Fluctuations of plasma lipoprotein-A concentrations during pregnancy and post partum

Lipoprotein(a) in children and adolescents with genetically confirmed familial hypercholesterolemia followed up at a specialized lipid clinic

Background and aim

Many children with an FH mutation also exhibit elevated lipoprotein(a) levels, which is an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Studies have reported higher levels of lipoprotein(a) in adult and middle-aged women than men. There is limited knowledge on the concentration and change of lipoprotein(a) levels in children with genetic FH, and therefore we investigated sex-differences in lipoprotein(a) level and change in lipoprotein(a) in girls and boys with genetically confirmed FH.

Methods

Medical records were reviewed retrospectively in 438 subjects with heterozygous FH that started follow-up below the age of 19 years at the Lipid Clinic, Oslo University Hospital in Norway, and of these we included 386 subjects with at least one Lp(a) measurement.

Results

Mean (SD) age at baseline was 13.8 (7.3) years and the age was similar between sexes. Girls had a higher lipoprotein(a) level than boys at baseline: median (25-75 percentile) 223 (108-487) vs. 154 (78-360) mg/L, respectively (p < 0.01). From baseline to follow-up measurement (mean [SD] 8.9 [6.1] years apart), the mean (95 % CI) absolute and percentage change in Lp(a) level in girls was 151.4 (54.9-247.8) mg/L and 44.8 (16.4-73.1) %, respectively, and in boys it was 66.8 (22.9-110.8) mg/L and 50.5 (8.8-92.3) %, respectively (both p > 0.05).

Conclusions

We found an increase in Lp(a) levels in children with genetic FH with age, and higher levels in girls than boys, which could impact risk assessment and future ASCVD. Further research is needed to elucidate whether subjects with FH could benefit from lipoprotein(a)-lowering therapies that are under current investigations.

Lp(a) - an overlooked risk factor

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is an increasingly discussed and studied risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and aortic valve stenosis. Many genetic and epidemiological studies support the important causal role that Lp(a) plays in the incidence of cardiovascular disease. Although dependent upon the threshold and unit of measurement of Lp(a), most estimates suggest between 20 and 30% of the world's population have elevated serum levels of Lp(a). Lp(a) levels are predominantly mediated by genetics and are not significantly modified by lifestyle interventions. Efforts are ongoing to develop effective pharmacotherapies to lower Lp(a) and to determine if lowering Lp(a) with these medications ultimately decreases the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events. In this review, the genetics and pathophysiological properties of Lp(a) will be discussed as well as the epidemiological data demonstrating its impact on the incidence of cardiovascular disease. Recommendations for screening and how to currently approach patients with elevated Lp(a) are also noted. Finally, the spectrum of pharmacotherapies under development for Lp(a) lowering is detailed.

Women, lipids, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a call to action from the European Atherosclerosis Society

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in women and men globally, with most due to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Despite progress during the last 30 years, ASCVD mortality is now increasing, with the fastest relative increase in middle-aged women. Missed or delayed diagnosis and undertreatment do not fully explain this burden of disease. Sex-specific factors, such as hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, premature menopause (especially primary ovarian insufficiency), and polycystic ovary syndrome are also relevant, with good evidence that these are associated with greater cardiovascular risk. This position statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society focuses on these factors, as well as sex-specific effects on lipids, including lipoprotein(a), over the life course in women which impact ASCVD risk. Women are also disproportionately impacted (in relative terms) by diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and auto-immune inflammatory disease. All these effects are compounded by sociocultural components related to gender. This panel stresses the need to identify and treat modifiable cardiovascular risk factors earlier in women, especially for those at risk due to sex-specific conditions, to reduce the unacceptably high burden of ASCVD in women.

Supporting evidence for lipoprotein(a) measurements in clinical practice

High levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] are causal for development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and highly regulated by genetics. Levels are higher in Blacks compared to Whites, and in women compared to men. Lp(a)'s main protein components are apolipoprotein (apo) (a) and apoB100, the latter being the main component of Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) particles. Studies have identified Lp(a) to be associated with inflammatory, coagulation and wound healing pathways. Lack of validated and accepted assays to measure Lp(a), risk cutoff values, guidelines for diagnosis, and targeted therapies have added challenges to the field. Scientific efforts are ongoing to address these, including studies evaluating the cardiovascular benefits of decreasing Lp(a) levels with targeted apo(a) lowering treatments. This review will provide a synopsis of evidence-based effects of high Lp(a) on disease presentation, highlight available guidelines and discuss promising therapies in development. We will conclude with current clinical information and future research needs in the field.

Lipoprotein(a) in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and aortic stenosis: a European Atherosclerosis Society consensus statement

This 2022 European Atherosclerosis Society lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] consensus statement updates evidence for the role of Lp(a) in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and aortic valve stenosis, provides clinical guidance for testing and treating elevated Lp(a) levels, and considers its inclusion in global risk estimation. Epidemiologic and genetic studies involving hundreds of thousands of individuals strongly support a causal and continuous association between Lp(a) concentration and cardiovascular outcomes in different ethnicities; elevated Lp(a) is a risk factor even at very low levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. High Lp(a) is associated with both microcalcification and macrocalcification of the aortic valve. Current findings do not support Lp(a) as a risk factor for venous thrombotic events and impaired fibrinolysis. Very low Lp(a) levels may associate with increased risk of diabetes mellitus meriting further study. Lp(a) has pro-inflammatory and pro-atherosclerotic properties, which may partly relate to the oxidized phospholipids carried by Lp(a). This panel recommends testing Lp(a) concentration at least once in adults; cascade testing has potential value in familial hypercholesterolaemia, or with family or personal history of (very) high Lp(a) or premature ASCVD. Without specific Lp(a)-lowering therapies, early intensive risk factor management is recommended, targeted according to global cardiovascular risk and Lp(a) level. Lipoprotein apheresis is an option for very high Lp(a) with progressive cardiovascular disease despite optimal management of risk factors. In conclusion, this statement reinforces evidence for Lp(a) as a causal risk factor for cardiovascular outcomes. Trials of specific Lp(a)-lowering treatments are critical to confirm clinical benefit for cardiovascular disease and aortic valve stenosis.

Management of Hypercholesterolemia in Pregnant Women with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review, we discuss strategies for managing dyslipidemia in pregnant women with ASCVD.

RECENT FINDINGS

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality in women as well as the leading cause of pregnancy-related mortality in the USA. It is paramount to screen, identify, counsel, and treat women of childbearing age who have existing atherosclerotic disease to mitigate the risks of complications and mortality. Dyslipidemias, including hypercholesterolemia and hyperlipidemia, can further enhance the risk for future CVD events. Treating hypercholesterolemia during pregnancy is crucial, and this is an opportune time for cross-collaboration of subspecialties in cardiology, obstetrics, and gynecology.

