A model for after-effects of seen movement

Repulsive Aftereffects of Visual Space

Prolonged exposure to a sensory stimulus induces perceptual adaptation aftereffects. Traditionally, aftereffects are known to change the appearance of stimulus features, like contrast, color, or shape. However, shifts in the spatial position of objects have also been observed to follow adaptation. Here, I demonstrate that visual adaptation produced by different adapter stimuli generates a bi-directional spatial repulsion. Observers had to judge the distance between a probe dot pair presented in the adapted region and compare them to a reference dot pair presented in a region not affected by adaptation. If the probe dot pair was present inside the adapted area, observers underestimated the distance. If, however, the dot pair straddled the adapted area, the distance was perceived as larger with a stronger distance expansion than compression. Bi-directional spatial repulsion was found with a similar magnitude for size and density adapters. Localization estimates with mouse pointing revealed that adaptation also affected absolute position judgments. Bi-directional spatial repulsion is most likely produced by the lines of adapter stimuli since single bars used as adapters were sufficient to induce spatial repulsion. Spatial repulsion was stronger for stimuli presented in the periphery. This finding explains why distance expansion is stronger than distance compression.

Contingent adaptation in masking and surround suppression

Adaptation is the process that changes a neuron's response based on recent inputs. In the traditional model, a neuron's state of adaptation depends on the recent input to that neuron alone, whereas in a recently introduced model (Hebbian normalization), adaptation depends on the structure of neural correlated firing. In particular, increased response products between pairs of neurons leads to increased mutual suppression. We test a psychophysical prediction of this model: adaptation should depend on 2nd-order statistics of input stimuli. That is, if two stimuli excite two distinct sub-populations of neurons, then presenting those stimuli simultaneously during adaptation should strengthen mutual suppression between those subpopulations. We confirm this prediction in two experiments. In the first, pairing two gratings synchronously during adaptation (i.e., a plaid) rather than asynchronously (interleaving the two gratings in time) leads to increased effectiveness of one pattern for masking the other. In the second, pairing the gratings in a center-surround configuration results in reduced apparent contrast for the central grating when paired with the same surround (as compared with a condition in which the central grating appears with a different surround at test than during adaptation). These results are consistent with the prediction that an increase in response covariance leads to greater mutual suppression between neurons. This effect is detectable both at threshold (masking) and well above threshold (apparent contrast).

Stereo-Curvature Aftereffect Is Due to More Than Shape Curvature Adaptation

For stereo-curvature aftereffect (sCAE), there is no agreement on whether adaptation occurs at the disparity-specified stage, the percept-specified stage, or both. Additionally, it remains uncertain whether retinal-position-dependent sCAE can be induced by possible adaptation to disparity-specified sources. Our study aimed to investigate the dependency and processing levels of adaptation underlying sCAE using dynamic spherical adaptation stimuli with static fixation. Experiment I examined the dependency by dynamically altering the location or size of adaptation stimuli. Experiment 2 investigated the adaptation levels via three sub-experiments: Experiment 2.1 examined how eccentricity influenced adaptation strength using static adaptation stimuli with different eccentricities, Experiment 2.2 tested a hypothesis about adaptation to a percept-specified primitive shape index (PSI) using dynamic size change of adaptation stimuli, and Experiment 2.3 tested another hypothesis on adapting disparity-specified average disparity information (ADI) using dynamic PSI change of adaptation stimuli. The results showed retinal-position-dependent and scale-independent sCAE. In addition to a possible eccentricity effect, the retinal-position dependence can result from ADI adaptation while the scale independence can be attributed to PSI adaptation. Therefore, sCAE is caused by adaptation at both the disparity-specified and percept-specified stages. Additionally, sCAE endows two coexisting adaptation processes with one dependent on retinal position and one independent of retinal position.

The aftereffect of perceived duration is contingent on auditory frequency but not visual orientation

Recent sensory history plays a critical role in duration perception. It has been established that after adapting to a particular duration, the test durations within a certain range appear to be distorted. To explore whether the aftereffect of perceived duration can be constrained by sensory modality and stimulus feature within a modality, the current study applied the technique of simultaneous sensory adaptation, by which observers were able to simultaneously adapt to two durations defined by two different stimuli. Using both simple visual and auditory stimuli, we found that the aftereffect of perceived duration is modality specific and contingent on auditory frequency but not visual orientation of the stimulus. These results demonstrate that there are independent timers responsible for the aftereffects of perceived duration in each sensory modality. Furthermore, the timer for the auditory modality may be located at a relatively earlier stage of sensory processing than the timer for the visual modality.

Effects of surround suppression on response adaptation of V1 neurons to visual stimuli

The influence of intracortical inhibition on the response adaptation of visual cortical neurons remains in debate. To clarify this issue, in the present study the influence of surround suppression evoked through the local inhibitory interneurons on the adaptation effects of neurons in the primary visual cortex (V1) were observed. Moreover, the adaptations of V1 neurons to both the high-contrast visual stimuli presented in the classical receptive field (CRF) and to the costimulation presented in the CRF and the surrounding nonclassical receptive field (nCRF) were compared. The intensities of surround suppression were modulated with different sized grating stimuli. The results showed that the response adaptation of V1 neurons decreased significantly with the increase of surround suppression and this adaptation decrease was due to the reduction of the initial response of V1 neurons to visual stimuli. However, the plateau response during adaptation showed no significant changes. These findings indicate that the adaptation effects of V1 neurons may not be directly affected by surround suppression, but may be dynamically regulated by a negative feedback network and be finely adjusted by its initial spiking response to stimulus. This adaptive regulation is not only energy efficient for the central nervous system, but also beneficially acts to maintain the homeostasis of neuronal response to long-presenting visual signals.

