Lack of antinociceptive cross-tolerance between intracerebroventricularly administered beta-endorphin and morphine or DPDPE in mice

αN-Acetyl β-Endorphin Is an Endogenous Ligand of σ1Rs That Regulates Mu-Opioid Receptor Signaling by Exchanging G Proteins for σ2Rs in σ1R Oligomers

The opioid peptide β-endorphin coexists in the pituitary and brain in its ^αN-acetylated form, which does not bind to opioid receptors. We now report that these neuropeptides exhibited opposite effects in in vivo paradigms, in which ligands of the sigma type 1 receptor (σ1R) displayed positive effects. Thus, ^αN-acetyl β-Endorphin reduced vascular infarct caused by permanent unilateral middle cerebral artery occlusion and diminished the incidence of N-methyl-D-aspartate acid-promoted convulsive syndrome and mechanical allodynia caused by unilateral chronic constriction of the sciatic nerve. Moreover, ^αN-acetyl β-Endorphin reduced the analgesia of morphine, β-Endorphin and clonidine but enhanced that of DAMGO. All these effects were counteracted by β-Endorphin and absent in σ1R^-/- mice. We observed that σ1Rs negatively regulate mu-opioid receptor (MOR)-mediated morphine analgesia by binding and sequestering G proteins. In this scenario, β-Endorphin promoted the exchange of σ2Rs by G proteins at σ1R oligomers and increased the regulation of G proteins by MORs. The opposite was observed for the ^αN-acetyl derivative, as σ1R oligomerization decreased and σ2R binding was favored, which displaced G proteins; thus, MOR-regulated transduction was reduced. Our findings suggest that the pharmacological β-Endorphin-specific epsilon receptor is a σ1R-regulated MOR and that β-Endorphin and ^αN-acetyl β-Endorphin are endogenous ligands of σ1R.

Interactive Mechanisms of Supraspinal Sites of Opioid Analgesic Action: A Festschrift to Dr. Gavril W. Pasternak

Almost a half century of research has elaborated the discoveries of the central mechanisms governing the analgesic responses of opiates, including their receptors, endogenous peptides, genes and their putative spinal and supraspinal sites of action. One of the central tenets of "gate-control theories of pain" was the activation of descending supraspinal sites by opiate drugs and opioid peptides thereby controlling further noxious input. This review in the Special Issue dedicated to the research of Dr. Gavril Pasternak indicates his contributions to the understanding of supraspinal mediation of opioid analgesic action within the context of the large body of work over this period. This review will examine (a) the relevant supraspinal sites mediating opioid analgesia, (b) the opioid receptor subtypes and opioid peptides involved, (c) supraspinal site analgesic interactions and their underlying neurophysiology, (d) molecular (particularly AS) tools identifying opioid receptor actions, and (e) relevant physiological variables affecting site-specific opioid analgesia. This review will build on classic initial studies, specify the contributions that Gavril Pasternak and his colleagues did in this specific area, and follow through with studies up to the present.

Involvement of mouse μ-opioid receptor splice variants in the spinal antinociception induced by the dermorphin tetrapeptide analog amidino-TAPA

The involvement of the mouse μ-opioid receptor (mMOR-1) splice variants in the antinociceptive effect of intrathecally (i.t.) administered N(α)-amidino-Tyr-D-Arg-Phe-β-Ala (amidino-TAPA) and [D-Ala(2),N-MePhe(4),Gly-ol(5)]enkephalin (DAMGO) was investigated in mice by monitoring the recovery from acute antinociceptive tolerance to amidino-TAPA and DAMGO. A single i.t. pretreatment with DAMGO produced an acute antinociceptive tolerance, which peaked at 2h and disappeared within 5h after the pretreatment. In contrast, a single i.t. pretreatment with amidino-TAPA produced an acute antinociceptive tolerance, which disappeared within 3h after the pretreatment. The concomitant i.t. pretreatment with an antisense oligodeoxynucleotide (ODN) for exon-1, exon-12, exon-13 or exon-14 of mMOR-1 maintained the acute antinociceptive tolerance to amidino-TAPA for 24h after the pretreatment. On the other hand, the concomitant i.t. pretreatment with an antisense ODN for exon-1 of mMOR-1, but not an antisense ODN for exon-12, exon-13 or exon-14 of mMOR-1, maintained the acute antinociceptive tolerance to DAMGO for 24h after the pretreatment. The present results suggest that the spinal antinociception of amidino-TAPA is partially mediated through the activation of the amidino-TAPA-sensitive and DAMGO-insensitive mMOR-1 splice variants MOR-1J, MOR-1K and MOR-1L, which contain the sequence encoded by exon-12, exon-13 and exon-14, respectively.

The differential effect of morphine and beta-endorphin administered intracerebroventricularly on pERK and pCaMK-II expression induced by various nociceptive stimuli in mice brains

The present study was performed to characterize the differential molecular mechanisms of morphine and beta-endorphin which are injected intracerebroventiricularly in mice. In the immunoblot assay, the increases of phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase (pERK) as well as phosphorylated calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IIalpha (pCaMK-IIalpha) expression induced by noxious stimuli were attenuated by intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) beta-endorphin pretreatment in the hypothalamus, but not by i.c.v. morphine pretreatment. In addition to these immunoblot results, immunohistochemical study also showed that the attenuation of pERK or pCaMK-IIalpha immunoreactivity elicited by i.c.v. pretreatment of beta-endorphin mainly occurred in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVN). We also investigated the effect of morphine and beta-endorphin on pERK and pCaMK-IIalpha expression in the locus coeruleus (LC). I.c.v. injection of morphine significantly increased pERK as well as pCaMK-IIalpha expression in the locus coeruleus, while beta-endorphin increased only pCaMK-IIalpha in the LC. In addition, beta-endorphin significantly attenuated pERK expression induced by SP i.t. injection. These results suggest that the antinociceptive effects of supraspinally administered morphine and beta-endorphin are involved with differentially intracellular signal transduction molecules-pERK, pCaMK-IIalpha in the PVN and the LC.

