The reliability of differences between the hands in motor skill

Testing the relationship between lateralization on sequence-based motor tasks and language laterality using an online battery

ABSTRACTStudies have highlighted an association between motor laterality and speech production laterality. It is thought that common demands for sequential processing may underlie this association. However, most studies in this area have relied on relatively small samples and have infrequently explored the reliability of the tools used to assess lateralization. We, therefore, established the validity and reliability of an online battery measuring sequence-based motor laterality and language laterality before exploring the associations between laterality indices on language and motor tasks. The online battery was completed by 621 participants, 52 of whom returned to complete the battery a second time. The three motor tasks included in the battery showed good between-session reliability (r ≥ .78) and were lateralized in concordance with hand preference. The novel measure of speech production laterality was left lateralized at population level as predicted, but reliability was less satisfactory (r = .62). We found no evidence of an association between sequence-based motor laterality and language laterality. Those with a left-hand preference were more strongly lateralized on motor tasks requiring midline crossing; this effect was not observed in right-handers. We conclude that there is little evidence of the co-lateralization of language and sequence-based motor skill on this battery.

Working Memory Capacity of Biological Motion's Basic Unit: Decomposing Biological Motion From the Perspective of Systematic Anatomy

Many studies have shown that about three biological motions (BMs) can be maintained in working memory. However, no study has yet analyzed the difficulties of experiment materials used, which partially affect the ecological validity of the experiment results. We use the perspective of system anatomy to decompose BM, and thoroughly explore the influencing factors of difficulties of BMs, including presentation duration, joints to execute motions, limbs to execute motions, type of articulation interference tasks, and number of joints and planes involved in the BM. We apply the change detection paradigm supplemented by the articulation interference task to measure the BM working memory capacity (WMC) of participants. Findings show the following: the shorter the presentation duration, the less participants remembered; the more their wrist moved, the less accurate their memory was; repeating verbs provided better results than did repeating numerals to suppress verbal encoding; the more complex the BM, the less participants remembered; and whether the action was executed by the handed limbs did not affect the WMC. These results indicate that there are many factors that can be used to adjust BM memory load. These factors can help sports psychology professionals to better evaluate the difficulty of BMs, and can also partially explain the differences in estimations of BM WMC in previous studies.

Evaluation des bénéfices d’un dispositif d’entraînement à l’usage des doigts en mathématiques

Numerous studies have shown a significant positive relationship between the mental representation of hands in young children and their calculation performance. The literature indicates that certain components of manual motor skills may be critical to the quality of this relationship. The main objective of this study is to measure the benefit of an explicit training and teaching device for finger use in mathematics by measuring the initial motor imitation abilities of young children. A protocol of pretest, training, and post-test type was proposed to 101 children with an average age of 5 years and 3 months. Measurements focused on manual motor skills and arithmetical skills. The 12-week classroom-based device was designed to develop manual motor skills and explicitly teach finger use in mathematics. The results indicate that significant progress was made in arithmetic for the students who benefited from the training. Interestingly this progress is modulated by the children’s initial motor imitation skills. This contribution opens up new research and application perspectives on the relationships between mental motor imagery, fine motor skills, and arithmetic ability.

Different laterality indexes are poorly correlated with one another but consistently show the tendency of males and females to be more left- and right-lateralized, respectively

The most common way to assess handedness is based on the preferred hand for writing, leading to a binary (left or right) trait. Handedness can also be assessed as a continuous trait with laterality indexes, but these are not time- and cost-effective, and are not routinely collected. Rarely, different handedness measures are collected for the same individuals. Here, we assessed the relationship of preferred hand for writing with four laterality indexes, reported in previous literature, derived from measures of dexterity (pegboard task, marking squares and sorting matches) and strength (grip strength), available in a range of N = 6664-8069 children from the ALSPAC cohort. Although all indexes identified a higher proportion of individuals performing better with their right hand, they showed low correlation with each other (0.08-0.3). Left handers were less consistent compared to right handers in performing better with their dominant hand, but that varied across indexes, i.e. 13% of left handers performed better with their right hand on marking squares compared to 48% for sorting matches and grip strength. Analysis of sex effects on the laterality indexes showed that males and females tend to be, on all measures, more left- and right-lateralized, respectively. Males were also over-represented among the individuals performing equally with both hands suggesting they had a higher tendency to be weakly lateralized. This study shows that different handedness measures tap into different dimensions of laterality and cannot be used interchangeably. The trends observed across indexes for males and females suggest that sex effects should be taken into account in handedness and laterality studies.

Tapping Speed Asymmetry in Drummers for Single-Hand Tapping with a Stick

The purpose of this study was to investigate tapping speed asymmetry in 13 right-handed drummers and 13 right-handed nondrummers. The participants executed single-hand tapping with a stick as fast as possible for 10 sec. with the left and right hand. There was no significant difference in the tapping speed of the right hand between the drummers and the nondrummers, whereas in the left hand, the drummers tapped significantly faster than the nondrummers. Drummers showed less tapping speed asymmetry than nondrummers. These results suggest that the tapping speed of the nonpreferred hand progressed nearly to the level of the preferred hand through daily drum training.