Lipoprotein(a) the Insurgent: A New Insight into the Structure, Function, Metabolism, Pathogenicity, and Medications Affecting Lipoprotein(a) Molecule

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], aka "Lp little a", was discovered in the 1960s in the lab of the Norwegian physician Kåre Berg. Since then, we have greatly improved our knowledge of lipids and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Lp(a) is an enigmatic class of lipoprotein that is exclusively formed in the liver and comprises two main components, a single copy of apolipoprotein (apo) B-100 (apo-B100) tethered to a single copy of a protein denoted as apolipoprotein(a) apo(a). Plasma levels of Lp(a) increase soon after birth to a steady concentration within a few months of life. In adults, Lp(a) levels range widely from <2 to 2500 mg/L. Evidence that elevated Lp(a) levels >300 mg/L contribute to CVD is significant. The improvement of isoform-independent assays, together with the insight from epidemiologic studies, meta-analyses, genome-wide association studies, and Mendelian randomization studies, has established Lp(a) as the single most common independent genetically inherited causal risk factor for CVD. This breakthrough elevated Lp(a) from a biomarker of atherosclerotic risk to a target of therapy. With the emergence of promising second-generation antisense therapy, we hope that we can answer the question of whether Lp(a) is ready for prime-time clinic use. In this review, we present an update on the metabolism, pathophysiology, and current/future medical interventions for high levels of Lp(a).

Lipoprotein (a): impact by ethnicity and environmental and medical conditions

Levels of lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)], a complex between an LDL-like lipid moiety containing one copy of apoB, and apo(a), a plasminogen-derived carbohydrate-rich hydrophilic protein, are primarily genetically regulated. Although stable intra-individually, Lp(a) levels have a skewed distribution inter-individually and are strongly impacted by a size polymorphism of the LPA gene, resulting in a variable number of kringle IV (KIV) units, a key motif of apo(a). The variation in KIV units is a strong predictor of plasma Lp(a) levels resulting in stable plasma levels across the lifespan. Studies have demonstrated pronounced differences across ethnicities with regard to Lp(a) levels and some of this difference, but not all of it, can be explained by genetic variations across ethnic groups. Increasing evidence suggests that age, sex, and hormonal impact may have a modest modulatory influence on Lp(a) levels. Among clinical conditions, Lp(a) levels are reported to be affected by kidney and liver diseases.

Severe dyslipidemia in pregnancy: The role of therapeutic apheresis

During pregnancy physiological changes occur in the lipid metabolism due to changing hormonal conditions: the LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), triglycerides (TG) and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] increase throughout pregnancy. Common lipoprotein disorders are associated in pregnancy with two major clinical disorders: severe hypertriglyceridemia (SHTG) is a potent risk factor for development of acute pancreatitis and elevated cholesterol due to greater concentrations of LDL and remnant lipoproteins and reduced levels of HDL promote atherosclerosis. The combination of homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) and pregnancy can be a fatal condition. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) may be used for an urgent need of a fast and effective lowering of TG levels in order to prevent a severe pancreatitis episode or hypertriglyceridemia-induced complications during pregnancy. LDL apheresis can decrease LDL-C and prevent complications and can be considered in the treatment of pregnancies complicated by high LDL-C. These conditions are configured in patients with HeFH who were taking statins before pregnancy (selected cases), patients already receiving apheresis before pregnancy suffering from HoFH, patients suffering from hypertriglyceridemia due to familial hyperlipoproteinemia types I and V, and cases of hypertriglyceridemia secondary to diabetes.

Dyslipidemia in women: etiology and management

Dyslipidemia is highly prevalent among women. The management of dyslipidemia is a cornerstone in the prevention of both primary and secondary cardiovascular events, such as myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and coronary death. All major international guidelines on the treatment of dyslipidemia recommend similar approaches to the management of dyslipidemia in both men and women. Estrogen replacement therapy should not be considered as a therapeutic option for managing dyslipidemia in women. The reduction of atherogenic lipoprotein burden (reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol based on risk-stratified thresholds and treatment targets) provided the framework for managing dyslipidemia in the US, Europe, Canada, and elsewhere in the world. Very recently, new guidelines in the US have changed this paradigm, whereby rather than focusing on treatment targets, risk now defines the intensity of treatment with statin therapy, with no specific goals for what level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol should be attained. It is not clear if this will lead to changes in lipid guidelines in other parts of the world. In the meantime, region-specific guidelines should be followed. Lipid lowering with statin therapy does correlate with reductions in cardiovascular event rates in women. The clinical impact of treating dyslipidemias in women with nonstatin drugs (eg, fibrates, nicotinic acid, bile acid-binding resins, omega-3 fish oils) is as yet not determined.

The current status of lipoprotein (a) in pregnancy: a literature review

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Lipoprotein (Lp) (a) is a neglected element of the blood lipid profile. It is now recognized as a determinant of coronary heart disease progression and its role in atherosclerosis and its ability to induce thrombosis make it potentially important in the course of normal and complicated pregnancies. Pregnancy involves a major transformation of metabolism to sustain fetal growth. Multiple studies have been conducted on Lp(a) in pregnancy, and it is timely to synthesize and evaluate this evidence.

METHODS AND SUBJECTS

We reviewed the MEDLINE database for all articles published concerning "lipoprotein a" and "pregnancy" from May 2003 to May 2012. A previous comprehensive review assessed the literature up to May 2003.

RESULTS

We critically analyzed 14 studies detailing the effect of complications in pregnancy on Lp(a) profile, and subsequent pregnancy outcomes where available. Studies evaluating the normal metabolic response to pregnancy, pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia and intra-uterine growth restriction were reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial mass of data has accumulated describing Lp(a) changes in pregnancy. The diversity of study design limits the ability to draw broad-ranging conclusions, but brings into focus the important questions remaining, which we discuss.

Changes of plasma lipoprotein(a) during and after normal pregnancy in Caucasians

OBJECTIVE

Elevated plasma concentrations of lipoprotein(a) are associated with an increased risk for development of atherosclerosis. High lipoprotein(a) concentrations may also be associated with pregnancy-induced hypertension and pre-eclampsia, but reference data on the course of lipoprotein(a) during uneventful pregnancies are limited and questionable.

METHODS

We studied plasma lipoprotein(a) concentrations in 19 healthy nulliparous Caucasian women during and after uncomplicated pregnancy. Blood was sampled every 4 weeks during pregnancy from 9 weeks onwards, during labor and at 2-4 weeks and 3-5 months after delivery. An apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) isoform-independent enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to measure lipoprotein(a). Multilevel analysis was used to describe the data.

RESULTS

Lipoprotein(a) increased until 35 weeks, subsequently decreased slightly until delivery, and fell to values below early pregnancy concentrations thereafter. The curve is defined by the formula lipoprotein(a) (mg/l) = exp [4.789 + (0.05215 x GA) + (-0.0007371 x GA2)] where GA = gestational age in weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

We constructed a curve for plasma lipoprotein(a) which may serve as the standard reference for changes in pregnancy. Its formula is helpful in predicting changes of gestational age-dependent changes of lipoprotein(a) in normal pregnancy.

Lipoprotein (a) in pregnancy: a critical review of the literature

In this article the literature on lipoprotein (a) during normal pregnancy and pregnancy complicated by preeclampsia or intrauterine growth restriction is reviewed. MEDLINE, from January 1966 to May 2003, was searched to locate relevant articles in English. Additional publications were identified by reviewing references in selected articles. Studies were reviewed by predefined and strict criteria. It appeared that methodology and results of studies on lipoprotein (a) during normal and complicated pregnancy were very diverse. Lipoprotein (a) increased with advancing gestation or remained unaltered during normal pregnancy. Women with preeclampsia had higher, unaltered or lower lipoprotein (a) concentrations as compared to normal pregnant controls. Only few studies were in agreement with most of the review criteria. In conclusion, published studies on lipoprotein (a) in pregnancy differ substantially in the used methods to measure lipoprotein (a), sample size, study design and ethnicity of the study population. Therefore, these studies yielded conflicting results and no unequivocal view on the role of lipoprotein (a) in normal and complicated pregnancy. Recommendations for future studies are amongst others: the use of an apo(a) independent method for measuring Lp(a), inclusion of sufficient numbers of patients, the use of a longitudinal study design when the objective is to study the changes of Lp(a) during pregnancy and selection of a study population that is ethnically representative for the general population.