Roles of endogenous opioid peptides in modulation of nocifensive response to formalin

Roles of endogenous opioid peptides and their receptors in modulation of the nocifensive responses to formalin in mice were studied. Mice were pretreated i.c.v. or intrathecally (i.t.) with selective opioid receptor antagonists or intrathecally with antisera against endogenous opioid peptides and the nocifensive licking responses to intraplantar injection of formalin (0.5%, 25 microl) were then observed. Pretreatment with the epsilon-opioid receptor antagonist beta-endorphin(1-27) or the selective mu-opioid receptor antagonist D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-Orn-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH(2) (CTOP) given i.c.v. dose dependently enhanced the second, but not the first phase of the nocifensive response. However, i.c.v. pretreatment with the selective delta-receptor antagonist naltrindole or kappa-receptor antagonist nor-binaltrophimine did not affect the nocifensive responses. Intrathecal pretreatment with selective delta(1)-opioid antagonist 7-benzylidene naltrexamine significantly enhanced both the first and second phases of nocifension. Intrathecal pretreatment with CTOP also increased the second but not the first phase of the nocifension. However, i.t. pretreatment with the selective delta(2)-receptor antagonist naltriben or nor-binaltrophimine did not affect the second phase of the nocifension. Intrathecal pretreatment with antiserum against Leu-enkephalin, Met-enkephalin, or dynorphin A(1-17), but not beta-endorphin, enhanced only the second phase of nocifensive response to formalin. It is concluded that the blockade of epsilon- and mu-receptors, but not delta- or kappa-receptors, at the supraspinal sites enhanced the second phase of formalin-induced nocifension. In the spinal cord, Leu-enkephalin, and to a lesser extent, Met-enkephalin and dynorphin A(1-17) and mu- and delta(1)-opioid receptors, but not delta(2)- or kappa-opioid receptors, are involved in modulating the feedback inhibition of the second phase of formalin-induced nocifension.

Evidence for epsilon-opioid receptor-mediated beta-endorphin-induced analgesia

Among the opioid receptors, which have been pharmacologically classified as mu, delta, kappa and epsilon, the existence of the epsilon receptor has been controversial, and this receptor is generally not recognized as a member of the opioid peptide receptor family because it has not been precisely characterized. However, results from pharmacological, physiological and opioid receptor binding studies clearly indicate the presence of epsilon-opioid receptors, which are distinct from mu-, delta- or kappa-opioid receptors. This putative epsilon-opioid receptor is stimulated supraspinally by the endogenous opioid peptide beta-endorphin, which induces the release of Met-enkephalin, which, in turn, acts on spinal delta2-opioid receptors to produce antinociception. In this article, this beta-endorphin-sensitive epsilon-opioid receptor-mediated descending pain control system, which is distinct from that activated by the mu-opioid receptor agonist morphine, is described and the physiological role of the beta-endorphin-mediated system in pain control activated by cold-water swimming and intraplantar injection of formalin is discussed.

Supraspinal NMDA and non-NMDA receptors are differentially involved in the production of antinociception by morphine and beta-endorphin administered intracerebroventricularly in the formalin pain model

Our previous studies have demonstrated that supraspinal glutamate receptors are differentially involved in the antinociception induced by morphine and beta-endorphin given intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) in the tail-flick and hot-plate tests. The formalin pain test was used in the present study. Injection of mice with formalin solution (2%, 10 microl) into the hindpaw intraplantarly produced the first (0-5 min) and second (20-40 min) phases of formalin responses. The formalin responses in the both phases were attenuated dose-dependently by morphine (0.125-1 microg) or beta-endorphin (0.125-1 microg) administered i.c.v. 5 min before. The antinociceptive effect of morphine was slightly more potent in the second phase whereas the effect of beta-endorphin was more pronounced in the first phase. MK-801 (0.1-1 microg), a non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist, and CNQX (0.05-0.5 microg), a non-NMDA antagonist, given i.c.v., produced antinociceptive effect in the both phases, but only in a partial manner. Both MK-801 (0.05 microg) and CNQX (0.01 microg), at the dose which had no intrinsic effect, reversed the antinociceptive effect of beta-endorphin (1 microg) observed during the second, but not the first, phase partially but significantly. However, the antinociceptive effect of morphine (1 microg) was not affected by the same dose of MK-801 or CNQX given i.c.v. Our results indicate that, at the supraspinal level, both NMDA and non-NMDA receptors are involved in the production of antinociception induced by supraspinally administered beta-endorphin, but not morphine, in the formalin pain model.

Differential potentiative effects of glutamate receptor antagonists in the production of antinociception induced by opioids administered intrathecally in the mouse