Prolonged Practice of a Simple Motor Task by Preferred and Nonpreferred Hands

After prolonged practice (1300 10-sec trials) the tapping speed of the nonpreferred hand reached that of the preferred hand on a simple finger-tapping task. Analysis of the intertap intervals showed the variability of the duration of intertap intervals was smaller for the preferred than for the nonpreferred hand; the difference was not affected by the prolonged practice for N = 1.

Accommodation to Increased Accuracy Demands by the Right and Left Hands

This study was designed to identify the phase of rapid aimed movements responsible for hand differences in motor skill, and to evaluate potential differences between the hands in accommodating to greater accuracy demands. In both experiments, an accelerometer mounted on a stylus allowed key changes in acceleration to be used to partition the movement into phases. In Experiment 1, slower left hand movement times were attributable primarily to a terminal homing-in phase, especially as target size decreased. Since error rates varied as a function of hand and target size, speed-accuracy trade-offs may have occurred. Experiment 2 rigidly controlled error rate and confirmed the major hand difference to occur in the latter phase of the movement where error correction is presumed. Although less pronounced, adjustments were made in the earlier movement phases as well. Accommodation to greater accuracy demands involved moving the stylus closer to the target before decelerating to engage in error correction. This adjustment to gain enhanced precision was more pronounced in the left hand.

Associations between handedness and cerebral lateralisation for language: a comparison of three measures in children

It has been known for many years that hand preference is associated with cerebral lateralisation for language, but the relationship is weak and indirect. It has been suggested that quantitative measures of differential hand skill or reaching preference may provide more valid measures than traditional inventories, but to date these have not been validated against direct measures of cerebral lateralisation. We investigated the associations of three different handedness assessments; 1) a hand preference inventory, 2) a measure of relative hand skill, and 3) performance on a reaching task; with cerebral lateralisation for language function as derived from functional transcranial Doppler ultrasound during a language production task, in a group of 57 typically developing children aged from 6 to 16 years. Significant correlations between cerebral lateralisation for language production and handedness were found for a short version of the inventory and for performance on the reaching task. However, confidence intervals for the correlations overlapped and no one measure emerged as clearly superior to the others. The best handedness measures accounted for only 8–16% of the variance in cerebral lateralisation. These findings indicate that researchers should not rely on handedness as an indicator of cerebral lateralisation for language. They also imply that lateralisation of language and motor functions in the human brain show considerable independence from one another.

The relation between handedness indices and reproductive success in a non-industrial society

The evolution of handedness in human populations has intrigued scientists for decades. However, whether handedness really affects Darwinian fitness is unclear and not yet studied in a non-industrial society where selection pressures on health and handedness are likely to be similar to the situation in which handedness has evolved. We measured both hand preference and asymmetry of hand skill (speed of fine motor control, measured by a pegboard task, and accuracy of throwing), as they measure different aspects of handedness. We investigated the associations between both the direction (left versus right) and strength (the degree to which a certain preference or asymmetry in skill is manifested, independent of the direction) of handedness. We analyzed to what extent these measures predict the number of offspring and self-reported illness in a non-industrial society in Papua, Indonesia. As it is known that body height and fitness are correlated, data on body height was also collected. Due to low numbers of left-handers we could not investigate the associations between direction of hand preference and measures of Darwinian fitness. We found a positive association between strength of asymmetry of hand skill (pegboard) and the number of children men sired. We also found a positive association for men between strength of hand preference and number of children who died within the first three years of life. For women we found no such effects. Our results may indicate that strength of handedness, independent of direction, has fitness implications and that the persistence of the polymorphism in handedness may be ascribed to either balancing selection on strength of asymmetry of hand skill versus strength of hand preference, or sexual antagonistic selection. No relationships between health and handedness were found, perhaps due to disease related selective disappearance of subjects with a specific handedness.

Is a cerebellar deficit the underlying cause of reading disabilities?

This study investigated whether children with dyslexia differed in their performance on reading, phonological, rapid naming, motor, and cerebellar-related tasks and automaticity measures compared to reading age (RA)-matched and chronological age (CA)-matched control groups. Participants were 51 children attending mainstream English elementary schools in Quebec. All participants completed measures of IQ, word and nonword reading fluency, elision, nonword decoding, rapid naming, bead threading, peg moving, toe tapping, postural stability, and muscle tone. Results from both group contrasts and analyses at the individual case level did not provide support for claims of motor-cerebellar involvement in either typical or atypical reading acquisition. Results were more consistent with a phonological core process account of both typical reading and reading difficulty. Phonological deficits for children with dyslexia compared to RA-matched controls were, however, only evident in group contrasts. Findings thus also have important implications for identifying at-risk readers among their same-aged peers.

