Long-term nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and gastroduodenal injury: the role of Helicobacter pylori

Potential risk factors and prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection among adult patients with dyspepsia symptoms in Cameroon

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori is a Gram negative bacterium that colonizes the stomach of approximately two-thirds of the human population and it is involved in the pathogenesis of gastroduodenal diseases. This study sought to determine potential risk factors associated with seroprevalence of H. pylori among dyspepsia patients in Cameroon for a better management of the disease.

METHODS

The study was carried out from August to December 2014 at Laquintinie Hospital and District Hospital of Bonassama in Douala metropolis. 205 patients (127 women and 78 men; mean age, 53.79 ± 11.11 years; range, 35-75 years) were enrolled. Each subject gave a written consent. The study was approved by the local Ethical Committee of Medical Sciences. A structured questionnaire was used to collect information on sociodemographic parameters and predisposing risk factors for Helicobacter pylori infection. For each patient, body mass index (BMI) and direct inquiry about dyspeptic symptoms were done. Blood samples were tested for H. pylori antibodies, and ABO/Rhesus blood group antigen typing was performed.

RESULTS

The overall prevalence was 64.39%. All patients with upper abdominal pains and frequent burping were H. pylori seropositive. We found that infection takes place early in childhood and adolescence, and reaches its peak at adulthood at 35 to 44 years. Sixty-two percent of women over 68 of men were infected. 80.39% of patients with family history of gastric cancer were seropositive, while 19.60% were seronegative (p = 0.001). Prevalence of 79.09 and 47.4% was recorded respectively for subjects with low, middle and high income levels (p = 0.001). H. pylori infection rate was 60.48% in blood group O patients compared with 70.37% in other blood groups (p = 0.203). 73% of infected subjects over 59% of uninfected ones currently take NSAIDs (p = 0.0509). Overcrowded households have a higher rate of 65.32% seropositivity in contrast with a lower rate of 33.33% from norm household (p = 0.197). 69.29% of obese and overweight patients versus 58.24% of subjects with normal weight were seropositive (P = 0.215).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study demonstrate that low income, family history of gastric cancer, clinical symptoms of nausea/vomiting and flatulence/bloating were risk factors of H. pylori infection in this population.

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection reduces the incidence of peptic ulcer disease in patients using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a meta-analysis

AIM

To investigate the association between use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) and Helicobacter pylori infection, interactive effect of H. pylori infection and NSAID use on the development of peptic ulcer disease (PUD), and the effect of H. pylori eradication therapy on PUD development.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search in EMBASE and PubMed for relevant articles published in English between January 1989 and August 2010, with the following MeSH and/or key words: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or NSAIDs, Helicobacter pylori, or H. pylori, peptic ulcer disease or PUD, and randomized-control study or clinical trial. The meta-analysis was conducted using the Review Manager 4.2.2.

RESULTS

In the analysis of five studies, the pooled prevalence of H. pylori infection was 74.5% and 71.1% in NSAID users and non-NSAID users, respectively, (OR = 0.65; 95% CI: 0.35-1.20, p = .170). In the analysis of nine studies, the pooled prevalence of PUD in NSAID users was 31.2% and 17.9% in the presence and absence of H. pylori infection, respectively, (OR = 3.08; 95% CI: 1.26-7.55, p = .010). Moreover, in the analysis of seven studies, PUD developed in 6.4% and 11.8% of NSAID users with and without eradication therapy, respectively (OR = 0.50; 95% CI: 0.36-0.74, p < .001). The preventive effect of the eradication therapy was further revealed in NSAID-naive users (OR = 0.26; 95% CI: 0.14-0.49, p < .0001) and in the Asian population (OR = 0.30; 95% CI: 0.16-0.56, p < .001).

CONCLUSION

NSAID use is not associated with H. pylori infection in patients with PUD. PUD is more common in H. pylori positive than in negative NSAID users. Moreover, H. pylori eradication therapy reduces PUD incidence in NSAID users, especially in naive users and in the Asian population.

Lafutidine prevents low-dose aspirin and loxoprofen induced gastric injury: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo controlled study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The concomitant use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is a risk factor for low-dose aspirin (LDA)-associated upper gastrointestinal toxicity. Lafutidine is an H2-receptor antagonist with gastroprotective activity, produced by acting on capsaicin-sensitive afferent neurons. To evaluate the preventive effect of lafutidine on gastric damage caused by LDA alone and by the combination of both LDA and loxoprofen, we conducted a clinical study using healthy volunteers.

METHODS

A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover study was carried out. Sixteen healthy volunteers without Helicobacter pylori infection were randomly assigned to two groups. Both groups received 81 mg of aspirin once daily for 14 days (on days 1 to 14) and 60 mg of loxoprofen three times daily for the last 7 days (on days 8 to 14). Placebo or 10 mg of lafutidine was administered twice daily for 14 days in each group. After a 2-week washout period, placebo and lafutidine were crossed over. Endoscopic findings of gastric mucosal damage were evaluated according to the modified Lanza score.

RESULTS

The mean modified Lanza score was 2.19 ± 1.06 (SD) for aspirin plus placebo as compared with 0.50 ± 0.77 for aspirin plus lafutidine (P < 0.001), and 3.00 ± 1.56 for aspirin plus loxoprofen and placebo as compared with 1.25 ± 1.37 for aspirin plus loxoprofen and lafutidine (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of loxoprofen to LDA increases gastric mucosal damage. Standard-dose lafutidine significantly prevents gastric mucosal damage induced by LDA alone or LDA plus loxoprofen in H. pylori-negative volunteers. Larger controlled studies are needed to strengthen these findings.

Accuracy of rapid urease test in diagnosing Helicobacter pylori infection in patients using NSAIDs

BACKGROUND/AIM

This study aimed to determine the effect of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on the results of rapid urease test (RUT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study evaluated 210 consecutive patients for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. They were divided into case and control groups based on history of NSAID use (n=70 each). Two biopsy specimens were collected from antrum and corpus of stomach during endoscopy and sent for rapid urease testing and histopathology. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rate of RUT test were compared against histology.

RESULTS

The average age was 55.2+/-12.9 and 43.3+/-12.1 years in the case and control groups, respectively. Among NSAID users, RUT sensitivity, specificity and accuracy rate were all 100%. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy rate of RUT in patients without history of NSAID use were 97.37, 98.57 and 98.14%, respectively. The overall sensitivity, specificity and accuracy rate of RUT were 98.57, 99.29, and 99.04%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that sensitivity, specificity and accuracy rate of RUT are not affected by NSAID use. Rapid urease test remains a reliable test for diagnosis of H. pylori in patients on NSAIDs.

Celecoxib inhibits Helicobacter pylori colonization-related factors

AIM: To investigate the effect of celecoxib, a selective COX-2 inhibitor, on Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) colonization-related factors and its mechanism.

