a head. A comparison of the function of the Brachyury homologues suggests an evolutionary conservation of a molecular mechanism that has been co-opted for a number of developmental processes throughout evolution.

Ks1, an epithelial cell-specific gene, responds to early signals of head formation in Hydra

As a molecular marker for head specification in Hydra, we have cloned an epithelial cell-specific gene which responds to early signals of head formation. The gene, designated ks1, encodes a 217-amino acid protein lacking significant sequence similarity to any known protein. KS1 contains a N-terminal signal sequence and is rich in charged residues which are clustered in several domains. ks1 is expressed in tentacle-specific epithelial cells (battery cells) as well as in a small fraction of ectodermal epithelial cells in the gastric region subjacent to the tentacles. Treatment with the protein kinase C activator 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) causes a rapid increase in the level of ks1 mRNA in head-specific epithelial cells and also induces ectopic ks1 expression in cells of the gastric region. Sequence elements in the 5′-flanking region of ks1 that are related to TPA-responsive elements may mediate the TPA inducibility of ks1 expression. The pattern of expression of ks1 suggests that a ligand-activated diacyglycerol second messenger system is involved in head-specific differentiation.

Simultaneous effects of head activator on the dynamics of apical and basal regeneration in Hydra vulgaris (formerly Hydra attenuata)

Previous studies have demonstrated that head activator (HA), an 11 amino acid peptide, stimulates head-specific differentiation processes in hydra. Additionally, HA enhances the differentiation of interstitial cells into nerve cells. This study investigated the effects of exogenous synthetic HA on the dynamics of both apical and basal regeneration in a piece of tissue excised from the body column of treated animals which comprised one-eighth of the original animal. The dynamics of apical and basal regeneration were monitored using the monoclonal antibody TS19. This antibody binds to apical and basal ectodermal tissue very early in the process of regeneration, before morphological structures are evident. Labeling is ultimately localized to the tentacles of the head and a ring above the basal disc. Thus, TS19 is a useful tool for analyzing the dynamics of both apical and basal patterning processes in the same regenerate simultaneously. Quantification of TS19 positive areas on regenerates over a time course of 72 hr revealed that HA treatment accelerated and amplified the dynamics of both apical and basal TS19 labeling. The specific basal effect was novel and was demonstrated to occur in the absence of a determined head independently of new nerve cell differentiation. It is proposed that the basal effect was the result of growth factor-like activity of HA.

Patterning processes in aggregates of Hydra cells visualized with the monoclonal antibody, TS19

The monoclonal antibody, TS19, (Heimfeld et al., 1985), labels the apical surface of ectodermal epithelial cells of tentacles and lower peduncles in Hydra. To investigate the patterning process in a tissue whose original pattern was completely destroyed, the TS19 staining pattern was examined in developing aggregates of Hydra cells. Two types of aggregates were prepared. G-aggregates were made from tissue of the gastric portion of animals and RG-aggregates from gastric tissue allowed to regenerate for 24 hr before making aggregates. G-aggregates were initially TS19-negative, and later dim and uniformly TS19-positive. Thereafter, TS19 staining broke up into brightly stained and unstained regions. The brightly staining regions developed into head or foot structures. The TS19 pattern in RG-aggregates developed differently. Since the initial aggregates contained cells of regenerating tips, they started with TS19-positive cells as well as TS19-negative cells. The numbers of brightly staining TS19-positive cells increased with time. Some patches of these cells developed into head or foot structures, while others did not. These results and a simulation using a reaction-diffusion model suggest that the changes in activation levels affected the temporal changes in the pattern of TS19 staining, and that the de novo pattern formation in hydra can be explained in terms of a process involving activation and inhibition properties.

Effect of head activator on proliferation, head-specific determination and differentiation of epithelial cells in hydra

In hydra the differentiation of head-specific ectodermal epithelial cells from multipotent stem cells is a multistep process in which cell cycle progression is regulated at three restriction points. Head activator acts as a positive signal at these restriction points. At the G2/mitosis boundary of epithelial stem cells head activator functions as a mitogen, being necessary for cell division. Subsequently, in or before S phase, head activator acts as determinant to ensure commitment of epithelial cells to head-specific determination. This effect of head activator requires hundredfold-higher concentrations, and may also require longer incubation times, than for cell proliferation. Epithelial cells thus committed to head-specific differentiation become arrested in G2 as a third and last restriction point in the cell cycle. They require disinhibition by decapitation and probably the presence of head activator for final differentiation, which then occurs in G2.

