Involvement of M1-muscarinic receptors in the excitation of neocortical neurones by acetylcholine

Muscarinic M1 Receptor Overstimulation Disrupts Working Memory Activity for Rules in Primate Prefrontal Cortex

Acetylcholine release in the prefrontal cortex (PFC), acting through muscarinic receptors, has an essential role in regulating flexible behavior and working memory (WM). General muscarinic receptor blockade disrupts PFC WM representations, while selective stimulation of muscarinic receptor subtypes is of great interest for the treatment of cognitive dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease. Here, we tested selective stimulation and blockade of muscarinic M1 receptors (M1Rs) in macaque PFC, during performance of a cognitive control task in which rules maintained in WM specified saccadic responses. We hypothesized that M1R blockade and stimulation would disrupt and enhance rule representation in WM, respectively. Unexpectedly, M1R blockade did not consistently affect PFC neuronal rule selectivity. Moreover, M1R stimulation suppressed PFC activity, and at higher doses, degraded rule representations. Our results suggest that, in primates, the deleterious effects of general muscarinic blockade on PFC WM activity are not mediated by M1Rs, while their overstimulation deteriorates PFC rule maintenance.

The distribution of muscarinic M1 receptors in the human hippocampus

The muscarinic M1 receptor plays a significant role in cognition, probably by modulating information processing in key regions such as the hippocampus. To understand how the muscarinic M1 receptor achieves these functions in the hippocampus, it is critical to know the distribution of the receptor within this complex brain region. To date, there are limited data on the distribution of muscarinic M1 receptors in the human hippocampus which may also be confounded because some anti-muscarinic receptor antibodies have been shown to lack specificity. Initially, using Western blotting and immunohistochemistry, we showed the anti-muscarinic M1 receptor antibody to be used in our study bound to a single 62kDa protein that was absent in mice lacking the muscarinic M1 receptor gene. Then, using immunohistochemistry, we determined the distribution of muscarinic M1 receptors in human hippocampus from 10 subjects with no discernible history of a neurological or psychiatric disorder. Our data shows the muscarinic M1 receptor to be predominantly on pyramidal cells in the hippocampus. Muscarinic M1 receptor positive cells were most apparent in the deep polymorphic layer of the dentate gyrus, the pyramidal cell layer of cornu ammonis region 3, the cellular layers of the subiculum, layer II of the presubiculum and layer III and V of the parahippocampal gyrus. Positive cells were less numerous and less intensely stained in the pyramidal layer of cornu ammonis region 2 and were sparse in the molecular layer of the dentate gyrus as well as cornu ammonis region 1. Although immunoreactivity was present in the granular layer of the dentate gyrus, it was difficult to identity individual immunopositive cells, possibly due to the density of cells. This distribution of the muscarinic M1 receptors in human hippocampus, and its localisation on glutamatergic cells, would suggest the receptor has a significant role in modulating excitatory hippocampal neurotransmission.

Evidence for an involvement of muscarinic cholinergic systems in the induction but not expression of behavioral sensitization to cocaine

The present study was designed to determine whether the muscarinic cholinergic antagonist scopolamine can prevent the expression and induction of sensitization to the locomotor-activating effects of cocaine. Rats received one daily injection of cocaine (20 mg/kg i.p.) for 5 days. Two days after withdrawal of pretreatment, rats were pretreated with scopolamine (3.0 mg/kg s.c) or its vehicle and challenged 15 min later with either saline or cocaine (20-30 mg/kg i.p.). In second set of experiments, scopolamine (3.0 mg/kg s.c) or its vehicle was given in combination with either saline or cocaine (20 mg/kg i.p.) for 5 days. Activity in response to saline and to cocaine (20 mg/kg i.p.) was assessed on day 7. The effects of acute administration of scopolamine (3.0 mg/kg s.c.) on cocaine-induced locomotor activity were also assessed. Acute administration of scopolamine increased both distance traveled and time spent in stereotypy. When scopolamine was administered 15 min prior to an acute injection of cocaine, a significant increase in the behavioral response to cocaine was seen. Daily injections of cocaine for 5 days produced sensitized behavioral responses to a subsequent cocaine challenge. Acute administration of scopolamine to animals preexposed and sensitized to cocaine did not disrupt the expression of sensitization to the locomotor and stereotypic effects of cocaine. In contrast, when scopolamine was given in combination with cocaine for 5 days, sensitization to the locomotor-activating effects of cocaine was prevented. These results suggest an important role of cholinergic muscarinic systems in mediating sensitization to the locomotor-activating effects of cocaine, which occurred after the repeated context-independent administration of this agent. In contrast, the enhanced stereotypic effects in response to the repeated administration of cocaine seem to be independent of alterations in muscarine cholinergic transmission.