METHODS: After co-incubation with celecoxib, morphology of H. pylori strain 26695 was observed under a transmission electron microscope. Flagella motility was assessed by stab agar motility test. Adherence of H. pylori to AGS cells was determined by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. Levels of mRNA expression in flagellar genes (flaA, flaB), urease genes (ureA, ureB) and adhesin genes (babA, sabA, alpA, alpB, hpaA, hopZ) were measured by real-time polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS: Separation and non-integrity of bacterial cell wall, rarefaction and asymmetry of cytoplasm, and even lysis of H. pylori were observed in the presence of celecoxib. When H. pylori strains were incubated in the presence of celecoxib, their flagellar motility and adherence to AGS cells were inhibited. The expression of ureA, ureB, babA, sabA, alpA, alpB, hpaA, hopZ was up-regulated while the expression of flaA, flaB was down-regulated in the presence of celecoxib.

CONCLUSION: Celecoxib inhibits flagellar motility and adherence of H. pylori to AGS cells, and destructs their normal structure in vitro.

Gastrointestinal bleeding in percutaneous coronary intervention and acute coronary syndromes

The increasingly prevalent use of antithrombotic drug combinations and an aging population are resulting in growing rates of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB). GIB is a serious condition in the setting of stable and acute coronary syndromes, associated with high rates of ischemic events. Physicians should be aware of GIB in high-risk populations, especially the elderly and patients with anemia. We discuss the risk of GIB in patients treated with different antiplatelet and antithrombotic medications and their combinations, factors associated with GIB, and its optimal management and prevention.

Effects of aspirin on Helicobacter pylori colonization

AIM: To investigate effects of aspirin on H pylori colonization and the related mechanism.

METHODS: After co-incubation with aspirin, the morphology of H pylori was observed by transmission electron microscopy. The flagellar motility was assessed by 0.3% stab agar motility test. The adherence to AGS cells was determined using enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The mRNA expression levels of flagellar genes (flaA, flaB), urease genes (ureA, ureB) and adhesin genes (babA, sabA, alpA, alpB, hpaA, hopZ) were determined using SYBR green I real-time PCR.

RESULTS: Separation and non-integrity of cell wall, rarefaction and asymmetry of cytoplasm, and even lysis of the bacteria were the morphological effects of aspirin on H pylori. When incubated H pylori in the presence of aspirin, the ability of flagellar motility and adherence to AGS cells were inhibited. The expression of ureA, ureB, babA, sabA, alpA, alpB, hpaA, hopZ were up-regulated in the presence of aspirin, while the expression of flaA, flaB were down-regulated.

CONCLUSION: Aspirin decreases the colonization of H pylori by inhibiting flagellar motility, adherence ability and destructing normal structure of the bacteria.

Giant duodenal ulcers

Giant duodenal ulcers (GDUs) are a subset of duodenal ulcers that have historically resulted in greater morbidity than usual duodenal ulcers. Until recently, few cases had been successfully treated with medical therapy. However, the widespread use of endoscopy, the introduction of H-2 receptor blockers and proton pump inhibitors, and the improvement in surgical techniques all have revolutionized the diagnosis, treatment and outcome of this condition. Nevertheless, GDUs are still associated with high rates of morbidity, mortality and complications. Thus, surgical evaluation of a patient with a GDU should remain an integral part of patient care. These giant variants, while usually benign, can frequently harbor malignancy. A careful review of the literature highlights the important differences when comparing GDUs to classical peptic ulcers and why they must be thought of differently than their more common counterpart.

Use of NSAIDs and infection with Helicobacter pylori--what does the rheumatologist need to know?

OBJECTIVES

NSAID-induced gastroduodenal lesions are a frequent and potentially serious health problem in patients with rheumatic diseases. Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) has also been recognized as a major risk factor for the development of ulcer disease. However, the role of H. pylori in the pathogenesis of NSAID-induced gastroduodenal lesions has remained controversial, and there is currently no clear consensus on the management of NSAID users who are infected with H. pylori.

METHODS

To clarify this situation we have performed a systematic literature search to find randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of eradication in patients receiving NSAIDs to prevent ulcer development.

RESULTS

Seven randomized controlled trials and one meta-analysis were identified. There were three papers on NSAID-naive patients. According to this data, NSAID-naive users benefit from testing for H. pylori infection and subsequent H. pylori eradication therapy prior to the initiation of NSAID. In contrast, H. pylori eradication alone does not protect chronic NSAID users with recent ulcer complications from further gastrointestinal (GI) events. To prevent recurrent ulcer bleeding long-term acid suppressive therapy is needed.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, ulcer risk reduction after H. pylori eradication therapy is clearly more marked in patients beginning NSAID therapy than in patients who were already receiving and tolerating NSAID therapy. Thus, the management of H. pylori infection and the prevention of GI complications in NSAID users need to be individualized on the basis of recently published data.

Helicobacter pylori and benign upper digestive disease

Acute infection with Helicobacter pylori causes hypochlorhydria and gastrointestinal upset. As the infection persists, patients develop chronic antral-predominant or pangastritis. Gastric and duodenal ulcers arise from chronic mucosal inflammation and disordered acid secretion in the stomach. With successful eradication of H. pylori, non-NSAID-related gastric and duodenal ulcers heal even without long-term acid suppression. More importantly, peptic ulcers and their complications rarely recur. Clearing H. pylori infection also reduces the risk of mucosal injury in NSAID and aspirin users; the protective effects are more pronounced in NSAID-naïve and aspirin users. H. pylori is unlikely to be the cause of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. However, a patient's reflux symptoms may be more difficult to control after clearing the infection. Although there is little evidence to support a causal relationship between H. pylori and non-ulcer dyspepsia, treatment of the infection gives a modest improvement of symptoms.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity against Helicobacter pylori

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori infection and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are each associated with gastrointestinal mucosal damage, but the extent and direction of their interactions remain controversial. Therefore, the purpose of the present paper was to examine whether specific NSAIDs inhibit the growth of Helicobacter pylori in vitro.

METHODS

Sodium salicylate, ibuprofen, indomethacin, the selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor NS-398 and two derivatives of sulindac sulfoxide were tested against two laboratory strains of H. pylori, the mouse-adapted Sydney strain, and against seven fresh clinical isolates of Helicobacter pylori. Possible effects on Campylobacter jejuni, Staphyloccoccus aureus, Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium, and Shigella boydii were also examined.

RESULTS

Certain NSAIDs possess antibacterial activity against Helicobacter pylori at therapeutically achievable doses; an effect that appears to be independent of cyclooxygenase enzymes inhibition. For Helicobacter pylori, >90% growth inhibition and bactericidal activity were observed consistently for sulindac sulfide at < or =70 microg/mL and sulindac sulfone at < or =175 microg/mL. The minimal inhibitory concentration against Helicobacter pylori was 125 microg/mL for ibuprofen, 100 microg/mL for indomethacin and 300 microg/mL for NS-398 but much higher concentration of sodium salicylate (4000 microg/mL) and sulindac sulfoxide (> or =1250 microg/mL) were required to inhibit the growth of Helicobacter pylori.

