Treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis with low-dose weekly methotrexate

Update on Emerging Treatment Options for Primary Biliary Cholangitis

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a rare autoimmune cholestatic liver disease that may progress to fibrosis or cirrhosis. Treatment options are currently limited. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) remains first-line therapy and has been proven to normalize serum biochemistries, halt histologic disease progression, and lead to patient survival comparable to the general population. Obeticholic acid (OCA) was recently approved as adjunct therapy in PBC patients with inadequate response or intolerance to UDCA. However, OCA has been associated with worsening pruritus in clinical studies which may limit its use in this patient population. Several studies are currently underway to address the lack of treatment options for PBC. Of these, fibrates, which have been used in Japan for over a decade, have produced promising results. Furthermore, as currently approved therapies for PBC do not address the potentially debilitating clinical symptoms of PBC such as pruritus and fatigue, supplemental therapy is often required for symptom control.

Evaluation of the United Kingdom-primary biliary cholangitis and global primary biliary cholangitis group prognostic models for primary biliary cholangitis patients treated with ursodeoxycholic acid in the U.S. population

Background and Aim

The United Kingdom‐primary biliary cholangitis (UK‐PBC) and global primary biliary cholangitis group (GLOBE) prognostic models have been recently developed to predict long‐term outcomes in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). However, these predictive scores have not yet been well evaluated in the U.S. population.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed newly diagnosed PBC patients at the Cleveland Clinic between November 1998 and February 2017. Adverse events were defined as liver transplantation, liver‐related mortality, and all‐cause mortality. Transplant‐free survival (TFS) was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Predictive performances of all prognostic models were evaluated using the C‐statistic.

Results

We identified 352 patients who used ursodeoxycholic acid therapy. Of them, 311 (88.4%) only had PBC, while 41 (11.6%) were diagnosed with PBC‐autoimmune hepatitis overlap. A total of 22 (6%), 47 (13%), and 55 (16%) patients had adverse events within 5, 10, and 15 years after diagnosis, respectively. In patients with PBC only, the C‐statistic in predicting 15‐year adverse events was 0.75 per GLOBE compared to 0.74 per UK‐PBC (P = 0.94), 0.73 per Rotterdam (P = 0.44), 0.66 per Barcelona (P = 0.004), 0.65 per Paris 1 (P = 0.005), 0.62 per Paris 2 (P < 0.0001), 0.60 per Toronto (P < 0.0001), and 0.60 per Mayo (P < 0.0001) scores. Median follow‐up was 9.2 years. Ten‐year TFS for patients who had optimal versus suboptimal treatment response was 92 versus 74% per Paris 1 (P < 0.0001), 95 versus 79% per Paris 2 (P = 0.0002), 93 versus 65% per Barcelona (P < 0.0001), and 96 versus 68% per Rotterdam (P < 0.0001) risk scores, respectively.

Conclusion

In our cohort of PBC patients, the UK‐PBC and GLOBE scores were both accurate and reasonably valid prognostic models in the U.S. population.

Natural history and management of primary biliary cirrhosis

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune disease that mainly targets the cholangiocytes of the interlobular bile ducts in the liver. It is a rare disease with prevalence of less than one in 2000. Its prevalence in developing countries is increasing presumably because of growth in recognition and knowledge of the disease. PBC is thought to result from a combination of multiple genetic factors and superimposed environmental triggers. The contribution of the genetic predisposition is evidenced by familial clustering. Several risk factors, including exposure to infectious agents and chemical xenobiotics, have been suggested. Common symptoms of the disease are fatigue and pruritus, but most patients are asymptomatic at first presentation. The prognosis of PBC has improved because of early diagnosis and use of ursodeoxycholic acid, the only established medical treatment for this disorder. When administered at adequate doses of 13–15 mg/kg/day, up to two out of three patients with PBC may have a normal life expectancy without additional therapeutic measures. However, some patients do not respond adequately to ursodeoxycholic acid and might need alternative therapeutic approaches.

Analysis of the clinical relevance of antimitochondrial antibodies to the β- and γ-subunits of the F1F0-ATPase in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis

Background

In a recent study we showed that in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) being positive or negative for anti-M2 antibodies reacting with the 2-oxoacid-dehydrogenase complex (ODC) also antibodies to the beta- and gamma-subunits of F₁F₀-ATPase (anti-β, anti-γ) occur. This is a mitochondrial enzyme but parts are also expressed on plasma membranes of endothelial cells. Here we wanted to analyse in more detail their clinical relevance.

Methods

Fifty-nine untreated and histologically defined PBC patients who had been followed for at least five years were included into the study (51 anti-M2 positive, 8 anti-M2 negative). Twenty-three of them were treated in the follow up with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), eight received during a trial methotrexate (MTX). In 13 patients orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) had to be performed. Serum samples before and during therapy were available. Patients were analysed with respect to laboratory parameters, disease activity and histological stages.

Patients’ sera were tested by ELISA for IgG- and IgM-antibodies against the beta- and gamma-subunits which had been recombinant expressed in E.coli and highly purified by electro-elution from SDS-gels after electrophoresis.

Results

Fifty-nine percent of the anti-M2 positive and 50% of the anti-M2 negative PBC patients had anti-β- and/or anti-γ-antibodies. There were no differences between anti-β- and/or anti-γ-antibody positive or negative patients with respect to biochemical parameters, immunoglobulins, histological stages or disease activity. Antibody reactivity significantly decreased during UDCA and MTX-treatment and also after OLT.

Conclusions

Antibodies to the β- and γ-subunits of F₁F₀-ATPase occur in anti-M2 positive and –negative PBC but do not have any relevance with respect to clinical activity or prognosis. However, in contrast to the anti-M2 antibodies they decrease during UDCA and immunosuppressive therapy.

Chlorambucil for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Chlorambucil has been used for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis as it possesses immunosuppressive properties. But it is unknown whether it benefits or harms these patients.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the beneficial and any harmful effects of chlorambucil for primary biliary cirrhosis patients.

SEARCH METHODS

Eligible trials were identified by searching the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register (March 2012), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library (2012, Issue 2), MEDLINE (1946 to March 2012), EMBASE (1974 to March 2012), Science Citation Index EXPANDED (1900 to March 2012), The Chinese Biomedical Database (1976 to March 2012), The Chinese Medical Current Contents (1994 to March 2012), The China Hospital Knowledge Database (1994 to March 2012), and a database of ongoing trials (http://www.controlled-trials.com/mrct/) (accessed 6 March 2012). The reference lists of the retrieved publications and review articles were also read through, and pharmaceutical companies known to produce chlorambucil were contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials, irrespective of language, year of publication, and publication status, comparing chlorambucil at any dose versus placebo, no intervention, another active drug, or one dose of chlorambucil with another dose.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We planned to assess continuous data with mean differences (MD), and dichotomous outcomes with relative risk (RR), both with 95% confidence intervals (CI). As we only identified one trial, Fisher's exact tests were employed.

