Effects of specific monoclonal antibodies on La Crosse virus neutralization: aggregation, inactivation by Fab fragments, and inhibition of attachment to baby hamster kidney cells

Cellular localization and antigenic characterization of crimean-congo hemorrhagic fever virus glycoproteins

Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV), a member of the genus Nairovirus of the family Bunyaviridae, causes severe disease with high rates of mortality in humans. The CCHFV M RNA segment encodes the virus glycoproteins G(N) and G(C). To understand the processing and intracellular localization of the CCHFV glycoproteins as well as their neutralization and protection determinants, we produced and characterized monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) specific for both G(N) and G(C). Using these MAbs, we found that G(N) predominantly colocalized with a Golgi marker when expressed alone or with G(C), while G(C) was transported to the Golgi apparatus only in the presence of G(N). Both proteins remained endo-beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase H sensitive, indicating that the CCHFV glycoproteins are most likely targeted to the cis Golgi apparatus. Golgi targeting information partly resides within the G(N) ectodomain, because a soluble version of G(N) lacking its transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains also localized to the Golgi apparatus. Coexpression of soluble versions of G(N) and G(C) also resulted in localization of soluble G(C) to the Golgi apparatus, indicating that the ectodomains of these proteins are sufficient for the interactions needed for Golgi targeting. Finally, the mucin-like and P35 domains, located at the N terminus of the G(N) precursor protein and removed posttranslationally by endoproteolysis, were required for Golgi targeting of G(N) when it was expressed alone but were dispensable when G(C) was coexpressed. In neutralization assays on SW-13 cells, MAbs to G(C), but not to G(N), prevented CCHFV infection. However, only a subset of G(C) MAbs protected mice in passive-immunization experiments, while some nonneutralizing G(N) MAbs efficiently protected animals from a lethal CCHFV challenge. Thus, neutralization of CCHFV likely depends not only on the properties of the antibody, but on host cell factors as well. In addition, nonneutralizing antibody-dependent mechanisms, such as antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity, may be involved in the in vivo protection seen with the MAbs to G(C).

Valency of antibody binding to virions and its determination by surface plasmon resonance

All IgGs are homobivalent, but their ability to bind bivalently to the surface of a virus particle depends mainly on a favourable spacing of cognate epitopes and the angle that the FAb arm makes with the virus surface. If the angle of binding forces the second FAb arm to point into solution, monovalent binding is inevitable. This IgG will have the same affinity as its FAb, will be less stably bound than if it were bound bivalently, cannot cross-link epitopes on the surface of a virion, and cannot neutralise by cross-linking surface proteins. However, at moderate IgG concentrations, monovalently bound IgG can reduce infectivity by aggregating virions, a phenomenon that cannot occur with IgG bound bivalently. This review describes how surface plasmon resonance can be used to determine the valency of IgG binding to enveloped and non-enveloped virus particles, and discusses the implications of this new methodology.

Occupancy and mechanism in antibody-mediated neutralization of animal viruses

Neutralization of virus infectivity by antibodies is an important component of immunity to several virus infections. Here, the immunochemical basis for the action of neutralizing antibodies, and what role their induction of conformational changes in the antigen might play, is reviewed. Theories of the mechanisms by which antibodies neutralize virus infectivity in vitro are also presented. The theoretical and empirical foundation of the hypothesis that viruses are neutralized by a single antibody per virion is critically reviewed. The relationship between antibody occupancy on virions and the mechanism of neutralization is explored. Examples of neutralization mediated through antibody interference with virus attachment and entry are discussed and test implications of refined theories of neutralization by antibody coating of virions are formulated.

Two influenza A virus-specific Fabs neutralize by inhibiting virus attachment to target cells, while neutralization by their IgGs is complex and occurs simultaneously through fusion inhibition and attachment inhibition