CONCLUSIONS

The decreased prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in specimens from some NSAID users and the chemopreventive effects of NSAIDs in gastric cancer may be related to inhibition of Helicobacter pylori growth.

The association of Helicobacter pylori infection and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in peptic ulcer disease

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) affects 10% of the world population. Helicobacter pylori infection and the use of a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) are the principal factors associated with PUD. The aim of the present study was to evaluate a cohort of patients with PUD and determine the association between H pylori infection and NSAID use.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The medical charts of patients with endoscopic diagnosis of PUD were retrospectively reviewed from September 2002 to August 2003. Patients were divided into three groups according to ulcer etiology: H pylori infection (group 1); NSAID use (group 2); and combined H pylori infection and NSAID use (group 3).

RESULTS

One hundred two patients were evaluated: 36 men (35.3%) and 66 women (64.7%). Forty patients had H pylori infection, 43 had used NSAIDs and 15 had combined H pylori infection and NSAID use; four patients with ulcers secondary to malignancy were excluded. The frequency of women was significantly higher in group 2 (P=0.01). The mean age of patients in group 1 was significantly lower than in the other two groups (P=0.003). PUD developed earlier in group 3 than in group 2 (5.0+/-4.7 months versus 1.4+/-2.1 months, respectively, P=0.018). Thirty-two patients (32.7%) had bleeding peptic ulcer. Group 2 had a higher risk of bleeding peptic ulcer than the other two groups (P=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The development of PUD was observed earlier in the combined H pylori and NSAID group than in patients with only NSAID use. This suggests a synergic effect between the two risks factors in the development of PUD.

Management of co-morbidities and general medical conditions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatologists, in addition to providing subspecialty care, are frequently called to treat general medical conditions in their patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Co-morbid medical problems are common in the RA population and may require a different approach from standard practice recommendations. In this paper, we review the evaluation and treatment of cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, gastrointestinal disease, depression, and metabolic bone disease in patients with RA. Appreciation of the unique interaction between arthritis and common medical co-morbidities may have a significant impact on management and outcomes of RA.

Role of Helicobacter pylori eradication in aspirin or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug users

Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) infection and the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) including aspirin at any dosage and formulation represent well-established risk factors for the development of uncomplicated and complicated peptic ulcer disease accounting for the majority of such cases. Although the interaction between H pylori and NSAID/aspirin use in the same individuals was questioned in some epidemiological studies, it has now become widely accepted that they are at least independent risk factors for peptic ulcer disease. According to data from randomized intervention trials, naive NSAID users certainly benefit from testing for H pylori infection and, if positive, H pylori eradication therapy prior to the initiation of NSAID. A similar strategy is also suggested for naive aspirin users, although the efficacy of such an approach has not been evaluated yet. Strong data also support that chronic aspirin users with a recent ulcer complication should be tested for H pylori infection and, if positive, receive H pylori eradication therapy after ulcer healing, while they appear to benefit from additional long-term therapy with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI). A similar approach is often recommended to chronic aspirin users at a high risk of ulcer complication. H pylori eradication alone does not efficiently protect chronic NSAID users with a recent ulcer complication or those at a high-risk, who certainly should be treated with long-term PPI therapy, but H pylori eradication may be additionally offered even in this setting. In contrast, testing for H pylori or PPI therapy is not recommended for chronic NSAID/aspirin users with no ulcer complications or those at a low risk of complications.

Meta-analysis: role of Helicobacter pylori eradication in the prevention of peptic ulcer in NSAID users

AIM

To evaluate whether eradication of Helicobacter pylori prevents peptic ulcer in non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug users by means of a meta-analysis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and the AGA congress. Randomized trials comparing H. pylori eradication vs. non-eradication or eradication vs. a proton pump inhibitor in patients receiving a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug were selected.

RESULTS

Five studies and 939 patients were included in the analysis; 34 of 459 (7.4%) patients developed a peptic ulcer in the eradicated group vs. 64 of 480 (13.3%) in the control group. The odds ratio was 0.43 (95% confidence interval: 0.20-0.93). Sub-analyses showed a significant reduction of risk for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-naive (odds ratio = 0.26; 95% confidence interval: 0.14-0.49) but not for previously treated patients (odds ratio = 0.95, 95% confidence interval: 0.53-1.72). Two studies with a total of 385 patients compared eradication vs. a proton pump inhibitor; five of 196 (2.6%) developed a peptic ulcer in the eradicated group vs. zero of 189 (0%) in the proton pump inhibitor group (odds ratio = 7.43; 95% confidence interval: 1.27-43.6).

CONCLUSION

Helicobacter pylori eradication reduces the incidence of peptic ulcer in the overall population receiving non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. It appears to be especially effective when performed in non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-naïve patients. Nonetheless, eradication seems less effective than treatment with a maintenance proton pump inhibitor for preventing non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-associated ulcers.

Effect of helicobacter pylori infection on the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in users of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

PURPOSE

We evaluated whether infection with Helicobacter pylori, including specific cytotoxic-associated antigen (CagA)-positive strains, increase the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in users of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

METHODS

Cases with upper gastrointestinal bleeding and recent NSAID use, including aspirin, who were admitted during 2001, were compared with age- and sex-matched outpatient controls who had recent NSAID use. H. pylori infection was diagnosed by serum antibodies or the (13)C-urea breath test; and CagA seropositivity was diagnosed by enzyme-linked immunoassay.

RESULTS

H. pylori was detected significantly more frequently in cases of bleeding than controls (79% [63/80] vs. 56% [45/80], P = 0.004). Cases of bleeding were more likely than controls to have a history of peptic ulcer (34% [n = 27] vs. 13% [n = 10], P = 0.003), previous upper gastrointestinal bleeding (19% [n = 15] vs. 6% [n = 5], P = 0.03), recent dyspepsia (29% [n = 23] vs. 15% [n = 12], P = 0.06), and <3 months of NSAID use (58% [n = 46] vs. 40% [n = 32], P = 0.04). CagA positivity was not associated with gastrointestinal bleeding. In a multivariate analysis, H. pylori infection was the only significant risk factor for upper gastrointestinal bleeding (odds ratio = 1.7; 95% confidence interval: 1.2 to 2.5; P = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

H. pylori infection almost doubles the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding among users of NSAIDs.

Impact de l’infection à Helicobacter pylori sur le risque de complications gastro-duodénales des traitements anti-inflammatoires non stéroïdiens

The interaction of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) and non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on the development of gastro-duodenal ulcers and their complications is complex and controversial. From a clinical point of view, the question is whether or not H. pylori infection should be tested and eradicated in patients treated or about to be treated by NSAIDs or low-dose aspirin. Contradictory results have been reported in epidemiological studies. Recent data suggest that H. pylori-NSAID interaction may be different depending on the type of treatment, non aspirin NSAIDs or low-dose aspirin, the gastric or duodenal localization of ulcer and the strains of H. pylori. Controlled randomized studies suggest that eradication of H. pylori may be beneficial in NSAID-naïve patients but not in those already on long term NSAID therapy. Recommendations are proposed for different subgroups of patients. In NSAID users presenting with gastro-duodenal ulcer or complications, H. pylori screening and eradication are indicated. In patients treated or about to be treated by NSAIDs, the "test and treat" H. pylori strategy is recommended if there is a history of gastroduodenal ulcer or complications. Whether this strategy should be generalized preventively in patients without ulcer history is still controversial and deserves further studies.

