Assay restriction profiles of three monoclonal antibodies recognizing the G3m(u) allotype. Development of an allotype specific assay

Design, Production, Characterization, and Use of Peptide Antibodies

Antibodies are key reagents in diagnostics, therapeutics, and experimental biology, capable of detecting numerous targets [...].

Can anti-bothropstoxin-I antibodies discriminate between Bothrops jararaca and Bothrops jararacussu venoms?

Background

Snakes of the genus Bothrops, popularly known as pit vipers, are responsible for most cases of snakebite in Brazil. Within this genus, Bothrops jararacussu and B. jararaca deserve special attention due to the severity of their bites and for inhabiting densely populated areas. Regarding the treatment of snakebites by Bothrops jararacussu, questions have been raised about the effectiveness of the specific bothropic antivenom in neutralizing myotoxic effects; however, there are no accurate data for humans. Thus, the development of a differential diagnostic kit for this species would be of great interest because it provides, for healthcare professionals, a tool that would allow us to determine whether the accident was caused by B. jararacussu or other species of the genus. It would also make it possible to evaluate the specificity of the treatment and to provide data for epidemiological studies.

Methods

First, we produced a species-specific polyclonal antibody – a potential biomarker of Bothrops jararacussu venom – against bothropstoxin-I (BthTx-I), which is also found in smaller quantities in the venoms of B. jararaca from southern Brazil.

Results

Polyclonal antibodies against bothropstoxin-I could be separated into several species-specific immunoglobulins. Then, aiming to develop a system of safe and standardized immunoassay, we produced monoclonal antibodies. Seven hybridomas were obtained. Five of them were specific to the venom of B. jararacussu and two recognized the venom of B. jararaca from the southeastern population. The use of monoclonal antibodies also made it possible to differentiate B. jararacussu from B. jararaca venom obtained from the southern population. Analyzing the reactivity of monoclonal antibodies against other bothropic venoms, we found mAb Bt-3 to be more specific than others for B. jararacussu venom.

Conclusions

These results show the potential of BthTx-I for producing monoclonal antibodies that differentiate between B. jararacussu and other Bothrops species venoms.

Peptide Antibodies in Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics

Peptide antibodies, with their high specificities and affinities, are invaluable reagents for peptide and protein recognition in biological specimens. Depending on the application and the assay, in which the peptide antibody is to used, several factors influence successful antibody production, including peptide selection and antibody screening. Peptide antibodies have been used in clinical laboratory diagnostics with great success for decades, primarily because they can be produced to multiple targets, recognizing native wildtype proteins, denatured proteins, and newly generated epitopes. Especially mutation-specific peptide antibodies have become important as diagnostic tools in the detection of various cancers. In addition to their use as diagnostic tools in malignant and premalignant conditions, peptide antibodies are applied in all other areas of clinical laboratory diagnostics, including endocrinology, hematology, neurodegenerative diseases, cardiovascular diseases, infectious diseases, and amyloidoses.

Production and Screening of Monoclonal Peptide Antibodies

Hybridoma technology is a remarkable and indispensable tool for generating high-quality monoclonal antibodies. Hybridoma-derived monoclonal antibodies not only serve as powerful research and diagnostic reagents, but have also emerged as the most rapidly expanding class of therapeutic biologicals. In this chapter, an overview of hybridoma technology and the laboratory procedures used routinely for hybridoma production and antibody screening are presented, including characterization of peptide antibodies.

When tissue antigens and antibodies get along: revisiting the technical aspects of immunohistochemistry--the red, brown, and blue technique

Once focused mainly on the characterization of neoplasms, immunohistochemistry (IHC) today is used in the investigation of a broad range of disease processes with applications in diagnosis, prognostication, therapeutic decisions to tailor treatment to an individual patient, and investigations into the pathogenesis of disease. This review addresses the technical aspects of immunohistochemistry (and, to a lesser extent, immunocytochemistry) with attention to the antigen-antibody reaction, optimal fixation techniques, tissue processing considerations, antigen retrieval methods, detection systems, selection and use of an autostainer, standardization and validation of IHC tests, preparation of proper tissue and reagent controls, tissue microarrays and other high-throughput systems, quality assurance/quality control measures, interpretation of the IHC reaction, and reporting of results. It is now more important than ever, with these sophisticated applications, to standardize the entire IHC process from tissue collection through interpretation and reporting to minimize variability among laboratories and to facilitate quantification and interlaboratory comparison of IHC results.