Adaptation maintains population homeostasis in primary visual cortex

Sensory systems exhibit mechanisms of neural adaptation, which adjust neuronal activity on the basis of recent stimulus history. In primary visual cortex (V1) in particular, adaptation controls the responsiveness of individual neurons and shifts their visual selectivity. What benefits does adaptation confer on a neuronal population? We measured adaptation in the responses of populations of cat V1 neurons to stimulus ensembles with markedly different statistics of stimulus orientation. We found that adaptation served two homeostatic goals. First, it maintained equality in the time-averaged responses across the population. Second, it maintained independence in selectivity across the population. Adaptation scaled and distorted population activity according to a simple multiplicative rule that depended on neuronal orientation preference and on stimulus orientation. We conclude that adaptation in V1 acts as a mechanism of homeostasis, enforcing a tendency toward equality and independence in neural activity across the population.

Evidence for a subtractive component in motion adaptation

Adaptation to a moving stimulus changes the perception of a stationary grating and also reduces contrast sensitivity to the adaptor. We determined whether the first effect could be predicted from the second. The contrast discrimination (T vs. C) function for a drifting 7.5 Hz grating test stimulus was determined when observers were adapted to a low contrast (0.075) grating of the same spatial and temporal frequency, moving in either the same or the opposite direction as the test. The effect of an adaptor moving in the same direction was to move the T vs. C function upwards and to the right, in a manner consistent with an increase in divisive inhibition. We also measured the effect of adaptation on the motion-null point for a counterphasing grating containing two components, one moving in the same direction as the adaptor and the other in the opposite direction. Adaptation increased the amount of contrast of the adapted component required to achieve the motion-null point. However, this shift could not be predicted from the effects of adaptation on contrast sensitivity. In particular, the balance point was shifted in gratings of high contrast where there was no effect of adaptation on contrast discrimination. We suggest that adaptation has a subtractive (recalibration) effect in addition to its effects on the contrast transduction function, and that this subtractive effect may explain the movement after-effect seen with stationary tests.

Visual motion aftereffects arise from a cascade of two isomorphic adaptation mechanisms

Prolonged exposure to a moving stimulus can substantially alter the perceived velocity (both speed and direction) of subsequently presented stimuli. Here, we show that these changes can be parsimoniously explained with a model that combines the effects of two isomorphic adaptation mechanisms, one nondirectional and one directional. Each produces a pattern of velocity biases that serves as an observable "signature" of the corresponding mechanism. The net effect on perceived velocity is a superposition of these two signatures. By examining human velocity judgments in the context of different adaptor velocities, we are able to separate these two signatures. The model fits the data well, successfully predicts subjects' behavior in an additional experiment using a nondirectional adaptor, and is in agreement with a variety of previous experimental results. As such, the model provides a unifying explanation for the diversity of motion aftereffects.

fMRI and its interpretations: an illustration on directional selectivity in area V5/MT

fMRI is a tool to study brain function noninvasively that can reliably identify sites of neural involvement for a given task. However, to what extent can fMRI signals be related to measures obtained in electrophysiology? Can the blood-oxygen-level-dependent signal be interpreted as spatially pooled spiking activity? Here we combine knowledge from neurovascular coupling, functional imaging and neurophysiology to discuss whether fMRI has succeeded in demonstrating one of the most established functional properties in the visual brain, namely directional selectivity in the motion-processing region V5/MT+. We also discuss differences of fMRI and electrophysiology in their sensitivity to distinct physiological processes. We conclude that fMRI constitutes a complement, not a poor-resolution substitute, to invasive techniques, and that it deserves interpretations that acknowledge its stand as a separate signal.

The pulse-train auditory aftereffect and the perception of rapid amplitude modulations

Prolonged listening to a pulse train with repetition rates around 100 Hz induces a striking aftereffect, whereby subsequently presented sounds are heard with an unusually "metallic" timbre [Rosenblith et al., Science 106, 333-335 (1947)]. The mechanisms responsible for this auditory aftereffect are currently unknown. Whether the aftereffect is related to an alteration of the perception of temporal envelope fluctuations was evaluated. Detection thresholds for sinusoidal amplitude modulation (AM) imposed onto noise-burst carriers were measured for different AM frequencies (50-500 Hz), following the continuous presentation of a periodic pulse train, a temporally jittered pulse train, or an unmodulated noise. AM detection thresholds for AM frequencies of 100 Hz and above were significantly elevated compared to thresholds in quiet, following the presentation of the pulse-train inducers, and both induced a subjective auditory aftereffect. Unmodulated noise, which produced no audible aftereffect, left AM detection thresholds unchanged. Additional experiments revealed that, like the Rosenblith et al. aftereffect, the effect on AM thresholds does not transfer across ears, is not eliminated by protracted training, and can last several tens of seconds. The results suggest that the Rosenblith et al. aftereffect is related to a temporary alteration in the perception of fast temporal envelope fluctuations in sounds.

Subtractive and divisive adaptation in visual motion computations

Models of visual motion processing that introduce priors for low speed through Bayesian computations are sometimes treated with scepticism by empirical researchers because of the convenient way in which parameters of the Bayesian priors have been chosen. Using the effects of motion adaptation on motion perception to illustrate, we show that the Bayesian prior, far from being convenient, may be estimated on-line and therefore represents a useful tool by which visual motion processes may be optimized in order to extract the motion signals commonly encountered in every day experience. The prescription for optimization, when combined with system constraints on the transmission of visual information, may lead to an exaggeration of perceptual bias through the process of adaptation. Our approach extends the Bayesian model of visual motion proposed byWeiss et al. [Weiss Y., Simoncelli, E., & Adelson, E. (2002). Motion illusions as optimal perception Nature Neuroscience, 5:598-604.], in suggesting that perceptual bias reflects a compromise taken by a rational system in the face of uncertain signals and system constraints.

