Effect of pyridostigmine on the growth hormone response to growth hormone-releasing hormone in lean and obese type II Diabetic patients

Central and peripheral regulation of the GH/IGF-1 axis: GHRH and beyond

The regulation of growth hormone (GH) synthesis and secretion by somatotroph cells of the anterior pituitary is a highly complex process, mediated by a variety of neuroendocrine and peripheral influences. In particular, a key role is played by the hypothalamic peptides growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) and somatostatin, which regulate the somatotroph axis with opposite actions, stimulating and inhibiting GH release, respectively. Since the discovery of GHRH about 50 years ago, many pathophysiological studies have explored the underlying intricate hormonal balance that regulates GHRH secretion and its interplay with the somatotroph axis. Various molecules and pathophysiological states have been shown to modulate the release of GH, GHRH, somatostatin and GH secretagogues. Collectively, the available evidence demonstrates how a vast number of neural and peripheral signals are conveyed and integrated to orchestrate a finely tuned response of the somatotroph axis that adapts to the body's varying needs for growth, metabolism, and repair. The present review aims to summarize the available evidence regarding the key regulators involved in the modulation of the somatotroph axis in humans, presenting detailed molecular insights on the signaling cascades at play. The interplay between different mechanisms governing somatotroph secretion is highlighted, underscoring the nuanced interdependence that maintains homeostasis and facilitates the body's ability to respond to internal and external stimuli.

Secondary diabetes mellitus in acromegaly

Secondary diabetes mellitus (DM) is a common complication of acromegaly, encountered in up to 55% of cases. Vice versa, the prevalence of acromegaly is markedly higher in cohorts of patients with type 2 DM (T2DM). The presence of secondary DM depends primarily on acromegaly status and is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity, malignancy rate and overall mortality. The principal pathophysiologic mechanism is increased insulin resistance due to excessive lipolysis and altered fat distribution, reflected at the presence of intermuscular fat and attenuated, dysfunctional adipose tissue. Insulin resistance is ascribed to the direct, diabetogenic effects of growth hormone (GH), which prevail over the insulin-sensitizing effects of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), probably due to higher glucometabolic potency of GH, IGF-1 resistance, or both. Inversely, GH and IGF-1 act synergistically in increasing insulin secretion. Hyperinsulinemia in portal vein leads to enhanced responsiveness of liver GH receptors and IGF-1 production, pointing towards a mutually amplifying loop between GH-IGF-1 axis and insulin. Secondary DM occurs upon beta cell exhaustion, principally due to gluco-lipo-toxicity. Somatostatin analogues inhibit insulin secretion; especially pasireotide (PASI) impairs glycaemic profile in up to 75% of cases, establishing a separate pathophysiologic entity, PASI-induced DM. In contrast, pegvisomant and dopamine agonizts improve insulin sensitivity. In turn, metformin, pioglitazone and sodium-glucose transporters 2 inhibitors might be disease-modifying by counteracting hyperinsulinemia or acting pleiotropically. Large, prospective cohort studies are needed to validate the above notions and define optimal DM management in acromegaly.

[Discordant parameters of insulin-like growth factor 1 and growth hormone in the diagnosis and monitoring of acromegaly]

Acromegaly is a rare endocrine disorder associated with multiple complications and increased mortality. Timely diagnosis and adequate treatment can bring the life expectancy of patients with acromegaly closer to the general population level. The tests for the diagnosis of acromegaly are measurement of both serum GH, and GH after oral glucose administration; serum insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1). However, in clinical practice, up to 39% of patients with discordant results are found. The patients with discordant GH and IGF-1levels, are the most difficult to manage. This review discusses the prevalence of discordant GH and IGF-1 outcomes in patients with acromegaly; factors causing this discrepancy; the impact of hormone levels on treatment outcomes. Although endocrinologists are used to dealing with this discrepancy in clinical practice for many years, discordant patients'outcome remains uncertain and undefined The optimal treatment should be individually tailored for each patient, taking into account all clinical parameters.

[The role of glucose and insulin in the metabolic regulation of growth hormone secretion]

The exact physiological basis for the suppression of growth hormone secretion by oral glucose intake remains unknown, despite the widespread use of the oral glucose tolerance test in endocrinology. Lack of growth hormone suppression by glucose occurs in about a third of patients with acromegaly, as well as in other disorders. It is currently known that the secretion of growth hormone is affected by various factors, such as age, gender, body mass index, and the redistribution of adipose tissue. There is also evidence of the impact of overeating as well as being overweight on the secretion of growth hormone. It is known that both of these conditions are associated with hyperinsulinemia, which determines the possibility of its predominant role in suppressing the secretion of growth hormone. The purpose of this review is to discuss the accumulated data on the isolated effects of hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia on growth hormone secretion, as well as other metabolic regulators and conditions affecting its signaling. Understanding of the pathophysiological basis of these mechanisms is essential for further research of the role of glucose and insulin in the metabolic regulation of growth hormone secretion. However, the studies in animal models are complicated by interspecific differences in the response of growth hormone to glucose loading, and the only possible available model in healthy people may be the hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp.