Has Helicobacter pylori eradication for peptic ulcer been overrated?

Discovery of Helicobacter pylori has changed the life cycle of peptic ulcer disease (PUD). However, PUD does not completely disappear after elimination of H. pylori. Some ulcers recur even after successful eradication of H. pylori in non-users of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID). In addition, the incidence of H. pylori-negative, non-NSAID PUD (idiopathic PUD) is reported to increase with time. Moreover, H. pylori-positive ulcers are not always H. pylori-induced ulcers because there are two paradoxes of the H. pylori myth: the existence of H. pylori-positive non-recurring ulcer and recurring ulcer after cure of H. pylori infection. Taken together, H. pylori is not the only cause of peptic ulcer disease. Therefore, it is still necessary to seriously consider the pathophysiology and the management of the ulcers, which may exist after elimination of H. pylori.

Review article: should NSAID/low-dose aspirin takers be tested routinely for H. pylori infection and treated if positive? Implications for primary risk of ulcer and ulcer relapse after initial healing

Helicobacter pylori infection and the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can each result in gastric or duodenal ulcer(s) and ulcer complications. Together, H. pylori infection and NSAIDs account for approximately 90% of peptic ulcer disease. In 2003, the results of studies suggest, and guidelines recommend, the careful selection of anti-inflammatory drugs - NSAIDs or selective COX-2 inhibitors (coxibs) based upon patients gastrointestinal history and use of aspirin therapy. Testing for, and cure of, H. pylori infection is recommended in patients prior to the initiation of NSAID therapy and in those who are currently receiving NSAIDs and have a history of dyspepsia, peptic ulcer or ulcer complications. For patients who present with peptic ulcer bleeding but require NSAIDs long-term, H. pylori eradication therapy should be considered, followed by continuous proton pump inhibitor prophylaxis to prevent re-bleeding, regardless of which kind of NSAID (nonselective NSAID /coxib) is being prescribed. Routine testing for, and eradication of, H. pylori infection has not been recommended for current takers of NSAIDs with no or low risk of complications. The management of patients taking low-dose aspirin is complex, but eradication of H. pylori infection alone in those with a past history of bleeding does not guarantee complete protection and therefore a proton pump inhibitor should also be given. The success of eradication therapy should always be confirmed, because of the risk of ulcer recurrence and bleeding in H. pylori-infected patients who require anti-inflammatory treatments.

Pathogenesis and therapy of gastric and duodenal ulcer disease

Despite the decreasing frequency of Helicobacter pylori-induced peptic ulcers, peptic ulcer disease remains a major clinical problem partly because nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug ulcers have increased in frequency. The reduction in nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug ulcers by use of selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors will not eliminate the problem because of increased use of aspirin for cardiovascular prophylaxis. This article reviews current concepts of peptic ulcer pathogenesis and therapy according to ulcer etiology; discusses potential interactions between etiologies; and considers the therapy for H pylori infection including the effects of antimicrobial resistance, and the role of bismuth quadruple therapy or furazolidone salvage therapy.

Effect of Helicobacter pylori on delay in ulcer healing induced by aspirin in rats

Helicobacter pylori and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are major pathogenic factors in peptic ulcer disease but whether these two factors exert synergistic or antagonistic effects on ulcer healing has been a subject of controversy. We compared the effect of aspirin alone with that of aspirin combined with H. pylori on gastric acid secretion and healing of acetic acid gastric ulcers in rats. The H. pylori colonization of gastric mucosa was determined by viable H. pylori culture, histology and assessment of bacterial DNA using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The area of ulcers, gastric blood flow, mucosal generation of prostaglandin E(2) and plasma gastrin levels and expression of cyclooxygenase-1, cyclooxygenase-2 and growth factors was determined. Aspirin delayed significantly the healing of chronic gastric ulcers, decreased the gastric blood flow at the ulcer margin and gastric mucosal prostaglandin E(2) generation being without significant influence on gastric acid output. H. pylori acquisition that produced moderate gastric inflammation at the ulcer margin delayed significantly the healing of gastric ulcers, decreased significantly both the gastric blood flow at the ulcer margin and the gastric secretion while raising significantly the gastric mucosal prostaglandin E(2) generation and plasma gastrin levels. H. pylori infection attenuated the aspirin-induced inhibition of ulcer healing and accompanying fall in the gastric blood flow. Both aspirin and H. pylori up-regulated significantly cyclooxygenase-2 messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein but not that of cyclooxygenase-1 at the ulcer margin. Aspirin reduced significantly the transforming growth factor alpha- and vascular endothelial growth factor mRNAs, but these effects were significantly attenuated by H. pylori. We conclude that H. pylori antagonizes, in part, aspirin-induced delay of ulcer healing due to suppression of acid secretion, the enhancement in prostaglandin E(2) possibly derived from cyclooxygenase-2 and the overexpression of transforming growth factor alpha and vascular endothelial growth factor in the ulcer area.

Effect of H. pylori status on gastric ulcer healing in patients continuing nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory therapy and receiving treatment with lansoprazole or ranitidine

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this research was to determine the impact of pretreatment Helicobacter pylori infection on gastric ulcer healing rates in patients receiving nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and antisecretory medications.

METHODS

This was a pooled, prospective analysis of two identical double blind, multicenter, parallel group studies. Six hundred ninety-two patients receiving NSAIDs and with endoscopy-documented gastric ulcers were enrolled from 90 North American sites in primary care and referral centers. Patients were randomized to receive ranitidine (150 mg b.i.d.) or lansoprazole (15 mg or 30 mg once daily) for 8 wk. Ulcer healing was assessed by endoscopy at 4 and 8 wk in an intent-to-treat population. H. pylori status was determined at baseline by histology.

RESULTS

Across all three treatment groups, gastric ulcers were more likely to heal and heal faster if the individual was infected with H. pylori. Healing rates at 8 wk were statistically significantly greater among H. pylori positive patients (n = 181) than among negative patients (n = 497) (70% vs 61%, respectively; p < 0.05), especially among those with large ulcers (> 10 mm) and in younger patients (< 60 yr old). Simple healing rates (regardless of H. pylori status) were significantly better in the 15- and 30-mg lansoprazole groups than in the ranitidine group after 4 wk (46%, 54%, and 32%, respectively; p < or = 0.01) and 8 wk (66%, 74%, and 50%, respectively; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients receiving NSAIDs, gastric ulcer healing with an antisecretory agent is significantly enhanced in the presence of H. pylori infection.

Inhibition of Helicobacter pylori-induced cyclo-oxygenase-2 aggravates NSAID-caused gastric damage in Mongolian gerbils

BACKGROUND

The effect of Helicobacter pylori infection on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced gastric mucosal injury is controversial.