Predicting the motion after-effect from sensitivity loss

The widely accepted disinhibition theory of the motion after-effect (MAE) proposes that the balance point of an opponent mechanism is changed by directional adaptation. To see if the post-adaptation balance point could be predicted from contrast adaptation, we measured threshold-vs-contrast (i.e., T-vs-C or dipper) functions, before and after adaptation to moving gratings. For test stimuli moving in the same direction, adaptation shifted the point of maximum facilitation (i.e., the dip) upwards and rightwards. For tests moving in the opposite direction, adaptation produced a similar, but smaller, shift. These shifts are consistent with a change in divisive gain control. They are also consistent with subtractive inhibition followed by half-wave rectification. We attempted to use transducer functions derived from these data to predict the strength of the MAE. When combined, gratings moving in the adapted and opposite directions appeared perfectly balanced (i.e., counterphasing) when the latter was given approximately 2% more contrast than was predicted on the basis of the derived transducers. This small under-prediction may be indicative of sensory recalibration. Finally, we found that adaptation did not alter the fact that low-contrast stimuli could be detected and their direction identified with similar accuracy. We conclude that both static and dynamic forms of MAE are primarily caused by a decreased sensitivity in directionally tuned mechanisms, as proposed by the disinhibition theory.

Storage for free: a surprising property of a simple gain-control model of motion aftereffects

If a motion aftereffect (MAE) for given adaptation conditions has a duration T s, and the eyes are closed after adaptation during a waiting period tw=T s before testing, an unexpected MAE of a 'residual' duration TrT s is experienced. This effect is called 'storage' and it is often quantified by a storage factor sigma=TrT/T, which can reach values up to about 0.7-0.8. The phenomenon and its name have invited explanations in terms of inhibition of recovery during darkness. We present a model based on the opposite idea, that an effective test stimulus quickens recovery relative to darkness or other ineffective test stimuli. The model is worked out in mathematical detail and proves to explain 'storage' data from the literature, on the static MAE (sMAE: an MAE experienced for static test stimuli). We also present results of a psychophysical experiment with moving random pixel arrays, quantifying storage phenomena both for the sMAE and the dynamic MAE (dMAE: an MAE experienced for a random dynamic noise test stimulus). Storage factors for the dMAE are lower than for the sMAE. Our model also gives an excellent description of these new data on storage of the dMAE. The term 'storage' might therefore be a misnomer. If an effective test stimulus influences all direction tuned motion sensors indiscriminately and thus speeds up equalization of gains, one gets the storage phenomenon for free.

Orientation specificity of contrast adaptation in visual cortical pinwheel centres and iso-orientation domains

Exposure to a high-contrast visual stimulus causes adaptation, a psychophysical phenomenon that is quite selective for stimulus orientation. Its mechanism is largely cortical but the underlying circuitry is still not unambiguously resolved. It has been suggested that adaptation could be the result of integration of inputs from cells within a large local pool, effectively scaling their outputs with respect to local contrast. In this case, orientation selectivity of neuronal adaptation should depend on the location of neurons within the cortical map of orientation preference. We tested this hypothesis by quantifying adaptation to optimally oriented and to orthogonal-to-optimum gratings among neurons recorded either from iso-orientation domains or orientation pinwheel centres, as identified by optical imaging of cat visual cortex. We did not find a significant difference in adaptation characteristics for these two populations of cells, implying that these characteristics do not depend on the local functional architecture. Surprisingly, however, we additionally observed that under isoflurane (but not halothane) anaesthesia, most neurons exhibited adaptation by cross-oriented gratings, regardless of their location within the orientation map. It seems likely that, under isoflurane, inputs became visible that were masked by the commonly used, deeper halothane anaesthesia. For individual cells, the presence of these inputs was independent of their location within the cortical orientation map.

Directional tuning of human motion adaptation as reflected by the motion VEP

Motion onset evoked visual potentials are dominated by a negativity (N2) at occipital electrodes and a positivity (P2) at the vertex. The degree of true motion processing reflected by N2 and P2 was estimated from the direction specificity of motion adaptation. Adapting stimuli moved to the right and test stimuli (random dot patterns of 26 degrees diameter; 10% contrast; 10.5 degrees /s velocity) moved in one of eight directions, which differed by 45 degrees. VEPs were recorded from occipito/temporal and central sites in eight subjects. Two adaptation effects were observed for N2 (P<0.01): a global amplitude reduction by 47% and a direction-specific reduction by a further 28%. For P2, only the global effect (54%; P<0.01) was observed. The global adaptation effect could also be induced by pattern reversal and pattern-onset adaptation, i.e. stimuli containing ambiguous or very little motion energy, respectively. We conclude that at least 28% of the N2 amplitude reflects the activity of direction-specific elements, whereas P2 does not at all.

