Alteration of lipoprotein(a) concentration with glycemic control in non-insulin-dependent diabetic subjects without diabetic complications

Correlation between lipoprotein(a) and other risk factors for cardiovascular disease and diabetes in Cherokee Indians: the Cherokee Diabetes Study

PURPOSE

To study the age and gender effects on the distribution of lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] and its relationship with other cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes risk factors in the participants of the Cherokee Diabetes Study (CDS) (1995-2000).

METHODS

The CDS is a population based cross-sectional study of diabetes and its risk factors in Cherokee Indians aged 5 to 40 years of Oklahoma. Lp(a) levels were measured in 2205 participants.

RESULTS

The median Lp(a) (mg/dL) levels in the females were not significantly different among four age groups (5-9, 10-19, 20-29, and 30-40 years). However, the 20- to 29-year-old males had significantly lower Lp(a) levels than the males 10 to 19 and 30 to 40 years old. Females had significantly higher Lp(a) levels than males in the 20- to 29-year-old age group only. In the 5- to 19-year-old children/adolescents, Lp(a) levels were significantly negatively correlated with the degree of Indian heritage (DIH) and positively correlated with total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoproteins (LDL), and apolipoprotein B (apoB) in girls, but not in boys. In the young adults aged 20 to 29 years, Lp(a) levels were significantly correlated with DIH, body mass index (BMI), waist-hip ratio (WHR), percentage of body fat (PBF), systolic blood pressure (SBP), triglycerides (TG), 2-hour plasma glucose (2hPG), and insulin in males, and DIH, PBF, TC, LDL, TG, and insulin in females. In adults aged 30 to 40 years, Lp(a) levels were significantly correlated with DIH, TG, and LDL in females, and DIH and insulin in males.

CONCLUSION

In the girls, Lp(a) levels appear to be associated with several CVD and diabetes risk factors at an early age (5-19 years), while in the boys, the association occurs at older ages (> 19 years). There are significant age and gender differences regarding the distribution of Lp(a) and its correlates in the 5 to 9, 10 to 19, and 20 to 29-year-old age groups, but the differences tend to be weaker in the 30- to 40-year-old age group. For the same age and gender groups, Lp(a) concentrations in Cherokee Indians were much lower than those reported in blacks and slightly lower than those in whites. In Cherokee Indians, the Lp(a) levels were consistently and positively correlated with LDL, and negatively correlated with DIH, TG, and insulin.

Insulin sensitivity and Lp(alpha) concentrations in normoglycemic offspring of type 2 diabetic parents

Background

Offspring of at least 1 parent with type 2 diabetes are more resistant to the insulin action, exhibit higher incidence of dyslipidemia and are more prone to cardiovascular diseases. The association between Lp(α) and coronary heart disease is well established. An association between Lp(α) concentration and insulin sensitivity was examined in this study.

We investigated the serum LP(α) in 41 offspring of 41 families of type 2 diabetic subjects (group I) with normal glucose tolerance, compared to 49 offspring who their parents had no history of type 2 diabetes, matched for sex, age, BMI, WHR and blood pressure (group II). Serum Lp(α), triglycerides, insulin resistant index, HDL, LDL-cholesterol and insulin were measured.

Results

The offspring of type 2 diabetic subjects had higher fasting serum triglycerides (mean ± SD 199.3 ± 184.2 vs. 147.1 ± 67.9 ng/dl, p < 0.05) lower HDL-cholesterol (37.3 ± 9.0 vs. 44.6 ± 7.8, p < 0.001) and particularly higher Insulin resistance Index (HOMA-IR) (2.84 ± 1.39 vs. 1.67 ± 0.77, p < 0.001).

They also had higher serum LP(α) concentration (15.4 ± 6.7 vs. 8.6 ± 6.0, p < 0.001). By simple linear analysis in the offspring of type 2 diabetic parents there was no correlation of Lp(α) concentration with insulin resistance index Homa-IR (r = 0,016 p = NS).

Conclusions

We conclude that serum LP(α) is significantly increased in offspring of type 2 diabetic subjects but was not related to insulin sensitivity.