Plasticity of lateralization: schooling predicts hand preference but not hand skill asymmetry in a non-industrial society

Considerable variation in the frequency of left-handedness between cultures has been reported, ranging from 0.5 to 24%. This variation in hand preference may have evolved under natural or cultural selection. It has been suggested that schooling affects handedness but as in most human societies only a selected and minor part of the population does not attend school this is difficult to test. We investigated to what extent schooling affects both hand preference and asymmetry in hand skill in a non-industrial population in the highlands of New Guinea. This provided unique opportunities because of the relatively recent establishment of a primary school in this population, and where people still live a non-industrial traditional life reflecting conditions in which handedness may have evolved. We interviewed 620 inhabitants (aged 5-70 y) to collect demographic data and school history, tested hand preference on 10 ecologically relevant activities, and measured performance of each hand on three tasks (pegboard, grip force, ball throwing). Schooled individuals were overall faster in fine motor performance, had greater grip strength and greater throwing accuracy. This suggests that there is implicit selection on the fitter part of the population to enter school. Schooling is associated with hand preference, as schooled individuals were more likely to be extremely right-handed and less likely to be strongly right-handed, but not with asymmetry of hand skill (controlled for sex and age). Developmental plasticity in hand preference but not skill asymmetry, and the weak correlations between hand preference and hand skill asymmetry indicate that they represent different aspects of brain lateralization. Furthermore, the weak correlations between hand preference and hand skill asymmetry leave room for moderating factors such as schooling, sex and age to have a differential effect on hand preference and hand skill, and each needs to be studied in its own right.

Unimanual and Bimanual Simultaneous Fingertapping in Schoolchildren: Developmental Aspects and Hand Preference-related Asymmetries

Computerised analysis of finger tapping was performed in 233 normal 5- to 12-year-old children whose hand preference was assessed with six demonstration actions. Performance with both hands became more rapid with age when tapping unimanually or simultaneously in phase with two hands as quickly as possible. There were no differences between the sexes. Performance with both hands also acquired more tapping regularity with age during unimanual tapping, whereas only the left hand did so during bimanual tapping. There was no age effect on the dexterity (speed) difference between unimanually tapping hands, nor on the relative time lag and the degree of synchrony between the hands in bimanual tapping. The degree of synchrony, however, becomes more stable in older children. The more righthanded children are, the faster the right hand is in unimanual tapping, and the more the right hand is ahead of the left hand during bimanual tapping. However, there is a right shift for both of these variables which makes them poor predictors of hand preference. These results suggest that there is a strong bias towards the right hand in complete righthanders as well as--to a lesser extent--in all others, which might be connected to the leading role of the left hemisphere for the performance aspects of hand motor function under study.

Intrinsic constraint of asymmetry acting as a control parameter on rapid, rhythmic bimanual coordination: a study of professional drummers and nondrummers

Expert musicians show experience-dependent reduced asymmetry in the structure of motor-related brain areas and in the maximum tapping frequency between the hands. Therefore we hypothesized that a reduced hand-skill asymmetry is strongly related to rapid and rhythmical bimanual coordination and developed a dynamical model including a symmetry-breaking parameter Δω, for human bimanual coordination. We conducted unimanual and bimanual drumming experiments to test the following model predictions. 1) The asymmetry in the maximum tapping frequency is more pronounced in nondrummers than that in drummers. If so, 2) a larger number of phase wanderings (i.e., succession of taps by the same hand), 3) larger SD of the relative phase between the hands (SD ), and 4) larger deviation of mean relative phase (mean ) from 180° would be observed in nondrummers than that in professional drummers during antiphase bimanual drumming at the maximum speed. In a unimanual tapping task, the asymmetry in maximum tapping frequency of nondrummers was more pronounced than that of professional drummers. In a bimanual coordination task, phase wanderings were observed only in nondrummers and SD of the nondrummers is significantly larger than that of professional drummers. On the other hand, there was no significant difference between the mean of the two groups. All these observations were successfully reproduced by changing Δω, which corresponded to the asymmetry in the maximum tapping frequency. These results support the hypothesis indicating that the prominent bimanual coordination pattern emerges spontaneously after a nonspecific change in Δω or symmetry restoration of the nonlinear dynamical systems.

Motor control in children with ADHD and non-affected siblings: deficits most pronounced using the left hand

BACKGROUND

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is strongly influenced by heritability. Identifying heritable vulnerability traits (endophenotypes) that mark a relatively high risk of developing the disorder can contribute to the identification of risk genes. A fruitful area for the search for such endophenotypes may be motor control in children with ADHD, since the disorder is frequently accompanied by motor problems.