MAIN RESULTS

Only one randomised trial was identified and included in the review. The bias risk in the trial was high. The trial compared chlorambucil versus no intervention in 24 patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. Fisher's exact test did not show a significant reduction of mortality when comparing chlorambucil with no treatment (0/13 (0%) versus (2/11 (18.2%); P = 0.20). There was no significant difference regarding adverse events for chlorambucil compared with no treatment, but all patients receiving chlorambucil experienced adverse events (13/13 (100%) versus (3/11 (27%); P = 0.1). According to the authors of the trial, chlorambucil led to a significant improvement in mean serum levels of bilirubin (P < 0.05), albumin (P < 0.05), immunoglobulin M (P < 0.01), serum aspartate aminotransferase activity (P < 0.01), and hepatic inflammatory infiltrates (P < 0.01).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is not sufficient evidence to support or reject the use of chlorambucil for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. Chlorambucil may show benefit in some unvalidated surrogate outcome measures (for example, serum bilirubin and immunoglobulin M levels). Chlorambucil is, however, connected with a number of adverse events. Bone marrow suppression should be noted in particular. Further randomised clinical trials are necessary to assess the benefits and harms of chlorambucil in this indication.

Methotrexate for primary biliary cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Methotrexate has been used to treat patients with primary biliary cirrhosis as it possesses immunosuppressive properties. The previously prepared version of this review from 2005 showed that methotrexate seemed to significantly increase mortality in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. Since that last review version, follow-up data of the included trials have been published.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of methotrexate for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Randomised clinical trials were identified by searching The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and EMBASE (from their inception until September 2009). Reference lists were also read through. Authors of trials were contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We searched to include randomised clinical trials comparing methotrexate with placebo, no intervention, or another drug irrespective of blinding, language, year of publication, or publication status.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Our primary outcomes were mortality, and mortality or liver transplantation combined. Dichotomous outcomes were reported as relative risks (RR) and hazard ratios (HR) if applicable. Continuous outcomes were reported as mean differences (MD).

MAIN RESULTS

Five trials were included. Four trials with 370 patients compared methotrexate with placebo or no intervention (three trials added an equal dose of ursodeoxycholic acid to the intervention groups). The bias risk of these trials was high. We did not find statistically significant effects of methotrexate on mortality (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.66 to 2.64), mortality or liver transplantation combined, pruritus, fatigue, liver complications, liver biochemistry, liver histology, or adverse events. The pruritus score (MD - 0.17, 95% CI - 0.25 to - 0.09) was significantly lower in patients receiving methotrexate. The prothrombin time was significantly worsened in patients receiving methotrexate (MD 1.60 s, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.02). One trial with 85 patients compared methotrexate with colchicine. The trial had low risk of bias. Methotrexate, when compared to colchicine, did not significantly effect mortality, fatigue, liver biopsy, or adverse events. Methotrexate significantly benefited pruritus score (MD - 0.68, 95% CI - 1.11 to - 0.25), serum alkaline phosphatases (MD - 0.41 U/l, 95% CI - 0.70 to - 0.12), and plasma immunoglobulin M (MD - 0.47 mg/dl, 95% CI - 0.74 to - 0.20) compared with colchicine. Other outcomes showed no statistical difference.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Methotrexate had no statistically significant effect on mortality in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis nor the need for liver transplantation. Although methotrexate may benefit other outcomes (pruritus score, serum alkaline phosphatase, immunoglobulin M levels), there is no sufficient evidence to support methotrexate for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.

Management of autoimmune and cholestatic liver disorders

The management of autoimmune and cholestatic liver disorders is a challenging area of hepatology. Autoimmune and cholestatic liver diseases represent a comparatively small proportion of hepatobiliary disorders, yet their appropriate management is of critical importance for patient survival. In this article, management strategies are discussed, including the indications and expectations of pharmacologic therapy, endoscopic approaches, and the role of liver transplantation.

Clinical features and management of primary biliary cirrhosis

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), which is characterized by progressive destruction of intrahepatic bile ducts, is not a rare disease since both prevalence and incidence are increasing during the last years mainly due to the improvement of case finding strategies. The prognosis of the disease has improved due to both the recognition of earlier and indolent cases, and to the wide use of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). New indicators of prognosis are available that will be useful especially for the growing number of patients with less severe disease. Most patients are asymptomatic at presentation. Pruritus may represent the most distressing symptom and, when UDCA is ineffective, cholestyramine represents the mainstay of treatment. Complications of long-standing cholestasis may be clinically relevant only in very advanced stages. Available data on the effects of UDCA on clinically relevant end points clearly indicate that the drug is able to slow but not to halt the progression of the disease while, in advanced stages, the only therapeutic option remains liver transplantation.

Role of methotrexate in the treatment of chronic cholestatic disorders

This article examines the therapeutic potential of methotrexate (MTX) in the treatment of cholestatic liver disease, with specific reference to its use in primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). In PBC patients, evidence suggests that a particular subset of patients may benefit, either biochemically or symptomatically, from the addition of MTX to their therapeutic regimen. How best to define these potential MTX responders remains unclear, but may warrant a "therapeutic trial" in some patients with more aggressive disease or in patients with refractory and disabling PBC-related symptoms. In contrast, PSC continues to be an immensely challenging disease to effectively treat, and the role of MTX for treating PSC patients remains dubious.

Protective effect of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid on primary culture of rat hepatocytes

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Recently, we reported on the beneficial clinical effects of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) who were unresponsive to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). In this study we examined the effect of EPA on rat hepatocytes in primary culture.

METHODS

Hepatocytes were isolated from rat liver by perfusion of collagenase and cultured with or without EPA. Cell damage induced by chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) was assessed by WST-8 assay and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release. PGE(2) and LTB(4) concentrations in the culture medium were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). cDNA was made from total RNA that was extracted from hepatocytes, and TaqMan polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed to assess the expression of CuZn and Mn superoxide dismutase (SOD) mRNA.

RESULTS

When rat hepatocytes were cultured in the presence of EPA, the damage caused by CDCA was significantly decreased compared with cells cultured without EPA. Cytotoxicity significantly decreased in the presence of EPA. Furthermore, SOD mRNA expression was increased by adding EPA. These findings indicated that EPA protects cells by scavenging superoxide radicals ((*)O(2-)) mediated by SOD production.