Patterning of the head in hydra as visualized by a monoclonal antibody: III. The dynamics of head regeneration

The dynamics of the early patterning processes leading to the regeneration of a head in tissue excised from the body column of Hydra oligactis were examined by using a monoclonal antibody, CP8. This antibody displays position-specific binding, labeling the head ectodermal epithelial cells. During regeneration of a head, antibody labeling is present well before morphological signs of the head, at a time correlated with the determination of the tissue (Javois et al., Dev. Biol., 117:607-618, '86). By quantifying antibody labeling during regeneration of three different pieces of tissue excised from the body column, it was found that the dynamics of the early patterning processes as visualized by CP8 labeling varied. The pattern of labeling observed as well as the spread of labeled tissue suggested that the amount and geometry of apical tissue in the regenerate played a critical role in the patterning processes. Contrary to the labeling pattern observed in heads which formed during bud development or which regenerated following decapitation (Javois et al., '86), not all the CP8+ tissue was confined to the head structures in these regenerates. Several alternative explanations for this surprising result are presented. The usefulness of these data in refining pattern formation models by more explicitly constraining their parameters is discussed.

Terminal differentiation of ectodermal epithelial stem cells of Hydra can occur in G2 without requiring mitosis or S phase

Using bromodeoxyuridine incorporation to label cells in S phase we found that ectodermal epithelial cells of Hydra can start and complete their terminal differentiation in the G2 phase of the cell cycle. Most of the cells traversed their last S phase before the signal for differentiation, namely excision of head or foot, was given. The S phase inhibitor aphidicolin accordingly did not inhibit head or foot specific differentiation. The results show that differentiation to either head- or foot-specific ectodermal epithelial cells can start and is completed within the same G2 phase. This is therefore the first description of a complete differentiation from a population of proliferating cells to terminally differentiated, cell cycle-arrested cells without the necessity of passing through an S phase or mitosis.

Patterning of the head in hydra as visualized by a monoclonal antibody, II. The initiation and localization of head structures in regenerating pieces of tissue

The body column of hydra is polarized such that a new head will regenerate from the apical end when both extremities are removed. This is due to a graded property of the tissue termed the head activation gradient. The aim of the experiments presented here was to determine what events connect a two-dimensional segment of the activation gradient in an isolated piece of tissue with the formation of a head structure at a particular location. To this end, tissue pieces with three different shapes were excised and analyzed during and after regeneration. The most apical tissue of each piece was labeled with the DNA-intercalating dye, DAPI, and the area where developmental changes were occurring was monitored using the monoclonal antibody CP8 (Javois et al., 1986). First, it was shown that polarity of regeneration was maintained regardless of the fraction of body length included in the excised pieces. Second, while head structures usually formed from the original apical tissue, they could be located anywhere in the regenerate. This was an effect of the healing process which shaped the apical edge differently in different pieces. Third, early CP8 binding occurred in similarly shaped areas suggesting that patterning events were initiated in a contiguous manner wherever apical tissue was located. And finally, not all of the CP8-marked tissue successfully formed structures. Apparently some regions were favored to continue the patterning process, and these in turn extinguished the process in neighboring regions.

Differentiation pathways of ectodermal epithelial cells in hydra

The differentiation pathways of ectodermal epithelial cells in hydra were investigated. We found that under steady state conditions the ectodermal epithelial cells of the foot, the foot mucous cells, and the ectodermal epithelial cells of the tentacles, the battery cells, differentiate from gastric ectodermal ephithelial stem cells. From stem cell to the terminally differentiated state, a single cell cycle is required. The cells undergo a final round of DNA replication, double their genome to 4 n and become arrested in the G2-phase of the cell cycle. The ectodermal ephithelial cells of the hypostome, which like the tentacle cells are part of the head structure, can also arise from gastric ectodermal epithelial stem cells, but do so only during head regeneration and budding. They differentiate from stem cell to hypostomal cell in a single cell cycle, but in contrast to foot mucous and battery cells they remain capable of cell proliferation. Due to this self-renewal potential, they do not require recruitment from the gastric stem-cell pool in steady-state animals.