METHOD

The current study used a large sample of 350 children with ADHD, 195 non-affected siblings and 271 normal controls aged 5-19 years. Children were administered two computerised motor control tasks in which they had to trace a path between two circles (Tracking task) and follow a randomly moving target (Pursuit task). Both tasks were performed with both the right and the left hand.

RESULTS

Children with ADHD were less precise and stable than controls. Non-affected siblings also deviated from controls, but only on the Tracking task. Group differences were modulated by the use of the right versus the left hand: no group differences emerged when the right hand was used, yet group differences did emerge when the left hand was used. Performance on both tasks was significantly familial.

CONCLUSIONS

Imprecision and instability of movements in children with ADHD and in their non-affected siblings as measured by the Tracking task might be suitable endophenotypic candidates: these deficits are familially present in children having ADHD as well as in their non-affected siblings. Motor performance might be best assessed in children using their left hand, because motor control deficits are most pronounced using the left hand. This might relate to right hemispheric brain pathology in children with ADHD (and possibly in their non-affected siblings) that is related to the control of the left hand and/or relate to differential effects of daily life practice on both hands, which may be smaller on the left hand.

Extensive training of elementary finger tapping movements changes the pattern of motor cortex excitability

There is evidence of a strong capacity for functional and structural reorganization in the human motor system. However, past research has focused mainly on complex movement sequences over rather short training durations. In this study we investigated changes in corticospinal excitability associated with longer training of elementary, maximum-speed tapping movements. All participating subjects were consistent right-handers and were trained using either the right (experiment 1) or the left thumb (experiment 2). Transcranial magnetic stimulation was applied to obtain motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle of the right and the left hand before and after training. As a result of training, a significant increase was observed in tapping speed accompanied by increased MEPs, recorded from the trained APB muscle, following contralateral M1 stimulation. In the case of subdominant-hand training we additionally demonstrate increased MEP amplitudes evoked at the right APB (untrained hand) in the first training week. Enhanced corticospinal excitability associated with practice of elementary movements may constitute a necessary precursor for inducing plastic changes within the motor system. The involvement of the ipsilateral left M1 likely reflects the predominant role of the left M1 in the general control (modification) of simple motor parameters in right-handed subjects.

Postural Stability and Hand Preference as Constraints on One-Handed Catching Performance in Children

Effects of postural state and hand preference as constraints on 1-handed catching performance were investigated in different ability groups of children aged 9-10 years. On the basis of pretest data, the authors classified 48 participants into groups of good, intermediate, and poor catchers (n = 16 in each) and asked them to perform 1-handed catches with their preferred and nonpreferred hands while standing and sitting. The good catchers' performance was not affected by the imposed postural constraints but did improve when they used the preferred hand. A similar effect of hand preference was evident in the intermediate and poor catchers, but there was also an effect of postural constraint. Independent of hand preference, intermediate catchers' performance while seated improved significantly compared with that during standing. For poor catchers, there was an interaction between hand preference and posture; significant improvement was evident only when they used the preferred hand in the sitting condition. The finding that manipulation of posture and hand preference affected performance outcomes indicates that perceptual skill is not the only influence on catching performance in children. Manipulation of those key constraints may facilitate the acquisition of catching skill, but more research is needed to determine the permanence of those effects.

Quantifying hand preference using a behavioural continuum

Bishop, Ross, Daniels, and Bright (1996) proposed a novel approach to quantifying hand preference (QHP) using a single behavioural measure. The extent to which individuals used their dominant hand to reach across the midline to pick up cards discriminated subgroups of right-handers, similarly categorised by their scores on the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory. This study aimed to investigate whether (1) the QHP approach was able to differentiate subgroups within the left-handed as well as right-handed populations, (2) left-handers behave like mirror-image right-handers, and (3) if interacting with the environment in extrapersonal space is influenced by the level of fine motor skill demanded by the task. Results support the use of the QHP to discriminate subgroups of both left- and right-handers, particularly when the task demands very fine motor skill or very little. Left-handers behaved as mirror-images of the right-handers except when performing the unskilled motor task in which they showed greater readiness to use the nonpreferred hand. These results suggest that interaction with the environment in extrapersonal space may be a key factor contributing to manual dominance and that the lateralisation of fine motor skill interacts with this attentional bias.

Hand skill and hand preference in blind and sighted children

Congenitally blind and sighted blindfold children between the ages of 6 and 15 years were compared with each other for hand preferences and hand ability. All the children performed a 20-item hand preference test and every child performed three hand ability tasks: a sorting task, a finger dexterity task, and the Minnesota rate of manipulation task, each separately with the left and the right hand. Results indicated no differences between the hand preferences of the two groups. The sighted children were faster than the blind children on some of the hand ability tasks. There were no differences between the left and right hands for any of the tasks for either group. Results indicate an equipotentiality between the hands and suggest the possibility of training both hands during development on tasks that require tactile ability.