The effect of (+/-)-5-methyl-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo(a,d) cyclohepten-5, 10-imine maleate (MK-801) or 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX) injected intrathecally (i.t.) on the inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by morphine, D-Ala(2)-NmePhe(4)-Gly-ol-enkephalin (DAMGO), beta-endorphin, D-Pen(2,5)-enkephalin (DPDPE), or ¿(trans-3, 4-dichloro-N-methyl-N-[2-(1-pyrrolidinyl) cyclohexyl] benzeocetamide)¿ (U50, 488H) administered i.t. was studied in ICR mice. The i.t. injection of MK-801 (2 microg) or CNQX (1 microg) alone did not affect the basal tail-flick response. Morphine (0.2 microg), DAMGO (0.8 ng), beta-endorphin (0.1 microg), DPDPE (0.5 microg) or U50, 488H (6 microg) caused only slight inhibition of the tail-flick response. CNQX injected i.t., but not MK-801, enhanced the inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by i.t. administered morphine, DAMGO, DPDPE or U50, 488H. However, CNQX or MK-801 injected i.t. was not effective in enhancing the inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by beta-endorphin administered i.t. The potentiating effect of CNQX on tail-flick inhibition induced by morphine, DAMGO, DPDPE or U50, 488H was blocked by naloxone (from 1 to 20 microg), yohimbine (from 1 to 20 microg) or methysergide (from 1 to 20 microg) injected i.t. in a dose-dependent manner. Our results suggest that the blockade of AMPA/kainate receptors located in the spinal cord appears to be involved in enhancing the inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by stimulation of spinal mu-, delta-, and kappa-opioid receptors. Furthermore, this potentiating action may be mediated by spinal noradrenergic and serotonergic receptors. However, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors may not be involved in modulating the inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by various opioids administered spinally.

Analysis of sex and gonadectomy differences in beta-endorphin antinociception elicited from the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray in rats

Male rats exhibit significantly greater antinociception following central administration of morphine than female rats. The present study examined potential differences in beta-endorphin (5.2-26 microg) antinociception elicited from the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray in adult sham-operated and gonadectomized male and female rats. Male rats displayed significantly greater peak (30 min) tail-flick latencies across the entire range of beta-endorphin doses administered into the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray than female rats tested during the estrous phase of the estrous cycle. Adult gonadectomy failed to appreciably change the pattern of this effect in either males of females. Thus, antinociception elicited from the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray by beta-endorphin, like morphine, is sensitive to sex differences.

Differential potentiative effects of GABA receptor agonists in the production of antinociception induced by morphine and beta-endorphin administered intrathecally in the mouse

The effect of muscimol or baclofen injected intrathecally (i.t.) on the inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by morphine and beta-endorphin administered i.t. was studied in ICR mice. The i.t. injection of muscimol (100 ng) or baclofen (10 ng) alone did not affect the basal inhibition of the tail-flick response. Morphine (0.2 microg) and beta-endorphin (0.1 microg) caused only slight inhibition of the tail-flick response. Baclofen, but not muscimol, injected i.t. enhanced the inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by i.t. administered morphine. Both muscimol and baclofen injected i.t. significantly enhanced i.t. injected beta-endorphin-induced inhibition of the tail-flick response. Our results suggest that the GABA(B), but not GABA(A), receptors located in the spinal cord appear to be involved in enhancing the inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by morphine administered spinally. In addition, both GABA(A) and GABA(B) receptors are involved in enhancing the inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by beta-endorphin administered i.t.

Actions of NMDA and cholinergic receptor antagonists in the rostral ventromedial medulla upon beta-endorphin analgesia elicited from the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray

Analgesia elicited by morphine in the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray is mediated in part by NMDA and cholinergic receptors in the rostral ventromedial medulla because selective receptor antagonists applied to the latter structure reduced morphine analgesia elicited from the former structure. Previous studies have demonstrated that morphine and beta-endorphin employ different anatomical and neurochemical pathways in exerting their supraspinal analgesic effects. The present study evaluated whether pretreatment with either competitive (AP7, 3-10 microg) or non-competitive (MK-801, 3-10 microg) NMDA antagonists, or muscarinic (scopolamine, 5 microg) or nicotinic (mecamylamine, 1 microg) cholinergic antagonists administered into the rostral ventromedial medulla altered beta-endorphin (15 microg) analgesia elicited from the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray as measured by the tail-flick and jump tests in rats. Whereas AP7 produced minimal (11%) and transient (30 min) reductions in beta-endorphin analgesia on the jump test, MK-801 produced minimal (9%) and transient (30 min) reductions in beta-endorphin analgesia on the tail-flick test. Whereas mecamylamine failed to reduce beta-endorphin analgesia on either measure, scopolamine produced small (23%) and transient (30 min) reductions in beta-endorphin analgesia on the tail-flick test. Each of these antagonists administered into the rostral ventromedial medulla at comparable or lower doses virtually eliminated morphine analgesia elicited from the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray. The opioid mediation of beta-endorphin analgesia in the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray was confirmed by its sensitivity to naltrexone (1-20 microg) pretreatment into the same structure. These data provide further evidence for dissociations between the descending neuroanatomical and neurochemical circuitry mediating the supraspinal analgesic responses induced by morphine and beta-endorphin, and indicate that the latter response is mediated by either non-cholinergic and non-NMDA synapses within the rostral ventromedial medulla, and/or by brainstem sites outside of the rostral ventromedial medulla.

Tolerance and morphine-induced cross-tolerance are not shown to Tyr-W-MIF-1 analgesia

Tolerance and cross-tolerance between Tyr-W-MIF-1, a mixed micro-agonist/antagonist, and morphine were examined. Opiate dependence also was examined. Rats were pretreated with Tyr-W-MIF-1, morphine, or saline for 4 days. On day 5, the animals were tested for Tyr-W-MIF-1 analgesia, morphine analgesia, or naloxone-precipitated withdrawal. Tyr-W-MIF-1- and morphine-pretreated animals showed similar levels of dependence. Animals pretreated with Tyr-W-MIF-1 failed to express tolerance to Tyr-W-MIF-1 analgesia but did display cross-tolerance to morphine analgesia. Animals pretreated with morphine displayed tolerance to morphine analgesia but did not express cross-tolerance to Tyr-W-MIF-1 analgesia. Therefore, tolerance and morphine-induced cross-tolerance were not expressed to Tyr-W-MIF-1 analgesia.