CONCLUSION

EPA has a direct protective effect on rat hepatocytes, which is in agreement with the clinical efficacy of EPA in PBC patients.

Cyclosporin A for primary biliary cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Cyclosporin A has been used for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis, but the therapeutic responses in randomised clinical trials have been heterogeneous.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of cyclosporin A for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Relevant randomised clinical trials were identified by searching The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, The Chinese Biomedical Database, and LILACS, and manual searches of bibliographies to June 2006. We contacted authors of trials and the company producing cyclosporin A.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials comparing cyclosporin A with placebo, no intervention, or another drug were included irrespective of blinding, language, year of publication, and publication status.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Our primary outcomes were mortality, and mortality or liver transplantation. Dichotomous outcomes were reported as relative risk (RR) and if appropriate, Peto odds ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI). Continuous outcomes were reported as weighted mean difference (WMD) or standardised mean difference (SMD). We examined intervention effects by random-effects and fixed-effect models.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified three trials with 390 patients that compared cyclosporin A versus placebo. Two of them were assessed methodologically adequate with low-bias risk. Cyclosporin A did not significantly reduce mortality risk (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.45), and mortality or liver transplantation (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.20). Cyclosporin A significantly improved pruritus (SMD -0.38, 95% CI -0.63 to -0.14), but not fatigue. Cyclosporin A significantly reduced alanine aminotransferase (WMD -41 U/L, 95% CI -63 to -18) and increased serum albumin level (WMD 1.66 g/L, 95% CI 0.26 to 3.05). Significantly more patients experienced adverse events in the cyclosporin A group than in the placebo group, especially renal dysfunction (Peto odds ratio 5.56, 95% CI 2.52 to 12.27) and hypertension (SMD 0.88, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.48).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence supporting or refuting that cyclosporin A may delay death, death or liver transplantation, or progression of primary biliary cirrhosis. Cyclosporin A caused more adverse events than placebo, like renal dysfunction and hypertension. We do not recommend the use of cyclosporin A outside randomised clinical trials.

Azathioprine for primary biliary cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Azathioprine is used for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis, but the therapeutic responses in randomised clinical trials have been conflicting.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of azathioprine for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Randomised clinical trials were identified by searching The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, The Chinese Biomedical Database, and LILACS, and manual searches of bibliographies to September 2005.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials comparing azathioprine versus placebo, no intervention, or another drug were included irrespective of blinding, language, year of publication, and publication status.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Our primary outcomes were mortality, and mortality or liver transplantation. Dichotomous outcomes were reported as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Continuous outcomes were reported as weighted mean difference (WMD) or standardised mean difference (SMD). We examined the intervention effects by random-effects and fixed-effect models.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified two randomised clinical trials with 293 patients. Only one of the trials was regarded as having low bias risk. Azathioprine did not significantly decrease mortality (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.31, 2 trials). Azathioprine did not improve pruritus at one-year intervention (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.84, 1 trial), cirrhosis development, or quality of life. Patients given azathioprine experienced significantly more adverse events than patients given no intervention or placebo (RR 2.44, 95% CI 1.14 to 5.20, 2 trials). The common adverse events were rash, severe diarrhoea, and bone marrow depression.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence to support the use of azathioprine for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. Researchers who are interested in performing further randomised clinical trials should be aware of the risks of adverse events.

Risk of lymphoma in primary biliary cirrhosis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

A number of immunosuppressive therapies have not been associated with clinical benefit in primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). The use of more potent immunomodulatory therapies, however, could raise concerns over the risk of adverse effects such as the development of lymphoma. Therefore, we sought to describe the frequency, clinical spectrum, and outcomes among patients with PBC and a concomitant diagnosis of lymphoma.

METHODS

Patients with PBC evaluated at the Mayo Clinic between January 1, 1976-December 31, 1997 comprised the study cohort. Medical records were abstracted for demographic and clinical information including the temporal relationship between diagnoses and potential risk factors for lymphoma.

RESULTS

From a total of 2192 patients, the frequency of lymphoma was observed at 0.6% (13 cases). The majority of patients (54%) had PBC before they were diagnosed with lymphoma, whereas 23% of cases were diagnosed in conjunction with PBC. Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (69%) was observed in most cases with disease involvement above the diaphragm (38%). Treatment in the form of chemotherapy (n = 3), radiation (n = 2), and surgery (n = 6) was provided for 11 patients. Seven (54%) patients did not have evidence for recurrent disease, whereas 3 (23%) patients died of progressive lymphoma.

CONCLUSIONS

The baseline risk for lymphoma in patients with PBC is estimated at <1%. Clinical trials with potent immunosuppressive therapies for PBC should not be prohibited on the basis of concerns regarding a baseline predisposition for lymphoma in this population.

Methotrexate therapy for the symptomatic treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis patients, who are biochemical incomplete responders to ursodeoxycholic acid therapy

BACKGROUND

Ursodeoxycholic acid is widely used as the standard therapy for the treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis and other cholestatic liver diseases. Although it has been shown to improve biochemical markers and delay disease progression, its effect upon fatigue and pruritus, is at best uncertain.

AIM

To assess the safety and efficacy of methotrexate for treating symptomatic primary biliary cirrhosis patients who were biochemical partial responders or non-responders to ursodeoxycholic acid therapy.

METHODS

We treated eight consecutive primary biliary cirrhosis patients with methotrexate who were followed in a single hepatology clinical practice, who were symptomatic, and who had had an incomplete biochemical response to ursodeoxycholic acid therapy. Pruritus and fatigue were assessed at each clinic visit and graded from 0 (asymptomatic) to 4 (incapacitating).

RESULTS

The median dose of methotrexate was 13.75 mg/week (range 7.5-15) and the mean duration of methotrexate therapy was 49 months (range 11-126). At the end of follow-up pruritus in six of seven patients had improved, and fatigue in all patients had improved with the addition of methotrexate therapy (pruritus: baseline 2.9 +/- 1.1 vs. end of treatment 0.6 +/- 1.5, P < or = 0.0175, and fatigue: baseline 3.0 +/- 0.8, vs. end of treatment 1.0 +/- 0.8, P < or = 0.0023). Improvement in symptoms was associated with a significant improvement in biochemical markers of cholestasis. No significant adverse effects of methotrexate were documented.

CONCLUSIONS

Methotrexate should be considered as a potential additive treatment for symptomatic primary biliary cirrhosis patients who are incomplete biochemical responders to ursodeoxycholic acid therapy.