Correlation between lipoprotein(a) and other risk factors for cardiovascular disease and diabetes in Cherokee Indians: the Cherokee Diabetes Study

PURPOSE

To study the age and gender effects on the distribution of lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] and its relationship with other cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes risk factors in the participants of the Cherokee Diabetes Study (CDS) (1995-2000).

METHODS

The CDS is a population based cross-sectional study of diabetes and its risk factors in Cherokee Indians aged 5 to 40 years of Oklahoma. Lp(a) levels were measured in 2205 participants.

RESULTS

The median Lp(a) (mg/dL) levels in the females were not significantly different among four age groups (5-9, 10-19, 20-29, and 30-40 years). However, the 20- to 29-year-old males had significantly lower Lp(a) levels than the males 10 to 19 and 30 to 40 years old. Females had significantly higher Lp(a) levels than males in the 20- to 29-year-old age group only. In the 5- to 19-year-old children/adolescents, Lp(a) levels were significantly negatively correlated with the degree of Indian heritage (DIH) and positively correlated with total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoproteins (LDL), and apolipoprotein B (apoB) in girls, but not in boys. In the young adults aged 20 to 29 years, Lp(a) levels were significantly correlated with DIH, body mass index (BMI), waist-hip ratio (WHR), percentage of body fat (PBF), systolic blood pressure (SBP), triglycerides (TG), 2-hour plasma glucose (2hPG), and insulin in males, and DIH, PBF, TC, LDL, TG, and insulin in females. In adults aged 30 to 40 years, Lp(a) levels were significantly correlated with DIH, TG, and LDL in females, and DIH and insulin in males.

CONCLUSION

In the girls, Lp(a) levels appear to be associated with several CVD and diabetes risk factors at an early age (5-19 years), while in the boys, the association occurs at older ages (> 19 years). There are significant age and gender differences regarding the distribution of Lp(a) and its correlates in the 5 to 9, 10 to 19, and 20 to 29-year-old age groups, but the differences tend to be weaker in the 30- to 40-year-old age group. For the same age and gender groups, Lp(a) concentrations in Cherokee Indians were much lower than those reported in blacks and slightly lower than those in whites. In Cherokee Indians, the Lp(a) levels were consistently and positively correlated with LDL, and negatively correlated with DIH, TG, and insulin.

The role of lipoprotein (a) in pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia

Endothelial cell dysfunction is a key feature of the pathogenesis of pre-eclampsia. The cause of the endothelial cell injury is probably multifactorial, but poor placenta perfusion plays a major role. In pre-eclampsia, characteristic pathological lesions in the placenta are fibrin deposits, acute atherosis and thrombosis. The similarity between the lesions of pre-eclampsia and atherosclerosis has led to speculations of a common pathophysiological pathway. An abnormal lipid profile is known to be strongly associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and has a direct effect on endothelial function. Abnormal lipid metabolism seems important in the pathogenesis of pre-eclampsia too. An elevated plasma lipoprotein (a) concentration is a known risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. In this paper, we discuss three hypotheses about the mechanisms by which lipoprotein (a) may be associated with pre-eclampsia: 1. Lp(a), as an acute-phase reactant, transporting cholesterol to sites of endothelial damage for reparation, temporarily increases during pregnancy and increases more during a pregnancy complicated by mild to moderate pre-eclampsia as compared to an uncomplicated pregnancy, in response to a greater extend of endothelial injury in pre-eclampsia. After delivery, pre-eclampsia subsides and Lp(a) concentrations return to baseline levels. 2. In cases of severe pre-eclampsia, there is even more extensive endothelial damage and consequently a higher consumption of Lp(a) in reparation of this vascular damage. These women will have lower concentrations of Lp(a). 3. High baseline concentrations of Lp(a), which are genetically determined, may induce or contribute to the development of pre-eclampsia by promoting endothelial dysfunction. In this line of reasoning one would expect to find higher concentrations of Lp(a) in women at risk for developing pre-eclampsia in a future pregnancy or with a history of pre-eclampsia. As discussed above, these women are also at increased risk for future cardiovascular disease as compared to women with a history of normal pregnancy. The pathophysiologic changes associated with cardiovascular disease may also be responsible for the increased incidence of pre-eclampsia in these women.

Differential indication of lipoprotein apheresis during pregnancy

Lipoprotein apheresis is an effective treatment for severe disorders of lipid metabolism. It is the only life prolonging therapy for patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Changes of lipid metabolism during pregnancy related to changes of hormone concentrations do not cause clinical complications in the majority of cases. However, in particular clinical situations there is the need to offer a therapeutic option. Increasing morbidity and mortality of mother and child due to severe disorders of lipid metabolism have to be prevented. In general, lipid lowering drugs are contraindicated during pregnancy. Therefore, lipoprotein apheresis offers an alternative, which could be used in select cases to treat acute or chronic hyperlipoproteinemia associated with pregnancy. This article summarizes experiences with patients, who became pregnant during chronic lipoprotein apheresis, or who were treated by lipoprotein apheresis because of acute disorders of lipid metabolism during pregnancy. In conclusion, after individual risk benefit analysis for mother and child lipoprotein apheresis can be safely performed during pregnancy.

The elevated plasma lipoprotein(a) concentrations in preeclampsia do not precede the development of the disorder

We sought to determine whether maternal plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels are elevated in the second trimester, before the development of preeclampsia and other obstetrical complications, in women at risk. In the first part of the study (cross-sectional), plasma concentrations of Lp(a) were compared among 16 women with preeclampsia, 35 normotensive pregnant women and 18 healthy nonpregnant women. In the second part (nested case-control), blood samples were collected prospectively from 82 women at risk of preeclampsia, at 14-24 weeks of gestation, and Lp(a) levels were compared between those in whom preeclampsia or other obstetrical complications developed and those in whom they did not. In the cross-sectional study, plasma concentrations of Lp(a) were significantly higher in women with preeclampsia than in normotensive pregnant and healthy nonpregnant women (41 +/- 31 vs. 24 +/- 16 and 15 +/- 10 mg/dl, respectively; P=.001). Of the 82 women in the second part of the study, 9 (11%) developed preeclampsia and 19 (23%) had complications such as intrauterine growth restriction, preterm delivery and fetal or neonatal loss. There were no differences in plasma Lp(a) concentrations between the women with preeclampsia and those without complications, though Lp(a) levels were significantly higher in women with other complications than in those with either preeclampsia or uncomplicated pregnancies (40 +/- 29 vs. 17 +/- 13 or 28 +/- 18 mg/dl, respectively; P=.05). In conclusion, elevated plasma levels of Lp(a), associated with clinically established preeclampsia, are not detected before the appearance of the disorder in pregnant women at risk.