Opioid supraspinal analgesic synergy between the amygdala and periaqueductal gray in rats

Analgesia can be elicited following microinjections of morphine, mu-selective agonists and beta-endorphin into the amygdala. These analgesic responses are mediated by opioid synapses in the periaqueductal gray (PAG) since general (naltrexone), mu (beta-funaltrexamine) and delta2 (naltrindole isothiocyanate) opioid antagonists administered into the PAG significantly reduce both morphine and beta-endorphin analgesia elicited from the amygdala. Supraspinal multiplicative opiate analgesic interactions have been observed between the PAG and rostroventromedial medulla (RVM), the PAG and locus coeruleus (LC), and the RVM and LC. The present study further examined the relationship between the amygdala and PAG in analgesic responsiveness by determining whether multiplicative analgesic interactions occur following paired administration of subthreshold doses of morphine into both structures, beta-endorphin into both structures, morphine into one structure and beta-endorphin into the other structure, or morphine and beta-endorphin into one structure. Co-administration of subthreshold doses of morphine into both the amygdala and PAG results in a profound synergistic interaction on the jump test, but not the tail-flick test. Co-administration of subthreshold doses of beta-endorphin into both structures also results in a profound test-specific synergistic interaction. In both cases, the magnitude of the interaction was similar regardless of the site receiving the fixed dose of the opioid, and the site receiving the variable dose of the opioid. Co-administration of beta-endorphin (1 microg) into the amygdala and morphine (1 microg) into the PAG produced a potent interaction, but co-administration of morphine (1 microg) into the amygdala and beta-endorphin (1 microg) into the PAG failed to produce interactive effects. Finally, co-administration of morphine (1 microg) and beta-endorphin (1 microg) into either the amygdala alone or the PAG alone failed to produce an interaction, indicating the importance of regional opioid activation. These data are discussed in terms of the test-specificity of nociceptive processing in the amygdala, in terms of the multiple modulatory mechanisms mediating beta-endorphin analgesia in the PAG, and in terms of whether the interactions are either mediated by anatomical connections between the amygdala and PAG or by mechanisms initiated by these two sites converging at another site or sites.

Differential effects of adenosine receptor antagonists injected intrathecally on antinociception induced by morphine and beta-endorphin administered intracerebroventricularly in the mouse

A previous study reported that beta-endorphin and morphine administered supraspinally produce antinociception by activating different descending pain inhibitory systems. The present study was designed to investigate the blocking effects of A1 or A2 adenosine receptors in the spinal cord on antinociception induced by supraspinally administered mu- and epsilon-opioid receptor agonists. The effects of 1,3-dipropyl-8-(2-amino-4-chloro-phenyl)-xanthine (PACPX; an A1 adenosine receptor antagonist) or 3,7-dimethyl-1-propargylxanthine (DMPX; an A2 adenosine receptor antagonist) on the antinociception induced by morphine (a mu-opioid receptor agonist) or beta-endorphin (an epsilon-opioid receptor agonist) administered intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) were studied. The antinociception was assayed by the tail-flick test. DMPX at doses of 1-40 micrograms (which administered intrathecally alone did not affect the latencies of tail-flick thresholds), attenuated dose-dependently the inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by i.c.v. administered morphine (0.5 microgram) or beta-endorphin (1 microgram). PACPX at doses of 1-40 micrograms (which administered intrathecally alone did not affect the latencies of tail-flick thresholds), attenuated dose-dependently the inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by i.c.v. administered beta-endorphin but not morphine. These results suggest that A2 but not A1 adenosine receptors in the spinal cord may be involved in the antinociception induced by supraspinally administered morphine, while the antinociception induced by supraspinally administered beta-endorphin appears to be mediated by spinal A1 and A2 adenosine receptors. These results support the hypothesis that morphine and beta-endorphin administered supraspinally produce antinociception by different neuronal mechanisms.

The effect of pretreatment with a delta 2-opioid receptor antisense oligodeoxynucleotide on the recovery from acute antinociceptive tolerance to delta 2-opioid receptor agonist in the mouse spinal cord

1. An intrathecal (i.t.) injection of a selective delta 2-opioid receptor agonist, [D-Ala2]deltorphin II, produced an acute antinociceptive tolerance to the antinociceptive effect of a subsequent i.t. challenge of [D-Ala2]deltorphin II. This acute tolerance lasted 3 to 9 h and completely subsided by 12 h. The experiments were designed to examine the effect of pretreatment with an antisense oligodeoxynucleotide to delta 2-opioid receptor mRNA (delta-AS oligo) on the recovery from tolerance to [D-Ala2]deltorphin II-induced antinociception in male ICR mice. 2. Pretreatment with delta-AS oligo (1.63 to 163 pmol, i.t.), but not mismatched oligo (MM oligo) (163 pmol), prevented the recovery from acute tolerance to [D-Ala2]deltorphin II-induced antinociception in a dose-dependent manner. However, treatment with delta-AS oligo (163 pmol) did not prevent the recovery from tolerance to either the mu-opioid receptor agonist [D-Ala2,NMePhe4,Gly(ol)5]enkephalin (DAMGO) or the kappa-opioid receptor agonist U50,488H, indicating subtype specificity in the mechanism by which delta-AS oligo inhibits recovery from delta 2-opioid tolerance. 3. Treatment with [D-Ala2]deltorphin II (i.t.) significantly reduced the binding of [tyrosyl-3,5-(3)H(N)]-Tyr-D-Ser-Gly-Phe-Leu-Thr ([3H]-DSLET), a delta 2-opioid receptor agonist ligand, in the spinal cord 3 h after treatment, but binding returned to control levels by 24 h after treatment. However, [3H]-DSLET binding in the spinal cord remained significantly reduced at 24 h if delta-AS oligo (163 pmol) was coadministered with [D-Ala2]deltorphin II (6.4 nmol). 4. Based on these findings, it is concluded that a single stimulation of spinal cord delta 2-opioid receptors by intrathecally-administered [D-Ala2]deltorphin II induces a long-lasting desensitization of delta 2-opioid receptors to [D-Ala2]deltorphin II. Recovery from delta 2-opioid receptor-mediated antinociceptive tolerance apparently depends on replenishment by newly synthesized delta 2-opioid receptor protein rather than immediate reversal of delta 2-opioid receptors.

