Apparent complete lower esophageal sphincter relaxation in achalasia

Atypical presentations and pitfalls of achalasia

Achalasia is a rare disease with significant diagnostic delay and association with false diagnoses and unnecessary interventions. It remains unclear, whether atypical presentations, misinterpreted symptoms or inconclusive diagnostics are the cause. The aim of this study was the characterization of typical and atypical features of achalasia and their impact on delays, misinterpretations or false diagnoses. A retrospective analysis of prospective database over a period of 30 years was performed. Data about symptoms, delays and false diagnoses were obtained and correlated with manometric, endoscopic and radiologic findings. Totally, 300 patients with achalasia were included. Typical symptoms (dysphagia, regurgitation, weight loss and retrosternal pain) were present in 98.7%, 88%, 58.4% and 52.4%. The mean diagnostic delay was 4.7 years. Atypical symptoms were found in 61.7% and led to a delay of 6 months. Atypical gastrointestinal symptoms were common (43%), mostly 'heartburn' (16.3%), 'vomiting' (15.3%) or belching (7.7%). A single false diagnosis occurred in 26%, multiple in 16%. Major gastrointestinal misdiagnoses were GERD in 16.7% and eosinophilic esophagitis in 4%. Other false diagnosis affected ENT-, psychiatric, neurologic, cardiologic or thyroid diseases. Pitfalls were the description of 'heartburn' or 'nausea'. Tertiary contractions at barium swallows, hiatal hernias and 'reflux-like' changes at endoscopy or eosinophils in the biopsies were misleading. Atypical symptoms are common in achalasia, but they are not the sole source for diagnostic delays. Misleading descriptions of typical symptoms or misinterpretation of diagnostic studies contribute to false diagnoses and delays.

Relationship between dysphagia, lower esophageal sphincter relaxation, and esophagogastric junction distensibility

BACKGROUND

It is debated whether high-resolution manometric (HRM) integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) or functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) distensibility index (DI) is the superior measure of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) opening. We examined the relationship between the DI and IRP and assessed correlations with dysphagia symptoms in patients with achalasia and EGJ outflow obstruction (EGJOO).

METHODS

Patients with achalasia and those with barium tablet retention at the EGJ were grouped as follows: Group 1:Achalasia (IRP ≥ 15 mmHg + complete absence of normal peristalsis); Group 2: Manometric +FLIP EGJOO (IRP ≥ 15 mmHg with some intact peristalsis + DI ≤ 2.8 mm2 /mmHg); Group 3: Abnormal DI only (DI ≤ 2.8 mm2 /mmHg + IRP <15 mmHg); and Group 4: Normal IRP and DI (IRP ≥ 15 mmHg + DI > 2.8 mm2 /mmHg). Correlation between the DI, baseline lower esophageal sphincter pressure (BLESP), IRP, and dysphagia (Eckardt score) was assessed. Multivariable analysis was used to assess variables associated with dysphagia score ≥2.

KEY RESULTS

A total of 79 patients were included: Group 1 (n = 31), Group 2 (n = 33), Group 3 (n = 14), and Group 4 (n = 1). DI did not correlate with BLESP or IRP in the whole sample or subgroups. DI was the only variable associated with dysphagia score ≥2 (p = 0.006). DI < 1.25 mm2 /mmHg had sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 52% (p = 0.0003) for dysphagia score ≥2.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

DI does not correlate with HRM EGJ measurements and is the metric with the strongest effect on dysphagia severity. The various biological elements that may cause restrictive EGJ function should be the subject of future studies.

Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM)

BACKGROUND

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is gaining traction as a minimally invasive treatment of achalasia. Increased reflux is reported after POEM but the incidence, type and severity of reflux are not fully understood. We aimed to study the prevalence and nature of reflux after POEM and correlate reflux with endoscopy and pH-impedance findings.

METHODS

This is a prospective cohort study of achalasia patients undergoing POEM since 2014. Data from Eckardt and GERD symptom scores, high-resolution oesophageal manometry (HRM) and gastroscopy were performed pre-procedure and repeated at 1-year follow-up. Data from 24-h pH-impedance, if performed, were also recorded. A standardized questionnaire was used to determine the severity and frequency of heartburn symptoms and the composite score for each patient was calculated.

RESULTS

58 patients underwent POEM between January 2014 and October 2018. The efficacy of POEM at 1 year was 93.0%. We observed reduction of median Integrated Relaxation Pressure (IRP) from 23.5 ± 33.1 mmHg to 13.4 ± 7.71 mmHg (p = 0.005) and mean Eckardt score improved from 6.09 ± 2.43 points to 1.16 ± 1.70 points (p < 0.001). At 1 year, 43.1% (n = 25) had symptomatic reflux. Of the 40 patients who underwent repeated gastroscopy, 60.0% (n = 24) had endoscopic evidence of oesophagitis with seven patients (18%) diagnosed with Grade C or D oesophagitis. 43.1% (n = 25) of patients had pH-impedance done post-POEM off PPIs. 14 patients (56%) had increased acid exposure. Sixteen percent of reflux episodes were acidic and 77.3% were weakly acidic.

CONCLUSION

POEM was an effective treatment for achalasia. However, GERD was common after POEM with incidence of 43% on symptom score, 60% on endoscopy and 56% on pH-impedance test. Post-POEM reflux appeared to be predominantly acidic in nature. Routine surveillance for GERD after POEM is recommended.

Assessment of esophageal body peristaltic work using functional lumen imaging probe panometry

The goal of this study was to conceptualize and compute measures of "mechanical work" done by the esophagus using data generated during functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) panometry and compare work done during secondary peristalsis among patients and controls. Eighty-five individuals were evaluated with a 16-cm FLIP during sedated endoscopy, including asymptomatic controls (n = 14) and those with achalasia subtypes I, II, and III (n = 15, each); gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD; n = 13); eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE; n = 9); and systemic sclerosis (SSc; n = 5). The FLIP catheter was positioned to have its distal segment straddling the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) during stepwise distension. Two metrics of work were assessed: "active work" (during bag volumes ≤ 40 mL where contractility generates substantial changes in lumen area) and "work capacity" (for bag volumes ≥ 60 mL when contractility cannot substantially alter the lumen area). Controls showed median [interquartile range (IQR)] of 7.3 (3.6-9.2) mJ of active work and 268.6 (225.2-332.3) mJ of work capacity. Patients with all achalasia subtypes, GERD, and SSc showed lower active work done than controls (P ≤ 0.003). Patients with achalasia subtypes I and II, GERD, and SSc had lower work capacity compared with controls (P < 0.001, 0.004, 0.04, and 0.001, respectively). Work capacity was similar between controls and patients with achalasia type III and EoE. Mechanical work of the esophagus differs between healthy controls and patient groups with achalasia, EoE, SSc, and GERD. Further studies are needed to fully explore the utility of this approach, but these work metrics would be valuable for device design (artificial esophagus), to measure the efficacy of peristalsis, to gauge the physiological state of the esophagus, and to comment on its pumping effectiveness.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) panometry assesses esophageal response to distension and provides a simultaneous assessment of pressure and dimension during contractility. This enables an objective assessment of "mechanical work" done by the esophagus. Eighty-five individuals were evaluated, and two work metrics were computed for each subject. Controls showed greater values of work compared with individuals with achalasia, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and systemic sclerosis (SSc). These values can quantify the mechanical behavior of the distal esophagus and assist in the estimation of muscular integrity.

