Role of positions 9 and 10 in the endothelin molecule for biological activity and discrimination of receptor subtypes

Refractoriness to the effect of endothelin-1 in porcine ciliary arteries

PURPOSE

Endothelin-1 (ET) is an important molecule in vascular physiology. After an acute stimulation with ET, vessels are to some extent temporarily refractory to further stimulation. However, few details are known about this phenomenon. The aim of our study was to verify the existence of refractoriness in ophthalmic ciliary arteries and, if present, to analyze its time course.

METHODS

Twenty freshly isolated porcine ciliary arteries were placed in a myograph system to measure isometric forces. Each vessel was stimulated with 10(-7) M ET twice. The experiment was performed in 5 groups of vessels, which differed in the time interval between the initial and the second stimulation with ET. The intervals were 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 4 h, respectively.

RESULTS

The vasoconstrictive response to re-exposure to ET was time-dependently reduced. The response was lowest after 15 min (22% of baseline response), and then the sensitivity slowly recovered and was finally normal again after 4 h.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experiment with isolated porcine ophthalmic ciliary arteries revealed a refractoriness phase to ET after an acute stimulation with ET. This refractoriness was transient and disappeared after 4 h. The lowest response was observed in the group of vessels re-exposed 15 min after the first stimulation.

Development of fetal vascular responses to endothelin-1 and acetylcholine in the sheep

Responses to K(+), endothelin-1 (ET-1), and acetylcholine (ACh) of isolated adrenal, femoral, middle cerebral, and renal arteries from fetal [110--145 days gestational age (dGA, term approximately 148 dGA)] and 0- to 24-h newborn (NB) lambs were evaluated using the technique of wire myography. Responses at distinct developmental ages for each vascular bed were compared. In all arteries sensitivity to K(+)-induced vasoconstriction was similar at all fetal age points examined. In contrast, sensitivity to ET-1 increased with increasing fetal age in arteries from all vascular beds. The magnitude of the maximal vasoconstriction was positively correlated with GA for K(+) in adrenal, femoral, and cerebral arteries and for ET-1 in femoral, cerebral, and renal arteries. Cerebral arteries showed a greater sensitivity when compared with the other systemic arteries to K(+) and ET-1 at all fetal ages and to K(+) in NB. ACh evoked relaxatory responses in fetal and NB femoral and adrenal arteries. However, renal arteries relaxed comparatively less in response to ACh, and no vasodilation was noted in middle cerebral arteries at any age points examined. For femoral arteries ACh-induced vasorelaxation decreased with increasing GA but was restored in arteries from NB lambs. In summary, the responsiveness of isolated resistance arteries varies with developmental age in the fetal and perinatal sheep and these effects are both agonist and vascular bed specific. The augmented sensitivity in response to ET-1 of middle cerebral compared with other systemic arteries may reflect the importance of cerebral blood flow control during this critical developmental period.

Molecular modeling of the complex of endothelin-1 (ET-1) with the endothelin type A (ET(A)) receptor and the rational design of a peptide antagonist

ET-1 is the most potent vasoconstrictor known to date, causing vasoconstriction when bound to the ET(A) receptor. Inhibitors of the binding of ET-1 to the ET(A) receptor would be of immense value as potential therapeutic agents in the treatment of cardiovascular disorders such as angina and hypertension. We present here the rational design of such an inhibitor, which is arrived at on the basis of a model of the ET-1/ET(A) receptor complex proposed by us. The model is found to be consistent with binding and mutagenesis studies of ET-1 as well as of BQ123, a known, potent ET(A)-selective antagonist which competes with ET-1 for receptor binding. BQ123 is a peptidic antagonist which is constrained to adopt a definite conformation on account of its cyclic nature. The noncyclic peptide antagonist designed by us also has a unique conformation because it contains two dehydro-Alanine (deltaAla) residues which, on account of their planarity, cause the peptide backbone to bend in a specific and predictable manner. The folding rules for peptides containing deltaAla were derived in our earlier studies. Energy minimization and modelling of the complex of the designed peptide with the ET(A) receptor indicate that the antagonist is ET(A)-selective and the binding is more stable and more specific as compared to that of BQ123.

Effects of endothelin ET(B) receptor agonists and antagonists on the biphasic response in the ileum

In the guinea-pig ileum, both sarafotoxin S6c and IRL1620 (Suc-[Glu9,Ala11,15]endothelin-1-(8-21) induced a concentration-dependent biphasic effect (relaxation and contraction), but distinct tachyphylaxis of the tissue. Cross-tachyphylaxis and additivity experiments evidenced distinct receptors for these agonists. BQ-123 (cyclo[D-Trp-D-Asp-Pro-D-Val-Leu]), an endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonist, did not affect the response induced by either agonist. PD145065 [Ac-(D-Bhg-Leu-Asp-Ile-Ile-Trp) (D-Bhg = 5H-dibenzyl[a,d]cycloheptene-10,11-dihydroglycine)], an endothelin ET(A)/ET(B) receptor antagonist, inhibited the contractions induced by IRL1620 and sarafotoxin S6c in competitive and noncompetitive manner, respectively. RES-701-1 [cyclic(Gly1-Asp9)(Gly-Asn-Trp-His-Gly-Thr-Ala-Pro-Asp-Trp-P he-Phe-Asn-Tyr-Tyr-Trp)], an endothelin ET(B1) receptor antagonist, inhibited both components of the response induced by IRL1620, whereas it inhibited mainly the relaxation induced by low sarafotoxin S6c doses. Apamin and suramin had different effects towards the agonists. Our results suggest that two endothelin ET(B) receptors with distinct signal transduction mechanism mediate the biphasic response: (1) the endothelin ET(B1) receptor: sensitive to RES-701-1 and PD145065 and (2) the endothelin ET(B2) receptor: less sensitive to RES-701-1 and PD145065.

Distinct endothelin-B receptors mediate the effects of sarafotoxin S6c and IRL1620 in the ileum

In the guinea pig ileum, both sarafotoxin S6c (S6c) and IRL1620 induced a biphasic effect (relaxation and contraction). S6c induced strong tachyphylaxis of both components of the response, but IRL1620 induced tachyphylaxis mainly of the contractile component. Whereas the tissues rendered tachyphylactic to S6c did not respond to IRL1620, a normal biphasic response to S6c was observed in the tissues rendered tachyphylactic to IRL1620. In the presence of IRL1620, S6c could induce its biphasic effect, whereas in the presence of S6c, IRL1620 was ineffective. BQ-123, a specific ETA antagonist, did not affect the biphasic response induced by either agonist. PD145065, a potent ETA/ETB antagonist, was a competitive and a noncompetitive antagonist, respectively, of the contractile components of IRL1620 and S6c. RES-701-1, a specific ETB1 antagonist, inhibited both components of the response induced by IRL1620. However, it inhibited mainly the relaxant component induced by low doses of S6c. Apamin had different effects on endothelin-1 (ET-1), S6c, and IRL1620. Our results suggest that there are at least two distinct populations of ETB receptors mediating the biphasic response: the ETB1 receptor, sensitive to RES-701-1 and PD145065, and the ETB2 receptor, less sensitive to RES-701-1 and PD145065.