Lipoprotein(a) changes during natural menstrual cycle and ovarian stimulation with recombinant and highly purified urinary FSH

This prospective, randomized, controlled study compared the effects of recombinant human FSH (r-hFSH) and highly purified urinary FSH (u-hFSH HP) on lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentrations in women undergoing ovarian stimulation. Fifty infertile women were randomly allocated into two equally sized treatment groups (n = 25 per group). Thirty normal ovulation women were recruited as controls. The infertile women received u-hFSH or r-hFSH 150 IU/day starting on cycle day 2. From cycle day 6 the dose was adjusted according to ovarian response. Human chorionic gonadotrophin 10,000 IU was administered once there was at least one follicle > or =18 mm in diameter. The luteal phase was supported with progesterone 50 mg/day for at least 15 days. Repeated measurements of Lp(a) concentrations were performed during both stimulated and natural cycles. A significant increase in luteal phase Lp(a) concentrations was detected in the stimulated cycles, whereas no significant changes in serum Lp(a) concentrations were observed during natural cycles. There were no significant differences between the urinary and recombinant FSH effects on serum Lp(a). The luteal Lp(a) increase was transitory because after 1 month Lp(a) concentrations returned to baseline values if pregnancy failed to occur; in pregnant women persistent increased Lp(a) concentrations were found at the 8th week. The percentage changes in serum Lp(a) were positively correlated with the luteal progesterone increase (r = 0.40, P < 0.05), but not with follicular or luteal oestradiol increase. The women with low baseline Lp(a) (< or =5 mg/dl) had a greater increase of the Lp(a) concentrations at midluteal phase than women with baseline Lp(a) >5 mg/dl. In conclusion, the recombinant or urinary hFSH administration does not directly influence Lp(a) concentrations. The luteal Lp(a) increase in stimulated cycles is not related to gonadotrophin treatment per se, but appears to be related to the high luteal progesterone concentrations, physiologically or pharmacologically determined. Our results also suggest that the sensitivity to the progesterone changes could be related to apolipoprotein(a) phenotype.

Lipoprotein (a) levels in normal pregnancy and in pregnancy complicated with pre-eclampsia

Lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) is recognised as a risk factor for arterial and venous thrombosis, a property which may relate to its structural similarity to plasminogen. Pregnancy is associated with a hypofibrinolytic state. Elevated Lp(a) may influence fibrinolysis and have an unfavourable role in pregnancy outcome. In this study alterations in plasma Lp(a) concentrations during normal pregnancy was examined, in a detailed longitudinal investigation, in ten women together with changes in other lipid parameters. In addition, Lp(a) concentrations were examined in subjects with pre-eclampsia (n=10) relative to matched controls (n=10), since it has recently been reported that a substantial increase in circulating Lp(a) occurs in this disorder. Lp(a) concentration increased steadily in normal pregnancy between 10 and 35 weeks with a doubling of the median value from 14.5 to 27.0 mg/dl (P=0.01). A significant increase in Lp(a) values was observed in all subjects with increasing gestation (median rise 190%, range 117-340%). This increase was intermediate to those seen in plasma triglyceride and cholesterol. No significant difference in Lp(a) values was observed in subjects with pre-eclampsia, compared with matched normal pregnancy controls (median 14 mg/dl [IQR 4.7-69.0] in pre-eclampsia vs 20 mg/dl [9.0-56. 3] in controls; P=0.57), at a median gestation of 32 weeks. In conclusion, there is a 2-fold increase in Lp(a) during normal pregnancy, which may influence fibrinolysis. Circulating Lp(a) is not significantly elevated in women with pre-eclampsia, and thus is unlikely to play a role in the pathophysiology of this disorder.

Distribution of apolipoprotein(a) isoforms in normotensive and severe preeclamptic women

OBJECTIVE

Preeclampsia is a pregnancy-related disorder constituting one of the primary causes of worldwide maternal and fetal mortality, but despite intensive research its pathogenesis remains unclear. Lipids have been implicated in the development of preeclampsia, although this possible association remains controversial and not yet fully investigated. This study set out to examine the potential association between lipoprotein(a) and the development of severe preeclampsia. The focus of this study was to investigate the potential utility of apolipoprotein(a) isoforms as possible diagnostic markers for identifying women at risk for developing preeclampsia.

METHODS

Study participants included a control group of nonpregnant female volunteers (n = 59), a group of healthy pregnant (normotensive) female volunteers (n = 51), and a group of severe preeclamptic female volunteers (n = 59). Serum lipoprotein(a) concentrations were measured using double-antibody ELISA methods and were found to be 17.0+/-23.6 mg/dl among nonpregnant controls (n = 51), 15.9+/-15.8 mg/dl among healthy pregnant normotensives (n = 51), and 16.2+/-16.7 mg/dl in the preeclamptic group (n = 59). In addition, apolipoprotein (a) isoforms were identified using high-resolution SDS-agarose electrophoresis followed by immunoblotting.

RESULTS

We detected no significant differences between the groups studied in the distribution of isoforms (Chi-square = 1.21, df = 4, P = 0.89); however, in a 1-week interval we detected a 42.2% rise in Lp(a) levels as well as a 67.1% rise in C-reactive protein concentrations among 10 volunteers in the preeclamptic group (median = 9.6; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the exact mechanism of pathogenesis continues to elude investigators, our results suggest that lipoprotein(a) may act as an acute-phase reactant during preeclampsia. Although our results are preliminary, they are consistent with growing evidence implicating lipids as among those factors involved in the etiology of preeclampsia. Changes in apolipoprotein(a) may be among those important biochemical markers that are found to be useful in the early identification of high-risk women and warrant further study.

Correlates of lipoprotein(a) levels in a biracial cohort of young girls: the NHLBI Growth and Health Study

Elevated levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] are associated with increased risk for coronary heart disease (CHD). However, racial differences in both Lp(a) levels and their associated CHD risk are observed, with African Americans having, on average, higher Lp(a) levels than US whites but not the expected increase in CHD risk. We determined Lp(a) levels and their correlates in a large cohort (n = 2379) of black and white girls, ages 9 to 10 years, at the baseline visit of a longitudinal study of obesity development, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Growth and Health Study. Lp(a) levels were available for 1269 girls. The median Lp(a) level in black girls was over 3-fold higher than that in white girls. Associations were examined between Lp(a) levels and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, triglycerides, adiposity, pubertal maturation stage, body fat patterning (triceps/truncal skinfold ratio), and dietary fat (Keys' score). In black girls multiple regression analysis identified LDL-C (P <.001) and adiposity (P =. 08) as predictors of Lp(a) levels. In white girls only LDL-C (P =. 02) was associated with Lp(a). In conclusion, the level of Lp(a) was significantly higher in black girls. Our study also revealed a racial difference in correlates of Lp(a), such as LDL-C and adiposity. Whether this racial difference is due to an underlying biologic difference or is merely a reflection of a greater statistical power to detect a relationship with the level, which was 2.5-fold higher in black girls than in white girls, needs further investigation.

Long-term variability of serum lipoprotein(a) concentrations in healthy fertile women

Lipoprotein(a) is a unique lipoprotein with atherothrombogenic properties. Although its blood concentration is mainly genetically determined, various factors exist which may cause variability. These may influence the clinical use of the results. We studied lipoprotein(a) biological variation by a rate nephelometric assay over a period of two years in a population of healthy fertile women. The study was performed in 12 volunteers, healthy subjects with various lipoprotein(a) concentrations, by monthly determinations during one year and a single determination one year later, together with measurements of total, high density lipoprotein and high density lipoprotein2 cholesterol, triglycerides and apolipoproteins A1 and B. The intra-individual variability of lipoprotein(a) ranged between 4 to 20%, with three subjects showing a coefficient of biological variation higher than 15%. In absolute terms, the difference between two determinations could represent 0.44 g/l or 50% of the mean value. This study suggests that physiological lipoprotein(a) variations should be taken into account for clinical purposes, especially in patients in need of thorough risk evaluation.