Growth Hormone Response to Oral Glucose Load: From Normal to Pathological Conditions

The exact physiological basis of acute growth hormone (GH) suppression by oral glucose is not fully understood. Glucose-mediated increase in hypothalamic somatostatin seems to be the most plausible explanation. Attempts to better understand its underlying mechanisms are compromised by species disparities in the response of GH to glucose load. While in humans, glucose inhibits GH release, the acute elevation of circulating glucose levels in rats has either no effect on GH secretion or may be stimulatory. Likewise, chronic hyperglycemia alters GH release in both humans and rats nonetheless in opposite directions. Several factors influence nadir GH concentrations including, age, gender, body mass index, pubertal age, and the type of assay used. Besides the classical suppressive effects of glucose on GH release, a paradoxical GH increase to oral glucose may be observed in around one third of patients with acromegaly as well as in various other disorders. Though its pathophysiology is poorly characterized, an altered interplay between somatostatin and GH-releasing hormone has been suggested and a link with pituitary ectopic expression of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor has been recently demonstrated. A better understanding of the dynamics mediating GH response to glucose may allow a more optimal use of the OGTT as a diagnostic tool in various conditions, especially acromegaly.

Biochemical investigations in diagnosis and follow up of acromegaly

Measurements of human growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth-factor I (IGF-I) are cornerstones in the diagnosis of acromegaly. Both hormones are also used as biochemical markers in the evaluation of disease activity during treatment. Management of acromegaly is particularly challenging in cases where discordant information is obtained from measurement of GH concentrations following oral glucose load and from measurement of IGF-I. While in some patients biological factors can explain the discrepancy, in many cases issues with the analytical methods seem to be responsible. Assays used by endocrine laboratories to determine concentrations of GH and IGF-I underwent significant changes during the last decades. While generally leading to more sensitive and reproducible methods, these changes also had considerable impact on absolute concentrations measured. This must be reflected by updated decision limits, cut-offs and reference intervals. Since different commercially available assays do not agree very well, method specific interpretation of GH and IGF-I concentrations is required. This complexity in the interpretation of hormone concentrations is not always appropriately reflected in laboratory reports, but also not in clinical guidelines reporting decision limits not related to a specific analytical method. The present review provides an overview about methodological and biological variables affecting the biochemical assessment of acromegaly in diagnosis and follow up.

Current and Emerging Aspects of Diabetes Mellitus in Acromegaly

Diabetes mellitus is a frequent complication of acromegaly, a disease characterized by chronic hypersecretion of growth hormone (GH) by a pituitary adenoma. Diabetes occurs commonly but not only as a consequence of an insulin-resistant state induced by GH excess. The development of diabetes in patients with acromegaly is clinically relevant, since such a complication is thought to increase the already elevated cardiovascular morbidity and mortality risk of the disease. Emerging data suggest that a specific cardiomyopathy can be identified in acromegaly patients with diabetes. Moreover, the presence of diabetes may also influence therapeutic decision making in acromegaly, since traditional and newly developed drugs used in this clinical setting may impact glucose metabolism regardless of control of GH hypersecretion.

Neuroendocrine Regulation of Growth Hormone Secretion

This article reviews the main findings that emerged in the intervening years since the previous volume on hormonal control of growth in the section on the endocrine system of the Handbook of Physiology concerning the intra- and extrahypothalamic neuronal networks connecting growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH) and somatostatin hypophysiotropic neurons and the integration between regulators of food intake/metabolism and GH release. Among these findings, the discovery of ghrelin still raises many unanswered questions. One important event was the application of deconvolution analysis to the pulsatile patterns of GH secretion in different mammalian species, including Man, according to gender, hormonal environment and ageing. Concerning this last phenomenon, a great body of evidence now supports the role of an attenuation of the GHRH/GH/Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) axis in the control of mammalian aging.

Insulin and GH-IGF-I axis: endocrine pacer or endocrine disruptor?