Opioid antagonists in the periaqueductal gray inhibit morphine and beta-endorphin analgesia elicited from the amygdala of rats

In addition to brainstem sites of action, analgesia can be elicited following amygdala microinjections of morphine and mu-selective opioid agonists. The present study examined whether opioid analgesia elicited by either morphine or beta-endorphin in the amygdala could be altered by either the general opioid antagonist, naltrexone, the mu-selective antagonist, beta-funaltrexamine (BFNA) or the delta 2 antagonist, naltrindole isothiocyanate (Ntii) in the periaqueductal gray (PAG). Both morphine (2.5-5 micrograms) and beta-endorphin (2.5-5 micrograms) microinjected into either the baso-lateral or central nuclei of the amygdala significantly increased tail-flick latencies and jump thresholds in rats. The increases were far more pronounced on the jump test than on the tail-flick test. Placements dorsal and medial to the amygdala were ineffective. Naltrexone (1-5 micrograms) in the PAG significantly reduced both morphine (tail-flick: 70-75%; jump: 60-81%) and beta-endorphin (tail-flick: 100%; jump: 93%) analgesia elicited from the amygdala, indicating that an opioid synapse in the PAG was integral for the full expression of analgesia elicited from the amygdala by both agonists. Both BFNA (68%) and Ntii (100%) in the PAG significantly reduced morphine, but not beta-endorphin analgesia in the amygdala on the tail-flick test. Ntii in the PAG was more effective in reducing morphine (60%) and beta-endorphin (79%) analgesia in the amygdala on the jump test than BFNA (15-24%). Opioid agonist-induced analgesia in the amygdala was unaffected by opioid antagonists administered into control misplacements in the lateral mesencephalon, and the small hyperalgesia elicited by opioid antagonists in the PAG could not account for the reductions in opioid agonist effects in the amygdala. These data indicate that PAG delta 2, and to a lesser degree, mu opioid receptors are necessary for the full expression of morphine and beta-endorphin analgesia elicited from the amygdala.

Effects of intrathecally injected histamine receptor antagonists on the antinociception induced by morphine, beta-endorphin, and U50, 488H administered intrathecally in the mouse

The present study was designed to investigate the modulatory effects of blockade of spinal histamine receptors on antinociception induced by spinally administered morphine, beta-endorphin and U50, 488H. The effects of intrathecal (i.t.) injections with cyproheptadine (a histamine-1 (H1) receptor antagonist), ranitidine (an H2 receptor antagonist), or thioperamide (an H3 receptor antagonist) injected i.t., on the antinociception induced by morphine, beta-endorphin or trans-3,4-dichloro-N-methyl-N-[2-(1-pyrrolidinyl) cyclohexyl] benzeocetamide (U50, 488H) injected intrathecally (i.t.) were studied. The antinociception was assayed using the tail-flick test. The i.t. injection of cyproheptadine (20 micrograms), ranitidine (20 micrograms), or thioperamide (20 micrograms) alone did not produce any antinociceptive effect. i.t. pretreatment with cyproheptadine attenuated the inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by i.t. administered morphine or beta-endorphin, but not U50, 488H. In addition, i.t. pretreatment with ranitidine attenuated the inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by i.t. administered morphine, beta-endorphin, or U50, 488H. Furthermore, the i.t. pretreatment with thioperamide attenuated the inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by beta-endorphin or U50, 488H, but not morphine, administered i.t. Our results indicate that spinal H1 receptors may be involved in the production of antinociception induced by spinally applied morphine or beta-endorphin- but not U50, 488H. Spinal H2 receptors appear to be involved in spinally administered morphine-, beta-endorphin- and U50, 488H-induced antinociception. Supraspinal histamine H3 receptors may be involved in the production of antinociception induced by supraspinally applied beta-endorphin or U50, 488H, but not morphine.

Nicotine enhances morphine- and beta-endorphin-induced antinociception at the supraspinal level in the mouse

The effect of nicotine administered supraspinally on antinociception induced by supraspinally administered opioids was examined in ICR mice. The intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection of nicotine alone at doses from 1 to 12 micrograms produced only a minimal inhibition of the tail-flick response. Morphine (0.2 micrograms), beta-endorphin (0.1 microgram), D-Pen2.5-enkephalin (DPDPE; 0.5 microgram), trans-3,4-dichloro-N-methyl-N-[2-(1-pyrrolidinyl) cyclohexyl] benzeocetamide (U50, 488H; 6 micrograms) caused only slight inhibition of the tail-flick response. Nicotine dose dependently enhanced inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by i.c.v. administered morphine (0.2 microgram) or beta-endorphin (0.1 microgram). The degree of enhancing effect of nicotine toward beta-endorphin-induced inhibition of the tail-flick response was greater than toward morphine-induced inhibition of the tail-flick response. However, i.c.v. administered nicotine at the same doses was not effective in enhancing the inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by DPDPE (0.5 microgram) or U50, 488H (6 micrograms) administered i.c.v. Our results suggest that stimulation of supraspinal nicotinic receptors may enhance antinociception induced by morphine (a mu-opioid receptor agonist) and beta-endorphin (an epsilon-opioid receptor agonist) administered supraspinally. However, the activation of nicotinic receptors at supraspinal sites may not be involved in enhancing the antinociception induced by DPDPE (a delta-opioid receptor agonist) or U50, 488H (a kappa-opioid receptor agonist) administered supraspinally.