Predicting hand preference with performance on motor tasks

Handedness may be defined as preference or hand-differences in task performance. The strength and significance of the relationship between hand preference and hand performance asymmetries have been contested. To evaluate this relationship, we administered the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory and measured asymmetries in finger tapping, Purdue Pegboard, and grip strength in 30 subjects who prefer their right hand and 30 subjects who prefer their left hand. Hand asymmetries in finger tapping, Purdue Pegboard, and grip strength each predicted hand preference scores. However, a multiple regression equation best predicted hand preference by using performance of each task. Hand asymmetries in finger tapping correlated strongly with asymmetries in Purdue Pegboard performance, but neither of these asymmetries correlated strongly with asymmetries in grip strength. These findings indicate that hand preference and asymmetries in motor proficiency are strongly related, but suggest that preference and proficiency for different aspects of motor performance may be independently lateralized.

Hand preference and transcranial magnetic stimulation asymmetry of cortical motor representation

Human handedness may be associated with asymmetry in the corticospinal motor system. Previous studies measuring the threshold for eliciting motor evoked potentials (MEPs) to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) have provided evidence consistent with this hypothesis. However, TMS asymmetry observed in previous studies may have reflected cortical or spinal differences. We therefore undertook this investigation to test the hypothesis that handedness is associated with asymmetry in cortical motor representations. We used TMS to map contralateral cortical motor representations of the right and left abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and flexor carpi radialis (FCR) muscles in nine normal subjects (three left-handed). Using focal stimulation with a figure-of-8 shaped magnetic coil, we found no differences in MEP threshold or MEP size between the preferred and the nonpreferred hand. However, we observed that the number of scalp stimulation sites eliciting MEPs was statistically greater for APB and FCR muscles of the preferred limb. We found significant asymmetry between right-handed and left-handed subjects, such that in right-handers, the representation of the right APB was larger than that of the left APB, but in left-handers the representation of right APB was smaller than that of the left APB. These results suggest that handedness is associated with asymmetry in cortical motor representation.

Handedness and lexical skills in undergraduates

The right shift (RS) theory of handedness and cerebral dominance (Annett, 1972, 1985) suggested that individual differences for patterns of cerebral dominance may be associated with different types of risk to cognitive functions. The higher prevalence of dextrality than sinistrality in humans depends on a single gene (RS+) which facilitates left hemisphere specialisation for speech but at the expense of some right hemisphere function (Annett, 1992b; Kilshaw and Annett, 1983). RS-- genotypes have random asymmetries for hand and brain while RS++ genotypes have strong right shift. Three samples of undergraduates were given tests of phonological processing and of real word homophone discrimination. As predicted, phonology was poor in comparison with homophone discrimination toward the left of the laterality continuum while the reverse was true to the right of the continuum. When groups with specific difficulty for each type of test in comparison with the other were distinguished, those with poor phonology were less dextral and those with poor homophone discrimination were more dextral for hand preference than the rest of the sample. Siblings differed for handedness also, consistent with the argument for a genetic influence.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals a hemispheric asymmetry correlate of intermanual differences in motor performance

Hemispheric asymmetries in the threshold for eliciting motor evoked potentials (MEPs) with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are associated with hand preference. We posited that hemispheric asymmetries in TMS thresholds may be strongly correlated with some hand-differences in motor performance. MEPs result from the activation of neuronal networks targeting large cortical motoneurons. Thus, MEP thresholds might reflect physiological features of the corticospinal motor system. Considering the role of corticospinal pathways in the control of independent finger movement, we hypothesized that MEP thresholds would better predict speed and dexterity than strength. In 30 right-handers and 30 left-handers, we correlated right and left hand-differences in the threshold for eliciting MEPs with hand-differences in the performance of three manual tasks: finger-tapping speed, pegboard dexterity, and grip strength. Correlations of hand-differences in TMS thresholds with hand-differences in performance indicated that a lower TMS threshold for one hand is strongly associated with greater ability with that hand. The correlations of hand-differences in TMS thresholds with hand-differences in finger-tapping and pegboard dexterity were significantly larger than the correlation of hand-differences in TMS thresholds with hand-differences in grip strength. Our results indicate that hemispheric asymmetries in MEP thresholds may have functional significance related to basic parameters of movement. These results are consistent with the critical role of the corticospinal motor system in the control of independent finger movement. Furthermore, they imply that asymmetry in the corticospinal motor system may be an important substrate for asymmetries in hand preference and performance.

Variable presentation of cerebrovascular disease in monovular twins

We describe twin girls with bilateral cerebrovascular disease. In one child, a diagnosis of moyamoya disease was made after presentation in infancy with an acute hemiparesis; her asymptomatic sibling was found to have significant bilateral cerebrovascular disease after neuropsychological evaluation and assessment with transcranial Doppler ultrasound. Both subjects showed a discrepancy between verbal and performance IQ and deficits on a test of frontal-lobe function suggesting that these domains should be targeted in cognitive assessment. Family members of subjects with moyamoya are at risk of cerebrovascular disease. Clinical symptoms do not reliably predict disease and those at risk should be offered screening with non-invasive vascular imaging.

