Orbital or medial frontal cortical lesions have different effects on tail pressure-elicited oral behaviors in rats

Using lickometry to infer differential contributions of salience network regions during compulsion-like alcohol drinking

Alcohol use disorder extracts substantial personal, social and clinical costs, and continued intake despite negative consequences (compulsion-like consumption) can contribute strongly. Here we discuss lickometry, a simple method where lick times are determined across a session, while analysis across many aspects of licking can offer important insights into underlying psychological and action strategies, including their brain mechanisms. We first describe studies implicating anterior insula (AIC) and dorsal medial prefrontal cortex (dMPF) in compulsion-like responding for alcohol, then review work suggesting that AIC/ventral frontal cortex versus dMPF regulate different aspects of behavior (oral control and overall response strategy, versus moment-to-moment action organization). We then detail our lickometer work comparing alcohol-only drinking (AOD) and compulsion-like drinking under moderate- or higher-challenge (ModChD or HiChD, using quinine-alcohol). Many studies have suggested utilization of one of two main strategies, with higher motivation indicated by more bouts, and greater palatability suggested by longer, faster bouts. Instead, ModChD shows decreased variability in many lick measures, which is unexpected but consistent with the suggested importance of automaticity for addiction. Also surprising is that HiChD retains several behavior changes seen with ModChD, reduced tongue variability and earlier bout start, even though intake is otherwise disrupted. Since AIC-related measures are retained under both moderate- and higher-challenge, we propose a novel hypothesis that AIC sustains overall commitment regardless of challenge level, while disordered licking during HiChD mirrors the effects of dMPF inhibition. Thus, while AIC provides overall drive despite challenge, the ability to act is ultimately determined within the dMPF.

Projections of the insular cortex to orbitofrontal and medial prefrontal cortex: A tracing study in the rat

The dense fiber pathways that connect the insular cortex with frontal cortices are thought to provide these frontal areas with interoceptive information, crucial for their involvement in executive functions. Using anterograde neuroanatomical tracing, we mapped the detailed organization of the projections from the rat insular cortex to its targets in orbitofrontal (OFC) and medial prefrontal (mPFC) cortex. In OFC, main insular projections distribute to lateral and medial parts, avoiding ventral parts. Whereas projections from the primary gustatory cortex densely innervate dorsolateral OFC, likely corresponding to what in primates is known as the secondary gustatory cortex, these projections avoid mPFC. Instead, mPFC is targeted almost exclusively by projections from agranular fields of the insular cortex. Finally, "parietal" domains of the insular cortex project specifically to the dorsolateral OFC, and strongly innervate ventral portions of mPFC, i.e., the dorsal peduncular cortex.

Orbitofrontal ensemble activity monitors licking and distinguishes among natural rewards

The classification of rhythmic licking into clusters has proved to be useful for characterizing brain mechanisms that modulate the ingestion of natural rewards (sucrose and water). One cortical area that is responsive to rewarding stimuli is the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). However, it is not presently known how OFC neurons respond while rodents freely lick for natural rewards and whether these responses are related to the structure of licking clusters. We addressed these issues by showing that temporary inactivation of the OFC decreases the duration and increases the number of clusters and that the activity of OFC neurons changed at precise times before, during, and after the cluster terminates. Furthermore, analysis of the activity of OFC neuronal ensembles showed that they could discriminate cluster onset from termination, predict when a behaving animal will begin a cluster, and distinguish and anticipate between natural rewards. These results provide a new role for the OFC in influencing licking clusters and anticipating specific rewards.

Involvement of mu1 and mu2 opioid receptor subtypes in tail-pinch feeding in rats

Tail-pinch feeding (TPF) in rats is decreased following general (naltrexone, NTX) and mu (Cys2-Tyr3-Orn5-Pen7-amide, CTOP) opioid antagonists, but not following kappa (nor-binaltorphamine. Nor-BNI) or delta (naltrindole, NTI) opioid antagonists. Because multiple mu (mu1 and mu2) and delta (delta 1 and delta 2) opioid receptor subtypes have been characterized, the present study evaluated whether TPF was differentially altered following ICV administration of general (NTX), mu (beta-funaltrexamine, B-FNA), mu1 (naloxonazine, NAZ), kappa (Nor-BNI), delta 1 ([D-Ala2, Leu5, Cys6]-enkephalin, DALCE) and delta 2 (NTI) opioid antagonists. Like the reversible mu antagonist CTOP, the irreversible mu antagonist B-FNA significantly and dose-dependently (1-20 micrograms) reduced TPF by up to 28%. In contrast, whereas NAZ (50 micrograms) reduced TPF by 32%, this effect was highly variable and failed to achieve significance. Neither NTX (5-10 mg/kg, SC), Nor-BNI (20 micrograms), DALCE (40 micrograms) nor NTI (20 micrograms) significantly altered TPF, suggesting that kappa, delta 1 and delta 2 opioid receptor subtypes were not involved. Because no antagonist altered the duration of food contact during tail pinch, it appears that the opioid effect modulates ingestive rather than activational mechanisms. The reliable inhibition of TPF by B-FNA (mu1 and mu2), together with the variable effect of naloxonazine (mu1), appears to implicate both mu binding sites in this response.

Modulation of antinociceptive responses following tail pinch stress

Mild, non-noxious, oscillating pinches to a rat's tail elicits hyperphagia. The present study examined whether tail-pinch (TP) would exert hyperalgesic and hyperactive effects in rats that also exhibit the overeating response. The first experiment assessed TP effects upon reactivity to electric shock as measured by flinch-jump thresholds. Significant decreases in jump thresholds were observed 0 and 15, but not 30, min following TP. This effect persisted regardless of whether food was present or absent during TP. The second experiment assessed TP effects upon reactivity to heat as measured by hot-plate latencies. In contrast to jump thresholds, the shortened hot-plate latencies observed following TP persisted into the recovery period. In examining TP effects upon activity levels (Experiment 3), it was found that animals display similar patterns of temporally-declining activity regardless of whether TP was administered or not. Finally, TP selectively decreased the analgesic responses to two different doses of morphine and two different cold-water swim temperatures (Experiment 4). The TP-induced reductions occurred when TP was administered either before or after the analgesic manipulation. These data are discussed in terms of the nociceptive selectivity of the TP effect, and its influences upon analgesic processes.