Growth hormone/insulin-like growth factor (IGF) axis may play a role in maintaining glucose homeostasis in synergism with insulin. IGF-1 can directly stimulate glucose transport into the muscle through either IGF-1 or insulin/IGF-1 hybrid receptors. In severely decompensated diabetes including diabetic ketoacidosis, plasma levels of IGF-1 are low and insulin delivery into the portal system is required to normalize IGF-1 synthesis and bioavailability. Normalization of serum IGF-1 correlated with the improvement of glucose homeostasis during insulin therapy providing evidence for the use of IGF-1 as biomarker of metabolic control in diabetes. Taking apart the inherent mitogenic discussion, diabetes treatment using insulins with high affinity for the IGF-1 receptor may act as an endocrine pacer exerting a cardioprotective effect by restoring the right level of IGF-1 in bloodstream and target tissues, whereas insulins with low affinity for the IGF-1 receptor may lack this positive effect. An excessive and indirect stimulation of IGF-1 receptor due to sustained and chronic hyperinsulinemia over the therapeutic level required to overtake acute/chronic insulin resistance may act as endocrine disruptor as it may possibly increase the cardiovascular risk in the short and medium term and mitogenic/proliferative action in the long term. In conclusion, normal IGF-1 may be hypothesized to be a good marker of appropriate insulin treatment of the subject with diabetes and may integrate and make more robust the message coming from HbA1c in terms of prediction of cardiovascular risk.

Growth hormone response to GHRH + GHRP-6 in type 2 diabetes during euglycemic and hyperglycemic clamp

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of two different glucose levels on GH response to the combined administration of GHRH+GHRP-6 in patients with type 2 diabetes. GH response to i.v. bolus of GHRH+GHRP-6 (100 mcg, each) was measured in 12 male patients with type 2 diabetes (mean age: 53.9+/-1.59 years; BMI: 25.58+/-0.39 kg/m(2); mean HbA(1c): 8.7+/-0.42%), during a euglycemic (mean glucose: 4.92+/-0.08 mmol) hyperinsulinemic clamp (insulin infusion rate of 100 mU/kg/h) and a hyperglycemic clamp (mean glucose: 12.19+/-0.11 mmol/l). There was no difference in basal GH levels between the hyperglycemic and euglycemic clamps (2.9+/-0.99 mU/l versus 1.48+/-0.44 mU/l; P>0.05). Peak GH response to GHRH+GHRP-6 during the hyperglycemic clamp was lower than in the englycemic clamp (112.45+/-14.45 mU/l versus 151.06+/-16.87 mU/l; P<0.05). Area under the GH curve was lower in the hyperglycemic than in the euglycemic clamp (6974.49+/-1001.95 mU/l/min versus 9560.75+/-1140.65 mU/l/min; P<0.05). It is concluded that hyperglycemia significantly reduces GH response to combined administration of GHRH+GHRP-6 in normal weight patients with type 2 diabetes. It is suggested that ambient glucose levels should be taken into account during interpretation of GH response to combined administration of GHRH+GHRP-6 in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Growth hormone (GH) response to GH-releasing peptide-6 and GH-releasing hormone in normal-weight and overweight patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

