Comparison of the effects of continuous subcutaneous infusion and split-mixed injection of insulin on nerve function in type I diabetes mellitus

Diabetic neuropathy part 1: overview and symmetric phenotypes

Diabetes is the most common cause of neuropathy in United States and neuropathies are the most common complication of diabetes mellitus, affecting up to 50% of patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Symptoms usually include numbness, tingling, pain, and weakness. Dizziness with postural changes can be seen with autonomic neuropathy. Metabolic, vascular, and immune theories have been proposed for the pathogenesis of diabetic neuropathy. Axonal damage and segmental demyelination can be seen with diabetic neuropathies. Management of diabetic neuropathy should begin at the initial diagnosis of diabetes and mainly requires tight and stable glycemic control.

Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) versus multiple insulin injections for type 1 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Type 1 diabetes is a metabolic disorder resulting from a defect in insulin secretion. Onset of type 1 diabetes mellitus may occur at any age and it is one of the most common chronic diseases of childhood and adolescence. Since there are no interventions known to prevent onset, it is vital that effective treatment regimes are available. Glycaemic control is maintained by replacement of insulin and may be in the form of 'conventional' insulin therapy (multiple injections per day) or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of CSII compared to multiple insulin injections (MI) in people with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Studies were obtained from electronic searches of The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies were included if they were randomised controlled trials comparing CSII with three or more insulin injections per day (MI) in people with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed risk of bias and extracted characteristics of included studies. Authors contacted study investigators to obtain missing information. Generic inverse variance meta-analyses using a random-effects model were performed.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty three studies randomised 976 participants with type 1 diabetes to either intervention. There was a statistically significant difference in glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) favouring CSII (weighted mean difference -0.3% (95% confidence interval -0.1 to -0.4). There were no obvious differences between the interventions for non-severe hypoglycaemia, but severe hypoglycaemia appeared to be reduced in those using CSII. Quality of life measures suggest that CSII is preferred over MI. No significant difference was found for weight. Adverse events were not well reported, no information is available on mortality, morbidity and costs.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is some evidence to suggest that CSII may be better than MI for glycaemic control in people with type 1 diabetes. Non-severe hypoglycaemic events do not appear to be reduced with CSII. There is insufficient evidence regarding adverse events, mortality, morbidity and costs.

Nerve conduction and autonomic nerve function in diabetic children. A 10-year follow-up study

In order to study the long-term development of diabetic neuropathy in children with newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus, 144 children were entered in a prospective study of nerve conduction and autonomic nervous function. Neurophysiological recordings of nerve conduction and parasympathetic function (R-R variations) were made at onset of diabetes and after 2, 5 and 10 years. Low sensory nerve conduction and autonomic dysfunction were found in approximately 25% of the children at onset of diabetes when the patients were not yet in complete remission. During years 0-2, an initial improvement of sensory conduction velocities was found. After 2 years, deteriorations in sensory and motor nerve conduction and autonomic nerve function were common and further deterioration was seen over time. A correlation was found between nerve conduction and glycaemic control.

Peripheral, but not central, nervous system abnormalities are reversed by pancreatic islet transplantation in diabetic Lewis rats

Neuroelectrophysiological recordings represent a non-invasive and reproducible method of detecting central and peripheral nervous system alterations in diabetes mellitus. In order to evaluate whether the normalization of metabolic control obtained by pancreatic islet transplantation could reverse diabetic neuroelectrophysiological alterations, or prevent further deterioration, we used an experimental model in which pancreatic islets (n = 1200) were injected into the portal vein of inbred Lewis rats (used as islet donors as well as recipients). Islets were injected 4 months after diabetes induction, since previous work had shown functional but not morphological damage at the nervous tissue level at this stage of the disease. Visual (V), brainstem auditory (BA) and somatosensory (S) evoked potentials (EPs) were measured in streptozotocin-induced, islet-recipient diabetic rats (n = 7), streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats (n = 16) and non-diabetic control rats (n = 12). Metabolic parameters and electrophysiological recordings were evaluated before diabetes induction, before transplantation and 4 months later. After transplantation, glycaemic levels returned to normal values within 1 week and remained so until the end of the study, as confirmed by a normal oral glucose tolerance test and by an increase in body weight. Electrophysiological recordings were altered in diabetic animals before transplantation. Four months after transplantation EP recordings improved, with a detectable gradient from the peripheral to the central structures. SEPs were significantly improved in the peripheral tarsus-L6 tract and the L6-cortex tract (P < 0.005 and P < 0.01 versus diabetic rats) and were ameliorated without achieving statistical significance in the central L6-cortex tract. BAEP latency values tended to improve in transplanted rats, but the differences versus non-transplanted diabetic animals failed to reach significance. VEP values remained clearly pathological and even deteriorated after transplantation. These results show that normalization of metabolic control by pancreatic islet transplantation can reverse some of the already established neuroelectrophysiological alterations at the peripheral nervous system level, but does not affect other alterations at the central nervous system level.