Hand skill asymmetry in professional musicians

Hand skill asymmetry on two handedness tasks was examined in consistent right-handed musicians and nonmusicians as well as mixed-handed and consistent left-handed nonmusicians. Musicians, although demonstrating right-hand superiority, revealed a lesser degree of hand skill asymmetry than consistent right-handed nonmusicians. Increased left-hand skill in musicians accounted for their reduced asymmetry. Musicians predominantly playing keyboard instruments demonstrated superior tapping performance than musicians playing predominantly string instruments, although they did not differ with respect to hand skill asymmetry. Since the diminished tapping asymmetry in musicians was related to early commencement but not duration of musical training, results are interpreted as an adaptation process due to performance requirements interacting with cerebral maturation during childhood.

The Specificity of Motor Skill and Manual Asymmetry: A Review of the Evidence and Its Implications

Results of investigations on gaining control of limb movements are reviewed, and their contribution to understanding the development of manual asymmetries is discussed in relation to the discrimination and programming of appropriate neuromuscular resources. An examination of the relevant evidence on number and types of manual asymmetries recorded provides strong grounds for concluding that where asymmetries occur, they simply represent a further example of the well-documented activity-specific nature of motor skills and of the extremely lengthy periods of learning or experience needed for their acquisition and perfection. This specificity of motor skill and manual asymmetry also readily accounts for most of the discrepancy usually reported between assessments of hand preference and performance differences between hands, because these alternative measures of handedness have rarely employed the same range or variety of tasks.

Lateralized spatial strategies in oscillating drawing movements

Kinematic characteristics and lateral differences between two upper extremities were investigated in a unimanual graphic task involving fast and precise oscillating movements on the vertical plane. The spatial locations of sequential reversal points were used to calculate the pairs of angles, relative to the horizontal axis. The point biserial coefficient of correlation was used to analyze the difference between big and large angles and their sequence in each pair. Three main groups (A, B, and C) of performance models were distinguished in 132 tests by 33 strongly right-handed male subjects. Group A showed strong variation in vertical movement, Group B covariation in vertical and horizontal vectors, while Group C reflected independent variation of both vertical and horizontal directions. It is suggested that the movement strategies might reflect three different models of motor control involving coupling of an oscillator controlling pools of motoneurons which regulates horizontal movements with an oscillator controlling vertical movement (Groups A + B) or with nonoscillating control signal (Group B). It is argued that Group A represents the simplest strategy and only performance Type A met by the left hand.

Actigraphic evaluation of handedness

The utility of an objective evaluation of motor activity, actigraphy, was examined in the evaluation of handedness. Hand preference was assessed in a homogeneous group of 190 young volunteers using the Edinburgh Inventory (EI). The EI distribution obtained in the population studied was comparable with distributions cited in the literature. Simultaneous actigraphic recordings from both wrists were made in 58 of these subjects for 20 h, starting at 1000 h, using an epoch length of 4 s. Care was taken to include comparable numbers of right- and left-handers (based on EI score) in this subgroup. Two actigraphic parameters were defined. One of these, the Activity Index (AI[x]), is a measure of the difference in total motor activity between right and left wrist. The other, Movement Index (MIy[x]) is a measure of the difference in movement pattern. AI[x] showed a moderate but significant correlation with EI (r = 0.36, P < 0.005). The correlation between MIy[x] and EI was high (r = 0.65, P < 0.0001). Rebinning of the data into 60 s epochs decreased the degree of linear correlation between MIy[x] and EI. We conclude, in contrast to a previous study, that actigraphy can be used to discriminate between dominant and non-dominant hands; that the difference in movement pattern between right and left hand is larger than the difference in total motor activity; and that epoch lengths shorter than the conventional 60 s are more sensitive for this kind of discrimination.

Five tests of hand skill

Four group tests of hand skill, square marking (SQUARES), dotting between targets (DOTS), line drawing between targets (LINES) and punching holes through targets (HOLES), were given to samples of undergraduates and schoolchildren, most of whom were also tested individually on a peg moving task (PEGS). Findings for PEGS were shown to be comparable to those of previous samples. Each new task was compared with PEGS for a standard measure of hand skill asymmetry (R-L%) using 4 criteria of comparison. For 3 criteria there was good agreement: correlations were statistically significant, hand preference subgroups were similar for rank order and the extent of asymmetry was more strongly associated with left hand scores than with right hand scores. This last finding was true for all of 12 comparisons for differing tests and samples, indicating that the finding is unlikely to be an artefact of score transformations as suggested by Bishop (1990a, 1990b). The fourth criterion of comparison, the distribution of R-L% scores, differed between the tasks. All of the new tasks found larger differences between the hands than PEGS. Whereas the shape of the distribution was unimodal for PEGS, as in previous studies, the distributions for DOTS and HOLES were clearly bimodal. Possible reasons for the larger between hand differences for some tasks are considered. It is suggested that the main difference between PEGS (and also to a lesser extent LINES) in comparison with DOTS and HOLES lies in the demand characteristics of the testing situation. Tasks which merely invite subjects to mark as many targets as possible in a unit of time may underestimate the skill of the nonpreferred hand.