Characteristics of a Subset of Achalasia With Normal Integrated Relaxation Pressure

Background/Aims

Integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) is a critical diagnostic criterion to define achalasia. However, there are some cases with typical symptoms and signs of achalasia but with normal IRP. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical characteristics of patients with achalasia with normal IRP and outcomes after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM).

Methods

Patients with achalasia were collected in whom POEM was performed from November 2014 to April 2018 at CHA Bundang Medical Center. Achalasia with normal IRP was defined by findings compatible to achalasia in Eckardt score, endoscopy with endoscopic ultrasound, high-resolution manometry, impedance planimetry (EndoFlip), and timed esophagogram.

Results

POEM was performed in 89 patients with achalasia; among them, 24 (27%) patients were diagnosed with achalasia with normal IRP. Patients with achalasia with normal IRP were older, had longer duration of symptom, and had a more tortuous esophagus. In EndoFlip, the distensibility index and cross-sectional area were higher in patients with normal IRP. Therapeutic outcomes showed no statistically significant differences. On correlation analysis, IRP had negative correlations with age, disease duration, and distensibility index.

Conclusions

Patients with achalasia of normal IRP value were older and had longer disease duration and higher distensibility index and cross-sectional area than patients with achalasia with abnormal relaxation of lower esophageal sphincter. Therapeutic outcomes were not different between the 2 groups.

Mast cell infiltration associated with loss of interstitial cells of Cajal and neuronal degeneration in achalasia

BACKGROUND

Achalasia is a motility disorder of unknown etiology. Previous studies supported the hypothesis that autoimmune-mediated inflammatory responses produce inhibitory neuronal degeneration. This study was designed to explore the role of mast cells in achalasia.

METHODS

We collected information from 116 patients with achalasia who underwent peroral endoscopic myotomy between December 2016 and May 2017. Lower esophageal sphincter (LES) muscle biopsy was performed in all patients with achalasia, as well as 20 control subjects. The number of mast cells, interstitial cells of Cajal (ICCs), nNOS-positive cells, and S-100-positive cells in the LES were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Pathological and clinical data were compared between groups.

KEY RESULTS

Compared with controls, the LES of patients with achalasia had significantly fewer ICCs, nNOS-positive cells, and S-100-positive cells and a higher number of mast cells (all P < 0.001). Furthermore, the increased mast cell infiltration was significantly associated with decreased ICCs, nNOS-positive cells, and S-100-positive cells in patients with achalasia (all P < 0.05). Clinically, the number of strongly positive mast cells was highest in patients with type I achalasia and lowest in those with type III achalasia (P < 0.001). In addition, patients with a history of autoimmune disease or viral infection had greater mast cell infiltration in the LES muscle (P = 0.040).

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

In patients with achalasia, mast cell infiltration in the LES muscle is increased, in association with loss of ICCs and neuronal degeneration. Mast cells may thereby play a crucial role in the development of achalasia.

Ten Questions About Barium Esophagography and Dysphagia

The barium esophagogram is a global test for patients with dysphagia that can simultaneously detect morphologic abnormalities in the pharynx and esophagus, pharyngeal swallowing dysfunction, esophageal dysmotility, and gastroesophageal reflux. The barium esophagram is an inexpensive, noninvasive, and widely available procedure that can serve as the initial diagnostic test for dysphagia and facilitate selection of other diagnostic studies such as endoscopy. This article addresses 10 questions about barium esophagography and dysphagia that should help gastroenterologists gain a better perspective about the utility of barium studies in this clinical setting.

NORMATIVE VALUES FOR A NEW WATER-PERFUSED HIGH RESOLUTION MANOMETRY SYSTEM

BACKGROUND

Esophageal manometry is the most reliable method to evaluate esophageal motility. High resolution manometry (HRM) provides topographic contour colored plots (Clouse Plots) with simultaneous analysis from the pharynx to the stomach. Both solid state and water-perfused systems are available.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to determinate the normative data for a new water-perfused HRM.

METHODS

HRM was made in 32 healthy volunteers after 8 hours fasting. HRM system used consisted of a 24-channel water-perfused catheter (Multiplex, Alacer Biomedica, São Paulo, Brazil). The reusable catheter is made of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) with 4.7 mm of diameter. Side holes connected to pressure transducers are spaced 2 cm for the analysis from the pharynx to the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). Holes are spaced 5 mm and 120° in a spiral disposition in the LES area. The sensors encompass 34 cm in total. Upper esophageal sphincter (UES) parameters studied were basal and relaxation pressures. Esophageal body parameters were distal contractile integral (DCI), distal latency (DL) and break. LES parameters studied were basal pressure, integrated residual pressure (IRP), total and abdominal length. Variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation, median (interquartile range) and percentiles 5-95th.

RESULTS

All volunteers (17 males, aged 22-62 years) completed the study and tolerated the HRM procedure well. Percentiles 5-95th range were calculated: Upper Esophageal Sphincter (UES) basal pressure 16.7-184.37 (mmHg), DL: 6.2-9.1 (s), DCI: 82.72-3836.61 (mmHg.s.cm), break: <7.19 (cm), LES basal pressure: 4.89-37.16 (mmHg), IRP: 0.55-15.45 (mmHg).

CONCLUSION

The performance and normative values obtained for this low-cost water-perfused HRM seems to be adequate for clinical use.

A PICTORIAL PRESENTATION OF ESOPHAGEAL HIGH RESOLUTION MANOMETRY CURRENT PARAMETERS

Introduction:

High resolution manometry is the current technology used to the study of esophageal motility and is replacing conventional manometry in important centers for esophageal motility with parameters used on esophageal motility, following the Chicago Classification. This classification unifies high resolution manometry interpretation and classifies esophageal disorders.

Objective:

This review shows, in a pictorial presentation, the new parameters established by the Chicago Classification, version 3.0, aimed to allow an easy comprehension and interpretation of high resolution manometry.

Methods:

Esophageal manometries performed by the authors were reviewed to select illustrative tracings representing Chicago Classification parameters.

Results:

The parameters are: Esophagogastric Morphology, that classifies this junction according to its physiology and anatomy; Integrated Relaxation Pressure, that measures the lower esophageal sphincter relaxation; Distal Contractile Integral, that evaluates the contraction vigor of each wave; and, Distal Latency, that measures the peristalsis velocity from the beginning of the swallow to the epiphrenic ampulla.