Methotrexate (MTX) plus ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in the treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis

This placebo-controlled, randomized, multicenter trial compared the effects of MTX plus UDCA to UDCA alone on the course of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). Two hundred and sixty five AMA positive patients without ascites, variceal bleeding, or encephalopathy; a serum bilirubin less than 3 mg/dL; serum albumin 3 g/dL or greater, who had taken UDCA 15 mg/kg daily for at least 6 months, were stratified by Ludwig's histological staging and then randomized to MTX 15 mg/m2 body surface area (maximum dose 20 mg) once a week while continuing on UDCA. The median time from randomization to closure of the study was 7.6 years (range: 4.6-8.8 years). Treatment failure was defined as death without liver transplantation; transplantation; variceal bleeding; development of ascites, encephalopathy, or varices; a doubling of serum bilirubin to 2.5 mg/dL or greater; a fall in serum albumin to 2.5 g/dL or less; histological progression by at least two stages or to cirrhosis. Patients were continued on treatment despite failure of treatment, unless transplantation ensued, drug toxicity necessitated withdrawal, or the patient developed a cancer. There were no significant differences in these parameters nor to the time of development of treatment failures observed for patients taking UDCA plus MTX, or UDCA plus placebo. The trial was conducted with a stopping rule, and was stopped early by the National Institutes of Health at the advice of our Data Safety Monitoring Board for reasons of futility. In conclusion, methotrexate when added to UDCA for a median period of 7.6 years had no effect on the course of PBC treated with UDCA alone.

Methotrexate for primary biliary cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Methotrexate, a folic acid antagonist with immunosuppressive properties, has been used to treat patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. The therapeutic responses to methotrexate in randomised clinical trials have been heterogeneous.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of methotrexate for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Relevant randomised clinical trials were identified by searching The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register (June 2004), The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials on The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2004), MEDLINE (January 1966 to August 2004), EMBASE (January 1980 to August 2004), and manual searches of bibliographies. We contacted authors of trials and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials comparing methotrexate with placebo, no intervention, or another drug were included irrespective of blinding, language, year of publication, and publication status.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Our primary outcomes were mortality and mortality or liver transplantation. Dichotomous outcomes were reported as relative risk (RR) and hazard ratio (HR) if applicable. Continuous outcomes were reported as weighted mean difference (WMD). We examined intervention effects by using both a random-effects model and a fixed-effect model. Heterogeneity was investigated by subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified four trials (370 patients) that compared methotrexate with placebo with or without ursodeoxycholic acid as co-intervention. One additional trial (87 patients) compared methotrexate with colchicine without and later with ursodeoxycholic acid as co-intervention. The methodological quality of the trials was low. We did not find significant effects of methotrexate on pruritus, fatigue, liver complications, liver biochemistry, liver histology, or adverse events. The pruritus score (WMD - 0.68, 95% CI - 1.11 to - 0.25), the levels of serum alkaline phosphatases (WMD - 0.41, 95% CI - 0.70 to - 0.12) and plasma immunoglobulin M (WMD - 0.47, 95% CI - 0.74 to - 0.20) were significantly lower in the patients receiving methotrexate.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Methotrexate increased mortality in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. We do not recommend methotrexate for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis outside randomised trials.

Glucocorticosteroids for primary biliary cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Primary biliary cirrhosis is a chronic progressive cholestatic liver disease of presumed autoimmune etiology, characterised by the destruction of small intrahepatic bile ducts and the eventual development of cirrhosis and liver failure. Its progression may be influenced by immunosuppression. Glucocorticosteroids are potent immunosuppressive agents, but they are associated with significant adverse effects, including osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically evaluate the beneficial and harmful effects of glucocorticosteroids versus placebo or no intervention for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Controlled Trials Register,The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the full text of the identified studies were searched until June 2004. The search strategy included terms for primary biliary cirrhosis and glucocorticosteroids (including the names of frequently used preparations). Previous research groups and manufacturers were contacted for additional references. No language restrictions were applied.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Double-blind, single-blind, or unblinded randomised clinical trials evaluating any preparation of glucocorticosteroids versus placebo or no intervention in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis diagnosed by abnormal liver function tests and either anti-mitochondrial antibodies or histology were included. Additional agents were allowed if they were administered to both groups equally.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The quality of the randomised clinical trials was evaluated by methodology components (generation of allocation sequence; allocation concealment; blinding; follow up). Analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat method with missing data being accounted for by imputation.

MAIN RESULTS

Only two underpowered trials (reporting 36 and 40 patients) were identified. These differed markedly in their inclusion criteria and treatment protocols. Both stated that they used placebo. However, allocation concealment was unclear. Only one trial reported any patient deaths. No significant improvement in mortality was identified (odds ratio (OR) 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.10 to 1.76). Improvements in serum markers of liver inflammation and liver histology were identified. Potentially prognostically linked markers such as bilirubin and albumin were incompletely reported. Bone mineral density (weighted mean difference -2.84%, 95% CI -4.16 to -1.53) and the number of patients with any adverse event (OR 8.99, 95% CI 2.15 to 37.58) were significantly increased in the glucocorticosteroid group.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient data to support or reject the use of glucocorticosteroids for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. It may be appropriate to consider a large prospective randomised clinical trial on this topic.

D-penicillamine for primary biliary cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

D-penicillamine is used for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis due to its hepatic copper decreasing and immunomodulatory potentials. The results from randomised clinical trials have been inconsistent.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review the beneficial and harmful effects of D-penicillamine for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We identified trials through electronic searches of The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register (September 2003), The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials on The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2003), MEDLINE (January 1966 to September 2003), EMBASE (January 1980 to September 2003), The Chinese Biomedical CD Database (January 1979 to August 2003), and LILACS (1982 to 2003); through manual searches of bibliographies; and by contacting authors of the trials and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised clinical trials comparing D-penicillamine with placebo/no intervention or other control intervention irrespective of language, year of publication, and publication status.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of the trials and extracted data, validated by a third reviewer. The primary outcomes were 1) mortality and 2) a combination of those who died or underwent liver transplantation. We analysed dichotomous outcomes as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) by a fixed effect model and a random effects model. We investigated sources of heterogeneity by subgroup analyses and tested the robustness of our findings by sensitivity analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

We included seven trials randomising 706 patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. D-penicillamine compared with placebo/no intervention tended to increase mortality (RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.64, fixed; RR 1.46, 95% CI 0.85 to 2.50, random). However, there was substantial heterogeneity. No significant differences were detected regarding the risks of mortality or liver transplantation, pruritus, liver complications, progression of liver histological stage, or the levels of liver biochemical variables (except alanine aminotransferase). D-penicillamine versus placebo/no intervention significantly increased the risk of adverse events (RR 3.11, 95% CI 2.33 to 4.16, fixed; RR 4.18, 95% CI 1.38 to 12.69, random).