Predictors of lipoprotein(a) levels in a European and South Asian population in the Newcastle Heart Project

BACKGROUND

Understanding of the higher susceptibility of South Asians to coronary heart disease is limited. One explanation is the combination of high prevalence of insulin resistance with higher lipoprotein(a) levels.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Lipoprotein(a) levels and genotypes in three South Asian groups aged 25-74 years (Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi) were compared with a European population in a cross-sectional study. Biochemical measurements included lipids, apolipoprotein A1 and B, glucose, insulin and fibrinogen. Insulin sensitivity was calculated using the homoeostasis model assessment method (HOMA).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in lipoprotein(a) levels between South Asian and European men. South Asian women combined had higher lipoprotein(a) levels than European women, a difference probably resulting from higher lipoprotein(a) levels in Pakistani women compared with Indian and Bangladeshi women. Fasting insulin and HOMA were negatively associated with Lp(a) in South Asians though the associations were statistically significant only in men. There were only modest associations between most cardiovascular risk factors and Lp(a). Twenty-seven apolipoprotein(a) size alleles were detected in the three South Asian groups ranging from 16 to 43 kringle-IV repeats. The apolipoprotein(a) size polymorphism explained 23% of the variability in lipoprotein(a) levels in South Asians.

CONCLUSIONS

There were few nongenetic predictors of lipoprotein(a) levels in South Asians and Europeans. The lack of difference in Lp(a) between the South Asian and European men and the fact that differences between the women seemed to be confined to the Pakistani group offer little support to the hypothesis that higher Lp(a) levels contribute to the increased risk of heart disease in South Asians. Our findings do not support the hypothesis that susceptibility to heart disease in South Asians results from a combination of high insulin resistance and high Lp(a) levels.

Lipoprotein(a) level and lipids in type 2 diabetic patients and their normoglycemic first-degree relatives in type 2 diabetic pedigrees

We investigated alterations of serum levels of Lp(a) and lipid profiles in type 2 diabetic patients and their normoglycemic first-degree relatives to evaluate the potential genetic association among these subjects. Serum Lp(a), triglycerride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C), and low density lipoprotein (LDL-C) levels were analyzed in 62 type 2 diabetic patients and 67 normoglycemic first-degree relatives from 29 type 2 diabetic pedigrees, and 45 healthy controls without family histories of diabetes. Dyslipidemia was observed in diabetics and their normoglycemic first-degree relatives. While higher serum TG levels were observed in both type 2 diabetics and their first-degree relatives than those in controls, higher TG levels in diabetics were found when compared with those in first-degree relatives. Meanwhile, lower serum HDL-C levels were observed in both type 2 diabetic patients and their first-degree relatives than those in controls. No significant difference of serum TC and LDL-C levels was found among the three groups. On the other hand, we did not observe significant differences of serum Lp(a) levels between type 2 diabetic patients and normoglycemic first-degree relatives, nor were any significant differences observed between diabetic patients and healthy controls (24.6+/-19.9 vs. 25.8+/-21.2, and 21.3+/-20.5 mg/dl). Although the average serum Lp(a) levels were similar in all subgroups, we did observe a positive correlation of Lp(a) between type 2 diabetic patients and their offspring (r=0.448, P<0.01), suggesting a potential genetic control for Lp(a) levels in type 2 diabetics families.

Plasmatic homocysteine concentration and its relationship with complications associated to diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND AND METHODS

In the search for new factors of cardiovascular risk associated to diabetes mellitus (DM), special attention has been paid in recent years to hyperhomocysteinaemia. Therefore, we have established the concentration of homocysteine (Hcy) and other biochemical parameters in the plasma of a group of 57 type 1 and 32 type 2 diabetic patients and 54 control subjects and studied whether plasmatic homocysteinaemia was related to macroangiopathy, nephropathy, retinopathy and neuropathy. Because of significant differences for plasma Hcy values between men and women in the control group, we distinguished between both groups throughout the study.

RESULTS

Patients with DM had higher Hcy than control subjects (11.7+/-5.4 vs. 10.1+/-2.4 micromol/l, p<0.05). Fasting hyperhomocysteinaemia was considered as the mean of the plasma Hcy for control subjects+2 SD (14.9 micromol/l in total group, 15.6 micromol/l in males and 13.9 micromol/l in females). In the studied groups with complications, we found significant differences between normohomocysteinaemic type 1 diabetic patients and those considered hyperhomocysteinaemic by us. On the other hand, patients having type 1 DM and complications had higher plasmatic Hcy concentration than those with no complications.

CONCLUSIONS

We have found a relationship between high Hcy levels and prevalence of macroangiopathy, retinopathy and nephropathy in the type 1 diabetic patients, which was not been observed in the type 2 diabetic patients of our study. As a result, we consider plasmatic Hcy a complication-risk indicator in type 1 DM, and we recommend its use together with already established biochemical parameters in the control of the evolution of the disease.