Conclusion:

Clinical applications of these new concepts is still under evaluation.

Is Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Achalasia Coincident or Not?

Achalasia and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are on opposite ends of the spectrum of lower esophageal sphincter dysfunction. Heartburn is the main symptom of GERD. However, heartburn and regurgitation are frequently observed in patients who have achalasia. The diagnosis of achalasia might be delayed because these symptoms are misinterpreted as gastroesophageal reflux. Here, we reviewed the clinical characteristics of patients with the erroneous diagnosis of GERD who actually had untreated achalasia.

Esophagogastric junction distensibility identifies achalasia subgroup with manometrically normal esophagogastric junction relaxation

BACKGROUND

Manometric criteria to diagnose achalasia are absent peristalsis and incomplete relaxation of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ), determined by an integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) >15 mm Hg. However, EGJ relaxation seems normal in a subgroup of patients with typical symptoms of achalasia, no endoscopic abnormalities, stasis on timed barium esophagogram (TBE), and absent peristalsis on high-resolution manometry (HRM). The aim of our study was to further characterize these patients by measuring EGJ distensibility and assessing the effect of achalasia treatment.

METHODS

Impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP) was used to measure EGJ distensibility and compared to previous established data of 15 healthy subjects. In case the EGJ distensibility was impaired, achalasia treatment followed. Eckardt score, HRM, TBE, and EGJ distensibility measurements were repeated >3 months after treatment.

KEY RESULTS

We included 13 patients (5 male; age 19-59 years) with typical symptoms of achalasia, Eckardt score of 7 (5-7). High-resolution manometry showed absent peristalsis with low basal EGJ pressure of 10 (5.8-12.9) mm Hg and IRP of 9.3 (6.1-12) mm Hg. Esophageal stasis was 4.6 (2.7-6.9) cm after 5 minutes. Esophagogastric junction distensibility was significantly reduced in patients compared to healthy subjects (0.8 [0.7-1.2] mm² /mm Hg vs 6.3 [3.8-8.7] mm² /mm Hg). Treatment significantly improved the Eckardt score (7 [5-7] to 2 [1-3.5]) and EGJ distensibility (0.8 [0.7-1.2] mm² /mm Hg to 3.5 [1.5-6.1] mm² /mm Hg).

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

A subgroup of patients with clinical and radiological features of achalasia but manometrically normal EGJ relaxation has an impaired EGJ distensibility and responds favorably to achalasia treatment. Our data suggest that this condition can be considered as achalasia and treated as such.

The Impact of Heller Myotomy on Integrated Relaxation Pressure in Esophageal Achalasia

BACKGROUND

A new high-resolution manometry (HRM) parameter, the integrated relaxation pressure (IRP), has been proposed for the assessment of esophageal-gastric junction (EGJ) relaxation. Our aim was to assess the effect of Heller myotomy on IRP in achalasia patients.

METHODS

We prospectively collected data on achalasia patients who underwent HRM between 2009-2014. Barium swallow was used to assess esophageal diameter and shape. Manometric diagnoses were performed by using the Chicago Classification v3. All patients with a confirmed diagnosis of achalasia were treated surgically with Heller Myotomy

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-nine consecutive achalasia patients (M:F = 72:67) represented the study population. All the patients had 100% simultaneous waves but 11 had an IRP < 15 mmHg. At median follow-up of 28 months, the median of IRP was significantly lower after surgery (27.4 [IQR 20.4-35] vs 7.1 [IQR 4.4-9.8]; p < 0.001), and so were the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) resting pressure (27 [IQR 18-33] vs 6 [IQR 3-11]; p < 0.001). At univariate analysis, IRP correlated with the gender, LES resting residual pressure, and dysphagia score.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to have examined the role of IRP in achalasia, and how it changes after surgical treatment. An increased preoperative IRP correlated directly with a more severe dysphagia. The IRP was restored to normal by Heller myotomy.

Achalasia: new perspectives on an old disease

Achalasia is defined by esophageal outflow obstruction from abnormal relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) due to deranged inhibitory control. In genetically predisposed individuals, an autoimmune response to an unknown inciting agent, perhaps a viral infection, results in inflammation and sometimes loss of myenteric plexus ganglia and neurons. The net result is varying degrees of inhibitory dysfunction, at times associated with imbalanced and exaggerated excitatory function, with manometrically distinct achalasia phenotypes on high resolution manometry. There is new evidence in the current issue of this Journal suggesting that type 1 achalasia, with esophageal outflow obstruction and absent esophageal body contractility, is an end-stage phenotype from progression of type 2 achalasia, which is characterized by panesophageal compartmentalization of pressure in the untreated patient, and partial recovery of peristalsis after treatment. Esophageal outflow obstruction with premature peristalsis (type 3 achalasia) or intact peristalsis may result from plexitis in the myenteric plexus but can also be encountered in other settings including chronic opioid medication usage and structural processes at the esophagogastric junction and distally. In most instances when idiopathic esophageal outflow obstruction is confirmed, some form of pharmacologic manipulation or disruption of the LES provides durable symptom relief. This review will focus on current understanding of pathophysiology, diagnosis, and principles of management of achalasia in light of emerging literature on the topic.

High-resolution manometry in diagnosis and treatment of achalasia: help or hype

High-resolution manometry (HRM) with 36 pressure transducers spanning the esophagus has revolutionized the diagnosis and treatment of esophageal motility disorders, especially with respect to achalasia. The three major contributions of HRM are as follows: (a) Integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) at the esophagus gastric junction (EGJ) >15 mmHg has a sensitivity of 97 % for the diagnosis of achalasia; (b) there are three distinct subtypes of achalasia - type 1 (no distal pressurization), type II (panesophageal pressurization), and type III (spastic contractions); and (c) subtypes predict the success of treatment with type II patients doing the best and type III being the most difficult to treat. Recent studies also suggest that HRM is superior to conventional manometry for diagnosis of achalasia. Other useful observation from HRM is the recognition of EGJ outflow obstruction (type IV achalasia) with normal peristalsis which may be due to mechanical or functional impairment at the EGJ. Finally, after successful treatment of achalasia, the IRP falls to less than 15 mmHg and the achalasia pressurization pattern resolves sometimes with the return of weak peristalsis. This complements well with the information obtained by the timed barium esophagram.

Evaluation of esophagogastric junction relaxation by 4-second Integrated Relaxation Pressure in achalasia using High Resolution Manometry with water-perfused catheters

BACKGROUND

Relaxation of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) is now evaluated calculating 4-second integrated relaxation pressure (4-s IRP) by high resolution manometry (HREPT). Solid-state catheters have been used to define abnormal values. Our aim was to evaluate 4-s IRP in esophageal achalasia using HREPT with perfused catheters.