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

D-penicillamine did not appear to reduce the risk of mortality, but significantly increased the occurrences of adverse events in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. We do not support the use of D-penicillamine for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.

A randomized controlled trial of colchicine plus ursodiol versus methotrexate plus ursodiol in primary biliary cirrhosis: ten-year results

Primary biliary cirrhosis frequently progresses despite treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), the only approved therapy. Previous studies suggested that colchicine and methotrexate may improve biochemical tests of liver function, symptoms, and liver histology. The aim of the present study was to determine if the addition of colchicine or methotrexate to UDCA would improve survival free of liver transplantation. Eighty-five patients with histologically confirmed primary biliary cirrhosis whose serum alkaline phosphatase levels were at least twice the normal level and who were not yet candidates for liver transplantation were randomly assigned to receive colchicine or methotrexate in a double-blind study. UDCA was administered to all patients after 2 years. The primary end point was survival free of liver transplantation. Patients were followed up for a total of up to 10 years or until treatment failure. Data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. Transplant-free survival was similar in both groups: 0.57 for colchicine plus UDCA and 0.44 for methotrexate plus UDCA, results that are similar to those predicted by the Mayo prognostic model. Significant improvement in liver biochemical tests and liver histology was observed in a subset of patients in both treatment groups who remained in the study for all 10 years. In conclusion, neither colchcine plus UDCA nor methotrexate plus UDCA improved survival beyond that predicted by the Mayo prognostic model. However, clinical, histologic, and biochemical improvement observed among those who remained in the study for 10 years suggests a possible benefit of these drugs in a subset of patients.

Colchicine for primary biliary cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Colchicine has been used for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis because of its immunomodulatory and antifibrotic potential. The therapeutical responses to colchicine in randomised clinical trials were inconsistent.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the beneficial and harmful effects of colchicine in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We identified trials through electronic searches of The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials on The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE (September 2003), and manual searches of bibliographies. We contacted authors of trials and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials comparing colchicine with any kind of control therapy were included irrespective of language, year of publication, and publication status.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcomes were the number of deaths and the number of death and/or patients who underwent liver transplantation. Dichotomous outcomes were reported as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). We examined intervention effects by using both a fixed effect model and a random effects model. Heterogeneity was investigated by subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

Eleven randomised clinical trials involving 716 patients with primary biliary cirrhosis fulfilled the inclusion criteria. No significant differences were detected between colchicine and placebo/no intervention on the number of deaths (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.71 to 2.06), the number of deaths and/or patients who underwent liver transplantation (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.49), liver complications, liver biochemical variables, liver histological measurements, and adverse events. Trial methodology was generally low and some trials had high drop-out rate. A best-worst-case-scenario analysis showed no significant effect of colchicine on mortality (RR 0.59, 95%CI 0.30 to 1.15), while a worst-best-case-scenario analysis showed a significant detrimental effect of colchicine on mortality (RR 2.28, 95% CI 1.17 to 4.44). Colchicine significantly decreased the number of patients without improvement of pruritus (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.87). However, this estimate was based on only 156 patients from three trials. The effect of the combined treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid was not significantly different from that of colchicine alone.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

We did not find evidence either to support or refute the use of colchicine for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. As we are not able to exclude a detrimental effect of colchicine, we suggest that it is only used in randomised clinical trials.

Primary biliary cirrhosis: specific treatment

No single agent or combination of agents has been shown to unequivocally delay the need for liver transplantation or reduce mortality in patients with PBC. Given this uncertainty, what, if any, specific therapy should be recommended? The agents with the strongest scientific proof of efficacy in well-designed clinical trials are ursodiol, azathioprine, and cyclosporine. Ursodiol is clearly the least toxic of these three. Other agents, such as methotrexate, have shown impressive results in anecdotal studies but have never been adequately tested in randomized clinical trials. Thus, based on the current evidence, imperfect as it is, ursodiol appears to be the safest and potentiaily the most effective specific therapy for patients with PBC. Azathioprine and methotrexate may be the best alternatives for patients who cannot tolerate or do not respond to ursodiol therapy, primarily because their safety has been established in large and lengthy clinical trials. Cylosporine could be considered in patients who fail other treatments (Table 3). We can hope that a safe, highly-effective treatment for patients with PBC will ultimately be discovered. Trials to unequivocally demonstrate the efficacy of new agents will have to be extremely well designed, however, and will require large numbers of patients followed for an extended period of time.

Methotrexate-Induced Pulmonary Injury: Serial CT findings

We describe serial computed tomographic (CT) findings of methotrexate (MTX)-induced pulmonary injury.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The cases of 8 patients (3 men and 5 women; mean age 58.6 years, range 16 to 75 years) of clinically diagnosed MTX-induced pulmonary injury were reviewed. Six patients had rheumatoid arthritis, 1 had lupus erythematosus profundus, and 1 had juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. CT findings on admission and at follow-up were evaluated.

RESULTS

The most common CT features were diffuse and patchy bilateral ground-glass opacity with (n = 3) or without reticulation (n = 4) and consolidation (n = 1). These opacities showed no predilection for any particular lung zone in 6 patients but did show dependent predilection in 1 patient and upper lobe predilection in 1. Diffuse centrilobular ill-defined nodules were noted in 1 patient, which disappeared on follow-up. During the average post-treatment follow-up period of 31.0 days (range 3 to 76 days), the opacities quickly improved after treatment in 6 patients; however, in 2 patients with pre-existing interstitial pneumonitis the opacities were refractory.

CONCLUSION

CT features of MTX-induced pulmonary injury were variable and included diffuse parenchymal opacification, reticular opacities, and centrilobular nodules. These opacities usually responded quickly to treatment; however, those patients with lung fibrosis at presentation may have worse prognosis.