Direction-specific changes of sensitivity after brief apparent motion stimuli

Direction-specific losses in sensitivity were found for a test grating which was superimposed on a stationary contrast pedestal and which moved either in the same or opposite direction as a prior biasing stimulus. Three types of biasing stimuli were employed: a grating swept through 270 degrees in 45 degrees steps, a single 90 degrees step of a grating, and a single 90 degrees step of a grating which contained a blank IFI and whose perceived direction was reversed. For the biasing sweep and the single 90 degrees step, the response of directionally selective mechanisms (directional motion energy) is greatest for the direction which corresponds to the actual physical displacement of the stimulus. For the biasing step with an IFI, the response is maximum for the opposite direction. For all three types of biasing stimuli, directional sensitivity for a test stimulus was reduced most when it moved in the biasing direction, i.e. the direction which produced the strongest signal in directionally selective mechanisms. Unlike the effects of the same types of biasing stimuli on the perceived direction of a suprathreshold 180 degrees step of a grating [Pinkus, A., & Pantle, A. (1997). Probing motion signals with a priming paradigm. Vision Research, 37, 541-52; Pantle, A., Gallogly, D.P., & Piehler, O.C. (2000). Direction biasing by brief apparent motion stimuli. Vision Research, 40, 1979-91], all the direction-specific losses of sensitivity can be explained by changes in the response characteristics of directionally selective mechanisms.

Visual cortex: Fatigue and adaptation

Prolonged exposure to a visual pattern perturbs visual perception, affecting the appearance of subsequently viewed patterns. Recent results demonstrate that this visual adaptation is explained partly by a cellular mechanism acting in individual cortical neurons.

Attentional modulation of motion-in-depth processing

I used a novel effect of adaptation to a moving stimulus to investigate the role of attention in the processing of motion-in-depth (MID). Following adaptation to expansion, the time required to detect an expanding target in the same location as the adaptation target was significantly longer than following viewing of a constant-sized target. Conversely, following adaptation to contraction, detection times (DTs) for an expanding target were significantly shorter than for a constant-sized adaptation target. Changes in DTs following adaptation to contraction were substantially larger than those following adaptation to expansion. Attentional modulation of MID processing was examined by adding an alphanumeric discrimination task that distracted the observer's attention away from the location of the adaptation target. I compared the magnitude of DT effects while (a) observers passively fixated the alphanumeric sequence (single task condition) and (b) observers performed the discrimination task (dual task condition). DT effects were significantly smaller in the dual task condition than in the single task condition indicating that MID processing is modulated by attention.

Phantom motion after effects--evidence of detectors for the analysis of optic flow

BACKGROUND

Electrophysiological recording from the extrastriate cortex of non-human primates has revealed neurons that have large receptive fields and are sensitive to various components of object or self movement, such as translations, rotations and expansion/contractions. If these mechanisms exist in human vision, they might be susceptible to adaptation that generates motion aftereffects (MAEs). Indeed, it might be possible to adapt the mechanism in one part of the visual field and reveal what we term a 'phantom MAE' in another part.

RESULTS

The existence of phantom MAEs was probed by adapting to a pattern that contained motion in only two non-adjacent 'quarter' segments and then testing using patterns that had elements in only the other two segments. We also tested for the more conventional 'concrete' MAE by testing in the same two segments that had adapted. The strength of each MAE was quantified by measuring the percentage of dots that had to be moved in the opposite direction to the MAE in order to nullify it. Four experiments tested rotational motion, expansion/contraction motion, translational motion and a 'rotation' that consisted simply of the two segments that contained only translational motions of opposing direction. Compared to a baseline measurement where no adaptation took place, all subjects in all experiments exhibited both concrete and phantom MAEs, with the size of the latter approximately half that of the former.

CONCLUSIONS

Adaptation to two segments that contained upward and downward motion induced the perception of leftward and rightward motion in another part of the visual field. This strongly suggests there are mechanisms in human vision that are sensitive to complex motions such as rotations.

Equivalent background speed in recovery from motion adaptation

We measured, in the same observers, (1) the detectability, d, of a small rotational jump following adaptation to rotational motion and (2) the detectability of the same jump when superimposed on one of several background rotation speeds. Following 90 s of motion adaptation the detectability of the jump was impaired, and sensitivity slowly recovered over the course of 60 s. The detectability of the jump was also impaired by the background speed in a way consistent with a quadratic form of Weber's law. We propose that motion adaptation impairs the detectability of the small jump because it is as if an equivalent background speed has been superimposed on the display. We measured the equivalent background by finding the real background speed that produced the same d' at each instant in the recovery from motion adaptation. The equivalent background started at approximately one to two thirds the speed of the adapting motion, declined rapidly, rose to a small peak at 30 s, then disappeared by 60 s. Since the equivalent background speed corresponds to the speed of the motion aftereffect, we have measured the time course of the motion aftereffect with objective psychophysics.

Temporal and spatial frequency tuning of the flicker motion aftereffect

The motion aftereffect (MAE) was used to study the temporal and spatial frequency selectivity of the visual system at supra-threshold contrasts. Observers adapted to drifting sine-wave gratings of a range of spatial and temporal frequencies. The magnitude of the MAE induced by the adaptation was measured with counterphasing test gratings of a variety of spatial and temporal frequencies. Independently of the spatial or temporal frequency of the adapting grating, the largest MAE was found with slowly counterphasing test gratings (at approximately 0.125-0.25 Hz). The largest MAEs were also found when the test grating was of similar spatial frequency to that of the adapting grating, even at very low spatial frequencies (0.125 c/deg). These data suggest that MAEs are dominated by a single, low-pass temporal frequency mechanism and by a series of band-pass spatial frequency mechanisms. The band-pass spatial frequency tuning even at low spatial frequencies suggests that the "lowest adaptable channel" concept [Cameron et al. (1992). Vision Research, 32, 561-568] may be an artifact of disadvantaged low spatial frequencies using static test patterns.

Vernier in motion: what accounts for the threshold elevation?