Antinociceptive mechanisms of dipsacus saponin C administered intracerebroventricularly in the mouse

1. Dipsacus saponin C (DSC) administered intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) showed an antinociceptive effect in a dose-dependent (from 3.75 to 30 micrograms) manner as measured by the tailflick assay. The antinociception induced by DSC at the dose of 30 micrograms was maintained at least 1 h. 2. Sulfated cholecystokinin (CCK, from 0.1 to 0.5 ng); muscimol (a GABAA receptor agonist, from 50 to 200 ng); MK-801 [(+/-)-5-methyl-10, 11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo (a,d) cyclohepten-5, 10-imine maleate, from 0.1 to 1 microgram], a noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptor antagonist; or CNQX (6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione, from 0.1 to 0.5 microgram), a non-NMDA receptor antagonist, injected i.c.v. significantly reduced the inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by DSC (30 micrograms) administered i.c.v. However, naloxone (an opioid receptor antagonist, 2 micrograms) or baclofen (a GABAB receptor antagonist, 10 ng) did not affect the inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by DSC. 3. The intrathecal (i.t.) injection of yohimbine (an alpha 2-adrenergic receptor antagonist, from 5 to 20 micrograms) and methysergide (a serotonin receptor antagonist, from 5 to 20 micrograms) but not naloxone (from 2 to 8 micrograms), significantly attenuated inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by DSC (30 micrograms) administered i.c.v. 4. Our results suggest that DSC has an antinociceptive effect when it is administered supraspinally and GABAA, NMDA and non-NMDA receptors, but not opioid and GABAB receptors located at the supraspinal level, may be involved in DSC-induced antinociception. Furthermore, DSC administered supraspinally may produce antinociception by stimulating descending alpha 2-adrenergic and serotonin pathways but not the opioidergic pathway.

Intrathecally injected nicotine enhances the antinociception induced by morphine but not beta-endorphin, D-Pen2,5-enkephalin and U50,488H administered intrathecally in the mouse

The effect of nicotine injected intrathecally (i.t.) on the inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by morphine, beta-endorphin, D-Pen2,5-enkephalin (DPDPE), or [(trans-3,4-dichloro-N-methyl-N-[2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)cyclohexyl] benzeocetamide)] (U50,488H) administered i.t. was studied in ICR mice. The i.t. injection of nicotine alone at doses from 1 to 12 microg produced only a minimal inhibition of the tail-flick response. Morphine (0.2 microg), beta-endorphin (0.1 microg), DPDPE (0.5 microg) or U50,488H (6 microg) caused only slight inhibition of the tail-flick response. Nicotine injected i.t. dose dependently enhanced the inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by i.t. administered morphine (0.2 microg). However, i.t. injected nicotine at the same doses was not effective in enhancing the inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by beta-endorphin, DPDPE, or U50,488H administered i.t. Our results suggest that stimulating nicotinic receptors located in the spinal cord may enhance the antinociception induced by morphine administered spinally. However, the activation of nicotinic receptors at the spinal level may not be involved in modulating the antinociception induced by beta-endorphin, DPDPE, and U50,488H administered spinally.

Effects of GABA receptor antagonists injected spinally on antinociception induced by opioids administered supraspinally in mice

The present study was designed to investigate the modulatory effects of blockade of spinal GABAA and GABAB receptors on antinociception induced by supraspinally administered mu- and epsilon-opioid receptor agonists. The effects of intrathecal (i.t.) injections with GABAA and GABAB receptor antagonists, SR 95531 [2-(3-carboxypropyl)-3-amino-6-(4-mehylphenyl)pyridazinium bromide] and 5-aminovaleric acid, respectively, on the antinociception induced by morphine (a mu-opioid receptor agonist) and beta-endorphin (an epsilon-opioid receptor agonist) injected intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) were studied. Antinociception was assayed using the tail-flick test. The i.t. injection of SR 95531 (0.04-0.16 nmol) and 5-aminovaleric acid (32.5-130 nmol), administered alone did not affect the latencies of the tail-flick response, but selectively antagonized the inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by muscimol (a GABAA receptor agonist) and baclofen (a GABAB receptor agonist), respectively. The i.t. injection of SR 95531 attenuated dose-dependently the inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by i.c.v. administered morphine, without affecting the i.c.v. administered beta-endorphin-induced response. 5-Aminovaleric acid attenuated dose-dependently the inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by beta-endorphin, without affecting the response to i.c.v. administered morphine. Our results indicate that GABAA but not GABAB receptors located at the spinal cord appears to be involved in the antinociception induced by morphine administered supraspinally whereas GABAB but not GABAA receptors located at the spinal cord may be involved in the antinociception induced by supraspinally administered beta-endorphin, supporting further the hypothesis that morphine and beta-endorphin administered supraspinally produce their antinociception via the activation of different descending pain inhibitory systems.

Differential effects of forskolin and phorbol-13-myristate injected intrathecally or intracerebroventricularly on antinociception induced by morphine or beta-endorphin administered intracerebroventricularly in the mouse

The effects of forskolin or phorbol-13-myristate (PMA) injected intrathecally (i.t.) or intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) on the inhibition of the tail-flick and hotplate responses induced by morphine or beta-endorphin administered i.c.v. were studied. Animals pretreated with forskolin (20 micrograms) i.t. for 10 min had an attenuated inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by i.c.v. administered morphine (2 micrograms) or beta-endorphin (1 microgram). However, i.t. pretreatment with PMA (100 ng) was not effective in reducing the inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by morphine or beta-endorphin administered i.c.v. In addition, i.t. pretreatment with either forskolin or PMA did not affect the inhibition of the hotplate response induced by morphine or beta-endorphin administered i.c.v. Forskolin pretreatment i.c.v. for 10 min attenuated the inhibition of the tail-flick and hotplate responses induced by i.c.v. administered morphine or beta-endorphin. However, i.c.v. pretreatment with PMA was not effective in reducing the inhibition of the tail-flick or hotplate responses induced by morphine or beta-endorphin administered i.c.v. Our results suggest that activation of adenylate cyclase located at both spinal and supraspinal sites appears to be involved in antagonizing antinociception induced by morphine and beta-endorphin administered supraspinally. However, spinal or supraspinal protein kinase C may not be involved in antagonizing antinociception induced by morphine or beta-endorphin administered supraspinally.