The growth hormone (GH) response to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) was found to be either decreased or normal. The recent introduction of a new and potent GH stimulus, GH-releasing peptide-6 (GHRP-6), allowed further investigation of the functional properties of somatotropes in a variety of metabolic diseases. The aim of the present study was to investigate the response of GH to GHRP-6, GHRH, and GHRP-6 + GHRH in NIDDM patients. Twenty-one patients with NIDDM were divided into two groups: group A, normal weight (body mass index [BMI], 23.31+/-0.62 kg/m2); and group B, overweight (BMI, 27.62+/-0.72 kg/m2). Eight normal-weight control subjects (group C) were studied. Each subject received GHRP-6 (90 microg intravenously [i.v.]), GHRH (100 microg i.v.), and GHRP-6 + GHRH on three separate occasions. There was no difference between the GH response after GHRP-6 in groups A, B, and C in terms of the GH peak (50.95+/-11.55, 51.96+/-7.71, and 70.07+/-15.59 mU/L, P>.05) and the area under the curve (AUC) for GH (2,340.06+/-617.36, 2,684.54+/-560.57, 3,462.78+/-1,223.53 mU/L/120 min, P>.05). A decreased GH response to GHRH was found in group B in comparison to group A (B v A: peak GH response, 8.25+/-1.90 v 22.19+/-8.81, P<.05; AUC GH, 479.62+/-84.0 v 1,443.21+/-743.76, P<.05). There was no difference in the GH response between group A and group C (peak GH response, 22.19+/-8.81 v 26.42+/-6.71, P>.05; AUC, 1,443.21+/-743.76 v 1,476.51+/-386.56, P>.05). There was a significant difference between the same parameters in group B versus group C (8.25+/-1.90 v 26.42+/-6.71, P<.05; AUC, 479.62+/-84.0 v 1,476.51+/-386.56, P<.05). The combined administration of GHRP-6 + GHRH elicited a synergistic GH response in NIDDM patients and controls. There was a significant difference between groups A and B for the GH peak (96.49+/-9.80 v 68.38+/-8.25, P<.05), whereas there was no difference for the AUC (5,111.13+/-703.77 v 3,425.95+/-459.67, P>.05). There was no difference in the peak GH after the combined test between group A and group C (96.49+/-9.80 v 139.82+/-24.16, P>.05), whereas the peak GH in the same test was significantly decreased in group B in comparison to group C (68.38+/-8.25 v 139.82+/-24.16, P<.05). The AUC for GH after combined GHRP-6 + GHRH in group A versus group C was not significantly different (5,111.13+/-703.77 v 9,274.71+/-1,541.46, P>.05), whereas there was a significant difference for the same test between group B and group C (3,425.95+/-459.67 v 9,274.71+/-1,541.46, P<.05). Our results demonstrate that normal-weight NIDDM patients have a preserved GH response to GHRP-6, GHRH, and GHRP-6 + GHRH, and overweight NIDDM patients have a blunted response to GHRH and GHRP-6 + GHRH. The preserved GH response to GHRP-6 in both diabetic groups suggests that the secretory potential of somatotropes is preserved in NIDDM patients. The impairment of the GH response to GHRH in overweight NIDDM patients could be a functional defect due to the obesity, since it could be overridden by administration of GHRP-6.

Neuroendocrine control of growth hormone secretion

The secretion of growth hormone (GH) is regulated through a complex neuroendocrine control system, especially by the functional interplay of two hypothalamic hypophysiotropic hormones, GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) and somatostatin (SS), exerting stimulatory and inhibitory influences, respectively, on the somatotrope. The two hypothalamic neurohormones are subject to modulation by a host of neurotransmitters, especially the noradrenergic and cholinergic ones and other hypothalamic neuropeptides, and are the final mediators of metabolic, endocrine, neural, and immune influences for the secretion of GH. Since the identification of the GHRH peptide, recombinant DNA procedures have been used to characterize the corresponding cDNA and to clone GHRH receptor isoforms in rodent and human pituitaries. Parallel to research into the effects of SS and its analogs on endocrine and exocrine secretions, investigations into their mechanism of action have led to the discovery of five separate SS receptor genes encoding a family of G protein-coupled SS receptors, which are widely expressed in the pituitary, brain, and the periphery, and to the synthesis of analogs with subtype specificity. Better understanding of the function of GHRH, SS, and their receptors and, hence, of neural regulation of GH secretion in health and disease has been achieved with the discovery of a new class of fairly specific, orally active, small peptides and their congeners, the GH-releasing peptides, acting on specific, ubiquitous seven-transmembrane domain receptors, whose natural ligands are not yet known.

Pathophysiology of the neuroregulation of growth hormone secretion in experimental animals and the human

During the last decade, the GH axis has become the compelling focus of remarkably active and broad-ranging basic and clinical research. Molecular and genetic models, the discovery of human GHRH and its receptor, the cloning of the GHRP receptor, and the clinical availability of recombinant GH and IGF-I have allowed surprisingly rapid advances in our knowledge of the neuroregulation of the GH-IGF-I axis in many pathophysiological contexts. The complexity of the GHRH/somatostatin-GH-IGF-I axis thus commends itself to more formalized modeling (154, 155), since the multivalent feedback-control activities are difficult to assimilate fully on an intuitive scale. Understanding the dynamic neuroendocrine mechanisms that direct the pulsatile secretion of this fundamental growth-promoting and metabolic hormone remains a critical goal, the realization of which is challenged by the exponentially accumulating matrix of experimental and clinical data in this arena. To the above end, we review here the pathophysiology of the GHRH somatostatin-GH-IGF-I feedback axis consisting of corresponding key neurotransmitters, neuromodulators, and metabolic effectors, and their cloned receptors and signaling pathways. We propose that this system is best viewed as a multivalent feedback network that is exquisitely sensitive to an array of neuroregulators and environmental stressors and genetic restraints. Feedback and feedforward mechanisms acting within the intact somatotropic axis mediate homeostatic control throughout the human lifetime and are disrupted in disease. Novel effectors of the GH axis, such as GHRPs, also offer promise as investigative probes and possible therapeutic agents. Further understanding of the mechanisms of GH neuroregulation will likely allow development of progressively more specific molecular and clinical tools for the diagnosis and treatment of various conditions in which GH secretion is regulated abnormally. Thus, we predict that unexpected and enriching insights in the domain of the neuroendocrine pathophysiology of the GH axis are likely be achieved in the succeeding decades of basic and clinical research.