AIM

To examine the effect of the interaction between H. pylori and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on gastric mucosal injury.

METHODS

Mongolian gerbils infected with H. pylori were treated with indometacin at 8 mg/kg for 2 days or 7 days. Mucosal damage was assessed by macroscopic and histological examination, and myeloperoxidase activity was measured as an index of neutrophil infiltration. The expression levels of cyclo-oxygenase proteins were determined by Western blot analysis and cyclo-oxygenase activity.

RESULTS

A 2-day course of indometacin did not cause an increase in gastric damage in H. pylori-infected Mongolian gerbils compared to uninfected gerbils, while a 7-day course of indometacin caused additive gastric damage in H. pylori-infected animals. H. pylori infection induced cyclo-oxygenase-2 expression in the stomach. Treatment with indometacin for 2 days did not significantly affect cyclo-oxygenase activity in H. pylori-infected animals, while treatment for 7 days inhibited both cyclo-oxygenase-1 and cyclo-oxygenase-2 activities. Pre-treatment with a selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitor aggravated mucosal injury in H. pylori-infected animals treated or not treated with indometacin for 2 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that cyclo-oxygenase-2 protein induced by H. pylori infection may be involved in the defence of the gastric mucosa against damage caused by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Therefore, inhibition of cyclo-oxygenase-2 activity may enhance non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-caused gastric damage in H. pylori-infected animals.

Review article: the effect of Helicobacter pylori infection on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced upper gastrointestinal tract injury

Helicobacter pylori and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the two major causes of peptic ulcers. This article reviews the interaction of H. pylori and NSAIDs on the development of gastric mucosal histological changes, endoscopically confirmed ulcers, and ulcer complications, and assesses whether underlying H. pylori infection potentiates (or mitigates) the development of NSAID-induced ulcer disease. The weight of evidence does not suggest that H. pylori infection potentiates the risk of ulcer formation or ulcer complications in NSAID users. If such an effect occurs, it is likely to be relatively small. Some data even suggest that H. pylori may be protective against NSAID-induced gastric ulcers. Limited data raise the possibility that H. pylori infection, however, may potentiate the effect of low-dose aspirin with respect to ulcer bleeding. Both NSAIDs and H. pylori are independent risk factors for ulcer disease. Therefore, in an individual patient with an ulcer, one cannot be certain which factor is responsible for the ulcer, and both risks should be removed if possible.

Role of Helicobacter pylori infection and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in peptic-ulcer disease: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The relation between H pylori infection and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the pathogenesis of peptic-ulcer disease is controversial. We undertook a meta-analysis to address this issue.

METHODS

By computer and manually we sought observational studies on the prevalence of peptic-ulcer disease in adult NSAID takers or the prevalence of H pylori infection and NSAID use in patients with peptic-ulcer bleeding. Summary odds ratios were calculated from the raw data. Tests for homogeneity were done.

FINDINGS

Of 463 citations identified, 25 studies met inclusion criteria. In 16 studies of 1625 NSAID takers, uncomplicated peptic-ulcer disease was significantly more common in patients positive than in those negative for H pylori (341/817 [41.7%] vs 209/808 [25.9%]; odds ratio 2.12 [95% CI 1.68-2.67]). In five controlled studies, peptic-ulcer disease was significantly more common in NSAID takers (138/385 [35.8%]) than in controls (23/276 [8.3%]), irrespective of H pylori infection. Compared with H pylori negative individuals not taking NSAIDs, the risk of ulcer in H pylori infected NSAID takers was 61.1 (9.98-373). H pylori infection increased the risk of peptic-ulcer disease in NSAID takers 3.53-fold in addition to the risk associated with NSAID use (odds ratio 19.4). Similarly, in the presence of risk of peptic-ulcer disease associated with H pylori infection (18.1), use of NSAIDs increased the risk of peptic-ulcer disease 3.55-fold. H pylori infection and NSAID use increased the risk of ulcer bleeding 1.79-fold and 4.85-fold, respectively. However, the risk of ulcer bleeding increased to 6.13 when both factors were present.

INTERPRETATION

Both H pylori infection and NSAID use independently and significantly increase the risk of peptic ulcer and ulcer bleeding. There is synergism for the development of peptic ulcer and ulcer bleeding between H pylori infection and NSAID use. Peptic-ulcer disease is rare in H pylori negative non-NSAID takers.

Helicobacter pylori and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

The complex interaction between H. pylori and NSAIDs implies that it is over simplistic to conclude that their relationship is independent, synergistic, or antagonistic without considering the influence of other factors. Factors such as previous exposure to NSAIDs, a history of ulcer complication, concurrent use of acid-suppressant therapy, and the difference between NSAIDs and low-dose aspirin all affect the outcome. Several recommendations can be made with regard to the indications of H. pylori eradication for patients requiring NSAIDs. First, patients taking NSAIDs who have ulcers or previous ulcer disease should be tested for the bacterium, and it should be eradicated if present because it is impossible to determine whether the ulcers are caused by H. pylori or NSAIDs or both. Antiulcer drugs should be prescribed to prevent ulcer recurrence for patients who continue to require NSAIDs. Although the efficacy of omeprazole is enhanced by H. pylori infection, it is not justified to leave a pathogen in the stomach in exchange for a modest therapeutic gain. Second, for patients who take low-dose aspirin, eradication of H. pylori substantially reduces the risk of ulcer bleeding. It is advisable that patients taking low-dose aspirin who are at risk of ulcer bleeding should be tested for H. pylori and treated for it if the infection is found. Third, for patients who are about to start NSAIDs, screen-and-treat H. pylori has the potential of reducing the ulcer risk at an affordable incremental cost. It might be argued that any interaction between H. pylori and NSAIDs would become irrelevant in the era of COX-2-selective NSAIDs. Even among patients who are receiving a COX-2-selective NSAID, however, a large-scale study showed that the ulcer risk is significantly higher in H. pylori-positive patients than in uninfected patients. This finding suggests that the relative importance of H. pylori in ulcer development might increase with a reduced toxicity of COX-2-selective NSAIDs. With an increasing use of low-dose aspirin for cardiovascular prophylaxis, the problem of aspirin-related ulcer disease is expected to rise. Given the significant role of H. pylori in the latter condition, screen-and-treat H. pylori might be a useful strategy for the prevention of ulcer complications in high-risk patients receiving low-dose aspirin in the future.