Primary biliary cirrhosis

Primary biliary cirrhosis is a chronic cholestatic liver disease of adults. This disorder is characterised histologically by chronic non-suppurative destruction of interlobular bile ducts leading to advanced fibrosis, cirrhosis, and liver failure. The precise aetiopathogenesis of primary biliary cirrhosis remains unknown, although dysregulation of the immune system and genetic susceptibility both seem to be important. Affected patients are typically middle-aged women with abnormal serum concentrations of alkaline phosphatase. Presence of antimitochondrial antibody in serum is almost diagnostic of the disorder. Identification of primary biliary cirrhosis is important, because effective treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid has been shown to halt disease progression and improve survival without need for liver transplantation. However, therapeutic options for disease-related complications-including fatigue and metabolic bone disease-remain unavailable. Mathematical models have been developed that accurately predict the natural history of primary biliary cirrhosis in individuals. Despite advances in understanding of the disease, it remains one of the major indications for liver transplantation worldwide.

Review article: pruritus in cholestatic and other liver diseases

Pruritus is often the most troublesome symptom in patients with chronic liver disease, particularly when cholestasis is a prominent feature. The exact pathogenesis is unknown, but empirical treatment, such as cholestyramine, based on a liver-based origin of pruritus, has been used for many years. Recently, evidence for a central mechanism for pruritus has been obtained and opioid antagonists have been tried clinically with some benefit, but their use is not widespread. In addition, the pruritus associated with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy can now be alleviated in many cases by ursodeoxycholic acid. As it also improves foetal outcome, this should become first-line therapy. We review the pathogenesis and therapy of pruritus, highlighting practical aspects to help with patients with seemingly intractable pruritus.

Methotrexate therapy for primary biliary cirrhosis

OBJECTIVE

Preliminary data suggested possible benefits of methotrexate in primary biliary cirrhosis. We assessed the effectiveness of methotrexate use in primary biliary cirrhosis and its tolerance in patients with this disease.

METHODS

A total of 110 primary biliary cirrhosis patients began methotrexate 15 mg/wk; for most, ursodeoxycholic acid was added during the study. We analyzed data from patients completing 5 yr of treatment with methotrexate to assess its effect on biochemical and histologic parameters after 5 yr of therapy. Based on an intent to treat analysis, we also compared survival of our patients (n = 110) with that of patients in a previously published, placebo-controlled trial of ursodeoxycholic acid (n = 180).

RESULTS

Only half of the study group completed 5 yr of methotrexate therapy. Therapy did not prevent progression of disease, as indicated by a rising Mayo risk score. Portal fibrosis tended to remain the same. Methotrexate did not diminish the risk of death or liver transplantation when compared with ursodeoxycholic acid or placebo; however, ursodeoxycholic acid use decreased the risk of death or transplant (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Methotrexate is not well tolerated in primary biliary cirrhosis. The toxicity of methotrexate and its inability to prevent complications of progressive liver disease or improve survival and the need for liver transplantation limits its utility. The benefits of ursodeoxycholic acid were again confirmed.

Ursodeoxycholic acid for primary biliary cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Primary biliary cirrhosis is a rare autoimmune liver disease and an effective treatment has been difficult to establish. Some randomised clinical trials have found an effect of ursodeoxycholic acid for primary biliary cirrhosis.

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate the beneficial effects and adverse effects of peroral ursodeoxycholic acid for primary biliary cirrhosis versus placebo or no intervention.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Controlled Trials Register of The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group, The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and the full text of the identified studies were searched until April 2001. The electronic searches were done by entering the search terms 'ursodeoxycholic acid', 'UDCA', 'primary biliary cirrhosis', and 'PBC'.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials evaluating ursodeoxycholic acid administered perorally at any dose versus placebo or no intervention in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis diagnosed by any method. Only trials using an adequate method for randomisation were included, regardless of blinding and language.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The methodologic quality of the randomised clinical trials was evaluated by components and the Jadad-score. The following outcomes were extracted: mortality, liver transplantation, pruritus, other clinical symptoms (jaundice, portal pressure, (bleeding) oesophageal varices, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, hepato-renal syndrome, autoimmune conditions), liver biochemistry, liver function, liver biopsy findings, quality of life, and adverse events. All analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat method.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 16 randomised clinical trials evaluating ursodeoxycholic acid against placebo (n = 15) or no intervention (n = 1) in 1422 patients were identified. The median Jadad-score was 3 (range 1-5). A number of trials described as double blind had problems with the blinding. Neither mortality (odds ratio = 0.94; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60 to 1.48), liver transplantation (odds ratio = 0.83; 95% CI 0.52 to 1.32), mortality or liver transplantation (odds ratio = 0.90; 95% CI 0.65 to 1.26), pruritus, fatigue, autoimmune conditions, quality of life, liver histology, or portal pressure were significantly affected by ursodeoxycholic acid (given in doses of 8-15 mg/kg/day for three months to five years). However, ursodeoxycholic acid significantly (P < 0.05) reduced ascites, jaundice, and biochemical variables such as serum bilirubin and liver enzymes. Ursodeoxycholic acid was not significantly associated with adverse events. Including data after patients had been switched onto open label ursodeoxycholic acid confirmed the findings regarding the lack of a significant effect of ursodeoxycholic acid on mortality and mortality or liver transplantation. A significant (P = 0.04) effect was, however, observed on the incidence of liver transplantation (odds ratio = 0.68; 95% CI 0.48 to 0.98).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Ursodeoxycholic acid has a marginal therapeutic effect for primary biliary cirrhosis. On the positive side, ursodeoxycholic acid has few side effects. The general usage of ursodeoxycholic acid for primary biliary cirrhosis needs reevaluation.

Management of primary biliary cirrhosis. The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases practice guidelines

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is a presumed autoimmune disease of the liver, which predominantly affects women once over the age of 20 years. Most cases are diagnosed when asymptomatic (60%). The antimitochondrial antibody is present in serum in most, but not in all, patients with PBC. The disease generally progresses slowly but survival is less than an age- and gender-matched general population. The symptomatic patient may have fatigue, generalized pruritus, portal hypertension, osteoporosis, skin xanthomata, fat soluble vitamin deficiencies, and/or recurrent asymptomatic urinary tract infections. Many nonhepatic autoimmune diseases are found in association with PBC and may prompt initial presentation. To date, immunosuppressive therapy has not been shown to prolong survival in PBC. The hydrophilic bile acid, ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), has been shown when given in a dose of 13 to 15 mg/kg daily for up to 4 years to delay the time to liver transplantation or death. This therapy also causes a significant improvement of all the biochemical markers of cholestasis but has no beneficial effects on any of the symptoms or associated disorders. Treatment with UDCA does not obviate the need for liver transplantation. Therapies to prevent complications arising from malabsorption, portal hypertension, and/or osteoporosis are required as well. Good control of pruritus can be achieved in most patients. PBC is diagnosed with increasing frequency, but the agent(s) responsible for this slowly progressive destruction of the interlobular bile ducts remains elusive and hence a specific therapy remains unavailable.