The measurement of handedness: a cross-cultural comparison of samples from England and Papua New Guinea

Handedness was compared in 125 English children and 185 young people from Papua New Guinea (PNG). Many of the latter were unfamiliar with implements such as pencils and spoons. The PNG subjects showed strong hand preferences, usually for the right, and on some items were more consistent in hand use than the English subjects. However, they had smaller hand differences on peg-moving and tapping than the English children. A factor analysis identified one factor with high loadings from items involving precise motor control, and another with positive loadings from only card-dealing, block-building and threading. The first factor was impervious to cultural influences, whereas the second showed considerable cultural variation.

Interhemispheric differences in the planning and execution of sequences of skilled finger movements

An index-middle finger (double) tapping task was used to examine hemispheric differences in the planning and execution of skilled finger movements. In two experiments, subjects responded to a simple cue presented tachistoscopically in the left or right visual field, by performing a predetermined number of double taps, (between one and eight inclusive), with either the left or right hand. Reaction times (RT) increased linearly as a function of increasing number of taps, when response sequences were controlled by the left hemisphere. In contrast, an inverse quadratic trend was obtained with right hemisphere control. When both hemispheres were involved in the stimulus-response sequence, the latency function incorporated elements of both trends, suggesting interaction between the hemispheres. The RT trends reflect differences in motor planning between the hemispheres. The conditions engaging only the right or left hemispheres did not differ in motor execution, as measured by tapping duration, variability or errors. However, when both hemispheres were involved there was evidence of interaction, which was evident as interference when the right visual field or left hemisphere was cued but the motor response was under the control of the right hemisphere (left hand). Overall, the results indicate that hand differences in fine motor skill may be determined by hemispheric differences associated with motor preparation rather than response execution.

Recovery of elbow function in voluntary positioning of the hand following hemiplegia due to stroke

Elbow movement during voluntary positioning of the hand (with the arm supported against gravity) is described in a longitudinal study of five patients recovering from hemiplegia due to stroke. Over a twelve month period, four of the patients improved their speed of movement, three exhibiting slightly better recovery of elbow extension, one of flexion. In some instances co-contraction of the elbow agonist and antagonist (measured just before the onset of movement) decreased with time after stroke. The effects of contrasting movements at the shoulder on elbow movement were also studied. Estimates of recovery were generally similar whether patients kept the shoulder still or made movements that were synergic or counter-synergic to those of the elbow.

Arithmetic and laterality

Relationships between arithmetic ability, hand preference and hand skill were investigated in a general population sample of schoolchildren, aged 9-11 years. Incidences of non-right-handedness were highest in the children best at arithmetic and fell progressively through average and below average groups. Strong effects were found for hand skill; level of ability declined linearly from left to right across the R-L continuum in both sexes. Strong dextrality was associated with poor left hand skill and not superior right hand skill. Arithmetic ability was positively associated with left hand skill but not with right hand skill.

Crossing the midline by four to eight year old children

In Experiment 1 children (Kinder, 4-5 yr; Prep, 5-6 yr; Grade 1, 6-7 yr; Grade 2, 7-8 yr) bisected horizontal lines placed to the left, right or across the midline. The youngest groups displayed symmetrical neglect, erring to the left with the left hand and to the right with the right, the adult pattern of leftwards error not appearing until about Grade 2. However, while Prep, Grade 1 and Grade 2 sinistrals showed bigger between-hand differences than dextrals, this was not, unlike an earlier study, true of the youngest Kinder group, and symmetrical neglect did not appear to be peculiar to young sinistrals. A timed peg-moving task in Experiment II showed that performance did not slow when crossing the midline; nor did young sinistrals perform better with centrifugal abductive movement. These and other findings were incompatible with the idea of callosal immaturity in young sinistrals.

Lateral preference and skill in dyslexics: implications of the right shift theory

The lateral preferences and L-R skill of 109 male and 20 female dyslexics were as expected if the distribution of lateral asymmetry is shifted less far to the right in dyslexics than in controls. Several aspects of the data were consistent with Annett's hypothesis that some dyslexics lack the left hemisphere speech-organising factor postulated by the right shift theory of handedness and that this would be sufficient to account for the proportion of affected relatives. Some dyslexics were strongly dextral and these differed from the less dextral cases in several ways which resembled the distinction between backward and retarded readers.

Comparing different measures of laterality: do they relate to a single mechanism?