METHODS

From June 2009 to June 2013, 936 HREPT studies have been performed in our unit. Of these, 194 patients having treated achalasia were excluded. Control group was constituted by 695 patients without achalasia, and 47 patients with untreated achalasia constituted the study group. HREPT was performed with water-perfused catheters. To establish the cut-off value for 4-s IRP that better discriminate patients with achalasia from all other patients, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed.

KEY RESULTS

Twenty three of 47 achalasia patients (49%) showed a 4-s IRP under 15 mmHg; and seven (15%) had a value under modified Chicago criteria. A cut-off value for 4-s IRP of 6.5 mmHg, calculated by ROC analysis, highly discriminates achalasia from the rest of the patients and especially from scleroderma patients (area under the curve: 0.997, 95% CI: 0.995-1.000; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Cut-off values for 4-s IRP defined using HREPT with solid-state catheters are not adequate for diagnosing esophageal achalasia with water-perfused systems. A lower value, i.e., 6.5 mmHg, is suggested for this equipment. The diagnostic criteria of esophageal achalasia should be modified for HREPT performed with water-perfused systems.

Measuring mechanical properties of the esophageal wall using impedance planimetry

The mechanical properties of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) are of major importance for the competence of the EGJ. Although manometry reliably measures sphincter pressure, no information is provided on distensibility, a crucial determinant of flow across the EGJ. Recently, a new technique, impedance planimetry, was introduced allowing accurate measurement of compliance or distensibility. This review discusses the recent advances in this area and highlights the clinical relevance of this new technique evaluating the mechanical properties of the esophageal wall and EGJ.

Clinical applications of gastrointestinal manometry in children

Manometry is a noninvasive diagnostic tool for identifying motility dysfunction of the gastrointestinal tract. Despite the great technical advances in monitoring motility, performance of the study in pediatric patients has several limitations that should be considered during the procedure and interpretation of the test results. This article reviews the clinical applications of conventional esophageal and anorectal manometries in children by describing a technique for performing the test. This review will develop the uniformity required for the methods of performance, the parameters for measurement, and interpretation of test results that could be applied in pediatric clinical practice.

ACG clinical guideline: diagnosis and management of achalasia

Achalasia is a primary motor disorder of the esophagus characterized by insufficient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation and loss of esophageal peristalsis. This results in patients' complaints of dysphagia to solids and liquids, regurgitation, and occasional chest pain with or without weight loss. Endoscopic finding of retained saliva with puckered gastroesophageal junction or barium swallow showing dilated esophagus with birds beaking in a symptomatic patient should prompt appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. In this ACG guideline the authors present an evidence-based approach in patients with achalasia based on a comprehensive review of the pertinent evidence and examination of relevant published data.

Proteomic identification of proteins suggestive of immune-mediated response or neuronal degeneration in serum of achalasia patients

Background/Aims

The primary pathophysiologic abnormality in achalasia is known to be a loss of inhibitory myenteric ganglion cells, which may result from an immune-mediated response or neuronal degeneration. The aim of this study was to identify proteins suggestive of an immune-mediated response or neuronal degeneration in the serum of achalasia patients using a proteomic analysis.

Methods

Blood samples were collected from five symptomatic achalasia patients and five sex- and age-matched healthy controls. Serum proteomic analysis was conducted, and the protein spots were identified using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization/time-of-flight and a proteomics analyzer. The serum level of C3 was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in nine patients with achalasia and 18 sex- and age-matched healthy controls.

Results

Of the 658 matched protein spots, 28 spots were up-regulated over 2-fold in the serum from achalasia patients compared with that from controls. The up-regulated proteins included complement C4B5, complement C3, cyclin-dependent kinase 5, transthyretin, and alpha 2 macroglobulin. The serum levels of C3 in achalasia patients were significantly higher than those of controls.

Conclusions

The serum proteomic analysis of achalasia patients suggests an immune-mediated response or neuronal degeneration. Further validation studies in larger samples and the esophageal tissue of achalasia patients are required.

Efficacy of treatment for patients with achalasia depends on the distensibility of the esophagogastric junction

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Many patients with persistent dysphagia and regurgitation after therapy have low or no lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure. Distensibility of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) largely determines esophageal emptying. We investigated whether assessment of the distensibility of the EGJ is a better and more integrated parameter than LES pressure for determining efficacy of treatment for patients with achalasia.

METHODS

We measured distensibility of the EGJ using an endoscopic functional luminal imaging probe (EndoFLIP) in 15 healthy volunteers (controls; 8 male; age, 40 ± 4.1 years) and 30 patients with achalasia (16 male; age, 51 ± 3.1 years). Patients were also assessed by esophageal manometry and a timed barium esophagogram. Symptom scores were assessed using the Eckardt score, with a score <4 indicating treatment success. The effect of initial and additional treatment on distensibility and symptoms was evaluated in 7 and 5 patients, respectively.

RESULTS

EGJ distensibility was significantly reduced in untreated patients with achalasia compared with controls (0.7 ± 0.9 vs 6.3 ± 0.7 mm(2)/mm Hg; P < .001). In patients with achalasia, EGJ distensibility correlated with esophageal emptying (r = -0.72; P < .01) and symptoms (r = 0.61; P < .01) and was significantly increased with treatment. EGJ distensibility was significantly higher in patients successfully treated (Eckardt score <3) compared with those with an Eckardt score >3 (1.6 ± 0.3 vs 4.4 ± 0.5 mm(2)/mm Hg; P = .001). Even when LES pressure was low, EGJ distensibility could be reduced, which was associated with impaired emptying and recurrent symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

EGJ distensibility is impaired in patients with achalasia and, in contrast to LES pressure, is associated with esophageal emptying and clinical response. Assessment of EGJ distensibility by EndoFLIP is a better parameter than LES pressure for evaluating efficacy of treatment for achalasia.

Clinical and manometric course of nonspecific esophageal motility disorders

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The evolution of nonspecific esophageal motility disorders remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate whether nonspecific esophageal motility disorders progress into specific motility disorders and whether such progression is predictable.

METHODS

Seventy-six symptomatic patients (49 males, 27 females, mean age 57 ± 16 years) with newly diagnosed nonspecific esophageal motility disorders were prospectively registered and followed-up. Follow-up visits, with structured interviews and manometric re-evaluation, were recommended biannually and whenever symptoms exacerbated.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients were followed for up to 4 years, symptoms worsened in 30% of patients, resolved in 26%, improved in 14% and were unchanged in 30%. Twenty-eight patients agreed to undergo manometric re-evaluation. Fifteen (53.6%) of these patients showed a progression to achalasia. The remaining patients continued to display features of nonspecific esophageal motility disorders (32%) or had normal motility (11%). The only significant association could be determined between age and progression to achalasia reaching nearly 100% in patients' ≤46 years of age. In contrast, none of the patients' ≥68 years progressed.