Primary biliary cirrhosis: new perspectives in diagnosis and treatment

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterised by cholestatic liver function tests, antimitochondrial antibodies, and abnormal liver histology. Early descriptions of a rare rapidly progressive disease no longer reflect the more indolent progress often seen today. Many patients have significant long term morbidity through symptoms such as fatigue and itch with a minority progressing to liver failure and need for transplantation. The current data on the diagnosis, clinical progression, and treatment of PBC are reviewed.

A prospective trial of colchicine and methotrexate in the treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The aim of this study was to determine if colchicine or methotrexate improves blood test results, symptoms, and/or liver histology in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.

METHODS

Patients with histologically confirmed primary biliary cirrhosis whose serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels were at least 2 times above normal and who were not yet candidates for liver transplantation received colchicine or methotrexate and were followed up for 2 years.

RESULTS

In patients receiving colchicine (n = 43), mean pruritus score decreased from 1.63 to 1.12 (P = 0.04), ALP level from 494 to 355 U/L (P < 0.0001), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level from 79 to 61 U/L (P < 0.0001). In patients receiving methotrexate (n = 42), pruritus score decreased from 1.25 to 0.44 (P = 0.0001), ALP from 478 to 235 U/L (P < 0.0001), and ALT from 96 to 61 U/L (P = 0.0001). Methotrexate but not colchicine significantly improved liver histology (P = 0.005) and serum immunoglobulin G levels (P = 0.0002). Methotrexate improved most blood test results more than colchicine. Serum bilirubin levels increased slightly with each drug, and albumin levels decreased slightly.

CONCLUSIONS

Both colchicine and methotrexate improved biochemical test results and symptoms in primary biliary cirrhosis, but the response to methotrexate was greater.

Primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis

Primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis are the most common chronic cholestatic liver diseases in adults that lead to biliary cirrhosis and its inherent complications such as portal hypertension and liver failure. Although important advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis of these conditions have been accomplished in the last two decades, much work is needed to uncover the interaction of genetic and immunologic mechanisms involved in their pathogenesis. Ursodeoxycholic acid at dosage of 13 to 15 mg/kg/d is the only agent that can currently be recommended in the treatment of PBC. No medical therapy aimed at disrupting disease progression is available for patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis, although several agents with different properties are currently under evaluation. Liver transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis with end-stage liver disease.

Methotrexate improves biochemical tests in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis who respond incompletely to ursodiol

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is a chronic cholestatic liver disease of presumed autoimmune etiology. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), methotrexate, and colchicine each have shown promise in its treatment. The value of combining 2 or 3 of these drugs is uncertain. The aim of this study was to determine whether addition of methotrexate to the treatment regimen improves results of liver biochemical tests in patients with antimitochondrial antibody-positive PBC who responded incompletely to treatment with UDCA and colchicine.

METHODS

Methotrexate was added to the treatment regimen of 10 consecutive patients with antimitochondrial antibody-positive PBC who had an incomplete response to therapy with UDCA alone or in combination with colchicine. The primary end point was biochemical response. Symptoms and histological changes were also recorded.

RESULTS

Addition of methotrexate to the UDCA plus colchicine regimen was associated with a significant reduction in serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels beyond those found with UDCA and colchicine alone or in combination. Median ALP concentration was 389 IU (range, 247-1013 IU) at baseline, 300 IU (range, 155-467 IU) after treatment with UDCA plus colchicine, and 120 IU (range, 66-351 IU) after treatment with methotrexate.

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of methotrexate to a regimen of UDCA and colchicine may be beneficial for patients with PBC who respond incompletely to treatment with UDCA and colchicine.

Low-dose methotrexate is ineffective in primary biliary cirrhosis: long-term results of a placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND & AIMS

New treatments for primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) need to be evaluated. We conducted a single-center double-blind, randomized trial of methotrexate, 7.5 mg/wk (n = 30), vs. placebo (n = 30) for up to 6 years in PBC.

METHODS

Methods included three monthly symptom assessment and liver function tests and liver biopsy and gastroscopy at baseline, after 2 years, and after 4-6 years.

RESULTS

Patients randomized to methotrexate had, compared with patients randomized to placebo, (1) significantly lower on-treatment serum alkaline phosphatase, gamma-glutamyltransferase, immunoglobulin (Ig) M, IgG, and (after 24 months) aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels (P < 0.02-0.001 by analysis of covariance to adjust for baseline differences); (2) a nonsignificant trend toward lower on-treatment pruritus scores; (3) similar on-treatment Knodell inflammatory scores but nonsignificant trends toward lower Knodell fibrosis score and less ductopenia; (4) a trend toward greater increases in serum bilirubin level and Mayo score with time (both significant after 5 years of follow-up); and (5) a 2.9-fold (95% confidence interval, 0.85-10.25-fold) increase the rate of death or liver transplantation as a result of liver disease during or after the trial (P = 0.09) in a Cox multivariate regression analysis compared with patients randomized to placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

These results do not support the clinical use of low-dose methotrexate in PBC.

Optimal timing of liver transplantation for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis: use of prognostic modelling

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Liver transplantation remains the only definitive treatment for patients with end-stage primary biliary cirrhosis, although the optimal timing of the procedure remains uncertain. The aim of the study was to use prognostic modelling to determine the optimal timing of transplantation for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.

METHODS

A prognostic model for predicting the survival of patients after transplantation was generated using the Cox regression model with data from 312 patients transplanted for primary biliary cirrhosis at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham. The prognosis after transplantation was compared to that without transplantation (using a previously published prognostic index for non-transplantation) both in these patients and in 98 non-transplanted primary biliary cirrhosis patients dying from the liver disease, in order to establish at what stage the prognosis with transplantation was better than without transplantation.

RESULTS

The prognostic index for transplantation included the following significant prognostic variables: serum bilirubin, serum albumin, age, year of transplantation, and the presence of ascites or treatment with diuretics. Comparison of prognosis with and without transplantation showed that the predicted gain in survival after transplantation becomes increasingly positive when the 6-month survival probability in the absence of transplantation falls below 0.85. In the non-transplanted patients this occurs on average about 8 months before death.

CONCLUSIONS

Comparison of the prognosis with and without transplantation provides a rational method for determining the optimum timing of the procedure which occurs approximately when the predicted 6-month survival probability without transplantation falls below 0.85.

Successful treatment of refractory type 1 autoimmune hepatitis with methotrexate

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Autoimmune hepatitis is a heterogeneous disorder that typically responds to glucocorticoids with or without azathioprine. Treatment options for patients not responding to standard therapy are limited.

