Paraventricular hypothalamic obesity in rats: role of corticosterone

Glucocorticoid and triiodothyronine concentrations do not correlate with behavior in vicuñas (Vicugna vicugna)

State-dependent foraging theory posits that animals should make foraging decisions based on energetic condition, where animals with fewer energetic reserves prioritize foraging over other behaviors, including antipredator behaviors. However, few studies have investigated these trade-offs at an individual level in wild, free-ranging animals. We investigated the relationships between internal condition and behavior in a wild mammal, the vicuña (Vicugna vicugna), which makes state-dependent decisions about the use of two habitats with different characteristics that contribute to their internal condition. Using non-invasively collected fecal samples, we measured glucocorticoid metabolites (GCMs) and thyroid hormones (THs) as indicators of combined stress (predation and nutritional), and just nutritional stress, respectively. We video recorded 20-minute behavioral observations and focused on behaviors which often demand a trade-off between energy acquisition and antipredator behaviors-vigilance and foraging. We found differences in expression of these behaviors between the two sites but found no relationships between physiological parameters (GCMs and THs) and behavior (vigilance and foraging) at either site. We suggest that state-dependent foraging may be difficult to observe in large mammals under baseline conditions and that GCMs and THs may be insensitive to small changes in stress stimuli at this scale, and where these wild animals have the entire suite of behavioral responses available to them.

Actions of glucocorticoids at a seasonal baseline as compared to stress-related levels in the regulation of periodic life processes

For decades, demands associated with the predictable life-history cycle have been considered stressful and have not been distinguished from stress that occurs in association with unpredictable and life-threatening perturbations in the environment. The recent emergence of the concept of allostasis distinguishes behavioral and physiological responses to predictable routines as opposed to unpredictable perturbations, and allows for their comparison within one theoretical framework. Glucocorticosteroids (GCs) have been proposed as important mediators of allostasis, as they allow for rapid readjustment and support of behavior and physiology in response to predictable and unpredictable demands (allostatic load). Much work has already been done in defining GC action at the high concentrations that accompany life-threatening perturbations. However, less is known about the role of GCs in relation to daily and seasonal life processes. In this review, we summarize the known behavioral and physiological effects of GCs relating to the predictable life-history cycle, paying particular attention to feeding behavior, locomotor activity and energy metabolism. Although we utilize a comparative approach, emphasis is placed on birds. In addition, we briefly review effects of GCs at stress-related concentrations to test the hypothesis that different levels of GCs play specific and distinct roles in the regulation of life processes and, thus, participate in the promotion of different physiological states. We also examine the receptor types through which GC action may be mediated and suggest mechanisms whereby different GC concentrations may exert their actions. In conclusion, we argue that biological actions of GCs at "non-stress" seasonal concentrations play a critical role in the adjustment of responses that accompany predictable variability in the environment and demand more careful consideration in future studies.

The rise, fall, and resurrection of the ventromedial hypothalamus in the regulation of feeding behavior and body weight

Early researchers found that lesions of the ventromedial hypothalamus (VMH) resulted in hyperphagia and obesity in a variety of species including humans, which led them to designate the VMH as the brain's "satiety center." Many researchers later dismissed a role for the VMH in feeding behavior when Gold claimed that lesions restricted to the VMH did not result in overeating and that obesity was observed only with lesions or knife cuts that extended beyond the borders of the VMH and damaged or severed the ventral noradrenergic bundle (VNAB) or paraventricular nucleus (PVN). However, anatomical studies done both before and after Gold's study did not replicate his results with lesions, and in nearly every published direct comparison of VMH lesions vs. PVN or VNAB lesions, the group with VMH lesions ate substantially more food and gained twice as much weight. Several other important differences have also been found between VMH and both PVN and VNAB lesion-induced obesity. Concerns regarding (a) motivation to work for food and (b) the effects of nonirritative lesions have also been addressed and answered in many studies. Lesion studies with weanling rats and adult pair-tube-fed rats, as well as recent studies of knockout mice deficient in the orphan nuclear receptor steroidogenic factor 1, indicate that VMH lesion-induced obesity is in large part a metabolic obesity (due to autonomic nervous system disorders) independent of hyperphagia. However, there is ample evidence that the VMH also plays a primary role in feeding behavior. Neuroimaging studies in humans have shown a marked increase in activity in the area of the VMH during feeding. The VMH has a large population of glucoresponsive neurons that dynamically respond to blood glucose levels and numerous histamine, dopamine, serotonin, and GABA neurons that respond to feeding-related stimuli. Recent studies have implicated melanocortins in the VMH regulation of feeding behavior: food intake decreases when arcuate nucleus pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) neurons activate VMH brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) neurons. Moderate hyperphagia and obesity have also been observed in female rats with damage to the efferent projections from the posterodorsal amygdala to the VMH. Hypothalamic obesity can result from damage to either the POMC or BDNF neurons. The concept of hypothalamic feeding and satiety centers is outdated and unnecessary, and progress in understanding hypothalamic mechanisms of feeding behavior will be achieved only by appreciating the different types of neural and blood-borne information received by the various nuclei, and then attempting to determine how this information is integrated to obtain a balance between energy intake and energy output.