In the present study, a total of 126 adults were given three dichotic tasks, two half-field tasks, a peg-board task, several tapping tasks, the dynamometer, and a handedness questionnaire. A hierarchical cluster analysis was carried out on the matrix of product-moment correlations of laterality scores for all possible pairs of tasks. This analysis suggested that the laterality scores fall into three clusters: auditory (dichotic listening) scores, visual (half-field) scores, and manual (performance) scores. Canonical correlation analysis showed that these clusters must be considered to be independent of each other. The results are discussed with respect to the traditional interpretation of the concept of laterality. It is suggested that laterality phenomena may be dissociated and that this possibility deserves more attention.

The contribution of the thumb to reaching movements

Transport of the hand towards an object and the formation of grasp are logically separable components of reaching. It has been suggested that, although the two components must be temporally co-ordinated, their spatial parameters are under the control of independent visuo-motor channels. A case study of reaching by a proficient user of a manually-operated artificial hand is presented. A pattern of natural hand usage was observed in which the index finger rather than the thumb was responsible for reduction of grasp aperture as the hand approached an object. The same pattern of usage was also observed in the artificial hand even though the mechanics of that hand make it no easier to move the finger than the thumb. This suggests that the relative stability of the thumb in the natural hand is determined, not simply by anatomy, but by a role in guiding the transport component of reaching. At least part of the spatial aspect of grasp formation is closely related to the transport component of reaching and this is evidence against theories postulating two independent visuo-motor channels controlling the spatial parameters of grasp and transport.

Mathematical ability and lateral asymmetry

The hypothesis that special ability in mathematics is associated with a reduction in bias to dextral preference and skill was examined in several samples of students and in 97 male and 27 female teachers of mathematics, mainly in Universities and Polytechnics. The math students and math teachers differed from controls, both general and academic, in the direction predicted and several comparisons were statistically significant. Differences were in most cases clearer for males than females. An analysis of the findings in relation to the right shift (RS) theory of handedness (Annett, 1972, 1978) suggests that the incidence of left preference and skill is slightly raised in mathematicians not because of any intrinsic advantage of left preference but rather because extreme bias to the right, as expected in those carrying a hypothesised rs++ genotype, is disadvantageous for mathematical thinking. If the role of mathematics can be regarded as one of developing languages to describe those aspects of human experience which otherwise could be understood only in visuo-spatial images, it can be seen to require a coordination of those aspects of human intelligence which have been distinguished as depending differentially on the left and right cerebral hemispheres. The present findings suggest that this process might be impeded by a double dose of a gene which promotes left hemisphere language specialisation.

"Optimal" lateralization on the Tapping Test

The present study was designed to test the general "imbalance" hypothesis in regard to the Tapping Test, a motor measure of finger-oscillation speed from the Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological battery. The study was prompted by a recent spate of reports linking cerebral lateralization to a variety of conditions. It was hypothesized that it would be possible to determine an "optimal," midrange of lateralization, to be identified by faster tapping speeds. As hypothesized, those offenders with "moderate" laterality achieved faster speeds than those with "extreme" laterality ("extreme" defined as either less or more laterality than for the moderates). The same range appeared optimal over several demographic groups. A second goal of the present study was to pursue hints from a previous study that had suggested a lateralization measure might prove to be free of some unwanted variations by demographics. As hypothesized, the lateralization measure appeared free of variations according to age, sex, and handedness. Applications and future directions were suggested.

Parietal laterality and violence

To test whether laterality of parietal lobe cerebral functioning might relate to a history of violent behavior, a sample of 33 male and female, right-handed juvenile offenders, divided into less and more violent, each performed the Weighs Test. A lateralization index (left-hand score divided by right-hand score) formed the dependent variable. Differences for sexes and ages, but not ethnicities, required corrections. As hypothesized, poorer right- than left-parietal function related positively with the violence of past crimes. A sample of 18 additional subjects replicated the findings. The results were discussed in terms of a concept of cerebral "area-appropriateness," so that when the task-appropriate area performs less well than a less-appropriate area, we may begin to infer a dysfunction which may relate to "dyscontrol" and to violent behavior.

The control of movement in the preferred and non-preferred hands

The nature of the difference in skill between the preferred and non-preferred hands was investigated using a peg-board task. The first experiment examined the effects of varying movement amplitude and target tolerance on performance. The difference between hands was found to be related to tolerance rather than movement amplitude. The second study analysed a film record of well-practised subjects, confirming the hypothesis that most of the difference between hands is due to relative slowness of the non-preferred hand in the positioning phase involving small corrective movements. Analysis of the type and number of errors further suggested that this result is not due to differences in duration of movements but to their increased frequency, implying greater accuracy of aiming with the preferred hand. Thus whilst the initial gross analysis implicated feedback processing in skill differences the more detailed analysis suggests that motor output of the nonpreferred hand is simply more variable.