Helicobacter pylori infection and the use of NSAIDs

Helicobacter pylori infection and the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can each result in gastroduodenal ulcers and ulcer complications. Recent studies have suggested that there is an interaction between the two causes such that elimination of H. pylori before NSAID treatment decreases the occurrence of ulcers. This led to the conclusion of the Maastricht 2000 meeting that H. pylori eradication should be considered before embarking on long-term NSAID therapy. One of the main sources of confusion is related to the fact that prospective endoscopic studies testing various drugs for prevention of NSAID ulcers among chronic NSAID users are probably not directly applicable to problems of clinical ulcers and of ulcer complications. It has become clear that, to be interpretable clinically, such studies must provide separate analyses based on H. pylori status, history of ulcer, or an ulcer complication. Overall, the data strongly support the notion that eradication therapy is beneficial for primary prophylaxis. In contrast, one would expect little benefit when NSAIDs caused the clinical ulcer (secondary prevention) and, at best, H. pylori eradication has a modest effect on the prevention of recurrent ulcer bleeding in NSAID users who have suffered ulcer complications. The data support the notion that H. pylori eradication therapy should be given to all H. pylori -infected patients with peptic ulcers irrespective of whether or not they have used NSAIDs. Proton pump inhibitors are superior to placebo for the prevention of ulcer recurrence but are inferior to full-dose misoprostol for the prevention of ulcers among those with NSAID ulcers and no H. pylori infection. Selective COX-2 inhibitors appear to reduce markedly, but not eliminate, ulcer complications among chronic NSAID users.

Prevention and treatment of gastrointestinal symptoms and complications due to NSAIDs

The mechanisms by which aspirin(ASA) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) cause gastrointestinal symptoms are poorly understood. They probably arise from several causes, including direct and indirect mucosal injury, exacerbation of underlying peptic ulcer disease or non-ulcer dyspepsia, exacerbation of Helicobacter pylori gastritis, and possibly motility disorders. No single form of therapy has been generally successful. Because, in most cases, symptoms abate fairly rapidly with continued treatment, there is little evidence that benefit associated with any symptom-directed drug therapy is superior to placebo beyond 4 weeks. Exceptions may be the subsets of patients with pre-existing ulcer disease or heartburn, exacerbated by the NSAID therapy, who usually benefit from acid-suppressive drug treatment. Different NSAIDs vary in the frequency with which their use leads to gastrointestinal(GI) complications such as haemorrhage, perforation, obstruction, or the symptomatic ulcers from which about 40% of the complications arise. Most gastroduodenal ulcers heal over time, albeit more slowly, with conventional doses of any of the available anti-ulcer drugs. Maintenance therapy may be needed in many patients who continue NSAID therapy. Anti-ulcer drugs have not, thus far, been shown to be more effective than placebo in preventing ulcer complications or their recurrence. The use of COX-2-selective inhibitors appears, in outcome studies, to reduce gastrointestinal bleeding, including bleeding from ulcers, but it is not established that the ulcers protected were caused by NSAIDs, as distinct from ulcers exacerbating or recurring from antecedent peptic ulcer disease. To-date, perforation or obstruction have not been shown to be affected by selective COX-2 inhibitor drugs. If the major problem giving rise to severe NSAID complications is pre-existing peptic ulcer disease, it may yet emerge that the most effective approach will be the use of proton pump inhibitor drugs, for the duration of NSAID therapy, in a small subset of high-risk patients. Most other low-risk patients may not need any special care. Co-morbid conditions have a major impact on outcome of NSAID therapy. Morbidity or even death attributable solely to NSAIDs is probably small in normal patients, and requires little in the way of prophylaxis.

Risk factors of oesophagitis in arthritic patients

BACKGROUND

The risk factors that precipitate the occurrence of oesophageal mucosal injury in patients on continuous nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) therapy are unknown.

METHODS

Outpatients who regularly consumed NSAIDs for osteoarthritis were recruited from a rheumatology clinic into a prospective case-control study. All patients answered a structured interview and underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

RESULTS

Of 450 eligible patients, 195 (43%) consented to be interviewed and undergo upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Oesophagitis was diagnosed in 41 of these 195 patients (21%). The occurrence of gastric or duodenal ulcer in individual patients did not predict the concomitant damage of the oesophageal mucosa. Young age (odds ratio: 1.79 per decade of life; 95% confidence interval: 1.11-2.86) and hiatus hernia (odds ratio: 3.72; 95% confidence interval: 1.63-8.49) both increased the risk of developing oesophagitis. When questioned, all oesophagitis patients revealed at least one gastrointestinal symptom, heartburn being named most frequently (odds ratio: 4.78; 95% confidence interval: 2.04-11.17). The type of anti-inflammatory medication, the use of alcohol and the use of nicotine were not associated with any significant risk for erosive oesophagitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients on chronic NSAID therapy for rheumatological disease suffer frequently from erosive oesophagitis. While the risk may be higher in patients with a pre-existing tendency for gastro-oesophageal reflux, any concomitant history of NSAID-induced peptic ulcer disease does not add to the risk. Erosive oesophagitis should be considered especially in patients on NSAIDs who complain of heartburn.

Review article: Helicobacter pylori and NSAID gastropathy

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and Helicobacter pylori are known to share a number of pathogenic mechanisms, but there is no evidence to show a significant synergic action between the two risk factors. Studies assessing this subject have differed in almost every aspect of their methodology, including the definition of a NSAID user as well as the types, doses, duration and their indications for NSAID use. They also differed in their end-points, the definition of dyspepsia and the regimes used for eradication of H. pylori. However, some conclusions may be drawn from the results of clinical trials. In H. pylori-positive patients without mucosal lesions, NSAIDs may aggravate dyspeptic symptoms but, with the exception of elderly patients, they do not present a definite major risk of gastric and duodenal lesions and, above all, of ulcer-correlated complications. So what recommendations can be made with regard to H. pylori eradication in patients requiring treatment with NSAIDs? The microorganism and the anti-inflammatory drugs are undoubtedly independent causes of gastric and duodenal damage. Patients taking NSAIDs who are found to have gastric or duodenal ulcers should therefore be tested for the bacterium and specifically treated, since H. pylori and NSAID-induced ulcers may be macroscopically indistinguishable. Whether asymptomatic patients taking NSAIDs should be tested and treated for H. pylori infection is still a matter of debate.

The effect of helicobacter pylori eradication on NSAID-induced gastrointestinal toxicity

OBJECTIVE

To review the data to determine whether Helicobacter pylori eradication alters nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced gastrointestinal toxicity.

DATA SOURCE

Literature accessed through MEDLINE from 1966 to May2000 and abstracts of recently presented data at scientific meetings.

DATA SYNTHESIS

NSAID use and H. pylon infection are independent risk factors for the development of gastrointestinal ulcers. An evaluation of the relationship between these two risk factors and the impact of H. pylori eradication on NSAID-induced gastrointestinal toxicity was conducted.

CONCLUSIONS

H. pylori colonization and NSAID use are independent risk factors for the development of gastrointestinal ulcers. The data regarding the interaction between these two risk factors in the development of gastrointestinal ulcers are conflicting. Eradication of H. pylori does not appear to decrease the risk of NSAID-induced gastrointestinal toxicity in the majority of patients. As there is little evidence to support a clear benefit of eradicating H. pylori in patients requiring NSAID therapy, routine screening for and eradication of H. pylori in these patients is not recommended.