The relative effects of selective M1 muscarinic antagonists on rapid eye movement sleep

Three muscarinic antagonists, scopolamine, trihexyphenidyl and biperiden were systemically administered (0, 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 mg/kg) in rats. Scopolamine increased wakefulness and deceased sleep, both slow wave and REM. Trihexyphenidyl increased wakefulness and decreased REM sleep while biperiden decreased REM sleep selectively. The rank order REM-suppressing effect was roughly scopolamine and trihexyphenidyl having a greater suppressing effect than biperiden. These results suggest that the regulation of the sleep-wake cycle is at least partially controlled by the M1 muscarinic receptor.

Muscarinic receptor agonist-mediated modulation of neuronal activity in rat cerebral cortex

Multiple cortical neuronal responses were elicited by the iontophoretic application of muscarinic receptor agonists and antagonists in the rat cerebral sensorimotor cortex in vivo. (1) The muscarinic receptor agonist, oxotremorine-M induced a biphasic effect on spontaneous firing. This was evident as an early brief increase in the firing rate over the spontaneous discharge followed by secondary inhibition of spontaneous activity. The excitation could be blocked by the muscarinic receptor non-selective antagonist atropine and by both the M1 receptor antagonist pirenzepine and the M2 receptor antagonists gallamine or methoctramine. Oxotremorine-M inhibition of spontaneous activity was not affected by the M1 receptor antagonist pirenzepine, while evaluation of its sensitivity to gallamine and methoctramine was not possible since these two M2 receptor antagonists also depressed spontaneous activity, unlike pirenzepine. Of the other two muscarinic receptor agonists, oxotremorine had inconsistent and weak excitatory effects whilst McN-A-343 had only weak excitatory or inhibitory effects on spontaneous activity. (2) Oxotremorine-M, oxotremorine and McN-A-343 had a depressant action on neuronal discharges evoked by glutamate or acetylcholine. A depressant effect of oxotremorine-M was also demonstrated on the early excitation evoked by subsequent applications of oxotremorine-M itself. Of the three muscarinic receptor agonists tested, oxotremorine-M was the most potent in evoking a long-term depression of evoked discharges, lasting from several minutes (greater than 5 min) to as long as 40 min. Oxotremorine-M-induced depression of evoked responses was most sensitive to the M2 receptor antagonists, whereas oxotremorine-induced depression was more sensitive to the M1 receptor antagonist pirenzepine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Activating the damaged basal forebrain cholinergic system: tonic stimulation versus signal amplification

The hypothesis that the cognitive decline in senile dementia is related to the loss of cortical cholinergic afferent projections predicts that pharmacological manipulations of the remaining cholinergic neurons will have therapeutic effects. However, treatment with cholinesterase inhibitors or muscarinic agonists has been, for the most part, largely unproductive. These drugs seem to disrupt the normal patterning of cholinergic transmission and thus may block proper signal processing. An alternative pharmacological strategy which focuses on the amplification of presynaptic activity without disrupting the normal patterning of cholinergic transmission appears to be more promising. Such a strategy may make use of the normal GABAergic innervation of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons in general, and in particular of the inhibitory hyperinnervation of remaining cholinergic neurons which may develop under pathological conditions. Disinhibition of the GABAergic control of cholinergic activity is assumed to intensify presynaptic cortical cholinergic activity and to enhance cognitive processing. Although the extent to which compounds such as the benzodiazepine receptor antagonist beta-carboline ZK 93,426 act via the basal forebrain GABA-cholinergic link is not yet clear, the available data suggest that the beneficial behavioral effects of this compound established in animals and humans are based on indirect cholinomimetic mechanisms. It is proposed that an activation of residual basal forebrain cholinergic neurons can be achieved most physiologically via inhibitory modulation of afferent GABAergic transmission. This modulation may have a therapeutic value in treating behavioral syndromes associated with cortical cholinergic denervation.

Effect of specific M1, M2 muscarinic receptor agonists on REM sleep generation

Specific agonists for muscarinic receptor subtypes were infused by microinjection into the medial pontine reticular formation of freely moving cats. The M2 agonists Oxotremorine-M and Cisdioxolane significantly increased REM sleep percentage. The results obtained with microinfusions of carbachol, a mixed muscarinic agonist, were similar to that obtained by the M2 agonists. The M1 agonist McN-A-343 did not elicit any change in sleep or REM sleep percentage. The generation of REM sleep by cholinergic stimulation of the medial pontine reticular formation may be mediated by the M2 muscarinic receptor subtype.