Effects of physical activity and diet on lipoprotein(a)

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] represents a class of lipoproteins with some structural similarity to low density lipoprotein (LDL), but containing a unique apoprotein, apoprotein(a). First reported in 1963, Lp(a) is now considered to have an independent role in the development of atherosclerotic lesions. The level of Lp(a) in the blood is under strong genetic influence and does not appear to be alterable by lifestyle factors known to influence other lipoproteins. Regular moderate exercise has been shown to favorably alter other lipoproteins, and recent attention has focused on whether Lp(a) level can be influenced by physical activity. Current data from cross-sectional and intervention studies show little effect of moderate exercise on serum Lp(a) concentration. One possible exception may be an elevation of serum Lp(a) concentration in adult endurance and power athletes who exercise intensely on a daily basis. However, not all studies have taken into account possible racial or ethnic differences in Lp(a) concentrations and the skewed distribution observed within most populations. Standard dietary intervention such as a low fat diet recommended for weight loss and control of other blood lipids has little effect on serum Lp(a) level. At present, serum Lp(a) concentration does not appear to be significantly altered by realistic dietary changes and moderate physical activity as recommended for health. The synergistic effect on cardiovascular disease risk when both LDL-cholesterol and Lp(a) are elevated highlight the importance of attending to those risk factors that can be modified by exercise and other lifestyle changes.

Lipoprotein (a) concentrations in patients with various dyslipidaemias

Although the genetic background is the most important determinant of lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) concentration other factors, such as coexistent dyslipidaemia, could modify its levels. We undertook the present study to examine the serum Lp(a) concentration in various dyslipidaemias and to reveal any correlation of serum Lp(a) concentration with the other lipid parameters in a large group of dyslipidaemic Greek patients. A total of 242 patients followed as outpatients in our lipid clinic were studied. The patients were stratified into four main groups. Patients with cholesterol levels greater than 5.17 mmol/L but normal triglycerides were regarded as hypercholesterolaemic (n=85), patients with triglycerides greater than 2.25 mmol/L but normal cholesterol levels as hypertriglyceridaemic (n=51), patients with both increased cholesterol and triglyceride levels as having mixed hyperlipidaemia (n=62), and finally patients with decreased (<0.90 mmol/L) high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol but normal cholesterol and triglyceride levels as having primary hypoalphalipoproteinaemia (n=44). Hypercholesterolaemic patients exhibited the highest serum Lp(a) levels, while hypertriglyceridaemic patients exhibited the lowest. Patients with mixed hyperlipidaemia had intermediate serum Lp(a) concentration, which was significantly higher than that of hypertriglyceridaemic patients but significantly lower than that of hypercholesterolaemic patients. Interestingly, patients with low serum HDL-cholesterol levels presented with low serum Lp(a) concentration similar to that of hypertriglyceridaemic patients. In hypercholesterolaemic patients no correlation was found between serum total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol nor apolipoprotein B (apoB) levels and Lp(a) concentration. On the contrary, in hypertriglyceridaemic patients an inverse correlation was observed between serum triglycerides and Lp(a) concentration. After dividing the hypertriglyceridaemic patients into one group with elevated (>1.3 g/L) serum apoB levels (n=32) and another group with normal apoB levels (n=19), we found that the median serum Lp(a) concentration was three times higher in hyperapoB patients compared to patients with normal apoB levels. We conclude that serum Lp(a) levels are different in various types of primary hyperlipidaemia and are modulated according to the type of lipid elevation.

Lipoprotein (a) distribution in a Nigerian population

OBJECTIVES

To determine the distribution and determinants of lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) concentration among Nigerians.

METHODS

Subjects were recruited from civil servants living in Benin City, Nigeria. The height and weight of the individuals were measured and their use of alcohol and tobacco estimated by questionnaire. Laboratory analyses of blood samples involved Lp(a), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein (HDLc), HDL2c, HDL3c, triglyceride (TG) and insulin.

RESULTS

The analyses indicate that the Lp(a) concentrations are elevated among Nigerian populations and more skewed towards high levels than is observed for caucasian and oriental groups. The median levels for Lp(a) were 24.0 mg dl-1 and 19.0 mg dl-1 for women and men, respectively. This difference was significant (P < 0.05) but after stratifying by age, only the 45-54 year-old group of women (30.1 mg dl-1) had significantly higher (p < 0.001) median concentrations of Lp(a) than men (18.4 mg dl-1). Age, 20-64, had no influence on Lp(a) levels in men but in women Lp(a) concentrations increased significantly with age (p < 0.05). Among males alcohol consumption, smoking and body mass index (BMI) were not related to Lp(a) concentrations but a significant effect (p < 0.05) was noted for waist-hip ratio (WHR). Among females no relationship was observed between Lp(a) levels and alcohol consumption, BMI and WHR. All serum lipids measured (TC, HDLc, HDL2c, HDL3c, low-density lipoprotein (LDLc), and TG) were correlated with Lp(a) concentrations among men. A significant association with TC and LDLc remained after correcting for Lp(a) cholesterol. Among women, the Lp(a) levels were associated with TC, HDLc, HDL3c, and LDLc but not with HDL2c, and TG. The correlations with TC and LDLc were not significant after correcting for Lp(a) cholesterol. Insulin did not correlate with Lp(a) levels in either men or women.

CONCLUSIONS

Lp(a) concentrations are high in Nigerians, particularly among women, and the association between the Lp(a) concentrations and other lipoproteins is stronger than in white populations.

Do gonadotropins influence serum lipoprotein(a) concentrations? Observations on children, adolescents and adults

Data from 7045 subjects were examined. The main groups consisted of the following in- and outpatients: 1414 neonates, 2554 children and adolescents (1336 males, 1218 females), 1209 women directly postpartum, 786 non-pregnant women and 1090 men aged between 18 and 100 years of age. Unless otherwise stated, persons were under medical observation or therapy. The results were obtained over a three-year period using an in-house immunoluminometric assay specific for apolipoprotein(a) using two polyclonal antibodies and single lot of reagents to allow for comparability of results. Girls aged between 10 and 12 years of age had significantly higher serum lipoprotein(a) (median 124 mg/l) levels than boys (median 88 mg/l) of the same age (p < 0.05-Mann-Whitney U-test). Post-pubertal lipoprotein(a) concentrations were not significantly different from pre-pubertal levels. Between the ages of 0-9 and 13-17 years there were no statistically significant sex-linked differences in serum lipoprotein(a). In adults, lipoprotein(a) serum levels were significantly higher in women (median 163 mg/l) aged between 50 and 59 years, when compared with men (median 128 mg/l) of the same age group (p = 0.05-Kruskal-Wallis one way ANOVA followed by the Nemenyi test). There was no significant difference in serum lipoprotein(a) concentrations between healthy women (median 91 mg/l), women direct postpartum (median 116 mg/l) and in-patient women (median 117 mg/l) aged between 18 and 41 years of age (p = 0.11-0.96). There was no correlation between maternal lipoprotein(a) and birth weight in mature newborns (r = -0.028-0.085). The results may indicate a direct influence of gonadotropins at puberty and during the menopause which cause an increase in serum lipoprotein(a) concentrations.