Helicobacter pylori infection--current treatment practice

Helicobacter pylori infection, which is present in 30 - 60% of the population in developed countries and in more than 60% in developing countries, is established to be a major cause of gastritis, peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer. Eradication therapy has been incorporated into clinical practice over the past 15 years. Treatment regimens include a 2 week bismuth-based triple therapy (a bismuth compound plus metronidazole, tetracycline or amoxycillin), a 1 week proton-pump inhibitor (PPI)-based triple therapy and a 1 week ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC)-based triple therapy (a PPI or RBC plus any two of the three antibiotics, metronidazole, amoxycillin and clarithromycin). These regimens achieve eradication rates of >> 80%. H. pylori resistance to metronidazole and clarithromycin decreases the clinical efficacy of most regimens, despite the high eradication rates for resistant strains achieved by the RBC-triple therapy in some recent trials. The dose of antibiotics (especially clarithromycin) and the duration of treatment may also influence the eradication rate. Doctors' beliefs impact on clinical practice and, thus, influence the clinical application of eradication therapy. Whereas peptic ulcer disease and primary gastric low-grade B-cell mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma (MALToma) have become established as definite indications for eradication therapy, there remain controversies surrounding non-ulcer dyspepsia, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, atrophic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia, use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and H. pylori-related extradigestive diseases.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug gastropathy and Helicobacter pylori: the search for an improbable consensus

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and Helicobacter pylori are known to share a number of pathogenic mechanisms, but there is no evidence to show a significant synergistic action between these two risk factors. Studies to assess possible interactions in the pathogenesis of dyspepsia and upper gastrointestinal mucosal lesions have differed in their endpoints, the definition of dyspepsia, and the regimens used for eradication of H. pylori. However, some conclusions may be drawn from the results of clinical trials. As far as dyspepsia is concerned, an association between NSAID dyspepsia and infection with H. pylori, seems likely, but it is difficult to make sense of the discrepant data that are currently available. On the contrary, neither short- nor long-term NSAID administration presents a definite major risk of gastric and duodenal injury or, above all, of ulcer-related complications (bleeding or perforation) in H. pylori-positive patients. Based on these considerations, what recommendations can be made with regard to H. pylori eradication in patients requiring treatment with NSAIDs? H. pylori and anti-inflammatory drugs are probably independent causes of gastric and duodenal damage. Patients taking NSAIDs who are found to have gastric or duodenal ulcers should, therefore, be tested for the bacterium and specifically treated, because H. pylori and NSAID-induced ulcers may be macroscopically indistinguishable. Whether asymptomatic patients taking NSAIDs should be tested and treated for H. pylori infection is still a matter of debate.

The nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs controversy

The relationship between NSAIDs and H. pylori as risk factors for the development of peptic ulcer is complex and controversial. In the case of duodenal ulcers in NSAID users, there now is enough information to suggest that eradication of H. pylori usually is worthwhile. In the stomach, however, there is some evidence that ulcers heal faster and are no more likely to reappear if the infection is left alone, provided that patients continue to take an NSAID. Why this situation should be so is unclear. Possibilities include greater efficacy of antisecretory agents, a smaller inhibition of prostaglandin production, and a blunted apoptotic response in patients who are infected with H. pylori and take NSAIDs.

Accurate diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori. Serologic testing

Serologic testing is a useful noninvasive testing strategy for H. pylori. It is particularly useful in areas where the prevalence of H. pylori is high and inexpensive point-of-contact fingerprick tests are used. Sensitive tests are valuable ways of excluding H. pylori infection and can be used in conjunction with a direct test (urease histology culture or breath test) to confirm absence of H. pylori if the two methods are concordant. Serologic testing is more definitive and differentiating if the antigenic epitopes of H. pylori can be differentiated based on the antigenic epitopes that specifically associate with gastric cancer, peptic ulcer, and nonulcer dyspepsia. A study by Kawahara's group reported that Hsp 60 may be involved in the development of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue based on ELISA. The idea of differentiating antigens for H. pylori may open a new area for use of serologic testing in the diagnostic approach of H. pylori infections.

Helicobacter pylori and dyspepsia: a population-based study of the organism and host

OBJECTIVE

The role of Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection in dyspepsia in the absence of peptic ulcer remains controversial. Specific attributes of the organism or the host response may be important. We aimed to determine whether HP infection overall, CagA status, serum gastrin, or serum pepsinogen levels are associated with dyspepsia in the community.

METHODS

A self-report bowel disease questionnaire was mailed to a random sample of Olmsted County, Minnesota residents, aged 20-50 yr. All respondents who reported symptoms of dyspepsia or irritable bowel syndrome (cases) and all respondents without significant GI symptoms (controls) were invited to participate (n = 260). They were each assessed by a physician and their medical records reviewed. Serum was obtained to measure HP and CagA antibodies, pepsinogen I and II levels, and basal serum gastrin using validated assays.

RESULTS

Of the 148 (57%) subjects who agreed to participate, 36 had dyspepsia (17 had ulcer-like dyspepsia), 35 had irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) without dyspepsia, and 77 were asymptomatic. The proportion who were seropositive for HP were 17% in dyspepsia (24% in ulcer-like dyspepsia), 20% in IBS, and 12% in asymptomatic controls. HP was not associated with dyspepsia, ulcer-like dyspepsia, or IBS after adjusting for age. Pepsinogen levels and serum gastrin were not associated with any of the conditions studied. However, CagA antibody positivity was associated with IBS (p < 0.05), and a borderline statistically significant association with dyspepsia was detected (p = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

In this community, HP infection overall does not seem to explain dyspepsia, although the role of CagA-positive HP strains deserve further study.

Efficacy of pantoprazole in the prevention of peptic ulcers, induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a prospective, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of pantoprazole in preventing gastrointestinal lesions in patients with rheumatic diseases receiving continuous, long-term treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

MATERIAL

This was a prospective, randomised, double-blind, unbalanced, placebo-controlled, parallel group study. Outpatients (n= 104, age range 22-80 years, mean age 59.5) with rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis, requiring chronic intake of NSAIDs (at least 8 weeks prior to the start of the study), were randomised and enrolled to receive either 40 mg pantoprazole (n=70) or placebo (n=34) once daily, for 12 weeks. Patients had endoscopically confirmed gastric and duodenal lesions grade 0, 1 or 2 (Lanza classification grade 0: normal to hyperaemic mucosa; grade 1: 1 to 3 erosions, submucosal haemorrhage or petechiae, grade 2: 4 to 10 erosions, submucosal haemorrhages or petechiae). Clinical and endoscopic evaluations were performed at baseline, after 4, and 12 weeks. The primary end-point of the study was the incidence of gastric or duodenal ulcers after 4 and 12 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS

Patients (n=95) were evaluated: 65 in the pantoprazole group and 30 in the placebo group. When considering all patients (those with Lanza score grade 0, 1, 2 at baseline), the overall proportion of patients in remission was 82% and 77% after 4 weeks, and 72% and 59% after 12 weeks in pantoprazole and placebo groups, respectively (cumulative survival analysis according to Kaplan-Meier). The difference between the treatment groups was even more marked when only those patients with normal mucosa at baseline (grade 0) were considered. After 12 weeks, the proportion of patients in remission was 82% (95% confidence limits 70% - 94% in the pantoprazole and 55% (95% confidence limits 33% - 77%) in the placebo treatment group, p=O.036. Adverse events were reported in 4% and 6% of patients in pantoprazole and placebo treatment groups, respectively

CONCLUSIONS

Pantoprazole 40 mg once daily was well tolerated and is more effective than placebo in the prevention of peptic ulcers in patients with rheumatic diseases who require continuous, long-term, treatment with NSAIDs.