Vernier acuity is susceptible to degradation by image motion. The purpose of this study was to determine to what extent vernier thresholds are elevated in the presence of image motion because of reduced stimulus visibility, due to contrast smearing, or to a shift in the spatial scale of analysis. To test the visibility hypothesis, we measured vernier thresholds as a function of stimulus velocity (0-6 deg/sec), for various levels of stimulus visibility, each normalized to the detection threshold at the respective velocity. Contrary to the prediction of the visibility hypothesis, vernier thresholds worsen as the velocity increases, even when the stimuli are equally visible. To test the shift in spatial scale hypothesis, we determined spatial frequency tuning functions for vernier discrimination and line detection tasks, using a masking paradigm. We measured vernier and line detection thresholds as a function of spatial frequency of a sine-wave mask (0.5-32 c/deg), and for stimulus and mask velocities ranging from 0 to 4 deg/sec. Peak masking for both vernier discrimination and line detection, which indicates the most sensitive band of spatial frequencies for each task, shifts systematically toward lower spatial frequencies as the velocity increases. The progressive increase in spatial scale largely accounts for the worsening of vernier thresholds for moving stimuli. Differences between peak masking for vernier discrimination and line detection were found at 0 and 1 deg/sec, suggesting that different mechanisms mediate the two tasks, at least at low velocities. The masking results are consistent with previous findings that directionally selective motion detectors mediate detection of moving stimuli, but suggest that these detectors do not analyze vernier offsets. We conclude that the elevation of vernier threshold for a moving stimulus is accounted for primarily by a shift of sensitivity to mechanisms of lower spatial frequency, and not by decreased stimulus visibility.

Attentional modulation of adaptation to two-component transparent motion

We have studied the effects of voluntary attention on the induction of motion aftereffects (MAEs). While adapting, observers paid attention to one of two transparently displayed random dot patterns, moving concurrently in opposite directions. Selective attention was found to modulate the susceptibility to motion adaptation very substantially. To measure the strength of the induced MAEs we modulated the signal-to-noise ratio of a real motion signal in a random dot pattern that was used to balance the aftereffect. Results obtained for adapting to single motion vectors show that the MAE can be represented as a shift of the psychometric function for motion direction discrimination. Selective attention to the different components of transparent motion altered the susceptibility to adaptation. Shifting attention from one component to the other caused a large shift of the psychometric curves, about 70-75% of the shift measured for the separate components of the transparent adapting stimulus. We conclude that attention can differentiate between spatially superimposed motion vectors and that attention modulates the activity of motion mechanisms before or at the level where adaptation gives rise to MAEs. The results are discussed in light of the role of attention in visual perception and the physiological site for attentional modulation of MAEs.

A transparent motion aftereffect contingent on binocular disparity

Under transparent motion conditions overlapping surfaces are perceived simultaneously, each with its own direction. The motion aftereffect (MAE) of transparent motion, however, is undirectional and its direction is opposite to that of a sensitivity-weighted vector sum of both inducing vectors. Here we report a bidirectional and transparent MAE contingent on binocular disparity. Depth (from retinal disparity) was introduced between two patterns. A fixation dot was presented at zero disparity, that is, located between the two adaptation patterns. After adaptation to such a stimulus configuration testing was carried out with two stationary test patterns at the same depths as the preceding moving patterns. For opposite directions a clear transparent MAE was perceived. However, if the adaptation directions were orthogonal the chance of a transparent MAE being perceived decreased substantially. This was subject dependent. Some subjects perceived an orthogonal transparent MAE whereas others saw the negative vector sum-an integrated MAE. In addition the behavior of the MAE when the distance in depth between adapting and test patterns was increased was investigated: it was found that the visibility of the MAE then decreased. Visibility is defined in this paper as: (i) the percentage of the trials in which MAEs are perceived and (ii) the average MAE duration. Both measures decreased with increasing distance. The results suggest that segregation and integration may be mediated by direction-tuned channels that interact with disparity-tuned channels.

Effect of contrast and adaptation on the perception of the direction and speed of drifting gratings

Three experiments were conducted to analyse the effect of contrast and adaptation state on the ability of human observers to discriminate the motion of drifting gratings. In the first experiment, subjects judged the direction of briefly presented gratings, which slowly drifted leftward or rightward. The test gratings were enveloped in space by a raised cosine function and in time by a Gaussian. The centre of the spatial envelope was either 2 deg left or right of the fixation point. An adaptive staircase procedure was used to find the velocities, at which the observer judged the motion direction in 75% of the presentations as leftwards or rightwards, respectively. In the second experiment, subjects judged the relative speed of two simultaneously presented gratings. Stimulus contrast was varied in both experiments from 0.01 to 0.32. Discrimination threshold vs contrast functions were measured before and after adaptation to a high-contrast (0.4) grating drifting at rates between 2 and 32 Hz. In a third experiment, subjects matched, before and after adaptation, the relative speed of a test stimulus, which had a constant contrast (0.04 or 0.08) and a variable speed, to that of a reference stimulus having a variable contrast but a constant speed. The results indicate that, before adaptation, direction and speed discrimination thresholds are independent of test contrast, except when test contrast approaches the detection threshold level. Adaptation to a drifting grating increases the lower threshold of motion (LTM) and the speed discrimination threshold (delta V/V) for low test contrasts. In addition, the point of subjective stationarity (PSS) shifts towards the adapted direction and this shift is more pronounced for low test contrasts. The perceived speed of a drifting grating increases with increasing contrast level. Adaptation to a drifting grating shifts the perceived speed vs log contrast function downwards and to the right (toward higher contrast levels) and this shift is greatest for adaptation frequencies between 8 and 16 Hz. We further explored the effects of adaptation contrast (0.04, 0.4 and 0.9) and adaptation drift direction (iso- or contra-directional) on the perceived speed versus contrast function. The effect of adaptation is greatest for iso-directional drift and increases with increasing adaptation contrast. The results are discussed in terms of a contrast gain control model of adaptation.