Two weeks of daily injections and continuous infusion of recombinant human growth hormone (GH) in GH-deficient adults. II. Effects on serum lipoproteins and lipoprotein and hepatic lipase activity

Recombinant human growth hormone (GH) administered as daily subcutaneous (SC) injections has been shown to affect serum lipoproteins in GH-deficient subjects. However, the effects of continuous infusion of GH on serum lipoproteins have not been investigated in GH-deficient adults. The aim of the present study was to compare effects of daily injections and continuous infusion of GH on lipoprotein metabolism. Recombinant human GH (0.25 U/kg/wk) was administered to nine GH-deficient adult men during a period of 14 days in two different ways, ie, as a daily SC injection at 8:00 PM and as a continuous SC infusion, with 1 month of washout between the treatments. Blood samples and tests were performed in the morning after an overnight fast before the start of GH treatment (day 0) and on day 2 and day 14 of treatment. Abdominal SC adipose tissue lipoprotein lipase (LPL), postheparin plasma LPL, and hepatic lipase (HL) activity were measured 120 minutes after the intake of 100 g glucose. Adipose tissue LPL activity decreased and postheparin plasma HL activity increased after 14 days of GH treatment irrespective of the mode of GH administration, whereas GH treatment had no effect on postheparin plasma LPL activity. Serum triglyceride and very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) triglyceride concentrations increased during GH treatment. However, VLDL triglyceride concentrations increased to a greater degree during treatment with daily GH injections than during continuous infusion of GH. Serum apolipoprotein (apo) B and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentrations decreased during treatment with daily GH injections, but were not significantly affected by continuous GH infusion. Thus, apo B and LDL cholesterol concentrations were lower after daily GH injections versus continuous GH infusion. Serum lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and apo E concentrations increased during both modes of GH treatment. However, continuous infusion of GH resulted in a more marked increase in Lp(a) and apo E concentrations than daily GH injections. Minor effects were observed on serum apo A-I concentrations but high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol concentrations were not affected. In conclusion, GH treatment of GH-deficient men influenced adipose tissue LPL and postheparin plasma HL activity, as well as serum lipoprotein concentrations. Moreover, continuous GH infusion and daily GH injections differed with respect to the magnitude of effects on several lipoprotein fractions including VLDL triglycerides, LDL cholesterol, apo B, apo E, and Lp(a) concentrations.

Lipoprotein(a) in renal disease

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a genetically determined risk factor for atherosclerotic vascular disease. Several studies have described a correlation between high Lp(a) plasma levels and coronary heart disease, stroke, and peripheral atherosclerosis. In healthy individuals Lp(a) plasma concentrations are almost exclusively controlled by the apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] gene locus on chromosome 6q2.6-q2.7. More than 30 alleles at this highly polymorphic gene locus determine a size polymorphism of apo(a). There exists an inverse correlation between the size (molecular weight) of apo(a) isoforms and Lp(a) plasma concentrations. Average Lp(a) levels are high in individuals with low molecular weight isoforms and low in those with high molecular weight isoforms. Mean Lp(a) plasma levels are elevated over controls in patients with renal disease. Patients with nephrotic syndrome exhibit excessively high Lp(a) plasma concentrations, which can be reduced with antiproteinuric treatment. The mechanism underlying this elevation is unclear, but the general increase in protein synthesis caused by the liver due to high urinary protein loss is a likely explanation. Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) also have elevated Lp(a) levels. These are even higher in patients treated by continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis than in those receiving hemodialysis. Lipoprotein(a) concentrations decrease to values observed in controls matched for apo(a) type following renal transplantation. This clearly demonstrates the nongenetic origin of Lp(a) elevation in ESRD. Both the increase in ESRD and the decrease following renal transplantation are apo(a) phenotype dependent. Only patients with high molecular weight phenotypes show the described changes in Lp(a) levels. In patients with low molecular weight types the Lp(a) concentrations remain unchanged during both phases of renal disease. As in the general population, Lp(a) is a risk factor for cardiovascular events in ESRD patients. In this patient group the apo(a) phenotype seems to be equally or better predictive of the degree of atherosclerosis than is Lp(a) concentration. Further prospective studies will be necessary to confirm these observations. Whether Lp(a) also plays a key role in the pathogenesis and progression of renal diseases needs further study. Controversial data on the role of the kidney in Lp(a) metabolism result from insufficient sample sizes of several studies. Due to the broad range and skewed distribution of Lp(a) plasma concentrations, large study groups must be investigated to obtain reliable results.

Cyclical variation of plasma lipids, apolipoproteins, and lipoprotein(a) during menstrual cycle of normal women

We report herein the effects of cyclical variations of endogenous sex steroids during the menstrual cycle on plasma lipids and apolipoproteins (apo) in normal women. We examined 16 normal women (age range 25-36 yr) with normal menstrual cycles of 28-31 days. The study covered the period from the 1st day of a menstrual phase (basal) until the 1st day of the following menstrual phase. During the study all women maintained a normolipidic diet (30% fat). Plasma total cholesterol and low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol were significantly higher than basal in the preovulatory phase until progesterone started to increase in the postovulatory phase [day +8 from luteinizing hormone (LH) surge]. High-density-lipoprotein cholesterol was significantly higher than basal from day -1 to the day after LH surge, whereas plasma apoAI levels were significantly higher from day -8 to day +8 (from LH surge). Plasma apo(a) increased significantly during the luteal phase in four women characterized by a single S4 band and lower basal plasma levels of apo(a). Our results indicate that endogenous female sex steroids have significant effects on the circulating levels of plasma lipids and apolipoproteins, including apo(a). More work needs to be done to elucidate the significance of the observed apo(a) changes, and the different phases of the menstrual cycle must be taken into account when evaluating the lipidic risk profile in premenopausal women.

Method-dependent increase in lipoprotein(a) in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus during pregnancy

The current prevalent view is that plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentrations are under strong genetic control. Most dietary and drug interventions seem to have little or no effect on plasma Lp(a) levels. However, evidence for a possible regulatory rol e of hormones is accumulating, for instance, fluctuations of Lp(a) levels during pregnancy have been reported. Also, in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) patients, elevated Lp(a) levels have been reported. In the present longitudinal study, plasma lipid concentrations, including Lp(a), were determined in IDDM women before pregnancy, during pregnancy, and 3 months postpartum. In our study population, Lp(a) concentration was not significantly correlated with either hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels of apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] phenotype. Changes in other lipid parameters observed during pregnancy in our IDDM population were similar to those reported during normal pregnancy. Lp(a) concentrations were quantified using two different immunochemical methods that possess different sensitivities and specificities: an immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) using two different anti-apo(a) antibodies, and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using an anti-apo(a) and an anti-apo B antibody. Median prepregnancy Lp(a) concentrations were 118 mg/L (range, 15 to 672) as determined with the IRMA and 107 mg/L (range, 21 to 451) as determined with the ELISA. Women with IDDM showed, in general, no significant change in Lp(a) concentration during pregnancy when it was assayed with the IRMA, although a tendency to increased values was observed. When Lp(a) concentrations were determined with the ELISA, a strong and significant increase in Lp(a) from weeks 17 to 24 of pregnancy onward was found. The latter results confirm the prevalent view that during pregnancy Lp(a) levels are increased. However, the present results and those of others and Lp(a) in normal pregnancy strongly emphasize the importance of method selection when determining Lp(a) concentrations.