Lipoprotein(a) in American Indians is low and not independently associated with cardiovascular disease. The Strong Heart Study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the distribution of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) and assess its association to cardiovascular disease (CVD) in American Indians.

METHODS

Lp(a) was measured in 3991 American Indians (aged 45-74 years with no prior history of CVD at baseline) from 13 communities in Arizona, Oklahoma, and South/North Dakota. They were followed prospectively from 1989 to 1997 for CVD. The distribution of Lp(a) was examined by center, sex, and diabetic status. Spearman correlation coefficients and Cox regression models were used to evaluate the association of Lp(a) to CVD.

RESULTS

A total of 388 participants subsequently developed CVD. Median Lp(a) concentration in American Indians was 3.0 mg/dl. This was almost half of that in whites and one sixth in blacks from the CARDIA study measured by the same method. Nondiabetic participants had significantly higher Lp(a) levels than diabetic participants for both genders. Lp(a) levels were higher in women than in men for nondiabetic participants, but there was no gender difference for diabetic participants. Correlation analysis showed Lp(a) was significantly negatively correlated with the degree of Indian heritage, insulin, triglycerides (TG), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and 2-hour plasma glucose (2hPG), and positively with low-density lipoproteins (LDL), apoprotein B (apoB), and fibrinogen (FIB). In Cox regression models, adjusting for other risk factors, Lp(a) was no longer a significant predictor of CVD in either diabetic or nondiabetic participants.

CONCLUSIONS

The lower concentration of Lp(a) in American Indians and the high correlation with Indian heritage confirm the concept that Lp(a) concentration is in large part genetically determined. Lp(a) concentration is not an independent predictor of CVD among American Indians; it is higher in those who develop CVD because of its positive correlation with LDL, apoB, and FIB.

Glycation amplifies lipoprotein(a)-induced alterations in the generation of fibrinolytic regulators from human vascular endothelial cells

Increased lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] in plasma is an independent risk factor for premature cardiovascular diseases. The levels of glycated Lp(a) are elevated in diabetic patients. The present study demonstrated that glycation enhanced Lp(a)-induced production of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), and further decreased the generation of tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) from human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) and human coronary artery EC. The levels of PAI-1 mRNA and its antigen in the media of HUVEC were significantly increased following treatments with 5 microgram/ml of glycated Lp(a) compared to equal amounts of native Lp(a). The secretion and de novo synthesis of t-PA, but not its mRNA level, in EC were reduced by glycated Lp(a) compared to native Lp(a). Treatment with aminoguanidine, an inhibitor for the formation of advanced glycation end products (AGEs), during glycation normalized the generation of PAI-1 and t-PA induced by glycated Lp(a). Butylated hydroxytoluene, a potent antioxidant, inhibited native and glycated Lp(a)-induced changes in PAI-1 and t-PA generation in EC. The results indicate that glycation amplifies Lp(a)-induced changes in the generation of PAI-1 and t-PA from venous and arterial EC. This may attenuate fibrinolytic activity in blood circulation and potentially contributes to the increased incidence of cardiovascular complications in diabetic patients with hyperlipoprotein(a). EC-mediated oxidative modification and the formation of AGEs may be implicated in glycated Lp(a)-induced alterations in the generation of fibrinolytic regulators from vascular EC.

The effect of long-term glycaemic control on serum lipoprotein(a) levels in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus

AIMS

To examine whether long-term glycaemic control affects lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) levels in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

Eighty-nine Type 2 diabetic patients (38 men, 51 women) were recruited from the diabetes clinic. Based on HbA1c concentrations at baseline, patients were divided into two groups: those with HbA1c < 8.0% (n =45) and those with HbA1c > or = 8.0% (n=44). Comparisons of Lp(a) levels were made between both groups. The effect of long-term glycaemic control on Lp(a) levels was investigated in a subgroup of 20 patients, selected from those with baseline HbA1c > or = 8%. All these patients were treated with a goal of HbA1c <7%.

RESULTS

Lp(a) levels were not significantly different between those with HbA1c< 8.0% and those with HbA1c, > or = 8.0%. No correlation between Lp(a) and HbA1c or fasting blood glucose levels was noted in diabetic patients as a whole. After 2 years of intensive glycaemic control, all patients exhibited remarkable improvement of therapy: their average HbA1c levels were 6.5 +/- 0.7%, being < 7% in 70% of patients. However, no change in Lp(a) levels were observed after 2 years (19.5 +/- 14.8-21.4 +/- 13.4 mg/dl, P = 0.390).