Reinterpretation of Basal Glucocorticoid Feedback: Implications to Behavioral and Metabolic Disease

A number of metabolic (e.g., abdominal obesity) and psychological (e.g., depression) pathologies commonly present together and have been associated with dysregulation in the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Glucocorticoid hormones represent the final product of this classic neuroendocrine axis, and these steroids modulate neuroendocrine, metabolic, and behavioral function. A primary characteristic of the HPA axis is a negative feedback loop, and glucocorticoids act through the brain to inhibit drive to this neuroendocrine system. Slight and chronic perturbations in glucocorticoid levels, below or above normal, throughout the body lead to metabolic (e.g., abdominal obesity) and behavioral (e.g., depression) pathology. Appropriate feedback in the HPA axis is, therefore, critical, and determining how and where glucocorticoids act to impart their feedback effects have been the focus of many laboratories. However, the answer to these questions remain, in part, elusive. In this chapter, I review findings that have led me to reinterpret glucocorticoid feedback in the HPA axis. I propose that, under basal (nonstress) conditions, glucocorticoid feedback is a consequence of the metabolic actions of the adrenal steroid, not a direct effect on brain. This new perspective may provide insight into the etiology of diseases such as major depression and the metabolic syndrome X, and might explain the commonly observed coexistence of affective and metabolic disturbances.

Glucocorticoid replacement, but not corticotropin-releasing hormone deficiency, prevents adrenalectomy-induced anorexia in mice

There is considerable evidence that CRH can suppress food intake. As hypothalamic CRH, a main site of CRH expression, is also negatively regulated by glucocorticoids, it is unclear whether anorexia and weight loss in adrenal insufficiency are attributable to elevated CRH or to decreased glucocorticoid levels. To distinguish these possibilities, we have measured food intake and body weight in wild-type and CRH-deficient mice after sham adrenalectomy (Sham ADX) or adrenalectomy (ADX) with and without corticosterone (B) replacement. CRH deficiency neither increased basal food intake and body weight nor attenuated decreases in food intake after ADX or Sham ADX. B replacement producing plasma levels above the circadian peak completely blocked ADX-induced decreases in feeding and body weight in all mice and frequently stimulated food intake in CRH-deficient mice. Plasma levels of insulin and leptin, two other hormones involved in appetite regulation, did not differ between genotypes; however, the relationship between food intake and circulating leptin was significantly less negative at B doses that preserved appetite. B replacement levels slightly below circadian peak concentrations did not prevent hypophagia after ADX. We conclude that factors other than or in addition to CRH are more important in mediating appetite responses to adrenalectomy.

Effect of oleoyl-estrone administration on corticosterone binding to tissues of lean and obese Zucker rats

A group of female Zucker lean and obese rats was treated with 3.5 micromol/day kg of oleoyl-estrone in liposomes (OE) injected i.v. continuously for 14 days with inserted osmotic minipumps. Samples of liver were extracted on days 0, 3, 6, 10 and 14 and the expression of corticosterone-binding globulin (CBG) was determined by Northern blot. On the same dates, the total binding capacity of plasma, liver, periovaric white adipose tissue (WAT) and subcutaneous WAT was also determined using tritium-labelled corticosterone. Treatment with OE resulted in diminished CBG gene expression in the liver, this being more marked in the obese rats. Basal (time 0) corticosterone binding was higher in the plasma, liver and WAT of lean rats. Treatment with OE resulted in a gradual and general loss of binding capacity in the plasma and all tissues studied, for lean and obese rats alike. Since CBG decreases may result in enhanced glucocorticoid availability (and effects), the global decrease in corticosterone binding observed can be interpreted as a counteractive response to the energy imbalance elicited by OE.