Delta opioid receptors: reflexive, defensive and vocal affective responses in female rats

Ultrasonic vocalizations may be an expression of the affective pain response in laboratory animals. The present experiment compares the effects of morphine to the delta agonist, DPDPE (D-Pen2,D-Pen5 enkephalin) on a range of reflexive, behavioral and affective responses during an aggressive interaction. In experiment 1, naive female Long-Evans rats received morphine (0, 1, 3, 6, 10 micrograms ICV), or DPDPE (0, 30, 60, 100 micrograms ICV). In experiment 2, female rats were treated with naltrindole (1.0 mg/kg IP) 20 min before DPDPE (0, 60, 100 micrograms ICV). The following endpoints were measured: (1) latency to tail flick in response to heat stimuli; (2) high (33-65 kHz) and low (20-32 kHz) frequency ultrasonic and audible vocalizations; (3) defensive behavior; and (4) motoric activity. Following a brief exposure to attack, rats were threatened by the aggressor but protected from further attack by a large, wire mesh cage, thereby allowing for continued behavioral and vocal measurement without the risk of physical injury; video and audio recordings were made during the attack and then during a portion of the protected encounter (2 min). Morphine suppressed pain reactions varying in complexity from a spinal reflex, to an organized escape reaction, to an affective vocal response. The delta agonist, DPDPE, attenuated high frequency ultrasonic calling and tail flick responding. Defensive behaviors were also modulated by DPDPE at doses that had no effect on walking or rearing, indicating behavioral specificity. By contrast, doses of morphine that decreased defensive upright and escape also decreased motor activity. In female rats, morphine and DPDPE share a common profile of effects on a range of functional end-points, but DPDPE appears to modulate more selectively the reactions related to aversiveness without exerting sedative effects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Non-NMDA receptor antagonist attenuates antinociception induced by morphine but not beta-endorphin, D-Pen2-D-Pen5-enkephalin, and U50, 488H administered intracerebroventricularly in mice

The antinociception induced by morphine but not beta-endorphin, D-Pen2-D-Pen5-enkephalin (DPDPE), or U50, 488H (trans-3,4-dichloro-N-methyl-N-[2-(1-pyrrolidinyl) cyclohexyl] benzeocetamide) administered intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) has been previously demonstrated to be mediated by the N-Methyl-D-Aspartic Acid (NMDA) receptor. The present study was designed to determine if non-NMDA receptors are involved in opioid-induced antinociception. Antinociception was assessed by the tail-flick test in male ICR mice. Various doses of CNQX (6-Cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione), a competitive non-NMDA receptor antagonist, (0.001 to 0.5 microgram) injected intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) alone did not show any antinociceptive effect. CNQX (0.01 to 1 micrograms, i.c.v.) dose-dependently attenuated the inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by morphine (1 microgram). However, inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by i.c.v. administered beta-endorphin (1 microgram), DPDPE (10 micrograms), or U50, 488H was not affected by i.c.v. administered CNQX. It is concluded that non-NMDA receptors are involved in i.c.v. morphine-induced antinociception. However, non-NMDA receptors are not involved in i.c.v. administered beta-endorphin-, DPDPE-, and U50, 488H-induced antinociception at the supraspinal level.

Involvement of different subtypes of cholecystokinin receptors in opioid antinociception in the mouse

Various doses of sulfated cholecystokinin octapeptide (CCK-8s) injected intracerebroventricularly (ICV) alone did not show any antinociceptive effect. CCK-8s (0.01-1 ng) pretreated ICV for 10 min dose-dependently attenuated the inhibition of the tail flick response induced by ICV-administered morphine (2 micrograms). beta-endorphin (1 microgram), and U50,488H (trans-3,4-dichloro-N-methyl-N-[2-(1-pyrrolidinyl) cyclohexyl]benzeocetamide), 60 micrograms). However, ICV pretreatment with CCK-8s was not effective in reducing the inhibition of the tail flick response induced by [D-Pen(2)-D-Pen5]enkephalin (DPDPE; 10 micrograms) administered ICV. To determine what subtype(s) of CCK receptors are involved in antagonizing the antinociception induced by these opioids, effect of lorglumide sodium salt (a CCKA receptor antagonist) or PD135,158 N-methyl-D-glucamine salt (a CCKB receptor antagonist) on opioid-induced inhibition of the tail flick response was examined. Various doses of lorglumide sodium salt (lorglumide) or PD135,158 N-methyl-D-glucamine salt (PD135,158) injected ICV alone did not affect the basal tail flick response. The antagonistic effect of CCK-8s on morphine-, beta-endorphin-, and U50,488H-induced inhibition of the tail flick response was blocked in a dose-dependent manner by the co-ICV injection of PD135,158 (0.001-0.1 ng). The co-ICV injection of lorglumide (0.001-0.1 ng) dose-dependently blocked the antagonistic effect of CCK-8s on beta-endorphin- and U50,488H-induced, but not morphine-induced, inhibition of the tail flick response. Our results suggest that both CCKA and CCKB receptors are involved in antagonizing antinociception induced by beta-endorphin and U50,488H administered supraspinally. However, only CCKB (but not CCKA) receptors are involved in antagonizing antinociception induced by morphine administered supraspinally. CCK receptors are not involved in antagonizing the supraspinally administered DPDPE-induced antinociception.