Development of two murine monoclonal antibodies recognizing human nG1m(a)-like isoallotypic markers

Antigenic determinants of immunoglobulin molecules are categorized into three groups: idiotypes, isotypes, and allotypes. An isoallotype is defined as an isotypic determinant in one or more subclasses and an allotype in another subclass of a given isotype. The isoallotype nG1m(a), formerly called non-a, is an allotype located on human IgG1 molecules lacking the G1m(a) allotype. This marker, however, is also detectable on all human IgG2 and IgG3 molecules. Anti-isoallotypic antibodies are useful tools for structural studies of immunoglobulins, forensic science, and epidemiological demographic investigations. In this study, two murine monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) recognizing nG1m(a)-like epitope(s) were generated against a human IgG myeloma protein. These MAbs are produced by hybridoma clones (4F18B12 and 6F18D1) obtained by fusion of SP2/0 myeloma cells with splenocytes from BALB/c mice immunized with heavy chain of a human IgG3 myeloma protein. These MAbs reacted with Fc, but not Fab fragment of the immunizing IgG3 paraprotein. Specificity of the MAbs was further analyzed using a panel of purified myeloma proteins and polyclonal IgG3, including IgG1 (n = 9), IgG2 (n = 4), IgG3 (n = 8), and IgG4 (n = 6) subclasses. Our results demonstrated that these MAbs reacted with linear epitope(s) located on heavy chain of all IgG2 and IgG3 molecules tested and some paraproteins of IgG1 subclass, but none of the IgG4 molecules. So these MAbs seem to recognize nG1m(a)-like isoallotypic marker. These MAbs showed no cross-reactivity with serum of other species tested. Both MAbs belonged to IgG1 subclass with affinity constants of 4.5 x 10(9) mol(-1) (4F18B12) and 3.46 x 10(9) mol(-1) (6F18D1), respectively. These MAbs might be used as a tool to detect nG1m(a) + IgG molecules.

Technical aspects of immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemistry is an integral technique in many veterinary laboratories for diagnostic and research purposes. In the last decade, the ability to detect antigens (Ags) in tissue sections has improved dramatically, mainly by countering the deleterious effects of formaldehyde with antigen retrieval (AR) and increasing sensitivity of the detection systems. In this review, I address these topics and provide an overview of technical aspects of immunohistochemistry, including those related to antibodies (Abs) and Ags, fixation, AR, detection methods, background, and troubleshooting. Microarray technology and the use of rabbit monoclonal Abs in immunohistochemistry are also discussed.

Characterisation of epitopes of pan-IgG/anti-G3m(u) and anti-Fc monoclonal antibodies

The characterisation of monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) and their epitopes is important prior to their application as molecular probes. In this study, Western blotting using IgG1 Fc and pFc' fragments was employed to screen seven MAbs before pepscan analysis to determine their reactivity to potentially linear epitopes. MAbs PNF69C, PNF110A, X1A11 and MAbs WC2, G7C, JD312, 1A1 detected epitopes within the C(H)3 and C(H)2 domains, respectively. However, only four MAbs showed pepscan profiles that highlighted likely target residues. In particular, MAbs PNF69C and PNF110A that have previously been characterised with pan-IgG and anti-G3m(u) specificity, detected the peptide motif 338-KAKGQPR-344 which was located within the N-terminal region of the C(H)3 domain. Furthermore the majority of residues were present in all four IgG subclasses. Consequently the peptide identified was consistent with the pan-IgG nature of these antibodies. By using PCImdad, a molecular display programme, this sequence was visualised as surface accessible, located in the C(H)2/C(H)3 inter-domain region and proximal to the residue arginine(435). It is speculated that this residue may be important for phenotypic expression of G3m(u) and specificity of these reagents. Pepscan analysis of MAbs G7C and JD312 (both pan-IgG) highlighted the core peptide sequence 290-KPREE-294, which was present in the C(H)2 domain and was common to all four IgG subclasses. PCImdad also showed this region to be highly accessible and was consistent with previous bioinformatic and autoimmune analysis of IgG. Overall these MAbs may serve as useful anti-IgG or anti-G3m(u) reagents and probes of immunoglobulin structure.

Reactivity and isotype profiling of monoclonal antibodies using multiple antigenic peptides

The characterisation of monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) is essential for the development of assay systems particularly where antigens have been developed using synthetic peptides. Indeed some peptide-carrier conjugates fail to induce immune responses and may not generate antibodies that bind to native protein. As an alternative to peptide-carrier conjugates, multiple antigenic peptides (MAPs) have been used for immunization strategies, but with little regard to the characteristics of the MAbs produced. In this study, we used 3 MAPs of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1) to immunise BALB/c mice. Overall, the polyclonal antibody responses from tail bleeds showed that MAPs evoked B-cell responses. However, on screening 144 hybridomas, 24 MAb supernatants exhibited weak to moderate reactivity in enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA) and against cell cytospin preparations (B95.8 and AG876 LCL), respectively. Isotype profiling of hybridoma supernatants also showed that 11 out of 24 were IgM. Further characterization of 6 MAbs in Western blotting showed reactivity to recombinant LMP1 and only one MAb (B28D) showed weak reactivity to the malignant cells (Hodgkin/Reed-Sternberg; HRS cells) of an EBV+ Hodgkin's lymphoma using paraffin-embedded tissue. It is probable that these MAPs failed to augment T-cell help and contributed to the production of low affinity (IgM) antibodies. These observations may be of importance to future immunization strategies, where MAPs are used in the production of monoclonal reagents.

