Evidence from behavioural and in vitro receptor binding studies that the enkephalinergic system does not mediate acute ethanol effects

Delta Opioid Pharmacology in Relation to Alcohol Behaviors

Delta opioid receptors (DORs) are heavily involved in alcohol-mediated processes in the brain. In this chapter we provide an overview of studies investigating how alcohol directly impacts DOR pharmacology and of early studies indicating DOR modulation of alcohol behavior. We will offer a brief summary of the different animal species used in alcohol studies investigating DORs followed by a broader overview of the types of alcohol behaviors modulated by DORs. We will highlight a small set of studies investigating the relationship between alcohol and DORs in analgesia. We will then provide an anatomical overview linking DOR expression in specific brain regions to different alcohol behaviors. In this section, we will provide two models that try to explain how endogenous opioids acting at DORs may influence alcohol behaviors. Next, we will provide an overview of studies investigating certain new aspects of DOR pharmacology, including the formation of heteromers and biased signaling. Finally, we provide a short overview of the genetics of the DORs in relation to alcohol use disorders (AUDs) and a short statement on the potential of using DOR-based therapeutics for treatment of AUDs.

Analgesic effect of tianeptine in mice

The effects of tianeptine, a novel and unusual tricyclic antidepressant drug, on tail-flick and hot-plate tests, which are two thermal analgesia evaluating methods, have been investigated in mice. Tianeptine (5 and 10 mg/kg), para-chlorophenylalanine (pCPA) (100 mg/kg) and a combination of pCPA and tianeptine (10 mg/kg) or saline were injected to mice intraperitoneally. pCPA (100 mg/kg) was injected 24 h before tianeptine or saline treatment when it was combined with tinaeptine (10 mg/kg) or tested alone. The tail-flick latencies and hot-plate reaction times of the mice were measured between 15th and 180th minutes following injections. Tianeptine (10 mg/kg) exhibited a significant antinociceptive activity that could be measured by both tests as compared to groups which were treated with saline or pCPA alone between 15th and 180th min of the observation period. The lower dose of tianeptine (5 mg/kg) or pCPA (100 mg/kg) did not produce any significant changes on tail-flick latency or hot-plate reaction time of the mice. However, pretreatment with pCPA completely blocked the antinociceptive effect induced by tianeptine (10 mg/kg) in both tests used in the present study. Furthermore, tianeptine (10 mg/kg) did not cause any significant impairment effects on rotarod performance of the mice. Our results suggested that tianeptine has a prominent thermal antinociceptive activity in mice and that increased serotonergic activity may be responsible for the analgesic effect of tianeptine.

Low-dose effect of ethanol on locomotor activity induced by activation of the mesolimbic system

Four experiments were designed to study the ability of 0.5 g/kg ethanol (EtOH) intraperitoneally to modify locomotor activity induced by drugs that interact with different sites in the mesolimbic system (MLS) of male Sprague-Dawley rats. Locomotor activity was measured in a doughnut-shaped circular arena after various treatments. EtOH alone did not alter locomotor activity in any of the experiments. Amphetamine (AMP, intraperitoneally or intraaccumbens) increased locomotor activity in a dose-dependent manner, and the presence of EtOH attenuated AMP-induced locomotor activity. Bilateral infusion of GABAA antagonist picrotoxin (PIC) into the ventral tegmental area also increased locomotor activity in a dose-dependent manner, and the presence of EtOH attenuated PIC-induced locomotor activity. On the other hand, the interaction between bilateral infusion of mu-receptor agonist Tyr-D-Ala-Gly-NMe-Phe-Gly-ol (DAGO) and EtOH on locomotor activity is complex. The highest dose of DAGO that significantly increased locomotor activity was not affected by the presence of EtOH. But, with lower doses of DAGO that either had no effect or a small increase in locomotor activity, the combination of EtOH and DAGO increased and attenuated locomotor activity, respectively. Results from this study support our hypothesis that a low dose of EtOH that does not modify behavior can interact with neurotransmitter systems in the brain and modify drug-induced locomotor activity. Modification of this drug-induced locomotor activity by a low dose of EtOH is dependent on the rate of ongoing locomotor behavior induced by drug and the neurotransmitter substrate that the drug modified to induce locomotor behavior.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Inhibition of clonic seizure-like excitatory effects induced by intrathecal morphine using two NMDA receptor antagonists: MK-801 and ACEA-1011

Microinjection of high doses of morphine into the spinal lumbar intrathecal (i.t.) space of mice produces dose-dependent clonic seizure-like excitatory effects. Naloxone, an opioid antagonist (10 mg/kg, i.p.), injected 5 min prior to i.t. morphine, did not reverse the seizure-like motor effects, suggesting that these effects of morphine are not mediated through opioid receptors. Systemic administration of MK-801, a non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist (0.01-0.10 mg/kg, i.p.), or ACEA-1011, a novel NMDA receptor/glycine site antagonist (0.5-20.0 mg/kg, i.p.), attenuated the clonic seizure-like excitatory effects induced by i.t. morphine in a dose-dependent manner. Sensorimotor performance of the mice was evaluated using the rotarod test. Although both compounds (MK-801 and ACEA-1011) impaired the sensorimotor performance of mice in a dose-dependent fashion, there was no impairment of motor performance at doses employed to block the excitatory effects induced by i.t. morphine. These data suggest that NMDA receptors play a pivotal role in the clonic seizure-like behaviors induced by i.t. morphine.