Ethnic differences in lipid and lipoprotein metabolism in pregnant women of African and Caucasian origin

AIMS

To investigate differences in serum lipid, lipoprotein and apolipoprotein concentrations in pregnant women of different ethnic origin.

METHODS

Serum lipid, lipoprotein and apolipoprotein concentrations were measured in 232 women (114 Caucasians, 118 Africans/Afro-Caribbeans), who presented consecutively for screening for gestational diabetes in the third trimester of pregnancy.

RESULTS

African/Afro-Caribbean pregnant women had lower serum concentrations of total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, and apolipoprotein B and higher high density lipoprotein cholesterol and Lp(a) lipoprotein concentrations compared with Caucasian women. Apolipoprotein A1 concentrations were similar in the two groups. The differences were not attributable to differences in weight, age, parity, or postload plasma glucose levels.

CONCLUSION

Ethnic origin is an important determinant of serum lipid, lipoprotein and apolipoprotein concentrations during pregnancy.

Apolipoprotein(a) phenotype-associated decrease in lipoprotein(a) plasma concentrations after renal transplantation

High lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] plasma concentrations are an independent risk factor for atherosclerosis. In the general population, Lp(a) levels are primarily determined by allelic variation at the apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] gene locus. Apo(a) isoforms of various sizes are associated with different Lp(a) concentrations. Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) have elevated plasma concentrations of Lp(a), which are not explained by the size variation at the apo(a) gene locus. To further investigate the origin of the elevated Lp(a) plasma concentrations, we examined Lp(a) concentrations and apo(a) phenotypes in 154 ESRD patients undergoing renal transplantation. In a prospective longitudinal study we observed a rapid normalization of Lp(a) levels from an average concentration of 25.9 +/- 28.7 mg/dL before to 17.9 +/- 25.5 mg/dL 3 weeks after renal transplantation (P < .0001). Only patients with high-molecular-weight phenotypes had a significant decrease in Lp(a) plasma concentrations. This study demonstrates the nongenetic origin of elevated Lp(a) concentrations in ESRD patients, which is obviously caused by the disease. It further confirms a phenotype-associated elevation of Lp(a) concentrations in ESRD.

Pregnancy in a patient with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia treated with long-term low-density lipoprotein apheresis

The pregnancy and delivery of a subject with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and coronary artery disease (CAD) were monitored closely for signs of maternal and fetal distress. Biweekly treatment with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis using dextran-sulfate cellulose columns was continued throughout the pregnancy, and lipid and lipoprotein levels were evaluated. During the course of the pregnancy and delivery, no signs of maternal coronary insufficiency developed. Serial ultrasonographic measurements of fetal growth indices and the blood flow velocity waveforms (FVWs) of the uterine and umbilical artery did not reveal any sign of fetal growth retardation or insufficiency of the uteroplacental circulation, respectively. During pregnancy, time-averaged concentrations of serum total cholesterol (TC), LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), apolipoprotein (apo) B, and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] showed a gradual decline. Notwithstanding LDL apheresis, a gradual twofold increase of serum triglyceride (TG) levels was found. In the second and third trimester, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels showed a 55% increase that coincided with a 75% reduction in hepatic lipase activity in postheparin plasma, normalizing after parturition. After delivery, lp(a) levels showed an almost twofold increase, which could not be explained by the interruption of LDL apheresis alone, and may be caused by changes in gonadal steroids. Histologic examination of the placenta and the umbilical arteries revealed no atherosclerotic changes, infarctions, or lipid deposits. In general, long-term LDL apheresis in homozygous FH can delay the onset and complications of severe CAD. In case of a pregnancy, LDL apheresis seems feasible and should be continued during the pregnancy to prevent superimposed hyperlipidemia and placental insufficiency.

Lp(a) lipoprotein in cardiovascular disease

The article summarizes the increased knowledge about the enigmatic Lp(a) lipoprotein and its clinical importance over the past 20 years. The mode of inheritance, the unique features of Lp(a) composition and structure and the unusual distribution of the mainly genetically determined plasma Lp(a) levels are discussed. The main factors that can significantly change the inherited plasma Lp(a) levels are endocrine disorders and hormone treatment. It seems possible that sex hormones protect females to a large extent from the potentially deleterious effects of inherited high Lp(a) levels until menopause. The exceptionally strong independent association found in most studies between Lp(a) lipoprotein levels and atherosclerotic disorders indicates that Lp(a) is a factor of outstanding importance in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Probable pathogenetic mechanisms are reviewed. The associations found between LP(a) and insulin release, rheumatoid arthritis and renal diseases suggest that Lp(a) may be involved in immunological mechanisms. In a new hypothesis it is suggested that an autoimmune process might especially occur in individuals with inherited high Lp(a) levels and certain HLA class II genotypes, triggered by a concurrent infection.

Lipoprotein(a) in smoking and non-smoking pregnant women

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) levels were studied in 68 non-smoking and 118 smoking pregnant women and compared with a control group of 29 subjectively healthy, age matched non-smoking females. The median Lp(a) concentration of the total group of non-smoking pregnant women (123 mg l-1) surpassed significantly that of the pregnant smokers of comparable gestational age (64 mg l-1). The last group was not significantly different to the control group (67 mg l-1). Comparison of the smoking and non-smoking pregnant women showed significantly higher Lp(a) values during the last trimester of gestation (> or = 28 weeks) in non-smokers. The higher Lp(a) concentration in the plasma of non-smoking women during a normal pregnancy might be a physiological necessity. In that case lower levels of Lp(a), as seen in the last trimester of the smoking pregnant group, might be unfavourable for the normal development of the rapidly growing fetus in the last stage of the gestation.

Serum lipids, lipoproteins and apolipoproteins in pregnant non-diabetic patients

AIMS

To investigate the effect of pregnancy on serum concentrations of lipids, lipoproteins, and apolipoproteins.

METHODS

Fasting serum concentrations of total cholesterol, triglyceride, low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL), apolipoproteins AI, AII, and B, and lipoprotein (a) were measured in 178 women with normal glucose tolerance in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy and in a control group of 58 non-pregnant women of similar age. Data were analysed using the unpaired t test and by one-way analysis of variance.

RESULTS

The pregnant women had significantly higher concentrations of total cholesterol, triglyceride, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and apolipoproteins AI and B (p < 0.001) and apolipoprotein AII (p = 0.003) than the control women. The ratio of apolipoprotein B:apolipoprotein AI was significantly higher in the pregnant women than in the controls (p < 0.001), but the total cholesterol:HDL cholesterol ratio was not significantly different. No significant difference was found in the concentration of lipoprotein (a).

CONCLUSIONS

Hyperlipidaemia is common in the second half of pregnancy. This may be a purely physiological response to pregnancy or it may be indicative of pathology in some women. These results warrant a follow up study to investigate whether the hyperlipidaemic response to pregnancy is variable and if so, whether it can predict future hyperlipidaemia in a manner analogous to that of impaired glucose tolerance during pregnancy, predicting non-insulin dependent diabetes in later life.