How does Helicobacter pylori infection interact with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs?

There have been conflicting clinical data on whether Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) contributes to the pathogenesis of ulcers induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The discrepant findings reflect the complex interaction between H. pylori and NSAIDs, which has generated divergent results under different clinical conditions. This chapter reviews the pathogenetic mechanisms in ulcer formation that are common to H. pylori and NSAIDs, and explains how a better understanding of these factors might resolve some of the controversies. Existing evidence indicates that the interaction between H. pylori and NSAIDs is not an 'all-or-none' relationship. Factors such as previous exposure to NSAIDs, a past history of ulcer complication, gastric acid output, neutrophil infiltration, concurrent acid suppressive therapy and the type of NSAID used (aspirin versus non-aspirin NSAIDs) would influence the role of H. pylori as a risk factor in NSAID users. Recommendations on H. pylori eradication for different subgroups of NSAID users are proposed.

The quality of care for Medicare patients with peptic ulcer disease

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine quality of care for hospitalized Medicare beneficiaries with peptic ulcer disease.

METHODS

Collaborating with five Peer Review Organizations, we used 1995 Medicare claim files to select samples of inpatients with a principal diagnosis of peptic ulcer disease. Quality of care indicators developed by content experts included percentages for ulcer patients tested for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori); biopsied patients who received tissue tests; H. pylori-positive patients who received appropriate therapy; and ulcer patients screened for preadmission nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use and counseled about risks.

RESULTS

Of 2,644 patients eligible for medical record review, 56% were tested for H. pylori, and 73% of those testing positive were treated appropriately; 84% of patients with endoscopic biopsies received a tissue test for H. pylori; 74% of patients were screened for preadmission NSAID use, 24% had documented counseling of NSAID use, and only 2% had documented counseling on the ulcer risk of NSAID use. Statistically significant regional variation occurred in four of six quality indicators. Outpatient records were reviewed for 529 patients to document prior outpatient H. pylori in this population; only 2% (n = 12) were tested for H. pylori in the year before admission.

CONCLUSIONS

Opportunities exist to improve quality of care by testing for and treating H. pylori in hospitalized Medicare beneficiaries with peptic ulcer disease and to improve screening for NSAIDs and counseling on ulcer risks.

Dyspepsia and heartburn

Dyspepsia and heartburn are the two cardinal symptoms of foregut dysfunction. When confronting such a problem, that physician must first learn to discern between the two, because treatment can be quite different for the conditions presenting with these symptoms. This article details the approach to work-up and treatment of patients presenting with dyspepsia or heartburn.

Gastrointestinal effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory therapy

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely prescribed for the treatment of many conditions including rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, gouty arthritis, the joint and muscle discomfort associated with systemic lupus erythematosus, and other musculoskeletal disorders. Yet, their benefits, which are believed to be a result of their ability to inhibit cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), are accompanied by considerable toxicity. NSAIDs' untoward effects are attributed to their inhibition of the constitutively expressed enzyme cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1), with attendant suppression of the synthesis of prostanoids, substances that mediate key homeostatic functions. Side effects include suppression of hemostasis through inhibition of platelet aggregation, adverse effects in patients with heart failure and cirrhosis, and those with certain renal diseases, as well as complicating antihypertensive therapies involving diuretics or beta-adrenoceptor blockade. Perhaps most importantly, NSAIDs disrupt the gastrointestinal mucosal-protective and acid-limiting properties of prostaglandins, frequently leading to upper gastrointestinal erosions and ulceration, with possible subsequent hemorrhage and perforation. These complications can be reduced through identification of patients at risk, with circumspect use of NSAIDs, careful functional monitoring, and, in the case of gastrointestinal toxicity, co-administration of such agents as misoprostol or omeprazole. However, these strategies introduce complexity into the treatment paradigm. Moreover, side effects and adverse events may be significantly reduced through the use of COX-2-specific inhibitors, new agents that alleviate pain and inflammation without the liability for adverse events caused by COX-1 inhibition.

The relation between Helicobacter pylori and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Both infection with Helicobacter pylori and use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can result in gastritis and ulcers. H. pylori has been identified as a major etiologic factor in the development of peptic ulcer disease; however, its relationship to NSAID-associated toxicity is less well characterized. Several studies have suggested that NSAID use does not increase susceptibility to H. pylori, and the converse has also been suggested, namely, that H. pylori does not exacerbate NSAID-associated injury. H. pylori itself may stimulate production of gastric prostaglandins, which may have a role in ulcer healing. More carefully controlled studies may be better able to elucidate the individual and synergistic mechanisms involved in ulceration induced by H. pylori and NSAIDs. Recent studies have suggested that elimination of H. pylori before NSAID treatment decreases ulcer occurrence. Therefore, at this time, eradication of H. pylori should be considered only in certain high-risk patients, i.e., those with a history of gastroduodenal ulcers.

Omeprazole 20 or 40 mg daily for healing gastroduodenal ulcers in patients receiving non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

BACKGROUND

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are strongly associated with gastroduodenal ulcers, and the management of patients with NSAID-associated ulcers represents a common clinical dilemma.

AIM

To assess NSAID-associated ulcer healing during treatment with either standard (20 mg) or high dosage (40 mg) omeprazole.

METHODS

One hundred and sixty-nine patients chronically ingesting diclofenac, ketoprofen, indomethacin or naproxen for osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis, who had abdominal pain and an endoscopically proven gastroduodenal ulcer, were evaluated in a randomized, double-blind, dose regimen trial with omeprazole 20 mg o.m. (n = 81) or omeprazole 40 mg o.m. (n = 88). Ulcer healing was assessed endoscopically at 4 and 8 weeks in the case of unhealed ulcers. Patients continued their usual daily dose of anti-inflammatory medication throughout the study period.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty-six patients completed the study (77 patients taking 20 mg omeprazole and 79 patients taking 40 mg omeprazole); 12 patients were lost during follow-up and one patient reported an adverse event. Cumulative ulcer intention-to-treat healing rates at 8 weeks were 88% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 79-95%) for the 20 mg omeprazole group and 96.2% (95% CI = 89-99%) for the 40 mg group, and 97.1% (95% CI = 90-100%) for the 20 mg omeprazole group and 98.6% (95% CI = 93-100%) for the 40 mg group by per protocol analysis. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups. Symptom relief did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

Both standard and high doses of omeprazole are equally safe and effective regimens for the treatment of NSAID-induced gastroduodenal ulcers when anti-inflammatory treatment is not discontinued.