The effect of 8 years of strict glycaemic control on peripheral nerve function in IDDM patients: the Oslo Study

We have investigated the effect of long-term strict glycaemic control on peripheral and autonomic nerve function in 45 IDDM patients (age 18-42 years, diabetes duration 7-23 years) without clinical signs of neuropathy or other neurological disease. They were randomly assigned to treatment either with continuous insulin infusion, multiple injections (4-6 times daily), or conventional treatment (twice daily) for 4 years and followed prospectively for 8 years. Motor and sensory nerve conduction velocities were measured at the start and after 8 years. Autonomic nerve function tests were performed only once, after 8 years. A significant reduction of nerve conduction velocity was observed during 8 years in patients with mean HbA1 more than 10% (n = 12, group mean 10.9%, range 10.1-13.2%) compared to patients with HbA1 less than 10% (n = 33, group mean 9.0%, range 7.5-9.9%). Change of motor nerve conduction velocity in the peroneal nerve was: -4.8 +/- 4.9 (SD) vs -2.2 +/- 5.3 m/s (p < 0.01). Change of motor nerve conduction velocity in the posterior tibial nerve was: -6.8 +/- 5.7 vs- 3.9 +/- 5.1 m/s (p < 0.05). No significant changes were observed in the ulnar nerve. Change of sensoric nerve conduction velocity in the sural nerve was: -8.9 +/- 8.0 vs -4.6 +/- 5.3 m/s (p < 0.05). Multiple regression analysis showed that a change in HbA1 of 1% resulted in a 1.3 m/s change in nerve conduction velocity during 8 years.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effects of methylcobalamin on diabetic neuropathy

We studied the clinical and neurophysiological effects of methylcobalamin on patients with diabetic neuropathy. In a double-blind study, the active group showed statistical improvement in the somatic and autonomic symptoms with regression of signs of diabetic neuropathy. Motor and sensory nerve conduction studies showed no statistical improvement after 4 months. The drug was easily tolerated by the patients and no side effects were encountered.

Diagnosis of Maryland/German familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy using allele-specific, enzymatically amplified, genomic DNA

Diagnoses of familial amyloidotic polyneuropathies have been traditionally based on attempts to distinguish clinical features and ancestry or geographic origin of cases. Most are associated with extracellular deposition of a variant prealbumin (also known as transthyretin). Recent molecular studies demonstrated eight distinct amyloid-associated point mutations in the prealbumin gene on the long arm of chromosome 18 that are associated with hereditary amyloidosis. These findings provide for means of diagnosis using recombinant DNA methods. In a family with the Maryland/German type of familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy, the proband and 2 of 5 at-risk offspring were diagnosed using the polymerase chain reaction. Allele-specific enzymatic amplification of genomic DNA demonstrated the histidine-58 variant prealbumin gene. This study confirms the point mutation of the prealbumin gene as a cause for this type of familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy. Preclinical diagnosis illustrates the potential for development of treatment strategies prior to disease onset.

Effects of pancreatic transplantation on diabetic neuropathy

Reestablishment of the euglycemic state by successful transplantation of the pancreas might halt or reverse diabetic neuropathy. To test this possibility we evaluated neurologic function by clinical examination, nerve conduction studies, and autonomic-function tests in patients with insulin-dependent (Type I) diabetes mellitus before and after successful pancreatic transplantation. Sixty-one patients were studied before and 12 months after transplantation, 27 again after 24 months, and 11 again after 42 months. A control group of patients with Type I diabetes treated with insulin underwent the same studies at similar intervals--48 patients before and after 12 months had elapsed, 21 again after 24 months, and 12 again after 42 months. In the control group, neuropathy tended to worsen during the follow-up period. The scores on the clinical examination indicated increased impairment after 12 months. Composite indexes of the degree of abnormality found on neurophysiologic testing of the function of peripheral motor, sensory, and autonomic nerves indicated decreased autonomic function after 12 months. The examination score and the three index values worsened slightly but not significantly in the patients followed for 24 and 42 months. In contrast, in the patients who had received pancreatic transplants, the neuropathy tended to improve. There was significant improvement in the motor and sensory indexes 12 months after transplantation and in the sensory index 24 months after transplantation. The other measures improved slightly but not significantly at these times, as did all four measures in the patients studied 42 months after transplantation. We conclude that the progression of diabetic polyneuropathy may be halted through the restoration of a euglycemic state by successful pancreatic transplantation.