Glutamate decarboxylase autoimmunity and growth hormone secretion in type I diabetes mellitus

Insulin-dependent (type I) diabetic patients are known to have an exaggerated growth hormone (GH) response to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH), which is hypothesized to be due to a decrease in somatostatin tone. The aim of the study was to ascertain the influence of the presence and activity of the autoimmune process involving a key enzyme (glutamic acid decarboxylase [GAD]) in the synthetic pathway of a neurotransmitter regulating somatostatin secretion, ie, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), on the GH response to GHRH alone or combined with an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, pyridostigmine (PD), in patients with type I diabetes mellitus. Twenty non-obese type I diabetic patients and 17 normal subjects underwent an intravenous (IV) injection of 100 micrograms GHRH(1-29)NH2. Twelve of 20 diabetic subjects and all of the control subjects also underwent a second experimental procedure, administration of 120 mg oral PD 60 minutes before IV injection of 100 micrograms GHRH. Diabetic subjects with serum GAD antibody (GADA) levels more than 3 U (n = 10) showed significantly higher serum GH levels after GHRH injection as compared both with diabetic patients with GADA less than 3 U (n = 10) and with normal controls, whether expressed as absolute or peak values. GH peaks after GHRH were significantly (rs = .46, P < .05) correlated with the level of GADA in the whole population of type I diabetic subjects studied. PD significantly enhanced the GH response to GHRH, in terms of both absolute and peak values, in patients without GADA (n = 6) and in normal subjects. On the contrary, PD failed to enhance the GH response to GHRH in diabetic patients with GADA (n = 6). Our findings suggest that autoimmunity may play a key role in determining the exaggerated GH response to GHRH in type I diabetes mellitus. The mechanism underlying this effect is hypothesized to be the production of antibodies to GAD, a key enzyme in the synthesis of GABA, and in turn a reduced GABAergic stimulatory tone on somatostatin production at the hypothalamic level.

Hypothalamic control of growth hormone (GH) secretion in type I diabetic men: effect of the combined administration of GH-releasing hormone and hexarelin, a novel GHRP-6 analog

Insulin dependent (type I) diabetic patients show abnormal growth hormone (GH) secretion. Hexarelin is an analog of GHRP-6 which releases GH in part via somatostatin inhibition. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effects of hexarelin and GHRH, administered either alone or in combination, on GH secretion in 10 type I diabetic and 7 normal men. All the subjects were administered: 1) human GHRH (1-29) NH2 100 micrograms i.v. bolus at 0 min; 2) hexarelin 100 micrograms i.v. bolus at 0 min; 3) hexarelin 100 micrograms + hGHRH 100 micrograms i.v. bolus at 0 min. In type I diabetic patients significantly greater GH responses to GHRH and hexarelin have been observed with normal subjects. Hexarelin caused a significantly (p < 0.05) greater GH response as compared to GHRH in both diabetic and control subjects. After the administration of hexarelin+GHRH, a significant increase in both GH absolute and peak levels as compared to hexarelin or GHRH alone was found in all the subjects. However, the GH responses to the combined stimuli were not significantly different in diabetics as compared to normals; moreover, the interaction of GHRH and hexarelin was synergistic in controls and additive in diabetics. We hypothesize that a reduction in the hypothalamic somatostatin inhibitory tone combined with increased pituitary GH production may be responsible for the pattern of the GH responses to hexarelin and GHRH observed in our type I diabetic patients.

Growth Hormone neuroregulation in diabetes mellitus

GH secretion is markedly altered in diabetic rats and humans. Diabetes in the rat, whether occurring spontaneously or after streptozotocin administration, results in depressed GH secretion. This defect is likely caused by an increase in hypothalamic somatostatin tone and decreased pituitary GH. The effects of diabetes in humans depend upon the etiology of the disease. In type-1 diabetes, GH secretion is increased and in type 2 it is decreased. Again, these changes are hypothesized to be due to opposite alterations in hypothalamic somatostatin. Current evidence suggests that GH hypersecretion in human type-1 diabetes may be relevant to important metabolic and angiopathic complications of the disease.