Monoclonal antibodies

Monoclonal antibodies are essential tools for many molecular immunology investigations. In particular, when used in combination with techniques such as epitope mapping and molecular modelling, monoclonal antibodies enable the antigenic profiling and visualisation of macromolecular surfaces. In addition, monoclonal antibodies have become key components in a vast array of clinical laboratory diagnostic tests. Their wide application in detecting and identifying serum analytes, cell markers, and pathogenic agents has largely arisen through the exquisite specificity of these unique reagents. Furthermore, the continuous culture of hybridoma cells that produce these antibodies offers the potential of an unlimited supply of reagent. In essence, when compared with the rather limited supply of polyclonal antibody reagents, the feature of a continuous supply enables the standardisation of both the reagent and the assay technique. Clearly, polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies have their advantages and disadvantages in terms of generation, cost, and overall applications. Ultimately, monoclonal antibodies are only produced when necessary because their production is time consuming and frustrating, although greatly rewarding (at least most of the time!). This is especially apparent when a monoclonal antibody can be applied successfully in a routine pathology laboratory or can aid in the clinical diagnosis and treatment of patients. In this article, the generation and application of monoclonal antibodies are demystified to enable greater understanding and hopefully formulate novel ideas for clinicians and scientists alike.

Reactivity and assay restriction profiles of monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies to acid phosphatases: a preliminary study

The development of secure diagnostic immunoassays requires, among others, rigorous characterisation of potential antibody reagents. The reactivity profiles of seven antibodies (six monoclonal [MAb] and one polyclonal [PAb]) with putative specificity for tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) and/or osteoclasts were evaluated in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and/or immunocytochemistry. MAbs 2H1, 4E6 and 5Cl demonstrated assay restriction: exhibiting reactivity only in ELISA. The remaining three MAbs (G211D, G312G and V35B) and the PAb 8023 recognised recombinant TRAP (rTRAP) in ELISA and native acid phosphatases in selected tissues and cell lines. The latter were cytochemically assessed for both tartrate-sensitive acid phosphatase (TSAP) and TRAP. V35B showed reactivity against the monocytic leukaemia cell line U937 and guinea pig kidney tissue (both TSAP+ and TRAP+) and ECV304 (TSAP+) cells. Interestingly, the reactivity of MAb G211D co-localised with TRAP activity in the membrane of osteoclasts but also detected cytoplasmic components in U937 cells and human embryonic lung fibroblasts (TRAP+ and TRAP+). G211D exhibited immunoreactivity against placental trophoblasts (positive for total AP). Intriguingly, MAbs 2H1, 4E6, 5Cl and PAb 8023 cross-reacted with potato acid phosphatase in ELISA, suggesting reactivity to conformationally similar epitopes. Thus, some of these reagents could be used in the development of standardised diagnostic immunoassays or as drug-targeting agents for conditions in which the pathological process involves bone resorption, the MAbs G211D, 2H1, 4E6, 5Cl and PAb 8023 being useful in ELISA but not immunocytochemical detection of TRAP.

Generation and characterization of putative monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies against tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase

The generation of monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) specific for tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) may aid development of a serological immunoassay for this marker of bone resorption. The lack of MAbs to TRAP largely reflects the difficulty in obtaining sufficient antigen for in vivo immunization strategies. We have circumvented this problem by using in vitro immunization, requiring a small amount of TRAP isolated from osteoclastoma tumor. Two MAbs designated 312D and 310A were generated that exhibited weak anti-TRAP activity in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and immunocytochemistry. A polyclonal antibody to TRAP (Ab8023) was also raised in rabbit, using synthetic peptide. Ab8023 and MAbs 310A and 312D exhibited no activity against TRAP in dot-blotting experiments. Further characterization in enzyme-liked immunosorbent assay showed that Ab8023 was remarkably specific for TRAP whereas MAb 312D cross-reacted with another metalloenzyme, human prostatic acid phosphatase.

Characterisation of putative monoclonal anti-G3m(u) and anti-G3m(g) reagents and their antigenic determinants

Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) against IgG3 allotypic markers were evaluated in haemagglutination inhibition and IgG3 capture ELISA. MAbs PNF69C and 200D1 exhibited G3m(u) and G3m(g) specificity respectively. In HAI target epitopes detected by MAbs were remarkably stable to physiochemical degradation. Western blotting revealed that MAb 200D1, bound to intact IgG3 heavy chain disease protein and not its pFc' fragment; a result consistent with the CH2 domain location of the G3m(g) allotope. The G3m(u) allotope is also located within this domain. Surprisingly anti-G3m(u) MAb PNF69C bound to the pFc' of IgG3-related protein, HW, and to the pFc' of IgG1-related protein, PR, in Western blot.