Lipoprotein(a) concentrations in cord and capillary blood from newborns and in serum from in-patient children, adolescents and adults

Investigations have been made upon the distribution of lipoprotein(a) concentrations in cord and capillary blood from newborns and in serum from in-patient children and adults. Full-term neonates (n = 123), children aged 1 month to 16 years (n = 331) and adults aged between 17 and 88 years (n = 252) of age were included in the study. Lipoprotein(a) was determined using an immunoluminometric assay and a single lot of reagents. The assay had an effective measuring range of 1-800 mg/l. Lipoprotein(a) could be measured either in cord or capillary blood in the majority of cases. Problems arose in isolated cases, in each of which there was a large concentration difference in lipoprotein(a) between mother and child. The correlation data was: r = 0.897, n = 37, log (capillary blood) = 0.874 log (cord blood) + 0.165. The median lipoprotein(a) concentrations in cord and capillary blood were 13.9 and 10.2 mg/l respectively. Median lipoprotein(a) concentrations increased from birth up until the 6th decade (159 mg/l), decreasing to 95 mg/l during the 9th decade of life. In mature newborns, the median lipoprotein(a) concentrations correlated with gestational age. The distribution of lipoprotein(a) concentrations in serum is skewed throughout life, the ratio mean/median being 2.07 at birth, 2.71 in children and 2.72 in adults. The percentage of children with lipoprotein(a) concentrations above 250 mg/l was 23.0 (male) and 23.8 (female). The corresponding figures for adults was 38.2 for males and 28.2 for females respectively. In the group of newborns 27.7 percent had concentrations above 25 mg/l.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Hormonal agents used in lowering lipoprotein(a)

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) plasma concentrations in Caucasian populations are classified as a quantitative genetic trait. Although the prevailing view has been that Lp(a) levels are affected by age and gender, recent data are beginning to indicate otherwise. Lp(a) levels change throughout life especially in females after menopause. Lp(a) levels decrease in women treated with anabolic steroids such as stanozolol and danazol. The Lp(a) plasma concentration is also profoundly affected by sex hormone variations during pregnancy. In men with prostatic cancer Lp(a) levels are reduced about 50% by estrogen therapy, and increased 20% by orchidectomy. We have evaluated the changes in Lp(a) and lipid levels in postmenopausal women following estrogen/progestogen replacement therapy. The mean level of Lp(a) in treated women was about 50% lower after 6 and 12 months of replacement therapy. A significant correlation between basal Lp(a) levels and the changes at either 6 or 12 months was observed, suggesting that therapy was particularly efficacious in those women with high basal Lp(a) levels. One year after therapy cessation, Lp(a) concentrations tended to return to pre-therapy values. In addition estrogen-progestogen treatment significantly lowered total-cholesterol (12%) and LDL-cholesterol (28%), and increased HDL-cholesterol (18%). From these studies it appears that sex hormones are actively involved in the modulation of plasma Lp(a) levels and that both female and male sex hormones possess a lowering effect. The results confirm a direct effect of sex hormones on Lp(a) metabolism and suggest that estrogen-progestogen treatment of postmenopausal women can improve the lipid profile not only by lowering total- and LDL-cholesterol and raising HDL cholesterol, but also by lowering plasma Lp(a).

Triglyceride-rich lipoprotein interactions with Lp(a)

We found a significantly reduced incidence of increased lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) levels in subjects with triglycerides (TG) greater than 150 mg/dl compared with those with TG levels lower than 150 mg/dl. This was the case in patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease (CAD) and in subjects with no CAD. We explored the potential role of lipoprotein lipase (LPL) in mediating this relationship. Lp(a) and LDL2 exhibited a minimal effect on the rate constant for degradation of VLDL-TG by LPL (13% inhibition). Binding analyses indicated no differences between VLDL and LDL with respect to Lp(a) binding, and lipolysis only reduced binding by 30% at 75% degradation of VLDL-TG. Our study indicates that the inverse relationship between elevated plasma TG and Lp(a) levels is not caused by activation of LPL by Lp(a) either due to failure of Lp(a) to bind to VLDL or its lipolytic remnants. It is hypothesized that this relationship could stem from the enhanced clearance of TG-rich lipoproteins in individuals with higher levels of Lp(a) by receptor-mediated events.

The relationship between serum levels of lipoprotein(a) and proteins associated with the acute phase response

The association of serum lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) with inflammation was investigated in a primarily rheumatologic study group (n = 570; 202 males and 368 females) by studying the relationship between serum levels of Lp(a) and a panel of acute phase proteins (C-reactive protein (CRP), alpha 1-antitrypsin (AAT), alpha 1-acid glycoprotein (AGP), haptoglobin (HPT), complement components 3 and 4 (C3, C4), prealbumin (PAL), albumin (ALB) and transferrin (TRF)). Lp(a) data were adjusted for age and sex, but not clinical condition as no significant differences in Lp(a) levels were observed, using analysis of variance, among the 15 diagnostic categories in the study group. Univariate analyses revealed significant positive associations between Lp(a) levels and levels of C4, AGP, C3 and HPT. Multivariate analysis revealed that C4 and AGP (in descending order of significance) were significant independent predictors of Lp(a) concentration, together accounting for 2.9% of the variability in Lp(a) concentration in the present study group. The data indicate that confounding effects of an acute phase response should be considered in epidemiologic studies, if a high prevalence of inflammation is suspected.

Serum lipoprotein(a) in healthy Japanese children 5 years of age

Serum lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentrations were investigated in 155 Japanese children aged 5 years. The frequency distribution of Lp(a) concentrations was highly skewed and ranged from 1 to 109 mg/dL. The mean and median values of Lp(a) were 16.5 mg/dL (s.d. 17.3 mg/dL) and 12 mg/dL. The incidence of Lp(a) concentrations > or = 30 mg/dL was significantly high in children with total cholesterol > or = 200 mg/dL, not including the case of familial hypercholesterolaemia. Log Lp(a) values showed an inverse correlation with bodyweight and body mass index. No significant differences in Lp(a) levels could be seen between the groups according to the presence or absence of coronary heart disease and cerebral vascular accident in family histories. The results suggest that Lp(a) in Japanese children aged 5 years was essentially the same as that in adults. Further study may be needed to disclose the factors that influence Lp(a) concentration in childhood.

Plasma triglycerides and lipoprotein(a): inverse relationship in a hyperlipidemic Italian population

The relationship between plasma lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) levels and other clinical/biochemical variables was investigated in 1200 consecutive hyperlipidemic patients. Plasma Lp(a) concentrations were measured by a sandwich-ELISA method, while the patients were either on diet or diet plus lipid-lowering drugs; 38% of them had a plasma Lp(a) level > 30 mg/dl. The median plasma Lp(a) concentration and the frequency of Lp(a) > 30 mg/dl were significantly lower in individuals with severe hypertriglyceridemia vs. hypercholesterolemics (HC) or mixed hyperlipidemics (M-HLP), but similar to normolipidemic healthy controls. Patients with isolated moderate hypertriglyceridemia had Lp(a) levels intermediate between HC and M-HLP subjects. The in vitro addition of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins to normotriglyceridemic plasma did not affect the Lp(a) measurement. Plasma Lp(a) concentrations in the whole hyperlipidemic population correlated negatively with triglycerides and positively with total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol and age, being unrelated to either body mass index or lipid-lowering treatment. In HC patients, the presence of tendon xanthomas was associated with twofold higher Lp(a) levels. These findings argue for a regulatory role of triglycerides on plasma Lp(a) levels in hyperlipidemic patients.