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that improvement of glycaemic control does not affect serum Lp(a) levels in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Serum LP(a) levels in African aboriginal Pygmies and Bantus, compared with Caucasian and Asian population samples

Serum lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) and its correlates were studied in African Aboriginal Pygmies (n = 146) and Bantus (n = 208) from Cameroon. Geometric mean Lp(a) levels were 274 and 289 mg/l in Bantu males and females, respectively, and 220 and 299 mg/l in Pygmy males and females, the gender difference being significant in Pygmies (p = 0.024). In Pygmies 41% and 52% of the males and females, respectively, had Lp(a) levels above 300 mg/l, compared with 47% and 55% in Bantus. Overall, Lp(a) levels did not significantly differ between Pygmies and Bantus, and did not correlate with age, body mass index (BMI), systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Compared with healthy Asian and Caucasian population samples, age- and BMI-adjusted geometric Lp(a) means were 2.3- to 5.0-fold higher in Pygmy and Bantu males, and 2.9- to 3.6-fold higher in Pygmy and Bantu females (p < or = 0.05). Across the population samples studied ethnicity predicted 12% and 17% of serum Lp(a) variance in males and females, respectively.

Monthly intra-individual variation in lipoprotein(a) in 22 normal subjects over 12 months

OBJECTIVES

It is generally believe that lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) levels remain relatively constant in the same individual, but there is a paucity of data to substantiate this belief. This study was undertaken to determine the extent of intra-individual variation in Lp(a) over a 12-month period.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Lp(a) was measured monthly in duplicate over a 12-month period in 11 females and 11 males who were healthy, free-living, normal subjects by the Incstar Immunoprecipitin method using a goat antibody which was monospecific for Lp(a).

RESULTS

Some subjects showed considerable month-to-month variations which were not correlated with changes in other lipid parameters or with weight. Others showed fairly constant Lp(a) levels, with a few values which were quite different from the rest. This was not attributable to methodological factors; low and high controls gave mean (mg/L), SD and CV values of 181, 8.6, 4.7 and 431, 14, 3.3, respectively. The difference between the minimum and maximum values in the same individuals ranged from a low of 14 mg/L in one subject to a high of 229 mg/L in another over the one-year period.

CONCLUSIONS

Lp(a) showed greater intra-individual variations in normal subjects than is commonly believed. It is therefore recommended that Lp(a) should be measured sequentially over a few weeks to arrive at a mean value for assessing risk of coronary heart disease.

Plasma lipoprotein(a) distribution in the Framingham Offspring Study as determined with a commercially available immunoturbidimetric assay

The purpose of our research was to evaluate a commercially available, automated, immunoturbidimetric assay for lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)), to determine the distribution of Lp(a) in the Framingham Offspring Study population, and to determine Lp(a) levels that may be useful for assessing coronary heart disease risk. The mean between-run coefficient of variation for this assay was 5.65%. Lp(a) concentration was slightly, but significantly, higher in 1949 white women (mean +/- S.D. 214 +/- 195 mg/l, median 150 mg/l) than in 1884 white men (mean +/- S.D. 200 +/- 193 mg/l, median 130 mg/l) participating in Cycle 4 of the Framingham Offspring Study (P = 0.0015). Lp(a) values of 300 mg/l and 500 mg/l corresponded to approximately the 75th and 90th percentiles, respectively, for both men and women, and subjects with concentrations greater than or equal to 500 mg/l were more likely to have coronary heart disease than subjects with an Lp(a) concentration less than 300 mg/l (P < 0.05 for men).

Lipoprotein(a) concentrations and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: relationship to glycaemic control and diabetic complications

The aim of our study was to determine the lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) levels in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) and to evaluate Lp(a) concentrations in relation to glycaemic control and diabetic complications. We evaluate in a cross-sectional study a total of 103 NIDDM patients (52 males and 51 females; mean age of 62.5 years; mean of diabetes duration: 12 years) referred to our hospital because of poor glycaemic control, and a group of 108 non-diabetic subjects (57 males and 51 females).