CONCLUSION

More than half of the patients in our cohort with nonspecific esophageal motility disorders showed a transition into achalasia. Neither manometric nor clinical findings predicted the progression of nonspecific esophageal motility disorders. However, young patients were more likely to progress to achalasia.

Heterogeneity of lower esophageal sphincter function in children with achalasia

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Achalasia is a rare esophageal motor disorder in children. The manometric hallmarks are esophageal body aperistalsis, lack of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation, and high LES pressure. However, LES relaxation and function may be heterogeneous, making the diagnosis difficult at times. The aim of the study was to describe LES function in children with achalasia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The present study is a retrospective review of manometric tracings of pediatric patients with achalasia and controls. LES response after each swallow was evaluated. LES parameters were defined as homogeneous (normal or abnormal) if the same response was observed in >75% of swallows. Otherwise, the LES parameters were considered heterogeneous.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients with achalasia and 16 control patients were included. All of the controls had normal LES pressure and relaxation in all of the wet swallows. In the achalasia group, some LES relaxation was present in 74% of swallows and 25% of swallows had normal relaxation. Depending on the parameter, a heterogeneous LES (resting pressure, relaxation, residual pressure, and duration of relaxation) was observed in 27.6% to 34.5% of patients with achalasia versus 0% of the controls (P < 0.001). The rest of the patients with achalasia had homogeneous abnormal responses versus homogeneous normal responses in 100% of control patients (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The LES function in pediatric patients with achalasia is heterogeneous. The classic description of a nonrelaxing high-pressure LES in patients with achalasia is rarely found in children. Partial relaxations are common, and normal relaxations may be present.

High Resolution Manometry Findings in Patients with Esophageal Epiphrenic Diverticula

The pathophysiology of esophageal epiphrenic diverticula is still uncertain even though a concomitant motility disorder is found in the majority of patients in different series. High resolution manometry may allow detection of motor abnormalities in a higher number of patients with esophageal epiphrenic diverticula compared with conventional manometry. This study aims to evaluate the high resolution manometry findings in patients with esophageal epiphrenic diverticula. Nine individuals (mean age 63 ± 10 years, 4 females) with esophageal epiphrenic diverticula underwent high resolution manometry. A single diverticulum was observed in eight patients and multiple diverticula in one. Visual analysis of conventional tracings and color pressure plots for identification of segmental abnormalities was performed by two researchers experienced in high resolution manometry. Upper esophageal sphincter was normal in all patients. Esophageal body was abnormal in eight patients; lower esophageal sphincter was abnormal in seven patients. Named esophageal motility disorders were found in seven patients: achalasia in six, diffuse esophageal spasm in one. In one patient, a segmental hypercontractile zone was noticed with pressure of 196 mm Hg. High resolution manometry demonstrated motor abnormalities in all patients with esophageal epiphrenic diverticula.

High prevalence of heartburn and low acid sensitivity in patients with idiopathic achalasia

BACKGROUND

Heartburn is frequently reported by patients with achalasia before treatment. However, the esophageal sensitivity to acid as a possible mediator of this symptom has not been previously evaluated.

AIM

To evaluate the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms and the esophageal sensitivity to acid perfusion in patients with untreated achalasia.

METHODS

Forty patients with achalasia were prospectively evaluated. Forty-three patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease comprised the control group (ten of them with Barrett's esophagus). Symptoms were evaluated by a structured clinical questionnaire. Objective assessment was performed by ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring and endoscopy. Esophageal sensitivity to acid was evaluated by esophageal perfusion of ClH 0.1 N.

RESULTS

Fifteen (37%) of the 40 patients with achalasia presented heartburn, but only four of them had esophagitis and/or abnormal esophageal pH recording. Eight patients had abnormal pH recording. Three patients had esophagitis. The esophagus was sensitive to acid in seven (17%) patients with achalasia, three of them with heartburn and one with abnormal pH recording. In the control group, 40 of 43 (93%) presented heartburn. Acid perfusion was positive in 32 (74%). Sensitivity to acid was lower in patients with achalasia than in those with gastroesophageal reflux disease with or without Barrett's esophagus.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of heartburn in patients with achalasia is high, although its association with objective indicators of gastroesophageal reflux disease is weak. Patients with achalasia have lower esophageal sensitivity to acid than patients with GERD, suggesting that heartburn is does not arise from this condition.

A high-resolution view of achalasia

BACKGROUND

High-resolution manometry (HRM) makes it possible to better evaluate spatial and temporal characteristics of esophageal motor function. This technology is revealing new observations regarding disordered motor function in esophageal diseases.

GOAL

The aim of this study was to define the essential features of achalasia using HRM.

STUDY

We performed HRM on 27 patients with achalasia, 10 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, and 10 controls. Ten 5 mL water swallows were recorded with a solid-state manometric assembly incorporating 36 circumferential sensors spaced at 1-cm intervals.

RESULTS

The resting lower esophageal sphincter pressure was greater in achalasia than in controls or gastroesophageal reflux disease. There was an absence of peristalsis in the smooth muscle esophagus and failure of lower esophageal sphincter relaxation. The resting upper esophageal sphincter pressure was not different among the 3 groups. In addition to the typical manometric findings of achalasia, new observations are included. Esophageal shortening, pressurization of the esophagus, and rhythmic contractions of the upper esophageal sphincter and striated muscle esophagus were frequently observed.

CONCLUSIONS

HRM demonstrates alterations of esophageal motor function in achalasia that are not easily observed with other manometric techniques.

Clinical, radiological, and manometric profile in 145 patients with untreated achalasia

BACKGROUND

Esophageal achalasia is characterized by the absence of esophageal peristalsis and by a dysfunctional lower esophageal sphincter (LES). Descriptions of clinical, radiological, and manometric findings in patients with achalasia usually have been based on small numbers of patients. This study was designed to determine in patients with untreated achalasia: (1) clinical presentation; (2) how often a diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was erroneously made based on the presence of heartburn; (3) manometric profile; (4) relationship between chest pain and the manometric finding of vigorous achalasia.

METHODS

Between 1990 and 2004, a diagnosis of esophageal achalasia was established in 145 patients. None of them had been previously treated (no previous endoscopic or surgical treatment). We evaluated the demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as the results of the endoscopy, barium swallow, esophageal manometry, and ambulatory pH monitoring. We also compared the clinical and the manometric profile of patients with classic and patients with vigorous achalasia.

RESULTS

Most patients with untreated achalasia had dysphagia (94%). Regurgitation was present in 76% and heartburn in 52%. Chest pain (41%) and weight loss (35%) were less common. Acid-suppressing medications had been prescribed to 65 patients (45%) who complained of heartburn on the assumption that GERD was present. The LES was hypertensive in 43% of patients only. There was no significant difference in the prevalence, severity, and duration of chest pain in patients with classic and with vigorous achalasia.