Motion adaptation governs the shape of motion-evoked cortical potentials

We recorded visually evoked potentials (VEPs) to motion onset/offset of square-wave gratings (dominant spatial frequency 0.69 c/deg, velocity 4.9 deg/sec, contrast 10%, luminance 15 cd/m2) with three electrode combinations (Oz vs Fz, Oz vs linked ears and parietal vs linked ears). In one experiment (seven subjects), we examined the effect of the duty-cycle of motion vs non-motion (5-80%) on the size of the various motion-evoked components. In another experiment (six subjects, duty-cycle 10%), we examined the effect of motion adaptation on the motion VEP. We observed both a positive VEP component around 110 msec (P1) and a negative component around 180 msec (N200). The amplitude of these components depended on duty-cycle and electrode position: N200 dominated at < or = 20% motion duty-cycle, P1 at > or = 50%; P1 dominated medially, N200 laterally. Motion adaptation enhanced the P1 and reduced the N200 by a factor of 3. Previous controversies regarding the major components of motion-evoked potential may be due to different duty-cycles. The effect of duty-cycle is probably caused by adaptation to the test stimulus; it can be predicted quantitatively by a simple one-parameter model based on the assumption that the VEP amplitude is proportional to the non-adapted proportion of motion-response generators.

Recovery from motion adaptation is delayed by successively presented orthogonal motion

Following a period of adaptation to a pattern moving in a particular direction, a subsequently viewed stationary pattern appears to move in the opposite direction for some time: the movement after effect (MAE). The MAE lasts longer when the test pattern is not immediately or not continuously presented after adaptation. This phenomenon is called storage. So far research indicates that storage only occurs when textured visual stimulation is absent during part of the test phase or if the processing of a stationary test stimulus is prevented (e.g. by binocular rivalry). We present evidence that storage-like phenomena can occur even while a textured and moving visual stimulus is phenomenally present. We adapted binocularly to uni-directional motion of a random-pixel array M1 for 60 sec. This stimulus was immediately followed by another moving pattern M2. Its motion direction was orthogonal to that of M1. The presentation time of M2 was the independent variable. A stationary pattern was presented immediately after presentation of M2. The direction of the resulting integrated uni-directional MAE was measured. For short presentation times of M2 there is an integrated uni-directional MAE, which shows an interaction of the output of units stimulated by both moving patterns. However, it appeared that the effect of M1 on the direction of this combined uni-directional MAE is much longer present than would be expected from the MAE duration of M1, when tested in isolation.

Movement aftereffect of bi-vectorial transparent motion

Two moving random-pixel arrays (RPAs) were presented simultaneously in the same target field. These RPAs are perceived as two superimposed transparent moving sheets. Although two directions are perceived simultaneously during stimulus presentation, the movement aftereffect (MAE) is unidirectional. The visual system averages both motion signals in the MAE. For motion vectors of equal magnitude and perpendicular direction the MAE direction is the inverse of the sum of both vectors. In the first experiment we measured perceived direction of the MAE of transparent motion for a range of speed combinations. Results indicate that vector summation only predicts the correct MAE direction for combinations of equal speeds. It is suggested that the direction of the MAE of transparent motion is a resultant of the weighted summation of the component inducing vectors. The question then arises what determines the weighting factors. Directional sensitivity and MAE duration of the individual vectors under transparent conditions were measured and used to weigh the vectors and predict the MAE direction of transparent motion. Statistical analyses showed that MAE duration is a better basis to determine the weighting factors predicting the direction of the MAE of transparent motion than component sensitivity. The direction of the MAE of transparent motion thus seems to be determined by the amount of adaptation to the component vectors as reflected by MAE duration. The results suggest that this gain control cannot be located in the individual motion detectors and must be situated at or after some subsequent cooperation stage of the human motion analysis system.

The tactile movement aftereffect

The existence of a tactile movement aftereffect was established in a series of experiments on the palmar surface of the hand and fingers of psychophysical observers. During adaptation, observers cupped their hand around a moving drum for up to 3 min; following this period of stimulation, they typically reported an aftereffect consisting of movement sensations located on and deep to the skin, and lasting for up to 1 min. Preliminary experiments comparing a number of stimulus materials mounted on the drum demonstrated that a surface approximating a low-spatial-frequency square wave, with a smooth microtexture, was especially effective at inducing the aftereffect; this adapting stimulus was therefore used throughout the two main experiments. In Experiment 1, the vividness of the aftereffect produced by 2 min of adaptation was determined under three test conditions: with the hand (1) remaining on the now stationary drum; (2) in contact with a soft, textured surface; or (3) suspended in air. Subjects' free magnitude estimates of the peak vividness of the aftereffect were not significantly different across conditions; each subject experienced the aftereffect at least once under each condition. Thus the tactile movement aftereffect does not seem to depend critically on the ponditions of stimulation that obtain while it is being experienced. In Experiment 2, the vividness and duration of the aftereffect were measured as a function of the duration of the adapting stimulus. Both measures increased steadily over the range of durations explored (30-180 sec). In its dependence on adapting duration, the aftereffect resembles the waterfall illusion in vision. An explanation for the tactile movement aftereffect is proposed, based on the model of cortical dynamics of Whitsel et al. (1989, 1991). With assumed modest variation of one parameter across individuals, this application of the model is able to account both for the data of the majority of subjects, who experienced the aftereffect as opposite in direction to the adapting stimulus, and for those of an anomalous subject, who consistently experienced the aftereffect as being in the same direction as the adapting stimulus.