METHODS

We describe a 52-year-old female who presented with jaundice, marked elevation in liver enzymes, positive antinuclear antibody and a liver biopsy consistent with autoimmune hepatitis. Liver enzymes did not normalize with prednisone alone. When azathioprine was added, the disease flared. The patient refused cyclosporine. Methotrexate 7.5 mg po per week resulted in normalization of liver enzymes, improved liver histology, and has maintained remission with a steroid-sparing effect.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

In this patient methotrexate was used successfully to treat type 1 autoimmune hepatitis. This suggests that methotrexate may have a role in treatment of autoimmune hepatitis refractory to standard therapy.

Management of primary biliary cirrhosis and autoimmune cholangitis

Several drugs have been evaluated in the treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis over a number of years. These drugs have immunosuppressive, antiinflammatory, cupruretic, antifibrotic and bile acid properties. Ursodeoxycholic acid has been shown to improve survival free of transplantation in a conclusive fashion. This drug is the single agent that can be recommended for the treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis. Corticosteroid therapy and ursodeoxycholic acid have been evaluated in a few patients with autoimmune cholangitis. This article reviews a large number of studies that have been published assessing different drugs in the treatment of these two entities, particularly in the treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis.

The pruritus of cholestasis: evolving pathogenic concepts suggest new therapeutic options

Pruritus is a distressing symptom experienced by a large proportion of patients with cholestasis. The cause of this form of pruritus is unknown, and therapy tends to be empirical and unsatisfactory. This article discusses the emerging role of the brain and neurotransmitter systems in the pathogenesis of the pruritus of cholestasis and emphasizes the importance of the application of quantitative methodology in clinical trials of therapies for the pruritus of cholestasis.

Methotrexate use in miscellaneous inflammatory diseases

Methotrexate has proven to be a safe, effective, long-term therapy for rheumatoid arthritis. Its property as a corticosteroid-sparing drug in rheumatoid arthritis has been recognized and its potential has been explored in other inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. This article describes and analyzes the use of methotrexate for a wide variety of diseases, some of which are not the usual province of rheumatologists, to provide some guidance concerning its role for treatment. Methotrexate therapy seems promising for systemic lupus erythematosus, inflammatory myopathy, inflammatory eye disease, inflammatory bowel disease, and some manifestations of sarcoidosis. Its role in other diseases is not as well defined.

The combination of ursodeoxycholic acid and methotrexate for primary biliary cirrhosis is not better than ursodeoxycholic acid alone

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Many therapies have been tried in primary biliary cirrhosis. It has been suggested that a combination of ursodeoxycholic acid and methotrexate may offer advantages. Because the benefit and safety of this combination is uncertain, we conducted this prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients with well-defined primary biliary cirrhosis were randomly assigned to receive either ursodeoxycholic acid (500 mg/day) plus methotrexate (10 mg/week) or ursodeoxycholic acid plus placebo for a period of 48 weeks. Clinical, biochemical and histologic evolution were assessed.

RESULTS

In both groups the clinical response was similar and heterogeneous. In patients of ursodeoxycholic acid alone group, biochemical and histologic changes were comparable to those of patients of ursodeoxycholic acid plus methotrexate at 48 weeks. The addition of methotrexate was not associated with substantial adverse affects.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of methotrexate in combination with ursodeoxycholic acid was not followed by an additive benefit over ursodeoxycholic acid alone, nor was substantial toxicity added. Unless larger and longer controlled trials with clinical, biochemical and histologic controls show it to be a safe and effective therapy for primary biliary cirrhosis, ursodeoxycholic acid+methotrexate should not be used as a proven and accepted treatment.

Methotrexate for psoriasis

Methotrexate is an effective antipsoriatic agent and has been widely used to treat severe psoriasis since the 1960s. It is especially useful in acute generalized pustular psoriasis, psoriatic erythroderma, psoriatic arthritis and for extensive chronic plaque psoriasis in patients who are inadequately controlled by topical therapy alone. It has not, however, been formally compared with other systemic treatments for severe psoriasis such as cyclosporin, retinoids or photochemotherapy with psoralen and UVA (PUVA), but in comparison with these other therapies it is inexpensive, with correct use, its safety profile is favourable. In summary, therefore, it can be used as a short-term option to gain control of unstable psoriasis such as pustular psoriasis or erythroderma before returning to other modes of treatment, or more often, as long-term maintenance treatment. The most important potential side-effect is acute myelosuppression, which is the cause of most of the rare deaths attributable to this therapy for psoriasis. Myelosuppression is more likely in the elderly, in patients with renal impairment and/or folate depletion, and with overdose or drug interactions. Long-term therapy carries with it a risk of liver fibrosis which is related to the dosage regimen employed, and is increased by exposure to other hepatic toxins, particularly alcohol. The correlation between the risk of development of liver fibrosis, cumulative lifetime dose and duration of treatment with methotrexate is not clear-cut, but may have been overstated in some studies.

Diagnosis and therapy of cholestatic liver disease

The majority of cholestatic liver diseases can be diagnosed with a carefully performed history taking, physical examination, and appropriate imaging studies. In a minority of cases, however, liver biopsy may be necessary to establish the diagnosis. In addition to the treatment of the specific liver disease, therapy should address the management of complications unique to cholestasis and progressive liver failure.

The pruritus of cholestasis

The pruritus of cholestasis is a difficult clinical problem to manage. The pathogenesis of this symptom is unknown. All conventional therapies have been unsuccessful in isolating a particular group of substances that could be implicated as direct or indirect causative agents. It should be emphasized that nonspecific treatment modalities that lower the plasma concentrations of a variety of substances (such as cholestyramine, colestipol, charcoal hemoperfusion, plasmapheresis, partial external diversion of bile, and drugs that induce hepatic enzymes), can potentially ameliorate the pruritus of cholestasis by lowering the circulating levels of an undefined pruritogen or a factor responsible for inducing the primary mechanism of the pruritus. The encouraging results reported by the use of antibiotic therapy for this condition merits investigation. Increased opioidergic neurotransmission is part of the syndrome of cholestasis and it contributes, at least in part, to the pruritus associated with it. Opiate antagonists seem to be an effective alternative therapy for some patients. Recent preliminary reports suggest that other neurotransmitter systems, eg, serotoninergic, may be involved in the pruritus of cholestasis. The need for quantitation of scratching activity cannot be over emphasized. The use of quantitative methodology offers the opportunity to facilitate the study of scratching behavior that is a biological phenomenon secondary to liver disease.