CONCLUSIONS

These results show that in patients with untreated achalasia: (1) dysphagia was the most frequent complaint, but regurgitation and heartburn were frequently present; (2) a diagnosis of GERD based on the presence of heartburn was highly unreliable; (3) the LES was hypertensive in less than half of patients; and (4) the prevalence, severity, and duration of chest pain did not correlate with the manometric finding of vigorous achalasia.

Update on the management of achalasia: balloons, surgery and drugs

Achalasia cannot be cured. Instead, our goal is to relieve symptoms of dysphagia and regurgitation, improve esophageal emptying and prevent the development of megaesophagus. The most definitive therapies are pneumatic dilation and surgical myotomy. The overall success of grade pneumatic dilation is 78%, with women and older patients performing best. Laparoscopic myotomy has an overall success rate of 85%, but can be complicated by the sequelae of severe acid reflux disease. Young patients, especially men, are the best candidates for surgical myotomy. There are no prospective, randomized studies comparing these two procedures. Botulinum toxin injections into the esophagus and smooth muscle relaxants are reserved for older patients or those with major comorbid illnesses. Some patients with end-stage achalasia will require esophagectomy.

Utility and standards in esophageal manometry

Esophageal manometry is a specialized procedure used to evaluate lower and upper esophageal sphincter pressure, esophageal body contraction amplitude, and peristaltic sequence. The procedure is clinically useful in evaluation of a patient with nonstructural dysphagia, unexplained or noncardiac chest pain, a compendium of symptoms suggested because of gastroesophageal reflux disease, and in the preoperative evaluation for antireflux surgery. Manometric findings in 95 normal subjects evenly distributed across age groups were reported in 1987, and are the values still used in our and most laboratories today. The subsequent review will offer our "view" on the clinical utility of esophageal manometry, on the basis of years of experience and performance techniques that have remained constant over decades.

Barium esophagography: a study for all seasons

Although a variety of diagnostic procedures are often performed on patients with pharyngeal or esophageal symptoms, barium esophagography is a noninvasive, inexpensive, and readily available test that can simultaneously evaluate swallowing function, esophageal motility, gastroesophageal reflux, and a host of structural abnormalities in the pharynx and esophagus. This article reviews the role of barium esophagography for assessing swallowing function, morphologic abnormalities of the pharynx (diverticula, webs, and carcinoma), esophageal motility disorders (achalasia and diffuse esophageal spasm), and morphologic abnormalities of the esophagus (reflux esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus, infectious esophagitis, drug-induced esophagitis, eosinophilic esophagitis, Schatzki's ring, and esophageal carcinoma).

Impaired deglutitive EGJ relaxation in clinical esophageal manometry: a quantitative analysis of 400 patients and 75 controls

Assessing deglutitive esophagogastric junction (EGJ) relaxation is an essential focus of clinical manometry. Our aim was to apply automated algorithmic analyses to high-resolution manometry (HRM) studies to ascertain the optimal method for discriminating normal from abnormal deglutitive EGJ relaxation. All 473 subjects (73 controls) were studied with a 36-channel solid-state HRM assembly during water swallows. Patients were classified as: 1) achalasia, 2) postfundoplication, 3) nonachalasia with normal deglutitive EGJ relaxation, or 4) functional obstruction (preserved peristalsis with incomplete EGJ relaxation). Automated computer programs assessed the adequacy of EGJ relaxation by using progressively complex analysis routines to compensate for esophageal shortening, crural diaphragm contraction, and catheter movement, all potential confounders. The single-sensor method of assessing EGJ relaxation had a sensitivity of only 52% for detecting achalasia. Of the automated HRM analysis paradigms tested, the 4-s integrated relaxation pressure using a cutoff of 15 mmHg performed optimally with 98% sensitivity and 96% specificity in the detection of achalasia. We also identified a heterogeneous group of 26 patients with functional EGJ obstruction attributed to variant achalasia and other diverse pathology. Although further clinical experience will ultimately judge, it is our expectation that applying rigorous methodology such as described herein to the analysis of HRM studies will improve the consistency in the interpretation of clinical manometry and prove useful in guiding clinical management.

Pneumatic dilatation or laparoscopic cardiomyotomy in the management of newly diagnosed idiopathic achalasia. Results of a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The most effective therapeutic strategy in newly diagnosed achalasia is yet to be established. Therefore we designed a study in which pneumatic dilatation was compared to laparoscopic cardiomyotomy to which was added a partial posterior fundoplication.

PATIENTS AND RESULTS

A series of 51 patients (24 males, mean age 44 years) were randomly allocated to the therapeutic modalities (dilatation = 26, surgery = 25). All patients were followed for at least 12 months, and during that period the pneumatic dilatations strategy had significantly more treatment failures (P = 0.04). Only minor differences emerged between the study groups when symptoms, dysphagia scorings, and quality-of-life assessments were evaluated 12 months after initiation of therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic myotomy was found to be superior to an endoscopic balloon dilatation strategy in the treatment of achalasia when studied during the first 12 months after treatment.

Is aperistalsis with complete lower esophageal sphincter relaxation an early stage of classic achalasia?

BACKGROUND

Aperistalsis with complete lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation, characterized by the complete relaxation of the LES and aperistalsis of the esophageal body on manometry, has been considered by some authors to be an early manifestation of classic achalasia, which is defined as incomplete relaxation of the LES and aperistalsis of the esophageal body. The aim of the present study was to compare the clinical features of patients with aperistalsis with complete LES relaxation, with those of patients with classic achalasia.

METHODS

Eighteen patients with aperistalsis with complete LES relaxation and 53 patients with classic achalasia were analyzed with regard to clinical history, the maximal diameter of the esophageal body on barium esophagogram, LES resting pressure and the duration of LES relaxation on manometric recordings, and the selected treatment and its efficacy.

RESULTS

The aperistalsis with complete LES relaxation group had distinctly different features compared to those of the classic achalasia group including older age, more frequent association with non-cardiac chest pain, less frequent association with dysphagia and weight loss, lower LES resting pressures, and longer duration of LES relaxation. However, the two groups were similar in terms of maximal diameter of the esophageal body, and efficacy associated with pneumatic dilation.

CONCLUSIONS

Aperistalsis with complete LES relaxation on manometry is not necessarily an early manifestation of classic achalasia. However, this condition does not preclude a diagnosis of achalasia or a good response to achalasia therapy.