Enkephalins interfere with early phases of voluntary ethanol drinking

The relationship between the opiate peptides Leu-enkephalin and [D-Ala2-Met5]enkephalinamide (DAME) and the initial expression and maintenance of ethanol preference was studied in male Wistar rats. Subcutaneous administration of both peptides prior to the first choice test between water and ethanol induced reductions on ethanol intake and subsequently on total fluid intake. Leu-enkephalin treatment also diminished ethanol preference in the day of treatment and in consecutive days. Neither Leu-enkephalin nor DAME treatments modified rats sucrose preference or intake. The results suggest that the enkephalins studied, when administered in the early phases of ethanol preference, interfere with the mechanisms involved in the propensity to drink ethanol.

Ethanol and opioid receptor signalling

Ethanol may modulate endogenous opioid systems by disrupting opioid receptor signalling. Low concentrations of ethanol slightly potentiate mu-opioid receptor binding by increasing receptor Bmax, and, in some cases, chronic ethanol exposure decreases the density or affinity of the mu-opioid receptors. By contrast, high concentrations of ethanol acutely decrease delta-opioid receptor binding by decreasing receptor affinity, whereas chronic exposure of animals and neuronal cell lines to lower concentrations of ethanol leads to possibly adaptive increases in the density or affinity of the delta-opioid receptors. In the neuronal cell line NG108-15, ethanol does not up-regulate the delta-opioid receptor by blocking receptor degradation or endocytosis, but protein synthesis is required for this response. Up-regulation of the delta-opioid receptor renders ethanol-treated NG108-15 cells 3.5-fold more sensitive to opioid inhibition of adenylyl cyclase. Long-term treatment with ethanol also increases maximal opioid inhibition in NG108-15 cells, possibly by decreasing levels of G alpha s and its mRNA. Ethanol differentially modulates signal transduction proteins in three additional neuronal cell lines, N18TG2, N4TG1, and N1E-115. Ethanol-treated N18TG2 cells show the least up-regulation of the delta-opioid receptor, little heterologous desensitization of adenylyl cyclase, and no changes in G alpha s or G alpha i. By contrast, ethanol-treated N1E-115 cells show the largest up-regulation of the delta-opioid receptor, the most heterologous desensitization of adenylyl cyclase, and concentration-dependent decreases in G alpha s and increases in G alpha i. Further analysis of these related neuronal cell lines may help to identify the molecular elements that endow some, but not all, neuronal cells with the capacity to adapt to ethanol.

Selective effects of ethanol on opiate receptor subtypes in brain

Large concentrations of ethanol in vitro decreased ligand binding to mu and delta opiate receptors in the frontal cortex of the C57BL mouse, but did not alter binding to kappa opiate receptors. Mu and delta receptors were equally sensitive to the inhibitory effect of ethanol. Since the effects of ethanol were significant only in large concentrations, ethanol may alter opiate binding through its membrane lipid-perturbing actions, and the selectivity of the effects of ethanol may reflect differences in the microenvironments of the opiate receptor subtypes in membranes. After chronic ingestion of ethanol by mice, in vivo, there was a selective decrease in the number of mu receptors in the frontal cortex. This change may result from indirect effects of ethanol on the opiate receptor and may contribute to specific central effects of ethanol.

The effect of diazepam on nociception in mice

The antinociceptive properties of diazepam were evaluated in mice, using four different pain tests and different doses of the drug (0.2, 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 mg/kg). In the tail flick test and the increasing temperature hot plate test there were no effects. In the formalin test reduced licking was observed for the highest dose of diazepam. However, this dose also induced clear sedation possibly causing the reduced licking response. In the constant temperature hot plate test a hyperalgesia was found for all doses tested. This hyperalgesia was not observed in animals adapted to the test apparatus, suggesting that the "hyperalgesic" effect of diazepam may be due to reduced stress analgesia. The serum concentrations of the drug were comparable to therapeutic levels in humans. It was concluded that the sedative and anxiolytic effects of diazepam may influence the results of nociceptive tests, but the drug has probably no effect on nociception in itself.