RESULTS

mean Lp(a) concentration did not significantly differ between NIDDM patients and non-diabetic subjects (11.1 +/- 14 vs. 16.2 +/- 14 mg/dl). The distribution of Lp(a) levels was highly skewed towards the lower levels in both groups, being over 30 mg/dl in only 6% of NIDDM patients and 12% of controls. Patients with Lp(a) levels over 10 mg/dl had lower haemoglobin Alc (HbA1c) than patients with Lp(a) levels over 10 mg/dl (8.5% vs. 10.4%; P < 0.01). Lp(a) concentration was positively correlated with body mass index (BMI) (P < 0.05) and HbA1c (P < 0.05). No association was found between Lp(a) and sex, age, other lipidic parameters, microalbuminuria, type of treatment and presence of cardiovascular disease. These findings may suggest that glycaemic control could have a modulatory role on Lp(a) concentration in NIDDM patients. In this study, diabetic complications did not seem to be associated with higher Lp(a) concentrations.

Lipoprotein(a) concentrations in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and borderline hyperglycemia: a population-based study

The objective of the study was to compare lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentrations in population-based samples of individuals with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), borderline hyperglycemia, and normoglycemia. From 2,740 male Italian Telephone Company employees aged 40 to 59 years participating in a health screening, we selected all those with NIDDM (n = 100) plus a random sample of 950 nondiabetic individuals. Diabetes was defined as fasting plasma glucose (FPG) of at least 140 mg/dL or current use of hypoglycemic drugs. Among nondiabetic individuals, 854 were defined as normoglycemic (FPG < 115 mg/dL) and 95 were defined as borderline hyperglycemic (115 < FPG < 140 mg/dL). Lp(a) level was measured on frozen plasma by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Lp(a) concentrations were similar in people with NIDDM, borderline hyperglycemia, and normoglycemia: 11.2 +/- 14, 14.1 +/- 20, and 13.9 +/- 18 mg/dL, respectively (F = 1.03). Accordingly, the proportion of subjects with Lp(a) levels of at least 30 mg/dL was comparable in the three groups (12%, 15%, and 14%; chi 2 = 3.95, P = .41). Results were not confounded by differences in age, body mass index (BMI), waist to hip ratio, plasma lipids, alcohol consumption, physical activity, and use of drugs. Furthermore, within the diabetic group Lp(a) levels were not significantly different for those on diet only versus those on oral agents (10.8 +/- 14.1 v 11.7 +/- 14.7, P = .7) or for people with FPG of at least 180 as compared with people with FPG less than 180 mg/dL (9.9 +/- 12.8 v 11.5 +/- 14.8, P = .5).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Lipoprotein (a)

Lipoprotein (a) is similar to low-density lipoprotein but is unique in having an additional apolipoprotein called apolipoprotein (a) (apo(a)) covalently linked to it. apo(a), which is a member of the plasminogen gene superfamily, has a protease domain which cannot be activated to cause fibrinolysis. Its sequence of kringles is much longer than that of plasminogen and there is remarkable genetic variation in its length. The consequent inherited differences in apo(a) molecular mass are largely responsible for the wide range of serum Lp(a) concentrations in different individuals with low levels predominating in Europid populations. Physiologically Lp(a) may participate in haemocoagulation or in wound-healing. Epidemiological evidence that it is a risk factor for atherosclerosis, particularly in populations with high serum LDL levels, has led to research to uncover its role in atherogenesis and thrombosis. Diseases such as renal disease, and probably atherogenesis and thrombosis. Diseases such as renal disease, and probably atherosclerosis itself, are associated with an increase in Lp(a) above its genetically determined level and it remains a subject of speculation as to whether such increases are as closely involved in atherothrombosis as are spontaneously high levels resulting from low-molecular-mass apo(a) variants.

A sandwich ELISA based on anti-apo(a) and anti-apo B monoclonal antibodies for lipoprotein(a) measurement

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is one of the most important independent risk factors for the prediction of premature atherosclerosis. Lp(a) is a low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-like particle which contains a glycoprotein (apoprotein(a)) disulfide linked to apo B-100. We describe a sandwich ELISA based on an anti-apo(a) monoclonal antibody (MAb) and an anti-apo B MAb for the quantitative determination of Lp(a) in human serum. The assay is sensitive, precise and specific. Samples with different apo(a) isoforms had a linear response in a range of 3-70 mg/dl of Lp(a). Correlations between the ELISA and a commercial ELISA, an immunoradiometric assay and electroimmunodiffusion were 0.92, 0.96 and 0.98, respectively. The frequency distribution of Lp(a) concentration in blood donors showed the skew toward the right reported in other populations. Patients with angiographically assessed coronary atherosclerosis had three times higher levels of Lp(a) than those with no signs of coronary atherosclerosis.