Mabs H36 (IgG2a) and H37 (IgG3) recognize epitopes in antigenic sites Sb and Ca2, respectively, in the HA1 subunit of influenza virus A/PR/8/34 (H1N1). Their neutralization was complex. Our aim here was to investigate the mechanism of neutralization by the IgGs and their Fabs. In MDCK and BHK cells, both IgGs neutralized primarily by inhibiting virus-cell fusion, although at higher IgG concentrations virus attachment to target cells was also inhibited. In contrast, the Fabs neutralized entirely by inhibiting virus attachment, although a higher concentration of Fab than IgG was required to bring this about. Both H36 and H37 exerted a concentration-dependent spectrum of neutralization activity, with virus-cell fusion inhibition and virus-cell attachment inhibition being the predominant mechanisms at low- and high-antibody concentration, respectively, and both mechanisms occurring simultaneously at intermediate concentrations. However, it may be that attachment inhibition was a secondary event, occurring to virus that had already been neutralized through inhibition of its fusion activity. Neutralization by H36 and H37 Fabs was a simple process. Both inhibited virus attachment but required much higher (>100-fold) molar concentrations for activity than did IgG. The functional affinities of the IgGs were high (0.4-0.6 nM) and differences between these and the affinity of their Fabs (H36, nil; H37, 23-fold) were not sufficient to explain the differences observed in neutralization. Similar neutralization data were obtained in two different cell lines. The dose-response curve for neutralization by H36 F(ab')(2) resembled that for IgG, although eightfold more F(ab')(2) was required for 50% neutralization. Overall, neutralization mechanisms of H36 and H37 antibodies were similar, and thus independent of antigenic site, antibody isotype, and target cell.

Two-phase approach for the expression of high-affinity human anti-human immunodeficiency virus immunoglobulin Fab domains in Escherichia coli

We describe here a two-phase approach for the development of high-affinity human anti-HIV immunoglobulin Fab domains in a bacterial expression system. The first phase of this technique involves the generation of human hybridoma cell lines producing high-affinity antibodies (MAbs). Anti-HIV-1 human MAbs from peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) were prepared from an HIV-1-seropositive patient and from an HIV-1-seronegative volunteer immunized with HIV-1 rgp160. One MAb (T15G1), derived from the blood of the seropositive donor, was specific for HIV-1 gp41, recognized gp41 on the surface of HIV-1-infected cells and bound this antigen with an apparent dissociation constant of 4 x 10(-10) M. A second MAb (M7B5), developed from the immunized volunteer, was specific for HIV-1 gp120 with a dissociation constant on the order of 8 x 10(-10) M, but was unable to recognize cell surface antigen. In the second phase of this technique the Fab domains of these two MAbs were molecularly cloned into a bacterial expression vector. mRNA was isolated from the M7B5 and T15G1 hybridoma cell lines and used as a template for the production of cDNA. The cDNA was amplified using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique, and then fused, in frame, into a bacterial expression vector. The recombinant Fabs (rFabM7B5 and rFabT15G1) were expressed as dicistronic messages in bacteria using the IPTG-inducible lactose promoter (LacZ). DNA sequencing was used to define the gamma chain isotypes and the VH and VL chain gene usage. The binding specificities of rFabM7B5 and rFabT15G1 were indistinguishable from their respective intact MAbs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

A recombinant human Fab expressed in Escherichia coli neutralizes rabies virus

A recombinant human anti-rabies monoclonal antibody (MAb-57) Fab was prepared by cloning the heavy (Fd)- and light-chain domains into the same bacterial expression vector. To construct the recombinant Fab, mRNA was extracted from MAb-57-producing hybridoma cells, reverse transcribed, and then amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) by using oligonucleotides specific for immunoglobulin heavy- and light-chain DNA sequences. PCR-amplified Fd-chain cDNA was fused, in frame, between a bacterial leader peptide (PelB) at the amino terminus and a 10-amino-acid peptide tag at the carboxy terminus. The PCR-amplified lambda-chain cDNA was also fused to the PelB leader peptide. The immunoglobulin Fab was then expressed as a dicistronic message in bacteria by using the isopropyl-beta-D-thiogalactopyranoside-inducible lactose promotor (lacZ). DNA sequencing was used to define the gamma-chain isotype (immunoglobulin G1) and VH (VHI) chain and VL (V lambda II) chain gene usage. The recombinant Fab (rFab57) specifically bound the rabies virus coat glycoprotein, while the Fd and lambda chains, when expressed individually, did not. The binding specificity of rFab57 was indistinguishable from that of the intact MAb in direct enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays; however, the dissociation constant of rFab57 for rabies virus protein G was approximately 1 log10 U lower than that of complete MAb-57 in competition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. A fluorescent-focus inhibition assay showed that bacterially expressed rFab was capable of neutralizing rabies virus strain CVS-11. We conclude that a human Fab expressed in bacteria maintains its specificity and biologic activity.