Adrenal steroid receptors: interactions with brain neuropeptide systems in relation to nutrient intake and metabolism

The glucocorticoid, corticosterone (CORT), is believed to have an important function in modulating nutrient ingestion and metabolism. Recent evidence described in this review suggests that the effects of this adrenal hormone are mediated through two steroid receptor subtypes, the type I mineralocorticoid receptor and the type II glucocorticoid receptor. These receptors, which have different affinities for CORT, respond to different levels of circulating hormone. They mediate distinct effects of the steroid, which can be distinguished by the specific nutrient ingested and by the particular period of the circadian cycle. Under normal physiological conditions, the type I receptor is tonically activated, either by low basal levels of circulating CORT (0.5-2 microgram %) normally available across the circadian cycle or possibly by the mineralocorticoid aldosterone. This type I activation is required for the maintenance of fat ingestion and fat deposition that occurs during most meals of the feeding cycle. In contrast, the type II receptor is phasically activated by moderate levels of CORT (2-10 micrograms %) normally reached during the circadian peak. Activation of this receptor is required for the natural surge in carbohydrate ingestion and metabolism that is essential at the onset of the active feeding cycle when the body's glycogen stores are at their nadir, and gluconeogenesis is needed to maintain blood glucose levels. This receptor is also activated during periods of increased energy requirements, such as, after exercise and food restriction, when CORT levels rise further (> 10 micrograms %) and when its catabolic effects on fat and protein stores predominate to provide additional substrates for glucose homeostasis. These functions of CORT on fat and carbohydrate balance are mediated, in part, by type I and type II receptors located within the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus, which is known to have key functions in controlling nutrient intake and metabolism, as well as circulating CORT levels. Moreover, the type II receptors within this nucleus, in addition to the arcuate nucleus, may interact positively with the peptide, neuropeptide Y, and the catecholamine, norepinephrine, both of which act to enhance natural carbohydrate feeding and CORT release at the onset of the natural feeding cycle. Thus, under normal conditions, endogenous CORT has a primary function in controlling nutrient ingestion and metabolism over the natural circadian cycle, through the coordinated action of the type I and type II steroid receptor systems. Through this action, CORT has impact on total caloric intake and body weight gain over the long term.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Animal models of obesity--theories of aetiology

The multiplicity of proposed mechanisms for obesity is confusing and many questions remain to be answered. A review of all the proposed mechanisms for obesity suggests that they can be placed in two groups (Table 3). The first centres on the role of the hypothalamus in the regulation of body weight. With further knowledge it may be possible to find unifying mechanisms originating in the brain for the set-point theory, the autonomic nervous system imbalance hypothesis, the thermogenesis, hyperphagia and the hyperinsulinaemia hypotheses and the gestational undernutrition hypothesis. This group of mechanisms suggests that obesity is due to altered function of central regulatory mechanisms and that the various related hypotheses are merely looking at different aspects of the same problem. The second centres on abnormalities intrinsic to the adipocyte and could link the fat cell and perinatal overnutrition theories. This group of theories suggests that an abnormality at the fat cell level, either genetic or acquired, can result in the excessive accumulation of fat. The two groups are not contradictory. The ability to develop obesity as a result of a fat cell abnormality does not negate the existence of regulatory central mechanisms since there is a finite capacity for these mechanisms to operate.

Lesions of hypothalamic paraventricular nuclei do not prevent the effect of estradiol on energy and fat balance

The chronic effects of estradiol (E2) on energy balance have been investigated in ovariectomized rats with hypothalamic paraventricular nuclei (PVH) lesions. Body weight and food intake were monitored throughout the E2 treatment, which lasted 26 days. At the end of this treatment, rats were decapitated, and their carcasses were processed to determine the body contents in energy, fat, and protein. Plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and corticosterone were determined by radioimmunoassay and protein-binding assay at the end of the study. Regardless of whether they were sham- or PVH-lesioned, E2-treated rats ate, expended, and gained significantly less energy than untreated animals. In addition, E2-treated rats deposited less fat and protein than the rats not receiving E2. In contrast to the E2 treatment, PVH lesions accelerated the gains in energy and fat regardless of whether the rats were treated with E2 or with a placebo. There were no interaction effects of PVH lesions and the E2 treatment on energy or fat gains. Plasma levels of corticosterone and ACTH were higher in E2-treated rats than in animals receiving the placebo treatment. The present results provide evidence that the hypothalamic PVH is not an essential neuroanatomical structure in the effects of E2 on energy and fat balances.