Multiple rapid swallowing in idiopathic achalasia: evidence for patients' heterogeneity

In order to evaluate the function of inhibitory neural pathways in achalasia, we compared the response of the oesophageal body and lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) to single swallows (SS) and multiple rapid swallowing (MRS) in 20 consecutive patients with untreated idiopathic achalasia (10 men, aged 23-81 years) and in 20 control patients without dysphagia (nine men, aged 31-73 years), using sleeve manometry; 277 SS and 85 MRS were analysed. In the control group, MRS inhibited motor activity in the oesophageal body and induced a slightly lower (P < 0.05) nadir LOS pressure compared with SS. In the achalasia patients, MRS induced a variable response: eight patients had simultaneous motor activity during all MRS although onset was delayed compared with SS [median (interquartile range), 3.5 s (1.7-6.1) vs 1.4 s (0.8-3.9); P < 0.05], whereas eight patients showed motor inhibition which occurred during all MRS in four of them, and the remaining four had no motor activity both after SS and during MRS. Overall MRS did not decrease nadir LOS pressure compared with SS [12 mmHg (5-20) vs 16 mmHg (7-22); P > 0.1]; however, it induced complete LOS relaxation in three of the patients. MRS gives further evidence of functional heterogeneity among achalasia patients.

Prevalence of increased esophageal muscle thickness in patients with esophageal symptoms

BACKGROUND

Patients with achalasia, diffuse esophageal spasm (DES), and nutcracker esophagus have a thicker muscularis propria than normal subjects. The goal of our study was to determine the prevalence of increased muscle thickness in a group of unselected patients referred to the esophageal function laboratory for evaluation of the symptoms.

METHODS

We studied 40 normal subjects and 94 consecutive patients. Manometry and ultrasound images were recorded concurrently, using a special custom-built catheter. Esophageal muscle thickness and muscle cross-sectional area were measured at 2 and 10 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). Patients were assigned manometric diagnosis and determination was made if they had increased muscle thickness and muscle cross-sectional area.

RESULTS

Nearly all patients with well-defined spastic motor disorders, i.e., achalasia, DES, and nutcracker esophagus, revealed (a) an increase in the muscle thickness/cross-sectional area, (b) increase in esophageal muscle thickness/cross-sectional area was also seen, albeit at a lower prevalence rate, in patients with less well-characterized manometric abnormalities, i.e., hypertensive LES, impaired LES relaxation, and ineffective esophageal motility, and (c) 24% of patients with esophageal symptoms but normal manometry were also found to have an increase in muscle thickness/cross-sectional area. Dysphagia was more likely, and heartburn less likely in patients with increased muscle thickness, but there were no differences in chest pain and regurgitation symptoms between the groups.

CONCLUSION

We describe, for the first time, increased muscle thickness in patients with esophageal symptoms and normal manometry. We suggest that increased esophageal muscle thickness is likely to be an important marker of esophageal motor dysfunction.

Achalasia: physiology and etiopathogenesis

Achalasia is a disorder of esophageal motility that has been well documented for over 300 years. Despite this, the initiating factor or factors and the underlying mechanisms leading to the characteristic features of achalasia, the absence of distal esophageal peristalsis and abnormal lower esophageal sphincter relaxation, are still not well understood. Recent work has shed light on changes in neurotransmission and cell signaling in the lower esophagus and lower esophageal sphincter that lead to achalasia. A number of recent reviews have thoroughly discussed diagnostic and therapeutic modalities and the reader is referred to these for in-depth review of these topics. The focus of this review will be on our current understanding of the physiology of esophageal peristalsis and lower esophageal sphincter function as it relates to achalasia and on available evidence for etiology and proposed pathophysiologic mechanisms.

Modern management of achalasia

The goals in the treatment of achalasia are threefold: 1) relieving the symptoms, particularly dysphagia and bland regurgitation; 2) improving esophageal emptying by disrupting the poorly relaxing lower esophageal sphincter (LES); and 3) preventing the development of megaesophagus. Although achalasia cannot be permanently cured, excellent palliation is available in over 90% of patients, especially those with pneumatic dilation and laparoscopic Heller myotomy. The efficacy for short- and long-term therapy seems to be similar when performed by experts. Pneumatic dilation done as an outpatient surgery disrupts the LES muscle from within by using balloons of progressively larger diameter (3.0, 3.5, and 4.0 cm). Repeat dilations may be required; secondary severe gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is rare, but approximately 2% of patients will have an esophageal perforation. A surgical Heller myotomy is now being done laparoscopically through the abdomen that cuts the LES and extends the myotomy 2 to 3 cm onto the stomach. Usually 2 days of hospitalization is required, and patients can normally return to work in 1 to 2 weeks. Severe GERD with esophagitis and peptic stricture is a common complication; therefore, most surgeons combine the myotomy with an incomplete fundoplication. Medical therapy is much less effective than these invasive procedures. Smooth muscle relaxants (nitrates and calcium channel blockers) taken immediately before meals improve dysphagia, but side effects and drug tolerance are common. The injection of botulinum toxin (100 to 200 units) endoscopically into the LES gives short-term relief of symptoms and improves esophageal emptying. This treatment is most effective in the elderly, as symptom relief can last up to 1 to 2 years with a single injection. Several studies suggest the most cost-effective management of achalasia is initial treatment with pneumatic dilation.

Achalasia with Complete Relaxation of Lower Esophageal Sphincter: Radiographic-Manometric Correlation

PURPOSE

To evaluate retrospectively the presence of complete relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) at manometry in patients with achalasia depicted on barium esophagograms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The institutional review board approved this retrospective study and did not require informed consent. A search of radiology and manometry records identified 21 patients (12 men, nine women; mean age, 52.4 years) with achalasia depicted on barium esophagograms who had undergone manometric examinations and met the inclusion criteria. Radiologic reports and images were reviewed for presence or absence of primary peristalsis, impaired LES opening, esophageal dilatation, delayed emptying of barium, and nonperistaltic contractions. Manometry reports were reviewed for presence or absence of peristalsis or simultaneous esophageal contractions. Resting and residual LES pressures were recorded to determine whether LES relaxation was complete or incomplete. Medical records were reviewed to determine clinical presentation and follow-up (treatment and patient course), and radiographic files were reviewed to determine radiographic findings at follow-up examinations. Clinical characteristics (eg, age, dysphagia, and weight loss) were correlated with LES relaxation at manometry. Data were analyzed statistically with Fisher exact and Wilcoxon rank sum testing.

RESULTS

All 21 patients with radiographic findings of achalasia had aperistalsis at manometry. Fourteen patients (67%) had incomplete LES relaxation at manometry during swallowing, and seven (33%) had complete LES relaxation. There were no significant differences between patients with complete LES relaxation and those with incomplete LES relaxation in mean age (P = .59), duration of dysphagia (P = .18), or weight loss (P > .99). Clinical follow-up findings were available for six patients with complete LES relaxation at manometry and 10 with incomplete relaxation. Symptoms resolved after treatment in all six patients with complete LES relaxation. Six (60%) of 10 patients with incomplete LES relaxation had resolution of symptoms after treatment, and four (40%) had substantial improvement.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that in patients with typical radiographic findings of achalasia, the barium study can be used to guide treatment without a need for manometry. If radiographic findings are equivocal, however, manometry may be required for a more certain diagnosis.