Multiplicative interaction between intrathecally and intracerebroventricularly administered morphine for antinociception in the mouse: involvement of supraspinal NMDA but not non-NMDA receptors

Concurrent administration of morphine to both supraspinal and spinal sites produced a multiplicative (synergistic) interaction for antinociception. The purpose of this study was to determine if supraspinal glutaminergic receptors are involved in the multiplicative interaction for antinociception induced by morphine. The antinociception was assessed by the tail-flick test. Effect of MK-801 [(+/-)-5-methyl-10, 11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo (a,d)cyclohepten-5,10-imine maleate], a non-competitive N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptor antagonist, or CNQX (6-Cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione), a competitive non-NMDA receptor antagonist on inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by a combined i.t. and i.c.v. administration of morphine was studied. Either i.t. or i.c.v. administration of morphine alone at the dose of 0.2 microgram slightly increased inhibition of the tail-flick response. However, concurrent i.t. and i.c.v. injections of morphine at the dose of 0.2 microgram increased the inhibition of the tail-flick response in a synergistic manner. Various doses of MK-801 (0.01-1 microgram) or CNQX (0.05-0.5 microgram) pretreated i.c.v. alone did not show any antinociceptive effect. MK-801 pretreated i.c.v. for 10 min dose-dependently attenuated the inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by concurrent i.t. and i.c.v. injections of morphine. However, CNQX pretreated i.c.v. for 10 min did not affect the inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by concurrent i.t. and i.c.v. injections of morphine. Our results suggest that supraspinal NMDA but not non-NMDA receptors are involved in mediating the antinociception produced by morphine-induced multiplicative interaction between spinal and supraspinal sites.

Effects of intraventricular injection of morphine and beta-endorphin on serotonin release from the spinal cord in rats

Effects of intraventricular (third ventricle) injection of morphine and beta-endorphin on the release of serotonin (5-HT; 5-hydroxytryptamine) and 5-HIAA (5-hydroxy indolacetic acid) from the spinal cord were studied using urethane anesthetized spinally perfused rats. Intraventricular injection of morphine (25 micrograms) increased the 5-HT level in the perfusate about threefold. The increase of 5-HT release reached at peak between 30 and 60 min after the first injection of morphine. However, the levels of 5-HIAA, a metabolite of 5-HT, was not significantly altered by intraventricular injection of morphine. Furthermore, second intraventricular injection of morphine at the same dose did not increase 5-HT level in the spinal perfusate. In contrast to the results with morphine, beta-endorphin (10 micrograms) administered intraventricularly did not alter the release of 5-HT and 5-HIAA from the spinal cord. In addition, acute antinociceptive tolerance to intraventricular morphine induced by a prior intraventricular injection of morphine was studied in pentobarbital anesthetized rats. Acute tolerance was induced by intraventricular pretreatment with morphine (20 micrograms) for 120 min and the same dose of morphine was injected intraventricularly. The tail-flick test was used as an antinociceptive test. Pretreatment of rats with morphine intraventricularly reduced inhibition of the tail-flick response to intraventricularly injected morphine. The results support our previous hypothesis that beta-endorphin and morphine administered supraspinally activate separate descending systems. Spinopetal serotonergic descending pathway is selectively activated by intraventricularly injected morphine but not beta-endorphin.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Differential antagonism by MK-801 against antinociception induced by opioid receptor agonists administered supraspinally in mice

Various doses of MK-801 ((+/-)-5-methyl-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo(a,d) cyclohepten-5, 10-imine maleate), a non-competitive N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptor antagonist (0.001-1 microgram) injected intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) alone did not show any antinociceptive effect. MK-801 (0.001-1 microgram i.c.v.) dose dependently attenuated the inhibition of the tail-flick and hot plate responses induced by i.c.v. administered morphine (1 microgram), [D-Pen2, D-Pen5]enkephalin (DPDPE; 10 micrograms), and U50,488H (trans-3,4-dichloro-N-methyl-N-[2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)cyclohexyl]benzeoce tamide ) 60 micrograms). However, the inhibition of the tail-flick and hot plate responses induced by i.c.v. administered beta-endorphin (1 microgram) was not changed by i.c.v. administered MK-801. Our results indicate that, at the supraspinal level, NMDA receptors are involved in the production of antinociception induced by supraspinally administered morphine, DPDPE, and U50,488H but not beta-endorphin.

Partial antinociceptive cross-tolerance to intracerebroventricular beta-endorphin in mice tolerant to systemic morphine

The effects of subcutaneous morphine pellet-implantation on antinociception induced by intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of beta-endorphin or morphine and intrathecal (i.t.) administration of morphine, [D-Pen2,D-Pen5]enkephalin (DPDPE), [D-Ala2,NMePhe4,Gly5-ol]enkephalin (DAMGO), serotonin or norepinephrine were studied in male ICR mice. The tail-flick and hot-plate responses were used for antinociceptive tests. The ED50 values for i.c.v. administered morphine for antinociception in morphine pellet-implanted mice were increased from 3.3- and 2.2-fold at 0 h to 14.2- and 19.0-fold at 4 h and declined to 4.8- and 3.0-fold at 8 h after pellet removal in the tail-flick and hot-plate tests, respectively. On the other hand, the ED50 values for i.c.v. administered beta-endorphin for antinociception were only slightly increased (1.7- to 5.1-fold increases) throughout the same time course. The inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by i.t. injection of morphine, DPDPE and serotonin, but not norepinephrine or DAMGO, was attenuated in morphine pellet-implanted mice. These findings are consistent with previous studies indicating that different neuronal mechanisms are involved in morphine- and beta-endorphin-induced antinociception.