Dichoptic activation of the early motion system

The short range or early motion system has long been considered incapable of binocular integration. We have developed dichoptic motion stimuli which are based upon the decomposition of traveling sinewave gratings into the sum of two standing waves in spatial and temporal quadrature. The monocular views of such displays appear as counterphase flicker but when presented dichoptically the perception is of movement in a unique direction. Two lines of evidence are presented for the binocularity of early motion mechanisms in human vision. First, adaptation to dichoptic motion sinewave gratings is found to result in a motion aftereffect. Second, random texture motion displays based on the quadrature decomposition are found to support dichoptic perception of motion direction, but not figure/ground. Unlike random dot kinematograms, these displays do not necessitate alternating the direction of motion during dichoptic presentation. This encumbrance, and the reliance on figure/ground discrimination, may have been responsible for prior failure to achieve dichoptic motion perception with short range stimuli.

Effect of spatial configuration on motion aftereffects

Sensitivity to motion was measured by the percentage of trials on which an observer reported seeing motion of briefly presented high-contrast sinusoidal gratings moving over a range of velocities. The psychometric curve was remeasured following adaptation to a grating moving in one direction for an extended period of time. Adaptation shifted the minimum of the psychometric curve toward the direction of the direction of the adapting stimulus. The shift was smaller when the adapting field was larger than the test. In a second set of experiments we measured the effect of motion adaptation on contrast thresholds for moving gratings of different sizes. Threshold elevation was maximal when adapting and test sizes matched. We present a mechanistic model of the motion aftereffect that consists of independent multiplicative gain controls in motion-sensing mechanisms tuned to different rates of motion. In addition, we discuss a model of size effects in motion adaptation that invokes diffuse inhibitory connections among motion-sensing mechanisms.

Adaptation to auditory motion in the horizontal plane: effect of prior exposure to motion on motion detectability

Thresholds for auditory motion detectability were measured in a darkened anechoic chamber while subjects were adapted to horizontally moving sound sources of various velocities. All stimuli were 500-Hz lowpass noises presented at a level of 55 dBA. The threshold measure employed was the minimum audible movement angle (MAMA)--that is, the minimum angle a horizontally moving sound must traverse to be just discriminable from a stationary sound. In an adaptive, two-interval forced-choice procedure, trials occurred every 2-5 sec (Experiment 1) or every 10-12 sec (Experiment 2). Intertrial time was "filled" with exposure to the adaptor--a stimulus that repeatedly traversed the subject's front hemifield at ear level (distance: 1.7 m) at a constant velocity (-150 degrees/sec to +150 degrees/sec) during a run. Average MAMAs in the control condition, in which the adaptor was stationary (0 degrees/sec,) were 2.4 degrees (Experiment 1) and 3.0 degrees (Experiment 2). Three out of 4 subjects in each experiment showed significantly elevated MAMAs (by up to 60%), with some adaptors relative to the control condition. However, there were large intersubject differences in the shape of the MAMA versus adaptor velocity functions. This loss of sensitivity to motion that most subjects show after exposure to moving signals is probably one component underlying the auditory motion aftereffect (Grantham, 1989), in which judgments of the direction of moving sounds are biased in the direction opposite to that of a previously presented adaptor.

Apparent motion can survive binocular rivalry suppression

For short-range motion, observers dichoptically viewed a random-dot cinematogram and a rival target. Upon keypress, the first frame of the cinematogram was replaced by the second frame. Observers judged the direction of motion, which was governed by the initial position of the central region. Performance was well above chance during both dominance and suppression. For long-range motion, observers rated the motion produced by sequentially flashing two small spots, with the first spot contained within a rivalrous region. Suppression reduced but did not prevent perception of this motion. Presenting the second motion frame to both eyes weakened both forms of motion.

After-effects of moving textured background in motion-sensitive neurons of anuran optic tectum

Motion-sensitive neurons in anuran optic tectum were shown to respond to a stationary object centered in the excitatory receptive field, if a textured background moved for a while and then stopped ('motion after-response'). This motion after-response was attributed to a post-inhibitory rebound activation derived from effects of masking the excitatory receptive field center surrounded by an antagonistic inhibitory region. It was suggested that a similar rebound activation mechanism may also be involved in a certain type of perceptual motion after-effects in humans.

Duration, time constant, and decay of the linear motion aftereffect as a function of inspection duration

Subjects rated the strength of the motion aftereffect (MAE) produced by the upward motion of a horizontal grating in two experiments. Inspection periods ranged from 30 to 900 sec in Experiment 1 and from 20 to 120 sec in Experiment 2. A minimum of 22 h elapsed between trials. The decay time constant increased as the square root of the inspection duration for values between 1 min and 15 min of inspection. The ratings suggested that the MAEs consisted of three phases: an initial maximum-strength phase, a decay phase, and a tail. The duration of all three phases increased and the decay rate decreased with increasing inspection duration over the entire range. The results indicate that duration, time constant, and decay rate are not fixed properties of the motion-processing channels in the visual system.

Motion aftereffects with horizontally moving sound sources in the free field

A horizontally moving sound was presented to an observer seated in the center of an anechoic chamber. The sound, either a 500-Hz low-pass noise or a 6300-Hz high-pass noise, repeatedly traversed a semicircular arc in the observer's front hemifield at ear level (distance: 1.5 m). At 10-sec intervals this adaptor was interrupted, and a 750-msec moving probe (a 500-Hz low-pass noise) was presented from a horizontal arc 1.6 m in front of the observer. During a run, the adaptor was presented at a constant velocity (-200 degrees to +200 degrees/sec), while probes with velocities varying from -10 degrees to +10 degrees/sec were presented in a random order. Observers judged the direction of motion (left or right) of each probe. As in the case of stimuli presented over headphones (Grantham & Wightman, 1979), an auditory motion aftereffect (MAE) occurred: subjects responded "left" to probes more often when the adaptor moved right than when it moved left. When the adaptor and probe were spectrally the same, the MAE was greater than when they were from different spectral regions; the magnitude of this difference depended on adaptor speed and was subject-dependent. It is proposed that there are two components underlying the auditory MAE: (1) a generalized bias to respond that probes move in the direction opposite to that of the adaptor, independent of their spectra; and (2) a loss of sensitivity to the velocity of moving sounds after prolonged exposure to moving sounds having the same spectral content.