Transient failure of opening of the lower oesophageal sphincter on upright oesophagrams: radiographic and clinical findings

The purpose of our study was to determine the frequency, radiographic features, and clinical importance of transient failure of opening of the lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) on upright double-contrast views of the oesophagus. A computerized search of radiology records identified 16 patients who had transient failure of opening of the LOS on upright views from biphasic oesophagrams or upper gastrointestinal tract examinations using high-density barium but normal opening of the LOS on prone views using low-density barium. The radiographic findings were reviewed and correlated with the clinical and manometric findings. In all cases, barium studies revealed tapered, beaklike narrowing of the distal oesophagus on upright double-contrast views, with a normal-appearing distal oesophagus, normal opening of the LOS, and intact peristalsis on prone single-contrast views. Only seven patients (44%) had dysphagia. Five of these patients had clinical follow-up, and the dysphagia improved or resolved without specific treatment for LOS dysfunction in four. The remaining patient had persistent dysphagia, but this individual had polymyositis as the likely cause for his dysphagia. Manometry revealed incomplete relaxation of the LOS in two patients and normal relaxation in one. Our experience suggests that failure of opening of the LOS may be observed as a transient finding of little clinical importance on upright double-contrast views of the oesophagus using high-density barium, with normal opening of the LOS on prone single-contrast views using low-density barium. It is important to be aware of this finding, so that it is not mistaken for achalasia or other abnormalities of the distal oesophagus.

Manometry: technical issues

Manometry involves many technical issues, and a complete understanding of all aspects of the esophageal testing process is required to study the human esophagus in a way that yields accurate, technically sound qualitative and quantitative studies that include the measure of esophageal length and positional plotting of transducers within the esophagus. Topics discussed are catheter measurement and memory; checking the system; performing manometry; patient history; intubation technique; marking, mapping, and measuring the esophagus, and analysis of results.

Relationship Between Diffuse Esophageal Spasm and Lower Esophageal Sphincter Dysfunction on Barium Studies and Manometry in 14 Patients

OBJECTIVE

We sought to reassess the function and clinical characteristics of the lower esophageal sphincter in a series of patients with radiographically defined diffuse esophageal spasm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In reviewing records in the radiology database at our hospital, we identified 14 patients with diffuse esophageal spasm confirmed on barium studies who also underwent esophageal manometry. The radiographic findings were reviewed and correlated with the manometric findings. Medical records were also reviewed to determine the clinical presentation, treatment, and patient course.

RESULTS

All 14 patients were symptomatic, presenting with dysphagia, chest pain, or both. All the barium studies revealed intermittently absent or weakened peristalsis, with nonperistaltic contractions that were moderate in six patients (43%) and marked in eight patients (57%) (contractions nearly obliterating the lumen in six and completely obliterating the lumen in two). Nine patients (64%) had impaired opening of the lower esophageal sphincter, manifested by beaklike narrowing of the distal esophagus, and five (36%) had normal opening of the lower esophageal sphincter. Manometry revealed abnormal peristalsis in all 14 patients, with repetitive simultaneous contractions in eight (57%) and lower esophageal sphincter dysfunction in 12 (86%). All eight patients with lower esophageal sphincter dysfunction or incomplete relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter on barium studies or manometry who were treated with the Clostridium botulinum toxin or endoscopic balloon dilatation had a positive response.

CONCLUSION

Our preliminary data show that diffuse esophageal spasm is characterized on barium studies by frequent lower esophageal sphincter dysfunction rather than a classic corkscrew appearance. Barium and manometric studies may have complementary roles in the evaluation of patients with diffuse esophageal spasm.

Impedance characteristics of esophageal motor function in achalasia

Detailed data on patterns of esophageal bolus transport in patients with achalasia are still lacking. To study these we applied the novel technique of multichannel intraluminal impedance measurements. Ten patients with achalasia were studied using a 16 channel system. Liquid and semisolid boluses of 10 mL were applied with the patients in a supine position. Patterns of bolus transport were determined and analyzed as compared to results obtained from 20 healthy subjects. The healthy subjects featured a unique typical primary peristalsis pattern independent of bolus viscosity. In contrast, achalasia patients demonstrated different impedance characteristics, including: (i) significantly lower baseline esophageal impedance during the resting state as compared with healthy volunteers (999 omega +/- 108 versus 2749 omega +/- 113); (ii) failed bolus transport through the esophagus in all cases; (iii) impedance evidence of luminal content regurgitation in 35% of the swallows (iv) impedance evidence of pathological air movement within the proximal esophagus during deglutition in 38% of the swallows, so called air trapping. Thus, impedance characteristics of achalasia have been defined and can be attributed to known symptoms of achalasia. They can be used as basic findings for further classification of pathological bolus transports in other esophageal motility disorders.

Development of achalasia secondary to laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication

Dysphagia after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) is commonly attributed to edema and/or improperly constructed wraps, and in some instances the cause can be difficult to identify. We report, for the first time, the development of secondary achalasia after LNF as a cause of late-onset postoperative dysphagia. A total of 250 consecutive patients undergoing LNF were analyzed for the development of postoperative dysphagia at a university hospital. Patients were considered to have secondary achalasia if they met the following four criteria: (1) preoperative manometry demonstrating normal peristalsis and normal lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation; (2) lack of esophageal peristalsis on postoperative manometry or fluoroscopy with or without incomplete LES relaxation; (3) no mucosal lesions seen on endoscopy; and (4) dysphagia refractory to dilatation. The following three groups of patients were identified: patients who developed secondary achalasia (group A, n = 7); patients with persistent dysphagia requiring and responding to postoperative dilatation (group B, n = 12 patients); and patients whose postoperative recovery was not complicated by dysphagia (group C, n = 231). The groups were comparable in terms of all preoperative variables except for age. Patients in group A were older than those in group B (57 years [range 27 to 66 years] vs. 36.5 years [range 27 to 63 years], P = 0.028) but were not significantly older than patients in group C (45 years [range 20 to 84 years], P = 0.42). The onset of severe dysphagia was later in group A than in group B (135 days [range 15 to 300 days] vs. 20 days [range 9 to 70 days], P = 0.002). The median weight loss in group A was also significantly greater than in Group B (15 pounds [range 11 to 44 pounds] vs. 4 pounds [range 0 to 15 pounds], P = 0.0007). Two patients in group A who underwent reoperation failed to improve. Botulinum toxin injections were tried in two patients and Heller myotomy in one with good results. Nine patients in group B improved promptly after one dilatation, and three improved after two dilatations. Secondary achalasia should be considered as one of the causes of persistent dysphagia after an apparently successful antireflux operation. Secondary achalasia tends to occur in older patients and is characterized by a delayed onset of symptoms. Imaging studies are a reliable means of excluding mechanical obstruction as a cause of secondary achalasia, and a negative result should raise the suspicion of secondary achalasia. Esophageal motility studies are necessary to confirm the diagnosis. Failure to consider the diagnosis of secondary achalasia can lead to multiple fruitless attempts at dilatation or even inappropriate reoperations.