Apparent velocity of motion aftereffects in central and peripheral vision

Adapting to a drifting grating (temporal frequency 4 Hz, contrast 0.4) in the periphery gave rise to a motion aftereffect (MAE) when the grating was stopped. A standard unadapted foveal grating was matched to the apparent velocity of the MAE, and the matching velocity was approximately constant regardless of the visual field position and spatial frequency of the adapting grating. On the other hand, when the MAE was measured by nulling with real motion of the test grating, nulling velocity was found to increase with eccentricity. The nulling velocity was constant when scaled to compensate for changes in the spatial 'grain' of the visual field. Thus apparent velocity of MAE is constant across the visual field, but requires a greater velocity of real motion to cancel it in the periphery. This confirms that the mechanism underlying MAE is spatially-scaled with eccentricity, but temporally homogeneous. A further indication of temporal homogeneity is that when MAE is tracked, by matching or by nulling, the time course of temporal decay of the aftereffect is similar for central and for peripheral stimuli.

A shift in the perceived simultaneity of adjacent visual stimuli following adaptation to stroboscopic motion along the same axis

Adaptation to stroboscopic motion affects the perceived temporal order of two adjacent stimuli presented along the same axis. The extent of shift appears to be independent of the duration of adaptation and under the conditions studied was 3-6 msec in a direction consistent with a cancellation of the motion aftereffect. There was no effect upon the locus of simultaneity when adapting stroboscopic motion was orthogonal to that of the test stimulus.

Movement adaptation in the peripheral retina

With strict fixation, the eye quickly adapts to moving periodic stimuli presented to the peripheral retina. A slowly spinning sector disk, 7 degrees in diameter, will rapidly appear to slow down and come to a standstill (within 5-25 sec). The time required for this full motion adaptation decreases with (a) increasing retinal eccentricity (30-70 degrees); (b) increasing number of sectors (16-60); and (c) decreasing speed of rotation (0.3-0.5 rev/sec). After the standstill, the disk fades from view in much the same way as a stationary stimulus (Troxler effect). A spinning disk presented to the temporal retina appears to stop about 2.5 times faster than a disk presented to the nasal side. Adapting one eye reduces the time of adaptation for the other eye by 70%. If an aperiodic sector disk is used, no standstill is perceived.

Directional symmetry in the spiral aftereffect

The duration of the spiral aftereffect was measured after 1, 2, and 5 min. of adaptation for “inward” and “outward” rotation of the spiral. Duration of the aftereffect increased as adaptation time increased but the direction of rotation of the spiral had no effect.

Adaptation and gain normalization

It has been suggested in the past that adaptation effects may serve a useful role in perception. This paper shows that if the adaptation process follows a simple scheme, called proportional gain adjustment, then it can fulfil two useful functions: correction of errors and recalibration. The proposed scheme controls the gain of the system. Although it is memoryless, it ensures a setting of the gain at such a level that the average of the measured signal in the environment is always mapped onto a fixed internal representation. The proportional gain adjustment scheme is discussed in the context of single-band multi-channel models, and is shown to exhibit various phenomena associated with visual adaptation.

Directional specificity in tilt aftereffect induced with moving contours: a reexamination

In the tilt aftereffect a grating or bar is perceived as being slightly rotated from its veridical orientation if it is preceded by a similar adaptation stimulus with a slightly different orientation. It has been reported that the tilt aftereffect is not direction specific. That is, the magnitude of the misperception was not affected by whether the adaptation and test stimuli were moving in the same or the opposite directions. However, when we required subjects to fixate on a stationary spot during adaptation to a moving grating, the tilt aftereffect was strongest when both stimuli moved in the same direction. Moreover, the tilt aftereffect was not direction specific without such fixation. These results are consistent with the distribution shift model in which the perceived orientation reflects the distribution of orientation selective units, some of which are also direction selective.

The movement aftereffect and a distribution-shift model for coding the direction of visual movement

At present the only widely accepted explanation for the movement aftereffect is Sutherland's so-called ratio model, which states that motion is coded by taking the ratio between the outputs of detectors tuned to opposite directions. However, as yet there have been few attempts to derive predictions from the model in the context of movement aftereffects and test them experimentally. This paper reportws experiments which attempt to determine whether such a simple model is sufficient, or requires additional assumptions which recast it in a form more akin to the distribution-shift models used in other domains (which assume comparisons between outputs in the whole population of direction detectors, rather than just those tuned to opposite directions). These experiemtns examined the interactive effects of two simultaneous directions on subsequent aftereffect durations and directions. The results obtained are difficult to explain in terms of a simple ratio model but can be incorporated into a more complex distribution-shift type model.

Visual aftereffects derived from inspection of orthogonally moving patterns

Alternate inspection of patterns moving in orthogonal directions induces an aftereffect in which a stationary test pattern seems to move in a new direction. This direction is the resultant of the two directions of aftereffect that would have arisen from separately inspecting each of the moving patterns. The direction in which objects appear to move, like their color and depth, can thus depend on a synthesis of unperceived components.